WILL
GRIFTER, CHARITY FOUNDATION HUCKSTER AND SOCIOPATH LAWYER HILLARY CLINTON
MURDER JULIAN ASSANGE?
SHE
WANTS HIM DEAD! HIS PROXIMITY TO THE TRUTH THAT COULD PUT CLINTON IN PRISON IS
A SERIOUS THREAT.
“If the Constitution did not forbid cruel and unusual punishment, the sentence I would like to see imposed would place both Bill and Hillary Clinton in the same 8-by-12 cell.”
ROBERT ARVAY – AMERICAN
THINKER com
Obama’s Democratic Party administration launched a furious salvo of denunciations, with then Vice President Joe Biden calling Assange a “high-tech terrorist” and Hilary Clinton reportedly asking, “Can’t we just drone this guy?” This opened the floodgates to a torrent of demands from Republicans and the right-wing media for his assassination.
THEIR AGENDA IS BILLIONS OF DOLLARS INTO THE WAR MONGER AND THEIR LOBBYIST POCKETS WHILE PERPETRATING OPEN AND UNDEFENDED BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX.
This is because despite all its declarations, the Democratic Party is not a party of workers. It, as Biden’s transition team attests, is a party of Wall Street, big banks, Amazon, and the military-industrial complex.
Amazon is
entangled not only with Wall Street, but also with the US military and
intelligence apparatus. Amazon was awarded a $600 million contract with the CIA
in 2013, followed by a $10 billion contract with the Department of Defense last
year to move government data onto the cloud. Meanwhile, Amazon’s
facial-identification software “Rekognition” is being marketed to federal and
local police.
Biden is bringing the warmongers back to the White House
For
almost all of the Bush administration, Democrats were the anti-war party. They
took to the streets, to the airwaves, to the print media, wherever they could,
to tout their anti-message.
During
Obama’s presidency, the anti-war cohort vanished, even as he dropped bombs,
created terrorist groups, started wars, and triggered mass refugee movements.
Then
came Trump, a truly anti-war president who was the first president in decades
not to start a war. With Biden now the AP's declared president, leftists are
openly thrilled about the military-industrial complex moving into the White
House.
BLOG EDITOR: READ THE
BOOK HOUSE OF BUSH, HOUSE OF SAUD. BUSH AND HIS CORRUPT FAMILY HAS BEEN ON THE
TAKE FROM THE 9-11 INVADERS FOR 50 YEARS!
President
George W. Bush was the last of the Wilson Doctrine presidents: He believed that
America could “make the world safe for democracy” by sending her blood and gold
overseas to kill totalitarian dictators. Of course, he didn’t spell it out in
such simple terms, but that was the gist of his belief that you could end
Islamic terrorism by bringing Western-style democracy to the Middle East.
In
retrospect, it was a dumb idea or, at least, it was a failed idea. The reason
we were able to use war to bring democracy to Japan, Italy, and Germany was
because, by WWII’s end, we had blasted those countries into dust and were able
to rebuild them from the ground up. In addition, we left our troops in place to
keep an eye on things for the next 75 years.
In
both Afghanistan and Iraq, America didn’t fight to win. Instead, she repeated
the mistake from Vietnam, which was to fight bad guys within the country while
simultaneously trying to be nice to the ordinary people caught in the
crossfire. As my father, a veteran of two wars, always said, you can no more
"sort of" fight a war than you can be "sort of" pregnant.
If you don’t fight to win, you’re losing.
The
Iraq War turned around only with the Surge when Bush decided to fight to win,
rather than wallow in a Vietnam-esque quagmire in the face of guerilla (and
Iranian) warfare. The gains from those bloody battles might have lasted if
America had kept her troops there for a decade or two, not to fight but to
maintain the peace. Instead, Obama, the “anti-war president,” pulled American
troops out of Iraq rather than acknowledge victory, creating a giant gaping
hole that ISIS and Iran quickly filled.
BLOG
EDIOR: YOU SAW WAR PROFITEER SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN AT OBOMB'S FIRST INAUGURAL
GIVING PART OF THE ADDRESS. THE OLD WHORE'S PIMP-HUSBAND, RICHARD BLUM HAS
PASSED AROUND BIG BRIBES SO DEM POLS WOULD KEEP THEIR MOUTHS SHUT ABOUT
FEINSTEIN'S STAGGERING CORRUPTION. SHE HAS AMASSED MULTIPLE FORTUNES OFF
ELECTED OFFICE AND HAS VOTED AGAINST ANY AND ALL ATTEMPTS TO FIX THE SQUALID
ETHICS OF THE BRIBES SUCKING U.S. SENATE.
Of
course, Obama was a pretty deadly guy for an anti-war president. He personally
targeted the victims of drone strikes in the hinterlands between Pakistan and
Afghanistan. He decided to engage in regime-change in Libya, even though the
execrable Qaddafi had already laid down his arms against America. Having
toppled Qaddafi, Obama left, turning the country into a terrorist haven. And of
course, Obama meddled in Syria, creating a refugee crisis that permanently
changed Europe for the worse.
And
what about the Democrats as a whole? From 2002 to January 2009, they were the
anti-War party, taking to the streets on a regular basis to call President Bush
"Hitler incarnate." (Where have we heard that before?) They turned
the pathetic Cindy Sheehan, who had broken down mentally after her son died
fighting in Iraq, into a saint, only to dump her when she ceased to be useful.
In
January 2009, when Obama entered the White House, the anti-war movement
stopped. Suddenly, American aggression was fine, contingent upon one thing:
Samantha Power’s “Responsibility to Protect” theory meant that America could
engage in war provided that the war did not confer any direct benefit on her.
America’s troops would henceforth die as martyrs to the causes of other
nations.
Eventually,
America’s working and middle classes, the people whose sons and daughters were
filling up the ranks of martyrdom, were done. They rejected self-styled elites
using their children as vehicles for the elites’ own sense that, by sacrificing
the little people, they were doing a form of penance for America’s sordid
history of capitalism and liberty.
That’s
one of the reasons we got Trump, who didn’t like seeing Americans die
pointlessly. He made it clear to our enemies that, like Teddy Roosevelt, he
would speak softly and carrying a "yuuge" stick. It worked. Despite
the leftists’ certainty that Trump was Hitler, he was the first president in
decades not to embroil America in new wars. Naturally, the Pentagon crowd
hates Trump. A peacetime military doesn’t provide scope for promotion, nor is
the money following the military businesses that give well-paying jobs to
retired Pentagon types.
Leftists
have now become the party of war. They are incredibly pleased that Biden will
bring the military-industrial complex and pointless wars back to the forefront
of American politics. Paul Joseph Watson, with his usual acumen, points out
what Obama did to the world and what Biden promises to do. It’s ugly. (As
usual, these Watson videos come with a language warning.)
Image: Refugees
heading to Europe. YouTube screengrab.
Ten years since
WikiLeaks published the
US diplomatic cables
Today is the tenth anniversary of “Cablegate” when WikiLeaks,
leading a group of partner media organisations, began reporting on the contents
of hundreds of thousands of leaked United States government diplomatic cables.
The documents revealed the vast scope and global reach of US
imperialism’s criminal conspiracies against the international working class,
and the brutality and corruption of capitalist governments the world over.
Julian Assange (Credit: Newsonline, Flickr)
Of historic significance in their own right, the publications
followed WikiLeaks’s extraordinary releases earlier that year of the
“Collateral Murder” video—showing the killing of Iraqi civilians, including
journalists and first responders, by US soldiers—the Afghan War Logs and the
Iraq War Logs.
These publications earned WikiLeaks, and in
particular its founder, the journalist and publisher Julian Assange, the
undying enmity of the ruling class. A vicious campaign of slander and pseudo-legal persecution
was launched against Assange that continues to this day. He is currently locked
up in London’s Belmarsh maximum security prison awaiting a verdict on his
extradition to the US, where he faces a likely sentence of 175 years in the
darkest corner of the American prison system, on charges under the Espionage
Act.
Just a small sample of the diplomatic cables exposures gives
a sense of their significance.
They revealed that the US had knowledge of and approved the
military coup that toppled Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra in 2006.
American officials discussed the possibility of a similar overthrow of the
Pakistani government in 2009 with the country’s top general. In 2009,
Washington privately supported the military coup against Honduran President
Manuel Zelaya and worked to cover up the repression which followed.
US intelligence assets helped to engineer Kevin Rudd’s
replacement as Australian prime minister by Julia Gillard in 2010, to ensure a
continued Australian presence in the criminal US-led occupation of Afghanistan.
Rudd was also targeted for suggesting America make minor accommodations to
China’s growing influence in the Asia-Pacific region.
The cables demonstrated that the US government was fully
aware of the torture, random arrests, and extra-judicial killings carried out
by its ally Hosni Mubarak in Egypt. They proved Washington’s detailed knowledge
of state corruption in Tunisia and exposed the government’s collaboration in
abrogating the rights of Tunisian citizens detained in Guantanamo Bay.
Governments in Pakistan and Yemen were shown to have collaborated with US drone
operations in their own countries, responsible for the repeated massacres of
civilians.
American officials were aware of an explosion at a BP gas rig
in the Caspian Sea in 2008 but took no action to investigate the safety of the
company’s other sites. Two years later, an explosion at a rig in the Gulf of
Mexico killed eleven people and created the largest marine oil spill in
history. During the 2009 Copenhagen climate conference, the US successfully
bribed and blackmailed poor countries over development aid to gain support for
a watering down of climate commitments.
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ordered
US embassies and UN representatives to gather personal information, including
credit card and frequent flyer account numbers, internet passwords, work
schedules and even DNA samples, from UN and foreign government officials. The
only realistic purpose being to facilitate similar blackmail operations.
Yet more cables detailed the domination of the Nigerian state
by Shell Oil.
Contrary to the claims of the US government that WikiLeaks
recklessly endangered vulnerable sources named in the cables, a painstaking and
collaborative process was established to review and redact the documents before
publication. At Assange’s extradition hearing this September, journalists from
all over the world testified to WikiLeaks’ “pioneering” use of encryption to
protect sources and documents. The cables were scheduled to be released over
the course of a year, on a country-by-country basis, making use of the
expertise of local partner media organisations to ensure the appropriate
redactions took place. In some cases, the US government itself provided suggestions
for redactions.
Evidence heard at the hearing also established that it
was Guardian journalist David Leigh who was responsible for allowing
the release of tens of thousands of unredacted cables, which had been securely
stored by WikiLeaks, in September 2011. In a hatchet-job on WikiLeaks, WikiLeaks: Inside Julian
Assange's War on Secrecy, Leigh published the password to a secure online archive containing the
cables, making them freely accessible.
Assange called the US State Department to warn them of an
impending release but was ignored. He and the other WikiLeaks editors then took
the decision to publish the unredacted cables themselves, since the documents
were already in the public domain. WikiLeaks’s main media partners, the Guardian,
the New York Times, Der Spiegel, El Pais, and Le Monde,
used this event as a pretext to break off relations with the organisation and
denounce its work.
The American government responded to the initial “Cablegate”
publications with an embargo on WikiLeaks. Amazon removed the site from its web
servers, PayPal cut off the WikiLeaks account and Mastercard and Visa prevented
payments being made to the organisation. Bank of America stopped handling
WikiLeaks payments and Swiss bank PostFinance froze Assange’s assets.
WikiLeaks also came under a massive “distributed
denial-of-service” (DDoS) attack, effectively preventing users from accessing
its site.
Obama’s Democratic Party administration
launched a furious salvo of denunciations, with then Vice President Joe Biden
calling Assange a “high-tech terrorist” and Hilary Clinton reportedly asking,
“Can’t we just drone this guy?” This opened the floodgates to a torrent of demands
from Republicans and the right-wing media for his assassination.
Assange was subjected to a sprawling conspiracy, as Sweden
launched a manufactured sexual assault investigation to secure his arrest.
Swedish prosecutors were encouraged by the UK authorities who used a Swedish
extradition request to arbitrarily detain Assange in the Ecuadorian Assembly in
London, where he had claimed political asylum. Pseudo-left political
organisations abandoned Assange entirely over this smear campaign, or openly attacked
him as a “rapist”, despite no charges ever being laid.
In April 2019, the US, UK and a new Ecuadorian government led
by Lenin Moreno reached a deal to see Assange illegally seized from the embassy
by British police.
Wall Street, Republicans and militarists back Biden campaign
Anyone who wants to know what type of policies will
be pursued by a Biden administration in the event the
Democrats win the November 3 presidential election
has only to look at the social and political forces that
are rallying to his campaign.
BLOG EDITOR: BIDEN WAS ENDORSED VERY EARLY BY WAR PROFITEER
AND PARTNER FOR RED CHINA SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN.
They include Wall Street, prominent Republicans and
veterans of the Obama national security team.
Thanks to strong support from big business, the
presidential campaign of the former vice president outraised President Trump’s
reelection campaign in June, according to figures announced by the two
campaigns last week. Joe Biden raked in $141 million, while Trump’s campaign
took in $131 million.
It was the second consecutive month that Biden collected
more in campaign contributions than Trump, following a $6 million edge in May,
$80.8 million to $74 million, according to reports filed with the Federal
Election Commission.
The Trump campaign still leads in cash in the bank, with
$295 million on hand as of July 1, as it had few expenses during the Republican
primaries, where Trump had only token opposition. Biden’s campaign was
effectively broke at the time of his breakthrough victories in the Super
Tuesday primaries on March 3, but he now has amassed a war chest of at least
$125 million, according to published estimates.
ActBlue, the online fundraising vehicle for the Democratic
Party as a whole, took in $392 million in June, shattering all previous
records, the bulk of it in smaller donations and contributions from first-time
donors. This is an indication of the widespread popular hostility to Trump, exacerbated
by his vitriolic attacks on the mass protests against police violence that took
place throughout the month, as well as his refusal to take any serious action
to stem the coronavirus pandemic.
BLOG EDITOR: THE RICH KNOW WHO WILL SERVE THEM BEST! ALL
BILLIONAIRES ARE DEMOCRATS. THE GREATEST TRANSFER OF WEALTH TO THE
RICH IN AMERICAN HISTORY OCCURRED DURING THE BANKSTER REGIME OF
OBAMA-BIDEN-HOLDER.
But a major factor in Biden’s fundraising surge has been a
series of virtual events featuring former President Obama, Senator Elizabeth
Warren and Senator Kamala Harris, at which wealthy contributors were invited to
give the maximum donation of $5,600 directly to Biden as well as much larger
sums to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the political action
committee favored by the Biden campaign, Priorities USA, which expects to spend
$200 million by itself to support his election.
Under the terms of an agreement between the Biden campaign
and the DNC, the Biden Victory Fund can receive checks as large as $620,600
from wealthy donors. The money is then distributed in smaller amounts to the
campaign, the DNC and various state parties in order to comply with campaign
finance regulations.
According to figures released this week by the Center for
Responsive Politics, Wall Street in particular is favoring Biden’s campaign
over Trump’s. The group found that Biden has raised $52.4 million from the
finance, insurance and real estate industries, of which $32.2 million came from
“securities and investment.”
Trump raised $33.5 million from the broader category of
finance, insurance and real estate. He was competitive with Biden among the
real estate moguls, who view Trump as one of their own, but trailed badly, with
only $7.8 million, from the “securities and investment” subcategory.
In other words, Wall
Street favored Biden by better than four to one, and Biden’s $23
million lead among the financial elite accounted for more than his entire $16
million edge over Trump in fundraising in May and June.
Along with the support of the stock exchange and financial
institutions, Biden is winning support from sections of the Republican Party.
This includes the well publicized Lincoln Project, established by former
Republican campaign operatives Reed Galen, John Weaver, Rick Wilson and Steve
Schmidt, with the support of other former party officials like Jennifer Horn,
former chair of the New Hampshire Republican Party, and George Conway, a
prominent Republican lawyer and husband of Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway.
The Lincoln Project began running
television and internet commercials denouncing Trump from a right-wing foreign
policy standpoint, criticizing him as soft on China and Russia. One ad,
released after the New York Times launched its fabricated
and unsubstantiated charge that Russia paid bounties to Taliban fighters to
kill American soldiers in Afghanistan, features a former Navy SEAL who attacks
Trump for not ordering military action to kill Russians. The ad is titled
“Betrayal.”
BLOG EDITOR: BOTH BIDEN AND GEORGE W BUSH ARE GLOBALIST FOR
OPEN BORDERS AND ENDLESS WAR. THE BUSH FAMILY, LONG PARTNERED WITH THE 9-11
INVADING SAUDIS, STARTED TWO WARS AGAINST IRAQ WHICH ARE STILL FILLING THEIR
POCKETS.
Another political action committee, “43 Alumni for Biden,”
consists of hundreds of former officials in the Republican administration of
George W. Bush (the 43rd US president). They declare they are “choosing country
over party” in the November election, stating: “We believe that a Biden
administration will adhere to the rule of law ... and restore dignity and
integrity to the White House.” As a Super PAC, the group can raise unlimited
sums of money to run ads attacking Trump or boosting Biden.
The final component in the rapidly coalescing coalition of
reactionaries supporting the Biden campaign consists of former
military-intelligence officials of the Obama administration, who have made a
killing in the lucrative business of “strategic consulting” and now hope to
return to power in a Biden administration. Several of them, including former
deputy defense secretary Michele Flournoy and former deputy national security
adviser and deputy secretary of state Anthony Blinken, have signed on as
Biden’s top national security advisers.
A remarkable article
in The American Prospect—a liberal publication that supports
Biden against Trump—makes a devastating exposure of these militarists for
Biden, under the headline, “How Biden’s Foreign Policy Team Got Rich.”
It documents the creation of a strategic consulting firm
called WestExec Advisors (named after West Executive Avenue, the street outside
the West Wing of the White House in Washington D.C.). WestExec was founded by
two lesser operatives, Sergio Aguirre, former chief of staff to Samantha Power,
UN ambassador under Obama, and Nitin Chadda, a former aide to Obama Secretary
of Defense Ashton Carter.
These two recruited Flournoy and Blinken to serve as the
group’s biggest “names.” Flournoy was widely expected to become secretary of
defense if Hillary Clinton won the 2016 election and she is once again at the
top of the list for Pentagon boss under Biden.
Under Trump, Flournoy served on the
Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board, the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board
and the CIA director’s External Advisory Board, before leaving once the 2020
presidential campaign heated up. She is a notorious warmonger, and The
American Prospect article details her role in
advocating continued US military support to Saudi Arabia in its war in Yemen,
which has resulted in $3 billion in weapons contracts for Raytheon. WestExec
principal Robert Work, a former deputy defense secretary, is a member of
Raytheon’s board of directors.
WestExec quickly made a splash in Washington with its
launch party attended by top former Obama national security aides such as Susan
Rice, Tom Donilon and Denis McDonough. It lined up a list of clients so potent
that neither WestExec nor the Biden campaign would release the names, for fear
of exposing the fact that Biden’s foreign policy advisory group is a wholly
owned subsidiary of the big military contractors.
One particularly noxious principal at
WestExec is former Deputy CIA Director Avril Haines, who, as The
American Prospect put it, “helped design Obama’s program of using
drones for extrajudicial killings.” In June, the Biden campaign announced that
Haines would oversee foreign policy for the Biden transition team.
While the former drone missile chief
prepares plans for the future Biden administration, the current advisers, with
their lucrative “consulting” affiliations, are listed by The American
Prospect as follows: “Nicholas Burns (The Cohen Group), Kurt Campbell
(The Asia Group), Tom Donilon (BlackRock Investment Institute), Wendy Sherman
(Albright Stonebridge Group), Julianne Smith (WestExec Advisors) and Jake
Sullivan (Macro Advisory Partners). They rarely discuss their connections to
corporate power, defense contractors, private equity, and hedge funds, let
alone disclose them.”
This is what Senator Bernie Sanders, Senator Elizabeth
Warren and their various liberal and pseudo-left apologists have embraced as
the alternative to the fascistic Trump administration—a government of
warmongers and corporate shills, no less committed to the defense of the
interests of the American ruling elite.
https://twitter.com/philosophrob/status/1099103180552654848
1. Wells Fargo (Banking)
2. Northrop Grumman (Defense)
3. Bank of America (Banking)
4. General Atomics (Defense)
5. General Dynamics
(Defense)
SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN RANKS
AS ONE OF THE MOST CORRUPT AND SELF-SERVING POLITICIANS IN AMERICAN HISTORY.
SHE HAS AMASSE A STAGGERING
FORTUNE AS SHE STALKED THE HALLS OF CONGRESS SNIFFING OUT DEALS THAT SHE AND
BARBARA “BRIBES” BOXER VOTED ON THAT DROPPED HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS INTO THE
POCKETS OF FEINSTEIN’S PIMP-HUSBAND RICHARD BLUM
BLUM HAS HANDED OUT CAMPAIGN
“CONTRIBUTIONS” BRIBES TO VIRTUALLY ALL MAJOR DEM POLS SO THEY KEEP THEIR
MOUTHS CLOSED ABOUT FEINSTEIN’S STAGGERING CORRUPTION.
FEINSTEIN HAS VOTED AGAINST
ALL SENATE ATTEMPTS TO CURB SIPHONING OFF BRIBES TO FAMILY MEMBERS IN THE FORM
OF “CONSULTANT” FEES.
BARBARA “BRIBES” BOXER MADE
A VAST FORTUNE SHE SIPHONED OVER TO HER SON, OAKLAN LAWYER DOUG BOXER.
PELOSI HAS SIPHONED OFF
BRIBES TO HER HUSBAND. AND THEN THERE ARE THE BACK ROOM DEALS BLUM MADE TO
PROFIT ON FEINSTEIN’S RED CHINA CONNECTIONS.
JUST FOLLOW THE MONEY AS
THESE TRAITORS DESTROY OUR COUNTRY AND FILL THEIR POCKETS DOING IT!
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2019/07/she-ranks-as-one-of-most-corrupt-and.html
*
IN THE November 2006 election, the voters demanded congressional
ethics reform. And so, the newly appointed chairman of the Senate Rules
Committee, Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., is now duly in charge of regulating the
ethical behavior of her colleagues. But for many years, Feinstein has been
beset by her own ethical conflict of interest, say congressional ethics
experts.
“All
in all, it was an incredible victory for the Chinese government. Feinstein has
done more for Red China than other any serving U.S. politician. “ Trevor Loudon
“Our entire crony capitalist system, Democrat and
Republican alike, has become a kleptocracy approaching par with
third-world hell-holes. This is the way a great country is raided by
its elite.” ---- Karen McQuillan AMERICAN THINKER.com
A SEARCH FOR FEINSTEIN AND WAR PROFITEER
Search Results
Web
results
Dianne
Feinstein: War profiteer and war criminal | Freepress.org
Jul 5, 2013 - Dianne Feinstein: War profiteer and war criminal ... Senator Feinstein has been quick to be at the forefront of defending these
programs and ...
Senator
Feinstein's War Profiteering - Antiwar.com Original
No comments:
Post a Comment