YOU ARE PUT ON THE BENCH TO GAME THE LAWS FOR THE POLITICAL PARTY THAT PUT YOU THERE. LAWS AND ETHICS IN THE SAME SENTENCE WITH THE WORD "LAWYER "IS THE BIGGEST JOKE THEY PERPETRATE ON AMERICAN DEMOCRACY, A NOTION THAT WAS ALWAYS MORE FANTASY THAN REALITY.
The Mathematics of Democrat ‘Justice’
Judge Tanya Chutkan of the D.C. Federal District Court has ruled that the trial there against Trump will begin March 4, 2024. Many have already commented on how badly that will impact candidate Trump subjectively, given the electoral calendar's Super Tuesday primaries the next day. Attention should also be directed to how Democrat "justice" is being imposed on defendant Trump in objective terms.
Let's review the math.
When March 4 rolls around, the prosecution will have had about 38 months to prepare its case since the events of January 6, 2021. The Trump defense team will have had a little over six months since indictment. That is a disparity of over six to one, advantage offense.
There is more. Time alone is not the only factor affecting the opportunity for adequate trial preparation. There is also the matter of resources. Here the government enjoys a huge advantage. No matter how much in the way of resources candidate Trump is forced to divert from his campaign to the defense of defendant Trump, the government's resources in terms of manpower and funding will still be orders of magnitude greater. Even if we consider only one order of magnitude in the calculus, that converts to a discrepancy in resource months to over sixty to one favoring Democrat "justice."
Then there is the fact of prior preparation. The prosecution has already had a major portion of its pre-trial discovery accomplished in terms of witness interviews, document gathering, and video analysis (and splicing) by the unprecedented January 6 Madame Speaker Nancy Pelosi's Selected Committee. Since that committee repeatedly denied Republicans due process, there was no opportunity for Trump or his supporters to develop any evidence. In terms of that extensive prior trial prep, therefore, the advantage to the Democrat prosecution is literally infinite.
But wait -- what about focus? All the time, resources and prep are attenuated in effectiveness if one side or the other has a serious disadvantage in distractions. The D.C. offense can concentrate solely on that trial. Meanwhile defendant Trump has to pay attention to: 1) 87 other counts brought against him by Democrats in three other courts, and 2) all the while trying to campaign. Leaving the campaigning to one side and using the count of counts as a proxy for distraction results in a 91 to 4 ratio, or over 22 to 1 against Trump.
The Trump lawyers asked for a trial date of April, 2026. The prosecution asked for January, 2024. That is a difference of 27 months. By choosing March 4 next year, the trial judge "split the difference" in a revealing way, giving the offense 25 of the 27, versus two for the defense, or a ratio of over twelve to one.
At the time of the ruling, the government already had 32 months to prepare. With none of the advantages of resources and the Pelosi-aided selected trial prep, the Trump team asked for 31 months. Even so, in order to wedge the trial into a crucial phase of the 2024 campaign, the trial judge shortened the defense request from 31 down to eight months, a decrease to some 25 percent of the time that the government had already had.
Yet to be determined is how the trial judge will rule on future motions. Hopefully her inauspicious start will not be indicative of her future decisions, but it may 
well be. We the People should pay close attention to this aspect of Democrat "justice" as it unfolds. Particular concern should be directed to how she reacts when defense discovery requests are either stonewalled or slow-walked by the prosecution, whatever the excuses offered may be. Against such cynical rationales as "public safety," "relevance," "burdensomeness," or "National Security" must be placed the mathematically objective fact that every day of delay shortens the already narrow window ordered by the court for the defense to prepare in a very complex case.
Then there is the jury pool. The electorate in D.C voted about 90 percent against Trump, so in terms of jury selection, the math is nine to one against the defendant.
So far, the math discussed above relates to factors imposed by the weaponized government. There is also the contribution of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), primarily the media. If the past is any guide to what we are likely to witness, the bias stacked against defendant (and candidate) Trump will be at least a ten to one.
To summarize just these objective factors among the many that could be considered, here is what is already unfolding in terms of offensive versus defensive mathematical advantage:
1) as to time, over 6 to one.
2) as to resource months, over 60 to one.
3) as to prior preparation, literally infinite.
4) as to focus, over 22 to one.
5) as to the trial judge's start date ruling, a "split the difference" of over 12 to one.
6) as to future trial judge orders, to be determined.
7) as to jury pool, 9 to one.
8) as to NGO involvement, at least 10 to one.
There is a silver lining in these types of objective discrepancies, however, The American People will be able to see just how capable a man Trump truly is. As he energetically masters so many Democratically-hurled "balls in the air" all at once, We the People will be able to draw a stark subjective contrast: just how competent would a candidate/defendant Biden be if faced with the same sort of circumstances?
When Judge Chutkan made her trial date ruling, she piously intoned: "My primary concern here is the interest of justice." It would have been more accurate for her to have cited her mathematically revealed concern for "Democrat jJustice'."
Hopefully the Trump defense team can succeed in getting the March 4 trial date moved back by an interlocutory appeal. If they do not, however, envision what we will behold in March as Citizen Trump stands in the dock of the D.C. Court of Public Safety. In symbolic terms he will resemble the famous statue of Nathan Hale about to be hanged. For there he will stand, facing Democrat "justice," figuratively with shackled feet, hands tied behind his back and, in all probability unlike Hale, with at least one gag order stuffed in his mouth.
The author is a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Yale, was a National Foundation Fellow at MIT, graduated in the same Yale Law School class as Bill and Hillary Clinton, and clerked after graduation for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
ALL THE HANDLERS (THINK BILLIONAIRES GEORGE SOROS, LARRY
FINK AND MARK ZUCKERBERG NEEDED FROM THEIR PUPPET MAN IS
THAT HE BE A WILLING TO SERVE THE 1% BUT STILL PERFORM A
STAGED RENDITION OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY'S POPULIST LIES, BE A
DEDICATED LYER, A GAMER OF THE LAWS, AND THEREFORE A
LAWYER!
DOES THAT REMIND YOU OF THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE?
“Protect and enrich.” This is a perfect encapsulation of the Clinton Foundation (TWO GAMER LAWYERS - OWNED BY GEORGE SOROS) (WHAT ABOUT THE CHINA BIDEN PENN CENTER?) and the Obama (TWO GAMER LAWYERS - OWNED BY GEORGE SOROS) book and television deals. Then there is the Biden family (FOUR GAMER LAWYERS - JOE, HUNTER, JAMES, FRANK - OWNED BY GEORGE SOROS corruption, followed closely behind by similar abuses of power and office by the Warren (GAMER LAWYER) and Sanders families, as Peter Schweizer described in his recent book “Profiles in Corruption.” These names just scratch the surface of government corruption (ADD GAMER LAWYER KAMALA HARRIS (WANTS TO BE OWNED BY GEORGE SOROS) AND HER LAWYER HUSBAND AND THE BANKSTERS’ RENT BOY, LAWYER CHUCK SCHUMER, OWNED BY LARRY FINK OF BLACKROCK WHO OWNS A BIG PIECES OF THE ‘BIG GUY’ JOE, AND GEORGE SOROS’ RENT BOY (GAMER LAWYER) TONY BLINKEN, AS WELL AS CON MAN (GAMER LAWYER) ADAM SHIFF) AND HIS CORRUPTNESS (GAMER LAWYER) BOB MENENDEZ STILL EVADING PRISON
BRIAN C JOONDEPH
VIDEO
CUTE AND PASTE YOUTUBE LINK
how many of these clowns are gamer lawyers?
Burning Man Roast
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXC5OvdyWXc
For George Soros it was about control to gain influence, access, and special treatment. After the election Biden formed a transition team that staffed itself with people connected to Soros.
But his money also played a part. Soros spent over $70 million on activities that backed Biden's candidacy. Soros bought frequent access to Obama. That access returned under Biden. Biden's Kampf
DEM PARASITE LAWYERS GATHER AROUND THE SAME DADDY BIGBUCK$ NEO-FASCIST GEORGE SOROS
Records: Son of Billionaire Democrat Donor George
Soros Has Visited the White House 14 Times
One topic that Hillary is quick to criticize President Trump on is his relationship with Saudia Arabia. It’s ironic given the Clinton Foundation’s refusal to state that they will no longer accept financial donations from The Kingdom as others have.
For one thing, there’s a very sordid background to the story. The family has a long history of corruption and drug use unhampered by legal prosecution.
SHOCKING New Evidence of Joe Biden's Corruption
They have no undying allegiance to Joe Biden. He has always been an empty vessel that at a minimum, would protect deep state corruption from being exposed by an outside usurper such as Trump. But make no mistake, this is a seismic shift that represents a major crack in the deep state wall that has been hiding Joe Biden’s blatant and shameless corruption from the American people and electorate for decades.
The deep state is through with Joe Biden
When WaPo’s David Ignatius declares the man he did so much to install in the Oval Office should not seek re-election, it means something. Actually, it means a lot. Ignatius is a despicable excuse for a “journalist.” As I stated here, Ignatius was a primary mouthpiece for deep state actors peddling the Russiagate conspiracy. Any journalist with a modicum of integrity and self-respect—given what everyone should know now, and anyone with any intellectual curiosity should have suspected even then—would have outed the sources that fed him such bogus and blatantly false information. Alas, there have been no “mea culpas” from Mr. Ignatius or any outing of his deep state sources. Ignatius wasn’t an unwitting dupe; he was an active participant in the deep state coup to overthrow a democratically elected president. If this isn’t the definition of sedition, I can’t imagine what would be.
The logical conclusion that Ignatius is no more than a mouthpiece for the CIA is hard to escape. This is what makes his call for Biden to bow out now so significant. Mr. Ignatius is largely incapable of independent thought and when any does accidently slip through, he’s invariably wrong. Most anything you read under his byline isn’t what he thinks, it’s what he’s been instructed by his handlers to say. I’ve riffed more on this topic here.
Given this, Mr. Ignatius’s latest missive doesn’t reflect his personal view that Biden should step aside, rather the view of his handlers. It’s relatively common knowledge within the beltway and Acela corridor that WaPo is the go-to outlet for CIA “leaks” to drive media narratives while NYT is the FBI’s outlet of choice. How many James Comey op-eds have they subjected us to?
I must confess I’m not a regular reader of NYT or WaPo, but you don’t have to be to stay abreast of their continued onslaught of state propaganda. I once read where the only difference between the readers of the New York Times and Pravda (the Soviet era state propaganda organ,) was that at least the Pravda readers knew they were being lied to. I find this to be quite true and even funnier in that the NYT readers think themselves so sophisticated and enlightened. And WaPo is just such a nasty partisan rag it’s disgraceful. But the outsized influence these corrupt media outlets have can’t be overstated. The corruption of corporate media will do more to destroy the great American experiment than anything else I can imagine. When Trump said the media is the enemy of the American people, he wasn’t wrong. I said it LONG before he did, but no one listens to me.
But back to my main point. Ignatius isn’t through with Joe Biden, his CIA handlers are. And as Chuck Schumer famously warned Trump, “they have six ways from Sunday of getting back at you.”
As to the question of why, I can only speculate. Given the Biden crime family’s grift of millions of dollars from foreign actors, any intelligence around this would certainly exist within the CIA’s purview. It’s very likely they know that under a House impeachment inquiry they won’t be able to hide it forever, not to mention their own corrupt role in burying overwhelming evidence of what can only be characterized as treason by the holder of the highest elected office in the land. They have no undying allegiance to Joe Biden. He has always been an empty vessel that at a minimum, would protect deep state corruption from being exposed by an outside usurper such as Trump. But make no mistake, this is a seismic shift that represents a major crack in the deep state wall that has been hiding Joe Biden’s blatant and shameless corruption from the American people and electorate for decades. What other explanation could there possibly be for the “dirty 51” current and former “intelligence officials” declaring the Hunter laptop, that a majority of them had to know was true, to be a Russian disinformation operation?
If you are an outspoken journalist, the IRS will be sent to your home. If you are a concerned citizen who shows up to silently protest one of the cabal’s pet missions, you will be arrested. If you speak up at a school board meeting because your daughter was sexually assaulted by a transgendered assailant, you might be tackled and cuffed. If a given school actually tries to remove damaging wokism from its system all together, the feds will investigate it for civil rights violations. If you produce effective conservative messaging for Google and YouTube (which together control some 90% of worldwide internet searches), the courts won’t stop Google and YouTube from restricting or banning you entirely.
From Trump On Down, Democrats Are Silencing The Opposition
Following his historic federal indictment, Donald Trump correctly observed, “In reality, they’re not after me, they’re after you. I’m just in the way.”
Indeed, as the Democrat/Federal/Media cabal proceeds with its blatant lawlessness, banana republic indictments, frog march arrests, and kangaroo show trials, its members argue that all of this is both by the book and quite necessary—prompted by things like unprecedented, dangerous, and horrendous threats from MAGA extremists, white supremacists, terrorists, anthropogenic climate change, and attacks on democracy. Daring to speak truth about the COVID virus and treatments, about Hunter or Joe Biden, about the irregularities and illegalities that occurred in the 2020 election, the invasion of illegal aliens, mis-gendering someone, constitutes speech drawing punishments ranging from suspension or censorship, to IRS and FBI visits, to fines, or to imprisonment.
We see extensive news and analysis discussing how Republican and conservative conduct around elections (past and present) constitutes election interference, racketeering, soliciting a public official to violate his oath of office, conspiracy to commit forgery and file false documents, insurrection, making false statements, hate speech, threats to public safety, and more. President Trump and those around him, of course, receive much of this attention, but they are by no means the only ones suffering from the assault. In fact, as he has noted, he is not even the primary target.
Image: I’m in the way poster. Creator unknown.
A growing number of Americans is beginning to realize that there is another purpose to and message behind Democrats’ actions that extends to everyday people who might not like or support one or more of the things that the cabal is forcing upon them—things such as discriminatory CRT and DEI doctrines throughout our schools, weaponized federal agencies and the military, protection for BLM and Antifa violence, open borders for illegal and unvetted aliens, toxic and irreversible “gender affirming” treatments for minors, biological males in women’s spaces, costly and destructive “green” policies, massive taxpayer funds sent to Ukraine, student loan bailouts, mask and vaccine mandates, mandatory preferred pronoun usage, prevention or punishment of free speech, and so much more.
The debates regarding the constitutionality of given administration policies and actions, the validity and severity of the charges, the actual guilt or innocence of the accused, the likelihood of conviction, and the consequences of either acquittal or conviction are all popular headlines, all of which serve to distract from the central point behind these exercises: We Americans must understand that the cabal can and will use mob rule, lawfare, and bureaucratic fiats to effect its agenda, even when doing so is clearly politically motivated, invalid and unconstitutional, with the process itself often intended to ensure that political opponents yield to the cabal’s force. Nothing will stop them.
If you are an outspoken journalist, the IRS will be sent to your home. If you are a concerned citizen who shows up to silently protest one of the cabal’s pet missions, you will be arrested. If you speak up at a school board meeting because your daughter was sexually assaulted by a transgendered assailant, you might be tackled and cuffed. If a given school actually tries to remove damaging wokism from its system all together, the feds will investigate it for civil rights violations. If you produce effective conservative messaging for Google and YouTube (which together control some 90% of worldwide internet searches), the courts won’t stop Google and YouTube from restricting or banning you entirely.
It’s working. In their piece, “Keeping Your Mouth Shut: Spiraling Self-Censorship in the United States,” researchers report that the percentage of Americans who say they feel “less free to speak their minds than they used to” has never been higher. It’s now at 46%—compared to just 13.4% during the red scare of 70 years ago.
With such a convincing display of sheer totalitarian power, the typical American now worries that a $100 donation to American Thinker, Hillsdale College, Judicial Watch, or his church may put him on a federal watch list—or that he may increase his chances of being fined or sued by a federal agency, audited, arrested, or otherwise harassed.
He now wonders about the impact of cabal soldiers watching his social media posts, his email, and his overall internet presence. He now refuses to click either “like” or “dislike” for any post for fear of ramifications.
In past years he may have displayed campaign signs in his yard for his preferred candidates, but he’d be terrified to do so today. He even worries about some of the political or group affinity literature that might be seen in his mailbox.
He wonders if showing up at a simple rally, presentation, or school board meeting could mean he ends up in handcuffs and/or jail.
He has become more hesitant to discuss any dissenting views in public or private, fearing that he may simply not know where the danger in doing so could lie.
He wonders if he is now being monitored because he purchased ammunition or joined the NRA.
He now leaves his baseball hat and t-shirt, both which have American flags on them, in the drawer for fear they could make him a target. After all, even Republicans thought better about displaying one as part of the recent debate stage.
He now realizes that the point of publicly targeting and punishing cabal dissidents is to send a very clear lesson to the rest of America. The power of the cabal is the point. Behold it. Fear it. Obey it.
Twenty years ago, such expressed worries might have produced laughs and suggestions for tin foil hats. No one is laughing today.
Russiagate was the pivotal event that helped the cabal become more comfortable with its power, with both its capabilities and invulnerability. We now know that Russiagate was nothing short of a soft coup attempt that involved a litany of audacious and illegal actions to significantly hobble or even overthrow a legitimately elected president. The second objective failed, but the first was wildly successful—with the icing on the cake being that not a single conspirator was punished. Neither key leadership members nor operatives paid a price. A solitary, FISA-falsifying lawyer with a suspended sentence was the extent of the “accountability.”
If a football team has had nothing but success with running to the left side of its opponents in a given game, what play might the coach call in the 4th quarter with the game on the line? We see the same play unfolding today, only Democrats aren’t just using Russiagate to attack the quarterback. They’re using January 6 to wipe out the whole team.
Many Americans have been waiting for the adults in the room to wake up and end the madness. But any such adults are either asleep or occupied with their own legal battles. At this writing, the cabal is up to indictment number four for President Trump, along with who knows how many civil suits, as well as attacking any prominent people who supported him.
In none of these cases does America have the backstop of the U.S. Senate to shield us from the travesty. President Trump is facing a brazen White House and chief executive, extreme leftist prosecutors, hopelessly biased judges, and stacked juries, along with a rabid and cheerleading media. The odds are better than not that at least one of these initiatives will see President Trump in jail sometime next year. In other words, it appears quite likely, at this point, that very soon, he will no longer “be in their way.” Then what?
Hamlet ponders: To impeach or not to impeach?
A particularly welcome benefit of Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s announcement that inquiries will soon begin into whether President Biden should be impeached, is that the mainstream media now have to cover it and abandon their virtual blackout of the entire package of Biden family corruption scandals. Perhaps the most obvious example of media bias thus far has been their collective silence on the various pay-for-play operations that began during the Obama presidency.
Banking on the public’s assumed ignorance of the subject, Biden’s defenders are screaming from the rooftops that “There’s no evidence” of any misdeeds. However, expecting CBS and the New York Times to still have working monopolies on the flow of information is no longer a winning tactic.
Just airing Biden’s dirty laundry may well be damaging enough, while the formality of an actual impeachment may evoke increased sympathy among his remaining supporters, as it did on a larger scale with Pres. Trump’s impeachments. Also, we may be on the verge of establishing the unpleasant pattern of impeaching presidents just because their party lost control over the House of Representatives. In the 236 years since the founding of our republic, there have been four impeachments (counting both of Trump’s) and none have resulted in a conviction.
Speculation is also afoot that Biden’s own party is getting behind his elimination as a candidate for next year -- but for reasons other than corruption (wink, wink). The problem being that they have a particularly weak bullpen when it comes to finding a viable substitute. California’s governor Gavin Hair Gel remains at the top of the list even though he ostensibly just took himself out of the running. C’mon… he only meant to vaccinate himself from being branded as a usurper. He’d gladly let himself be dragged kicking and screaming onto the top of the ticket.
Had the lamestream news media provided at least a minimally adequate coverage of the Biden grift machine, there’d be no need to talk of impeachment. But such is not the case. Those who readily swallow the “There’s no evidence” drivel reveal in explicit visibility the true nature of the divide that bedevils today’s America. Some folks only accept informational input that conforms to their pre-existing idea of what reality is supposed to be. In other words, they already know what they’re supposed to hear. Anything else is dismissed as hostile propaganda. The other folks approach all input with healthy skepticism, and weigh it against established facts and perhaps other likely possibilities. Unlike the first group, the second group has no desire to conform to anything except objectivity.
If I were Biden, I wouldn’t worry about getting kicked out of office… at least until November of next year. Not only would the Senate pass on the opportunity, as it always has done before, but Biden has an ironclad anti-impeachment and 25th Amendment insurance policy. We call her Kamala.
Image: Ted Eytan
No comments:
Post a Comment