“Giving the Biden Admin more money to fuel its disastrous open-borders resettlement operation is insanity,” responded Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-TN). “It would worsen the border crisis, not stop it,” he tweeted.
The funding will “offer ZERO actual border security while providing more money to process more people … & continue to rack up mountains of debt,” said a tweet by Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX).
THERE IS NO GREATER THREAT TO AMERICA THAN JOE BIDEN!
The Media Research Center (MRC)’s Censortrack database,
which tracks online censorship, has surpassed 6,000 cases.
Examples include over 700 cases of criticism of incumbent
President Joe Biden, as well as a variety of posts on political
debates such as transgenderism and the coronavirus response.
Cases of censorship range across platforms, including Facebook,
Instagram, Twitter/X, Google, and YouTube.
More than 85,000 Americans annually potentially lose their jobs to foreign labor through the H-1B visa program.
Analysis conducted in 2018 discovered that 71 percent of
tech workers in Silicon Valley, California, are foreign-born, while the
tech industry in the San Francisco, Oakland, and Hayward area is made
up of 50 percent foreign-born tech workers. Up to 99 percent of H-1B visa workers imported by the top eight outsourcing firms are from India. JOHN BINDER
FIRST HAVE HIGH TECH
BILLIONAIRE CRONIES AT GOOGLE AND FACEBOOK CENSOR FREE SPEECH, IN
PARTICULAR AS IT PERTAINS TO THE BIDEN CRIME FAMILY AND BIDEN'S OPEN
BORDERS AND NO CAPS ON IMPORTING TECH WORKERS!
This is just one of many ties between Biden and Obama administration officials I expose in Breaking the News: Exposing the Establishment Media’s Hidden Deals and Secret Corruption, my new book revealing the secret ties between the establishment media, Big Tech, and the activist left.
CUT AND PASTE YOUTUBE LINKS
ON HIS FIRST DAY IN OFFICE, JOE BIDEN DIRECTS SOCIAL MEDIA TO DELETE ROBERT F KENNEDY, JR’S POSTINGS
My First Day In Office
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxVd1xhAxPo
KENNEDY ON THE BIDEN REGIME'S CENSORSHIP OF AMERICA THROUGH HIGH TECH.
In his monologue, Walsh calls out the
Republican politicians who, almost to a man, have had nothing to say
about the administration’s open disdain for the First Amendment or for
this miscarriage of justice. He thinks they don’t care. I think so, too,
but I’d add one other thing: They’re afraid. They’ve seen what the
Biden administration is doing to Trump. They know that, once the
socialists are in power, having been an elected representative of the
people and exercising their own right to free speech is no defense when
the Gestapo, KGB, or Stasi come calling.
ANDREA WIDBURG
Allum Bokhari is the senior technology correspondent at Breitbart News. He is the author of #DELETED: Big Tech’s Battle to Erase the Trump Movement and Steal The Election.
The Biden administration punishes speech and thought crimes
If our government
does not respect the Constitution, we have no constitution. If the
government refuses to stand behind the principles of free speech, the
right to free assembly, the right to petition the government, the right
to a speedy trial, etc., those rights don’t exist. Instead, we simply
have rule down the barrel of a gun…a gun held only in government hands. I
thought of that when I read about Doug Mackey, sent to federal prison
for seven months because he insulted Hillary voters, and Ryan Kelley,
given an extra-long prison sentence on a misdemeanor because he didn’t
grovel sufficiently before his J6 hanging judge.
Briefly, in the lead-up to the 2016
election, Douglas Mackey sent out some silly memes telling Hillary
voters to vote by text. Only a moron would believe that. There’s no
evidence that his memes had any effect whatsoever, other than saying
that he thought Hillary voters were morons. Moreover, what he did wasn’t
original. Others have done it, too, including leftists.
Nevertheless,
the moment Biden entered the White House, the DOJ came after Mackey.
The other day, he was convicted and sent to prison for seven months for
telling an obvious political joke. Matt Walsh covers the entire episode
in great detail in his video, and I urge you to watch it. (It’s the very
first segment.)
In his monologue, Walsh calls out the
Republican politicians who, almost to a man, have had nothing to say
about the administration’s open disdain for the First Amendment or for
this miscarriage of justice. He thinks they don’t care. I think so, too,
but I’d add one other thing: They’re afraid. They’ve seen what the
Biden administration is doing to Trump. They know that, once the
socialists are in power, having been an elected representative of the
people and exercising their own right to free speech is no defense when
the Gestapo, KGB, or Stasi come calling.
Mackey
wasn’t the only one who found himself a victim of the new regime’s
thought-crime police. Ryan Kelley showed up at the Capitol on January 6.
He did not go into the Capitol. Like Ray Epps, he remained outside.
Unlike Ray Epps, he didn’t urge dozens of people to enter the Capitol.
Instead, he said, “They can’t stop us all,” and he supported another
person moving around a metal bike rack, ripped a tarp, and took a photo
of blood on the Capitol steps. If he were Antifa or BLM, he wouldn’t
even have gotten a ticket.
But because he’s a conservative, while
in the midst of campaigning to be governor of the State of Missouri,
Kelley, a father of five, found his home raided, at which time he was
arrested in front of his wife and children.
Kelley was just sentenced to 60 days in prison…on
a misdemeanor! We’re getting used to these sentences against people for
daring to oppose the election outcome, something that’s obviously
allowed only if you’re a Democrat protesting Trump. There’s one thing,
though, that makes the sentence against Kelley exceptionally disturbing.
The judge wanted Kelley to be broken:
Of course, it was decided by Judge Cooper that Kelley, who has no
criminal record, should receive a harsh sentence for his misdemeanor
charge because, in his opinion, the former Republican candidate for
governor did not show enough remorse for his non-violent crime.
Kelley was sentenced by Obama-appointed Judge Christopher R. Cooper,
who said he had “some serious concerns” that Kelley was “truly
remorseful,” citing fundraising appeals Kelley made two years after the
riot calling Jan. 6 an FBI set-up.
“He shouted into the already riled up
crowd; he consistently beckoned the crowd of rioters forward, closer
towards the Capitol Building and police; he supported another rioter as
he was moving a metal bike rack towards the front of the mob on the
Northwest stairs, towards those rioters who were closer to officers; and
he took a photograph of human blood by the stairs,” prosecutors wrote.
The truth is, Kelley’s biggest crime was not blaming President Trump for his actions.
Kelley told the court, “It’s not his fault, the former president, for
my actions that day. He did invite us there, but my actions are my
actions, and I own those.”
When Queen Elizabeth I ascended the throne of
England in 1558, she ended decades of deadly religious persecution.
That started with her father, Henry VIII, who persecuted Protestants
when he was a Catholic. When he broke with the Catholic church and
became a Protestant, he went after Catholics. When his son, Edward VI,
became King, Edward continued to persecute Catholics. When Henry VIII’s
daughter, Mary I, became Queen, she switched gears and began burning
Protestants. Elizabeth stopped this cycle, saying, “I would not open
windows into men’s souls.”
Our American judges are not supposed to
make windows into men’s souls. Kelley committed minor acts of vandalism
and took responsibility for his acts. That should have been the end of
it, but in the type of behavior we’re accustomed to seeing in despots,
from British monarchs to all manner of socialist tyrants, Judge Cooper
looked into Kelley’s soul and decided he needed to be punished for his
wrongful thoughts. That’s deeply un-American and should scare us all.
One other thing: Could there be a better reason to get rid of judicial and prosecutorial immunity?
Image: Federal judges if you’re a Trump supporter (created using AI).
Join Me For A Historic Announcement
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9opkWJn5aE
THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS CONTRO U.S. BORDER BRINGING JOE'S UNREGISTERED DEM VOTERS OVER THE BORDER
Full Interview: Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAuierJI8PY
CUT AND PASTE YOUTUBE LINKS
DO A SEARCH FOR BIDEN AND BLACKROCK
RFK Jr. Talks About ‘Real Reason’ for America’s Housing Problems, Calls Out ‘3 Giant Corporations’
I Was NOT Expecting This: California Housing Market Update
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwfuHYMqDX0
CUT AND PASTE YOUTUBE LINKS
Landlords are doing MASS EVICTIONS (the Recession is underway)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emKbUqHZJXY
CUT AND PASTE YOUTUBE LINKS
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Blasts DNC's 'Rigged Process,' Slams Biden In New Forbes Interview
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TekGBJoeZiY
ROBERT F KENNEDY, JR ON THE SAD EVOLUTION OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY TO SERVE THE RICH AND WALL STREET
Return of the Democrat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AY30lRYFViM
Robert F. Kennedy on 'Surrendering'(to God)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAb8-KLdZog
ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR
Proud T Be A Populist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nI836hk4ZM4
CUT AND PASTE YOUTUBE LINKS
ON HIS FIRST DAY IN OFFICE, JOE BIDEN DIRECTS SOCIAL MEDIA TO DELETE ROBERT F KENNEDY, JR’S POSTINGS
My First Day In Office
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxVd1xhAxPo
Watch Tucker Carlson's Face When RFK Jr. Tells Him Why Dems Hate the Poor | DM CLIPS
Since NAFTA Billary Clinton, Dems have
been the party of bankster bailouts, billionaires for open borders and
bribes. Take a look at how filthy rich the Clintons, Obama's and Bidens
have become serving Wall Street and the 1%
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhQiqS0BMVc
ROBERT F KENNEDT, JR
How I’ll End Medical Corruption with Dr Drew
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMOym3-ftzk
CUT AND PASTE YOUTUBE LINKS
ROBERT F KENNEDY, JR ON BIDENOMICS
Economic Policy: An Introduction
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXWlfiulhe4
The average income in our country is $5,000 less
than the basic cost of living. I'm going to change that. Over the course
of the next few weeks, I'll be releasing an economic plan that focuses
on ending the corrupt merger of state and corporate power to make sure
Americans can once again afford their most essential expenses: housing,
food, childcare, commuting to work, and the healthcare we need to
survive.
CUT AND PASTE YOUTUBE LINKS
Robert Kennedy Jr: Power, Corruption, Freedom, & The Chronic Disease Epidemic Within America
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oI9Kg2naNfs
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Addresses Border Crisis and Releases ‘Midnight at the Border'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXlun2EYFvk
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Calls Government Censorship ‘License for Any Atrocity’
JEFF POOR
During
an appearance on this week’s broadcast of FNC’s “Sunday Morning
Futures,” 2024 Democratic presidential hopeful Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
warned of the dangers of government censorship.
Earlier in the week, Kennedy testified before the House Judiciary Committee on censorship.
Kennedy told host Maria Bartiromo that if the government could censor its critics, “it has a license for any atrocity.”
Partial transcript as follows:
BARTIROMO:
So what went on in that hearing? Censorship has been an issue for
several years now. We talk about it every day on this program and on my
program on FOX Business. What should be done about it? What can you do
to stop it?
KENNEDY:
Me — I mean, this should not be a partisan — or this needs to be
bipartisan. And the Democratic Party has always fought very hard, my
father, my uncle, and throughout its history.
The
word liberal means freedom and applies specifically to freedom of
speech. But we can’t have a democracy if we don’t have freedom of
speech. It is the cornerstone of our democracy. That’s why the framers
put it in the First Amendment. It is — as I said, it’s the sunlight,
it’s the water, it’s the soil of democracy.
Without
free speech, democracy will wither and die. And everybody knows that.
We have been warned about that by George Orwell, Aldous Huxley,
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Tessler, Heinlein. Everybody —
BARTIROMO: Yes.
(CROSSTALK)
KENNEDY: Everybody knows —
BARTIROMO: It’s the beginning of totalitarianism.
KENNEDY: Yes.
The people who censor speech, when we look back in history, they’re never the good guys.
BARTIROMO: Yes.
KENNEDY: And it’s inevitable that, if you do start censoring speech — because government abuses every power that it’s given.
And if government suddenly has the capacity to censor its critics, it has a license for any atrocity.
Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor
Democrat Rep. Dan Goldman Claims Big Tech Censorship Enabled More People to Hear of ‘Laptop from Hell’
House Judiciary Committee
0 seconds of 5 minutes, 33 secondsVolume 90%
NICK GILBERTSON
Former MSNBC Contributor and U.S. Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-NY) claimed that social media censorship of the New York Post’s Hunter
Biden “Laptop from Hell” story in the lead-up to the 2020 election
caused the report to “receive far more attention” than if there had
never been “any controversy.”
His
claim regarding the censorship, which he dubbed a “controversy,” came
during his questioning of Breitbart News Politics Editor Emma-Jo Morris
at the House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal
Government on Thursday.
Morris,
one of several witnesses at the hearing along with Democrat
presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., broke the “Laptop from
Hell” story at the Post,
which was heavily censored across mainstream social media outlets as
the 2020 election approached. The publication’s Twitter account was even
locked for a period.
“And
there is no doubt that this article received far more attention because
of the controversy than it would if it had ever, ever been published
without any controversy,” he declared.
Not
only does his opinion neglect the fact that censorship, in many ways,
discredited the legitimate report in public perception, but it suggests
that censorship, in this case, was more beneficial to the story’s scope
than if Morris’s reporting was not stifled. Further undermining the
argument, a December TIPP Insights polling survey revealed “half of
respondents said they would have voted differently had they known the
Hunter Biden’s laptop revelations were authentic,” the Daily Mail reported.
Morris testified at the hearing that the Federal Bureau of Investigation “knew” before December 2019 that the laptop was real:
House Judiciary Committee
0 seconds of 2 minutes, 13 secondsVolume 90%
Goldman
stated, “There was a laptop, it’s a computer, keyboard, screen — it is
real,” before noting that Morris obtained a hard drive rather than the
laptop itself.
He
implied that the hard drive Morris obtained from Rudy Giuliani could be
Russian disinformation. What Goldman neglected to acknowledge is that
Morris verified the authenticity of the emails on the hard drive in
contacting the recipients, like Hunter Biden’s one-time business
associate Tony Bobulinski.
Earlier in the hearing, Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA) yielded his final 30 seconds to Goldman, who used the time to baselessly call Morris a “fringe-right reporter” without stating her name. She was not given a chance to respond to the Russian “Collusion” hoaxer’s aspersion.
WATCH: Breitbart’s Emma-Jo Morris Testifies at House Hearing on Censorship of LAPTOP FROM HELL Reporting
House Committee on the Judiciary / YouTube
0 seconds of 5 minutes, 39 secondsVolume 90%
2020 ElectionPoliticsTechCensorshipDaniel GoldmanEmma-Jo MorrisHouse Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal GovernmentHunter BidenLaptop from Hell
Google Being Google: YouTube Removes James O’Keefe Interview with RFK Jr. for ‘Medical Misinformation’
ALLUM BOKHARI
Google-owned
video platform YouTube has once again censored Democrat presidential
candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over what the tech giant calls “medical
misinformation.”
YouTube previously censored two other interviews of RFK Jr. twice, one conducted by the Canadian academic Jordan B. Peterson, and another by former New York Post reporter Al Guart.
In
the latest act of censorship, YouTube shut down an interview conducted
by investigative journalist James O’Keefe, founder of the O’Keefe Media Group.
According
to O’Keefe, who posted the video in full on Twitter (the platform that
recently rebranded as X), YouTube gave the same excuse for censoring his
interviews as it had for previous videos featuring the candidate:
“medical misinformation.”
The
nephew of the 35th President, John F. Kennedy, RFK Jr. has become well
known in recent years for challenging mainstream narratives about
coronavirus and vaccines.
In an exclusive interview with Breitbart News earlier this year,
Kennedy slammed the establishment’s embrace of censorship,
saying “we’re now in this situation where without free speech, democracy
just withers and dies.”
“Free
speech is the fertilizer; it’s the sunlight; it’s the water for
democracy,” he continued. “There is no time in history where the people
who were censoring speech were the good guys.
In recent posts on Twitter, he has condemned the Biden White House for its “contempt for the First Amendment.”
An economic populist and a critic of open borders, Kennedy has promised to use tariffs to protect American workers if elected President.
More
recently, he has condemned government agencies like the IRS, FBI, and
Department of Justice for “harassing and prosecuting opponents,
whistleblowers, and journalists” pledging to end the “toxic
polarization” of these agencies if elected President.
Allum Bokhari is the senior technology correspondent at Breitbart News. He is the author of #DELETED: Big Tech’s Battle to Erase the Trump Movement and Steal The Election.
Exclusive: Media Research Center’s Censortrack Database Documents 6,000+ Online Censorship Cases
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2023/10/17/exclusive-media-research-centers-censortrack-database-documents-6000-online-censorship-cases/
The Media Research Center (MRC)’s Censortrack database,
which tracks online censorship, has surpassed 6,000 cases.
Examples include over 700 cases of criticism of incumbent
President Joe Biden, as well as a variety of posts on political
debates such as transgenderism and the coronavirus response.
Cases of censorship range across platforms, including Facebook,
Instagram, Twitter/X, Google, and YouTube.
In one recent example
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2023/10/17/exclusive-media-research-centers-censortrack-database-documents-6000-online-censorship-cases/
Judicial Watch Announces Premiere of ‘Censored and
Controlled,’ a Four-Part Documentary on Government and
Social Media Censorship Featuring Senator Eric Schmitt,
Congressman Jim Jordan, and Journalist Matt Taibbi
(Washington, DC) –
Judicial Watch announced the release of “Censored and Controlled,” a
four-part documentary that details the coordinated effort by the
government and Big Tech to censor and suppress information on topics
such as Hunter Biden’s laptop, COVID-19, and election debates. The first
episode will premier Monday, October 16, 2023, at 7 p.m. ET on the
Judicial Watch website, X/Twitter, Rumble, YouTube, Facebook and Instagram. A new episode will be available each day through Thursday, October 19, 2023. A trailer for the documentary is available here: https://youtu.be/prrHmQSoc6A
The
series features interviews with people who have taken leading roles in
exposing the collusion between government and social media to control
what Americans see and hear. Included in the lineup of experts is:
· Senator Eric Schmitt (R-MO) who as attorney general of Missouri filed a lawsuit in
2020 against President Biden and other administration officials,
alleging they were working with social media platforms to censor
information related to COVID-19 and other topics.
· Congressman
Jim Jordan (R-OH), who is chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.
Jordan’s committee is leading the House investigation into
government-led censorship on social media.
· Journalist
Matt Taibbi, one of the journalists who covered the release of the
“Twitter Files,” which exposed government involvement in Twitter and
other Big Tech censorship of Americans. Taibbi testified before Congress
about what the “Twitter Files” revealed about the partnership between
government and social media to censor information and opinions.
· Chris Nelson, senior investigator at Judicial Watch, formerly a career counterintelligence officer with the U.S. Government.
· And, Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, which has filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits and other litigation concerning government and Big Tech censorship.
The premiere episode, The Hearing, looks at Taibbi’s experience exposing the “Twitter Files:”
Today,
American taxpayers are unwittingly financing the growth and power of a
censorship-industrial complex run by America’s scientific and
technological elite, which endangers our liberties and democracy.
What
we found in the [Twitter] Files was a sweeping effort to reverse that
promise and use machine learning and other tools to turn the internet
into an instrument of censorship and social control. Unfortunately, our
own government appears to be playing a lead role.
The
Twitter Files, state attorneys general lawsuits, and investigative
reporters have revealed a large and growing network of government
agencies, academic institutions, and nongovernmental organizations that
are actively censoring American citizens, often without their knowledge,
on a range of issues.
Elon Musk took ownership of Twitter, now X, in October 2023. On December 2, 2023, the New York Post reported Taibbi
posted the first Twitter thread containing what became known at the
“Twitter Files.” This first installment contained documents related to
Twitter’s internal discussions related to moderating content on the
Hunter Biden laptop story which the Post broke shortly before the 2020 presidential election.
Nineteen
installments of the “Twitter Files” would be released through March
2023. These included internal communications related to the suspension
of former President Donald Trump from the platform, exchanges between
the FBI and Twitter’s Trust and Safety Team regarding suppressing
election misinformation, and moderation of COVID-19 content.
The second episode, The Hunter Biden Problem, addresses
the pre-election censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop story. From the
suppression of the initial and subsequent reporting on the laptop to the
promotion of the letter signed
by 51intelligence officials calling the laptop “Russian
disinformation,” the episode details the coordinated effort to suppress
Americans’ access to stories exposing the contents of the laptop while
promoting stories denying the authenticity of the laptop. Congressman
Jordan responded to this coordination saying:
The
guy who put the whole letter together, Mike Morrell, former acting
director of the CIA, said “we” did it because we wanted Joe Biden to
have something to use against President Trump in the final debate on
October 22nd, 2020. And we wanted that because we want Joe Biden to win.
In The Censorship Industrial Complex,
the third episode, Jordan, Taibbi, and Fitton warn of the partnership
among government, traditional and social media to control Americans’
access to information. Taibbi states:
Civil
society organizations are supposed to watch the government. The news
media is supposed. to watch both. The tech platforms are supposed to
have different interests from the government. But what we see in the
center in the censorship industrial complex is they’re all working
together in what you know and what they call the shared endeavor. And,
so it’s a consolidation of power.
Fitton adds:
I
think we just have to come to terms with the fact that the Big Tech
companies or social media companies are partisan leftist ideologues, and
they’ve been lying about the reasons they’ve been quote, “moderating
content.” They’ve been censoring content, not following a set of rules,
but following government dictates and their own ideological
predilections and political biases.
The series finale, COVID, Censorship and Consequences, examines
the organized censorship of debate about the origins of the COVID-19
pandemic, mask mandates, and Dr. Anthony Fauci’s efforts to control the
narrative surrounding the pandemic. Senator Eric Schmitt notes:
[I]n
the lead up to the 2020 election, we saw this massive effort by the
federal government to work with big tech to suppress dissenting views.
And that’s an un-American thing to do. And so, we filed the lawsuit,
which was a landmark lawsuit. And what we uncovered in that lawsuit was a
vast censorship enterprise, broader and bigger than anybody could have
ever imagined.
“This new Judicial Watch documentary series
exposes how the censorship partnership between
government and Big Tech is a dire threat to our First
Amendment and other freedoms,” said Judicial
Watch President Tom Fitton. “Judicial Watch will
seek to hold the ‘censors’ accountable – working
with elected officials, journalists, and other leaders
to protect free speech.”
This
documentary series was directed by Joe Weasel of Full Story Films LLC.,
and produced by Tom Fitton, Paul Orfanedes and Chris Farrell.
Judicial Watch is deeply involved in the investigation of censorship by government entities and Big Tech.
In April 2023, Judicial Watch filed two FOIA lawsuits against
the DOJ and other federal agencies for communications between the
agencies and Facebook and Twitter regarding the government’s involvement
in content moderation and censorship on the social media platforms.
In June 2023, Judicial Watch sued DHS for all records of communications tied to the Election Integrity Partnership. Based on representations from the EIP (see here and here), the federal government, social media companies, the EIP, the Center for Internet Security (a non-profit organization funded partly by DHS and the Defense Department) and numerous other leftist groups communicated privately via the Jirasoftware platform developed by Atlassian.
In February 2023, Judicial Watch sued the
U.S. Department Homeland Security (DHS) for records showing cooperation
between the Cybersecurity and Information Security Agency (CISA) and
social media platforms to censor and suppress free speech.
Judicial Watch in January 2023 sued the
DOJ for records of communications between the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) and social media sites regarding foreign influence
in elections, as well as the Hunter Biden laptop story.
In September 2022, Judicial Watch sued the Secretary of State of the State of California for having YouTube censor a Judicial Watch election integrity video.
In
May 2022, YouTube censored a Judicial Watch video about Biden
corruption and election integrity issues in the 2020 election. The video,
titled “Impeach? Biden Corruption Threatens National Security,” was
falsely determined to be “election misinformation” and removed by
YouTube, and Judicial Watch’s YouTube account was suspended for a week.
The video featured an interview of Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
Judicial Watch continues to post its video content on its Rumble channel (https://rumble.com/vz7aof-fitton-impeach-biden-corruption-threatens-national-security.html).
In July 2021, Judicial Watch uncovered records
from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which
revealed that Facebook coordinated closely with the CDC to control the
COVID narrative and “misinformation” and that over $3.5 million in free
advertising given to the CDC by social media companies.
In May 2021, Judicial Watch revealed documents
showing that Iowa state officials pressured social media companies
Twitter and Facebook to censor posts about the 2020 election.
In April 2021, Judicial Watch published documents
revealing how California state officials pressured social media
companies (Twitter, Facebook, Google (YouTube)) to censor posts about
the 2020 election.
###
HERE'S WHY HIGH TECH BILLIONAIRES LOVE NAFTA JOE:
In August, billion dollar tech corporations such as Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Twitter signed onto a
U.S. Chamber of Commerce lawsuit against Trump’s executive order —
arguing that they have a right to import foreign workers to fill U.S.
jobs.
Unlike Trump, Biden has promised to increase the number of foreign H-1B visa workers that tech corporations will be able to import every year. The practice is a boon to tech executives.
There are about 650,000 H-1B visa workers in the U.S. at any given moment. Americans are often laid off in the process and forced to train their foreign replacements, as highlighted by
Breitbart News. More than 85,000 Americans annually potentially lose
their jobs to foreign labor through the H-1B visa program.
Analysis conducted in 2018 discovered that 71 percent of
tech workers in Silicon Valley, California, are foreign-born, while the
tech industry in the San Francisco, Oakland, and Hayward area is made
up of 50 percent foreign-born tech workers. Up to 99 percent of H-1B visa workers imported by the top eight outsourcing firms are from India.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.
THE BIDEN COULDN'T EXIST WITHOUT INTERNET CENSORSHIP
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2021/05/collusion-big-government-and-big-media.html
This is just one of many ties between Biden and Obama administration officials I expose in Breaking the News: Exposing the Establishment Media’s Hidden Deals and Secret Corruption, my new book revealing the secret ties between the establishment media, Big Tech, and the activist left.
Media Research Center: Google Censors Campaign Websites of Republicans, RFK Jr.
ALLUM BOKHARI
Campaign
websites for Democrats who ran in the 2020 primaries are appearing
higher in Google search results than the websites of Republican
candidates in 2024, as well as the campaign websites of Joe Biden’s top
challenger in the Democrat primary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
The
Media Research Center (MRC), which monitors bias in media and tech
companies, discovered the biased search results when conducting searches
on Google for “presidential campaign websites.”
US
2024 Presidential hopeful Robert Kennedy, Jr. (R), speaks during an
address to the New Hampshire Senate at the State House in Concord, New
Hampshire, on June 1, 2023. (Photo by Joseph Prezioso / AFP) (Photo by
JOSEPH PREZIOSO/AFP via Getty Images)
Via MRC:
MRC
Free Speech America researchers searched Google for “presidential
campaign websites,” but the search engine did not display a single
Republican candidate on its first page of results the day before the first Republican Party presidential primary debate on Wednesday. President Joe Biden’s campaign website, of course, showed up as the second search result along with a Democratic Party challenger Marianne Williamson’s campaign website, which came up as the fifth result.
Google
even displayed results for past failed Democratic Party presidential
candidates who aren’t even running this cycle, including: Sen. Bernie Sanders’s (I-VT) website, which showed up as the ninth result; Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s (D-MA) campaign website, which came in twelfth; and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s campaign website, which appeared twenty-ninth in the results.
Notably, 2024 Democrat presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., did not appear in Google’s search results even though he is, at present, the biggest threat to President Joe Biden’s nomination.
Of
all major tech companies, Google and its related companies seem most
committed to maintaining a pro-establishment Democrat bias. While other
tech companies, notably Elon Musk’s Twitter/X, have claimed to relax
some of the draconian censorship measures against conservatives, Google
has ramped them up. YouTube, its video platform, recently doubled down on its COVID censorship policies, and has repeatedly censored interviews with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Just
days after the 2016 election, Google executives in a panicked company
townhall meeting declared their intention to make the populist movement a
“blip” in history. The full video of the meeting was later leaked to Breitbart News. In 2020, Breitbart documented Google making good on this promise, reducing the visibility of Breitbart News links in Google search results by over 95 percent compared to 2016.
Allum Bokhari is the senior technology correspondent at Breitbart News. He is the author of #DELETED: Big Tech’s Battle to Erase the Trump Movement and Steal The Election. Follow him on Twitter @AllumBokhari.
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2021/05/collusion-big-government-and-big-media.html
This is just one of many ties between Biden and Obama administration officials I expose in Breaking the News: Exposing the Establishment Media’s Hidden Deals and Secret Corruption, my new book revealing the secret ties between the establishment media, Big Tech, and the activist left.
This Is DNCNN: ‘Breaking the News’ Reveals Deep Ties Between CNN, Democrat Power Players
Ethan Miller/Getty Images
ALEXANDER MARLOW
28 May 2021944
2:30
According to NBC News and other sources, President Joe Biden is expected to appoint Tom Nides ambassador to Israel. Nides’ wife, Virginia Moseley, is Senior Vice President of Newsgathering at CNN.
This is just one of many ties between Biden and Obama administration officials I expose in Breaking the News: Exposing the Establishment Media’s Hidden Deals and Secret Corruption, my new book revealing the secret ties between the establishment media, Big Tech, and the activist left.
There appears to be overlap between Moseley’s work and her husband’s. WikiLeaks released an
email from 2015 showing Nides tipping off Hillary Clinton campaign
manager John Podesta to a favorable CNN poll that was soon to be
released.
Currently an executive at Morgan Stanley, Nides served as deputy secretary of state under Hillary Clinton. He was a top bundler for Biden’s 2020 campaign and is on the advisory board of the Biden Institute at the University of Delaware.
Nides
wouldn’t be the only Biden official in bed with a major player at CNN.
Karine Jean-Pierre, Biden’s deputy press secretary, is married to
CNN national correspondent and anchor Suzanne Malveaux. During the
Obama administration, Malveaux was assigned to cover the White House,
where Jean-Pierre worked in the Office of Political Affairs.
The latest conflict is par for the course at CNN. Last week, the Washington Post reported
that CNN’s Chris Cuomo, the younger brother of New York Gov. Andrew
Cuomo (D), advised the governor’s office on their response to sexual
assault allegations against the elder Cuomo.
In 2013, CNN president Jeff Zucker let his then-fifteen-year-old son Andrew join Democrat
Sen. Cory Booker’s Internet start-up as a “millennial adviser.” The
younger Zucker was even given stock, before quickly resigning amid media
scrutiny.
Read all the details in Breaking the News, out now.
Alex
Marlow is the Editor-in-Chief of Breitbart News, the host of Breitbart
News Daily on SiriusXM’s Patriot Channel 125, and the author of the new
book, Breaking the News: Exposing the Establishment Media’s Hidden Deals and Secret Corruption. You can follow Alex on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter at @AlexMarlow.
‘Breaking the News’: Marlow Reveals How the Biden Administration Seemingly Rewarded Big Tech After the Election
Joe Raedle/Getty Images
ALLUM BOKHARI
27 May 20213
2:28
Breitbart News editor-in-chief Alex Marlow’s new book, Breaking the News: Exposing the Establishment Media’s Hidden Deals and Secret Corruption reveals the deep connections between Big Tech and the Democrat party establishment.
Joe
Biden, who benefited from Silicon Valley election meddling during the
2020 election, wasted no time in appointing members of Silicon Valley’s
elite class to influential positions in his transition team.
Marlow writes:
Jeff
Zients, a former Facebook board member, is Biden’s COVID czar. Erskine
Bowles, a former Facebook board member, advised the transition. Jessica
Hertz, formerly a government affairs executive at Facebook, served as
the Biden transition team’s general counsel.
The
book goes on to explain how executives from other companies, including
Amazon, Google, and Microsoft were placed in the “revolving door”
between Big Tech and Big Government.
Breaking the News also
reveals the emerging trend of collusion between Big Tech, with its vast
surveillance apparatus, and the U.S. national security deep state.
Marlow explains:
After
Biden’s election win, the convergence of the national
security establishment and the Masters of the Universe began to reveal
itself. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Director of National
Intelligence Avril Haines both worked for the consulting firm WestExec,
which Blinken cofounded with Michèle Flournoy, a former undersecretary
of defense under President Obama. Google hired WestExec to help them
land valuable Department of Defense contracts.
From
a Reuters report from December 2020: “Google’s former Chief Executive
Eric Schmidt, a billionaire who is a Silicon Valley titan, has
been making personnel recommendations for appointments to the Department
of Defense—as the company tries to pursue military contracts
and defense work, according to three sources.” When Biden was sworn in,
Schmidt was appointed to lead a government panel on artificial
intelligence.
Marlow contacted Schmidt’s team in an effort to confirm the Reuters report — but they refused to comment.
Alex Marlow’s Breaking the News: Exposing the Establishment Media’s Hidden Deals and Secret Corruption delves deeper into Google’s massive election interference machine.
TechAlex
Nolte:
Russell Brand Tells the Truth About Democrat, Media, Big Tech Collusion
to Hide Biden Scandals and Influence 2020 Election
Matt Sayles/Invision/AP
JOHN NOLTE
26 May 202181
3:55
Unlike
all the left-wing posers in the world of entertainment who shamelessly
toe the line when it comes to the establishment’s “approved” lines of
thought and who then declare themselves brave for bravely siding
with the government, big business, and big media, actor-comedian
Russell Brand actually said something brave the other day.
“Did
the media and social media conspire together to keep information about
Joe Biden and Hunter Biden’s relationship with foreign energy companies
out of the media?” Brand asked rhetorically. “The answer is: Yes, they did.”
Brand spoke this truth in a video introducing
a clip from his podcast Under the Skin where he interviewed independent
journalist Glenn Greenwald about this appalling collusion.
Watch below:
Brand’s comments align closely with what Breitbart editor-in-chief Alex Marlow exposed in his new bestseller, Breaking the News: Exposing the Establishment Media’s Hidden Deals and Secret Corruption.
“Some
of the most powerful people in the world, the Masters of the Universe
in Silicon Valley — none of them elected, most of them anonymous —
turned dials to increase or decrease the flow of critical information
the American electorate needed to make informed decisions in the
presidential race,” writes Marlow.
Marlow
goes on to point out how the suppression of negative Biden stories
(Hunter Biden’s laptop story is the most egregious example) and positive
Trump stories were part of a coordinated, deliberate, and dishonest
scheme designed to damage Trump’s reelection chances by misinforming the
public.
Although he’s no Republican, and says so, Brand saw the exact same thing happen. Later in the video he says:
Look,
I’m not a pro-Republican person. I don’t see myself that way. I don’t
see myself as a conservative, or that I’m in a Trump or Giuliani or
media establishments that were reporting on these revelations, they are
not my cultural, social, or political allies. That’s certainly not how I
see myself. However, it seems to me that what reason is Hunter Biden
on the board of an energy company in the Ukraine? What reason is [Joe
Biden’s brother] James Biden on the board or receiving payments from an
energy company in China?
…
[F]or
me, revelations that there are financial connections between energy
companies in the Ukraine, energy companies in China, and the Biden
family are troubling. That should be public knowledge. And it’s even
more troubling that Twitter and Facebook and the media at large
deliberately kept it out of the news because they didn’t want it to
influence the election. What is democracy, then? It suggests to me that
democracy is, ‘We want you to vote for this person. We don’t want you to
vote for that person.’
As
I’ve said … I don’t think Donald Trump’s the answer, but I’m sad to
realize that I can no longer even claim to believe that Joe Biden or the
Democratic Party might be the answer, because look at how they behave.
And look at the relationships between media, social media, and that
party. They conspired to keep information away from you because it was
not convenient to their agenda.
None of what Brand (or Marlow) said is opinion. It is fact.
The New York Post’s bombshell
reports about the disclosures on what is almost certainly Hunter
Biden’s laptop, and what those disclosures reveal about the Biden
family’s corruption, were openly and proudly suppressed by the corporate
media and Big Tech.
Then you have all the fake fact checking (the Wuhan lab leak) on top of the flat-out lies (Trump called Nazis very good people) on top of the canceling and blacklisting and throttling to silence dissident voices.
Good on Brand for speaking up. Let’s hope some others in his field find the same moral courage.
Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC. Follow his Facebook Page here.
Likewise, the Biden-Harris plan for national
immigration policy — which seeks to drive up
legal and illegal immigration levels to their
highest levels in decades — offers a flooded
labor market with low wages for U.S. workers
and increased bargaining power for big
business that has long been supported by Wall
Street. JOHN BINDER
Alex Marlow: Don’t Call It ‘Stolen’ — How the Big Tech Masters of the Universe Imposed Their Will on the American Electorate
944GRAEME JENNINGS/POOL/AFP via Getty Images
REBECCA MANSOUR
22 May 20211,991
4:22
“The
manipulation of social media platforms and activism by partisan
Democrats in Silicon Valley was a deciding factor in the outcome of the
2020 presidential election,” Breitbart News Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow
explains in an op-ed in the Washington Times detailing his research into the 2020 election from his new book Breaking the News: Exposing the Establishment Media’s Hidden Deals and Secret Corruption.
Marlow
writes that the 2020 election wasn’t “stolen” from Donald Trump in some
“spy-thriller-esque” conspiracy involving Hugo Chavez and voting
machines, and suggesting that it was “stolen” is the “easiest way to get
removed from the Internet and social media.” However, the true story of
how Democrats won is still troubling and reeks of corruption, according
to Marlow.
First,
he explains how Silicon Valley’s Masters of the Universe controlled the
flow of critical information: “Some of the most powerful people in the
world, the Masters of the Universe in Silicon Valley — none of them
elected, most of them anonymous — turned dials to increase or decrease
the flow of critical information the American electorate needed to make
informed decisions in the presidential race.”
Marlow
points to Big Tech censorship of stories about Hunter Biden’s
corruption scandals, as well as Google suppressing Breitbart News’
traffic for anyone searching for articles about “Joe Biden.” Suppression
of negative stories about Biden – as well as positive stories about
Trump – had the potential of swinging voters in key states, Marlow
notes, highlighting a poll conducted by the Media Research Center
showing that 17 percent of Biden voters would have changed their votes
had they known about certain stories widely covered by Breitbart News.
In
addition to controlling the “flow of information,” Silicon Valley
billionaires also spent lavishly to impact the election at the ballot
box, particularly with the push for vote-by-mail, Marlow explains:
If
you had any doubt those who control the flow of information in this
country were determined to get Trump out of power, look no further than
Mark Zuckerberg. The Facebook CEO spent hundreds of millions of dollars
on “safe” election administration, but these efforts appear to have been
little more than a de facto get-out-the-vote (GOTV) operation to
benefit Democrats.
The
centerpiece of this was COVID-safe “drop boxes.” These were bins that
look like aluminum public trash cans, placed throughout the country,
largely unprotected and unguarded (compared to in-person voting). These
made it easier for people to “safely” turn in their mail-in ballots.
Critics of the plan said that a high number of these drop boxes were
placed in precincts that favor Democrats, particularly ones that were
likely to be close races. These drop boxes weren’t necessary anyway, as
in-person voting did not worsen the pandemic.
Yet,
the sad reality is that Republicans, by and large, let the Masters of
the Universe do all this. Perhaps it was because they feared harming the
tech companies that were driving the stock markets to record highs,
maybe they were following a blind loyalty to the free market, perhaps
many were paid off by Big Tech lobbyists, certainly some were uninformed
and ignorant. Whatever the explanation is, the GOP was wildly
ineffective at protecting their own voters’ ability to freely read and
share information.
Marlow
calls on Republicans to pursue legislative reforms to rein in Big Tech,
including “legislation to treat social media platforms as common
carriers like trains or phone companies; this would prevent them from
discriminating based on political ideology (or any other reason, for
that matter).”
“Breaking
up the biggest technology companies, reforms to antitrust law, and
reforming the safe harbor for censorship of section 230 of the
Communications Decency Act should all be considered,” he writes. “But
most importantly, conservatives must turn to governors, legislatures,
and Attorneys General in Republican-led states. This will take political
willpower, but it can be done.”
Marlow’s book Breaking the News is now available.
Rebecca Mansour is Senior Editor-at-Large for Breitbart News. Follow her on Twitter at @RAMansour.
Reports: India’s H-1B Workers Back Joe Biden
for President
NEIL MUNRO
Indian
H-1B visa workers in the United States are rooting for Joe Biden and
hoping President Donald Trump and his pro-American reforms will get the
boot, according to reports in Indian media.
“Many H-1B visa holders, according to Jeya Ganesh, are wishing for a Biden win,” said a
report in IndiaTimes.com. “Biden would be the preferred choice for
skilled workers. He established clearly that he would resolve the
hurdles for tech workers,” he said, adding, “If Trump gets reelected …
Canada is one option I am looking forward to.”
At
least 500,000 Indians hold H-1B visas or H4EAD work permits that keep
them in a wide range of U.S. white-collar jobs — despite the exclusion
of many American graduates from career jobs. Nearly all of those visa
workers hope the federal government will quickly provide them with the
huge prize of green cards and citizenship. But that process is facing
political challenges as Trump pushes popular rewrites of the H-1B program to help younger American graduates get white-collar jobs.
The
support for Biden among Indians reflects the same rational assessment
made by poor migrants at the U.S-Mexican border. “Asylum-seekers
stranded in Matamoros, Mexico, have a plea for voters in November: Elect
Joe Biden and “get us out of this hell,” said an October 20 report from the New Republic:
Migrants (& Wall St.) say they want Joe Biden to win – b/c he will open the United States to many more cheap-labor migrants.
That
huge inflow, of course, would cut wages & raise housing $, so
shifting yet more wealth to employers & coastal investors. https://t.co/6LGJQtVTj9
— Neil Munro (@NeilMunroDC) October 27, 2020
“The
most pressing concerns for many [migrant] Indians and [citizen]
Indian-Americans remain immigration and H-1B visas and how the outcome
of the elections impact these issues,” said IndiaExpress.com:
“If
Biden-Harris prevail, the immigration situation will improve,” says
[Manish] Kothari. “However, the H-1B situation could continue to be
challenging because of how the State Department has changed under the
Trump administration. It will take some time to undo these changes.”
Trump’s
hostile immigration policies over the past four years have deeply
impacted many Silicon Valley employees and their families. “Many workers
had to return and this could continue in the next administration.
Students who come to the US will be protected because new H-1B entrants
from India will have more challenges arriving. We’ve already seen both
examples of workers having to return to India and students rising to
take available jobs,” explains [Nirav] Shah.
Pramod, who “has spent nearly 13 years in the US, said he would want to see Biden as the next US president,” according to the IndiaTimes.com. “Biden is good. But I don’t want to keep my hopes up,” he said.
Indian
students in the United States, many of whom cycle between university
courses and visa jobs, also support Biden. “I personally feel that
[Trump’s student visa reform] this is some sort of attack on the
international students,” said Ratul Biswas, a University of Minnesota
Ph.D. student from India. He told the Star Tribune that he hopes to land a job as a professor in the flooded market for U.S. academic slots.
“Of course Biden,” responded Ajay Bhutoria,
a Democrat-aligned Indian in Silicon Valley, Breitbart News asked him
who is the favorite of Indian-origin H-1B workers in the valley. “They
don’t have a vote, but their voices are for Biden,” he added. In Silicon
Valley, he said 80 percent of naturalized Indians are voting for Biden
rater than Trump, partly because of the H-1B visas issue, he said.
“The community understands who the real friend of India is, who the foe,” Bhutoria told FinancialExpress.com. “Trump is a foe. … He has suspended the H1 Visa Programme [and] put trade deals with India in jeopardy.”
Many
Indian Americans rationally favor the H-1B program. The huge program —
and other visa worker pipeless — bring in at least 150,000 Indian visa
workers per year, thereby providing Indian-run businesses with cheap and
controllable labor and also expanding the cultural, economic, and
political clout of Indians in the United States:
Another survey shows Indian-Americans vote overwhelmingly for welcoming pro-diversity Democrats.
Yet GOP legislators support the policies that import roughly 150K Indian workers (incl. #H1B for US jobs) & 150K Indian legal immigrants per year. https://t.co/h03hkUtEQA
— Neil Munro (@NeilMunroDC) October 15, 2020
“Biden
has clearly said he is going to raise at the H-1[B] program and
increase it as the industry needs. He’s going to streamline the Green
Card process in the first hundred days … so people in the Green Card
[waiting line] can get the Green Card much faster,” Bhutoria told
Breitbart.
On October 22, IndiaWest.com posted an op-ed appeal by Biden to Indian American voters:
I’ve
always felt deeply connected to the Indian American community because
of the values we share: duty to family and elders, treating people with
respect and dignity, self-discipline, service, and hard work.
…
[Sen.]
Kamala [Harris] is smart, tested, and prepared. But another thing that
makes Kamala so inspiring is her mother, Shyamala Gopalan. We feel
Kamala’s pride when she talks about her. She was from Chennai, where her
father, Kamala’s grandfather, was active in the fight for Indian
independence.
…
We
also believe America is a land of opportunity. But it’s likely you and
your family have been caught in the middle of President Trump’s
crackdown of legal immigration and pathways to permanent residency and
citizenship and his decisions on the H-1B visa program. And his
dangerous rhetoric about immigrants has empowered white supremacists and
even fueled hate crimes against Indian Americans.
Trump
has also made much effort to win Indian American votes, particularly by
helping businesses and cementing trade and security ties with India as
its borders are challenged by an aggressive China.
Indian government officials also lean towards Biden, according to the Indian writer of an op-ed at
CNN.com, who briefly noted the importance of the H-1B visa worker issue
to India. “Indian diplomats say privately that handling the Trump
administration has been complicated,” he wrote, adding:
If
Biden wins, the Indian government can be expected to re-engage on
climate issues, an easing of immigration restrictions and a resumption
of less rancorous trade talks. New Delhi would also like to shore up
sagging multilateralism and expects a President Biden to be less eager
to pull all US troops out of Afghanistan, a major point of difference
with the Trump administration.
…
There
is also considerable vicarious pride in the choice of an
Indian-American, Sen. Kamala Harris, as Biden’s running mate. One
noticeable characteristic of the present campaign is the degree to which
both candidates have gone to woo the Indian-American community.
That the US is home to what is perceived by Indians as their most
successful diaspora is just one more — and arguably the most lasting —
reason that India and the US will remain close, irrespective of election
results in either country.
Trump's H-1B rewrite is a huge break from the Fortune 500 b/c it shrinks their outsourcing & subcontracting policies.
So a huge win for US labor-rights, but few journos have the freedom to get past corporate/progressive framing of #H1B as 'immigration.'https://t.co/2lPDZhY2oH
— Neil Munro (@NeilMunroDC) October 29, 2020
Businesses and progressives praise open-ended legal migration partly because migrants’ arrival helps transfer wealth from wage earners to stockholders.
Migration moves money from employees to employers, from families to investors, from young to old, from homebuyers to real estate investors, and from the central states to the coastal states.
Migration also allows investors and CEOs to skimp on labor-saving technology, sideline U.S. minorities, ignore disabled people, exploit stoop labor in the fields, short-change labor in the cities, impose tight control on American professionals, centralize technological innovation, undermine labor rights, and get many progressive reporters to cheerlead for Wall Street’s priorities.
Kamala Harris Raked in Cash from Big Tech During Democrat Primary
JOHN BINDER
During
the 2020 Democrat presidential primary, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) was
bestowed with the most billionaire donations of the nearly 30 candidates
who ran for the nomination.
In the primary, Harris secured more donations from billionaires than any other Democrat running, according to a November 2019 analysis by Forbes. Before dropping out in early December 2019, Harris raked in donations from at least 46 billionaires.
A number of Harris’s donations came from executives and employees of big tech corporations, as Breitbart News reported at the time.
By
August 2019, seven Facebook executives and employees had donated $1,000
or more to Harris’s campaign, nearly 20 Google executives and employees
had donated more than $1,000, four Twitter executives and employees had
donated more than $1,000, and 71 Amazon executives and employees had
donated anywhere from $5 to $2,000.
Notably, Harris took donations from
Impossible Foods president Dennis Woodside, LinkedIn co-founder Reid
Hoffman, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse, and Salesforce chairman Marc
Benioff.
Despite a lack of enthusiasm and support among primary voters, Harris’s campaign was propped up by
a base of elite coastal donors, with less than 40 percent of her
funding coming from small-dollar donors giving $200 or less as of
October 2019.
On
Tuesday, Democrat presidential nominee Joe Biden confirmed Harris as
his vice presidential pick. In a statement, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
(D-CA) called Harris a “champion for hardworking families everywhere.”
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.
Report: Facebook Manually Censored NY Post Biden Corruption Bombshell
TOM CICCOTTA
A
report published this week alleges that Facebook manually censored
the New York Post bombshell story about Biden family corruption.
According to the Guardian, Facebook moderators manually overrode the
platform’s automatic processes to censor the Post, an effort that
successfully censored about half of the engagement the article would
have received, according to researchers.
According to a report by
the Guardian, internal documents from Facebook suggest that the
platform intentionally restricted the distribution of a New York
Post report that allegedly revealed ties between Democratic presidential
candidate Joe Biden and a Ukrainian energy company. The suppression was
not automatic or based on Facebook’s AI and algorithmic approach to
content, but rather done by hand by Facebook moderators.
This does not come as a surprise as some Facebook executives announced their
decision to restrict the distribution of the report. In a tweet,
Facebook’s Policy Communications Director Andy Stone said that the story
would be restricted in some form on the platform.
“While
I will intentionally not link to the New York Post, I want be clear
that this story is eligible to be fact checked by Facebook’s third-party
fact checking partners. In the meantime, we are reducing its
distribution on our platform,” Stone wrote in a tweet on October 14.
While
I will intentionally not link to the New York Post, I want be clear
that this story is eligible to be fact checked by Facebook's third-party
fact checking partners. In the meantime, we are reducing its
distribution on our platform.
— Andy Stone (@andymstone) October 14, 2020
According
to an internal Facebook policy, the platform will remove “unverified
rumors” that could lead to violence, harm, or voter interference. It is
not clear how this policy is applied by Facebook.
“Generally,
we take action on misinformation rated by fact-checking partners by
reducing its spread and surfacing more information to people,” the
policy reads. “However, we will remove misinformation if it violates our
Community Standards, including misinformation and unverified rumors
that could contribute to the risk of imminent violence or physical
harm, voter and census interference content, and certain manipulated
videos…”
Facebook’s censorship of the Post was deemed successful by social media engagement experts that examined the decision. They found that
the Post‘s bombshell article only reached about half the engagement it
would have been expected to reach on its own. Mark Zuckerberg denied censoring the Post during his recent testimony to the Senate Commerce Committee.
Breitbart News reported over
the weekend that Twitter has finally reinstated the Twitter account
belonging to the New York Post. The newspaper was locked out of their
account on October 14 following the publication of the Hunter Biden
story.
Stay tuned to Breitbart News for more updates on this story.
Wall Street Praises Kamala Harris as Joe Biden’s VP: ‘What’s Not to Like?’
JOHN BINDER
Wall
Street executives are praising Democrat presidential nominee Joe
Biden’s choosing Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) as his running mate against
President Trump, feeling they dodged a bullet from a progressive
insurgency.
In interviews with the Wall Street Journal, CNBC, and Bloomberg,
executives on Wall Street expressed relief that Biden picked Harris for
vice president on the Democrat ticket, calling her a “normal Democrat”
who is a “safe” choice for the financial industry.
Morgan
Stanley Vice Chairman Tom Nides told Bloomberg that across Wall Street,
Harris joining Biden “was exceptionally well-received.”
“How damn cool is it that a Black woman is considered the safe and conventional candidate,” Nides said.
Peter
Soloman, the founder of a multinational investment banking firm, told
Bloomberg he believes Harris is “a great pick” because she is “safe,
balanced, a woman, diverse, what’s not to like?”
As
the Journal notes, many on Wall Street see Harris is another conscious
decision by the Democrat establishment to stave off populist priorities
to reform Wall Street:
To
some Wall Street executives, Ms. Harris’s selection signals a more
moderate shift for the Democratic Party, which its progressive flank has
pushed to the left in recent years. [Emphasis added]
“While
Kamala is a forceful, passionate and eloquent standard-bearer for the
aspirations of all Americans, regardless of their race, gender or
age, she is not doctrinaire or rigid,” said Brad Karp, chairman of law
firm Paul Weiss, who co-led a committee of lawyers across the country
who supported Ms. Harris during the primary. [Emphasis added]
Marc
Lasry, CEO of Avenue Capital Group, called Harris a “great” pick for
Biden. “She’s going to help Joe immensely. He picked the perfect
partner,” Lasry told CNBC.
Executives
at Citigroup and Centerview Partners made similar comments about Harris
to CNBC and the Journal, calling her a “great choice” and “direct but
constructive.”
Founder
of financial consulting firm Kynikos Associates Jim Chanos was elated
in an interview with Bloomberg over Harris joining Biden on the Democrat
ticket:
“She’s
terrific,” said Chanos, founder of Kynikos Associates. “She’s got force
of personality in a good way. She takes over a room. She certainly has a
charisma and a presence which will be an asset on the campaign.”
[Emphasis added]
Harris
is no stranger to praise from Wall Street executives. In the 2019
Democrat presidential primary, Harris won over a number of financial
industry donors, even holding a fundraiser in Iowa that was backed by
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
While criticizing “the people who have the most” in Democrat primary debates, Harris raked in
thousands in campaign cash from financial executives from firms such as
the Blackstone Group, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs,
and Wells Fargo.
This month, the New York Times admitted the “wallets of Wall Street are with Joe Biden” in a gushing headline about the financial industry’s opposition to Trump:
Financial
industry cash flowing to Mr. Biden and outside groups supporting him
shows him dramatically out-raising the president, with $44 million
compared with Mr. Trump’s $9 million.
Harris’s
views on trade and immigration, two of the most consequential issues to
Wall Street, are in lockstep with financial executives’ objective to
grow profit margins and add consumers to the market.
On
trade, Harris has balked at Trump’s imposition of tariffs on foreign
imports from China, Mexico, Canada, and Europe — using the neoliberal argument that
tariffs should not be used to pressure foreign countries to buy more
American-made goods and serve as only a tax on taxpayers.
Likewise,
the Biden-Harris plan for national immigration policy — which seeks to
drive up legal and illegal immigration levels to their highest levels in
decades — offers a flooded labor market with low wages for U.S. workers
and increased bargaining power for big business that has long been
supported by Wall Street.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.
Sold Out: How High-Tech Billionaires & Bipartisan Beltway Crapweasels Are ScrewingAmerica's Best & Brightest
By Michelle Malkin and John Miano
Hardcover, ISBN: 1501115944, $16.80
http://smile.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1501115944/centerforimmigra
Kindle, 10644 KB, ASIN: B00VBW3SYQ, $14.99
Book Description:
The #1 New York Times bestselling author and firebrand syndicated
columnist Michelle Malkin sets her sights on the corrupt businessmen,
politicians, and lobbyists flooding our borders and selling out
America’s best and brightest workers.
In Sold
Out, Michelle Malkin and John Miano reveal the worst perpetrators
screwing America’s high-skilled workers, how and why they’re doing
it—and what we must do to stop them. In this book, they will name names
and expose the lies of those who pretend to champion the middle class,
while aiding and abetting massive layoffs of highly skilled American
workers in favor of cheap foreign labor. Malkin and Miano will explode
some of the most commonly told myths spread in the media like these:
Lie #1: America is suffering from an apocalyptic “shortage” of science, technology, engineering, and math workers.
Lie
#2: US companies cannot function without an unlimited injection of the
most “highly skilled” and “highly educated” foreign workers, who offer
intellectual capital and entrepreneurial energy that American workers
can’t match.
Lie
#3: America’s best and brightest talents are protected because
employers are required to demonstrate that they’ve made every effort to
hire American citizens before resorting to foreign labor.
For too long, open-borders tech billionaires and their political
enablers have escaped tough public scrutiny of their means and
motives. Sold Out is an indictment of not only political corruption
in Washington, but also the journalistic malpractice that enables it.
It’s time to trade the whitewash for solvent. American workers
deserve better and the public deserves the unvarnished truth.
Tech Elites Endorse Joe Biden to Secure More Foreign Workers for U.S. Jobs
JOHN BINDER
Tech
industry elites have endorsed Democrat presidential candidate Joe
Biden, citing their opposition to President Trump’s efforts to
prioritize Americans for high-paying tech jobs in the United States.
Twenty-four
winners of the Turing Award, considered the Nobel Peace Prize for
computer science, have endorsed Biden on the premise that the former
vice president will allow the tech industry to import more foreign
workers, specifically those on H-1B visas, to fill coveted U.S. jobs.
The list includes
Google executive Vinton Cerf, Pixar executive Ed Catmull, Facebook
executive Yann LeCun, and Alphabet executive John Hennessy.
“Information
technology is thoroughly globalized. Academic computer science
departments attract talented students, many of whom immigrate and become
American inventors and captains of industry,” the executives and
industry insiders wrote in their endorsement of Biden:
We
celebrate open source projects, the lifeblood of our field, as
exemplars of international collaboration. Computer Science is at its
best when its learnings and discoveries are shared freely in the spirit
of progress. These core values helped make America a leader in
information technology, so vital in this Information Age. Joe Biden and
Kamala Harris listen to experts before setting public policy, essential
when science and technology may help with many problems facing our
nation today. As American computer scientists and as US citizens, we
enthusiastically endorse Joe Biden for President and Kamala Harris for
Vice President. [Emphasis added]
Since
mass unemployment hit the U.S., spurred by the Chinese coronavirus
crisis, Trump signed an executive order halting a number of visa
programs including the H-1B visa. Likewise, the Trump administration is
eyeing H-1B visa reforms that would more effectively weed out the
business model of outsourcing that has allowed American workers to be
replaced by foreign H-1B visa workers.
In August, billion dollar tech corporations such as Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Twitter signed onto a
U.S. Chamber of Commerce lawsuit against Trump’s executive order —
arguing that they have a right to import foreign workers to fill U.S.
jobs.
Unlike Trump, Biden has promised to increase the number of foreign H-1B visa workers that tech corporations will be able to import every year. The practice is a boon to tech executives.
There are about 650,000 H-1B visa workers in the U.S. at any given moment. Americans are often laid off in the process and forced to train their foreign replacements, as highlighted by
Breitbart News. More than 85,000 Americans annually potentially lose
their jobs to foreign labor through the H-1B visa program.
Analysis conducted in 2018 discovered that 71 percent of
tech workers in Silicon Valley, California, are foreign-born, while the
tech industry in the San Francisco, Oakland, and Hayward area is made
up of 50 percent foreign-born tech workers. Up to 99 percent of H-1B visa workers imported by the top eight outsourcing firms are from India.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.
Mark Zuckerberg: ‘There Is a Risk of Civil Unrest Across the Country’
LUCAS NOLAN
Facebook
CEO Mark Zuckerberg told analysts on a recent conference call with
analysts that he believes there could be “civil unrest” across the
country following the presidential election.
ZDNet reports that
during a conference call with analysts, Facebook founder and CEO Mark
Zuckerberg stated that the social media giant plants to post notices at
the top of users’ news feeds on November 3 discrediting claims by either
U.S. presidential candidate that they have won the election if the site
deems the announcement premature.
Zuckerberg
stated: “If any candidate or campaign tries to declare victory before
the final results are called, we will put a notification to the top of
People’s Facebook and Instagram feed letting them know the results
aren’t final yet and we’ll put an informational label on the candidate’s
post.”
Zuckerberg
added that Facebook was taking the initiative as “There is a risk of
civil unrest across the country, and given this, companies like ours
need to go well beyond what we’ve done before.”
Discussing
Facebook’s various efforts around the election, Zuckerberg stated that
the site “helped 4.4 million people register [to vote] exceeding the
goal that we set for ourselves this summer.”
Facebook
has also paused all new political ads on its site for this week,
Zuckerberg commented on this stating: “We’re doing this because while I
generally believe that the best antidote to bad speech is more speech,
in the final days of an election, there may simply not be enough time to
contest new claims.”
Breitbart News recently reported that Facebook revealed in a blog post that
a number of political ads were “improperly” restricted due to a
technical error as the company attempted to prevent new political ads
from being posted ahead of the November 3 election. Facebook stated that
“technical flaws” caused a number of ads to be “paused improperly.”
Facebook
stated that it has “implemented changes to fix these issues” and most
of the advertisements were now running without any issues. Facebook
stopped accepting new ads related to political issues on Tuesday and
stated that it would allow pre-existing ads to run during that period
but would block any adjustments to the ads’ content or design.
Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship. Follow him on Twitter @LucasNolan or email him at lnolan@breitbart.com
Sen Kamala Harris is a product of Silicon Valley's billionaires and will enforce their agenda in DC.
Eg,
she's an author of the S.386 bill that allows the Fortune 500 to hire
more white-collar workers from India for jobs needed by America's
college grads https://t.co/gKCuD9DH5z
— Neil Munro (@NeilMunroDC) August 12, 2020
In today's election, yours is a choice between
freedom and globalism
By Mark Christian
I
know something about both freedom and globalism. What I know is that
you cannot have both, which is why I immigrated to America, the world's
last stronghold of freedom.
In the way of background, I grew up in a prominent Muslim family in Egypt and became an imam at an early age. Like
Christianity, Islam is a global religion. Unlike Christianity, Islam
imposes an imperial global vision on true believers and denies them
freedom of thought and movement.
Progressive
globalism does much the same. Although Islam and progressivism would
seem to have nothing in common, they do share one overriding goal: the
need to crush traditional American Christianity, the one obstacle to
world dominance in either case. At some point, Islam and progressivism
will part ways, but for now, they are content to "coexist."
Progressive
leaders turn a blind eye to the slaughter of Christians at a church in
France or the shooting of a priest in another church or the beheading of
a French teacher for daring to show a picture of Mohammed, the prophet
of Islam. In countries like France, leftists have been responsible for
as much church vandalism as Muslims, maybe more. For now, the left and
Islam are allies. The result of the failed immigration policies and the
rabid push of atheism by most European governments has made their
combined mayhem possible.
The
mayhem has been papered over with lies, which is why Joe Biden makes
such a perfect front man for the global elites. Biden has lied about
almost everything in his life. Where to begin?
Biden lied about his undergraduate degree and his majors, lied about his rank in law school, lied about
scholarships and educational aid he had received, lied about his
stance toward the Vietnam war while in college, lied about his
plagiarism of other politician's writings and speeches, lied about the
circumstances around his first wife's fatal accident, lied about how he
met his second and current wife, and lied about the affair they were
having when they were both married.
Joe Biden is the embodiment of the dark side of
American politics.
When
the Vietnam war ended, and our troops needed funding to evacuate
gracefully, Joe Biden stood in the way. His obstruction led to Saigon's
fall and the disgraceful flight of American troops and personnel off
the American embassy's rooftop in Vietnam.
When
President Ford pleaded with Congress to help the Vietnamese refugees,
the ones who were aiding Americans during the war, Joe Biden stood in
the way. Even though many of these refugees were orphan children, Joe
Biden called them criminals and prostitutes on the Senate floor.
Most recently and dramatically, Biden lied
about his knowledge of his son's shady dealings,
lied about his own involvement in corruption
and bribery, and lied about his current
presidential agenda and what he wants to
implement in regards to energy, fracking, court-
packing, health care, education, and COVID
among other issues.
Biden has lied about so much that I am not sure if he ever told the truth or is now even capable of doing so. Thanks to Big Tech's and Big Media's suppression of his record, he can present himself as a man of character and high morals. We must feel sorry for the multitude of gullible Americans who believe him.
Do
not be a fool and believe for a second that the elites hate Trump
because of his tweets or because he is allegedly a sexist, a rapist, a
racist, or a foreign agent. Nor do they hate him because of the
pandemic death toll.
In
reality, the elites hate Trump because of "YOU," because you elected a
man they did not nominate and could not control. I have never seen
global anticipation for an American election like this one. The world
is watching. The progressive and Islamic elites are pulling for Biden,
but lovers of freedom all over the world are quietly cheering for
Trump. If you have yet to vote, be sure to vote today and give them
something to cheer about.
Image: Biden the globalist by Andrea Widburg.
Likewise, the Biden-Harris plan for national
immigration policy — which seeks to drive up
legal and illegal immigration levels to their
highest levels in decades — offers a flooded
labor market with low wages for U.S. workers
and increased bargaining power for big
business that has long been supported by Wall
Street.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.
Tech Elites Endorse Joe Biden to Secure More Foreign Workers for U.S. Jobs
JOHN BINDER
Tech
industry elites have endorsed Democrat presidential candidate Joe
Biden, citing their opposition to President Trump’s efforts to
prioritize Americans for high-paying tech jobs in the United States.
Twenty-four
winners of the Turing Award, considered the Nobel Peace Prize for
computer science, have endorsed Biden on the premise that the former
vice president will allow the tech industry to import more foreign
workers, specifically those on H-1B visas, to fill coveted U.S. jobs.
The list includes
Google executive Vinton Cerf, Pixar executive Ed Catmull, Facebook
executive Yann LeCun, and Alphabet executive John Hennessy.
“Information
technology is thoroughly globalized. Academic computer science
departments attract talented students, many of whom immigrate and become
American inventors and captains of industry,” the executives and
industry insiders wrote in their endorsement of Biden:
We
celebrate open source projects, the lifeblood of our field, as
exemplars of international collaboration. Computer Science is at its
best when its learnings and discoveries are shared freely in the spirit
of progress. These core values helped make America a leader in
information technology, so vital in this Information Age. Joe Biden and
Kamala Harris listen to experts before setting public policy, essential
when science and technology may help with many problems facing our
nation today. As American computer scientists and as US citizens, we
enthusiastically endorse Joe Biden for President and Kamala Harris for
Vice President. [Emphasis added]
Since
mass unemployment hit the U.S., spurred by the Chinese coronavirus
crisis, Trump signed an executive order halting a number of visa
programs including the H-1B visa. Likewise, the Trump administration is
eyeing H-1B visa reforms that would more effectively weed out the
business model of outsourcing that has allowed American workers to be
replaced by foreign H-1B visa workers.
In August, billion dollar tech corporations such as
Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Twitter signed onto a
U.S.
Chamber of Commerce lawsuit against Trump’s executive order — arguing
that they have a right to import foreign workers to fill U.S. jobs.
Unlike Trump, Biden has promised to increase the number of foreign H-1B visa workers that tech corporations will be able to import every year. The practice is a boon to tech executives.
There are about 650,000 H-1B visa workers in the U.S. at any given moment. Americans are often laid off in the process and forced to train their foreign replacements, as highlighted by
Breitbart News. More than 85,000 Americans annually potentially lose
their jobs to foreign labor through the H-1B visa program.
Analysis conducted in 2018 discovered that 71 percent of
tech workers in Silicon Valley, California, are foreign-born, while the
tech industry in the San Francisco, Oakland, and Hayward area is made
up of 50 percent foreign-born tech workers. Up to 99 percent of H-1B visa workers imported by the top eight outsourcing firms are from India.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.
More than 85,000 Americans annually potentially lose their jobs to foreign labor through the H-1B visa program.
Analysis conducted in 2018 discovered that 71 percent of
tech workers in Silicon Valley, California, are foreign-born, while the
tech industry in the San Francisco, Oakland, and Hayward area is made
up of 50 percent foreign-born tech workers. Up to 99 percent of H-1B visa workers imported by the top eight outsourcing firms are from India. JOHN BINDER
An emerging Silicon Valley-Homeless Industrial Complex power struggle in San Francisco?
By Monica Showalter
Something
about the apparently random street murder of Silicon Valley tech
executive Bob Lee seems to have overturned a crawly rock in San
Francisco's political scene, suggesting a brewing power struggle on the
horizon.
On
the one hand, we have a very vocally angry Silicon Valley tech
community speaking out about the out-of-control crime situation in the
city with the very valued and talented Lee's untimely death from some
night creature who crawled out from some sewer or encampment and stabbed
him to death, quite possibly in a drug-addled haze. That's expected if
you live in a place full of bums and criminals, but Lee didn't live in a
place full of bums and criminals. He had actually fled the city for
Florida based on its engulfing crime, and came back only for a brief
business trip.
On
the other hand, we have a soggy, entrenched political establishment
seeking to assure that there's really no crime problem at all. This is
evident enough in the "crime is down" coverage seen in the political
establishment's house organ, the San Francisco Chronicle, and in the
surreal statements of the city hall power establishment, which is
rooted in special interests, particularly the most powerful one, the
homeless industrial complex. I wrote about that here. San Francisco currently spends about as much on homeless "services," as it actually does on police, and by some studies such as the one cited below, actually more.
Not
surprisingly, as per Thomas Sowell's observation, you can have all the
poverty you want to pay for, and San Francisco pays a lot.
The Hoover Institution's Lee Ohanian has noted:
Spending
$1.1 billion on homelessness is just the latest installment in San
Francisco’s constant failure to sensibly and humanely deal with an issue
that it chronically misdiagnoses and mismanages about as much as is
humanly possible. Since fiscal year 2016–17, San Francisco has spent
over $2.8 billion on homelessness, and the city’s politicians remain
seemingly baffled, year after year, as the number of homeless in the
city skyrocket, as opioid overdoses kill more than COVID-19, and as the
city has become nearly the most dangerous in the country.
https://www.hoover.org/research/why-san-francisco-nearly-most-crime-ridden-city-us.
Since
2016, the number of homeless in San Francisco has increased from 12,249
to 19,086, which comes out to about $57,000 in spending per homeless
person per year. With a total population of about 860,000, roughly 2.2
percent of San Francisco residents are homeless, which is over 12 times
the national average. There is little doubt that as San Francisco spends
more, homelessness and its impact on the city worsens.
Do
the homeless get that $57,000 being spent on them? Of course not. The
princelings of the NGO establishments got that money -- for themselves.
That's what's made them politically powerful, enough to call the shots
at city hall.
Meanwhile,
the tech barons keep the city afloat through their taxes paid which in
turn pays for the city's homeless services -- which fuels the
homelessness. The taxes they pay are the highest in the nation, (which naturally, the Chronicle claims don't matter to
the tech companies, but is unlikely to be true). We also know that
they're not happy now that the crime that coincides with the growth
of the homeless-industrial complex has spiraled into their tech talent
base. It's not just Lee's murder, though that's not small. It's that
ordinary tech workers don't want to return to the offices. The tech
firms have leases in those buildings and need to utilize that paid-for
space. The workers don't want to return and many have fled to
friendlier, less crime-infested climes in Texas, Washington state, and
Florida. That's leaving San Francisco with a lot of empty office space --
about a 30% vacancy rate -- which is one of the country's highest --
and a 30% drop in tax revenues, given that the city finances itself by a
huge margin through property taxes.
The collision of political interests happened when one of the city's criminals preyed on tech royalty Bob Lee.
Then we started seeing posts like this, from tech-baron-of-tech-barons, Elon Musk:
And
this not-so-disguised shot at the San Francisco Chronicle with all its
bogus claims about crime being down based on misread statistics:
And this simple brutal one:
Those sound like shots across the bow.
And of course, Musk is a bugbear to the left, but he's the biggest bear in the tech establishment
Over
at city hall, the political establishment is knee-deep in the NGOs and
depends on them to mainstain their political power. But they also depend
on the tech barons for money to pay the NGOs.
The
tech barons are mad and based on Musk's tweets, now seem to be looking
to get rid of them. They're on the warpath. They were the moneybags
behind the ouster of far-left district attorney Chesa Boudin last year.
Now based on this string of events, they may be getting ready to storm
the deep-blue fortress. Lee's death may have been the starting point,
and Musk's recent tweets may be the accelerator.
Image: Wikipedia // public domain
A Homeless Village Is Growing on Apple’s Silicon Valley Property
LUCAS NOLAN
According
to recent reports, a growing homeless encampment has been set up on
dozens of acres of undeveloped land in the heart of Silicon Valley owned
by tech giant Apple.
VICE News reports that
despite Apple committing billions of dollars to fix California’s
housing crisis, an encampment of homeless people living in RVs, shacks,
and tents has taken over dozens of acres of undeveloped land owned by
Apple in the center of Silicon Valley.
Between
30 to 100 homeless people have reportedly set up camp on the property
owned by Apple in North San Jose. The area covers about 55 acres
according to the local CBS affiliate KPIX.
Some current residents of the site say that they feel they can be left
alone there, despite the area’s proximity to PayPal’s corporate
headquarters and other office buildings.
Before
the start of the coronavirus pandemic, around 6,000 homeless people
lived in San Jose with fewer than 1,000 beds available to them. It’s
common for homeless people living outdoors and in vehicles across the
Bay Area to be moved from place to place by security and police, those
staying on the Apple property have largely been left alone according to
Renee Corona who has lived in an RV on the property for nearly two
years.
Corona,
who receives disability payments but cannot afford to live in San
Francisco where she was raised, stated: “This is an area where you’re
secluded from the city. I don’t think a lot of people knew about this.”
She added: “I’m grateful that they don’t kick us out. I just want to say
thank you. They don’t bother us.”
San
Jose City Council member David Cohen, whose district includes the
property, told VICE News that his office is trying to schedule a meeting
with Apple to discuss the site. “We’re setting up a meeting so that I
can begin to talk to them about what we might be able to do to help the
people who are living there, and to figure out some plan for offering
services,” Cohen said.
Read more at VICE News here.
Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship. Follow him on Twitter @LucasNolan or contact via secure email at the address lucasnolan@protonmail.com
THESE ARE THE PEOPLE WHO IMPORTED INDIANS BE THE BOATLOADS FOR DECADES!
Report: Facebook to Cut Thousands of Jobs in Latest Corporate Downsizing
Reuters
February 22, 2023
(Reuters)—Facebook-parent
Meta Platforms Inc is planning a fresh round of job cuts in a
reorganization and downsizing effort that could affect thousands of
workers, the Washington Post reported on Wednesday.
The company did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
Last
year, the social media giant said it will let go of 13% of its
workforce, or more than 11,000 employees, as it grappled with soaring
costs and a weak advertising market.
Meta
plans to push some leaders into lower-level roles without direct
reports, flattening the layers of management between top boss Mark
Zuckerberg and the company's interns, the Washington Post reported,
citing a person familiar with the matter.
(Reporting by Eva Mathews in Bengaluru; Editing by Devika Syamnath)
Analysis conducted last year reveal that 71 percent of tech workers in
Silicon Valley are foreign-born, while the tech industry in the San
Francisco, Oakland, and Hayward area is made up of 50 percent
foreign-born tech workers.
Despite
his Wall Street, big business, Big Tech, and billionaire donations,
Biden has attempted to portray himself as a small-town fighter from
Scranton, Pennsylvania
By
failures of border security, a lack of the enforcement of our
immigration laws from within the interior of the United States and huge numbers of visas for high tech workers, the
lives and livelihoods of Americans and their children, are being stolen
by America’s corrupt political elite who are doing the bidding of those
who provide them with huge “Campaign Contributions” (Orwellian
euphemism for bribes) pursue legislation that is diametrically opposed
to the best interests of America and Americans.
MICHAEL CUTLER
State and Local Politicians Move to Grant Coronavirus Relief to Illegal Aliens
By Matthew Tragesser
ImmigrationReform.com
https://www.immigrationreform.com/2020/04/08/illegal-alien-benefits-states-immigrationreform-com/
Study: More than 7-in-10 California Immigrant
Welfare
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/12/04/study-more-than-7-in-10-california-immigrant-households-are-on-welfare/
More than 7-in-10 households headed by immigrants in the state of California are on taxpayer-funded welfare, a new study reveals.
The latest Census Bureau data analyzed by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS)
finds that about 72 percent of households headed by noncitizens and
immigrants use one or more forms of taxpayer-funded welfare programs in
California — the number one immigrant-receiving state in the U.S.
Meanwhile, only about 35 percent of households headed by native-born Americans use welfare in California.
All
four states with the largest foreign-born populations, including
California, have extremely high use of welfare by immigrant households.
In Texas, for example, nearly 70 percent of households headed by
immigrants use taxpayer-funded welfare. Meanwhile, only about 35 percent
of native-born households in Texas are on welfare.
In
New York and Florida, a majority of households headed by immigrants and
noncitizens are on welfare. Overall, about 63 percent of immigrant
households use welfare while only 35 percent of native-born households
use welfare.
President Trump’s administration is looking to soon implement a policy that protects American taxpayers’ dollars from
funding the mass importation of welfare-dependent foreign nationals by
enforcing a “public charge” rule whereby legal immigrants would be less
likely to secure a permanent residency in the U.S. if they have used any
forms of welfare in the past, including using Obamacare, food stamps,
and public housing.
The immigration controls would be a boon for American taxpayers in the form of an annual $57.4 billion tax cut —
the amount taxpayers spend every year on paying for the welfare, crime,
and schooling costs of the country’s mass importation of 1.5 million
new, mostly low-skilled legal immigrants.
As Breitbart News reported, the majority of the more than 1.5 million foreign nationals entering the country every year use about 57
percent more food stamps than the average native-born American
household. Overall, immigrant households consume 33 percent more cash
welfare than American citizen households and 44 percent more in Medicaid
dollars. This straining of public services by a booming 44 million foreign-born population translates to the average immigrant household costing American taxpayers $6,234 in federal welfare.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.
Study: Amnesty Will Cost ‘Hundreds of Billions’
NEIL MUNRO
President
Joe Biden’s amnesty plan will spike Social Security spending by
“hundreds of billions” over the next few decades, according to a
forecast by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS).
The February 22 report, titled “Amnesty Would Cost the Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds Hundreds of Billions of Dollars,” says:
The new taxes
paid by the average amnesty recipient amount to only half of the
$94,500 noted above. The net effect of amnesty is therefore $140,330 [in
Social Security benefits] minus $47,250 [in paid taxes], which is about
$93,000 per recipient. In any large-scale amnesty, in which millions of
illegal immigrants gain legal status, it is easy to see how the net
cost could reach into the hundreds of billions of dollars.
The
predicted $93,000 per person cost would be a financial burden for
taxpayers — but would be a giveaway to business groups because the
Social Security payments will be converted into purchases of consumer
products, healthcare services, medical drugs, apartments, and food.
At
least 11 million people — perhaps 20 million — are living illegally in
the United States. The number rises as people overstay their visas,
evade deportation orders, or sneak over the border — but it also falls
as some migrants get deported, leave, or find ways to get green cards
via the rolling “Adjustment of Status” process.
But
taxpayers’ expenses are also economic gains for business groups and
investors. In January 2020, a coalition of business groups sued deputies for President Donald Trump after he reduced the inflow of poor migrants into the U.S. consumer market, saying:
Because
[green-card applicants] will receive fewer public benefits under the
Rule, they will cut back their consumption of goods and services,
depressing demand throughout the economy …
The
New American Economy Research Fund calculates that, on top of the $48
billion in income that is earned by individuals who will be affected by
the Rule—and that will likely be removed from the U.S. economy—the Rule
will cause an indirect economic loss of more than $33.9 billion …
Indeed, the Fiscal Policy Institute has estimated that the decrease in
SNAP and Medicaid enrollment under the Rule could, by itself, lead to
economic ripple effects of anywhere between $14.5 and $33.8 billion,
with between approximately 100,000 and 230,000 jobs lost … Health
centers alone would be forced to drop as many as 6,100 full-time medical
staff.
CIS promised a more detailed report:
This
is just a rough estimate. We are currently working on a detailed model
that will provide more precise costs for both Social Security and
Medicare. Again, however, any reasonable calculation will produce a
large cost, simply because amnesty will convert so many outside
contributors into actual beneficiaries.
For years, a wide variety of pollsters have shown deep and broad opposition to labor migration and to the inflow of temporary contract workers into jobs sought by young U.S. graduates.
The multiracial, cross-sex, non-racist, class-based, intra-Democratic, and solidarity-themed opposition to labor migration coexists with generally favorable personal feelings toward legal immigrants and toward immigration in theory — despite the media magnification of many skewed polls and articles that still push the 1950’s corporate “Nation of Immigrants” claim.
The deep public opposition is built on the widespread recognition that migration moves money from employees to employers, from families to investors, from young to old, from children to their parents, from homebuyers to real estate investors, and from the central states to the coastal states.
However,
Biden’s officials have been broadcasting their desire to change border
policies to help extract more migrants from Central America for the U.S.
economy. On February 19, for example, deputies of DHS Secretary
Alejandro Mayorkas posted a tweet offering support to migrants illegally
working in the United States and to migrants who may wish to live in
the United States.
We'll get 1 million-plus Biden migrants this year, warns ex-Obama/DHS official now at Harvard.
The
warning includes a weak criticism of the ethnic lobbies &
open-borders progressives who are undermining an Ivy League giveaway in
the amnesty bill.#H1B https://t.co/RqZBEGcxKO
— Neil Munro (@NeilMunroDC) February 22, 2021
Biden’s HHS Nominee Does Not Rule Out Taxpayer-Funded Healthcare for Illegal Aliens
JOHN BINDER
President
Joe Biden’s nominee to lead the Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS), California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, dodged a question on
whether he would push to provide American taxpayer-funded healthcare
benefits to illegal aliens.
This
week, during a hearing before the Senate Finance Committee, Becerra was
asked by Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) about his previous support for
decriminalizing illegal immigration and providing illegal aliens with
taxpayer-funded healthcare benefits.
Becerra,
though, dodged the question by saying he would follow the parameters of
the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare, which he said
allows “very rare” cases of illegal aliens to receive benefits.
The exchange went as follows:
DAINES: You’re on record for pushing for allowing illegal immigrants to receive taxpayer-funded healthcare and
for decriminalizing illegal entry into the United States. This coupled
with President Biden’s radical plan for granting citizenship to those
who are here illegally would potentially lead to hundreds of thousands,
if not potentially millions, more people flooding into our country.
[Emphasis added]
As you know, in 2016, California passed a law requiring covered Californians to apply for … waivers to allow illegal immigrants to purchase health insurance in the marketplace. This waiver was withdrawn after President Trump’s election. [Emphasis added]
My question is this: Will
you attempt to use the waiver authority contained in the Affordable
Care Act to grant healthcare benefits to illegal immigrants? [Emphasis added]
BECERRA: Senator, I can tell you that where the law, as it stands now as I see it, it does not allow those who are unauthorized in this country to receive taxpayer-paid benefits except in very rare circumstances and
it will be my job to make sure that we are following and enforcing the
law. And I can commit to you that that is what we will do. [Emphasis
added]
In a letter to Biden, 11 Senate Republicans and 64 House Republicans asked the president to withdraw Becerra’s
nomination to be HHS Secretary, citing his support for taxpayer-funded
healthcare benefits for illegal aliens, among other issues.
“Mr.
Becerra seeks to decriminalize illegal immigration, which would extend
expensive government benefits like Medicaid to anyone who illegally
crosses our borders,” the letter states.
A Politico report this week suggested Becerra is eyeing plans to provide illegal aliens with taxpayer-funded healthcare benefits should he lead HHS.
“He’s
one of those individuals that had exceedingly deep convictions about
the need to cover the undocumented individuals in all of our
communities,” former Rep. Charles Gonzalez (D-TX) told Politico of
Becerra.
Should
Becerra become HHS Secretary, he could let illegal aliens onto
Obamacare exchanges while pressuring states to pursue similar policies
to those in California. Likewise, Becerra could open Obamacare exchanges
to particular subgroups of illegal aliens, like those enrolled in the
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.
As Breitbart News reported, forcing taxpayers to provide healthcare to all illegal aliens would cost citizens anywhere between $23 billion to $66 billion every
single year — potentially a $660 billion bill for taxpayers every
decade, without adjusting for inflation and the increasing number of
illegal aliens.
Cost is only the first issue facing taxpayers. Medical experts have admitted providing
healthcare to illegal aliens would ensure a never-ending flood of
illegal aliens arriving at the southern border with “serious health
problems” and local hospitals would have to cover the costs.
Already, taxpayers are forced to subsidize about $18.5
billion of yearly medical costs for illegal aliens living in the U.S.,
according to estimates by Chris Conover, formerly of the Center for
Health Policy and Inequalities Research at Duke University.
When U.S. voters were polled by CNN on
the issue in July 2019, nearly 6-in-10 said they were opposed to such a
policy, including 63 percent of swing voters and 61 percent of
self-described “moderates.”
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.
No comments:
Post a Comment