Former President Barack Obama senior advisor Valerie Jarrett on Tuesday urged whichever 2020 Democratic presidential candidate emerges as the leader after the conclusion of Super Tuesday to “break with conventional wisdom and announce a running mate that’s a woman of color,” especially if it is Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), former Vice President Joe Biden or former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
Jarrett explained on CBS’s “This Morning” that “these are not normal times” and argued having a woman of color “would send an important signal” heading into the next round of primaries.
“I think that whoever emerges tonight, particularly if it’s Bernie Sanders, if it’s Vice President Biden or even if it’s Mayor Bloomberg, what I would do is break with conventional wisdom and announce a running mate that’s a woman of color,” Jarrett stated before being cut off.
“Tonight?” asked host Gayle King.
“No, not tonight,” Jarrett replied. “Certainly before the next primary. Woman, person of color, someone who reflects the diversity of our party. And yeah, that’s not usual, that’s not what they normally do, but these are not normal times. And I think it would send an important signal going into the next round of primaries to do so with a running mate.”
Democrats Allow Communists
to Infiltrate Their Party Across the Nation
“Obama’s new home in Washington
has been described as the “nerve center” of the
anti-Trump opposition. Former attorney general Eric Holder has said
that Obama is “ready to roll” and has aligned himself with the
“resistance.” Former high-level Obama campaign staffers now work with a
variety of groups organizing direct action against
Trump’s initiatives. “Resistance School,” for example, features
lectures by former campaign executive Sara El-Amine, author of the Obama Organizing.”
*
“Professor Paul Kengor has
extensively researched the Chicago communists whose progeny include David
Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett, and Barack Hussein Obama. Add the openly
Marxist, pro-communist Ayers, and you have many of the key players who put
Obama into power.”
*
We are all victims of the Obama cabal’s collusion with Russia –
President Trump’s voters and all Americans who believe in our free and fair
election process.
BARACK OBAMA:
Was he America’s first closet Communist president?
Obama choose Communists and Marxists for the highest,
most powerful positions in our land, including his closest political advisors,
and his head of the CIA. These facts are not in dispute. Most are
openly admitted by the people in question, as necessary damage control.
Our press chooses not to report them.
*
Professor Paul
Kengor has extensively researched the Chicago communists whose progeny include
David Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett, and Barack Hussein Obama. Add the openly
Marxist, pro-communist Ayers, and you have many of the key players who put
Obama into power.
DESTABILIZE AMERICA TO LAY GROUNDS FOR A MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP
“Obama’s new home in Washington has
been described as the “nerve center” of the anti-Trump opposition.
Former attorney general Eric Holder has said that Obama is “ready to roll”
and has aligned himself with the “resistance.” Former
high-level Obama campaign staffers now work with a variety of groups
organizing direct action against Trump’s initiatives. “Resistance School,”
for example, features lectures by former campaign executive
Sara El-Amine, author of the Obama Organizing.”
*
TRAITOR
BARACK OBAMA and the MEX FASCIST MOVEMENT of LA RAZA “The Race”
Reconquistas
Muñoz, Solis present at Obama sovereignty sellout session ...Obama was joined
at the meeting [about a push to amnesty millions of border-hopping job thieves]
by Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis, Senior Advisor Valerie
Jarrett, Assistant to the President for Legislative Affairs Phil Schiliro,
and White House Director of Intergovernmental Affairs [and former 'Tan Klan'
minion] Cecilia Muñoz ...
* "Of course none of this comes as any
surprise considering that Obama's point person on illegal immigration, Cecilia
Munoz, once worked for the ultra-radical National Council of La Raza [aka the
Tan Klan], a racist group that is committed to staging a takeover of the
American Southwest and returning it to Mexico...."
But soon enough,
the reality of Barack Obama’s un popularity,
the reality of the criminal abuse by his administration in trying to frame and
otherwise take down President Trump, and the reality of a booming economy
helping all Americans,
would take the air out of her balloon. Eric Georgatos
Barack
Obama: Women ‘Indisputably Better’ Leaders Than Men
Mohd
Rasfan/AFP/Getty Images
16 Dec 20192,733
1:44
Former President Barack Obama
declared Monday that women are better leaders than men, musing that the world’s living
standards would increase if the fairer sex ran the world.
Speaking in Singapore at a
private event on leadership, Obama conceded that while women have their flaws,
he argued that they are “indisputably better” than men, the BBC reports.
“Now women, I just want you to know;
you are not perfect, but what I can say pretty indisputably is that you’re
better than us [men],” the former president said. “I’m absolutely
confident that for two years if every nation on earth was run by women, you
would see a significant improvement across the board on just about everything…
living standards and outcomes.”
Obama went on to argue that older
men in power are largely responsible for many of the world’s most pressing
problems and urged for a younger generation of leaders to take their place.
“If you look at the world and look
at the problems it’s usually old people, usually old men, not getting out of
the way,” he stated. “It is important for political leaders to try and
remind themselves that you are there to do a job, but you are not there for
life, you are not there in order to prop up your own sense of self importance
or your own power.”
Obama’s remarks come as he and
former first lady Michelle Obama are in southeast Asia to promote women’s
education in as part of the Obama Foundation’s Girls Opportunity Alliance
program. Last week, Michelle Obama, Hollywood actress Julia Roberts, and
former Miss Malaysia Deborah Henry visited a high school
in Vietnam, where they spoke to female students about the importance of
education and leadership.
Forget
‘Michelle for President’
Our betters in the MSM,
and related ruling-class mouthpieces, have set the narrative: the
lackluster, too-crazy pack of Democrat presidential candidates, even with a few
token billionaires, will ultimately give way to the entry of Michelle Obama
into the race. The former First Lady, author of an apparently
best-selling memoir, will inject palpable blue energy throughout the nation,
return black America to a 95+% Democrat voting bloc, consolidate the Obama
voting coalitions that won two presidential elections, and the evil interloper
Trump will be sent packing.
Don’t buy this narrative.
In a country of 320+
million people, there is always a sizable segment who will not be willing or
able to discern or question anything beyond what they are told by the MSM, and
will follow the narrative. That segment is actually becoming smaller
every year; the reality of fake news has diluted the MSM’s influence to a far
greater degree than they understand. But that’s not why I’m not buying
the narrative.
Here’s why:
‘Obama’ is how we got
Trump . For all the gigabytes devoted to explaining how Donald
Trump was elected President of the United States, the simplest two-word
explanation has always been: Barack Obama.
Most Americans never
agreed with the radical left-wing policies that President Obama instituted, nor
did they appreciate his subtle, persistent denigration of America’s character,
identity and place in the world. But Americans did salute to the notion that we
should be especially careful not to criticize America’s first black
President.
In short, the absence of
strong criticism of President Obama and his policies was not due to their
popularity, but rather due to a surrender to the political reality enforced in
great degree by the MSM that any such criticism would be labeled as racist.
His policies and view of America were in fact alarming to many Americans,
who silently bided their time until he was out of office.
The truth is that Barack
Obama was and is a radical leftist ideologue who in his own words sought to
fundamentally transform America. A few observers saw this agenda
from the beginning of Obama’s appearance on the national scene, but they were
voices in a wilderness dominated by a sycophantic media. The American
people never supported a fundamental transformation of their country -- in
leftist terms, a shredding of America’s Judeo-Christian heritage in favor of a
godless, George Soros-vision of an Open Society, directed and controlled by
almighty secular government -- and the more they understood the truth of who
Obama was and what he was trying to do, the angrier and more resentful they
became .
Donald Trump was the
anti-Obama for one simple reason: he loves America.
And so…the “Michelle
Obama riding on the residual goodwill of the Obama name!” campaign narrative,
doesn’t resonate.
‘Blexit’ is real . Candace Owens
deserves tremendous credit for branding and building the “Blexit” movement, and
for devoting her amazing intelligence and energy to its articulate
messages. Yet well before Blexit was a thing, Donald Trump planted the
seed with black Americans when he said in August 2016: “What do you have to lose by trying something new, like
Trump ?”
Three-plus years later,
with black unemployment the lowest in recorded history, polls that show roughly
a third of likely voting black Americans supporting President Trump are not an
accident or a fluke. (And they may just mark the floor of
his support in 2020.) They reflect conscious recognition among black
Americans of simple truths: black lives generally did not get
better under eight years of Obama; black lives generally have gotten much
better under less than three years of President Trump.
And so…the “Michelle
Obama will bring back the good old days of black prosperity!” campaign
narrative falls flat.
Barack Obama is the
elephant in the room re Barr/Durham . Of all the names that
engaged Americans associate with the Russia Collusion hoax -- Brennan, Clapper,
Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Ohr, Rosenstein, Simpson, Steele, etc. --
there is one that is going to loom larger and larger in public thought as the
Horowitz IG report and Barr/Durham followup becomes public: Barack
Obama.
Our own guess is
that when the truth finally comes out , Americans across the
political spectrum will be stunned at the level of criminality and corruption
in the Obama administration. It will shock the collective
conscience of the nation that all of this was directed to brazenly and
arrogantly overturning the will of the American people for the ugly but simple
reason that Donald Trump was an outsider who threatened the
Obama/leftist/globalist hold on power.
If the Horowitz report
and Barr/Durham follow-up reveals, as seems increasingly likely, the deliberate
and nefarious concoction of the Russia Collusion Hoax by leaders in the CIA,
FBI, and DoJ, the vast majority of Americans, including millions who have
historically identified themselves politically as Democrats, will be fiercely
offended at this historic, unconscionable abuse. And who is at the top of
all the plotting and scheming and lying and weaponization of government against
the will of the people? Barack Obama.
And so…the ”Michelle
Obama will bring back the days of the scandal-free Obama administration!”
campaign narrative reeks.
Michelle’s heart isn’t in
it… and may not be a happy heart anyway . Mrs. Obama is on record
saying she has no interest in running, and of course, those words by themselves
mean nothing as to whether she will enter the race. But we think they do
signal that at her core, her heart is not in it. And ‘it’ refers to the
pressure, the nastiness, the unrelenting spotlight, the
every-word-and-every-smirk-on-video scrutiny of an American presidential race.
Michelle Obama’s eight
years in a soft, adulatory spotlight as First Lady are not the same as the
brass tacks rough-and-tumble of a presidential campaign. And even if the
MSM did everything in its power to shield her (and it surely would), the MSM is
not the gatekeeper it once was. Plus, winners tend to be happy
warriors. There has always seemed to be an undercurrent of anger in
Michelle Obama’s countenance, and if it ever flared on the campaign trail, she
could quickly find herself in a big hole. Anger doesn’t win elections.
Michelle Obama may or may
not get into the race; it’s probably a 50/50 proposition at this point.
And if she does get in, she’ll have access to the best messaging talent the
left can buy. So she’d make waves for a while. But soon enough, the
reality of Barack Obama’s un popularity, the reality of the
criminal abuse by his administration in trying to frame and otherwise take down
President Trump, and the reality of a booming economy helping all Americans,
would take the air out of her balloon. “Bring Back Barack” is not a winning campaign
theme. And if a tweet or two happened to get under her skin, the result
could be ugly.
“Michelle Obama for
President” is not inevitable or invincible.
Eric Georgatos is a former corporate
lawyer who operated the Brushfires of Freedom blog from 2008-2016 (a book of
top postings from the blog is available at America,
Can We Talk? ).
MICHELLE
OBAMA ANNOUNCES SHE WILL RUN FOR THE WHITE HOUSE AND BE BARACK’S THIRD TERM FOR
LIFE.
MEXICO
WILL ELECT HER!
The main
objective of “political animals” like Obama and the Clintons is to get elected;
it’s not to fix a broken America, nor to protect her. There are people who
govern and there are people who campaign; Obama and the Clintons are the
latter. Just look at the huge Republican electoral gains under Obama and the
Clintons. It’s amazing that Democrats who still care about their party still
support the very people who have brought it down.
Editorial Reviews: Obama Is Making You Poorer—But
Who’s Getting Rich?
GET THIS BOOK!
Obamanomics: How Barack Obama Is Bankrupting You and
Enriching His Wall Street Friends, Corporate Lobbyists, and Union Bosses
BY TIMOTHY P CARNEY
Editorial Reviews
Obama Is Making You Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?
Goldman Sachs , GE, Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same
“special interests” Barack Obama was supposed to chase from the temple—are
profiting handsomely from Obama’s Big Government policies that crush taxpayers,
small businesses, and consumers. In Obamanomics , investigative
reporter Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media ignores and
the White House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and Change, Obama is
delivering corporate socialism to America, all while claiming he’s battling
corporate America. It’s corporate welfare and regulatory robbery—it’s
OBAMANOMICS TO SERVE THE RICH AND GLOBALIST BILLIONAIRES.
No comments:
Post a Comment