Tuesday, January 11, 2022

JOE BIDEN'S BILLIONAIRES FOR OPEN BORDERS LIVING IN TERROR OF HAVING TO PAY LEGALS A LIVING WAGE - Another Buffalo Starbucks Outlet Votes to Unionize

 

Another Buffalo Starbucks Outlet Votes to Unionize

The Starbucks logo is see at a supermarket in Las Mercedes district in Caracas, on December 23, 2021. (Photo by Federico PARRA / AFP) (Photo by FEDERICO PARRA/AFP via Getty Images)
FEDERICO PARRA/AFP via Getty
3:04

A second Starbucks store voted Monday to unionize near Buffalo, New York, with staff concerns about coronavirus procedures cited as driving the move.

The outlet in the suburb of Cheektowaga, near Buffalo, voted 15 to 9 in favour of unionizing with Workers United, an affiliate of the Service Employees International Union.

The initial vote took place in December 2021, but it was confirmed on Monday by the National Labor Relations Board, making them one of the first out of more than 8,000 stores in the U.S. to unionize.

Starbucks is considering whether to appeal to the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) decision to allow unionization, and has ten days to do so. In the initial vote the labor board sided with the Starbucks union disregarding votes against unionization, citing these employees worked at a different store, which Starbucks may choose to appeal.

The company has insisted its stores function better when there is a direct relationship between management and the employees, and not through a third party.

“We’ve been clear in our belief that we are better together as partners, without a union between us at Starbucks, and that conviction has not changed,” a Starbucks spokesman speaking to Reuters said.

In a statement distributed by Workers United, the Cheektowaga store shift supervisor, Lexi Rizzo said, “Finally, the partners feel we have a voice at our workplace.”

The vote to implement unions at the two store in Buffalo has had a knock on effect, with individual stores across the U.S. in Massachusetts, Arizona, Oregon, Illinois, Colorado, Tennessee and Seattle petitioning the labor board for union elections. Another three stores in Buffalo are also seeking to hold union votes, AP News reports.

Starbucks has made several changes to support staff throughout the pandemic, they provide sick pay as well as full pay for up to two self-isolation periods, if one of their employees catches coronavirus, and the stores are regularly cleaned and sanitized.

In some areas with high coronavirus cases, Starbucks operates a “grab and go” policy to protect staff and customers alike.

These precautions however did not stop employees from the original unionized Buffalo store from walking out, and demanding Starbucks do more to protect them on the 5th of January 2020, forcing Starbucks to close the store.

The Associated Press

Starbucks employees alter a campaign sign during a press conference after their union-election viewing party Thursday, Dec. 9, 2021, in Buffalo, N.Y. Starbucks workers at a store in Buffalo, voted to unionize on Thursday, a first for the 50-year-old coffee retailer in the U.S. (AP Photo/Joshua Bessex)

On top of the above ‘safety’ measures Workers United on behalf of the Starbucks employees demanded workers are given the power to enforce mask mandates for customers as well as for Starbucks to provide employees with N95 masks, coronavirus testing kits and hazard pay.

Employees returned to the store on Monday 10th of January, with a mediation of more hand washing and the implementation of the cafe sanitization routines the employees had requested.

THE DEMOCRAT PARTY'S PLATFORM FOR OPEN BORDERS AND DEPRESSED WAGES

BARACK OBAMA and ERIC HOLDER’S SABOTAGE OF HOMELAND SECURITY: The “zero tolerance” program was dismantled by Attorney General Erc Holder once it had successfully cut the transit of migrants by roughly 95 percent. Initially, officials made 140,000 arrests per year in the mid-2000s, but the northward flow dropped so much that officials only had to make 6,000 arrests in 2013, according to a 2014 letter by two pro-migration Senators, Sen. Jeff Flake and John McCain. NEIL MUNRO


The U.S. Chamber of Commerce exerts extraordinary influence in D.C.. Without an adequate number of ICE agents, employers who violate the immigration laws go undiscovered and unpunished.  Additionally, all too many politicians from both parties are globalists and all too many members of Congress are lawyers.  Some, in fact, are immigration lawyers who don’t see illegal aliens as a problem but as clients for their friends, or, perhaps for themselves when they leave Congress and resume their legal practices. MICHALE CUTLER FRONTPAG MAG


OBAMA - BIDENomics: "While America’s working and middle class have been subjected to compete for jobs against a constant flow of cheaper foreign workers — where more than 1.2 million mostly low-skilled immigrants are admitted to the country annually — the  billionaire class has experienced historic  salary gains."                                                                                     Sen. Josh Hawley

 The clients of the USCC are the big international corporations and Wall Street.  Collectively, they loathe Trump's MAGA agenda from immigration control to renegotiated trade deals to support of small businesses, and especially to the president taking on China.

Exclusive — Kevin McCarthy: Chamber of Commerce ‘Left’ Republican Party ‘A Long Time Ago,’ Not Welcome Back

Matthew Perdie / Breitbart News, Jack Knudsen / Breitbart News
0 seconds of 1 minute, 46 secondsVolume 90%
2:59

House GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy told Breitbart News that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has no place in the modern Republican Party and that the big business lobby is not going to be welcome back if and when Republicans are back in power.

McCarthy’s comments came during the latest On The Hill long-form video special, taped in December at an Eastern Market establishment on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC.

“The Chamber left the party a long time ago,” McCarthy said. “In the last election, the Chamber supported Democrats. The Chamber gave a higher score to Democrats who are voting for this policy because they signed some letter then voted the opposite of what the letter said than Kevin Brady who was chair of Ways and Means and brought us the tax cuts. I just assume they have as much influence in the future as they do now—none. Our responsibility is to the American public. That is who’s going to drive it. If special interests are the American public then they’ll have a say, but it’s the American public we’re going to.”

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 13: House Ways and Means Committee Ranking Member Kevin Brady (R-TX) speaks during a hearing with U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai on Capitol Hill on May 13, 2021 in Washington DC. U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai took questions from members about President Biden’s 2021 trade policy agenda. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

House Ways and Means Committee ranking member Kevin Brady (R-TX) speaks during a hearing on Capitol Hill on May 13, 2021, in Washington, DC. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

McCarthy is correct that the Chamber backed several vulnerable Democrats in the 2020 congressional elections, endorsing them over Republicans and perhaps preserving the Democrat majority in the process. Had Republicans flipped just a handful more seats—they flipped a net 15 from Democrats in 2020—they would have the majority instead of the Democrats right now. The Chamber, which endorsed 23 House Democrats in 2020, may have made the difference in helping keep the Democrats in the majority as some of the members the business group endorsed survived tight reelection races.

If five or more of the Chamber-backed Democrats who survived in 2020, like Reps. Cindy Axne (D-IA), Abigail Spanberger (D-VA), Elaine Luria (D-VA), Susie Lee (D-NV), Dean Phillips (D-MN), or Angie Craig (D-MN) among others, did not survive their reelection bids then the Republicans would be in the U.S. House majority right now.

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 24: Rep. Abigail Spanberger (C) (D-VA) and Rep. Elaine Luria (R) (D-VA) are trailed by reporters after leaving a House Democratic caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol where formal impeachment proceedings against U.S. President Donald Trump were announced by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi September 24, 2019 in Washington, DC. Spanberger and Luria are two of seven freshman members of the House with national intelligence or military backgrounds who recently spoke out in an opinion piece calling for an investigation of Trump. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Reps. Abigail Spanberger and Elaine Luria are trailed by reporters after leaving a House Democratic caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol September 24, 2019, in Washington, DC. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

McCarthy’s comments on this come as more broadly the business community and Republicans have grown apart, especially in the wake of the January 6, 2021, riot at the Capitol. In the immediate aftermath of that event, many large corporations cut off Republicans who challenged the 2020 election results that day. McCarthy went on to generally agree that businesses getting overtly political is not good for their bottom line.

“The thing I see that’s happening in the corporate world is they’re becoming woke,” McCarthy said. “Their philosophy should be running their business, not going day to day about what’s happening in politics. They have a right to do what they want, but I don’t think they’ll be as productive if they lose sight of why the shareholders buy their stock which is to run a business and efficiency of that.”

Watch the full-length interview with Kevin McCarthy:

Matthew Perdie / Breitbart News, Jack Knudsen / Breitbart News
0 seconds of 1 hour, 6 minutes, 30 secondsVolume 90%

Politicsbig business lobbyChamber of CommerceDemocratsKevin McCarthyNancy PelosiOn the HillRepublican Party

Chamber of Commerce Lobbying Against Democrat Agenda by House Democrats They Endorsed

Abby Finkenauer for Congress/Facebook

JOHN BINDER

25 Sep 202012

2:07

The United States Chamber of Commerce is lobbying against legislation by House Democrats that they recently endorsed against Republican challengers.

This month, the Chamber of Commerce endorsed 23 House Democrats in vital swing districts that Republicans are hoping to win. One of those Democrats endorsed by the Chamber is Rep. Abby Finkenauer (D-IA) of Iowa’s 1st congressional district, a seat previously held by Rep. Rod Blum (R-IA).

Less than a month after endorsing Finkenauer against her Republican challenger, Ashley Hinson, the Chamber is fighting off an amendment by Finkenauer to the “Clean Economy Jobs and Innovation Act” — another indication of the Chamber’s dwindling relevance.

The Chamber’s Senior Vice President, Jack Howard, sent out an alert to its members noting their opposition to Finkenauer’s amendment, which they say will “impose an array of labor and employment restrictions on contractors performing work under this bill.”

In an exclusive report, Breitbart News noted the Chamber’s recent political turmoil.

One insider called the Chamber “an elitist organization,” while another said their Democrat endorsements were “what happens when the Washington swamp and Wall Street get together in Nancy Pelosi’s conference room and make a deal.”

The number of small businesses paying dues to the Chamber stands at less than 7,000 today, according to sources with knowledge. In its heyday, the Chamber had about 130,000 small businesses paying dues.

In response, President Trump and Vice President Mike Pence reportedly criticized the Chamber in a phone call. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) has publicly said he does not want the Chamber’s endorsement, characterizing the group as sell-outs.

The Chamber has not responded to Breitbart News’s requests for comment.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder. 

 

The clients of the USCC are the big international corporations and Wall Street.  Collectively, they loathe Trump's MAGA agenda from immigration control to renegotiated trade deals to support of small businesses, and especially to the president taking on China.

Betrayal by the US Chamber of Commerce

 

By Peter Skurkiss

 

Next to the presidential election, the focal point in November is on races for the House.  Should the Republicans take control, power would be stripped from such dangerous people as Nancy Pelosi (speaker of the House), Adam Schiff (chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence) and Jerry Nadler (chairman of the House Judiciary Committee), thus preventing a continuation of the politics of personal destruction aimed at President Trump.  Should the Democrats maintain their majority in the House, however, expect a rerun of 2016–2019.

Also, should the election results be contested or severely muddled, the composition of the House after January 2021 could well determine who gets the presidency under the Twelfth Amendment. 

 

Given what is at stake, it is disheartening although not surprising to see the U.S. Chamber of Commerce endorsing 23 Democrat candidates for the House.  What makes this more galling is that these 23 are freshmen congressmen and considered highly vulnerable.  This prompted House minority leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) to swear off any USCC endorsementsaying: "It is hypocrisy that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce would endorse Democrats that are part of this socialist agenda that is driving this country out, and it's fighting the president."

There are several reasons why Tom Donohue's USCC is doing this.  Kimberly Strassel of the Wall Street Journal speculates that it's a combination of a dubious strategy plus a bow to political correctness.  On political correctness, the organization is under pressure from high-tech companies and Wall Street to focus on climate change, diversity, raising energy taxes, and the like.  The Chamber's website already celebrates things like Black Lives Matter and Women's Equality Day.  Endorsing these at-risk Democrats and possibly preventing a GOP takeover of the House is further proof that the Chamber is "woke."

As for the Chamber's strategic thinking, Strassel sees it as trying to make nice with swing-seat Democrats in the absurd hope they will reciprocate when it comes to voting on issues important to the USCC.  Furious local members from around the country see the Chamber's leadership as being extremely gullible to think these Democrats will ever stand with business when the chips are down.  They're right.

Although Strassel doesn't mention it, it's hard to believe that Donald Trump doesn't figure prominently in the Chamber's calculation.  It will do anything to prevent the president's re-election, whatever the consequences to free markets, the country, and its own credibility.  The clients of the USCC are the big international corporations and Wall Street.  Collectively, they loathe Trump's MAGA agenda from immigration control to renegotiated trade deals to support of small businesses, and especially to the president taking on China.

What's likely to befall the USCC is this.  It will alienate much of its local membership and the Republican Party.  And when Trump wins in November, the USCC will become even a greater pariah in Washington than it is now.  And for what?  The vain hope the radical Dems might cooperate with its business agenda?  Endorsing these 23 vulnerable Democrats was a foolish move by a foolish organization.  It seems Joe Biden isn't the only one suffering from dementia.  The 82-year-old Donohue might be as well.  

 

DHS Quietly Opens ‘Overstay’ Door to Economic Migrants

US border
Associated Press
7:20

Almost 685,000 foreign visitors stayed in the United States past their legally required departure date in the 12 months up to September 30, 2020, according to a report released January 10 by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

Yet President Joe Biden’s appointees at DHS — left by secretary Alejandro Mayorkas — are now reducing protections against “overstay” illegal migrants, many of whom take jobs from Americans, says Jessica Vaughan, the director of Policy Studies for the Center for Immigration Studies:

Much of the attention of policymakers is on the border itself, the land border, and not enough on the side doors through which people come with a visa but then end up staying here illegally. These overstayers are a very significant chunk of the illegal population. We don’t know exactly how many there are, but we know it’s at least 40 percent [of the illegal population, and] they tend to be more white-collar workers because they had to qualify for a [visitor or work] visa in the first place.

President Donald Trump and his deputies launched programs to reduce the overstay population, she added. But Mayorkas and his allies have rolled back those protections, such as penalties for overstaying graduates from U.S. colleges, she said:

Now, we have Biden loosening standards for issuing the non-immigrant visas and broadcasting that immigration enforcement in the interior area has been nearly snuffed out by policy. So we should be very concerned that for the foreseeable future, there are going to be even more people trying to get these visas to get into the country because they know that if they get here, they’ll be able to stay in all likelihood. I expect the problem to get much worse.

In December, two GOP Senators charged that officials delayed the release of the September 2020 report. The purpose of the delay was to protect the Democrats’ unpopular amnesty proposals within the pending Build Back Better spending bill, the two Senators claimed.

In 2021, Biden and his deputies allowed roughly 1.5 million migrants into the United States — or almost one migrant for every two children born during the year. That huge population included roughly 500,000 illegals, a few hundred thousand legal immigrants and visa workers, at least 50,000 refugees, plus 671,000 migrants who were allowed across the southern border under an expanding variety of legal pretexts, such as asylum or family reunification.

The additional numbers for the visa overstays in Biden’s first eight months will not be released until at least September 2022.

A migrant from Colombia injects himself with insulin after crossing the United States and Mexico border to turn himself over to authorities on May 13, 2021 in Yuma, Arizona. (RINGO CHIU/AFP via Getty Images)

GOP legislators rarely complain about — or vote against — visa overstays, partly because the overstay migrants help businesses by serving as workers, consumers, and renters. Instead, GOP leaders prefer to spotlight the border chaos to help boost the election-day turnout of their electoral base.

The 2020 visa overstay numbers are unique. They include numbers from five months before the coro0nanvirus disaster and then from seven months when few visitors were allowed and many visitors were in no rush to return home. The DHS report says:

Due to the COVID-19 outbreak, the FY 2020 data represents an anomaly when compared with the prevailing trend of decreasing Expected Departures and Overstay. Expected Departures in FY 2020 (46,195,116) were 17.40 percent lower than in FY 2019 (55,928,990)  … CBP calculated a total overstay rate of 1.48 percent, or 684,499 overstay events.

Roughly one-third of the overstays return home after one year, the report noted:

At the end of FY 2019 [30 September 2019], the overall Suspected In-Country Overstay number – i.e., those for whom the Department did not have evidence of a departure or transition to another immigration status – was 676,422 or 1.03 percent. [One year later] As of September 30, 2020 … the FY 2019 Suspected In-Country Overstay rate 0.59 percent.

Almost 28,000 foreign workers and student/workers overstayed their visas:

For nonimmigrants who entered on a student or exchange visitor visa (F, M, or J visa), the FY 2020 Suspected In-Country Overstay rate is 1.55 percent of the 1,801,550 students and exchange visitors scheduled to complete their program in the United States.

The report noted that 19,044 Indians overstayed their visas, including roughly 4,112 with F, M, or J work-eligible visas. That number is significant because Indians provide a huge share of the temporary foreign workers in Fortune 500 jobs — and a large share of the white-collar illegal population.

The overstays also include 73,000 Mexicans:

For Mexico, the FY 2020 Suspected In-Country Overstay rate for those traveling through air and sea POEs is 2.39 percent of 3,055,056 expected departures. This represents overstays by people who arrived by air and sea POEs and does not include overstays by people who arrived by land.

The report hid the data about overstays by foreign workers who legally enter B-1/B-2 visas but then illegally take jobs. The rate of B-1/B-2 overstays is high for visitors from Chile, France, Poland, China, Egypt, the Philippines.

Poor countries had the highest share of overstays, although they also contributed few visitors. This category includes Sudan, Eritrea, Nepal, Afghanistan, Benin, Burundi, and Chad.

Many polls show that Americans want to like immigrants and immigration. But the bipartisan federal government has exploited that openness since 1990 to extract tens of millions of migrants from poor countries to boost U.S. businesses as workers, consumers, and renters.

Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) questions Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on oversight of the Department of Homeland Security, on Capitol Hill November 16, 2021 in Washington, DC.  (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

That economic strategy is harmful to ordinary Americans: It cuts their career opportunities and their wages while it also raises their housing costs.

The strategy also curbs Americans’ productivity, shrinks their political clout, widens regional wealth gapsradicalizes their democratic, compromise-promoting civic culture, and allows elites to ignore despairing Americans at the bottom of society.

Unsurprisingly, a wide variety of little-publicized polls do show deep and broad opposition to labor migration and the inflow of temporary contract workers into jobs sought by young U.S. graduates.

This opposition is growinganti-establishmentmultiracialcross-sexnon-racistclass-based,  bipartisanrationalpersistent, and recognizes the solidarity that Americans owe to each other.

 

 

No comments: