America Faces No Greater Threat Than Joe Biden and the Democrat Party. Their Assault to Our Borders Is As Great As Their Assault to Free Speech and Free Elections
Tuesday, October 12, 2021
FOUR PIG LAWYERS GAMING THE LAWS AND BORDERS AS THEY FILL THEIR POCKETS DESTROYING AMERICA: THE OBOMB, HILLARY CLINTON, KAMALA HARRIS AND SEC. OF OPEN BORDERS LAWYER MAYORKAS
TWO CORRUPT PIG LAWYER-POLTICIANS
TWO MORE PIG LAWYER-POLITICIANS
Save America Immigration Plan!!!
01) Make E-Verify mandatory 02) End Chain Migration 03) End the Lottery Visa 04) End the H / L-series visa programs 05) Make English the Official Language 06) Abolish Birthright Citizenship 07) Rescind the Immigration Act of 1965 08) Pass a law requiring National Voter ID 09) Halt ALL types of Immigration until such a time as our borders are secured 10) BUILD the WALL 11) Make illegal entry into the country a felony 12) Arrest and prosecute persons responsible for allowing sanctuary status of cities/states 13) Make VISA overstays in the country a felony 14) Begin massive deportations of persons illegally in our country
The Department of Homeland Security plans to terminate all remaining border wall projects in the Border Patrol’s Laredo and Rio Grande Valley Sectors. The projects have been paused since January as the agency pondered a final determination to cancel the projects or allow some to continue. The decision brings finality to all remaining projects in South Texas.
In the Friday announcement, DHS will begin initial preparations to conduct environmental site work and stakeholder outreach on other Congressionally approved border wall projects that the administration cannot cancel unilaterally. The administration promises not to construct any new border barrier systems or execute permanent land acquisition related to these projects.
Gap in a border wall construction project. (Photo: Randy Clark/Breitbart Texas)
According to the statement:
Environmental planning activities will cover projects funded with DHS’s Fiscal Year 2018-2021 barrier system appropriations where construction had not started. These activities include additional biological, cultural, and natural resource surveys for project areas where no data have been previously collected. CBP will also conduct comprehensive and targeted outreach with interested stakeholders, including impacted landowners, tribes, state and local elected officials, and federal agencies.
These activities will not involve any construction of new border barrier or permanent land acquisition.
The Biden administration is calling for Congress to cancel the remaining border wall funding appropriated during the Trump administration and instead fund “smarter border security measures,” such as technology and modernization of land ports of entry. Unless Congress cancels the funding, the administration is obligated to exhaust the appropriated funds towards the border barrier projects already funded.
As reported by Breitbart Texas, nearly $6 million per day was exhausted on the paused border wall projects along the southwest border. The money was spent on materials, idled equipment, and make-safe job site activities. The 60-day pause to reach a final determination on the projects, initiated immediately after President Joe Biden took office, has lingered on for nearly nine months at significant expense to the taxpayer.
The administration, obligated to pursue previously funded border barrier projects, will likely slow-roll the environmental process and stakeholder engagement efforts. This delay will likely add to the cost borne by taxpayer projects the current administration has no intention of completing.
Randy Clark is a 32-year veteran of the United States Border Patrol. Prior to his retirement, he served as the Division Chief for Law Enforcement Operations, directing operations for nine Border Patrol Stations within the Del Rio, Texas, Sector. Follow him on Twitter @RandyClarkBBTX.
Obama’s Data Analyst Warns Democrats: Stop Talking About Immigration
A data analyst who worked for former President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign in 2012 is warning Democrats to stop talking about their immigration plans, including amnesty for illegal aliens and increased legal immigration to the United States.
David Shor, a key analyst with Obama’s reelection campaign, tells the New York Times that Democrats’ immigration agenda — t0 bring as many foreign nationals to the U.S. as possible — is so unpopular with Americans that they must stop talking about the issue altogether in order to win elections.
Hillary Clinton “lost because she raised the salience of immigration, when lots of voters in the Midwest disagreed with us on immigration,” Shor said. This is where popularism poses its most bitter choices: He and those who agree with him argue that Democrats need to try to avoid talking about race and immigration. He often brandishes a table showing that among voters who supported universal health care but opposed amnesty for unauthorized immigrants, 60 percent voted for Obama in 2012 but 41 percent voted for Clinton in 2016. That difference, he noted, was more than enough to cost her the election. [Emphasis added]
…
Shor is right about how the Obama campaign understood the electorate. David Simas, the director of opinion research on Obama’s 2012 campaign, recalled a focus group of non-college, undecided white women on immigration. It was a 90-minute discussion, and the Obama campaign made all its best arguments. Then they went around the table. Just hearing about the issue pushed the women toward Mitt Romney. The same process then played out in reverse with shipping jobs overseas. Even when all of Romney’s best arguments were made, the issue itself pushed the women toward Obama. The lesson the Obama team took from that was simple: Don’t talk about immigration. [Emphasis added]
According to Shor, failed Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton should have stopped short before engaging with former President Trump on the issue of immigration in the 2016 election.
Hillary Clinton shares a moment with Joe Biden during a leadership portrait unveiling ceremony for then-Senate Minority Leader Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) December 8, 2016, on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)
“The implication of popularism is that Clinton shouldn’t have heavily engaged Trump on immigration and race, no matter the provocations,” Klein writes. “Instead, she should have stuck to a higher-polling economic message.”
Shor’s warning comes as President Joe Biden’s administration has forced the issue of immigration into the forefront again by announcing the largest refugee resettlement since the 1970s, a policy at the U.S.-Mexico border that allows border crossers to easily get released into the nation’s interior, and preventing federal agents from quickly arresting and deporting illegal aliens.
At the same time, the Biden administration and Democrats in Congress are looking to slip a massive amnesty for millions of illegal aliens into a filibuster-proof budget reconciliation package. Vice President Kamala Harris is facing pressure from open borders lobbying groups, as well as multinational corporations, to ram an amnesty through the Senate.
Vice President Kamala Harris tours the El Paso Border Patrol Station, on June 25, 2021, in El Paso, Texas. (Patrick T. Fallon/AFP via Getty Images)
Shor’s analysis underscores the need for Republicans to take up Trump’s economic nationalist agenda that focused on cutting immigration to boost U.S. wages, reshoring vital domestic manufacturing, protecting working and middle class communities from job-killing free trade, and taking on corporations that seek to widen profit margins by undercutting American workers.
A separate analysis published by Democrat analysts in the Times last week revealed the extent to which Trump’s economic nationalism had won working and middle class communities that have been gutted by globalization over the last three decades.
This is not the first time Democrats have been warned to stop discussing their plans to flood the U.S. labor market with endless streams of illegal and legal immigration.
In October 2018, consultants with the Center for American Progress told Democrats running in the midterm elections that they needed to stop discussing the issue of immigration because their agenda was unpopular with most voters.
The Times reported:
‘It is very difficult to win on immigration with vulnerable voters in the states Trump carried in 2016,’ the strategy memo said, arguing that ‘even the most draconian of Republican policies,’ such as family separation and threats to deport the Dreamers — undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States as children — failed to sway most of them.’
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.
No comments:
Post a Comment