BIDEN HAS VOWED THAT HIS GLOBALIST POLICIES WILL BE OPEN BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX AND AMNESTY FOR 40 MILLION MEXICANS SO THEY MAY LEGALLY BRING UP THE REST OF MEXICO AND VOTE DEM FOR MORE.
HIGHLY
GRAPHIC IMAGES OF AMERICA UNDER LA RAZA MEX OCCUPATION
This
is what America will look like with continued open borders with Narcomex. That
is the agenda of the Globalist Democrat party for endless hordes of ‘cheap’
labor.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/10/america-la-raza-mexicos-wide-open.html
JAMES WALSH
THE OBAMA-BIDEN-HOLDER HISPANICAZATION of AMERICA… first ease millions of illegals over our borders and into our voting
booths!
How the Democrat party surrendered America to Mexico:
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2014/07/james-walsh-hispanicazation-of-america.html
“The watchdogs at Judicial Watch
discovered documents that reveal how the Obama administration's close
coordination with the Mexican government entices Mexicans to hop over the fence
and on to the American dole.” Washington Times
"This is country belongs to Mexico" is said by the Mexican Militant. This is a common teaching that the U.S. is really AZTLAN, belonging to Mexicans, which is taught to Mexican kids in Arizona and California through a LA Raza educational program funded by American Tax Payers via President Obama, when he gave LA RAZA $800,000.00 in March of 2009!
The “zero tolerance” program was dismantled by Attorney General Erc Holder once it had successfully cut the transit of migrants by roughly 95 percent. Initially, officials made 140,000 arrests per year in the mid-2000s, but the northward flow dropped so much that officials only had to make 6,000 arrests in 2013, according to a 2014 letter by two pro-migration Senators, Sen. Jeff Flake and John McCain.
“The cost of the Dream Act is far bigger than the Democrats or their media allies admit. Instead of covering 690,000 younger illegals now enrolled in former President Barack Obama’s 2012 “DACA” amnesty, the Dream Act would legalize at least 3.3 million illegals, according to a pro-immigration group, the Migration Policy Institute.”
Obama
Quietly Erasing Borders (Article)
Article Link:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=240045
WIKILEAKS EXPOSES THE OBAMA CONSPIRACY TO FLOOD AMERICAN WITH DEM VOTING ILLEGALS
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/wikileaks-exposed-obamas-la-raza-open.html
“The watchdogs at Judicial Watch discovered documents that reveal how the Obama administration's close coordination with the Mexican government entices Mexicans to hop over the fence and on to the American dole.” Washington Times
Obama Funds the Mexican Fascist Party of LA RAZA “The Race”… now
calling itself UNIDOSus.
"This is country belongs to Mexico" is said by the
Mexican Militant. This is a common teaching that the U.S. is really AZTLAN,
belonging to Mexicans, which is taught to Mexican kids in Arizona and
California through a LA Raza educational program funded by American Tax Payers
via President Obama, when he gave LA RAZA $800,000.00 in March of 2009!
Previous generations of immigrants did not believe they were
racially superior to Americans. That is the view of La Raza
Cosmica, by Jose Vasconcelos, Mexico’s former education minister
and a presidential candidate. According to this book, republished in
1979 by the Department of Chicano Studies at Cal State LA,
students of Scandinavian, Dutch and English background are
dullards, blacks are ugly and inferior, and those “Mongols” with the
slanted eyes lack enterprise. The superior new “cosmic” race of
Spaniards and Indians is replacing them, and all Yankee “Anglos.”
LLOYD BILLINGSLEY/ FRONTPAGE mag
GLOBALIST BARACK OBAMA AND
NANCY PELOSI’S CONSPIRACY TO
SABOTAGE HOMELAND SECURITY AND
KEEP AMERICA FLOODED WITH DEM
VOTING ILLEGALS
https://globalistbarackobama.blogspot.com/2018/12/nancy-pelosi-and-obama-soros-globalist.html
"Along with Obama, Biden, Pelosi and Schumer are responsible for incalculable damage done to this country over the eight years of that administration." PATRICIA McCARTHY
“One of the most
disgusting things to come out of the Obama administration was "Operation
Fast and Furious," where members of the Department of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives (ATF) allowed illegal gun sales to go through –
commonly referred to as "gun walking" – in order to track buyers and
sellers they believed were connected to the Mexican drug cartels. Nearly 2,000
firearms were sold and were eventually found throughout the United States and
Mexico. Two of them were used to k ill Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry.” BETH BAUMANN
The “zero tolerance”
program was dismantled by Attorney General Erc Holder once it had
successfully cut the transit of migrants by roughly 95 percent.
Initially, officials made 140,000 arrests per year in the mid-2000s, but the
northward flow dropped so much that officials only had to make 6,000 arrests in
2013, according to a 2014 letter by two
pro-migration Senators, Sen. Jeff Flake and John McCain.
Jose Angel Gutierrez, professor, University of Texas, Arlington and founder of La Raza Unida political party screams at rallies: "We have an aging white America. They are dying. They are s hitting in their pants with fear! I love it! We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to k ill him!"
Joe Biden: ‘Absolutely Bizarre’ to Suggest Limit on U.S. Capacity to Absorb Immigrants
LAS VEGAS, Nevada — Former Vice President Joe Biden campaigned
inside a Chinese restaurant on Tuesday evening, telling supporters it was
“bizarre” to suggest a limit on immigration to the U.S.
Biden promised to expand immigration to the U.S. if elected
president.
“Folks, look — the idea that there’s some limitation on the
capacity of anyone who — on the immigrants in this country is absolutely
bizarre! It’s absolutely bizarre.”
Biden, speaking to a packed crowd inside the Harbor Palace
Seafood Restaurant on the eve of the next Democratic debate, addressed members
of the Asian-American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) community, urging them to
turn out the vote ahead of Saturday’s caucuses.
Last month, the AAPI Victory Fund super PAC endorsed Biden for president, citing his ability to defeat
President Donald Trump and his experience working with immigrant communities
from South Asia, East Asia and the Pacific generally.
Though the AAPI immigrant community is politically diverse, it
has trended Democratic in recent years.
Last year, Breitbart News reported, another local AAPI
organization in Las Vegas expressed opposition to President
Trump’s proposed merit-based system for legal immigration.
On Tuesday, Biden promised, if elected, to allow family
reunification visas.
“We should be able to increase, to three million people, the
people who could come for family reunification. Period, period, period,
period.”
He called the idea that the U.S. could not “reunite” more
families “absolutely bizarre.”
Biden also reminded his audience that Latinos were not the only
beneficiaries of President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood
Arrivals (DACA) program, which applied to those brought to the country
illegally as children.
He said there were “thousands and thousands of AAPI ‘Dreamers'”
who had benefited from DACA as well.
Afterwards, Biden greeted attendees, some of whom proceeded to
the Chinatown Mall to cast early votes before the polling place there closed.
Biden hopes to finish in the top three in Nevada, and to win
South Carolina on Feb. 29, to make the case that he is still a top contender
for his party’s nomination. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) now leads national
polls, as well as Nevada polls.
Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. He earned an A.B. in Social Studies and Environmental Science and Public Policy from Harvard College, and a J.D. from Harvard Law School. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. He is also the co-author of How Trump Won: The Inside Story of a Revolution, which is available from Regnery. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.
So Biden wants to change immigration rules in the middle of a pandemic?
According to news reports, wannabe president-elect Biden intends to undo much of the good work that President Trump did on immigration. This is from CBS:
After Mr. Biden is sworn-in in January, his administration will move to fully restore an Obama-era program that shields 640,000 undocumented immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as children from deportation, halting Mr. Trump's unsuccessful efforts to end it, people familiar with the plans told CBS News. The incoming administration also intends to rescind Mr. Trump's travel and immigration restrictions on 13 mostly African or predominantly Muslim countries.
Mr. Biden will look to implement a 100-day freeze on deportations while his administration issues guidance narrowing who can be arrested by immigration agents. Obama-era memos that prioritized the deportation of immigrants with criminal convictions, recent border-crossers and those who entered the country illegally more than once were scrapped in 2017 by Mr. Trump so that no unauthorized immigrant would be exempted from being arrested and removed from the country.
Well, let's see how far he gets in the middle of a pandemic.
First, there is the health issue. Are we going to test all of these people at the border before they cross?
Second, has anyone consulted with President Andrés López-Obrador of Mexico? Is he ready for more caravans in the middle of a pandemic? The caravans will come if the word gets out that the rules are loosened up.
What about the U.S. Senate and House? Does Biden think that the legislators are just going to sit back and watch all of this?
So we will see. My guess is that Biden is throwing a bone to the left.
DURING OBOMB'S 8 YEAR BANKSTER REGIME, HE AND BANKSTER-LAWYER
ERIC HOLDER SABOTAGED HOMELAND SECURITY, VOTING AND AMERICA'S BORDERS TO FLOOD
AMERICA WITH DEM VOTING MEXICANS.
OBOMB OPERATED AND FUNDED
THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY OF LA RAZA 'The Race' NOW CALLING ITSELF UNIDOSus OUT
OF THE WHITE HOUSE.
Unlimited immigration. Obama issued an unconstitutional executive order – an action he repeated routinely to counter Congressional action – that instituted mass immigration of poor, uneducated third-world people into the U.S., not to assimilate with our culture but to keep their own and demand that U.S. taxpayers subsidize them. Deportations of illegal immigrants under the new policy were dramatically reduced, even as scores more poured across the southern border as the number of border patrol agents decreased.
The Unhinging of
America
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/08/the_unhinging_of_america.html
Since
my return from the war in Korea (1950-53) I have witnessed America sink into a
state of insanity unknown in its history:
Kids
shooting classmates at school, people like zombies gazing at little screens
while they walk, stand, sit, shop, talk, drive cars, watch TV telling them what
to think, women blaming men for not being treated like men, men having their
genitals “replaced with vaginas,” women leaving dependent children behind to
join the military, mothers having their babies killed when they are ready to be
born . . .
By
the 1980s the moral and cultural swamp that America was sinking into made me
wave red flags in newsletters I published. The acceleration toward and past the
turn of the century has been breathless! Many Americans have wondered what
happened to America?
Well,
to begin with, anti-American activists have pushed hard to fulfill a mission
launched by early 20th century Marxists to establish a new world order. It
would be a God-free world under a global government run by amoral men smarter
than everybody else in the world, past and present. Soon after the start of the
21st century, Barack Obama, latest edition of this breed of visionary,
positioned himself to lead the team in Washington to help “transform America” –
make it ready, that is, for the new world order.
There
has never been a place in my mind for anyone in public office who would harm
America and the people he or she is elected or appointed to serve, which is the
inevitable consequence of pushing for a moral-free, God-free world. Such
action, no matter how packaged, serves evil. They who use
their talents to harm their fellow human beings – they’re known as traitors –
are placed by Dante in the deepest circle of hell [Inferno].
Now
there was someone who wanted to be president who could and would utilize
Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals – a book that salutes the devil
in its opening pages – to take down America, while pretending to make it better
than ever!
Could
Obama in truth and honesty have, as president, served “one nation under God,
with liberty and justice for all”? Could he have been sincere when he took the
oath to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States”? I
don’t think so.
My
worst fear, that Americans might lose their country if they did not stand up to
and shout down the God-haters and Leftists undermining their country – what
culture warriors have been fighting for decades – seemed closer than ever to
becoming a reality.
Among
the warriors “with balls” who saw what was happening, the firebrand Andrew
Breitbart rallied converts and fighters against political traitors scheming to
destroy America, a first step in establishing their New World Order. (I called
it Global Oz.) By the time Breitbart crashed into media and news reporting, a
bloated and flabby federal government had enabled the anti-American Obama to
run for president. Breitbart was ruthless in exposing this two-faced candidate
for president. Shortly after he pledged to release a video showing college-age
Obama alongside notorious Weather Underground terrorists, Breitbart died in Los
Angeles.
And
so a treacherous candidate for president beat a “she’s-not-fit-to-be-president”
(Obama.’s words) Hillary Clinton to the White House. Well, Hillary became part
of the “America-transforming" team as Secretary of State and Obama, with solemn
face and ready platitude, repeated the lie that he would unify America and
transform it into a better place for all.
The
deeds did not match the words. Regarding unity, Obama stoked the fires of
racial division, using his bully pulpit to turn every news event that could be
spun into “discrimination against blacks” into an official denunciation of
racism. And the corporate media did their part to help bring about a hatred of
cops that heedlessly endangered the lives of men and women who daily put their
lives on the line to ensure the safety of a public increasingly divided.
Regarding
improving the lives of all, the following overview of Obama’s “transformation
of America” is based on “The 10 Ways Obama has actively sought to destroy
America” by J. D. Heyes (Natural News, December 25, 2015):
ObamaCare was
sold on false pretenses by people who knew it wouldn’t work as promised. Failed
scheme or intentional failure? The bill was so sloppily crafted that Democrats
were basically signing blank sheets of paper when they rushed it through
Congress. [“We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what’s in it,”
said Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi.] ObamaCare’s designers precipitated a
constitutional crisis with a provision to cut subsidies for states that didn’t
set up health-care exchanges – a provision that would have killed the entire
program stone-dead if it had been enforced as written. And whoever was
uninsured that did not enroll had to pay an annual penalty fee!
Unlimited
immigration. Obama issued an unconstitutional
executive order – an action he repeated routinely to counter Congressional
action – that instituted mass immigration of poor, uneducated third-world
people into the U.S., not to assimilate with our culture but to keep their own
and demand that U.S. taxpayers subsidize them. Deportations of illegal
immigrants under the new policy were dramatically reduced, even as scores more
poured across the southern border as the number of border patrol agents
decreased.
The
Constitution. Obama was a bigger enemy of our
founding document than any president in history. Acting dictatorially, Obama
unconstitutionally “legislated by executive order” whenever his will was in
conflict with that of Congress or the constitution. [His “liberal” activist
judges would back him up, if needed.]
Military
madness. Obama pushed social experimentation
in the military to a level that could cause lasting damage, such as permitting
people to serve who have no idea what sex they are, and allowing women to serve
in combat roles despite increases in injuries, mental health issues,
effectiveness and morale problems.
Packing
the federal courts. Obama “packed” the federal court for
the D.C. Circuit with activist, like-minded judges [who place themselves above the
Law of the Land they are charged to uphold].
Economic
damage. Obama issued more regulations than
any president before him, with tens of billions in burdensome new costs such as
those incurred by the expensive EPA regulations. His packed D.C. Circuit ruled
against states suing to get those rules tossed.
Changes
to society. Obama’s open-border policy and unlimited importation of
third-world poor and Middle Eastern “refugees” [a gateway to anti-American
terrorists] could change the face of the country, culturally and economically.
To
object to any of this insanity is a way to get hit with a legal penalty.
The
founders of our country and its legion of heroes surely tossed and turned in
their graves over the America they had struggled, sacrificed, and died for.
If
there is a silver lining to the dark clouds hanging over America it is the hope
that the young of every description will turn on the mindless haters of America
and launch a course correction. A reset for any semblance of progress starts
with a return to the Constitution and the forces that inspired it, which
include age-independent Judeo-Christian wisdom.
Anthony J. DeBlasi is a veteran and lifelong defender of Western
culture.
Image
credit: Abductit, via
Flickr // CC BY-SA 2.0
Biden and the Immigration Trap
'Uncle Joe' Agonistes
By Andrew R. Arthur on May 21, 2020
On Tuesday, the Washington Post ran an article detailing the struggles confronting
the campaign of presumptive Democratic nominee for president Joe Biden with
respect to immigration. There are a few things that the article leaves out, but
it is notable (and somewhat shocking) for what it contains. What it ultimately
shows is that the former vice president is boxed into an immigration trap.
Specifically, the
article details the competing forces that are pulling "Uncle Joe" on
immigration as he seeks to wrest the White House from Donald Trump (whose
immigration stance, the paper admits, helped propel him to the presidency in
2016).
On the one side is the
presumptive candidate's desire to capture the votes of white blue-collar voters
in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin (all won by Trump in the last
election), while on the other is his need to turn out the Hispanic vote,
particularly in Florida and Arizona. The article states that Latino voters
"are expected to become the country's largest nonwhite voting bloc this
fall."
Although the Post
alludes to Biden's immigration proposals (which are somewhat out there, as I have
described here, here, and here), and discusses his more outré ideas, such as suspending deportations
for his first 100 days in office and then deporting only felons
(which would essentially nullify much of the Immigration and Nationality Act),
the Post simultaneously fails to note that those proposals would likely not
resound with much of the voting populace, while at the same time contending
that these policies don't go far enough for "significant segments of his own
party".
Those
"segments" are, the paper contends, clamoring for Biden to commit to
"removing criminal penalties for those who cross the border illegally,
removing barriers from the border [,and] abolishing Immigration and Customs
Enforcement." There is likely a reason that Biden does not want to talk
about those ideas on the campaign trail.
Polls don't show
support for Biden positions
Polling from August 2018 — when the "Abolish ICE" fever was likely cresting — showed only 24 percent of
voters supported the idea, with Democrats, Republicans, and independents
staking out that position about equally. Some 40 percent disagreed, while 34
percent had no opinion.
Not to say that
Democrats wildly supported the agency — 57 percent of Democrats had an
unfavorable view of ICE, with an equal percentage of Republicans in favor of
it, and 46 percent of independents took no view. Many of those opposed to
abolition but who also don't like ICE likely were concerned about the law of
unintended consequences, and by May 2019 Buzzfeed News reported: "'Abolish ICE' Was The Call Of Last
Summer. 2020 Democrats Have Moved On".
Further, in July
2019, The Hill noted that a poll found "a plurality of voters,
41 percent, thought those crossing the border illegally should face criminal
punishment, while 32 percent said it should just warrant a fine." With
respect to independents, 36 percent favored criminal penalties, while "33
percent ... think it should be treated as a misdemeanor, with just a fine as
punishment."
I note that this
response shows a certain misapprehension of the current state of the law (initial illegal entry is already a misdemeanor, with a
fine as an optional but rarely, if ever, imposed punishment, and most of those
prosecuted are sentenced merely to time served while awaiting prosecution),
suggesting that even those voters — if they knew the facts — would actually
want stricter punishment than most aliens who have entered illegally already
receive. No wonder the former vice president does not want to discuss the
issue, let alone make it a key point for his campaign.
On barriers at the
border, the polling is a bit more mixed. In February 2019, Gallup reported that six in 10 Americans opposed a border
wall, but that poll was taken directly after a bruising government shutdown
that largely focused on the issue. I will note that last Monday, KXAN (the NBC affiliate in Austin, Texas) released a poll
showing that excitement for Donald Trump in Texas swamped enthusiasm for Biden
in the Lone Star State. Most significantly:
When broken down by
party, 19.5% of Democrats said they were extremely excited about Biden and 22.6
said they were "not that excited." Meanwhile, 49.4% of Republicans
said they were "extremely excited" about supporting Trump and 9.5%
reported they were not that excited about him.
Texas and Arizona are currently the primary sites for new border wall
construction, and if Texans were that opposed to what is and has been the
president's key immigration proposal, it would likely be reflected in their
lack of enthusiasm. It does not seem to have moved the needle, however, or if
it did, it is in Trump's favor.
I will note that I
spoke on the issue in a debate in February before a largely liberal crowd, and
opposition to the wall was an applause point (from an audience that all but
defined the "Dunning-Kruger Effect" on the issue), but a lot has changed in three months.
The Post itself reported on April 28 that 65 percent of Americans were in favor of a
temporary suspension in immigration during the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic, with
34 percent opposed.
Polling found that 83
percent of Republicans and 67 percent of independents were in favor of
temporary restrictions, and Democrats were split 49-49 on the issue.
Significantly, 67 percent of whites, 61 percent of "nonwhites"
(presumably including Latinos), and a majority of 18- to 29-year-olds were in
favor. Now again, "temporary suspensions on immigration" and
"border wall construction" are two different things, but an influx of
illegal entrants during the (traditional) illegal travel season of April to December while lockdowns are still in
place could tie the two issues in voters' minds, and gubernatorial inter-state travel
restrictions may have done so
already.
And voters stuck at
home as a result of Wuhan coronavirus restrictions could be only temporarily
less inclined to support the entry of aliens, legal or otherwise. That said,
the transit of the illness from China could give them pause to take a slightly more
charitable view toward Donald Trump's opposition to open borders.
Sound tough on China,
or not?
Lest you think I am
casting aspersions with respect to the last point (I am not, and consider
anyone who blames any American — citizen or immigrant — for the virus to be an
idiot), I am really just channeling the former vice president. The Post article on Biden notes: "Some were alarmed when the
Biden campaign began airing an ad in battleground states that accused Trump of
having 'rolled over for the Chinese' amid the pandemic and 'let in 40,000
travelers from China.'" That is an apt description of the response to that
ad on the part of progressives.
In particular, an April
23 Politico article captioned "Biden ad exposes a rift over China
on the left: The former vice president's effort to hit Trump as soft on Beijing
is backfiring among parts of his base" states:
Joe Biden's effort to
outflank President Donald Trump on China is leading to blowback from within his
own political base.
Some worry the rhetoric
in a new Biden campaign ad could spur anti-Asian bias already on the rise
because of the coronavirus pandemic. Others argue that Biden's effort to sound
tougher on China than Trump could backfire diplomatically in the long run.
...
"I acknowledge and
understand the need and desire to defeat and beat Trump, however, my question
is 'Who is the Biden campaign willing to sacrifice along that way?'" said
Timmy Lu, executive director of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders for Civic
Empowerment.
So why did Biden
release the ad? Because he was in a box over his earlier statements criticizing
the president for his response to the Wuhan coronavirus the day that the White
House announced restrictions on travel from the People's Republic of China.
Specifically, Biden, campaigning in Iowa, stated: "This is no time for
Donald Trump's record of hysteria and xenophobia — hysterical xenophobia — and
fearmongering to lead the way instead of science." (Curiously, the YouTube link to the video of those comments states: "Video
unavailable, This video has been removed by the uploader." Hmmm.)
The Post notes that Biden has sought insight into handling the
issue of immigration as a candidate from, among others, Sen. Robert Casey
(D-Pa.). Casey fought off Republican Lou Barletta — an immigration hawk — in a
2018 challenge for Casey's senate seat, and:
He urged Biden to
emphasize the economic benefits of immigration while pledging to secure the
southern border to keep drugs and criminals out.
"You have to make
it very clear that you stand for border security — and not just that you stand
for it, but that you voted for it," Casey said, citing past measures that
have won Democratic backing.
But, at the same time,
he said most voters want an immigration system that is humane and fair. The
separation of families at the border was a wake-up call for some voters, Casey
said.
I am not sure how that
border security advice squares with Biden's promise that
"the only deportations that will take place" under his administration
"are commissions of felonies in the United States of America"
(meaning that Mexican cartel members who enter illegally will not be deported,
for example), but for some reason the Post fails to mention the discrepancy.
That said, such advice
is easier given to the former vice president than it will be swallowed by the
American people, because of Biden's record.
I would posit initially
that recommendations like Casey's are likely the reason that Biden's immigration proposals begin:
It is a moral failing
and a national shame when a father and his baby daughter drown seeking our
shores. When children are locked away in overcrowded detention centers and the
government seeks to keep them there indefinitely. When our government argues in
court against giving those children toothbrushes and soap. When President Trump
uses family separation as a weapon against desperate mothers, fathers, and
children seeking safety and a better life.
The
Obama-Biden administration's record
Again, easily said. It
will, however, be very difficult for Biden to distance himself from some very
similar policies enacted under the "Obama-Biden administration".
There is likely a
reason why Biden does not (directly) fall back on the "kids in cages" trope that has become a standard for tendentious
discussions of immigration by political hacks. As I have previously noted:
Snopes (not exactly a
Trump-friendly outlet) examined the following fact: "The Obama
administration, not the Trump administration, built the cages that hold many
immigrant children at the U.S.-Mexico border." They deemed that statement
"true", explaining:
Pictures of children
behind chain-link fencing were captured at a site in McAllen, Texas, that had
been converted from a warehouse to an immigrant-detention facility in 2014.
Social media users who defended Trump's immigration policies also shared a 2014
photograph of Obama's Homeland Security Secretary, Jeh Johnson, touring a
facility in Nogales, Arizona, in 2014, in which the fencing could be seen
surrounding migrants there as well. That picture was taken during a spike in
the number of unaccompanied children fleeing violence in Central American
countries.
That said, there is a
direct line from "children ... locked away in overcrowded detention
centers and the government [that] seeks to keep them there indefinitely",
who cannot access "toothbrushes and soap" and the decisions of the
previous administration to erect fencing in Border Patrol processing centers to
protect unaccompanied alien children (UACs). One that Biden would likely prefer
to be forgotten.
And a direct line to
the Obama-Biden administration's 2014 "blanket policy to detain all
female-headed families, including children, in secure, unlicensed facilities
for the duration of the proceedings that determine whether they are entitled to
remain in the United States," which prompted Judge Dolly Gee of the U.S. District Court for the Central District
of California to find President Obama's Department of Homeland
Security in breach of the Flores settlement agreement in July
2015.
Plus, as I have previously noted ad nauseam, the fact that UACs were stuck in
the conditions Biden describes had everything to do with Congress's (and
especially congressional Democrats') failure to provide funding Trump and his
acting Homeland Security secretary had sought for more than a month, and
nothing to do with a volitional decision by the administration to keep them
there.
These facts may have
been elided by a compliant press (the Post did not mention them at all in its Biden immigration
piece), but I doubt that they will escape notice during a presidential campaign
when the president and independent interest groups can throw money at ads
highlighting them.
Pandering to Latino
voters
Then, there is the
pandering by Biden and his surrogates themselves. Much of Biden's outreach to
Latino voters appears to focus on immigration, but is that really the most
important issue to those voters?
In a June 2019 survey
by Unidos US, "jobs and the economy" was the most important
issue an ideal candidate would address (23 percent) for 1,854 eligible Latino
voters in Arizona, California, Florida, Nevada, and Texas, followed by
"healthcare" (17 percent) and then "immigration" (15
percent). "Gun violence" (8 percent) and "climate change"
(7 percent) together equaled that total.
BLOG: OBAMA FUNDED AND
OPERATED LA RAZA 'The Race" NOW CALLING ITSELF UNIDOSUS FROM THE WHITE HOUSE.
IT IS A MEX FASCIST ANTI-AMERICAN POLITICAL MOVEMENT FOR SURRENDER OF AMERICA
TO MEXICO.
Unidos US, for those who are not familiar, is the current
incarnation of the "National Council of La Raza", which bills
itself as "the nation's largest Hispanic civil rights and advocacy
organization". Hardly a MAGA front group.
Given these numbers, it
is no surprise that the Atlantic magazine in February stated that 30 percent of
Latino voters support the president, in an opinion piece captioned "Latino Support for Trump Is Real: And
that's a problem for Democrats" (not
to be confused with the outlet's January 2020 article captioned "Democrats Should Be Worried About
the Latino Vote: Political organizers have a warning for the 2020
candidates").
In this vein, in early
May, Slate ran an article captioned "Biden Has a Real Latino
Problem", which stated:
A recent Latino
Decisions poll reveals a clear enthusiasm gap among Latinos for both Biden and
the 2020 election itself, with only 49 percent of registered voters currently
committed to choosing Biden over Trump, and just six out of 10 planning to go
to the polls in November.
That article focuses on
Biden's initial reluctance to distance himself from what the outlet deems
"the controversial immigration policy of the first two years of the Obama administration"
(perhaps too good a sales job by a president whose rhetoric on removals did not
match his actions), and Biden's inability to present himself to Hispanic voters
due to the current pandemic.
Speaking of which,
Slate notes that: "According to the Latino Decisions poll, almost half of
all respondents approve of Trump's handling of the coronavirus crisis, with 47
percent saying Trump was delivering 'clear and helpful' information about the
pandemic." Again, showing that "immigration" is not the only
concern of Hispanic voters.
Back to the pandering,
however. The Post notes that Biden's "wife Jill, who is learning
Spanish while stuck at home by the pandemic, has begun meeting weekly with
small groups of Latino members of Congress, taking notes on a range of issues
to share with her husband" (I don't have the heart to tell her they speak
English), and the article is accompanied by a photo of Biden "at a
campaign stop at King Taco in Los Angeles, with Los Angeles Mayor Eric
Garcetti".
The paper also reports
that "Biden campaign officials have promised to significantly increase
outreach to Latinos and further diversify the staff now that they have raised
more money, although," the Post notes, "they declined to provide
target numbers."
I suppose that a
Spanish-speaking spouse, an ethnically diverse staff, and a documented
hankering for regional cuisine may win Biden some votes, but the fact is he is
stuck in an immigration box.
If he ties himself to
the "Obama-Biden" administration on the issue, it appears that he
will alienate both immigration activists and those who favor the Trump
administration's reversal of those policies. But, if he panders to those
activists, he will likely turn off many of the voters in swing states who
supported Trump in 2016 (and especially those who were swayed by the
now-president's promises of border security and immigration limitations).
A January article in the Post contained a list of
"Bidenisms", folksy aphorisms that the candidate uses on the stump.
One is: "My dad had an expression ... 'Joey, don't compare me to the
Almighty, compare me to the alternative.''' Most voters already know that the
president has his flaws and imperfections, but once voters get to know Biden's
immigration record and his proposals, they may pull the level for Trump as the
better alternative.
Pollak:
Barack Obama Himself Was the Threat to the Rule of LawAP
Photo/Hassan Ammar
Former President Barack Obama warned Friday that the “rule of law is at risk” because former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn will no longer be prosecuted.
Obama’s remarks, leaked from a private conference
call with members of something called the “Obama Alumni Association,” show a
breathtaking lack of self-awareness.
Obama himself was the threat to the rule of
law, both during his presidency and as it ended.
As Breitbart News has
previously noted, Obama routinely violated the
Constitution’s separation of powers, challenging America’s constitutional
foundation in a way no president before him had done in peacetime.
“I’ve got a pen, and I’ve got a
phone,” Obama said, threatening to use — and
abuse — his executive power — rather than allow the constitutional process of
legislation to proceed.
Here are just a few of Obama’s more egregious
violations:
- Refusing to submit
the Iran deal to the Senate for ratification
- Declaring the Senate
in recess when it was not (struck down, later, in a 9-0 Supreme
Court decision)
- Defying the
courts when told to renew oil and gas activity in the Gulf
of Mexico, or to stop giving amnesty to illegal aliens
- Threatening the
Supreme Court after Citizens
United, and before the Obamacare decision
- Altering Obamacare’s
statutory deadline unilaterally
- Creating the Deferred
Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and Deferred Action for Parents of
Americans (DAPA) programs after admitting it
was unconstitutional
- Trying to wipe out
the coal industry
Moreover, the Flynn
investigation itself undermined the rule of law by targeting a man the
government knew was innocent of any crime. Similarly, Obama’s own effort to protect Hillary
Clinton, and his administration’s attempt to undermine Trump through false
allegations of “Russia collusion,” also violated the rule of law.
Last week it emerged that it was Obama himself
who told then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates about Flynn’s lawful conversation with
the Russian ambassador, which set the investigative wheels in motion.
Obama’s phony protest suggests
he is feeling desperate as attention turns, finally, to his own role in the affair.
Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and
the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday
evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). His new book, RED NOVEMBER, is available for pre-order. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert
Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.
Biden’s Coronavirus Plan: Catch and Release Border Crossers into U.S.
508David McNew/Getty Images
1 May 20201,989
3:45
Presumptive 2020 Democrat
presidential nominee Joe Biden is suggesting a restart of the nation’s “Catch
and Release” program in the midst of the coronavirus crisis. The policy would
ensure thousands of border crossers are readily released into the United
States.
This week, during an interview
with Florida local media, Biden suggested a return to the previous,
decades-long policy of catching and releasing border crossers into the U.S. as
they await their asylum hearings despite public health concerns over the coronavirus.
“You’ve never seen a time where
someone seeking asylum has to seek it from another country,” Biden said when
asked about his immigration plan in the middle of the coronavirus crisis.
“You’ve never seen a circumstance where we put people in cages. We have to take
stock of where we are.”
Biden’s plan would ensure that
thousands of border crossers who have arrived at the U.S.-Mexico border since
President Trump’s shutdown of the region would be
released into the country while they await their asylum hearings — the majority
of which take years to hold.
Today, Trump’s “Remain in
Mexico” policy coupled with the border shutdown has allowed federal immigration
officials to swiftly return border crossers to Mexico in an average of 96 minutes. The policy means border
crossers from Mexico and Central America are processed and immediately returned
to Mexico without setting foot in the U.S. interior.
As Breitbart News reported,
federal immigration officials have said that as of April 10, Trump’s policy had
successfully returned 10,000 border crossers to Mexico.
Analysis conducted by the Center for
Economic and Policy Research shows a continued flow of border crossers being
returned to their native countries in recent weeks.
From March 15 to April 24, ICE
Air appears to have made 21 deportation flights to Guatemala; 18 to Honduras;
12 to El Salvador; six to Brazil; three each to Nicaragua, Ecuador, Haiti, and
the Dominican Republic; and one each to Colombia and Jamaica…
…
Over the last 12 weeks, it
appears that ICE has used 22 unique charter planes for 232 likely deportation
flights. Of those planes, 15 participated in confirmed ICE Air deportation
flights between October 2018 and May 2019, the most recent data compiled by
UWCHR.
Biden’s plan, though, would
reverse such measures, halting deportations except for convicted felon illegal
aliens and allowing those arriving at the border to await their asylum hearings
in the U.S. interior with the hopes that they show up to court.
The plan proposed by Biden
comes even as public health concerns have circulated around border crossers
arriving at the southern border. This week, an illegal alien from India tested positive for coronavirus after he
snuck across the border into California with a group of Mexican nationals.
Likewise, data from Guatemalan
officials have said about 50 to 75 percent of all migrants returned to
Guatemala from the U.S. have tested positive for coronavirus.
Under Biden’s plan, each of
these border crossers would be in a federal immigration facility or already
released into the U.S. interior.
Trump’s Remain in Mexico policy
has decimated asylum fraud. In the first few months of its implementation, the
policy ensured that zero of 1,200 total border crossers
ineligible for asylum in Mexico had been released into the U.S. interior.
Most recent reports have indicated that the
Remain in Mexico policy has a less than one percent asylum-grant rate.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on
Twitter at @JxhnBinder.
Obama: DACA Illegal
Aliens Deserve Amnesty During Coronavirus Crisis
Former President Barack Obama says the time is now, during the
Chinese coronavirus crisis, to provide amnesty to about 3.5 million illegal
aliens who are enrolled and eligible for the Deferred Action for Childhood
Arrivals (DACA) program.
While about ten million Americans have
filed for unemployment in just three weeks, Obama took to Twitter to call for
an amnesty for DACA illegal aliens in the midst of the coronavirus crisis.
“Dreamers have contributed so much to our country, and they are
risking their lives fighting on the frontlines of this pandemic,” Obama said.
“They deserve permanent immigration status and a pathway to citizenship—as they
are Americans in every way but on paper.”
Dreamers have contributed so much to our country, and they are risking their lives fighting on the frontlines of this pandemic. They deserve permanent immigration status and a pathway to citizenship—as they are Americans in every way but on paper. https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/dreamers-risk-lives-on-pandemics-front-lines-while-they-await-court-ruling/2020/04/11/d34a7b58-76c4-11ea-85cb-8670579b863d_story.html …
‘Dreamers’ risk lives on pandemic’s front lines while they
await a decision on their own futures
23K people are talking about this
Center for Immigration Studies Research Director Steven
Camarotta has noted that DACA illegal aliens make up about 0.2 percent of the
nation’s nearly 15 million healthcare workers. In New York, where a staggering
number of DACA illegal aliens reside, they still only account for about 0.2
percent of the state’s healthcare workers, according to Camarotta.
Obama’s lobbying for a DACA amnesty in the middle of the
coronavirus crisis comes as House Democrats — including Congressional Hispanic
Caucus Chair Joaquin Castro (D-TX), Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), and Rep.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) — have sent a letter to the Trump administration demanding DACA illegal aliens
have their work authorizations extended.
“Support of DACA recipients during the current pandemic is
particularly critical as over 200,000 DACA recipients are in occupations and
industry groups that render them ‘essential critical infrastructure workers,’
according to DHS guidance,” the House Democrats wrote in their letter.
A DACA amnesty would put more citizen children of illegal aliens
— known as “anchor babies” — on federal welfare, as Breitbart News reported,
while American taxpayers would be left potentially with
a $26 billion bill.
Additionally, about one-in-five DACA illegal aliens, after
an amnesty, would end up on food stamps, while
at least one-in-seven would go on Medicaid.
Any plan to give amnesty to DACA illegal aliens that does not
also include provisions to halve legal immigration levels — the U.S. admits
about 1.2 million legal immigrants a year at the expense of America’s working
and middle class — would give amnestied illegal aliens the opportunity to bring
an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the country.
At the southern border, a DACA amnesty has the potential to
trigger a border surge that could triple the number of illegal aliens pouring
through the border. Since DACA’s inception, more than 2,100 recipients of the
program have been kicked off because they were found to either be criminals or
gang members.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on
Twitter at @JxhnBinder.
CBS:
Joe Biden to Demolish Legal Wall Against Migration
GUILLERMO ARIAS/AFP via Getty
Images
11 Nov 2020854
6:57
Joe Biden’s team plans to abandon agreements with Central
American countries that created a legal wall against global migrants, according
to CBS News.
The Biden team also hopes to have U.S. embassies fly foreign
children to their migrant parents throughout the United States, according to
the November 11 report. The embassy process would bypass the coyotes and
cartels and allow illegal populations to burrow into U.S. society — much to the
disadvantage of less-skilled Americans.
The CBS report said:
A source familiar with the Biden team’s planning said the
incoming administration will withdraw from the three bilateral agreements Mr.
Trump brokered with Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras that allow the U.S. to
send rejected asylum-seekers to those countries and have them seek refuge
there.
Trump’s diplomatic deals allow U.S. border agencies to easily
and cheaply fly asylum-claiming migrants from Latin American, India, or Africa
back to the safe countries they crossed on their journey to the U.S. border. This
process minimizes migration to the United States by reviving the traditional
rule that requires migrants to ask for asylum in the first safe country they
reach.
The legal wall now includes Honduras, Guatemala, and El
Salvador.
So far, few migrants have been sent back to these countries.
However, Trump’s diplomatic wall — as well as the steel border wall — showed
many millions of would-be migrants that they would not be able to get into U.S.
workplaces by just asking for asylum.
Without Trump’s legal wall, U.S. border agencies may be forced
to admit a growing tide of asylum-seeking Africans, Indians, and South
Americans so they can apply for asylum. The incoming population will likely
cause massive backlogs in U.S. courtrooms, so allowing the migrants to get work
permits for U.S. jobs, so driving down wages for working-class Americans.
Migrant inflows cut wages for unskilled Americans, drive up
their apartment rentals, and crowd the schools needed by their children.
But migrant inflows also provide cheap services for wealthy
Americans, extra consumers for real estate investors, retailers and Wall
Street, and replacement people for cheap labor cities, such as New York.
The proposed revival of President Barack Obama’s Central
American Minors (CAM) program would allow many more emigrants to leave their
kids at home while they sneak into the United States.
CBS reported:
The incoming administration will also look at reinstating an
Obama administration initiative that allowed certain at-risk children in
Central America to request refugee or parole status and reunite with their
families in the U.S. if their parents were authorized to be in the country, the
source said. The Obama administration created the Central American Minors
program in 2014 in response to a rise in border crossings by unaccompanied
migrant children but Mr. Trump ended it in 2017.
Currently, many migrants leave their children at home and use
their wages from U.S. jobs to hire coyotes to deliver their children to the
U.S. border.
Since Obama’s first term, border agencies have relayed the
coyote-delivered children — dubbed “Unaccompanied Alien Children” (UAC) — to
the Department of Health and Human Services. The department then relays the
children to volunteer “sponsors” — usually parents or close relatives of the
foreign children.
For example, roughly 145,000 Guatemalan children and teens have been delivered through
coyote/agency “UAC pipeline” to homes in the United States since 2009. During
the same period, up to 550,000 Guatemalan adults and children were allowed into
the United States.
In 2014, the flood of UAC migrants overwhelmed Obama’s border
agencies, generate a media storm, and wrecked his poll ratings. His deputies
quickly created the CAM program to help deliver the migrant children while
minimizing media coverage. In 2015, Breitbart reported:
According to officials at the State Department and U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services, as of Monday the Obama administration has
received 4,253 applications for the CAM program. So far only 90 applicants have
been interviewed.
Out of the 90 interviews, the last step in the application
adjudication process, 12 percent have been approved for refugee status and 84
percent have been recommended for parole. That means at least 96 percent of the
adjudicated applicants will be coming to the U.S., as less than one percent
have been affirmatively denied.
The CAM children would only be delivered to migrants who are
“authorized to be in the country,” according to CBS.
But that term can be very broad. For example, it can include
economic migrants who are appealing for asylum to stay in the United States, as
well as migrants whose asylum or deportation cases were set aside because of
the logjam.
Overall, Biden’s 220 migration plan would reverse many of
Trump’s pro-American policies.
He promised to “reassert America’s commitment to asylum-seekers and
refugees” to wipe out Trump’s asylum reforms, bar any deportations for 100
days, and end migration enforcement against illegal aliens unless
they commit a felony.
Biden also promised to let companies import more visa workers, let mayors import temporary workers, and allow an unlimited flow of foreign
graduates through U.S. universities into white-collar jobs. He would “exempt from any cap [the] recent graduates of Ph.D. programs
in STEM fields.”
Biden also wants to accelerate the inflow of chain migration migrants and dramatically
accelerate the inflow of poor refugees to at least 125,000 per year.
Overall, open-ended legal migration is praised by business and
progressives partly because migrants’ arrivals help transfer wealth from wage-earners to stockholders.
Migration moves money from employees to employers, from families to investors, from young to old, from children to their parents, from homebuyers to real estate investors, and from the central states to the coastal states.
Migration also allows investors and CEOs to skimp on labor-saving technology, sideline U.S. minorities, ignore disabled people, exploit stoop labor in the fields, short-change labor in the cities, impose tight control and pay cuts on American professionals, corral technological innovation by minimizing the employment of American grads, undermine labor rights, and even get many progressive journalists to cheerlead for Wall Street’s priorities.
Biden claims the US is a 'nation of immigrants.'
So Guatemala's gov't want him to grant a quasi-amnesty to 700K+ Guatemalan
migrants.
Next up: Honduras, El Salvador, India ..
Ideal for Biden's donors .. b/c migration moves money from workers to Wall
St. https://t.co/FHHsAncVSz
— Neil Munro (@NeilMunroDC) November 11, 2020
Guatemala Asks for U.S. Amnesty for Its 700,000-Plus Migrants
ESTEBAN BIBA/POOL/AFP via Getty Images
10
Nov 2020848
6:23
Guatemala’s
government is asking the U.S. government to let roughly 700,000 Guatemalan
migrants stay in the United States because of massive flooding that has killed
150 people in the poor country.
Reuters reported Guatemala’s plan to ask for Temporary Protected Status
(TPS) for its migrants. If granted, the status would allow Guatemala’s illegal
migrants to stay and work in the United States, regardless of the high
unemployment and low wages among many unskilled Americans:
“The foreign ministry will, over the
course of the week, send the papers to our ambassador in Washington, who will
make the request to the U.S. government,” [Guatemalan President Alejandro]
Giammattei told reporters.
“We don’t know if President Trump
will accept or not but we believe that it is our obligation to request it.”
Guatemala’s government knows that
Trump opposes the TPS program and has ordered the cancellation of TPS for
hundreds of thousands of migrants who have stayed in the United States for
almost two decades.
But the Guatemala request is likely
aimed at Joe Biden, who has promised to welcome poor migrants who simply ask
for asylum, regardless of the painful impact on Americans.
If granted, the governments of
Honduras and El Salvador will also pressure the U.S. government to grant TPS amnesty
to their migrants.
Since 2016, roughly 662,432
Guatemalans were registered while crossing the border. The vast majority used
border loopholes to semi-legally migrate into the United States, usually by
claiming asylum. Few of the migrants have been sent home, even after their
temporary legal status has expired.
The Guatemalan
migrant population includes 278,566 single adults, 294,263 adults with children, plus
another 89,583 children or teens delivered by coyotes at the border from 2016
to 2020.
The 2016 to 2020
number does not include the additional number of Guatemalans who successfully
marched around the border defenses via the desert and scrubland, nor the 30,649
Guatemalan teens or children relayed by the coyotes in 2014 and 2015, nor
the 16,090 Guatemalan teens and children relayed from 2009 to 2013,
nor the 57,160 nationals from Guatemala detained in 2015.
Some Guatemalans
have been sent home, especially in 2020. But because there is no clear list of resident Guatemalans
that would ask for TPS, many additional Guatemalans would likely migrate north
to sneak into the TPS benefit.
The Guatemalan request is being
cheered by white-collar immigration lawyers and elite-left progressives. They
hope to gain from the flood of migrants as it forces down blue-collar wages,
pushes up neighborhood rents, and crowds the non-private schools needed by the
children of blue-c0llar Americans.
“This is not only
exactly the kind of thing that #TPS is supposed to be for, but
something which could significantly reduce
the #immigrationcourt backlog and otherwise provide (temporary)
relief for a significant portion of the U.S. undocumented population,” tweeted
immigration lawyer Matt Cameron.” He continued:
Although not as
simple as a presidential order, restoring & (broadly/creatively)
extending #TPS to other populations is one of any number of things
which this administration can and must get started with on 1/20/21 to begin to
reverse the damage of the Trump yrs.”
This is not only exactly the kind of thing
that #TPS is
supposed to be for, but something which could significantly reduce the #immigrationcourt backlog and otherwise provide (temporary) relief for a significant
portion of the U.S. undocumented populationhttps://t.co/glvG4i1us9
— Matt Cameron (@matt_cam) November 10, 2020
Immigration advocates claim the TPS
is temporary.
However, Trump’s
effort to cancel TPS for roughly 300,000 migrants were delayed and blocked
by multiple judges. Roughly 250,000 people from El Salvador still told TPS status,
19 years after it was awarded following a major earthquake in 2001.
In 2020, Trump expanded the El
Salvadorean TPS status, likely in exchange for El Salvador’s government’s
promise to block other migrants.
TPS advocates also
say the TPS is not an amnesty, even though it provides almost everything short
of citizenship to poor migrants. Many of the El Salvador migrants crossed
into the United States in the 1980s.
Biden’s immigration 2020 plan would reverse many of Trump’s
pro-American migration policies.
He promised to “reassert America’s commitment to asylum-seekers and
refugees” to wipe out Trump’s asylum reforms, bar any deportations for 100
days, and end migration enforcement against illegal aliens unless
they commit a felony.
Biden also promised to let companies import more visa workers, let mayors import temporary workers, and allow an unlimited flow of foreign
graduates through U.S. universities into white-collar jobs. He would “exempt from any cap [the] recent graduates of Ph.D.
programs in STEM fields.”
Biden also wants to accelerate the inflow of chain migration migrants and dramatically
accelerate the inflow of poor refugees to at least 125,000 per year.
Overall, open-ended legal migration is praised by business and
progressives partly because migrants’ arrivals help transfer wealth from
wage-earners to stockholders.
Migration
moves money from employees to employers, from
families to investors, from young
to old, from children to
their parents, from homebuyers to
real estate investors, and from
the central
states to the coastal states.
Migration
also allows investors and
CEOs to skimp on labor-saving
technology, sideline U.S.
minorities, ignore disabled
people, exploit stoop
labor in the fields, short-change
labor in the cities, impose tight
control and pay cuts on
American professionals, corral technological
innovation by minimizing the employment of
American grads, undermine labor rights, and even
get many progressive
journalists to cheerlead for Wall
Street’s priorities.
Hispanics
are the most supportive of immigration shutdown, says WashPo poll
Polling quirk shows the obvious: Immigs want opportunities & their kids to
be full Americans.
You can't get either if 'the land of opportunity' is just a 'nation of
immigrants.'https://t.co/Ad05lnaYNP
— Neil Munro
(@NeilMunroDC) April 29, 2020
No comments:
Post a Comment