Thursday, March 7, 2024

WOKE FASCIST FLEE AMERICA! - Media’s Donald Trump Panic Pushes Liberals to Emigrate - SO WHAT IF ALL JOE'S 15 MILLION ILLEGALS VOTED FOR TRUMP???

 

Media’s Donald Trump Panic Pushes Liberals to Emigrate

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 24: Republican presidential candidate former U.S. President Donald T
Drew Angerer/Getty Image

A growing number of Americans are getting ready to emigrate as former President Donald Trump zig-zags back toward the White House, an American journalist who owns an apartment in central Italy said.

“If Trump is reelected, Americans are planning to flee in droves,” Business Insider author Paul Starobin said as he described the chatter on a Facebook group for U.S emigrants in Italy:

From a woman in Montana who was planning to move to Tuscany: “Yes, it’s true! I bought a hilltop village home … for a song compared to US prices. Don’t want to be in US anymore. It’s expensive and sick of all the political crap and shootings.”

From a woman in Texas: “An insurrection by a narcissist who couldn’t accept election loss combined with his gun and abortion policies made moving more of a necessity than just a dream.”

The author is a veteran journalist, so he is skeptical of his social peers’ doomsday talk:

Every four years, as Americans gird themselves to choose a president, there’s talk, mainly among Democrats, of leaving the country. I’m off for Canada if unacceptable candidate X wins! And every four years, the promised exodus fails to materialize. It’s mostly just therapeutic venting.

But this time is different, in part because media outlets read by comfortable Americans are sounding the alarm about Trump’s approach, he said:

This time is different.

The alarm over Trump’s potential triumph in November is far starker than the fears stoked by past presidents. “A Trump dictatorship is increasingly inevitable,” a recent Washington Post headline warned. The Atlantic devoted an entire issue to the authoritarian horrors in store for America “If Trump Wins.”

The Atlantic‘s anti-Trump articles are hair-raising for people who choose to have faith in progressivism.

“Trump has signaled that in a second presidential term, he would further escalate his war on blue America,” wrote pro-migration author Ron Brownstein in the January/February issue

“Returning Trump to the presidency would reopen wounds that have barely healed in the [illegal migrant] communities he has said he would target immediately,” fretted author Caitlin Dickerson.

“He doesn’t just want to surveil, miseducate, and repress children who are exploring their emerging [transgender] identities,” worried Spencer Kornhaber. “He wants to interfere in the private lives of millions of adults, revoking freedoms that any pluralistic society should protect.”

Progressives at major media outlets will twist the anti-Trump message far above 11 during the next few months.

But the author — who owns an apartment in Italy – also admits that some of the migrants are being driven by poverty amid President Joe Biden’s migration-fuelled version of crony capitalism:

Trump is far from the only reason Americans are eyeing the exits. That’s true: Housing prices in America are high … Fewer and fewer Americans, pollsters have found, believe “the American Dream — that if you work hard you’ll get ahead — still holds true.” In 2012, it was 53%. By October 2023, it was down to 36%.

A poverty-caused exodus is ironic because many of the migrants voted for Biden’s migration policies, which spiked housing costs and reduced white-collar salaries.

The fading prosperity of America’s underemployed and underpaid college-graduate population is also driving more Americans to low-rent, low-cost nations. In October 2023, CNBC.com reported on the migration of economically precarious and stressed-out professionals to cheaper lodgings in Mexico:

CNBC Make It spoke with several Americans living in Mexico City who told us the area is cheaper, offers a more laid-back lifestyle, and is rich in culture and community. And while Mexico suffers significantly higher crime rates than the U.S., some Black Americans say the region can feel safer and more inclusive.

CNBC interviewed an unmarried teacher from Texas who fled a stressful life in the increasingly diverse state:

Adalia Aborisade, 48, moved to Mexico City in 2017 after teaching social studies, geography and history in Texas public schools for 19 years. “The amount of peace and ease that I have in this life — I would not trade that for the world,” Aborisade says.

“The American dream is a sham. Because I had the house, the cars, the kids. I did all of that, but even achieving those things, it still seemed like it wasn’t enough,” Aborisade says. “I felt like in that moment [of my life] I was cratering under the weight of all of the expectations that were on me as a teacher.”

The displacement of disconnected, stressed, economically precarious Americans is the flip side of the nation’s economic policy, which favors the relentless growth of Wall Street. That growth is fed by the federal strategy of extraction migration, which shifts family wages and workplace investment toward Wall Streetreal estatecoastal states, and government.

The ruthless economic policy is very unpopular among Americans, in part because it also diverts politicians’ focus away from American communities and the “deaths of despair” among discarded Americans.

The exodus of Americans to southern France, Italy, and other low-birthrate countries can be economically good for many ancient towns and villages.

Those rural communities are being suddenly depopulated by contraceptive technology, very low birthrates, government paralysis, and the technology-driven centralization of business and jobs in large urban districts.

Yet foreigners in other countries are also getting stressed out by the arrival of American outsiders in their vibrant communities, CNBC reported from Mexico City:

Some [Mexico City] locals, though, say this rush of [American] expatriates is threatening to change the fabric of the city. Rent prices are going up, short-term rentals are proliferating and Mexicans are being displaced by the more prosperous newcomers. These days on a walk through some popular neighborhoods, you may hear more English spoken than Spanish, and see cafes crowded with remote workers on laptops.

“Basically what happens is kind of a butterfly effect where … people from out of the country come and establish in the nicer areas or the nicer parts of our city, and then we are forced to go out,” [Mexican architect Leticia] Lozano says.

“There are a lot of people who [joke] we need a visa to go to those [busy] neighborhoods,” Mexican Anais Martinez told CNBC. “I’ve heard people saying, ‘Oh, now the dogs speak English.’

CUT AND PASTE YOUTUBE LINKS


JOE BIDEN: GLOBAL BRIBES SUCKERS IN UKRAINE

Elon Musk: 'This SECRET will put Joe Biden & Obama in JAIL!'

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=438bNCaHwk4

Classified Documents Are No Big Deal

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fSHW1Mei2g

 

Special counsel: Biden 'willfully' disclosed classified materials, but no criminal charges warranted

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaeA9cDewy0

 

No charges in Biden classified documents case

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyJFxA-FowE

 

 

Why Putin Endorses Biden

Presidents Biden and Putin are trading barbs as of late, albeit through interpreters and intermediaries.  At a California Democrat fundraiser, Biden called Putin a “crazy SOB,” while Putin sarcastically responded in so many words that Biden could have said, “Volodya, well done, thank you [for the endorsement], you’ve helped me a lot.”  (The name Volodya is derived from Vladimir.  In Russian, it conveys the idea of ruling with peace or being a renowned ruler.)

Biden’s “crazy SOB” remark came during a speech about climate change, where he reiterated his claim “the existential threat to humanity is climate.”  When asked to comment on Biden’s “SOB” jab, Putin referred to the earlier endorsement he gave Biden over former President Donald Trump.  From this exchange, Vladimir Putin’s comments are the ones deserving our attention.

Mr. Putin’s remarks broach the broader and more serious question: whom does Russia — along with other potential U.S. adversaries — want to see in the White House come November 2024?  Whom would Vladimir Putin or Xi Jinping prefer to face in a stare-down when the stakes are high and objective is Ukraine, Taiwan, or the South China Sea?  Which candidate would Iran, North Korea, or the Latin cartels prefer to see in the White House?

We should take the Russian president at his word with his endorsement of Biden.  Every international autocrat, dictator, and warlord would almost certainly want an increasingly frail President Biden with declining faculties over the nationalistic and assertive Donald Trump, who would openly adopt a more robust “America first” leadership approach to defense and foreign policy.

Plus, why would Vladimir Putin want a President Trump when actual events suggest he could achieve Russia’s objectives more easily and at less cost with President Biden remaining in office, whose actions, behavior, predilections, and temperament Russia has observed and benefited from?  In Joe Biden, Russia — i.e., Putin — likely assesses a president (along with his present advisers and Cabinet members) as more interested in globalists’ designs from Davos, Dubai, and Turtle Bay than confronting tough issues like Middle East proxy wars, Russian revanchism, nuclear proliferation, and NATO solidarity.

Russia has watched President Biden, as we all have.  The Russians observed him as Barack Obama’s vice president.  Then the U.S. obliged the Kremlin by canceling missile defense systems for Central Europe.  Mr. Putin noted U.S. facilitation of the transfer of large uranium assets to Russia.  The Obama administration’s fuzzy line-in-the-sand indecisiveness over Syrian chemical weapons made way for Russia’s effective military intervention in Syria.  President Putin must have approved of President Obama’s concessions to Iran for the nuclear deal, and it was Obama who notably told former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev that Vladimir Putin should give him more “space” and that “after [his] election, [he] would have more flexibility.”  On the Obama-Biden watch, Mr. Putin would conduct his first invasion of Ukraine in 2014 to seize Crimea.

Early in his own presidency, Mr. Biden lifted his predecessor’s sanctions on the Nord Stream 2 pipeline (while canceling the domestic Keystone pipeline), giving Mr. Putin a big concession to set the tone.  He further canceled Trump-era border policies, beginning a rush of migration now challenging U.S. sovereignty.  In June 2021, he lifted Trump sanctions on Iran’s national oil company to revive the nuclear agreement as well as enabling that nation to engage in a strategic alliance with Russia.  In Geneva, Mr. Biden met Mr. Putin, but instead of warning Russia not to hack any American sites, he gave him a list of 16 critical infrastructures he must not hack.  Then, in August, Mr. Biden presided over a harried, chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan that likely was the green light for Russia to invade Ukraine.  In December 2021, President Biden, watching the Russian military build-up along Ukraine’s border, warned Mr. Putin of dire consequences if Russia were to invade, but in February 2022, Russia did attack Ukraine.  Finally in mid-2022, Biden traveled to meet the Saudi crown prince — the leader of a nation he once pledged to make a “pariah” — having to lobby for more oil production amid record-high U.S. gas prices.

In contrast, from the start, the Trump administration implemented a more uncompromising U.S. policy vis-à-vis Russia.  Russia felt, in that administration’s first year alone, consequences of more assertive U.S. defense and foreign policy.  In November 2017, the U.S. approved the $10.5-billion sale of Patriot anti-missile systems to NATO ally Poland in the face of perceived Russian aggression.  In December of that same year, the U.S. authorized transfer of lethal anti-tank weapons to Ukraine to help that nation fight off Russian-backed separatists.  U.S. troop presence in Eastern Europe increased over Obama-era levels to bolster European defenses against Russia, and the U.S. imposed monetary sanctions targeting bad individual Russian actors and companies instead of sanctioning that nation’s sovereign debt.

Further, the Trump administration pushed NATO allies to increase defense spending.  In even more direct confrontations, Russian mercenaries and other pro-Syrian regime forces attacking U.S. troops in Syria were killed, while the U.S. under President Trump sanctioned Putin’s largest geo-economic project, the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline to Europe (which President Biden reversed).  In hindsight, President Trump’s tenure with its more forceful stance likely gave President Putin pause over four-plus years for his plans to invade Ukraine until the Biden administration’s withdrawal from Afghanistan.

November 2024’s election has parallels with both 2020 and 2016, with the latter instructive in that Mr. Putin will probably again prefer the Democrat, regardless of any of the media’s latest infernal efforts to cast Donald Trump as a “colluding” Putin ally.

While speculative, Vladimir Putin was arguably just as surprised as CNN to wake up that November 2016 Wednesday morning and learn that the “impossible“ had happened.  Two days before the election, pollsters and statisticians gave Hillary Clinton odds of between 75 and 99 percent of winning the election.  Given such overwhelming pre-election global political and media consensus, a Clinton victory was probably baked into Kremlin intelligence briefings, causing Putin never to have given Donald Trump more consideration.  His current endorsement of Biden for a second term — flattering him with praises like “he is a more experienced, predictable person” — is cover for knowing what a second Trump administration would mean for checking Russia and its adventurism.

If our nation’s recent “past is prologue,” global bad actors like Vladimir Putin will instinctively favor the Democrat candidate, particularly with the current Democrat agenda wreaking havoc on the fabric of American society and fomenting chaos with its open borders policies.  In the specific case of President Biden, by easing sanctions, mollifying Iran, directing the Afghanistan withdrawal calamity, and weakening U.S. energy security, he transmitted the wrong signals to an autocrat who has exercised near absolute control over Russia for a quarter-century.  It should come as no surprise that Mr. Putin would now endorse Joe Biden for president in a second term instead of Donald Trump.  Let’s rightly understand why.

Colonel Chris J. Krisinger, USAF (ret.) served a tour as the military adviser to the undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs at the Department of State.  He is a U.S. Air Force Academy graduate, is an honors graduate of the U.S. Naval War College, and also was a national defense fellow at Harvard University.  If you would like to continue the conversation: cjkrisinger@gmail.com.

Image: World Economic Forum via FlickrCC BY-NC-SA 2.0.

No comments: