Is California Over?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teBgznnPpXM
S.F. THE HOME OF THE PANTHEON OF CORRUPTION: KAMALA HARRIS, NANCY PELOSI, WAR PROFITEER DIANNE FEINSTEIN AND GAVIN NEWSOM
Why San Francisco is Leading California | Tony Hall
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqSke8Z1YyM
THIS IS FOR REAL!
GOV CANDIDATE FOR MEXIFORNIA GOES ALL OUT HISPANDERING FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES AND GETS WARM AND FUZZY WITH MS-13 MURDERING THUG ANIMALS!
ONLY A DEM CAN WALLOW WITH THE LOWEST INVADING VERMIN TO GET THEIR ILLEGAL VOTES!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/05/la-raza-supremacist-gavin-newsom.html
“They kidnap. They extort. They rape and they rob,” Trump said then. “They stomp on their victims. They beat them with clubs, they slash them with machetes, and they stab them with knives. They have transformed peaceful parks and beautiful quiet neighborhoods into bloodstained killing fields. They’re animals.
“And if he takes a pass, the two Democrats most likely to succeed Brown – Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom and former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa – favor excessive social spending and are actively courting illegal immigrant support.”
HOW “CHEAP” IS ALL THAT INVADING “CHEAP” LABOR?
Natalio Vitervo-Vasquez was deported twice but returned to provide “cheap” labor. He can’t read or write and raped his 10-year-old daughter.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/08/illegal-natalio-vitervo-vasquez-goes-to.html
“Prosecutors say the girl, who was 11-years-old at the time, went to a medical center where it was determined she was pregnant. Officials say she would have conceived the child at ten years of age.”
THE LA RAZA MEX CRIME TIDAL WAVE SWEEPS MEXIFORNIA: RAPE, MURDER and CHILD MOLESTATION
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/06/mexifornia-75-gang-leaders-arrested-in.html
Kamala Harris Meets with ‘DREAMer’ Illegal Immigrants: ‘This Is Your Home’
Vice President Kamala Harris met with a group of illegal immigrants brought to the United States as children at the White House on Thursday, promising to fight for amnesty for them.
“I want to make clear to the DREAMers that are here, and to those who are watching from home,” she said, signaling emotion. “This is your home, this is your home, and we see you and you are not alone.”
US Vice President Kamala Harris speaks during a discussion with Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) stakeholders (MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images)
Harris noted that many illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. as children were people who worked jobs in Fortune 500 companies, the health care industry, served in the military, and even were going to college.
“Many have been living recently, these years, a life of uncertainty even though this is the only country they have ever known,” she said. “They deserve a pathway to citizenship.”
Harris brought up the ruling by a federal judge last week that the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, first enacted by former President Barack Obama, was unconstitutional.
The ruling shuts down any new applicants to the program, despite President Joe Biden’s support for the program.
The vice president registered her disappointment with the ruling.
“The president and I, needless to say … we are unequivocal that we recognize you for the Americans that you are and that we recognize that you deserve all the rights that come with American citizenship,” Harris said to the group of activists.
Harris reminded current DACA recipients that they were currently safe despite the ruling, but that the Justice Department would appeal the decision.
She said the Department of Homeland Security would also create new enforcement rules to handle DACA illegals.
Harris expressed her frustration with the multiple legal challenges to the DACA program.
“The status quo of young immigrants living with uncertainty between one case to another is just simply wrong,” she said, adding that the illegal immigrants were living in fear of every “knock at the door.”
She again called for amnesty for illegal immigrants, promising to push Congress to make progress on the issue.
“We will not give up in this fight,” she said.
Harris also made a moral argument about giving illegal immigrants amnesty, noting that Americans should reward their “self-determination.”
“This is about saying that we want to ensure that all people have the ability to determine their own future,” she said.
Kamala Harris to campaign for Gavin Newsom facing recall --what could go wrong?
So Kamala Harris is set to campaign for embattled California Gov. Gavin Newsom, to keep him from losing office. The latter, of course, is facing a voter recall.
According to the Washington Examiner:
Vice President Kamala Harris vowed to campaign for Gov. Gavin Newsom as he faces a recall effort in California.When asked whether she would back the Democratic governor, the longtime associate of Newsom answered, "Yes."
Harris, a former California attorney general and senator, did not elaborate further as she departed the Capitol.
Harris previously voiced support for Newsom, saying she backed him "100%" in a video message before officials announced the recall effort attracted enough verified signatures to proceed in late June.
The pair go way back, to the glittering old-money society parties of Pacific Heights back in their salad days.
Newsom campaigned for Harris as she was running for president in her failed presidential election campaign in 2019. Now Harris is returning the favor.
Three things, though, stand out that suggest this might not work out the way they think it will.
One, Harris is miserably unpopular in her own right with voters, with polls showing that her ratings are underwater. Just yesterday the New York Post ran this headline:
Kamala Harris under water in latest polling amid surging border crisis and veep office gripes
A normal pol in trouble gets a more popular pol to do some endorsing for him. Not Newsom. He chooses the least-liked politician in America, one who won't do her job, either on the border or on voting rights, to vouch for him to voters.
Sound like that will work?
Actually, sounds like he's desperate.
Two, the pair of them campaigning together can only serve to remind voters of all the cronyism in California politics.
They shared ties with Willie Brown who "made" both of them, handing each a big-dollar little-work commission appointment as his political children.
They also shared ties to Gordon Getty, who was Newsom's moneybags patron, and in time, became Harris's, too. Newsom, in fact, is a major influence who introduced Harris to all the San Francisco moneybag donors. The two of them even shared a political consultant/campaign manager.
They also seem to have shared some trouble with Newsom's ex, Kimberly Guilfoyle: Guilfoyle, before she dumped Newsom, complained that Harris was mean to her. With Newsom becoming Guilfoyle's bitter ex, it seems that Newsom and Harris could have an additional reason to bond.
Newsom has always been a godsend to Harris, what with his connections to the Gettys, the House of Pelosi, and the House of Brown (not Willie, but Pat and Jerry Brown). Here's a chart of all the inbred royalty around him, from CalMatters.
Here's a Vanity Fair story showing how Newsom roused the moneybags to troubled Harris in 2019.
Meanwhile, according to Politico, here are Harris's Brown ties:
It’s hard to think honestly about the origins of the rise of Harris without grappling with the reality of the role of Brown. He helped her. He put her on a pair of state boards that required not much work and paid her more than $400,000 across five years on top of her salary as a prosecutor. He gave her a BMW. He helped her, too, though, in a way that was less immediately material but arguably far more enduringly important.
“Brown, of course, was the darling of the well-to-do set, if you will,” veteran political consultant Jack Davis, who managed Brown’s mayoral campaign, told me. “And she was the girlfriend, and so she met, you know, everybody who’s anybody, as a result of being his girl.”
“I met her through Willie,” John Burton, the former San Francisco congressman and chairman of the California Democratic Party, said in an interview. “I would think it’s fair to say that most of the people in San Francisco met her through Willie.”
Harris, in turn, "served" as Willie Brown's mistress.
There also was this with Politico, with the glittery parties Newsom and Harris would go to:
“Few women,” gushed the Gazette, “are more involved than (equally glamorous) attorney Kamala Harris.” In the outlet distributed specifically to the neighborhoods of the rich, she was featured in a fashion spread, shown wearing $565 boots, a $975 skirt and a $1,095 coat, all made by Burberry. In the descriptions of P.J. Corkery of the Examiner—who also ghost-wrote Brown’s book—Harris was “super-chic” and “super-smart” and “drop-dead elegant” and “very visible.” She was seen at Harry Denton’s Starlight Room. She was seen at Jeannette Etheredge’s Tosca. She went to a ball to benefit local arts museums at which celebrity event planner Stanlee Gatti’s elaborate set-up incorporated centerpieces of large balls of ice—and was spotted “sometime around midnight” trying to bowl the frosty orbs with Gavin Newsom, who was then a city supervisor as well as a friend and business partner of the Gettys. She went to the 25th anniversary showing of San Francisco’s “Beach Blanket Babylon” and was spotted slipping out of the afterparty for a dinner at Jardinière with Willie Brown and high society grande dame Denise Hale. She went to a Ricky Martin concert in a limo with Hale and Denton and scenester Harry de Wildt. She went to the parties of haute couture clothier Wilkes Bashford. She went to ladies’ luncheons at Pacific Heights homes. She had Sunday dinners with the Gettys.
...and this, with Newsom's moneybags ties:
Because three years after the Getty wedding, in mid-2002, Harris called Mark Buell. She knew him because Harris was friends with his stepdaughter, Summer Tompkins Walker, the daughter of Susie Tompkins Buell, the major Democratic donor. Harris told him she wanted to run for district attorney. At first, Buell was skeptical, he said recently when we got together for dinner at an old Union Square haunt called Sam’s; he considered Harris “a socialite with a law degree,” he explained over salmon and sauvignon blanc. The more Harris talked, though, the more impressed he became. By the end of their conversation, Buell offered to be her finance chair. His first piece of advice: To knock off an incumbent in what would be a nasty, three-candidate fight, Harris was going to need to raise an early, eye-popping amount of money. Buell saw her friends, people he knew, too, as an asset to deploy. “So we put together a finance committee that primarily was young socialite ladies,” he told me. The group included Vanessa Getty, by then one of Harris’ closest pals, and Susan Swig—head-turning surnames in the city’s choicest circles. Buell’s directive: “I said, ‘No one has ever raised more than $150,000 for a D.A.’s race, totally. I want this group to raise $100,000 by the first reporting period.”
Outfitted in sharp designer suits and strands of bright pearls, Harris kickstarted her drive to become San Francisco’s top cop—in its ritziest, most prestigious locale. Predominantly white Pacific Heights—hills upon hills, gobsmacking views of the Golden Gate strait, mansions built and bought with both new tech money and old gold rush cash—is home to Nancy Pelosi, Dianne Feinstein, Gavin Newsom and others, one of the country’s foremost concentrations of politicians and their patrons.
The two were so close, in fact, that the Desert Sun reported this:
Newsom and Harris have shared campaign managers for many years and have long had an informal understanding never to oppose each other’s ambitions.
So in other words, they had a pact to preserve the political monopoly.
Which doesn't sound too promising for Newsom as word of their political elite "friendship" gets out. Harris there right beside Newsom is bound to lead to some clucking about both of their rises to the top.
A recall election, after all, is a rebellion, against the political establishment, so Harris's ties to Newsom -- set against the background of her being promoted above her level of competence to vice president, based on political connections, pretty well reminds votes of Newsom, too, and what they don't like about California politics.
There was a single report of that fraying in the Desert Sun:
Until Harris’ Latin American trip, Newsom had never uttered a critical word about the vice president, who — like Newsom — got her start in San Francisco politics, winning two terms as district attorney before becoming California’s attorney general and then a senator.
But Harris no sooner returned to Washington, D.C.. from her trip than Newsom checked in on the side of left-wing Democrats like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who earlier blasted Harris for her anti-immigration remarks. In a press conference just after Harris’ return, Newsom observed that “California has long had a different approach to immigration, a more inclusive approach.” He added that he has consulted with other federal officials about “how California can be more supportive in terms of the needs of asylum seekers.”
But set against the rest of the huge history the pair of them have, which includes money, it sounds like window dressing to me.
The third factor as to why this won't work is Harris's tendency toward political gaffes. She's got a tin ear politically, and actually, so does Newsom, the man of French Laundry COVID dining who advised California residents to put on their masks between bites of dinner. Everyone knows he's going to make some gaffes and weird videos, but does anyone imagine she won't make even more gaffes, too, as she hits the campaign trail for Newsom? Campaigning together, they'll be the Tweedledum and Tweedledee of California politics.
The pair were raised politically as hothouse flowers in a one-party state, cultivated and nurtured by billionaires. Neither of them ever learned to politick the way others learn to politic, which involves give and take, they both just waited their turn until they could be put into place by the big guys out there. Now Harris, with all her low political capital, capital so low that even the Joe Biden camp is apparently leaking bad stories about her to the press, is coming to "help" Newsom by campaigning for him...
What could go wrong?
Image: Elex Michaelson, video screen shot, via YouTube
Even more damaging for Newsom is the fact that, while a lot of voters aren’t enthused about kicking him out early, a large majority (58%) wouldn’t vote for him when he runs for reelection in 2022. Moreover, a plurality of voters gave Newsom a grade of “poor” on key issues: COVID, droughts, wildfires, and the homeless
Larry Elder explodes into the lead in California
I’ve made no secret of my support for Larry Elder. If I were still in California, I’d vote for him in a heartbeat. He’s intelligent and deeply principled, and California is in very bad shape. The good news is that I’m not the only one who likes Larry. It turns out that a lot of Californians are relieved that Bruce “Caitlyn” Jenner isn’t the only alternative to Gavin Newsom.
According to an Emerson College/Nexstar Media poll, there’s bad news for Newsom and good news for Elder. With the election coming up in September, currently, 43% of voters want to recall Newsom, while 48% want to keep him in office. If Newsom continues to re-lockdown the state, those numbers can be expected to get much closer – and the 9% of undecided voters will follow the trend.
Even more damaging for Newsom is the fact that, while a lot of voters aren’t enthused about kicking him out early, a large majority (58%) wouldn’t vote for him when he runs for reelection in 2022. Moreover, a plurality of voters gave Newsom a grade of “poor” on key issues: COVID, droughts, wildfires, and the homeless. If Newsom cherished any ideas of jumping from California to the White House, he’d better put those dreams aside.
And what about Larry Elder? It’s clear that those voters who want to get Newsom out, to the extent they’re thinking ahead, are most excited at the prospect of getting Larry in:
On the question of who they would vote for if Newsom was recalled, a majority (53%) of voters are undecided on a candidate. Within the field of candidates that currently have support, conservative talk radio host Larry Elder leads at 16%, followed by businessman John Cox, at 6%, and former San Diego mayor Kevin Faulconer, at 6%. California State Assemblyman Kevin Kiley, and former Olympian and television personality Caitlyn Jenner are at 4% each. Social media influencer Kevin Paffrath is at 2%, with the remaining 8% of voters opting to vote for someone else.
The big question to ask about Elder at this point is “What can he do if he gets into office?” The current legislature is, as it has been for a long time, a Democrat supermajority, which means that, if all the Democrats vote together, they are veto-proof.
Elder will certainly be able to roll back Newsom’s draconian lockdown policies but, when it comes to other matters. he may find himself mostly cheerleading conservative policies in the state, along with vetoing the occasional bill that isn’t veto-proof for some reason or other. He may also have some sway as a voting member of the Regents of the University of California.
And of course, Elder has the power to affect the humongous bureaucracy in California. Appointments to lead those agencies could result in significant policy changes that benefit California. However, Arnold Schwarzenegger thought he could change the bureaucracy, but it changed him, turning him from a soft Republican into a RINO. This time around, I believe Elder is made of stronger stuff and has firmer principles.
In the meantime, it’s time to think up a campaign slogan. Dwight Eisenhower scored hugely with Irving Berlin’s simple three-world slogan: “I like Ike.” While there’s nothing good to rhyme with Larry, “I like Larry” has a great alliterative quality. I’m going for it!
IMAGE: I like Larry button by Andrea Widburg
WHAT IF NAFTA JOE PUMPED $2 BILLION INTO HOUSING PEOPLE MADE HOMELESS DUE TO THE DEMOCRAT PARTY'S LONG ORCHESTRATED INVASION OF 'CHEAP' LABOR???
EVER HEARD THE WORLD 'HOMELESS' COME OUT OF THIS SOCIOPAT LAWYER'S FAT MOUTH???
Want some perspective on why so many blue sanctuary cities have so many homeless encampments hovering around?
Try the reality that illegal immigrants are routinely given free public housing by the U.S., based on the fact that they are uneducated, unskilled, and largely unemployable. Those are the criteria, and now importing poverty has never been easier. Shockingly, this comes as millions of poor Americans are out in the cold awaiting that housing that the original law was intended to help. MONICA SHOWALTER
Biden wastes $2 billion paying contractors not to build the border wall
With a border surge now setting records, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have admonished illegal border crossers not to enter the U.S. "Do not come, do not come," as Harris said in Guatemala. Joe has said similar things.
Republicans have complained about the warnings not being sincere. Now, a Senate Republican report shows there's proof positive of it.
According to Fox News:
A new report by Republicans on a Senate subcommittee has concluded that the Biden administration is spending a minimum of approximately $2 billion to suspend construction of the wall at the southern border, even amid a continuing migrant crisis.
The report by the minority staff of the Government Operations and Border Management Subcommittee of the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee found that efforts to suspend or terminate wall construction projects at the Defense Department have cost between $1.8 billion to $2 billion and the administration is spending $3 million every day.
"These interim findings show that the Biden administration’s efforts to stop border wall construction constitute significant waste of taxpayer resources," the report says. "As of the drafting of this report the Biden administration has paid border wall contractors at least $2 billion and counting to not build the border wall."
The report, by ranking member Sen. Jim Lankford, is here.
Which is pretty disgusting when you think about it. The cash was appropriated and the contracts doled out. But rather than let these items reach completion, Biden prefers to pay contract workers for doing nothing. And $2 billion is no small amount, except to a Democrat.
It also comes at an atrocious time, with illegal migrants surging the border. They're surging all right, and forcing Border Patrol agents to spend time changing diapers, while the real prize for the cartels - the transmission and distribution of illegal drugs -- has nobody watching them. Wouldn't a wall be rather useful for the Border Patrol which can't stop the human waves otherwise?
That Joe Biden would rather waste money than do anything to secure the border, such as build a wall, pretty well tells us he has no problem wasting taxpayer money in the name of Getting Trump. The double harm of a border surge and flushing money down the toilet tells us all we need to know about his sincerity of his claim to want to get control of the border. He obviously doesn't.
Public disapproval of his handling of the border is very much a reality. That would explain his lip service to border enforcement, even as the border surges. But that he would actively work to obstruct the border, even at high cost to his administration, suggests something more sinister.
Image: Screen shot. Newsreporter, via YouTube video
Another line they cut into: Illegals get free public housing as impoverished Americans wait
Want some perspective on why so many blue sanctuary cities have so many homeless encampments hovering around?
Try the reality that illegal immigrants are routinely given free public housing by the U.S., based on the fact that they are uneducated, unskilled, and largely unemployable. Those are the criteria, and now importing poverty has never been easier. Shockingly, this comes as millions of poor Americans are out in the cold awaiting that housing that the original law was intended to help.
Thus, the tent cities, and by coincidence, the worst of these emerging shantytowns are in blue sanctuary cities loaded with illegal immigrants - Orange County, San Francisco, San Diego, Seattle, New York...Is there a connection? At a minimum, it's worth looking at.
The Trump administration's Department of Housing and Urban Development is finally trying to put a stop to it as 1.5 million illegals prepare to enter the U.S. this year, and one can only wonder why they didn't do it yesterday.
According to a report in the Washington Times:
The plan would scrap Clinton-era regulations that allowed illegal immigrants to sign up for assistance without having to disclose their status.
Under the new Trump rules, not only would the leaseholder using public housing have to be an eligible U.S. person, but the government would verify all applicants through the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database, a federal system that’s used to weed illegal immigrants out of other welfare programs.
Those already getting HUD assistance would have to go through a new verification, though it would be over a period of time and wouldn’t all come at once.
“We’ve got our own people to house and need to take care of our citizens,” an administration official told The Washington Times. “Because of past loopholes in HUD guidance, illegal aliens were able to live in free public housing desperately needed by so many of our own citizens. As illegal aliens attempt to swarm our borders, we’re sending the message that you can’t live off of American welfare on the taxpayers’ dime.”
The Times notes that the rules are confusingly contradictary, and some illegal immigrant families are getting full rides based on just one member being born in the U.S. The pregnant caravaner who calculatingly slipped across the U.S. in San Diego late last year, only to have her baby the next day, now, along with her entire family, gets that free ride on government housing. Plus lots of cheesy news coverage about how heartwarming it all is. That's a lot cheaper than any housing she's going to find back in Tegucigalpa.
Migrants would be almost fools not to take the offering.
The problem of course is that Americans who paid into these programs, and the subset who find themselves in dire circumstances, are in fact being shut out.
The fill-the-pews Catholic archbishops may love to tout the virtues of illegal immigrants and wave signs about getting 'justice" for them, but the hard fact here is that these foreign nationals are stealing from others as they take this housing benefit under legal technicalities. That's not a good thing under anyone's theological law. But hypocrisy is comfortable ground for the entire open borders lobby as they shamelessly celebrate lawbreaking at the border, leaving the impoverished of the U.S. out cold.
The Trump administration is trying to have this outrage fixed by summer. But don't imagine it won't be without the open-borders lawsuits, the media sob stories, the leftist judges, and the scolding clerics.
A Homeless Village Is Growing on Apple’s Silicon Valley Property
According to recent reports, a growing homeless encampment has been
set up on dozens of acres of undeveloped land in the heart of Silicon
Valley owned by tech giant Apple.
VICE News reports that despite Apple committing billions of dollars to fix California’s housing crisis, an encampment of homeless people living in RVs, shacks, and tents has taken over dozens of acres of undeveloped land owned by Apple in the center of Silicon Valley.
Between 30 to 100 homeless people have reportedly set up camp on the property owned by Apple in North San Jose. The area covers about 55 acres according to the local CBS affiliate KPIX. Some current residents of the site say that they feel they can be left alone there, despite the area’s proximity to PayPal’s corporate headquarters and other office buildings.
Before the start of the coronavirus pandemic, around 6,000 homeless people lived in San Jose with fewer than 1,000 beds available to them. It’s common for homeless people living outdoors and in vehicles across the Bay Area to be moved from place to place by security and police, those staying on the Apple property have largely been left alone according to Renee Corona who has lived in an RV on the property for nearly two years.
Corona, who receives disability payments but cannot afford to live in San Francisco where she was raised, stated: “This is an area where you’re secluded from the city. I don’t think a lot of people knew about this.” She added: “I’m grateful that they don’t kick us out. I just want to say thank you. They don’t bother us.”
San Jose City Council member David Cohen, whose district includes the property, told VICE News that his office is trying to schedule a meeting with Apple to discuss the site. “We’re setting up a meeting so that I can begin to talk to them about what we might be able to do to help the people who are living there, and to figure out some plan for offering services,” Cohen said.
Read more at VICE News here.
Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship. Follow him on Twitter @LucasNolan or contact via secure email at the address lucasnolan@protonmail.com
THESE VIDEOS SHOULD CONVINCE ANYONE OF THE DANGERS OF LETTING THE DEMOCRAT PARTY RUN THE COUNTRY.... INTO THE GROUND!
Walking Tour of Downtown Seattle in May 2021
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZAFbj-918A
Searching for Hope: Homeless in Sacramento
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TL5MROuIaGU
Inflation is Surging as Wages are Falling - People are Unprepared
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pu9Ad7Y3SZE
Is Los Angeles the worst run city in America - Homeless Update
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeYZoWWBc4s&t=3s
Homeless Woman Doesn't Drink or Use Drugs. In a Tent for 8 Years.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kNDhSl_IyE
Homeless Woman Has a Masters in Mathematics and Engineering
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nT3VGI0V5Rs
What are you Spending Money On? - Prices Skyrocket
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TWlhnCmvws
The Economy is like a Bad Magic Trick - Full of Smoke and Mirrors
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTUKpeXiB2U&t=37s
MacArthur Park Is a Complete Wreck - Hollywood Homeless Breakdown
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81Yl97OypH0&t=32s
Chaos by the Bay: The Truth About Homelessness in San Francisco
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uw8MACDZ3RI
City of Roses or City of Homeless? Portland's human tragedy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcZvD7lKZto
Meet the Homeless Americans Living in Walmart Parking Lots
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1AWLo_fK1U
Living on the brink: One family’s struggle to survive the pandemic
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y92ubHU_AS8
Feeding a family on a food stamp budget
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXKkakwf6Vk
This is life on $7.50 an hour
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SCB1t28nDU
No comments:
Post a Comment