BLM = DOMESTIC TERRORISM!
BLM activist threatens 'bloodshed' if New York's new Mayor Eric Adams dares tackle crime
New York City's voters, who elected black Democrat Eric Adams mayor on an anti-crime platform, have, to say the least, spoken.
But that hasn't stopped a particularly crazy leader of the Black Lives Matter movement from threatening "bloodshed" if Adams dares carry out his anti-crime pledge to voters.
According to the New York Post:
A Black Lives Matter leader vowed there’ll be “riots,” “fire” and “bloodshed” if Mayor-elect Eric Adams follows through with his promise to bring back plainclothes anti-crime cops to battle New York’s surge in violent crimes.
New York BLM co-founder Hawk Newsome debated the plan for a return to tougher policing with Adams during a contentious sit-down at Brooklyn Borough Hall Wednesday that was livestreamed on Instagram.
Although Adams found common ground with the activists on plans to fight poverty in the black community, the former NYPD captain said he’ll be reinstating a revamped version of the undercover anti-crime unit that was disbanded at the height of widespread police protests last year.
“If they think they are going back to the old ways of policing then we’re going to take to the streets again,” New York BLM co-founder Hawk Newsome said outside Borough Hall after the meeting.
“There will be riots. There will be fire, and there will be bloodshed,” he threatened.
According to the New York Daily News:
"Prepare for the worst."
In the past, Newsome's suggested his threats were literal:
His rhetoric has grown increasingly incendiary. “If this country doesn’t give us what we want, then we will burn down this system and replace it,” said Newsome in a Fox News interview last year. “All right? And I could be speaking figuratively. I could be speaking literally. It’s a matter of interpretation.”
And if threats of riots and "bloodshed" aren't enough to force Adams to dance to his tune, he's also claiming he's got support on the inside, according to my transcription from Fox News's Ingraham Angle video:
"We have people in city council, who can create problems for him. We have people in the streets who can create problems for this administration by shutting it down."
Adams has dismissed Newsome as a "small fringe group" and stated that he intends to carry out his platform, which suggests some very level-headed mayoring ahead if he carries that out.
The New York Post has exposed Newsome as a loser whose branch of Black Lives Matter is so looney even the main group (the one with the mansion-buying sprees) disavows ties to him, which does suggest he's way out there. The Post reports that he's a high-school dropout, he's lost his IRS tax-exempt status for refusal to file forms about how he spend the cash he collects, and given his own activity, he seems to be someone for who criminals might just be natural allies.
That would at a minimum explain why he's so furious about Adams bringing back the plainclothes unit to protest mainly black and brown New Yorkers from violent thugs.
Adams seems to recognize this and feels confident he's got it under control. All the same there are troubling indicators that it might not be that easy for him.
One, Newsome seems to have become the thug's lobby, upset that cops might just come looking for the criminals he's sticking up for under the rubric of "racial justice," while BLM continues to allow him to use their name, despite disavowing him.
Two, the mainstream press seems to be in his corner. Look at this grotesque headline from local NBC4:
Eric Adams Feuds With Black Lives Matter Leaders Over Proposed New NYPD Anti-Gun Unit
Feuds?
No, we have a maniac issuing violent threats, and he's stated in the past that his threats may be literal. That's being done in the name of criminals' interests and may well be a crime itself, quite possibly enhanced given that it's directed at an elected official. To call this a 'feud' is beyond dishonest.
And why is Eric Adams the one who's leading this phony "feud"? Newsome is the one who started the threats, Adams is the one who gave a calm and reasoned response, with no backing down. Adams started nothing. Newsome was the freak who went on the attack.
The kid-gloves treatment from this local report from PIX11 isn't much better.
This is media malfeasance at its worst and sure enough, a clown like Newsome knows it, playing them like a fiddle.
The third factor is whether Newsome has the support he claims to have on the inside. While it's absolutely certain that Adams has the support of the voters -- just look at these comments from New York City voters on the matter of Newsome's threats, it doesn't take a lot of people to completely suborn and upturn a system. That goes back to Lenin, and it's certainly something Mexico's cartels know. Newsome, the criminal's advocate, likely does too. Does New York have enough criminals to give his threats to Adams legs?
This shouldn't even be an issue. A maniac has threatened an elected official and ought to be dealt with on those terms.
Would-be thief fatally shot by Lakeview homeowner in shootout, police say
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeaeO3W7fd8
NYPD: Man Sexually Assaulted 13-Year-Old Walking Home From School
East Cleveland police: 3 in custody, more wanted after woman tortured before murder
Rutgers U. Faculty Groups Support Prof Who Said White People Are ‘Villains’ that Must Be ‘Taken Out’
Black Lives Matter Threaten Mostly Peaceful "Riots", "Fire" and "Bloodshed"
The New York outpost of the mostly peaceful racist black nationalist hate group is at it again threatening a black mayor.
Leaders of the city’s Black Lives Matter movement on Wednesday threatened “riots” and “bloodshed” in the streets if Mayor-elect Eric Adams reverses the abolition of the NYPD’s controversial anti-crime units.
“If he thinks that they’re going to go back to the old ways of policing, then we are going to take to the streets again. There will be riots, there will be fire and there will be bloodshed because we believe in defending our people,” said Hawk Newsome, co-founder of Black Lives Matter of Greater New York, after a heated meeting with Adams in Brooklyn Borough Hall.
Can we start calling BLM a violent terrorist group now?
Part of this is that Adams is making it very clear that he's not going to be pushed around.
The incoming mayor erupted when Hawk Newsome told him the organization would hold him responsible for any future misconduct by NYPD officers.
Adams replied: “You’re on the ground: Stop the violence in my community. I’m holding you accountable.
I'm guessing that calling Adams a white supremacist is not going to work very well.
Meanwhile BLM has demonstrated yet again that it's a violent hate group that engages in political terrorism. And yet our political class will insist that it's the new civil rights movement which is entirely "above politics" and may not be criticized.
IT'S TIME FOR A SICK OF BLACK VIOLENCE, LOOTING AND RACISM MOVEMENT!
IF WHITE AMERICA IS SO 'RACIST' WHO THE FUCK ELECTED BARACK OBAMA, A MAN WHO NEVER DID A SINGLE THING FOR BLACK AMERICA? WHO ENABLED MICHELLE OBAMA GET INTO HARVARD LAW DESPITE THE FACT SHE WASN'T QUALIFIED TO GET INTO ANY LAW SCHOOL. WHO MADE OPRAH WINFREY A BILLIONAIRE. NOT BLACK AMERICA!
BLACK LIVES MATTER CO-FOUNDER PURCHASES $1.4 MILLION HOME IN 0.4% BLACK COMMUNITY
BLACK RACISM, ANTI-SEMITISM, ANTI-ASIAN, HOMOPHOBIC, VIOLENCE AND IGNORANCE AS DISPLAYED BY THIS CLOWN CHAPPELLE
Comedian Dave Chappelle’s The Closer: A racist tirade disguised as stand-up comedy
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2021/10/dave-chappelle-one-more-racist-black.htm
Blacks are also overrepresented among perpetrators of hate crimes—by 50 percent—according to the most recent Justice Department data from 2017; whites are underrepresented by 24 percent. This is particularly true for anti-gay and anti-Semitic hate crimes.
BLACK LIVES MURDER AND LOOT AND HAVE FOR A VERY LONG TIME!
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2021/11/black-terrorism-in-america-murder-loot.html
Dr. Williams comments on another reality: that the rate of black homicide and armed robbery as well as other violent crimes are as is as much as 15–30 times more than whites
In reality, BLM is the very embodiment of Marxism, anti-Semitism, and racism—a trifecta of wickedness capable of destroying any society. John Perazzo
Blacks are also overrepresented among perpetrators of hate crimes—by 50 percent—according to the most recent Justice Department data from 2017; whites are underrepresented by 24 percent. This is particularly true for anti-gay and anti-Semitic hate crimes.
THE DEPRAVED GHETTO BLACK CULTURE IN AMERICA - Is it the world’s most violent subculture?
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2019/10/ghetto-black-violence-in-america-dr.html
Dr. Williams comments on another reality: that the rate of black homicide and armed robbery as well as other violent crimes are as is as much as 15–30 times more than whites
So, we have local black gang associates posting terror threats on social media -- threats of murder, by burning, directed at the women and children family members of white police employees -- immediately before the murder, by burning, of the white teenage daughter of a local police department employee. Plus, the killing took place only minutes after the victim was seen on video at the same location as the husband or boyfriend of the person who posted the threats, as he was filling a handheld can with gasoline.
Travis Scott has repeatedly given a snarling middle finger to the safety of his fans and this deadly, predictable disaster is a direct result of his arrogant and shameful recklessness
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2021/11/travis-scott-reminds-america-of-joke-of.html
CRT Co-Founder: Children Should Learn U.S. Ground Is ‘Soaked in Blood of Theft’
Professor Kimberlé Crenshaw, a co-founder of critical race theory (CRT), explained the importance of “looking at history to understand our present” while calling for youth to “understand the ground upon which we stand is ground that’s soaked in blood of theft.” She warned of the outcome if the “other side gets its way,” declaring “the road to authoritarianism will be paved through white supremacy.”
Crenshaw made her comments while appearing on British-American TV anchor Mehdi Hasan’s eponymous Sunday night MSNBC program, The Mehdi Hasan Show.
Hasan attributed Republican Glenn Youngkin’s recent “upset” victory in the Virginia governor race to the latter highlighting CRT — which the MSNBC host described as an “academic legal theory,” which is neither “critical” nor “theory” and which many “haters” admit they do not fully grasp.
“[Youngkin] went all in on CRT which is nothing if not a buzzword for all the racist words you are not allowed to say and for all the history you’re not allowed to teach about America’s past,” he said. “And surely the issue motivated parents. But as a wedge issue, it really motivated white voters.”
“According to the exit polls: among voters who said, ‘parents should have a lot to say in what schools teach’ … Youngkin got 90 percent of the white vote and only 19 percent of the black vote,” Hasan added.
Crenshaw, who is also executive director for the African American Policy Forum and helped form CRT in the 1980s, described the concept as “a way of looking at the world that we have inherited after a legacy of segregation, of slavery, of Manifest Destiny, [and] of genocide.”
Calling it a link between “contemporary issues around racial inequality” and the “laws and policies that produce those very inequalities,” Crenshaw said, “it’s basically looking at the grounds upon which we stand, excavating those aspects of our history that have produced many of the problems that we still deal with.”
As an example, she cited current differences between black and white wealth being attributed to “how the suburbs were built and [how] they excluded African-Americans.”
“So it’s basically just looking at history to understand our present, that’s it,” she added, “but that’s not why they’re against it.”
Hasan then sought to clarify that CRT does not teach that white children are “oppressors,” made to “feel guilty” or “evil” for their white skin, and black children are “victims” — “as Republicans and even some self-proclaimed liberals like [HBO Real Time host] Bill Maher claim” it does.
In response, Crenshaw referred to such depictions as old and false arguments, though she avoids explaining how.
In this Feb. 2, 2019, file photo, Kimberle Crenshaw participates in the ‘Reconstruction: America After Civil War’ panel during the PBS presentation at the Television Critics Association Winter Press Tour at The Langham Huntington in Pasadena, Calif. Crenshaw, executive director of the African American Policy Forum, a social justice think tank based in New York City, was one of the early proponents of critical race theory. Initially, she says, it was “simply about telling a more complete story of who we are.” (Photo by Willy Sanjuan/Invision/AP, File)
“The oldest page in the book pushing back against racial integration has been to frame it as an attack on white people,” she said. “Civil rights laws were framed as discrimination against white people, integration of schools was framed as an attack on children, [and] reconstruction was framed as an attack on white women.”
“These arguments are the oldest ones in the book,” she added. “The only thing that is shocking about it, honestly, is that it is so easy to repeat them, it’s so easy to rehearse them.”
That is why, according to Crenshaw, Bill Maher “actually repeats that stuff — because he probably never learned what the truth is.”
Crenshaw also warned of the threat of authoritarianism in the event that “the story” is banned.
“If the other side gets its way, which is to completely ban conversations, books, [and] histories that tell the story, then a whole ‘nother generation will believe these lies and will not be able to understand that the true threat that we face right now is the threat of authoritarianism,” she said.
“That’s what this is about: the road to authoritarianism will be paved through white supremacy,” she added.
Calling responding to right-wing attacks on CRT education as a “catch 22,” she clarified that “no students in K-12 are being taught the Dred Scott case that said black people can never be Americans but what is taught is the history of slavery, a little bit of it; what is taught is the Trail of Tears, a little bit of it,” she said.
“So the point is that there are moments where our young people should learn our history. They should understand the ground upon which we stand is ground that’s soaked in blood of theft,” she added.
Claiming “racial appeals work in this country because there is still a lot of racism or at least racial resentment in America today,” Hasan followed up by saying that many, including Democrats, are “uncomfortable about suggesting a lot of white voters are susceptible to racist dog-whistles” and choose to hide behind euphemisms instead.
In response, Crenshaw claimed that was “precisely what critical race theory has been about all these years.”
“Many have been focused on how the inability to talk about race, the inability to see how it’s structured in our society, the inability to think about racism as anything other than moral turpitude or a psychological problem, has made it impossible for the media and others to identify racial projects when they’re happening,” she said.
“That is not an approach to deal with racism — we saw that on January 6 with the confederate flag marching right back into the capital,” she added. “So if we don’t have the ability to address racism, we won’t be able to save our democracy.”
Hasan concluded by claiming the “books they are always offended by or consider explicit … it always seems to be books from black authors or about black historical themes,” to which Crenshaw agreed, saying that books about social injustices “cause discomfort” and therefore are not welcome to be taught “so nobody has to find the actual definition of critical race theory to know what this is about.”
“This is what’s motivating the racial justice movements, so don’t let them take away what we want to pass on to the next generation: the ability to read our history and to know where the fight has to be,” she added.
The battle over CRT in schools has resulted in nationwide tension in recent months.
People talk before the start of a rally against “critical race theory” (CRT) being taught in schools at the Loudoun County Government center in Leesburg, Virginia on June 12, 2021. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)
The theory, which is promoted by many on the left, claims that American institutions — the government, economy, and culture — are based on racial hierarchy and aim at maintaining the dominance of white people, and even that which appears race-neutral is, on closer inspection, rooted in racism.
As a result, it urges reform in virtually all of the country’s institutions.
The theory’s architects have argued that the U.S. was founded on theft of land and labor, with federal law maintaining the unequal treatment of citizens by their race.
CRT advocates have also expressed the belief that race is culturally invented, not biological.
Last week, a Science, Technology, Engineering, Math (STEM) educator and administrator in the largest school district in Indiana addressed parents in a video in which he asserted when school officials say they are not teaching CRT, “we’re lying.”
In June, a former Democrat congressional candidate called on Americans to listen to black parents who oppose CRT “indoctrination” in schools, while calling on black Americans to reject the Democrat Party’s race narrative and, instead, realize “that their skin color is not a barrier to their progress,” adding that Democrats use race to galvanize black electorate support though many black Americans actually “have conservative ideals.”
Follow Joshua Klein on Twitter @JoshuaKlein.
No comments:
Post a Comment