YEAH, JESUS WANTS UNBORN CHILDREN TO BE BUTCHERED ALIVE!
Biden Cites God in Predicting Defeat of Pro-Lifers: ‘We’re Going to See What Happens All Over America, God Willing’
(CNSNews.com) - President Joe Biden cited God in a speech he delivered on Tuesday night at the Howard Theatre in Washington, D.C.. warning that because of the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v. Wade, Americans will turn out for the November election to defeat pro-life Republicans.
“The Dobbs decision—the Court practically dares women to go ahead and lead and be heard,” said Biden.
“One of the most extraordinary parts of that decision, in my view, was when the majority wrote, quote, ‘Women are not without electoral…’ ‘Are not…’—excuse me—“…are not without electoral or political power.”
“Let me tell you something — [laughs]— the Court and the extreme Republicans who have spent decades trying to overturn Roe are about to find out,” said Biden.
“As they say in one of the towns I grew up, ‘They ain’t seen nothin’ yet,’” said Biden.
“Just take a look at what happened in Kansas,” he said.
“And come this November, we’re going to see what happens all over America, God willing,” said Biden.
Here is the full text of Biden’s speech:
Remarks by President Biden at a Political Event at the Howard Theatre
President Joe Biden: Well, folks, thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak to you. Look, Doc, thanks for that introduction.
And, you know, we’re only 22 days away from the most consequential election in our history, in my view — in recent history at least — elections where the choice and the stakes are crystal clear, especially when it comes to the right to choose.
And on January 22nd, 1973 — I hate to admit this, but I was a freshman — a 30-year-old freshman United States senator, and the Supreme Court issued its opinion on Roe v. Wade, establishing a fundamental constitutional right to choose.
Nearly 50 years later, on June 24th of this year, the Court issued the Dobbs decision. A woman — and all — all across the country, starting in my house, lost the fundamental right.
I want to remind us all how we felt that day when 50 years of constitutional precedent was overturned —
I’m going to use this mic if it’s okay.The anger, the worry, the disbelief, the unbelievable fact that for the first time in our history, the Supreme Court didn’t just fail to preserve a constitutional freedom, it actually took away the right that was so fundamental to Americans. It took away a right. And the fear that now that most personal decisions may not only be made by the woman and her doctor, but by politicians to make that decision.
The Dobbs decision — the Court practically dares women to go ahead and lead and be heard.
One of the most extraordinary parts of that decision, in my view, was when the majority wrote, quote, “Women are not without electoral…” “Are not…” — excuse me — “…are not without electoral or political power.”
Let me tell you something — (laughs) — the Court and the extreme Republicans who have spent decades trying to overturn Roe are about to find out. (Applause.)
As they say in one of the towns I grew up, “They ain’t seen nothin’ yet.”
Just take a look at what happened in Kansas. (Applause.) And come this November, we’re going to see what happens all over America, God willing.
You know, it’s only been four months since the Dobbs decision, but we’re no longer have to imagine the chaos and the heartache it’s causing.
In just four months, abortion bans have gone into effect in 16 states; 26.5 million women of reproductive age already live in states subject to these bans.
Today in America, there are women who have been turned away from emergency rooms while having miscarriages, losing wanted pregnancies, and told they need to wait until they’re sicker before they get the care they need. And there are survivors of rape and incest who’ve been denied access to health services in their home states and been forced to travel to states that do provide that care.
And there’s so much confusion and uncertainty that doctors and nurses fear they could face criminal charges for just doing their job responsibly.
Patients are being denied prescriptions that they’ve been taking for years for conditions like rheumatoid arthritis and oste- — osteoporosis, you know, because pharmacies are concerned that those drugs could also be used to terminate a pregnancy, so they’re not giving them their prescriptions.
That’s not all. I’ve warned about how this decision risks the broader right to privacy for everyone. There’s a thing called the Ninth Amendment. It says there’s a right to privacy. That’s how it was interpreted back then.
Well, guess what, folks? That’s because Roe recognized the fundamental right to privacy that has served as a basis for many more rights that are — were — were to come and to take — we’ve taken for granted of late. And they’re ingrained in the fabric of this country: the right to make a decision — the best decision for your health; the right to birth control — the right that I pushed hard and it finally got changed — the married couples in the privacy of their bedroom. Excuse me. The mar- — I’m thinking about the Dobbs — the Dobbs decision.Imagine — well, I’ll get to that in a second with Clarence Thomas. (Laughter.) But the right to marry who you love. (Applause.)
Look, folks, Justice Thomas said as much in his concurring opinion in Dobbs, writing, quote, “In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold…” — we’re getting to the whole idea of contraception — “…Lawrence and Obergefell.”
Look, folks, meanwhile — and I just want to make clear — I know you all know, but I’ll make sure — they’re talking about the right to use contraception and the right to marry who you love. I mean —
Anyway, I don’t want to get started. (Laughter.)
Meanwhile, congressional Republicans are doubling down on their extreme positions.
Kevin McCarthy, the Republican Leader of the House, has said that if they take control of the House, our work is, quote, “far from done.” He wants the United States Congress to pass a law that would ban abortion nationwide.
Senator —
Well —
Senator Lindsey Graham called for an abortion ban that criminalizes doctors and nurses who provide medical care for their patients in need.
If Republicans get their way with a national ban, it won’t matter where you live in America. So let me be very clear: If such a bill were to pass in the next several years, I’ll veto it. (Applause.) But we can’t let it pass in the first instance.
Immediately after the Dobbs decision came down, I signed an order and my administration took a number of actions to protect the access to reproductive healthcare, including emergency medical care; to protect a woman’s right to travel from a state that prohibits abortion to a state that allows it; and to protect the privacy of sensitive health information preserving — preventing states from tracking women who are seeking help, because that’s what some will do.
But as I said when the Dobbs decision — we’re fighting a battle in the courts as well. But as I’ve said in the Dobbs decision, when it was released, I want to repeat it again: The only sure way to stop these extremist laws that are — put in jeopardy women’s health and rights is for Congress to pass a law. (Applause.)
And I’ve said before: The Court got Roe right nearly 50 years ago, and I believe Congress should codify Roe once and for all. (Applause.)
Right now, we’re short a handful of votes. If you care about the right to choose, then you got to vote. That’s why, in these midterm elections, it’s so critical to elect more Democratic senators to the United States Senate and more Democrats to keep control of the House of Representatives. (Applause.)
And, folks, if we do that, here is the promise I make to you and the American people: The first bill that I will send to the Congress will be to codify Roe v. Wade. (Applause.) And when Congress passes it, I’ll sign it in January, 50 years after Roe was first decided the law of the land. (Applause.)
And together, we’ll restore the right to choose for every woman in every state in America. So, vote. You got to get out the vote. We can do this if we vote. (Applause.)
And, folks, I also have a message for the young people of this nation. I’ve always believed that this generation is — the young generation represents the best educated, most talented, least prejudiced generation in American history — (applause) — and that today we face an inflection point, one of those moments that only come around every several generations where there’s so much change happening — technologically, politically, and socially — that the decisions we make now are going to determine the future of our nation and the future of your generation for the next 30 or more years, and it only happens once every five, six generations.
I know that you may feel like it’s an added burden on top of all you’ve already been through and this young generation, my grandchildren and children, have been through.
I’m not saying you have to shoulder the burden alone. The task at hand and the task ahead is the work of all of us. What I am saying is you represent the best of us. Your generation will not be ignored, will not be shunned, and will not be silent. Just look at what happens when you speak out.
Two years ago, perhaps many of you voted for your first time in an election or volunteered for your — work in your first election. You understood the choices and the stakes. And because of your experience and power to vote, you elected me President and Kamala Vice President — the highest-ranking woman ever to be elected in American history. (Applause.)
And since then, with your help, we’ve delivered enormous progress for the nation — the most significant gun safety law in 30 years. (Applause.) And, by the way, if you give me a Democratic Congress, we’re going to ban assault weapons again. I did it once, I’ll do it again. (Applause.)
And the most significant Infrastructure Law in seven years. Have us — you know, we ranked up, like, in the 20s, in terms of infrastructure — the United States of America, for God’s sake.
We made the most significant commitment ever in all of history to protect our environment — ever, ever, ever — $360 billion. (Applause.)
And with your help, we’re forgiving student debt. (Applause.) By the way, we really worked hard to get the system right as to how you apply. Just since yesterday, 4 million more people applied. (Applause.)
I’m keeping my promise that no one should be in jail merely for using or possessing marijuana. You should not be in jail. (Applause.)
Together, making sure our democracy delivers for people, but we know there’s much more progress that needs to be made. And we know that there remains real options.
In 2020, you voted and delivered the change you wanted to see in the world. In 2022, you need to exercise your power to vote again for the future of our nation and the future of your generation.
So let me close with this. I’m asking the American people to remember how you felt — how you felt the day the extreme Dobbs decision came down and Roe was overturned after 50 years. And I’m asking you — and, by the way, it’s not just affecting your gener- — young generation. It’s affecting children, moms, grandmoms, grandpops, all — the entire generations all the way across the board.
And I remember asking — I want you to remember that the final say does not rest in the court now; it does not rest with extremist Republicans in Congress — and finally say — finally say, about your right to choose, that it rests with you. And if you do your part and vote for Democratic leaders in Congress, I promise you we’ll do our part. I’ll do my part.
And with your support, I’ll sign a law codifying Roe in January. (Applause.)
Together, let’s remember who we are. We are the United States of America, and there’s nothing beyond our capacity. (Applause.) So vote, vote, vote!
God bless you all. And may God protect our troops. Thank you.
I’m sorry — (music plays) —
I was apologizing for my back. (Music stops playing.) My mother would be very angry. I was talking with people with my back to them. I apologize. (Laughter.)
So, thank you all so very, very much.
Nolte: Democrat Solution to Everything Is Kill More Babies
“Rising Star” Stacey Abrams proved just how stupid she really is by trying to tie inflation to abortion.
While Democrats ridicule Georgia Republican U.S. Senate candidate Herschel Walker’s intelligence, Georgia’s most famous election denier, Stacey “President of Earth” Abrams, said this on MSNBC when she was asked about inflation:
Let’s be clear. Having children is why you’re worried about your price for gas. It’s why you’re concerned about how much food costs. For women this is not a reductive issue. You can’t divorce being forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy from the economic realities of having a child.
Let’s be clearer still. … You are a stupid, stupid woman…
We all know what she was trying to do here. Polls show Democrats are focused too much on abortion and too little on economic issues. Polls also show Republicans surging all across the country.
But.
Democrats know their hysterical base needs to hear about abortion, needs those sweet-sweet baby-killing hits that soothe their neuroses and self-hate…
So.
Governor-in-Her-Own-Mind Abrams thought she’d show off her second-to-none political acumen by tying the two issues together. Listen, morons, if we kill more babies, prices will go down, and you won’t have to buy as much stuff.
If Stacey Abrams were any dumber, she’d have to wear a helmet. After all, this is the same Stacey Abrams who said the fetal heartbeat was a manufactured sound.
But Stacey isn’t alone.
No matter the problem, Democrats have a solution, and it’s more baby killing. Here’s that rocket scientist we call Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen:
“I believe that eliminating the right of women to make decisions about whether to have children would have very damaging effects on the economy and would set women back decades,” she said.
Yeah, the problem isn’t Biden’s supply chain crisis or Biden’s energy crisis or flooding the country with millions of illegals; it’s the lack of access to baby killing.
Over at that think tank we call the HuffPo, they’re saying killing da’ babies will help reduce a deficit, a deficit no one at the HuffPo ever cared about until killing da’ babies came up:
More than 4 in 10 births in the United States — 42% in 2019 — are paid for by Medicaid, the government insurance program for the poor whose costs are split between the federal government and individual states. At an average of $18,865 per birth and with one estimate that there will be more than 150,000 extra births annually because of Dobbs, there will almost certainly be more spending.
This, of course, is naked eugenics: Kill da’ poor people’s babies.
But look at how dishonest and desperate this HuffPo argument is. When it comes to budget expenditures, why don’t we compare 150,000 more babies per year to a million illegal aliens per year?
Naturally, Democrats want you to believe infanticide will save the planet:
Are you kidding me? Listen, what causes climate deprivation is population. If we had not been systematically forcing women to have children they don’t want or can’t care for over the 500 years of patriarchy, we wouldn’t have the climate problems that we have. That’s the fundamental cause of climate change.
That was Gloria Steinem.
So there you go, America…
Want to end inflation? Kill da’ babies.
Want to lower the deficit? Kill da’ babies.
Want to save Mother Earth? Kill da’ babies.
Kill da’ babies!
Oh, Satan, yay, Satan.
Kill da’ babies!
Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC. Follow his Facebook Page here.
Hillary Clinton's New Campaign
By Terence P. Jeffrey | October 19, 2022 | 4:12am EDT
Former Democratic Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York was out campaigning again last week, but this time it was not for the presidency of the United States.
It was for an amendment proposed to the California state constitution that would create a "right" to abortion.
Clinton moderated a forum at a Planned Parenthood facility in San Francisco last Thursday to promote this proposed amendment.
Back in June, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade and returned the issue of abortion to the states. The California state legislature then voted by greater-than-two-thirds majorities in both of its houses to place a constitutional amendment on the state's November ballot.
Proposition 1, as it is called, states the following: "The state shall not deny or interfere with an individual's reproductive freedom in their most intimate decisions, which includes their fundamental right to choose to have an abortion and their fundamental right to choose or refuse contraceptives. This section is intended to further the constitutional right to privacy guaranteed by Section 1, and the constitutional right to not be denied equal protection guaranteed by Section 7. Nothing herein narrows or limits the right to privacy or equal protection."
Nor does anything in the language of this proposed constitutional amendment limit abortion itself. It does not include, for example, an age limit on when an unborn child can be terminated. It states instead, as noted, that the "state shall not deny or interfere with an individual's reproductive freedom ... which includes their fundamental right to choose to have an abortion."
So, if a woman is nine months pregnant and begins to go into labor, does this proposed constitutional amendment guarantee her a "right" to abort that about-to-be-born baby? Would a future state law that prohibited abortion after eight months of pregnancy violate this proposed amendment because it would "deny or interfere" with the alleged "fundamental right to choose to have an abortion"?
Catholic Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone of San Francisco, who has spoken out against this amendment, has correctly explained that it would create a state constitutional "right" to unrestricted abortion.
"Voters this November will be asked whether they support the 'right' to abortion for all nine months without any restrictions or limitations," Cordileone said in a video message he posted on his archdiocesan website.
"Sadly, California already has some of the most permissive abortion laws in the nation, with abortion allowed without any limits within the first six months of pregnancy," said the archbishop. "After six months, abortion is allowed for reasons associated with the life or health of the mother, including mental health.
"What Prop 1 proposes," explained the archbishop, "is to go beyond Roe v. Wade and beyond existing California law and allow abortion at any point in a pregnancy for any reason whatsoever."
This is what Clinton traveled to the archbishop's city to promote.
The San Francisco Chronicle published a story that carried this headline: "Abortion measure brings Clinton to S.F."
"Clinton moderated an hour-long panel discussion at the San Francisco Planned Parenthood office," the Chronicle reported.
"'You have to understand that these are highly motivated, relentless advocates for their point of view as to how all the rest of us in this country should conduct our lives,' Clinton said, referring to conservatives as 'the forces of darkness,'" the Chronicle reported.
"Speaking to a room of about 100 hot-pink-clad supporters, legislators and members of the media," reported the San Jose Mercury News, "Clinton told cautionary tales of repressive reproductive laws she witnessed in other countries during her time as U.S. secretary of state."
"How many women have to die or be terribly mistreated in order to change these laws that are so Draconian?" Clinton said.
"I see (Prop 1) as a critically important piece of the larger struggle that we are engaged in," Clinton said, according to the San Francisco Examiner. "And that's why California has to be constantly standing up for our foundational values and freedoms and rights."
The Chronicle reported: "Clinton said the fight for Prop. 1 was part of an effort to counter 'a much broader agenda to turn the clock back on the values, the rights and freedoms that this country has been struggling to achieve in concert with our founding values.'"
Here is Clinton's ultimate claim: This alleged "right" to take the life of an unborn child is "in concert with our founding values."
Yet those values were expressed in plain English in the Declaration of Independence. It states: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
Our Creator gave us all a right to life, not a right to take innocent lives. Proposition 1, which Clinton traveled to California to support, would do exactly that — take innocent lives.
(Terence P. Jeffrey is the editor-in-chief of CNSNews.com.)
Abrams: ‘Abortion Is an Economic Issue’ – Having Children Is Why You Are Worried About Inflation
Georgia Democratic gubernatorial nominee Stacey Abrams said Wednesday on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” that abortion is an economic issue because “having children is why you’re worried about” gas and food prices.
Abrams said, “Abortion is an economic issue. It’s been reduced to this idea of a culture war. But for women in Georgia, this is very much a question of whether they’re going to end up in poverty in the next five years because women who are forced to carry unwanted pregnancies they are four times more likely to be impoverished in five years. This is an economic issue and being reduced to a culture conversation. For families that have faced the issue of inflation, they care about housing prices. They care about whether they can afford to go to a doctor. That’s why I’m fighting for Medicaid expansion in Georgia.”
She added, “Let’s be clear. Having children is why you’re worried about your price for gas. It’s why you’re concerned about how much food costs. For women, this is not a reductive issue. You can’t divorce being forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy from the economic realities of having a child. And so it’s important for us to have both and conversations. We don’t have the luxury of reducing it or separating them out.”
Follow Pam Key on Twitter @pamkeyNEN
Stacey Abrams really, really wants to have women kill their babies
Stacey Abrams announced today that one of the ways women can avoid inflationary pressure (not that she mentioned the word “inflation”) is to kill babies in utero. Because Black women are more likely than any others to have abortions, and because she pitches herself as the avatar of Black women, this strikes me as yet another way to advance the left’s essentially genocidal campaign against Blacks, one that is grounded in a leftist ethos holding that humans are economic units that can be traded in for dollars.
I’ve lately taken to slinging around a new slogan: Democrats have realized that they no longer must enslave Blacks; they’ve figured out how to get Blacks to enslave themselves. In this case, Black slavery doesn’t refer to chattel labor. Instead, it refers to the slavish fealty too many Blacks have to the Democrat party. They will follow its damaging ethos no matter the costs to themselves.
At the behest of Democrat party leaders, large cohorts of American Blacks have abandoned the two anchors that have been consistently associated with social and economic success in America: family and faith.
Black children are disproportionately likely to live in single-parent homes (over 60% of them), which is a recipe for generational poverty. Moreover, women disproportionately head these single-parent homes, something very damaging for children. We know that boys without fathers are more likely to be involved in crime, while girls without fathers are more likely to be promiscuous. I also wonder if these same children are easier prey for the transgender groomers because they don’t have a balance of role models in their homes or communities.
Image: Black family by mego-studio.
As for faith, without the overarching moral principles from the Judeo-Christian faith, there are generations of Blacks, primarily in crime-ridden, Democrat-run cities, who have no brakes when it comes to criminal activity, whether assault, robbery, or murder. The worst of this is that those whom I call “feral” prey on those in the closest proximity—namely, other Blacks.
Wealthy Democrats, whether Black or White, with their elite enclaves, complete with high walls, far from the slums or their private security, don’t worry about the crime resulting from their policies. It’s ordinary folks trying to live good lives who suffer.
Many Blacks have also lost a central tenet of the Judeo-Christian faith, which is that we are each made in God’s image. That being the case, we must be precious, rather than disposable. Sadly, in the African American community, abortion rates are insanely high(footnotes omitted):
- Black women are 4.8 times as likely as non-Hispanic white women to have an abortion, and Hispanic women are 2.7 times as likely.
- 37.1% of all abortions are performed on black women who make up only 14% of the total population of U.S. women of child-bearing age.
This is Margaret Sanger’s dream made real. I call it “auto-genocide.” For a century, leftists have used force to diminish “undesirable” populations (see, e.g., Nazis, Stalinists, Chinese Communists, etc.). The Democrat party, uniquely, has gotten a “problematic” (i.e., high crime) group to vote for it and willingly kill itself to make room for the new more malleable immigrants flooding America.
That brings me to Stacey Abrams, the poster child for Blacks who are so lost in leftism that they believe that their well-being is dependent on extinguishing themselves. To that end, she appeared on MSNBC to argue that the best way for poor people (and she obviously means Blacks) to survive Biden’s inflation is to kill their babies:
Having children is why you’re worried about your price for gas; it’s why you’re concerned about how much food costs. For women, this is not a reductive issue. You can’t divorce being forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy from the economic realities of having a child.
Ultimately, for leftists, it’s always about seeing people as economic units. That’s why, inevitably, socialist medicine leads to euthanasia. But again, America’s clever Democrats are training Blacks to do it all voluntarily.
If Blacks ever fully break free from the party that simultaneously wants their votes and wants them dead, and return to voting Republican and holding traditional values, America will become a very different nation overnight.
No comments:
Post a Comment