Biden Clearly Wants Civil War. Don't Take the Bait.
What we should give him instead.
Did you watch President Joe Biden's disgraceful speech on Thursday night? I did. And I know the Biden plan.
Although it's not Biden's plan. I think Biden is a puppet with dementia and diapers. Biden doesn't know whether Jill Biden is his wife or sister. Biden looks like a walking cadaver who reads whatever script is put in front of him. Then Jill leads him offstage, so he doesn't get lost. His handlers take him in back, pat him on the head, hand-feed him his baby food and change his diapers. Then it's time to "put a lid" on Biden's day. It's time for a nappy-nap.
So, none of this is Biden. So-called former President Barack Obama is the real president.
This is his delayed third term, and Obama is back to finish the job he started: the destruction of America, American exceptionalism, the great American middle class and capitalism.
But Obama isn't the real order-giver, either. He's just an order-taker. Obama carries out the orders he gets from the real psychopathic tyrants who control America: George Soros, Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum, Bill Gates and the Chinese Communist Party. China actually is the big dog. China gives the orders. China runs the show.
And it's clear what they want. That speech given by Biden was intended to incite civil war in America. Biden and his communist comrades want violence and a badly divided nation. They're daring us to start a civil war.
You know — exactly like all the BLM and antifa events of 2020.
They want us to do exactly what they already did. Riots, looting, torching, robbing, murder, attacks on police, billions in damage, thousands of businesses destroyed — but with the media's protection, it was all forgotten.
They want conservative patriots to do the same — except this time, their business partners in the media will make us into "America's Most Wanted." They'll call us Nazis, fascists, extremists, traitors, domestic terrorists and insurrectionists. Oh, wait: Biden already called us all of that in his speech — before we've ever done a thing. Can you imagine what they'd say if we actually committed violence?
That's the trap.
What's their plan? Have you seen the polls? Biden and his Democrat Congress are headed for terrible losses. Maybe even historical losses. They are despised by the working class and middle class of America. Even abortion didn't change the narrative. And no, Democrats aren't going to hold the Senate. Sen. Marco Rubio, J.D. Vance, Dr. Mehmet Oz, Herschel Walker and Adam Laxalt are within the margin of error and will almost certainly pull it out by election day.
Biden and his comrades desperately want to hold onto power. I believe their goal is threefold...
No. 1: Incite full-scale revolution or civil war, so they can declare martial law and suspend the midterms. Voila — they stay in power.
No. 2: Failing that, they want enough violence to instill fear and force most voters to stay home and vote via mail-in ballots. With no voter ID or signature match, the Democrats can successfully rig the election and stay in power.
No. 3: Or at the very least, they hope any violent act by conservative patriots will turn the voters against the GOP. They want you distracted, to forget the terrible damage Biden has inflicted on the U.S. economy and forget the issues that matter: inflation, sky-high gas and energy prices, sky-high grocery prices and the death of the middle class.
Democrats are going to lose badly if voters keep their eye on the ball. But if they are distracted; if they're turned against the "violent" Trump "America First" agenda; if they suddenly sympathize with "poor Biden" and Democrats as "victims" of violence; if they fear civil war and insurrection by Republicans; suddenly everything changes.
Lastly, if the Democrats can incite civil war, they have the perfect excuse to send the military door to door to confiscate our weapons and arrest conservative leaders who they'll claim "incited violence and insurrection."
Without the fear of an armed citizenry, we're just another Australia. After that, they'll mask us, force-vaccinate us and lock us down forever. Until every small business is out of business. Until we are all living in poverty and misery. Until they have total control over our lives.
Then, the communist attack has succeeded. America is finished. The American Dream is dead. America is owned by China. We are all serfs and slaves.
That's the Democrat plan. Or more accurately, that's China's plan.
Yes, it's clear Biden and his handlers want civil war. Let's not take the bait. Let's not fall for the trap. They want civil war, but let's give them civil disobedience. Then let's destroy them on Election Day.
A Lawsuit Exposes the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Lies
The SPLC “shows reckless disregard for the truth and does not appear to perform any fact finding at all”.
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.
Twenty-one years ago, Dustin Inman, a sixteen year old boy, lost his life to a Mexican illegal alien. That alien is still a wanted fugitive. Under the Trump administration, the ICE VOICE office was established to help victims of illegal aliens and Dustin’s killer appear on its most wanted list. In one of his numerous acts of calculated cruelty, Biden shut down ICE VOICE.
And two decades later Dustin’s killer is still out there.
There are tragically a thousand cases like this. But some of them make people step up. That’s how D.A. King founded the Dustin Inman Society. The former Marine financed it with his life savings, borrowed against his house and sold his inheritance. Since then he has fought a tireless campaign in Georgia against an illegal alien crisis that only keeps getting worse.
And now he’s fighting one against the Southern Poverty Law Center.
A decade ago the Southern Poverty Law Center called him a “nativist”, but admitted the Dustin Inman Society wasn’t a hate group. “Because he is fighting, working on his legislation through the political process, that is not something we can quibble with, whether we like the law or not," Heidi Beirich, the woman behind the SPLC's infamous hate labeling, conceded.
Now, the SPLC lists the Dustin Inman Society and D.A. King as an "anti-immigrant hate group" because he favors enforcing the nation's laws. King responded by suing the SPLC.
D.A. King's adopted sister is Korean. The board of the Dustin Inman Society includes black and Hispanic, as well as immigrant, board members. The SPLC chose to disregard all of that by smearing the organization as a bigoted hate group anyway.
The complaint notes the past history of violent assaults triggered by SPLC hate group designations and hate map listings including the Family Resource Council terrorist attack. The complaint demonstrates the sloppiness that the SPLC is known for by listing a series of basic factual errors about the year when the Dustin Inman Society was incorporated, where King was employed and what year he got involved in activism against the illegal alien crisis.
"These admissions taken together show that Defendant SPLC not only fails to investigate or have expertise at all on groups it monitors but instead shows reckless disregard for the truth and does not appear to perform any fact finding at all," the complaint charges.
The Southern Poverty Law Center either knew that the Dustin Inman Society "did not meet its own definition of 'hate group' and maliciously published the designation anyway or was so grossly incompetent and reckless as to be malicious in publishing the designation without doing any due dillegence as they repeatedly hold out to the public."
The SPLC's response essentially acknowledged that its hate group labels are a matter of opinion and cited a previous judicial ruling arguing that King had failed to allege facts "plausibly demonstrating, by clear and convincing evidence, that SPLC subjectively knew that its characterization of DIS was false."
You can’t prove we’re lying on purpose.
The Southern Poverty Law Center wants its smears to be treated as facts. And companies fire people, Big Tech monopolies deplatform organizations, including the David Horowitz Freedom Center, based on those smears. The SPLC provides training to law enforcement and politicians use its lists as a basis for government action. Guidestar, a non-profit information source, at one point added SPLC 'flags' on organizations that it had listed as hate groups. That goes beyond merely offering "opinions". And yet when cornered, the SPLC’s lawyers counter that it’s just offering “constitutionally protected opinions” no different than any pundit.
The SPLC legal filing contends that, "nor does it matter whether SPLC keeps track of and publicizes how many organizations it has designated as hate groups. This does not somehow mean that any of the individual hate group designations themselves are factual."
So much for what the Washington Post had described as ”a golden seal of disapproval, considered nonpartisan enough to be heeded by government agencies, police departments, corporations and journalists.”
Even mainstream media coverage at Politico and other outlets had reported on the SPLC's casual disregard for the facts, baselessly putting entire towns on its “hate map”. Front Page Magazine has had its own brushes with the leftist hate group and knows how little in the way of anything factual is involved in the Southern Poverty Law Center’s listings.
At one point, the Southern Poverty Law Center had listed my single author blog as one of its “Active Anti-Muslim Hate Groups" alongside “Casa D’Ice Signs,” the signs on a bar located on K-Mart Plaza in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. In one year it claimed that the “number of anti-Muslim hate groups increased almost three-fold" by counting Act for America as one group in one year and then counting all of its chapters separately the next year.
As sleazy and dishonest as you think the SPLC might be, it’s actually much worse.
There’s no question that the SPLC’s listings are comprehensive. They included, at one point, Ben Carson, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz’s father, and the African-American former Secretary of State of Ohio. The SPLC attacked former Homicide star Richard Belzer who was unhappy to be implicitly associated with Nazis. “As a Jewish person whose grandfather represented Israel at the United Nations before it was a state and an uncle, who as a member of the Resistance, fought the Nazis in World War Two, I am deeply hurt and offended,” he wrote.
Last year, the SPLC announced that it would stop monitoring black racial separatist groups because “black separatism was born out of valid anger against very real historical and systemic oppression” and the SPLC was adopting "an understanding of racism grounded in nuance and the realities of racial power dynamics." What that meant was that black racism wasn’t racist.
Under these circumstances, it’s understandable that the SPLC isn’t even pretending that its smears have anything to do with the facts. At least not in a court of law. To its leftist donors, to law enforcement and corporations, the SPLC claims to be providing expert analysis and facts. But when sued over those same claims and the numerous sloppy errors that show no serious investigation ever took place, suddenly the SPLC’s opinion is no different than yours.
Except that it’s not.
A few years ago the House Democrat majority on the Ways and Means Committee presented a list of "hate groups" that it wanted to see lose their tax exempt status. The Democrat IRS hit list seemed to overlap with a list assembled by the SPLC and curated by Philanthropy Magazine. It included the David Horowitz Freedom Center, the American College of Pediatricians, the Center for Security Policy, the Family Research Council, and many others.
When government officials are using your list to target organizations, that’s not just an opinion.
D.A. King knows something about that. The Dustin Inman Society was never able to receive true non-profit status. Instead it’s been forced to operate as a 501(c)(4). Taking on the SPLC is another way of trying to even the score. Two decades later, illegal migration, like so many of the other crises that the organizations targeted the SPLC were created to fight, have grown worse. And so has the suppression of the political opposition. King has spent nearly a generation fighting an endless fight against open borders. And open borders is what the SPLC wants.
“With the full knowledge that we are a coalition made up of Americans of diverse descriptions – including proud immigrants – the SPLC has repeatedly spread false and libelous accusations that DIS is somehow an “anti-immigrant hate group,” D.A. King stated. “While we educate Georgians on the need for state legislation aimed at deterring the organized crime of illegal immigration in Georgia, the SPLC has worked against passage of such measures as anti-enforcement lobbyists in the Georgia Capitol.”
The SPLC's Immigrant Justice Project claims that "Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers have illegally and unfairly apprehended immigrants with disregard for their rights." Even while the SPLC fights for illegal aliens, it also uses its false claims of expertise to denounce those who disagree and arranges to have them blacklisted and subjected to government action.
That’s not debate. Nor is it an opinion. It’s political repression.
NEARLY HALF OF ALL 'CHEAP' LABOR FARM WORKERS END UP ON WELFARE IN MEXIFORNIA!
He continued, saying “In that time, the Biden administration has blamed an unprecedented surge of illegal immigration on all sorts of external factors, except their own sabotage of our nation’s immigration laws.” SPENCER LINDQUIST
Dems give illegals welfare, taxpayer-funded health care, in-state tuition and protect them from deportation through sanctuary laws. In return, the illegals vote for Dem and the ballot measures the want. The illegals function as the Dem imported electoral college, canceling the vote of legitimate citizens and legal immigrants, blocking reform and keeping Dems in power. Maybe that is what Michael Bloomberg had in mind when he called California “a great example for the rest of this country.”
LLOYD BILLINGSLEY
It is the single most dangerous piece of legislation before Congress. What I call H.R.1 is the ‘Corrupt Politicians Act.’ […] It’s the number one bill. It’s not about COVID; it’s not about vaccinations; it’s not about getting people back to work; it’s not about getting kids back to school. It is about ensuring that Democrats remain in power and control for the next 100 years. It is a radical bill. What does it do? It federalizes all elections. It strikes down every election reform protection at the state level. So photo ID laws — right now in a lot of states you’ve got to use photo ID to vote — ‘The Corrupt Politician Act’ strikes that down. It sets up automatic voter registration, which would result in millions of illegal immigrants, and criminals, and felons being able to vote. The Democrats believe if illegal immigrants and felons are voting, that benefits the Democrats and keeps them in power. Not only that, it mandates universal mail-in balloting, it mandates ballot harvesting. This is all designed to facilitate fraud. SEAN MORAN
Newsom Opposes Vote-by-Mail for Farm Workers; ‘Privately Seething’ over Biden Support
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) is again under fire from members of his own party, this time President Joe Biden, over his hesitancy to sign a bill that would encourage California farmworkers to unionize.
California Assembly Bill 2183 would make it easier for farmworkers to unionize and allow them to vote by mail in union elections. Biden is just the latest Democrat politician putting pressure on Newsom to sign the bill.
Biden said he “strongly” supports the farmworker bill in a brief statement issued just before Labor Day.
“In the state with the largest population of farmworkers, the least we owe them is an easier path to make a free and fair choice to organize a union,” Biden said.
“Government should work to remove – not erect – barriers to workers organizing,” the president added.
However, Newsom vetoed a similar bill last year, and farmworker activists fear AB 2183 will suffer the same fate after Newsom sent the bill back to the California legislature less than two weeks ago.
Newsom’s office is on record saying they “cannot support an untested mail-in election process that lacks critical provisions to protect the integrity of the election, and is predicated on an assumption that government cannot effectively enforce laws.”
The California legislature sent a revised version of the bill to Newsom’s desk for his signature, but it is uncertain whether he will veto it.
Newsom is “privately seething” over Biden’s endorsement of the bill, multiple people with knowledge of Newsom’s thinking told Politico.
Workers pick squash at Manassero Farms in Irvine, CA on Friday, August 12, 2022. The family run business is celebrating its 100th anniversary. ( Paul Bersebach/MediaNews Group/Orange County Register via Getty Images)
Biden’s endorsement of AB 2183 came after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) publicly urged Newsom to sign the bill.
“CA farmworkers provide for our families — but far too many can’t provide for theirs because they are exploited and don’t have a voice on the job,” Pelosi tweeted. “We can mend this injustice by expanding workers’ rights. I urge the governor to sign #AB2183 for the farmworkers and For The Children.”
Vice President Kamala Harris added pressure on Newsom, saying it is “long past due” for California to enact this legislation.
Of California’s 800,000 farmworkers, less than one percent are unionized, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Further, more than 70 percent of California’s farmworkers are undocumented immigrants.
Although large unions like the United Farm Workers want Newsom to sign the legislation, farmers and business groups, including the California Chamber of Commerce, are opposed to the bill.
“It essentially amounts to a forced union submission, because even the mail-in voting provision allows the labor organization representative to fill out the ballot,” Western Growers vice president of state government affairs Matthew Allen told Politico. “It’s really quite simple what the bill is doing. It’s eliminating a farmworker’s right to the secret-ballot election.”
Jordan Dixon-Hamilton is a reporter for Breitbart News. Write to him at jdixonhamilton@breitbart.com or follow him on Twitter.
No comments:
Post a Comment