CALL YOUR REPS OR GIVE YOUR JOB TO A 'CHEAP' LABOR DEM VOTING ILLEGAL!
"The newly elected president, Andrés López-Obrador, was gleeful during the election when he told his compadres they should all move to America, illegally. His encouragement along with his pro-poverty policies will set the stage for another tsunami of illegal immigration." COLIN FLAHERTY
Biden made his ritual visit to an El Paso scrubbed of illegal aliens and a detention center scrubbed of detainees. The entire Potemkin village setup was meant to kick off Biden’s plan to get rid of Title 42 and ram open the border all the way to flood the nation with illegal aliens even more than it already is.
How bad is it now?
“Using even a very conservative estimate of unknown got aways, Biden has released or allowed more illegals into the United States in the last 100 days than the whole population of Montana. An entire storied American state now exceeded by just 3+ months of foreign lawbreakers,” Stephen Miller tweeted. DANIEL GREENFIELD
Analysis: Biden Projected to Bring over 2 Million Illegal Aliens to U.S. this Year
Many families in Third World Countries have large numbers of children. If, for argument sake 25 million illegal aliens were to participate in the Biden/Harris Amnesty and if the average alien has four children, we could witness an immediate influx of 100 million alien children enter the United States! MICHAEL CUTLER.
Senators Draft Bill to Keep Title 42 Border Barrier
GOP Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C) and Independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ) have drafted a bill that would enforce the Title 42 border barrier for two years, and curb the catch-and-release policy that has allowed millions of migrants to walk into the United States.
“Our legislation gives them more time to put a plan in place that will secure our border … and ensure migrants are treated fairly and humanely,” said Sinema, who also chairs the Senate’s border management subcommittee, and has charted a zig-zag path between the two parties.
“The Biden Administration has failed to secure the border and the situation will get even worse once Title 42 is allowed to expire …. [this] will help prevent the catastrophic fallout at the border we will soon see if no action is taken,” said Tillis, who has repeatedly called for more labor migration.
However, there is no sign yet of any Democratic Senators who want to preserve the border barrier from the vast wave of poor, government-dependant, illegal migrants who are now walking through President Joe Biden’s border.
The Sinema-Tillis bill says:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, during the 2-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, an immigration officer who determines that an alien who is arriving in the United States at or along the border between the United States and Mexico is inadmissible … shall … process the alien for expulsion from the United States without further hearing or review.
Also, the migrants could be expelled to their home countries or to another “country with a government that will accept such alien into its territory if expulsion to each country … is impracticable, inadvisable, or impossible.” Many foreign countries would likely accept U.S. migrants in exchange for federal payments.
Advocates for more cheap-labor economic migration are complaining about the legislation.
The language “means other legal protections wouldn’t apply, including asylum or trafficking screenings for unaccompanied kids,” claimed Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a pro-migration activist with the American Immigration Council. “To avoid expulsion, migrants would have to prove—at the border—that they are likely to be persecuted or tortured in the country of expulsion,” he added.
But migrants are trained by coyotes and U.S. immigration lawyers to ask for asylum, knowing that President Joe Biden’s deputies use the asylum process to release them into the United States.
WATCH: Thousands of Migrants Processed in One U.S. Border Town in a Single Night
Brownsville PD via Storyful“To avoid being expelled a migrant [who asks for asylum] must prove that they “would be” subjected to persecution or torture in that country—so greater than a 50% chance [of harm],” complained Reichlin-Melnick.
The bill also allows the officers in charge of each border “port” to limit the number of migrants who try to enter the United States legally. In practice, Biden’s pro-migration deputies would set that level at high as they could manage.
Still, the bill is very narrow. It does not tell officials to complete the border war or its network of sensors. It does not reduce the inflow of legal immigrants, or the flood of visa workers arriving for seasonal jobs or Fortune 500 careers. It does not curb the taxpayer-funded system of shelters and shelters that are delivering millions of illegal migrants into American workplaces.
The bill also does not remove Biden’s Cuban-born, pro-migration border chief, Alejandro Mayorkas who has opened many quasi-level gaps in the nation’s border protections.
For example, the bill does not bar Mayorkas from using “parole” to let migrants into American communities. Nor does it bind the hands of Mayorkas’ growing corps of pro-migration asylum officers, many of whom are very eager to grant the huge prize of U.S. residency to families of poor migrants.
In 1990, Congress set immigration caps at roughly 1 million per year and also barred employers from hiring illegal migrants. The inflow was roughly one migrant for every four American births.
WATCH: Migrants Stream Across Rio Grande Ahead of Texas, Mexico Border Security Operation
Since January 2021, Biden and Mayorkas have imported roughly 6 million people via various legal, illegal, and quasi-legal doors at the border. That inflow is roughly three migrants for every four American births.
Mayorkas is a pro-migration zealot. He has said his border management is “all about achieving equity, which is really the core founding principle of our country.” Mayorkas’ demands imply equity between U.S. citizens and foreign citizens, and he has opened many loopholes for millions of economic migrants to cross into the United States.
He rejects any criticism of his deadly, elite-backed wealth-shifting policies. “We cannot have the rights and the needs of individuals who are seeing humanitarian relief in the United States be exploited for political purposes,” he told ABC News on January 1.
But that humanitarian pitch is tied to a promise of cheap labor for business investors. On December 13, for example, Mayorkas told ElPasoMatters.org:
Our immigration system as a whole is broken. It hasn’t been updated or reformed in more than 40 years. We look to our partner to the north that has a much more nimble immigration system that can be retooled to the needs at the moment. For example, Canada is in need of 1 million workers and they have agreed that in 2023, they will admit 1.4 million … immigrants to fill that labor need that Canadians themselves cannot.
Council on Foreign RelationsThe federal government has long operated an unpopular economic policy of Extraction Migration. This colonialism-like policy extracts vast amounts of human resources from needy countries, reduces beneficial trade, and uses the imported workers, renters, and consumers to grow Wall Street and the economy.
The migrant inflow has successfully forced down Americans’ wages and also boosted rents and housing prices. The inflow has also pushed many native-born Americans out of careers in a wide variety of business sectors and contributed to the rising death rate of poor Americans.
Migration — and especially, labor migration — is unpopular among swing voters. A 54 percent majority of Americans say Biden is allowing a southern border invasion, according to an August 2022 poll commissioned by the left-of-center National Public Radio (NPR). The 54 percent “Invasion” majority included 76 percent of Republicans, 46 percent of independents, and even 40 percent of Democrats.
DO A SEARCH FOR JOE BIDEN AND LARRY FINK AND BRIAN DEESE OF BLACKROCK!
GOP Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C) and Independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ) have drafted a bill that would enforce the Title 42 border barrier for two years, and curb the catch-and-release policy that has allowed millions of migrants to walk into the United States.
“Our legislation gives them more time to put a plan in place that will secure our border … and ensure migrants are treated fairly and humanely,” said Sinema, who also chairs the Senate’s border management subcommittee, and has charted a zig-zag path between the two parties.
“The Biden Administration has failed to secure the border and the situation will get even worse once Title 42 is allowed to expire …. [this] will help prevent the catastrophic fallout at the border we will soon see if no action is taken,” said Tillis, who has repeatedly called for more labor migration.
However, there is no sign yet of any Democratic Senators who want to preserve the border barrier from the vast wave of poor, government-dependant, illegal migrants who are now walking through President Joe Biden’s border.
The Sinema-Tillis bill says:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, during the 2-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, an immigration officer who determines that an alien who is arriving in the United States at or along the border between the United States and Mexico is inadmissible … shall … process the alien for expulsion from the United States without further hearing or review.
Also, the migrants could be expelled to their home countries or to another “country with a government that will accept such alien into its territory if expulsion to each country … is impracticable, inadvisable, or impossible.” Many foreign countries would likely accept U.S. migrants in exchange for federal payments.
Advocates for more cheap-labor economic migration are complaining about the legislation.
The language “means other legal protections wouldn’t apply, including asylum or trafficking screenings for unaccompanied kids,” claimed Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a pro-migration activist with the American Immigration Council. “To avoid expulsion, migrants would have to prove—at the border—that they are likely to be persecuted or tortured in the country of expulsion,” he added.
But migrants are trained by coyotes and U.S. immigration lawyers to ask for asylum, knowing that President Joe Biden’s deputies use the asylum process to release them into the United States.
WATCH: Thousands of Migrants Processed in One U.S. Border Town in a Single Night
Brownsville PD via Storyful“To avoid being expelled a migrant [who asks for asylum] must prove that they “would be” subjected to persecution or torture in that country—so greater than a 50% chance [of harm],” complained Reichlin-Melnick.
The bill also allows the officers in charge of each border “port” to limit the number of migrants who try to enter the United States legally. In practice, Biden’s pro-migration deputies would set that level at high as they could manage.
Still, the bill is very narrow. It does not tell officials to complete the border war or its network of sensors. It does not reduce the inflow of legal immigrants, or the flood of visa workers arriving for seasonal jobs or Fortune 500 careers. It does not curb the taxpayer-funded system of shelters and shelters that are delivering millions of illegal migrants into American workplaces.
The bill also does not remove Biden’s Cuban-born, pro-migration border chief, Alejandro Mayorkas who has opened many quasi-level gaps in the nation’s border protections.
For example, the bill does not bar Mayorkas from using “parole” to let migrants into American communities. Nor does it bind the hands of Mayorkas’ growing corps of pro-migration asylum officers, many of whom are very eager to grant the huge prize of U.S. residency to families of poor migrants.
In 1990, Congress set immigration caps at roughly 1 million per year and also barred employers from hiring illegal migrants. The inflow was roughly one migrant for every four American births.
WATCH: Migrants Stream Across Rio Grande Ahead of Texas, Mexico Border Security Operation
Since January 2021, Biden and Mayorkas have imported roughly 6 million people via various legal, illegal, and quasi-legal doors at the border. That inflow is roughly three migrants for every four American births.
Mayorkas is a pro-migration zealot. He has said his border management is “all about achieving equity, which is really the core founding principle of our country.” Mayorkas’ demands imply equity between U.S. citizens and foreign citizens, and he has opened many loopholes for millions of economic migrants to cross into the United States.
He rejects any criticism of his deadly, elite-backed wealth-shifting policies. “We cannot have the rights and the needs of individuals who are seeing humanitarian relief in the United States be exploited for political purposes,” he told ABC News on January 1.
But that humanitarian pitch is tied to a promise of cheap labor for business investors. On December 13, for example, Mayorkas told ElPasoMatters.org:
Council on Foreign RelationsOur immigration system as a whole is broken. It hasn’t been updated or reformed in more than 40 years. We look to our partner to the north that has a much more nimble immigration system that can be retooled to the needs at the moment. For example, Canada is in need of 1 million workers and they have agreed that in 2023, they will admit 1.4 million … immigrants to fill that labor need that Canadians themselves cannot.
The federal government has long operated an unpopular economic policy of Extraction Migration. This colonialism-like policy extracts vast amounts of human resources from needy countries, reduces beneficial trade, and uses the imported workers, renters, and consumers to grow Wall Street and the economy.
The migrant inflow has successfully forced down Americans’ wages and also boosted rents and housing prices. The inflow has also pushed many native-born Americans out of careers in a wide variety of business sectors and contributed to the rising death rate of poor Americans.
Migration — and especially, labor migration — is unpopular among swing voters. A 54 percent majority of Americans say Biden is allowing a southern border invasion, according to an August 2022 poll commissioned by the left-of-center National Public Radio (NPR). The 54 percent “Invasion” majority included 76 percent of Republicans, 46 percent of independents, and even 40 percent of Democrats.
DO A SEARCH FOR JOE BIDEN AND LARRY FINK AND BRIAN DEESE OF BLACKROCK!
INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS, LIKE JOE BIDEN'S BIGGEST PAYMASTSER, LARRY FINK OF BLACKROCK, ARE JACKING UP THE RENTS ALL OVER AMERICA.
ON TOP OF THIS, JOE BIDEN AND MAYORKAS IS FLOODING AMERICA WITH HOMELESS ILLEGALS.
WE HAVE NO IDEA, BUT IT'S STILL NOT ENOUGH!!!
Jeh Johnson: So Many People Are Coming over Border that It Is ‘Not Feasible to Keep Track’ of Everyone
On Wednesday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “Andrea Mitchell Reports,” former Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson stated that we cannot “keep track of” everyone coming across the southern border, even with additional resources, because the number of people coming across the border is so large.
Host Andrea Mitchell stated, “[W]atching those people just scrambling for whatever supplies, scarce supplies that they could get, is heartbreaking. And it shouldn’t happen. The wealthiest country in the world should be able to feed, clothe, house, and process…migrants to this country. This is a decades-old problem. There are 2 million cases backlogged. And why can’t we — we can say it’s political gridlock. But there is money in the budget available, discretionary money that could be thrown at this, hire people, process, and –.”
Johnson cut in to say, “When you have people coming across our southern border in these numbers, even with the additional resources we have now, it’s simply not feasible to keep track of them all. And the backlog in cases just grows and grows and grows and communities along the southern border are forced to absorb these large numbers. And then it becomes, as you know, a political stunt by the governor of Texas, the governor of Florida…sending people to here in New York, to the bus station, to Massachusetts Avenue, to Martha’s Vineyard, to Chicago, wherever else. And it should be done at a national level, in a more organized fashion where a number of states share this burden and take on this population, much like we did with refugee resettlement seven, eight years ago.”
Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett
THE FIRST THING NAFTA BIDEN DID WHEN HE GOT THE WHITE HOUSE WAS HAND NARCOMEX $4 BILLION DOLLARS TO FINANCE THE MEX PART OF THE BIDEN-MAYORKAS INVASION!
White House Deal with Mexico: More Migrants, Less Video
A White House official has signed a border management deal with Mexico to minimize the visibility of accelerating mass illegal migration once officials lift the Title 42 barrier that now protects Americans.
The deal is not intended to block labor migration into Americans’ workplaces and neighborhoods, said Rosemary Jenks, the director of Government Relations for NumbersUSA: “It’s all designed to mask what is the intended goal of the Biden administration — which is to bring in as many people as possible.”
The administration’s same-day announcement that it sending 1,500 troops to the border “is all part of that distraction,” she added. The troops will be “pushing paper and stocking warehouses” to help Biden’s border agents and its progressive non-profit register more migrants for flights and bus trips to Americans’ cities and towns.
The deal with Mexico cooperation helps Biden’s deputies quietly funnel the chaotic and growing flood of illegal, job-seeking migrants through hidden side doors in the border, she said:
You no longer have videos of hundreds of people streaming across the Rio Grande [because] people are being flown in on taxpayer dollars, [and] poor people are coming through the ports of entry — again, with no legal right to be there — so that it doesn’t look like chaos …. [But] the end result is exactly the same: A massive number of people with no right to be here coming into the United States, using taxpayer dollars, taking taxpayer-funded services, competing for housing, competing for jobs, all of the rest of it.
Officials are already inviting up to 30,000 migrants per month to fly from four countries into airports around the United States. They are also helping to bus roughly 25,000 migrants from shelters in Mexico to border sites for quiet catch-and-release processing.
“It is stunning, the lawlessness of this administration,” she added. “They just create these programs out of whole cloth … — these people are making their own laws and nobody’s stopping them.”
The Biden policies are facing legal review in a federal court in Texas, and the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision by June.
Understandably, Mexico is using its power over the border flow to extract rewards from the U.S. government, she said.
“Mexico has power over the United States,” said Jenks. “Mexico is letting all of these people in through its borders, and it’s doing that very intentionally [because it has the power to] stop it, or … increase the flow.”
For example, Mexico steered up to 30,000 Haitian migrants to the Del Rio crossing in Texas in September 2021. The event was a shock to the Biden administration because the migrant flood was broadcast on the evening TV news to the many Americans who do not monitor political news.
“Mexico has no reason to agree to this [deal] if they’re not getting something of equal value or more value in exchange –I just don’t know what that is,” Jenks said.
The deal “consolidates Mexico’s role as the lynchpin in the US’ migration containment strategy,” said Mexican journalist, José Díaz Briseño.
The strategy is sometimes called. “border externalization,” because it allows White House officials — and their business allies — to quietly sign deals with foreign countries instead of openly negotiating with a divided Congress and hostile voters.
Mexico’s president, Lopez Obrador, is using his power over the U.S. border to minimize U.S. protests while he expands authoritarian rule in Mexico, said a tweet by author David Frum.
Obarado has long sought to swap border cooperation in exchange for more Mexicans and Latinos getting U.S. jobs that otherwise would go to Americans.
The White House’s official statement revealed little about the deal.
For example, it said, “Mexico will continue to accept back migrants on humanitarian grounds” without revealing the monthly cap on return. The current cap is just 30,000, which is far below the monthly arrival of more than 180,000 in April.
The statement does not discuss curbs on the flow of drugs into the United States, which now kill roughly 100,000 Americans each year.
The statement does not talk about the rising flood of global migrants from Chile, Colombia, India, China, Brazil, Cameroon, Nepal, Russia, and more than 150 other countries. Under Biden’s policies, very few migrants from those countries are being sent home. This passive policy ensures that successful migrants will summon many more migrants from their home countries.
Biden’s deputies want to import more foreigners for the jobs and homes that would otherwise go to Americans. For example, the pro-migration border chief, Alejandro Mayorkas, said on April 21:
Our model is as follows: Build lawful pathways, cut out the smugglers who exploit these vulnerable individuals. Build lawful pathways, give individuals an opportunity to reach the United States safely in an orderly way to avail themselves of the humanitarian relief our laws provide.
The White House statement did say that U.S. officials also plan to import another 100,000 poor migrants from Central America. The lucky migrants are the left-behind children of migrants who illegally sneaked into the U.S. economy.
The new pipeline comes after officials announced they would open two pipelines from Colombia and Panama, even as they expand many other inflows of migrants and visa workers.
“Everything that the Biden administration does has the effect of bringing more people into the United States who should not be here and do not have a right to be here,” said Jenks
In 1990, Congress set current immigration levels at about one million per year, alongside a flow of temporary workers for favored interest groups, including farmers, resort operators, and Fortune 500 companies. Those high caps provide roughly one immigrant for every four U.S. births but helped limit the migration-imposed damage to Americans’ national labor and housing markets.
Biden’s cooperation with other countries, and the establishment media, helped minimize the public recognition and response to Biden’s population policy. “They got away with [an inflow of] 4.5, to 6 million people over the last two years,” she said.
Despite the massive inflow, Biden’s deputies and their allies are portraying his border policies as a return to the l0w migraiton rules set by President Donald Trump and his deputies.
Extraction Migration
The federal government has long operated an unpopular economic policy of Extraction Migration. This colonialism-like policy extracts vast amounts of human resources from needy countries, reduces beneficial trade, and uses the imported workers, renters, and consumers to grow Wall Street and the economy.
The migrant inflow has successfully forced down Americans’ wages and also boosted rents and housing prices. The inflow has also pushed many native-born Americans out of careers in a wide variety of business sectors and contributed to the rising death rate of poor Americans.
The lethal policy also sucks jobs and wealth from heartland states by subsidizing coastal investors with a flood of low-wage workers, high-occupancy renters, and government-aided consumers.
The population inflow also reduces the political clout of native-born Americans, because the population replacement allows elites to divorce themselves from the needs and interests of ordinary Americans.
In many speeches, Mayorkas says he is building a mass migration system to deliver workers to wealthy employers and investors and “equity” to poor foreigners. The nation’s border laws are subordinate to elite opinion about “the values of our country,” Mayorkas claims.
Migration — and especially, labor migration — is unpopular among swing voters. A 54 percent majority of Americans say Biden is allowing a southern border invasion, according to an August 2022 poll commissioned by the left-of-center National Public Radio (NPR). The 54 percent “Invasion” majority included 76 percent of Republicans, 46 percent of independents, and even 40 percent of Democrats.
THE NEXT MEXICAN INVASION IS AT HAND:
"Mexican president candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador called for mass immigration to the United States, declaring it a "human right". We will defend all the (Mexican) invaders in the American," Obrador said, adding that immigrants "must leave their towns and find a life, job, welfare, and free medical in the United States."
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/07/mexican-president-andres-manuel-lopez.html
"Fox’s Tucker Carlson noted Thursday that Obrador has previously proposed granting AMNESTY TO MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS. “America is now Mexico’s social safety net, and that’s a very good deal for the Mexican ruling class,” Carlson added."
"Many Americans forget is that our country is located against a socialist failed state that is promising to descend even further into chaos – not California, the other one. And the Mexicans, having reached the bottom of the hole they have dug for themselves, just chose to keep digging by electing a new leftist presidente who wants to surrender to the cartels and who thinks that Mexicans have some sort of “human right” to sneak into the U.S. and demographically reconquer it." KURT SCHLICHTER
Title 42 Countdown: 700,000 Migrants in Mexico Waiting to Rush U.S. Border
As many as 700,000 migrants, a foreign population larger than Boston, Massachusetts, are currently in Mexico waiting to rush the United States-Mexico border when President Joe Biden ends the public health authority known as Title 42 on May 11.
In 2020, in the midst of the Chinese coronavirus crisis, former President Donald Trump invoked the public health authority known as Title 42 at the border, ensuring that federal immigration officials have been able to quickly return millions of illegal aliens to Mexico over the last three years.
On May 11, though, Biden will end Title 42 and expand its Catch and Release network to quickly move border crossers and illegal aliens into the U.S. interior — including deploying 1,500 U.S. troops to the border to free up federal immigration officials to process arrivals at a faster pace.
During a Yuma County Board of Supervisors meeting this week, supervisor Jonathan Lines revealed that Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials have warned them that as many as 700,000 migrants are waiting in Mexico to rush the border when Title 42 ends.
“Border Patrol shared with us their intelligence that there are approximately 700,000, as of three weeks ago, in the shelters in Mexico waiting to come into the United States,” Lines said. “They also shared with us that at the Darian Gap which is at the Panama Canal, they’ve seen a 500 percent surge in people crossing over that gap on their way up to the United States.”
Rep. Andy Biggs’ (R-AZ) office confirmed to Breitbart News that they too have been told by officials of the looming 700,000 migrants waiting in Mexico.
Such a “mass migration event,” as Lines said DHS officials called it, would see a foreign population arriving at the border that exceeds the resident population of cities like Boston and Nashville, Tennessee.
Randy Clark/Breitbart Texas“Right now, all of the people that are coming across the border, 40 percent of them are expelled under Title 42 in Yuma, Arizona,” Lines said. “So 40 percent of the people coming across are immediately expelled and they’re flown back to their countries of origin. That goes away on May 11; they are no longer processed out.”
Yuma County Sheriff Leon Wilmot noted that his law enforcement officers have their hands tied, unable to apprehend and detain border crossers and illegal aliens, as federal law would have them charged with kidnapping.
“[If we could arrest], I would fill the jail in a day with the amount of individuals that we encounter trespassing,” Wilmot said.
“International labor organizations and the cartels are facilitating this trade,” Lines noted. “They’re making a significant amount of money — 27 million were forced into labor over the last two years [and] 6.3 million [forced] into sexual exploitation.”
Americans in U.S. border towns like Yuma are especially hard hit by illegal immigration.
In February, Dr. Robert Trenschel of the Yuma Regional Medical Center detailed how in just one year, local taxpayers were left with $26 million in unpaid medical bills from border crossers and illegal aliens who showed up to the hospital needed care. That amount is set to increase, Trenschel said, when Title 42 ends.
Following Title 42’s end, close to 400,000 border crossers and illegal aliens are projected to arrive at the border every month. Such a monthly inflow of illegal immigration would exceed the resident population of New Orleans, Louisiana.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.
Analysis: Biden Projected to Bring over 2 Million Illegal Aliens to U.S. this Year
Many families in Third World Countries have large numbers of children. If, for argument sake 25 million illegal aliens were to participate in the Biden/Harris Amnesty and if the average alien has four children, we could witness an immediate influx of 100 million alien children enter the United States! MICHAEL CUTLER.
“The cost of the Dream Act is far bigger than the Democrats or their media allies admit. Instead of covering 690,000 younger illegals now enrolled in former President Barack Obama’s 2012 “DACA” amnesty, the Dream Act would legalize at least 3.3 million illegals, according to a pro-immigration group, the Migration Policy Institute.”
Evictions Double Or Triple As Rent Prices Financially Destroy Millions Of Americans
GOT TO HAND AMNESTY TO 50 MILLION ILLEGALS SO THEY MAY LEGALLY VOTE FOR LA RAZA JOE!
When are Democrat voters going to wake up and hold their representatives accountable?
It really is bizarre that there are so many people in this country that continue to vote for Democrats every election cycle -- at all three levels of government: federal, state and local -- when economic and social problems continue to get worse almost by the day.
During Biden's administration, inflation, crime and out-of-control illegal immigration have been the most notable. It's a reminder of Einstein's famous aphorism "the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results". This describes the Democrat electorate in nutshell, except for all of the institutional elites to whom these chronic problems don't apply. They just sit back and virtue-signal their wokeness while living comfortably and securely in their gated communities.
The facts and metrics that are demonstrably true seem to be ignored every election day. Biden’s administration has actually made life worse for everyone, including every single person within the Democrat voter base regardless of race, sex and ethnicity.
Of course, those in the upper classes, so many of whom vote for Democrats out of a seriously misguided noblesse oblige, are never seriously affected by bad Democrat policies they support. It was Bill Gates who convinced Joe Manchin, senator of West Virginia to cast the deciding vote for the Inflationary Reduction Act that's now projected to add an additional $1 trillion in more new spending under Biden.
But the financially secure suburban white women are more numerous and important when it comes to votes. They seem to be more concerned about legal abortion than economic policies that would benefit single mothers and families in the middle and the bottom, who struggle to pay their bills and put food on table month-in-and-month-out. And generally speaking, the numbers of those struggling financially are in the millions if not tens of millions, whereas the number of young women wanting to get an abortion is miniscule in comparison. So wealthy suburban white women who secured Biden’s last election voted on a very narrow social policy that benefits the few versus helping improve the financial well-being of tens of millions.
Under Trump, there was the lowest unemployment for all identity groups in history. All the Democrat voters outside of the wealthy ones essentially cut off their noses to spite their faces when they voted for Biden, who then gave them a hefty pay cut because of the inflation caused by his monstrous spending policies.
And as for all the young progressive voters, especially those who work in the tech industry, they basically voted themselves right out of a job when they voted for Biden. His inflationary policies that tanked the economy are catching up with Apple, Google, Amazon and Facebook and many other tech companies, causing them to layoff tens of thousands.
If you're a millennial or Gen Z, you really should be be wondering why you voted for Biden. For a young black business owner or one working a construction job or driving a truck for a living, the same could be said, when they see how much less their bi-monthly paychecks are going in paying the bills.
You would think that some serious soul-searching would be in order and they would begin questioning their loyalty to the Democrat party, since it has made life much worse.
Democrat voters will see the light and take a hard look at the GOP and how their policies can actually make their life much better financially in so many ways, I hope. The same can be said about the misguided wealthy and financially secure suburban white women, who many political analysts say were the difference in the 2020 elections in putting Biden over the top.
It's time for them to hold elected Democrats accountable and throw the bums out of office to send them a signal that they're not pleased with the current policies that are not improving the lives of anyone except their donors and the billionaire and millionaire classes.
Many families in Third World Countries have large numbers of children. If, for argument sake 25 million illegal aliens were to participate in the Biden/Harris Amnesty and if the average alien has four children, we could witness an immediate influx of 100 million alien children enter the United States! MICHAEL CUTLER.
“The cost of the Dream Act is far bigger than the Democrats or their media allies admit. Instead of covering 690,000 younger illegals now enrolled in former President Barack Obama’s 2012 “DACA” amnesty, the Dream Act would legalize at least 3.3 million illegals, according to a pro-immigration group, the Migration Policy Institute.”
Elissa Slotkin Touts Endorsement from Left-Wing Group Advocating No Cash Bail, Amnesty for Illegals
Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI), who is running to fill one of Michigan’s U.S. Senate seats in 2024, touted a partnership Wednesday she made with a left-wing group that pushes extreme policy positions such as abolishing cash bail, amnesty for illegals, and ending the filibuster.
On Wednesday, the Youth Vote Champion announced the pledges made by lawmakers and candidates nationwide to engage with Gen Z voters through the 2024 election. The group published a statement from the congresswoman saying that she was “excited to partner” with Youth Vote Champion because Democrats need to “work hard to engage and mobilize young people.”
Shortly after the group announced the pledges, Sloktin said she was “excited” to partner with them again.
“Last year, Michigan had the highest youth voter turnout in the nation, and the results speak for themselves,” she wrote. “I’m excited to partner with @VotersTomorrow as a Youth Vote Champion to help Gen Zers harness their political power and make a difference in our country.”
However, the group she is “excited to partner with” has pushed extreme policy positions such as abolishing cash bail, amnesty for illegals, and ending the filibuster.
- On cash bail, the group explained that it should be abolished because “no one should have to remain in prison for the duration of their case just because they do not have the financial means to pay their bail” and that “cash bail only applies to low-income people, and we need equal justice.”
- On amnesty for illegals, the group says that “immigrants are welcome here.” It supports the ending “the abusive practices of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to prevent them from further terrorizing human being seeking a better life in our nation.”
- On the filibuster, the group says it is a “long-time abused system in the Senate” to block legislation they claim is “popular.” The group thinks the Senate needs to “eliminate the use of the filibuster so that Congress can pass crucial legislation.”
Some of the other policies the group has pushed include the right to guaranteed housing, abolishing tipped wages, wanting universal health care – saying that health care “is a human right,” – implementing a “restorative justice system,” statehood for D.C., and canceling all $1.9 trillion in student loan debt.
Since announcing she would be running for the Senate, whom she partners with and whom she receives endorsements from are the least of her worries.
Last month, Fox News reported that the congresswoman ignored multiple comment requests to say why she signed a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) to talk business behind closed doors with a battery manufacturer with deep ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
The report noted that Slotkin and her deputy legislative director, Austin Girelli, signed the agreements to talk with the CCP-affiliated company about building an electric vehicle (EV) battery plant in Big Rapids, Michigan, — which is ultimately outside her district.
Additionally, after the last controversial campaign season, Slotkin and her husband got a divorce after 12 years of marriage.
It followed a very public controversy during the last campaign cycle when she was living in a residence owned by a “lobbyist,” who is a “part-time” corporate “executive” for a pharmaceutical manufacturer receiving millions in federal funding — and who has donated to her campaign — to run for the new congressional seat.
At the time, the “lobbyist” and his family were registered to vote at the same residence where Slotkin resided.
When Slotkin was confronted about the situation during a television debate with her Republican opponent, state Sen. Tom Barrett, she responded to the news anchor asking the questions, calling the attacks “political desperation,” as she claimed to be paying fair market value.
Even though she won the seat in the end, Slotkin’s Republican opponent attacked her by saying there were over 1,500 available apartments in Lansing, Michigan, at the time, yet she was living in the one owned by the executive who donated to her campaign.
Jacob Bliss is a reporter for Breitbart News. Write to him at jbliss@breitbart.com or follow him on Twitter @JacobMBliss.
NEARLY ONE-THIRD OF NEVADA
WAS BORN IN MEXICO!
THIS IS WHY THEY ALL HISPANDER OFF TO NEVADA!
Nevada Democrats Dismiss Voter ID as ‘Unconstitutional’ Despite Majority of Voters Supporting It
Top Nevada Democrats are dismissing legislation to enhance election integrity, which would incorporate basic protocols such as voter ID, deeming such “unconstitutional.”
Nevada Democrats — including Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager, state Attorney General Aaron Ford, and Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar — recently held a press conference where they discussed their agenda moving forward. During the press conference, the Nevada Globe’s Megan Barth asked the Democrats about the future of Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo’s proposed legislation, designed to increase the security of elections. In part, the legislation would establish basic requirements, such as voter ID to vote, and repeal the use of universal mail-in voting.
More specifically, SB 405 even requires the Department of Motor Vehicles to issue free voter identification cards, addressing the complaints from the far-left, who consider it too difficult for some to obtain a form of identification.
Per the bill:
Sections 3 and 4 of this bill require: (1) the Department of Motor Vehicles to issue a voter identification card, free of charge, to a registered voter who does not possess one of the acceptable forms of proof of identity and who is experiencing financial hardship; and (2) the registered voter to submit certain information with an application for the identification card. Section 5 of this bill requires the Secretary of State to adopt regulations relating to the issuance of such a voter identification card.
Further, the bill revises requirements to mail-in ballots, mandating that mail-in voters “include certain personal identifying information with his or her mail ballot.” It also establishes a new deadline for receiving those ballots.
Nevada Democrats are having none of it. Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager made it clear that Democrats will not give the election integrity legislation the time of day.
“This isn’t a problem that exists in the state of Nevada. It’s simply a solution in search of a problem,” Yeager said, asserting that there are no election issues in the Silver State.
“What we need is for elected officials in this state to stand up and speak the truth, and that is that our elections are safe and secure,” he continued, criticizing those who identify voter fraud as an issue that needs to be addressed.
“You can’t be a sore loser. You know, nobody likes a sore loser. The answer can’t be if you lose an election that somehow there was fraud. The answer is that you didn’t connect with the voters and you didn’t get enough votes to win that election,” he continued, adding that there are “no plans for a hearing on that bill.”
Democrat state Attorney General Aaron Ford took to the podium and agreed “wholeheartedly” with Yeager’s comments.
“Listen, when the government wants to put a requirement in front of you exercising a particular right, if it’s not constitutional, the question is simple: Is there a rational basis for doing it?” he asked.
“It’s not incumbent upon us as the citizens to prove whether it’s compelling or not. It’s incumbent upon the government to tell you why they are making you do something extra before you can exercise your constitutional right,” he said, failing to explain how requiring an individual to show ID is impeding on the fundamental right to vote.
Ford ultimately said that voter fraud, as compelling as it sounds, has not been demonstrated in a “sufficient amount” to “justify the imposition of a new requirement to exercise your right to vote.”
Ford then deemed requiring voter ID fundamentally “unconstitutional.”
“And I can tell you this, that this attorney general will not abide by an unconstitutional act like voter ID here in this state,” he continued, as Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar suggested that such requirements essentially limit access to the ballot box.
Not one of these speakers explained how proving one’s identity before voting violates the right to vote:
WATCH:
Their remarks come months after the release of a survey by The Nevada Independent and OH Predictive Insights, which found 74 percent of Nevada voters support a voter ID law. Only eight percent opposed it. Further, there was bipartisan consensus on this matter, as 93 percent of Republicans said they were in favor of a voter ID requirement — a sentiment held by 62 percent of Democrats and 68 percent of independent voters in the state, as well.
F
No comments:
Post a Comment