America Faces No Greater Threat Than Joe Biden and the Democrat Party. Their Assault to Our Borders Is As Great As Their Assault to Free Speech and Free Elections
Wednesday, May 11, 2022
DESTROYING AMERICA - THE RULING CLASS AND THEIR PARASITIC LAWYERS - THE PIG PARASITE CLINTON LAWYERS: But it was the Hillary Clinton campaign that colluded with Russian sources to develop the phony Steele dossier intending to influence the 2016 election in favor of Hillary Clinton.
THERE IS NO GREATER CRIME WAVE OR THREAT TO
AMERICA THAN THE BRIBES SUCKING DEMOCRAT PARTY OF
BOTOOMLESS BANKSTER BAILOUTS AND BILLIONAIRES FOR OPEN
BORDERS!
PIG LYING LAWYER MAYORKAS:
Homeland Secretary Mayorkas speaks words he knows are false while simultaneously contradicting himself. The southern border “is secure,” he said, even though 2 million individuals entered illegally last year. At the same time, Mayorkas has prevented entrance of asylum seekers from Cuba and Haiti.
Duplicity is fundamental to the Democrats’ entire political operation. They say one thing and do another, simple hypocrisy, and then double the duplicity by falsely accusing others of doing what they just did. This is progressive Democrats’ primary political tactic.
Democrats claim that Republicans are racist. Yet progressives push an ideology, CRT, that labels white people as oppressors, they are the racists. They viciously attack black women such as Winsome Sears (Lieutenant-Governor of Virginia) and talk show host Candace Owens because they are conservative. Democrats’ duplicity is doubled as they exonerate progressive activists who hate and attack conservatives.
Jay Rosen, a progressive NYU professor and frequent guest on CNN, gave an interview glorifying Democrats’ distorted view of (alternate) reality. Rosen claimed the Democrat party was “normal” while Republicans were “authoritarian,” even tyrannical. According to him, Biden’s mandates are normal and obviously not authoritarian. Rosen urged mainstream media to cover Republicans “differently” than Democrats. Double duplicity.
During the first week of his presidency, Joe Biden declared, “the Federal Government has a responsibility to prevent ... intolerance against everyone in America, including Asian Americans.” Yet Biden’s Solicitor General, Elizabeth Prelogar, officially countenanced using race to discriminate against Asian-American college applicants, viz., Harvard.
The most egregious example of double duplicity is the Russia collusion hoax. For more than three years, Democrats, their bureaucrat henchmen, and the legacy media bombarded the public with innuendoes and leaked falsehoods that Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 presidential election. This allegation has been completely debunked. But it was the Hillary Clinton campaign that colluded with Russian sources to develop the phony Steele dossier intending to influence the 2016 election in favor of Hillary Clinton.
When Elon Musk bought Twitter for $43 billion, Elizabeth Warren vilified him as a “danger to our democracy,” claiming Musk intended to stifle free speech on Twitter. In fact, Musk has repeatedly said he intends to restore free speech by stopping Twitter’s suppression of conservative thought and by preventing Twitter from banning those who are unpopular with progressives, like the 45th President of the U.S.
When BLM activist, Quintez Brown, shot a gun into the office of Louisville mayoral candidate, Craig Greenberg, progressives set up a crowd funding site for his bail. Yet Progressives prevented crowdfunding for Kyle Rittenhouse’s defense.
President Biden recently created a Ministry of Misinformation and Disinformation, reminiscent of George Orwell’s Ministry of Truth (from 1984.) Washington itself has been spreading both dis- as well as misinformation straight from the lips of Anthony Fauci. Democrat operatives such as Fauci, Birx, and Walensky labeled any scientific reports that disputed their narrative as “misinformation” and suppressed publication. With his new “Ministry,” Biden’s liars are going to regulate what is the truth!
“My body, my choice” is a Democrat war-cry when the subject is abortion. Yet, according to progressives, “your body” is Washington’s choice when they mandate injecting everyone with experimental mRNA gene therapy.
Based on the green new deal, President Biden severely restricted oil and gas production in the U.S. claiming he was protecting the environment. How does it help the environment when Biden has to beg Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Venezuela to increase their production of gas to compensate for our reduced production?
Homeland Secretary Mayorkas speaks words he knows are false while simultaneously contradicting himself. The southern border “is secure,” he said, even though 2 million individuals entered illegally last year. At the same time, Mayorkas has prevented entrance of asylum seekers from Cuba and Haiti.
Superficially, progressivism appears to be winning the culture and political wars. Progressives dominate U.S. education from kindergarten through university. Both political and regulatory entities in Washington are under their sway. The military has gone woke as have many large corporations such as Disney. And the legacy media – broadcast, print, and online – cancel, censor, or distort any communication that disputes the Democrat progressive/socialist narrative.
Even so, there is cause for optimism. The American public is waking up to what the Democrats’ double duplicity has done to the nation. They don’t like it.
The loss of U.S. energy independence forced us to beg hostile nations for oil. Biden opened a secure southern border to massive illegal immigration and a flood of drugs. The disastrous pullout from Afghanistan left Americans and allies to the mercies of the Taliban. Biden mis-handled CoViD; his CDC lied to the public. Department of Justice protects Democrats and BLM from being charged with illegal acts. Defund-the-police caused a dramatic rise in urban crime. Biden spent trillions we don’t have. Inflation is consuming Americans’ hard-earned dollars.
Every progressive decision above is immensely unpopular with Americans, especially the non-elite “deplorables,” the independents and minorities. When Biden was elected President, his approval rating was 57 percent. Now his disapproval rating is a similar number.
American patriots have begun to push back against progressive ideology and Democrat tyranny.
By rejecting CRT and transgender indoctrination in elementary schools, parents are re-asserting their proper role as primary educators of their children.
When Navy Seals refuse experimental injections (CoViD “vaccination”) knowing they will be “undeployable,” they assert their medical autonomy. The Nuremberg code for medical experimentation emphasizes, “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.”
Ninety percent of viewers, fed up with CNN’s fabricated news and progressive advocacy, has turned to other outlets for uncensored information.
When American truckers form their own freedom convoy, they are activating their First Amendment right “to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.”
Every poll taken in advance of the 2022 midterm election predicts a strong repudiation at the ballot box of progressive ideology and policies.
Will the current elites in Washington pay attention to the will of the people? I fear not, but hopefully, they will be replaced in November by elected officials who reflect American values and act to reverse progressive hypocrisy squared.
Deane Waldman, M.D., MBA is Professor Emeritus of Pediatrics, Pathology, and Decision Science; former director of the Center for Healthcare Policy at Texas Public Policy Foundation; former Director, New Mexico Health Insurance Exchange; and author of the multi-award-winning book Curing the Cancer in U.S. Healthcare: StatesCare and Market-Based Medicine
Thank goodness the U.S. Supreme Court seems to be ready to reverse Roe v. Wade. Because now, for the first time since January 6, 2021, it’s okay to protest again. And it’s okay to dox the home addresses of Supreme Court justices. And it’s okay to cry to the heavens that the world is coming to an end if the states get to set their own abortion laws.
It must be really cool to be the ruling class and set the agenda: who is a racist and who is a victim; who is a protester and who is an armed insurrectionist; who is a hater and who is an activist.
As Nazi Carl Schmitt wrote, politics is all about deciding who is a friend and who is an enemy.
Imagine: if you are former President Obama you get to call for increased government power to control the insurrectionist speech of Trump supporters one week, and the inviolable right of protesters to protest the end of a Supreme Court ukase on abortion the next. It all depends on the enemy and whose dox is being gored
I almost get the feeling that any ruling class is okay with a bit of rioting and destruction -- so long as it’s righteously committed by its supporters. You see this even in the Stamp Act riots in North America in 1765. They didn’t fall out of a clear blue sky. The printed media of the time and local politicians like Patrick Henry were full of invective against the injustice and the “despotism” of burdening good honest North Americans with direct taxes. Anyway, the rioters only destroyed the homes of the tax agents. Mostly peaceful.
In other words, my nickel says that most political violence down the ages is done with a nod and a wink from the higher-ups, the patricians if you like.
After all, the whole idea of the state is that it has a monopoly on violence. What’s the point of a monopoly if you don’t take advantage of it from time to time, just a little?
So if you hear about activists peacefully protesting for justice, you are not exactly taking 80 to 1 odds on Rich Strike when you assume that the activists in question are lefties and approved by the ruling class, the educated, the media, and the university: indeed the entire Cathedral. Hey, activists gotta activist.
What I don’t get is why the ruling class got itself into its current bind with double-digit inflation and the Fed having to crank up interest rates after two years of pedal-to-the-metal spending.
What is better for the political support of a political party? Control of the streets, or control of inflation? A ruling class can have a bit of fun any time gazing indulgently at its supporters enjoying a spot of rioting in the streets. But when inflation starts running riot then all bets are off, aren’t they, Jimmy Carter?
If I were running the ruling class, I would have started the Biden administration the way that Bill Clinton started his first term in office. Remember? Ole Bill had campaigned on the “worst economy in the last 50 years” and promised a gorgeous menu of goodies. But when he got into office in January 1993 all of a sudden, he looked at the numbers -- Oh No! -- and tearfully told us that he couldn’t offer all those goodies. No, he’d have to raise taxes. Then, when it was time to run for reelection, then it would be time to dangle all kinds of goodies in front of the voters.
Why not? Why not announce in February 2021 that the eeevil Donald Trump had sold out the nation to the Russians, and totally botched the response to COVID and printed money like you wouldn’t believe and so we were going to have to get COVID under our belt and get America back to work before “tackling” climate change. Of course, we’d still fight systemic racism to the last white oppressor, but, behind the curtain, we wouldn’t be shoveling trillions at DEI administrators.
But the Biden people didn’t do that. And now they are reduced to sending their rioters into the street in the hope that ordinary moms forget all about the price of meat and ordinary truckers forget about the price of diesel.
I think that before the Department of Homeland Security sets up a Disinformation Governance Board, or the Department of Justice sets up an Office of Environmental Justice, the Department of the Treasury needs to set up an Office of Inflation Equity, whose job will be to replenish the savings accounts of ordinary workers impoverished by government inflation using monies automatically deducted from the salaries and pensions of inflation-protected government bureaucrats and elected politicians and NGO activists using a formula agreed upon by “equity” experts from a monthly analysis of the “lived experience” of ordinary workers.
Former Attorney General Eric Holder said Tuesday on CNN’s “The Lead” that if he were the Attorney General, he would proceed with pursuing an indictment against former President Donald Trump based on what was public knowledge.
Guest-anchor Dana Bash said, “There’s a national conversation about the former president. And I know you were opposed to indicting a former president in the past. In the case of Donald Trump, however, you say that you no longer believe it’s unthinkable. Explain why.”
Holder said, “Yeah, I think given the breadth of what we already know, the depth of the criminality that we already know, and what I undoubtedly think we’re going to get from the January 6th Committee, and the danger to the republic, there was an attempt to stop the peaceful transfer of power, it seems to me there has to be accountability for that. Just as importantly, there has to be deterrence so people in the future will not try to do that which they tried to accomplish on January 6th. And that has really kind of moved me from thinking, it will be a divisive thing if it happens, but it will be equally divisive, I think, not to take action against those who tried to foment that coup.”
Bash said, “You do believe that there is a chance that the current attorney general, Merrick Garland, will indict Donald Trump, despite how divisive you acknowledge it could be?”
Holder said, “I think that possibility exists. I have great faith in Merrick Garland.”
Bash asked, “Would you do that if you were attorney general now?”
Holder said, “Well, I don’t have access to all of the information.”
Bash interjected, “From public record.”
Holder said, “Right, to the extent that I was satisfied that the statutory requirements were met and that you could show the necessary intent, given the nature of this crime, yeah, I would proceed.”
Shortly after Donald Trump was elected in November 2016, Obama’s deep state went after General Michael Flynn, whom Trump had named as his National Security advisor. After falsely accusing him of colluding with the Russians, the DOJ prosecuted him for lying to the FBI (and threatened his son) and, when that case collapsed, the judge refused to allow the DOJ to dismiss the case. Even though he was vindicated, the legal process impoverished Flynn. You’d think that, with his honorable career and his finances destroyed, that would have been enough for the left, but it wasn’t. Now, Biden’s Department of Defense is trying to force Flynn to return speaking fees from 2015.
Just the News has the story, which it sums up as follows:
The Biden Pentagon recently alerted retired Army Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn it plans to recoup from him nearly $40,000 he received for attending a dinner in Moscow in 2015, claiming he didn't clear the speaking fee in advance and therefore violated the Constitution's Emoluments Clause. But documents from Russia special prosecutor Robert Mueller's investigation tell a far different story.
The documents, reviewed by Just the News, show Flynn in fact alerted his former agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, ahead of the dinner and got approval to use the trip to spy on Russia's leadership and specifically its GRU military intelligence unit.
The operation was blessed in advance by senior DIA officials, including Vincent Stewart, the Marine general who had succeeded Flynn as DIA chief. The former Trump administration national security adviser was even given tasking orders and a counterintelligence briefing before he departed for Moscow in December 2015.
You can read the details here, including the fact that Flynn was officially debriefed after the speaking gig.
Leftists—and today’s Democrats are hard leftists—don’t limit themselves to the traditional American practice of voting politicians out of office and making them take their top officials with them. Instead, in true Stalinist fashion, when leftists have forced someone out of politics, whether the person was elected or appointed, they continue to do whatever it takes to destroy the person, ensuring that he can never rise up in politics again.
We see the same thing in the Marc Elias-inspired effort to use the Disqualification Clause in Article 3 of the 14th Amendment as a legal vehicle by which to prevent popular Republican politicians, such as Donald Trump, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Madison Cawthorne, Paul Gosar, and Andy Biggs, from even appearing on the ballots. It’s an obviously bogus assertion, since (a) the clause was manifestly intended to address people who had served the Confederacy in a four-year-long war that left 600,000 Americans dead, and (b) the clause was repealed when two-thirds of the House, in 1872, enacted the Amnesty Act.
Niceties such as the law and decencies such as not kicking a man when he’s down are foreign to leftists. If a Republican is down (or could be brought down), Democrats willingly abuse the law and then kick him as hard as they can to keep him from ever returning to politics or even having a decent life outside of politics. Meanwhile, on the Democrat side of the aisle, people who have been proven to engage in heinous, corrupt, illegal, and/or debauched behavior get book deals (all of them), million dollar art shows (Hunter Biden), and well-paid television gigs (most of them).
On August 20, 2020, Joe Biden accepted the Democrat party’s nomination for president by fatuously declaring, “Character and decency are on the ballot.” Thus, directly proclaiming himself and the Democrat party as the paragons of character and decency as compared to the “vile” Donald Trump and the “racialist” Make America Great Again movement.
A claim which is an unfathomable stretch of the imagination, considering Joe Biden’s long and well-known history of corruption and his uncontrollable penchant for being a serial fabulist and compulsive liar. To run on this platform required not onlyunbridled audacity but also lockstep conformity in the regime media’s coverage of Biden but also a requisite redefinition of character and decency by the entirety of the ruling class.
Wallowing in their ever-growing abandonment of integrity, the regime media and the rest of the ruling elites were well aware of Biden’s history of duplicity and dishonesty as well as his current mental deficiencies. Nonetheless, they rallied around a common cause and swung into action by transforming corruption into propriety, mendacity into guilelessness, and arrogance into humility. Thus, “Lunch Bucket Joe” was the epitome of “character and decency” who would single-handedly restore America.
It was not only the Democrat elites in lockstep with this deception and mythical mantra but virtually everyone in the Republican wing of the ruling class as well, including media figures such as Bill Kristol and George Will and their compatriot and fellow neo-conservative at The New York Times, David Brooks.
In August of 2019, Brooks, in an interview about Joe Biden’s obvious mental decline and penchant for fabrication, claimed that Joe “is not mendacious, he is not irresponsible. He may embellish a story to improve its dramatic effect. Our memories are just more fallible than we think.”
This is the same David Brooks who in 2015 published a self-serving book titled: The Road to Character, wherein he claimed character starts with having a certain set of universal traits that include a code of ethics -- an inner knowledge of what is fair and just. Further, character begins with and flourishes when “we move beyond our own self-interest and act for the greater good, whether it’s for the good of our family, our community, our workplace or our country.” [Emphasis added]
What happened to the David Brooks who wrote those sentiments and his fellow travelers in the ruling class? They fawned over his book while enthusiastically nodding in agreement. They pride themselves on attending seminars on the significance of character and wax endlessly about the importance of electing virtuous leaders.
Apparently, much of this is for public consumption. In reality, these elitists believe that they are not only the fountainhead but the arbiters of “character” as, not coincidentally, those they deem to be of character are invariably the “noble,” wealthy, and “higher ups.” In other words, their fellow elitists. They consider character as malleable as long as it accommodates their avarice and desire for societal control. Don’t the ruling elites have enough privileges without claiming good character for themselves?
It was this elitist mindset that allowed virtually the entirety of the ruling class to ignore the long-term welfare of the country as they determined that it was in their best interest to unabashedly promote the most corrupt, senescent, and inept presidential nominee in American history. The need to eliminate the threat to their financial and societal hegemony, Donald Trump and the MAGA movement, was far more important.
Wallowing in this egocentric mindset, these same myopic buffoons knew there was a high probability that the radical left would control the Biden administration due to Joe Biden’s mental incapacity and willingness to do or say anything as well as being, due to his decades of venality, an easy mark for domestic and foreign extortion. Nonetheless, they chose to continue their self-serving deification of Joe Biden.
That probability is now a reality as the Biden Administration has unabashedly promoted the entirety of the radical left’s socialist/Marxist agenda including unfettered illegal immigration, de facto infanticide, and the mainstreaming of gender dysphoria. Further, Biden has refused to condemn or prosecute their militant tactics whenever they choose to physically confront and intimidate judges, members of Congress, corporations, or the average citizen.
This mindset also played a major role in the ruling elite’s justification for covering up the damning contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop, the casting of the protests on January 6, 2021, as an “insurrection,” initiating as well as participating in unprecedented vote manipulation in 2020, and unabashedly claiming the 2020 election was honest and devoid of fraud.
Perhaps the most significant end-product of this mindset is the abject disdain for the non-elitist segment of the American citizenry, the vast majority of whom are endowed with considerably more sagacity and integrity than virtually any member of the current ruling class.
Perhaps no one has better captured their hypocrisy and duplicity than Joseph Heller in his ground-breaking novel Catch-22 when he wrote:
It was miraculous. It was almost no trick at all, he saw, to turn vice into virtue and slander into truth, impotence into abstinence, arrogance into humility, plunder into philanthropy, thievery into honor, blasphemy into wisdom, brutality into patriotism and sadism into justice. Anybody could do it; it required no brains at all. It merely required no character.
By inflicting Joe Biden upon the nation, the treachery, hypocrisy, avarice, and maleducation of the ruling elites have been exposed despite their concocted and narcissistic claim that they are the embodiment and final arbiter of character.
Thanks to their insufferable hubris, the bulk of the American people know who is solely responsible for the ongoing economic chaos and societal upheaval in the United States as well as much of the turmoil throughout the world.
Panic is thus setting in at the enclaves of the ruling class as they know their days atop the pyramid that is American society are coming to an end.
This was not because of difficulties in securing indictments or convictions. On the contrary, Attorney General Eric Holder told a Senate committee in March of 2013 that the Obama administration chose not to prosecute the big banks or their CEOs because to do so might “have a negative impact on the national economy.”
“Attorney General Eric Holder's tenure was a low point even within the disgraceful scandal-ridden Obama years.” DANIEL GREENFIELD / FRONTPAGE MAG
“Judicial Watch’s records request is designed to expose how California state legislators are wasting tax dollars to take care of another corrupt politician – Eric Holder – under the guise of resisting the rule of law on immigration and other matters,” stated Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton. “His record at the Clinton and Obama Justice Departments demonstrates a willingness to bend the law in order to protect his political patrons.”
OPERATION OBOMB: Barack Obama, Eric Holder and their bankster paymasters plan coup.
Barack Obama was famous not wanting to leave office when his term was done and well known for projecting a sense of entitlement to power.
“Obama’s new home in Washington has been described as the “nerve center” of the anti-Trump opposition. Former attorney general Eric Holder has said that Obama is “ready to roll” and has aligned himself with the “resistance.” Former high-level Obama campaign staffers now work with a variety of groups organizing direct action against Trump’s initiatives. “Resistance School,” for example, features lectures by former campaign executive Sara El-Amine, author of the Obama Organizing.”
FOR THE BANKSTERS…. Along with Eric Holder. Interesting that they are all LAWYERS!
During his presidency, Obama bragged that his administration was “the only thing between [Wall Street] and the pitchforks.” AND NONE WENT TO PRISON… JUST FOLLOW THE MONEY.
In fact, Obama handed the robber barons and outright criminals responsible for the 2008–09 financial crisis a multi-trillion-dollar bailout. His administration oversaw the largest redistribution of wealth in history from the bottom to the top one percent, spearheading the attack on the living standards of teachers and autoworkers.
This was not because of difficulties in securing indictments or convictions. On the contrary, Attorney General Eric Holder told a Senate committee in March of 2013 that the Obama administration chose not to prosecute the big banks or their CEOs because to do so might “have a negative impact on the national economy.”
The President and his top economic advisers bought the “too big to fail” concept, the notion that regardless of how profligate, irresponsible, even criminal, heads of the leading financial institutions in America had been, it would be worse for the nation if those institutions were to collapse. Consequently, while pushing a legislative agenda of public bail-outs, the Obama Administration maintained a secret program of multi-trillion dollar loans, including billions at below market interest rates. The principal recipients of the funding were JPMorgan, Bank of America, Citigroup Inc., Wells Fargo & Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley.
Practically every cabinet appointee of Obama’s has close personal connections to the ruling class, many having come directly from corporate boardrooms. Under Obama’s watch not a single executive at a major financial firm has been criminally tried, much less sent to jail, for their role in the financial crisis.
“Attorney General Eric Holder's tenure was a low point even within the disgraceful scandal-ridden Obama years.” DANIEL GREENFIELD / FRONTPAGE MAG
Trump criticized Dimon (Obama’s fave bankster donor) in 2013 for supposedly contributing to the country’s economic downturn. “I’m not Jamie Dimon, who pays $13 billion to settle a case and then pays $11 billion to settle a case and who I think is the worst banker in the United States,” he told reporters.
“Records show that four out of Obama's top five contributors are employees of financial industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase ($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054).”
JPMorgan’s investment arm, which includes its energy group, collects $14 billion annually; in comparison, six months’ worth of fines would amount to a paltry $180 million.
The new financial disclosures reveal that top Obama advisors directly involved in setting these policies have received millions from Wall Street firms, including those that have received huge taxpayer bailouts.
He is rather typical of the Wall Street insiders who comprise a cabinet and White House team that is filled with multi-millionaires, presided over by a president who parlayed his own political career into a multi-million-dollar fortune.
Fmr AG Holder: Trump ‘Has to Be Held Accountable’ for January 6 Riot
On Sunday, former Obama administration Attorney General Eric Holder called for former President Donald Trump to “be held accountable” for the January 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol.
CBS “Face the Nation” host Margaret Brennan asked Holder if he thought current Attorney General Merrick Garland was being aggressive enough in prosecuting riot participants and Trump.
“No one knows,” Holder replied. “I mean, you know, I have great faith in Merrick and in the people at the Justice Department. We won’t really know how aggressive they have been until they are before a camera and announcing a decision, either to indict certain people or not indict certain people.”
“And here’s my prediction, at some point, people at the Justice Department, perhaps that prosecutor in Atlanta, are going to have to make a determination about whether or not they want to indict Donald Trump,” he added.
Brennan asked, “Would you do it?
“Well, I think there’s going to be sufficient factual information. And I think that there’s going to be sufficient proof of intent,” Holder said.
He continued, “And then the question becomes, what’s the impact of such an indictment. I’m an institutionalist. My initial thought was not to indict the former president out of concern of … how divisive it would be. But given what we have learned, I think that he probably has to be held accountable.”