Invitations to Voter Fraud in 2020
California is Exhibit A - while key battleground states are also at risk.
Invitations to Voter Fraud in 2020
California is
Exhibit A - while key battleground states are also at risk.
Fri Sep 4, 2020
When the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Indiana’s voter identification
law, the Court observed that “flagrant examples” of voter fraud “have been
documented throughout this Nation’s history by respected historians and
journalists.” As the National Commission on Federal Election Reform stated in
its 2005
bipartisan report, the problem “is not the magnitude of voter fraud.
In close or disputed elections, and there are many, a small amount of fraud
could make the margin of difference.” The report noted that “[I]nvalid voter
files, which contain ineligible, duplicate, fictional, or deceased voters, are
an invitation to fraud.”
BLOG EDITOR: THERE IS A REASON WHY BIDEN – PELOSI HAVE
PROMISED AMNESTY FOR 40 MILLION MEX FLAG WAVERS. THEY ARE BUYING THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES!
California, the nation’s
leading sanctuary state for illegal aliens, has opened the door to
unprecedented opportunities for such voter fraud – and that’s even before
California’s use of universal mail-in voting that the state is putting into
place this year for the general election. While California is virtually certain not
to be a close contest between President Trump and Joe Biden, California’s
broken voting system illustrates what can go wrong across the country where the
margins of votes between the candidates may be very slim indeed.
A Facebook
post in November 2018 stated that 449,000 Californians turned
down jury duty claiming they were not citizens. The post went on to say that
these non-citizens were on the voter registration list, reasoning that
prospective jurors are often culled from voter registration lists.
Left leaning commentators
have questioned the accuracy of this post, claiming that Department of Motor
Vehicles (DMV) records are the primary source for the state to identify
prospective jurors. Registrars of voter data are used as a secondary source,
they argue. Such criticisms miss the forest for the trees when it comes to
California and other states where DMV and voter registration databases are
electronically linked. Voter registration data are transferred from DMVs to
state voter registration systems. Even if DMV records are the primary source
for these states to identify prospective jurors, it doesn't matter because
there is a significant overlap with the voter registration data systems. The
DMV driver licensing process is used to generate automatic registration data
that feed the voter registration data systems.
California’s Department
of Motor Vehicles automatically registers people to vote. California
allows illegal immigrants to obtain driver licenses. Add them to
California's population of legal immigrants who can obtain driver licenses
– none of whom are eligible to vote in federal elections - and there is a large
pool of non-U.S. citizens who may be registered to vote anyway. This is an
invitation to fraud. California
officials have admitted, for example, that they had to investigate
whether ineligible individuals who were erroneously registered to vote by the
Department of Motor Vehicles cast ballots in the June 2018 primary.
California is not an
isolated case of a state linking DMV with voter registration. At least 36
states “currently or will soon have fully or substantially electronic voter
registration at DMVs,” according to a 2019 report by the Brennan Center for
Justice. These include the battle ground states of Colorado, Florida, Iowa,
Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, and
Pennsylvania.
Colorado, like
California, permits illegal immigrants to obtain driver licenses. Minnesota and
Michigan are considering such legislation.
States that do not allow
illegal immigrants to obtain driver licenses but have electronic links between
DMV and voter registration systems still have a problem with legal immigrants
who can obtain driver licenses. These non-U.S. citizens may become
automatically registered to vote even though they are not eligible
to vote in federal elections. This has happened in Pennsylvania, for
example. The door is then open for these non-U.S. citizens who are legally in
this country to vote illegally.
The problem with
ineligible voters is much larger than just automatic voter registration at the
DMV. Some states have failed to comply with federal law mandating them to
maintain accurate voter rolls and remove inactive voter registrations from
their records.
On January 3, 2019,
California and Los Angeles County settled
a case brought by the conservative watchdog Judicial Watch,
requiring them to purge as many as 1.5 million inactive voter registrations
across the state in compliance with federal law. L.A. County alone allegedly
had a voter registration rate of 112 percent of its adult citizen population.
California was not the
only state settling with Judicial Watch over the issue of voter registration
records. Ohio, a key battle ground state, also settled.
Judicial Watch has also
brought a lawsuit this year against Pennsylvania for failing to make reasonable
efforts to remove ineligible voters from their rolls as required by federal
law. Judicial Watch alleged that Pennsylvania has over 800,000 “inactive”
registrations on its voter rolls.
Pennsylvania, like Ohio,
is a key battleground state. President Trump won Pennsylvania in 2016 by 0.7
percentage points (44,292 votes). Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton wondered whether
Pennsylvania state and local officials, many of whom are Democrats, “want to be
able to steal elections.”
Judicial Watch also filed
a lawsuit against North Carolina and two of its counties for failing to clean
their voter rolls. North Carolina is also a battleground state.
“In June 2019, the U.S.
Election Assistance Commission (EAC) released data,” Judicial Watch said in its
press release announcing the lawsuit, “showing that voter registration rates in
a significant proportion of North Carolina’s 100 counties are close to, at or
above 100% of their age-eligible citizenry – statistics considered by the
courts to be a strong indication that a jurisdiction is not taking the steps
required by law to remove ineligible registrants." Judicial Watch President
Fitton said that “Dirty voting rolls can mean dirty elections, and Judicial
Watch must insist that North Carolina follows federal law to clean up its
voting rolls.”
On top of out-of-date and
inaccurate voter registration rolls within a single state, there is no
comprehensive coordination among all the states to eliminate duplicate voter
registrations in more than one state. Such multistate voter registration
duplications, according to the National Commission on Election Reform, “are a
source of potential fraud.”
Imagine the potential for
fraud in this year’s general election, particularly in the states where ballots
are being mailed directly to all voters. At least nine states fall into that
category.
In addition to California
sending out ballots automatically to all voters for the first time, Nevada – a
battleground state – is also doing so for the first time in a rushed fashion.
In 34 additional states, absentee voting is allowed for all voters – no excuse
required.
Absentee ballot
applications are being sent to all voters for the first time in at least 8
states. Three of them - Iowa, New Mexico and Wisconsin - are battleground
states.
According to a New
York Times analysis, “At least three-quarters of all American voters
will be eligible to receive a ballot in the mail for the 2020 election — the
most in U.S. history.” Who knows how many of those receiving ballots in the
mail are ineligible to vote but will send in their ballots anyway to be
counted?
Back in 2005, the
National Commission on Federal Election Reform warned that voting by mail is
“likely to increase the risks of fraud and of contested elections.” That was at
a time when voting by mail was still in its early stages across the country.
The 2020 general
election will encounter unprecedented risks of fraud and of contested
elections. It’s inevitable considering the widespread reliance on universal
mail-in voting and the festering problem of inaccurate, out of date voter
registration rolls. Hold on tight. We’re likely to be in for a rough
ride.
Feds: 19 Non-Citizens Charged with Voting in 2016 Election in Swing State
A total of 19 non-citizens in the swing state of North Carolina have been charged with voter fraud after allegedly voting in the 2016 presidential election.
This week, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina prosecutors announced voter fraud charges against 19 non-citizens, from a variety of countries, whom they allege cast votes in the 2016 election after a years-long federal investigation.
Seven of the 19 non-citizens were charged with falsely claiming American citizenship or making false statements on voter registration applications. The seven were also charged with a misdemeanor for unlawfully casting ballots in the 2016 presidential election.
The seven include:
- Francisco Antonio-Aguirre, 64-years-old, of Guatemala
- Roob Kaur Atar-Singh, 57-years-old, of Malaysia
- Rosalva Negrete-Toledo, 65-years-old, of Mexico
- Dave Delano Virgil, 57-years-old, of Tobago
- Eloy Alberto Zayas-Berrier, 70-years-old, of Cuba
- Emmanuel Olakunle Atoyebi, 31-years-old, of Nigeria
- Mokhtar Qaid Ahmed Gulaimid, 48-years-old, of Yemen
Another 12 non-citizens were hit with misdemeanor charges for unlawfully casting ballots in the 2016 presidential election. Those 12 include:
- Ismay Prudence Kathleen James, 54-years-old, of Bermuda
- Donald Christian Martyn, 44-years-old, of Sierra Leone
- Chaim Pinto, 68-years-old, of Israel
- John Andrew Rapsky, 54-years-old, of Canada
- Baijoo Pottakulath Thomas, 58-years-old, of India
- Shuqin Yin, 54-years-old, of China
- Chirong Yin Billings, 56-years-old, of China
- Henry Alberto Araya-Vega, 52-years-old, of Costa Rica
- Rufina Concho-Locklear, 82-years-old, of Mexico
- Alberto Damaize-Job, 73-years-old, of Nicaragua
- Armando Nava-Juarez, 51-years-old, of Mexico
- Manuel Efrain Valladares, 48-years-old, of El Salvador
If convicted, the 19 non-citizens face anywhere from one year to six years in federal prison and fines of $100,000 to $350,000. It is unclear if convictions will make the non-citizens eligible for deportation.
President Trump won North Carolina against Democrat Hillary Clinton in 2016 by a margin of fewer than 174,000 votes. In Mecklenburg County, home to the state’s largest city of Charlotte, Clinton won by a huge margin with more than 62 percent of the vote.
In this year’s presidential election, Democrats are fighting to implement universal mail-in voting that would deliver every registered voter a ballot to fill out, unsolicited. Government Accountability Insititute (GAI) research director Eric Eggers has told Breitbart News that such a plan could see about 24 million ineligible or inaccurate voter registrants receiving mail-in ballots.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.
Nolte: Joe Biden Losing Hispanic Voters to Trump in Critical Swing State of Florida
Joe Biden’s collapse in the polls marches on as news breaks he’s losing the Hispanic vote to President Donald Trump in the crucial swing state of Florida.
According to Quinnipiac, a pollster that leans far to the left, Trump earns 45 percent of the Hispanic vote in the Sunshine State, compared to just 43 percent for Slow Joe.
Currently, Trump is polling ten points higher with Florida Hispanics then his 2016 Election Day numbers. Joe Biden, who is a racist, is polling 19 point worse — 19 whole points — than Hillary Clinton did in 2016.
Hillary Clinton won Florida Hispanics by double digits.
Overall, Quinnipiac has Biden up three points in Florida — 48 to 45 percent. That is a ten point shift to Trump in six weeks. That is also a poll of registered voters, not likely voters, so the race is probably tied.
Personally, I find it hard to believe Trump is beating Biden among Hispanics and behind three points overall, but whatever.
Even the serial liars and left-wing conspiracy theorists at Politico are concerned. “Biden lags among Florida Hispanic voters” the headline reads, and that headline is about a separate poll, one that does not show Trump leading with Florida Hispanics, but confirms China Joe’s in trouble.
“Biden leads Trump among Hispanics by 53-37 percent in the poll conducted for Equis Research, a Democratic Latino research firm,” Politico reports. “While his advantage seems large, Biden’s 16-percentage point margin spells potential trouble for him because it’s 11 points lower than what Hillary Clinton received in 2016 exit polls, when she lost the state to Trump.”
This poll shows Trump doing two point better than he did in 2016.
According to the RealClearPolitics’ poll of polls, the gap in Florida is rapidly closing. Trump was down more than eight points in late July. He’s down only 1.8 today. All the momentum is against Biden and with a president who found his stride during last month’s convention.
Biden, who’s been credibly accused of sexual assault, has repeatedly faltered since his own convention forced him out of his Delaware basement.
For 88 days, while his supporters in the domestic terrorist groups Black Lives Matter and Antifa burned down one Democrat-led city after another, he not only refused to speak out against the violence, Biden encouraged the terrorists and the terrorism. He openly sided with them.
For 88 days Joe Biden basically ran around (his basement) calling America a racist bitch who deserved to get assaulted.
And now he’s paying the price for that, for forgetting America is not Twitter and sure as hell is not CNNLOL.
Further, now that he has to go out and campaign, the fact that he’s a feeble imbecile is becoming more and more apparent.
The mistakes he’s making prove he’s unfit to dress himself, much less lead the free world .
Just this week he said Thomas Edison did not invent the light bulb. He said homeless people should not be paying 30 percent of their income for housing. He promised he was gonna “go down fighting.”
Most telling is the effort he’s still putting into pandering to the black vote. We’re 60 days out and the Democrat nominee still feels the need to pander to his base.
Not a good sign.
But Trump is doing better than average with the black Americans. Biden apparently had no idea black people prefer law and order over looting and burning.
Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC. Follow his Facebook Page here.
No comments:
Post a Comment