Exhibit 6: Biden reportedly bragged about the firing of a prosecutor who was investigating his son’s firm. You remember that? It’s on video for everyone to see.
So a prosecutor in Ukraine is investigating Burisma, and of course, this company is critical to the Bidens because it employs Hunter and pays him $83,000.00 a month. Now, there is some suggestion that Joe Biden got him the job. Oh, but the prosecutor was corrupt and we have to get rid of the prosecutor. Oh, really?
Don't Speak! Dems Attack Dem RFK For Speaking To Libertarians
It must be strange to be a Democrat.
On the one hand, the publicly-pushed guise of many high-profile Dems is that the party and its ideological ilk are all about “inclusiveness” and “free speech.” Yet they simultaneously work behind the scenes to censor speech, demonize those with different opinions about government policy, and claim that those who participate in conversations across party lines are the equivalent of apostates.
And much of this two-faced M.O. is on display again, thanks to the head of the New Hampshire Democrat Party excoriating Democrat Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. for his agreement to speak at a libertarian conference this coming weekend.
Related: Cue the Media Freakout: NH Pro-Life Ban on Abortion After 24 Weeks Goes Into Effect | MRCTV
According to the Boston Globe, NH state Dem Party Chair, Raymond Buckley sent RFK, Jr. an “open letter” of sorts, warding him off the dark-dark-dark path of speaking to those eeeeevil libertarians in the Free State Project at their annual “PorcFest Freedom Festival” in the White Mountains.
“Democrats in New Hampshire have a bone to pick (or perhaps it’s a quill) with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over his plan to speak next week at the Porcupine Freedom Festival, commonly called PorcFest.
In a letter Friday to Kennedy’s campaign, New Hampshire Democratic Party Chairman Ray Buckley warned that the annual event is organized by the Free State Project, which he called a 'libertarian extremist organization.' It’s no place for a prominent Democrat to dignify with a visit, he wrote.”
Well, as a guy who grew up in New Hampshire, and who used to drive five hours to Irvington, NY, to the Foundation for Economic Education headquarters to see liberty-minded economists, historians, and philosophers, I would like to counsel my acquaintance, Mr. Buckley, that I was delighted when I heard of the Free State Project twenty years ago, I’ve worked on a scholarship program with its creator, Jason Sorens, and have enjoyed many visits to previous Porcfests. The conversations have been some of the most rewarding of my life, offering me a ideas and suggestions for greater learning.
It's a shame Mr. Buckley seems offended by people sharing ideas – and by the idea of liberty, in general -- telling Kennedy:
“As a candidate for the presidency and a figure who commands considerable public attention, your presence at PorcFest will be seen as an endorsement of the Free State Project and its radical goals,” Buckley wrote. “Your presence will lend legitimacy to an extremist movement that aggressively works against the interests of New Hampshire residents.”
Of course, this angry rhetoric, couched in the “we know what the interests of New Hampshire residents REALLY are,” is nothing new from the Dems here.
When the Free State Project began, and voted to select New Hampshire as the place where members would like to move to live freer, then Democrat Party Chair Kathy Sullivan said they “weren’t welcome” here.
Which might inspire a few thoughtful people to ask some questions.
Since the members of the Free State Project embrace the “non-aggression principle” – since they want to respect other people’s lives and property and leave others in peace – why would Dems so vociferously object to peacefully-minded folks wanting to move here?
Could it be that they don’t like peaceful people?
Could it be that they particularly don’t like peacefully-minded people who might get involved in state politics and, thus, arrest or reduce the coercive power of state, county, and local government over people?
And are Dems like Mr. Buckley upset that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. might speak to a gathering of folks that, in previous years, has welcomed such illustrious speakers as economist Tom Woods, economist Robert Murphy, philosopher Stephan Molyneux, Dr. Mary Ruwart, and bestselling novelist/doctor F. Paul Wilson ?
And is Mr. Buckley, perhaps, a bit jealous of other scheduled speakers who, due to some of their positions and their openness to conversation, also are scheduled to speak at Porcfest?
On Twitter, my friend, and one of the key organizers for many Free State Project events, Carla Gericke observed:
“I do love how everyone is showing their true colors, incl @BostonGlobe
shilling for Big Harma, the Biden crime family & establishment Dems. Fortunately, RFK & Free Staters like the truth. Come check us out!”
Those that do "check" things out may expect to have political discussions. Something the left can't seem to tolerate.
Follow MRCTV on Twitter!
Poll: Majority of Democrats Want Biden to Debate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
A majority of Democrats want President Biden to debate Democrat challenger Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a Convention of States Action/Trafalgar Group survey found.
The survey asked respondents if the two leading Democrat candidates, Biden and Kennedy Jr., should “engage in the Presidential Primary Debate process.”
Across the board, over one-third, 77.5 percent, said yes, the two should engage in debates. Just 15.6 percent said they should not, and another 6.9 percent remain unsure.
Predictably, most Republicans — 92.8 percent — believe the two should debate, as do 80.1 percent of independents.
However, this consensus is actually bipartisan, as 57.5 percent of Democrats believe Biden should debate RFK Jr. another 31.7 percent believe they should not debate, and 10.8 percent of Democrats remain unsure.
The survey was taken June 5-9, 2023, among 1,088 likely general election voters. It has a +/- 2.9 percent margin of error.
Notably, RFK Jr. has expressed an eagerness to see Biden on the debate stage, challenging the president to a debate throughout the primary process.
“I have known and liked Joe Biden for many years, but we differ profoundly on fundamental issues such as corporate influence in government, censorship, civil liberties, poverty, corruption, and war policy, among others,” RFK Jr. said in an April social media post.
“I look forward to engaging him in debates and town hall meetings, in a primary election that is honest, civil, and transparent. I invite him into a new era of respectful dialog in these times of division,” he added:
That same month, RFK Jr. slammed the Democratic National Committee (DNC) for having what he described as a “rigged” primary system, moving to voting to South Carolina prior to New Hampshire and failing to schedule debates.
“The DNC, at this point, has taken the official position that there will be no debate, and I think that’s unfortunate,” he said during an April appearance on Breitbart News Sunday.
“When you have so many Americans who are concerned about election integrity, we should be doing everything we can in our party [Democrat Party] to show that, you know, this is not rigged, rigged system. That it is actually democracy… people can run and that they can get to debate and that the public is gonna be able to see them, and they’re [the DNC] doing kind of the opposite,” Kennedy Jr. continued.
“There’s too many Americans who already think that the whole system is rigged against them. And this is confirmation of that. And I think that’s troubling,” he added.
LISTEN:
A recent survey from The Economist/YouGov found RFK Jr. seeing a higher favorability rating than fellow presidential candidates on both sides of the political aisle.
RELATED: RFK Jr. Speaks at 2023 Bitcoin Conference
Bitcoin Magazine / YouTube
No comments:
Post a Comment