CAN YOU NAME A SINGLE THING JOE BIDEN OR HIS BOSS. BARACK OBAMA EVER DID FOR BLACK AMERICA??? OPEN BORDERS TO KEEP WAGE DEPRESSED HURTS BLACKS FIRST!
Tucker Carlson Tonight 11/1/21 ON DEMS AND RACE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8VaSsOE8AU
Tucker: Who is spreading hate in America?
Jesse Watters exposes corruption in Washington: Voters are getting 'hosed'
Cori Bush Decries Joe Manchin’s Concerns about $1.75 Trillion Infrastructure Bill as ‘Anti-Black,’ ‘Anti-Immigrant’
Rep. Cori Bush (D-MO) said in a statement Monday that Sen. Joe Manchin’s (D-WV) concerns about the $1.75 trillion Build Back Better Act are “anti-black, anti-child, anti-woman, and anti-immigrant.”
Manchin, one of the key swing votes for Democrats in the Senate, said Monday that he would not consider voting for the Build Back Better Act without knowing about the bill’s impact on inflation and the deficit.
The West Virginia Democrat also decried leftists holding the $1.2 trillion so-called bipartisan infrastructure bill “hostage.”
“This is a recipe for economic crises,” Manchin said.
Bush said she does not trust Manchin’s beliefs in what America needs in the mammoth Build Back Better Act.
“I trust the scientists who have shown us what our future will look like if we fail to meaningfully address the climate crisis. I trust the patients and doctors crying out for comprehensive health coverage for every person in America,” she said.
Bush added, “When I promised St. Louis a historic investment in children, in our seniors, in housing, and in our schools, I said that I would do everything I can to actually deliver change that our community can feel.”
“Joe Manchin’s opposition to the Build Back Better Act is anti-Black, anti-child, anti-woman, and anti-immigrant. When we talk about transformative change, we are talking about a bill that will benefit Black, brown, and Indigenous communities,” the progressive Democrat declared.
“Those same communities are overwhelmingly excluded from the bipartisan infrastructure bill. We cannot leave anyone behind. Senator Manchin must support the Build Back Better Act,” she added.
This is not the first time a progressive Democrat injected race into the infrastructure negotiations.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said in June that the bipartisan infrastructure group crafting the $1.2 trillion bill was all white, thereby contributing to “structural racism.”
She wrote:
That’s why folks can sometimes come across as careless when saying “well isn’t something better than nothing?” For many communities, their not having a seat at the table is a precondition for bipartisan deals to work in the 1st place. & that’s not only seen as normal, but valued. Meanwhile, when representatives of excluded communities object to the exclusion &marginalization required to make many bipartisan deals work, they’re dismissed as “unreasonable.”
Ocasio-Cortez added, “So who/what often benefits from this type of bipartisan dealmaking? Corporations & structural racism.”
Sean Moran is a congressional reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter @SeanMoran3.
Exclusive — Rep. Greg Murphy: $450K for Migrants ‘Is More than What’s Given’ to Military Widows
Rep. Greg Murphy (R-NC) noted on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Sunday with host Joel Pollak that the Biden administration’s proposed $450,000 payout to migrants allegedly harmed by the Trump administration is more than the death benefit compensation provided to Americans whose spouses died in military service.
Murphy remarked,”[The Biden administration] said they want to give $450,000 to each of these individuals [and] $400,000 is what’s given to someone who lost a loved one while in service of this country in the military, [and] $450,000 is more than [compensation paid to] someone who was lost in 9/11.”
He added, “$400,000 is what’s given to someone who lost a loved one while in service of this country in the military. It’s the same or similar amount for a $50,000 is more than someone who was lost in 9/11.”
He continued, “This is a slap in the face of the American people. We are literally paying people to commit crimes against this country. Why the Biden administration is complicit and wants to do this is just simply unconscionable. It just fits in the narrative that they can’t get any crazier or more anti-American than the day before, so they have to try.”
Pollak noted that the Biden administration’s contemplation of rewarding migrants for illegally entering the U.S. will further incentivize illegal immigration and exploitation of children by transnational criminal cartels and those they smuggle across the U.S.-Mexico border.
He said, “Democrats just don’t understand incentives and human behavior. Unless they want this flood to continue. … They don’t get why human beings do what we do, because if you say you’re gonna earn half a million dollars by showing up here illegally, why wouldn’t all of the world come here to get half a million bucks? It’s like winning the lottery.”
“This is just going to make the flood on the border even worse,” he added. “Once word gets around that people who are – unquote-unquote — ‘separated from their children’ or ‘separated from their families’ are going get half a million bucks in compensation, everyone’s going to come here. They would even stage their separation, so they have some kind of claim through the ACLU and other lawyers. … This is a terrible incentive.”
President Joe Biden stands alongside Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas (L) after signing executive orders related to immigration in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, February 2, 2021. (Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)
Murphy replied, “You’re telling [everyone], especially lower-income America, we’re going to pay people to come in our country illegally and pay them depending upon how many family members — more than you’re ever going to earn in a lifetime.”
Breitbart News Sunday broadcasts live on SiriusXM Patriot 125 from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. Eastern.
Survey: Elite-Imposed Migration Is Transforming National Politics
Many Democrats want to see American society transformed by migration and diversity, according to a survey by the left-leaning Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI).
“More than six in ten Democrats (64%), mostly agree that they prefer the U.S. to be made up of people from all over the world” — instead of from American families and communities, said the survey, titled “Competing Visions of America: An Evolving Identity or a Culture Under Attack? Findings from the 2021 American Values Survey.”
The late-September survey asked 2,508 Americans about various aspects of immigration and diversity. The results showed that Democrats are becoming increasingly radical but also that more Republicans are openly opposing their planned demographic replacement — and that Latinos increasingly dislike imposed diversity.
For example, more Republicans are resisting the nation’s open-door policy, according to the poll:
Republicans (28%) are less likely to have positive views of immigrants today than they were in 2018 (34%) and in 2011 (39%), and have grown more likely to believe that immigrants threaten American values (71% today, 65% in 2018, and 55% in 2011).
‘Two-thirds of Republicans (65%) say instead that immigrants are a burden because they take jobs, housing, and health care,” the report said.
But the survey also reported that “more than eight in ten Democrats (82%) say that immigrants strengthen the country because of their hard work and talents.”
PRRI president Robert Jones spotlighted the huge shift in American politics since the 1950s-era.
Back then, domestic politics were dominated by left vs. rights arguments over how to distribute the huge profits generated by the nation’s huge manufacturing economy.
Those class-and-wages politics continue, but they get little attention from the establishment media since the bipartisan establishment doubled immigration in 1990. That doubling helped to stagnate wages, supercharge the stock market, and also shifted media coverage onto the “diversity” disputes that are used to break up the social norms developed by Americans to help share civic and economic wealth.
“Increasingly, this what American elections have been about — less about particular policies and more about who we are …, [and] ‘Are we kind of an evolving identity or are we a culture that’s been under attack?'” Jones said in a press briefing on November 1:
What we’re struggling over, I think in the bigger debates in the country, is “What is America about? Was there a golden age right for America?” and we’re seeing this very different vision among Democrats and Republicans.
Democrats have moved left on immigration and diversity since 2012, largely because they followed their Democratic leaders, who have increasingly championed the claim that the United States is a diversifying “Nation of Immigrants,” not of Americans. This stance has also prompted Democrats to revive racial demands so they can argue that Americans’ culture must be transformed by migrants and diversity.
For example, the Democrats’ candidate for governor in Virginia called on November 1 for a dramatic reduction in the percentage of teachers who are white: “Fifty percent are students of color and yet 80 percent of teachers are white: We all know what we have to do …. to make everybody feel comfortable,” he threatened.
Democrats are signaling they are more comfortable with the demographic and cultural changes caused since immigration numbers were doubled in the 1990 bipartisan deal between President George H. Bush and Democratic Sen. Ted Kennedy. The survey said:
[Only] three in ten Democrats (31%) agree with the idea that things have changed so much that they often feel like strangers in their own country, compared to 39% of independents and 56% of Republicans.
There is nearly a 50-percentage-point gap between Republicans (80%) and Democrats (33%) on this question. Independents mirror all Americans closely (50% agree vs. 49% disagree).
One reason for the Democrats’ comfort amid diversity is that their coalition is increasingly based on the groups that oppose Americans and their pro-solidarity norms. Those groups include religious minorities, status-seeking college progressives, immigrant cultural minorities, comfortable suburbanites, investors, and corporate employers.
“Democrats are four times more likely to say the decline of the white population in the 2020 Census is mostly positive vs. negative (39% vs. 9%),” the survey noted.
In contrast, Republicans “are more than five times less likely to say this change is positive vs. negative (6% vs. 33%),” the report said.
The poll showed that college-educated Americans are especially eager to welcome lower-status and often compliant migrants: “White Americans with college degrees are more likely than those without college degrees to hold positive opinions of newcomers (69% vs. 43%).”
That Democrats’ pro-diversity policy may shift back towards the center if more college-graduate voters object to government-fueled hiring discrimination, or if Latino voters continue their shift towards the populist wing of the GOP.
But the survey shows that Latino voters are increasingly skeptical about additional immigration, in part, because their wages are cut and their housing costs are increased: “Hispanic Americans are less likely to believe that newcomers strengthen American society today (62%) than they were in 2018 (72%) but remain similar to 2011 levels (64%).”
The PRRI poll argues that national public support for amnesty remains level as the two parties are moving further apart:
Democrats have grown more supportive of this [amnesty] policy, from 71% in 2013, when the question was first asked, to 76% today. Republicans have become less likely to say that immigrants living in the U.S. illegally should be allowed a way to become citizens provided they meet certain requirements (43%) than they were in 2013 (53%). Today, 13% of Republicans say they would prefer undocumented immigrants to be eligible for permanent residency status but not citizenship, and 44% say all immigrants living in the U.S. illegally should be deported.
The poll does not include any questions that highlight most Americans’ agreement that the government should favor Americans over immigrants, especially for jobs.
Many polls show that labor migration is deeply unpopular because it damages ordinary Americans’ career opportunities, cuts their wages, and raises their rents. Migration also curbs Americans’ productivity, shrinks their political clout, widens regional wealth gaps, and wrecks their democratic, compromise-promoting civic culture.
For many years, a wide variety of pollsters have shown deep and broad opposition to labor migration and the inflow of temporary contract workers into jobs sought by young U.S. graduates.
This opposition is multiracial, cross-sex, non-racist, class-based, bipartisan, rational, persistent, and recognizes the solidarity Americans owe to each other. The polling — and the census data — debunks the 1950s claim by Mayorkas and other advocates that Americans must live in a “nation of immigrants.”
Yet business and progressive groups repeatedly insist that 300 million Americans must subordinate their priorities to the goals of migrants. “Citizenship Day is a reminder that the job of every single one of us is to ensure that America remains a country worthy of immigrants’ aspirations,” President Joe Biden said in a September 17 video. The same pro-migrant message is being pushed by his border chief, Alexandria Mayorkas:
No comments:
Post a Comment