NAFTA JOE BIDEN'S BORDER TSARINA GAMER LAWYER KAMALA HARRIS WELCOMES AT HER DOOR ILLEGALS WITH COOKIES AND VOTER REGISTRATION CARDS - Watch: Migrants Arrive on Buses to VP Kamala Harris’s D.C. House from Texas

 

Watch: Migrants Arrive on Buses to VP Kamala Harris’s D.C. House from Texas

Kent Nishimura/Los Angeles Times/STEFANI REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images

JOHN BINDER

6 Oct 20220

1:56

Another busload of border crossers and illegal aliens, sent from Texas by Gov. Greg Abbott (R), arrived at Vice President Kamala Harris’s residence in Washington, DC, on Thursday.

As part of Abbott’s operation to bus border crossers and illegal aliens out of Texas to sanctuary cities, he sent another migrant bus to Harris’s residence, the Naval Observatory, this week.

Most of those arriving, according to reports, arrived at the United States-Mexico border from Venezuela and Ecuador in the hopes of being released into the U.S. interior as part of President Joe Biden’s expansive Catch and Release network.

The latest bus of nearly 40 border crossers and illegal aliens comes about a month after Abbott sent an initial migrant bus to Harris’s D.C. residence. The vice president did not greet the new arrivals.

In addition, the migrant buses continuing to arrive in D.C. from Texas and Arizona are against the backdrop of the Democrat-controlled D.C. City Council advancing a plan that will give voting rights to newly arrived foreign nationals — including illegal aliens and temporary visa holders.

From February 2021 to August 2022, the Biden administration has released at least 1.35 million border crossers and illegal aliens into American communities, working directly with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that help bus and fly arrivals across the U.S. interior, often free of charge.

Another roughly one million illegal aliens have successfully crossed the U.S.-Mexico border, since Biden took office, undetected by Border Patrol.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here. 

Data: Foreign-Born Voting Population Rises in 75% of Swing States Since 2016

ALEX KENT/AFP via Getty Images

JOHN BINDER

5 Oct 20220

8:41

Mass immigration to the United States has pushed up the number of foreign-born voters across 75 percent of the nation’s critical swing states since 2016, new data shows.

The data, published by the American Immigration Council, reveals the extent to which ongoing mass immigration levels are dramatically changing the demographic makeup of the American electorate.

In nine of 12 swing states, for instance, the foreign-born voting population has risen over the last six years. Most prominently, Florida, Michigan, Texas, and Arizona have seen the largest jumps in foreign-born voters over that time.

Foreign-born voters in Florida, for instance, now account for more than 17 percent of the state’s electorate. In Texas, more than 11 percent of the state’s electorate are foreign-born voters and in Arizona, the foreign-born voting population accounts for 10.5 percent of the electorate.

“In swing states where close races are expected to take place, the extent to which changing electorates can be activated by each campaign may ultimately help determine who wins and loses come November,” American Immigration Council researchers suggest of the impact on this year’s midterm elections.

Below is a breakdown of the foreign-born voter data by swing state:

Arizona

• Share of eligible foreign-born voters: 10.5 percent or about 535,000 voters
• Increase in share of eligible foreign-born voters from 2016 to 2022: +1.7 percent
• Margin of victory in 2016: 3.5 percent
• Margin of victory in 2020: 0.3 percent

Colorado

• Share of eligible foreign-born voters: 5.7 percent or about 239,000 voters
• Increase in share of eligible foreign-born voters from 2016 to 2022: +0.4 percent
• Margin of victory in 2016: 4.9 percent
• Margin of victory in 2020: 13.5 percent

Florida

• Share of eligible foreign-born voters: 17.1 percent or about 2,651,000 voters
• Increase in share of eligible foreign-born voters from 2016 to 2022: +2.1 percent
• Margin of victory in 2016: 1.2 percent
• Margin of victory in 2020: 3.4 percent

Georgia

• Share of eligible foreign-born voters: 6.8 percent or about 515,000 voters
• Increase in share of eligible foreign-born voters from 2016 to 2022: +1.4 percent
• Margin of victory in 2016: 5.1 percent
• Margin of victory in 2020: 0.2 percent

Iowa

• Share of eligible foreign-born voters: 2.4 percent or about 57,000 voters
• Decrease in share of eligible foreign-born voters from 2016 to 2022: -0.6 percent
• Margin of victory in 2016: 9.4 percent
• Margin of victory in 2020: 8.2 percent

Maine

• Share of eligible foreign-born voters: 2.4 percent or about 26,000 voters
• Increase in share of eligible foreign-born voters from 2016 to 2022: +0.0 percent
• Margin of victory in 2016: 3.0 percent
• Margin of victory in 2020: 9.1 percent

Michigan

• Share of eligible foreign-born voters: 5.8 percent or about 438,000 voters
• Increase in share of eligible foreign-born voters from 2016 to 2022: +2.2 percent
• Margin of victory in 2016: 0.2 percent
• Margin of victory in 2020: 2.8 percent

North Carolina

• Share of eligible foreign-born voters: 4.5 percent or about 342,000 voters
• Increase in share of eligible foreign-born voters from 2016 to 2022: +0.0 percent
• Margin of victory in 2016: 3.7 percent
• Margin of victory in 2020: 1.4 percent

Ohio

• Share of eligible foreign-born voters: 3.8 percent or about 330,000 voters
• Increase in share of eligible foreign-born voters from 2016 to 2022: +1.3 percent
• Margin of victory in 2016: 8.1 percent
• Margin of victory in 2020: 8.0 percent

Pennsylvania

• Share of eligible foreign-born voters: 5.1 percent or about 493,000 voters
• Increase in share of eligible foreign-born voters from 2016 to 2022: +0.3 percent
• Margin of victory in 2016: 0.7 percent
• Margin of victory in 2020: 1.2 percent

Texas

• Share of eligible foreign-born voters: 11.1 percent or about 2,096,000 voters
• Increase in share of eligible foreign-born voters from 2016 to 2022: +1.9 percent
• Margin of victory in 2016: 9.0 percent
• Margin of victory in 2020: 5.6 percent

Wisconsin

• Share of eligible foreign-born voters: 3.1 percent or about 135,000 voters
• Increase in share of eligible foreign-born voters from 2016 to 2022: +0.1 percent
• Margin of victory in 2016: 0.8 percent
• Margin of victory in 2020: 0.6 percent

Screenshot via American Immigration Council

Screenshot via American Immigration Council

President Joe Biden, last week, praised mass immigration and the resulting demographic changes as spurring “so much opportunity to make this country so much better.”

The data comes as Biden has spiked the number of foreign-born residents across a multitude of states and Democrats vow to add a million foreign-born voters to the nation’s voter rolls in the next four years.

Already, annually, the U.S. government rewards over a million foreign nationals with green cards and another more than a million with temporary work visas to take American jobs. In addition, under Biden, about 2.2 million illegal aliens have entered American communities.

Research and the establishment media have consistently admitted that the larger a region’s foreign-born population, the more likely that region is to vote for Democrats over Republicans.

Democrat Hillary Clinton, in the 2016 presidential election, dominated with foreign-born voters against former President Trump. CNN exit polls show 64 percent of voters born outside the U.S. went for Clinton while just 31 percent voted for Trump.

Conversely, Trump won among native-born Americans.

Screenshot via CNN

In 2019, The Atlantic‘s Ronald Brownstein found that nearly 90 percent of House congressional districts with a foreign-born population above the national average are won by Democrats. This means every congressional district with a foreign-born population exceeding 15 percent has a 90 percent chance of electing Democrats and only a ten percent chance of electing a Republican.

The Washington Post, the New York Times, the Atlantic, Axios, the Los Angeles Times, and the Wall Street Journal have all admitted that rapid demographic changes spurred by mass immigration are tilting the nation toward a permanent Democrat political majority.

“The single biggest threat to Republicans’ long-term viability is demographics,” Axios acknowledged in 2019. “The numbers simply do not lie … there’s not a single demographic megatrend that favors Republicans.”

Already, the U.S. has the most generous immigration system in the world — expected to bring in 15 million new foreign-born voters by 2042. About eight million of those voters will have arrived entirely due to the process known as “chain migration,” whereby newly naturalized citizens can bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the U.S.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.

Fed Economists: Inflation Eroding Most Americans’ Wage Gains

'The current time period is unparalleled in terms of the challenge employed workers face,' says Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

Getty Images

Reuters • October 4, 2022 5:00 pm

SHARE

By Michael S. Derby

NEW YORK (Reuters)—Americans' wages are losing ground to inflation at a steep rate, a report on Tuesday from the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas said, a finding that offers some support for the central bank's super-charged campaign to lower price pressures.

"Despite the stronger wage growth due to the tightness of the labor market, a majority of workers are finding their wages falling even further behind inflation," economists for the Dallas Fed wrote. A majority of workers' wages, once adjusted for inflation, "have failed to keep up with inflation in the past year. For these workers, the median decline in real wages is a little more than 8.5%."

The report acknowledged over the last 25 years there have been other periods of lost ground on wages relative to inflation, but added "the current time period is unparalleled in terms of the challenge employed workers face."

The paper said the average median decline in real wages over the last quarter century is 6.5%, with real wage declines typically ranging between 5.7% and 6.8%, highlighting the pain of the current period.

The report arrives as the U.S. central bank is pressing a historically aggressive campaign to raise rates. Since March, the Fed has lifted its overnight target rate range from near zero levels to the current 3% to 3.25% range, trying to lower the highest inflation rates in forty years.

According to central bank forecasts and the comments of officials, the Fed's efforts are far from finished. At its September policy meeting officials penciled in a year-ending funds rate of 4.4% and a 4.6% rate for next year.

The Fed has justified this as a necessary rebalancing of the economy. It has acknowledged that its effort to bring inflation down from the annualized 6.2% increase seen in August back to the 2% target will take time and will drive up unemployment.

On Monday, New York Fed president John Williams said that while the jobless rate will likely rise from 3.7% to around 4.5% next year, "history teaches us that price stability is essential to achieving maximum employment over the longer term."

Williams said high inflation hurts Americans unequally, adding "those who can least afford the essentials—like food, gas, and housing—suffer the most."

The Fed has faced criticism from some that its bid to lower inflation will cause too many job losses, and Fed Chair Jerome Powell himself has warned of likely economic pain.

On Tuesday in New York, San Francisco Fed leader Mary Daly said she believes there is room to bring better balance in the job market without sending that part of the economy into outright decline.

Daly acknowledged that wage earners were losing ground against surging inflation and noted that her bank is collecting evidence pointing to a moderation in wage gains.

She said she is seeing "a very different pace" for wage gains now, as some of the rapid churn seen during and after the most acute phase of the coronavirus pandemic has passed. She said big wage increases are giving way to much smaller gains or attempts to improve work conditions outside of pay.

The catch for the Fed is that with underlying levels of inflation having grown worse, wage earners could lose even more ground on their pay before prices are brought under control.

(Reporting by Michael S. Derby; Editing by David Gregorio)

After donating heavily to Barack Obama’s Senate and presidential races and pouring money into Hillary Clinton’s campaign, Soros spent even more to defeat Donald Trump in the 2020 election. He told the World Economic Forum that Trump’s America First agenda ran counter to the globalist project. While criticizing big money’s influence in politics, he injected $81 million (including $70 million of his own) through the Democracy PAC. Using the pandemic as an excuse, his funding vehicles sought to increase vote-by-mail, expanding opportunities for vote tampering and harvesting.

VIDEO

JOE BIDEN'S WAR ZONE

Jesse Watters Primetime 10/4/22 FULL HD | BREAKING FOX NEWS october 4, 2022

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVWC7ZUdQU8

Pelosi: Democrats Will Keep the House After November’s Midterms

15

0 seconds of 6 minutes, 8 secondsVolume 90%

PAM KEY

4 Oct 20220

1:15

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said Monday on CBS’s “The Late Show” that she believes Democrats will keep control of the House after the November midterm elections.

Colbert asked, “In 2018, when you were sitting right there in that chair, you came on here, and you predicted that the Democrats were going to pick up seats in the Congress on a large scale. They did. They picked up 40 seats in the House, a real wave. What is your prediction for the election that’s a little bit more than a month away? Madam Speaker, you have the floor.”

Pelosi said, “Well, I’m so glad you asked that question because I believe that we will win the — hold the House. We will hold the House by winning more seats. We won the 40 seats, then we lost some when Trump was on the ballot, we lost some of the Trump districts, but we held enough seats to hold the House with him on the ballot. He’s not on the ballot now.”

She added, “Did I say his name? I didn’t mean to.”

Colbert said, “We will have the videotapes fumigated.”

Pelosi said, “Perhaps you can bleep that out.”

Follow Pam Key on Twitter @pamkeyNEN

KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED: IS IT WORKING?

Roughly three million economic migrants have been allowed across the southern border into the U.S. economy since Biden’s inauguration. Roughly two million additional legal migrants, temporary workers, and white collar illegals have been allowed in via U.S. airports. The combined inflow is huge — roughly four million immigrant workers join the labor force each year.

“Obama would declare himself president for life with Soros really running the show, as he did for the entire Obama presidency.”

George Soros, the Obamas, Susan Rice, Valerie Jarrett, and many other wealthy, elite, no-borders, one-world Marxist climate zealots have an iron grip on the Democrat Party from bottom to top. Are the elites deliberately choosing weak people so as to control them from behind the curtain? We know they have done that with Biden, Kamala, and Fetterman. Is this their new modus operandi; choose the weak who will bow to the strong because the weak are more palatable to voters than the strong? M.B. MATHEWS