It Doesn’t Matter Who the Democrat Nominee Is
From the moment Joe Biden illegitimately took office, whispers about whether he would run again in 2024 began. Biden himself even said the quiet part out loud by saying California governor Gavin Newsom could soon “have the job I’m looking for.” Most Democrat party elites have remained steadfast in their support for Biden verbally despite his infamous gaffes becoming even more common than they were when he first took office.
Recently however, something changed.
Special Counsel Robert Hur’s report on Biden’s mishandling of classified documents was damning, even for those previously aware of Biden’s cognitive deficiencies. It claimed that Biden’s memory is “significantly limited,” as evidenced by his inability to recall noteworthy dates such as when he served as vice president and the death of his son. As a result, Hillary Clinton pivoted from her previously unequivocal support of Biden by stating she believes that his age is an issue, which signaled a shift from the usually united party apparatus and furthered the Biden replacement theory.
If that happens, talking points have surely already been issued. Democrats, media, and the vocal anti-Trump minority of the Republican party — which includes the cast of bitter primary candidates Trump soundly defeated — are prepared to admit that Trump would have beaten Biden, but only because it will make them appear impartial when they say he will lose to the new Democrat nominee. Regardless of how this plays out, one thing remains true: it doesn’t matter who the Democrat nominee will be.
Many now believe that there is a person or group controlling Joe Biden, and with good reason. If an illegal shadow government is reigning, the logical expectation would be for its administrators to choose the next puppet to carry out their agenda, meaning a vote for whomever the Democrats nominate is a vote for a continuation of this agenda. While Biden’s poor record makes him vulnerable, we shouldn’t expect any other Democrat to be viewed very differently. In fact, all of the most rumored replacements, Michelle Obama, Gavin Newsom, and Kamala Harris, have their own unique way of attaining unpopularity.
While Michelle Obama would be their ideal choice, so Barack would no longer have to lurk in the shadows, since 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue would once again become his residence, the Obama popularity has been on a steady downtrend since 2008. Barack became the only president to ever win re-election by a smaller popular and Electoral College vote margin than he did previously. His coattails were also not long enough to propel Hillary Clinton to victory on his way out of office in 2016, due in large part to the estimated 13 percent of Obama voters who switched to Trump. And 2020 was, well, 2020. With a staggering 78 percent of Americans believing we are heading in the wrong direction, there is no reason to believe that the spouse of the person widely believed to be responsible for this destruction would perform well in a general election, not to mention that most of the children whose school lunches were ruined because of Michelle are of voting age now.
While Michelle has the name recognition, Gavin Newsom is the one most indiscreetly positioning himself to replace Biden. However, he governs the state that has become a case study for what happens under radical-left rule. Unsurprisingly, California has experienced a population exodus under his reign, demonstrating a rejection of the leftist agenda even among those living in blue states. Further, an absolute necessity for a successful campaign is securing hometown support, yet Newsom had to fight a recall campaign earlier in his term. If a candidate is unpopular among voters who know him best, it is a bad omen when trying to persuade new voters to support him.
Another Californian, Kamala Harris is also mentioned in these hypothetical conversations, mostly due to her being “next in line” as opposed to her electability. In fact, she is arguably the least popular rumored replacement. Prior to taking office, she was rated the most liberal senator, which the California exodus has proven is very unpopular. Now a “star” of the Biden-Harris show, she wears the stain of many of that administration’s failures, specifically for her shortcomings as the “border czar.” Her incessant cackling and elementary-level form of communicating have also contributed to her approval rating being even lower than Biden’s.
Since all of these rumored replacements would merely serve as a continuation of the current agenda, we must assess the perception of the party instead of the nominee. All indications show cracks in the foundation, especially for a party that rarely displays any sign of disunity.
A fascinating trend has emerged over the past year. Numerous members of pop culture who historically leaned staunchly left or down the middle have voiced a discontentment with Biden and, even more shocking, an openness to Trump. Nobody ever imagined Trump-haters like Snoop Dogg, Michael Rappaport, Bill Maher, Cardi B, and Charlamagne Tha God doing anything that could be used to aid Trump or hurt Biden. Yet recently, Maher, Cardi B, and Charlamagne have all criticized Biden, while Snoop Dogg and Rappaport extended an unprovoked olive branch to Trump. Other high-profile former Democrat voters such as Elon Musk and Joe Rogan also stated their preference for Trump over Biden. The “average” American always feels the flaws in government before those with unworldly riches do. These figures openly voicing discontentment means that this sentiment reached the average Democrat and independent long ago and is now prevalent in elite circles.
Additionally, third-party candidates siphoning Democrat votes will remain an obstacle, regardless of who the Democrat nominee is. All three declared “third-party” candidates — Robert F. Kennedy. Jr.; Jill Stein; and Cornell West — will overwhelmingly siphon votes from the Democrat, as they all advocate for leftist causes. Polling including all three of these candidates in addition to Trump and Biden typically shows them accumulating a total of 10–15 percent of support, demonstrating a hunger from left-leaning voters to move away from the Democrat party. Unsurprisingly, Trump wins in all of these polls, which is telling, since all will likely be on the ballot come November.
Beyond this election being solely a referendum on the left, it is also coming at a time of historic, record-breaking support for a candidate who already set voting records. Trump has statistically proven to be the most popular president in U.S. history by setting the Republican general election vote record in 2016, then setting the sitting president vote record in 2020. He is currently breaking all non-incumbent primary voting records and very well could surpass 100 million votes for the first time in American history. And if recent polling is even mildly accurate, Trump is poised to make historic inroads with typically non-Republican circles.
Trump’s original “deplorables” have remained firmly behind him throughout his time in politics as he continues to bring along new supporters. So if another radical leftist becomes the Democrat nominee, there is no reason to expect them to be able to separate themselves from the Democrat party’s reputation, overcome left-leaning third-party bids, and stop Trump’s expanding coalition.
At this point, only election fraud can defeat Trump. But if anyone can draw turnout that’s “too big to rig,” or that can “outvote the fraud,” it’s Donald Trump. In the event that Biden is in fact dispatched for an alternative, keep that in mind.
Matt Kane graduated from Stony Brook University with a Bachelor’s degree in political science. His work has been posted by President Trump and published by RealClearPolitics. Follow on Truth Social: @MattKane. X: @MattKaneUSA
Image: Gavin Newsom. Credit: Gage Skidmore via Flickr, CC BY-SA 2.0.
JOE BIDEN, GAVIN NEWSOM, ADAM SCHIFF, ALL SLUTS FOR RED CHINA!
America’s Destruction and the Ghosts of Revolutions Past
Have you ever been listening to someone talk and have déjà vu even though you’ve never seen or heard of the person speaking, and the interview you’re watching happened just a few hours before? I have. Once. Last week. Hint: It has to do with America’s destruction.
I was listening to Tucker interview Xi Van Fleet, a Chinese native who lived through the Cultural Revolution in China. She eventually immigrated to the United States, where she’s now lived for 40 years. Listening to her describe the beginnings of the Cultural Revolution and its eerie echoes here, I knew I’d heard something similar before.
And then it hit me: I had. Exactly 40 years ago, a defector from the Soviet Union, Yuri Bezmenov, gave an interview explaining how the KGB was using what it called Ideological Subversion to collapse the United States.
Now, these two interviews weren’t remotely the same. One was from a KGB operative, someone who was part of the Soviet system suppressing the Russian people and who became disillusioned and defected to the West, while the other was from someone who experienced the CCP’s suppression before immigrating to the US.
Nonetheless, although given exactly 40 years apart, the two interviews taken together paint a very stark picture of America today and going forward. They reminded me of a technique that is often recommended for effective public speaking: “Tell them what you’re going to tell them. Tell them. Then tell them what you’ve just told them.”
Bezmenov lays out the KGB’s plan—ideological subversion—for sowing America’s and Western Europe’s collapse. The plan involved four elements, which he carefully explained:
1) Demoralization—15-20 years to re-educate one generation.
This is done through uncritically introducing Marxist ideology into schools without counterbalancing it with basic American values, patriotism, and morals. Eventually, a significant segment of the population will become immune to accurate information.
2) Destabilization—2-5 years to destabilize a nation.
The goal is to destabilize the nation via the economy, foreign relations, and defense policy.
3) Crisis—as little as 6 weeks to bring a nation to crisis. (George Floyd, anyone?)
4) Normalization. For this, I’ll let Bezmenov’s words speak for themselves:
This is what will happen in the United States if you allow all the schumcks to bring the country to crisis, to promise people all kind of goodies and paradise on earth. To destabilize your economy and illuminate the principle of free market competition and to put a big brother government in Washington DC with benevolent dictators like Walter Mondale.
Your leftists in the United States, all the professors and the beautiful civil rights defenders, they are instrumental in the process of the subversion. Only to destabilize the nation. When their job is completed, they are not needed anymore. They know too much. Some of them, when they get disillusioned, when they see that Marxists / Leninists come power they get offended they think they will come to power. That will never happen of course. They will be lined up against the wall and shot.
That last sentence is particularly interesting because it’s exactly what Xi Van Fleet says happened in China…twice. The first involved the peasants who put Mao in power in the first place. They were repaid for their efforts by being chained to their farms, and, between 1958 and 1962, fifty million of them starved to death. Then, in 1969, three years after the Cultural Revolution began, Mao turned on his Red Guards. These were literally children who had been his stormtroopers. They were too unstable to keep around, so he either had the military kill them or he sent them to re-education camps.
AI Image created by Vince Coyner.
Xi’s story is a tragic one, but as she walks through it, you hear echoes of exactly what is happening in America today. After 16 years of brainwashing, Mao had his young Red Guards ready to terrorize the nation. They used violence and language control. Suddenly, propaganda was everywhere. Everything old had to be destroyed while law and order were dismantled. The police were told to stay out of the schools, which were the beating heart of the Revolution. Police also couldn’t respond if Red Guard members attacked them.
All this resembles how two generations of American students have been indoctrinated in the fiction of Climate Change and the gay and trans agendas, as well as the manipulation of language and discourse via the prohibition of words and ideas. Statues tying America to the past have been torn down. Add in the defund the police movement, the violence after George Floyd, and the lack of consequences for criminal behavior, and we have exactly what Bezmenov discussed and Xi described. Whether it’s climate activists, supporters of “Palestine” (AKA antisemites), LBTQXYZ123# harassers, or Antifa & BLM rampaging through cities, they’re all playing their parts in the play the KGB wrote, which Western communists adopted after the Berlin Wall collapsed.
What’s more, both refugees from tyranny discussed what America is becoming, he by predicting it and she by chronicling it. Whether it’s reporters being arrested, protesters sent to the gulag, or the regime using lawfare to harass its rich and/or popular opponents, the rules never apply to those in power. It’s not that there are no rules; they just don’t matter.
The Soviets had a constitution that guaranteed a wide variety of civil liberties, and the Chinese constitution guarantees “citizens of the People’s Republic of China enjoy freedom of speech, of the press, of assembly, of association, of procession, and of demonstration.” We have our Constitution, which currently provides about as much of a limit on government as a spaghetti strainer does on water.
The funny thing (as in, not really funny) about all of this is that the leftists who think they’re going to be running things once the crisis blossoms into a full-blown tyranny will likely be the first to go. Whether Stalin’s erstwhile supporters who fell in the Great Purge or the Chinese Red Guards who fell to the guns of the military, those who are at the vanguard of leftist revolutions often find themselves victims of the very powers they put in place.
As we watch powerlessly as our great cities devolve into crime-infested dystopian nightmares; George Soros-impelled DAs and prosecutors smile as they demonstrate their two-tiered legal system; the federal government actively subverts efforts to secure the border; cities cut services to citizens and veterans to give illegals billions; schools and hospitals and states empower the brainwashing and butchering of children; and the Uniparty in Washington runs up trillion dollar deficits and sends tens of billions to Ukraine, we begin to recognize what Bezmenov called Normalization.
A decade ago, Americans of most stripes would have understood that this was a disaster in the making. But now we’re told that all of it is not only normal, but you’re a racist, homophobic, transphobic white nationalist if you disagree with any of it.
The outcome in November will decide which path we take. The thing to remember when we walk into those voting booths is that Bezmenov and Xi had a place to escape to for freedom: America. We don’t have that luxury. Vote accordingly.
Follow Vince on Twitter at ImperfectUSA or you can visit his new website Gratitude for America.
The main objective of “political animals” like Obama and the Clintons is to get elected; it’s not to fix a broken America, nor to protect her. There are people who govern and there are people who campaign; Obama and the Clintons are the latter. Just look at the huge Republican electoral gains under Obama and the Clintons. It’s amazing that Democrats who still care about their party still support the very people who have brought it down.
JUST NOW: Biden is TOTALLY COMPROMISED by Communist China!
“Protect and enrich.” This is a perfect encapsulation of the Clinton Foundation (TWO GAMER LAWYERS - OWNED BY GEORGE SOROS) (WHAT ABOUT THE CHINA BIDEN PENN CENTER?) and the Obamas (TWO GAMER LAWYERS - OWNED BY GEORGE SOROS) book and television deals. Then there is the Biden family (FOUR GAMER LAWYERS - JOE, HUNTER, JAMES, FRANK - OWNED BY GEORGE SOROS AND LARRY FINK OF BLACKROCK) corruption, followed closely behind by similar abuses of power and office by the (GAMER LYING LAWYER )Warren and Sanders families, as Peter Schweizer described in his recent book “Profiles in Corruption.” These names just scratch the surface of government corruption (ADD GAMER LAWYER KAMALA HARRIS (OWNED BY GEORGE SOROS) AND HER LAWYER HUSBAND AND THE BANKSTERS’ RENT BOY, (GAMER LAWYER) CHUCK SCHUMER, OWNED BY LARRY FINK OF BLACKROCK WHO OWNS A BIG PIECE OF THE ‘BIG GUY’ JOE, AND GEORGE SOROS’ RENT BOY (GAMER LAWYER) TONY BLINKEN, AS WELL AS CON MAN (GAMER LAWYER) ADAM SHIFF AND HIS CORRUPTNESS (GAMER LAWYER) BOB MENENDEZ STILL EVADING PRISON, AND NOT BE VERY LEAST, (GAMER LAWYER) ERIC SWALWELL, THE CHINESE SPY AND HO CHASING BRIBES SUCKER.
BRIAN C JOONDEPH
‘Blood Money’: Establishment Media Blame Republicans for Joe Biden’s Fentanyl Debacle
President Joe Biden’s deputies are trying to blame Republicans for his failure to slow the massive inflow of fentanyl through his semi-open southern border.
NBC News touted Biden’s campaign-year fentanyl pitch on Tuesday, which will likely be part of his Thursday State of the Union address.
“We do have technology that’s in the warehouse that has been tested — but we need approximately $300 million [to] actually put the technology in the ground,” claimed Troy Miller, the acting commission of the Customs and Border Protection agency. “It’s extremely frustrating,” he said in an article that was pushed by media companies to the top of newsfeeds nationwide.
The Democrat Party’s blame-shifting comes as investigative author Peter Schweizer has detailed China’s central role in the fentanyl drug disaster, which is killing roughly 70,000 young Americans each year — far more than the Vietnam War’s total death toll of 55,000.
“What everyone needs to understand is that China is the senior partner in the fentanyl trade to kill Americans, and the cartels are the junior partners … end-to-end, America’s fentanyl epidemic is a Chinese pipeline,” says Schweizer’s “Blood Money.”
Biden’s deputies are eager to use their drug crisis as a campaign club against former President Donald Trump, according to Jon Feere, a former top staffer in Trump’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency.
“There’s no doubt the Secretary of Homeland Security and people in the White House have the means to put together $300 million [by moving] it around from other departments,” he told Breitbart News.
They are “choosing not to spend [the $300 million] on these machines that allegedly would make a huge difference in the trafficking of fentanyl,” he added. Meanwhile, the administration is spending billions of dollars to welcome, feed, transport, and shelter Biden’s migrants throughout the United States.
RELATED: Migrants Waiting for Entry to Roosevelt Hotel
emorris“The fact that they are interested in using [the drug-detection machines] as a bargaining chip or a political tool suggests that they’re not all that serious about the importance of these machines,” Feere noted.
For months, Biden has been excusing his disastrous and unpopular migration policy by blaming the GOP, whose voters strongly oppose his mass migration priorities.
For example, in August and October, Biden asked for many billions of emergency dollars to run the “Northside Catch and Release Network,” which supports millions of migrants. The requests also asked for $416 million to speed up the deployment of the drug surveillance machines.
Since February, he has also blamed the GOP for blocking the open-borders “border security” bill that Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY), and Biden’s border chief, Alejandro Mayorkas, secretly developed.
GOP Senators shut down the bill once the pro-migration details were revealed. Those details included several billion dollars to bail out the “sanctuary cities” that are sheltering Biden’s migrants during the 2024 campaign.
But the bill also included roughly $400 million for the popular goal of installing more of the machines that can find hidden drugs in vehicles as they cross the border, NBC reported:
The new technology, known as Non-Intrusive Inspection, or NII, lets CBP X-ray a percentage of cars and trucks as they pass through the massive U-shaped screeners, which look something like car washes. Drivers don’t have to get out of their vehicles to be screened, which means traffic can keep flowing through border checkpoints with fewer interruptions.
NBC blamed the GOP for the administration’s failure to deploy the machines, saying:
But some of the equipment that has been purchased hasn’t yet been put into use, because Congress hasn’t allocated the funding needed to install it. The money to install the screeners was in the supplemental funding request Republicans blocked.
In a separate article, published Wednesday, NBC suggested Biden would try to blame the GOP for his many failures:
WASHINGTON — In his State of the Union speech this week, President Joe Biden will pose a question that he hopes will answer itself: Whose side are you on?
Are Americans, as he’ll frame it, on the side of lower health care costs, democratic freedoms and Ukraine’s fight to keep itself from being swallowed up by Russia? Or on the side of drug company profits, tax breaks for the wealthy and Russia’s autocratic leader Vladimir Putin?
The GOP has held hearings into the connections between Biden’s easy-migration rules, the Mexican cartels, and China.
“You talk about welcoming those crossing our border “seeking protection” — you’re welcoming drug dealers across our border!” said Rebecca Kiessling, the emotional Michigan mother of two young men who were killed by a drug overdose in Michigan in a March 2023 hearing. She added:
I don’t use the term “drug overdose” because this was not an overdose. This was murder. My children got fake Percocets [pills] that were fentanyl. There was no Percocet in it at all. And it’s “homicide,” not “overdose.”
Watch: Mom Testifies About Fentanyl Death of Her Two Sons
Homeland Security Committee Events / YouTube
Biden’s deputies have not pressured Mexico to forcibly shut down the drug trade because they need Mexico’s cooperation to stabilize the chaotic flow of migrants across Biden’s semi-open border, Feere said.
The Democrats’ eagerness to blame the GOP for drug deaths on Biden’s watch “all goes hand-in-hand with the administration’s general view of national sovereignty — they’re just not that into it,” said Feere, adding, “They don’t care about the effects it has on the American people. They don’t care about the impact that has on our society. This is an anti-border administration run by some of the most extreme American activists they can find … They’re sick.”
“The reality is that Americans see nothing but chaos and crime perpetrated by this administration — and even [administration officials] are realizing these little political games aren’t going to work to their advantage,” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment