San Francisco is a disaster about which Nancy
Pelosi she cares nothing. It is a city ravaged by
drug abuse, homelessness, rampant crime and all
the other scourges of leftism. She lives
extravagantly in her gated mansion. She lives
a life of wealth and privilege in city suffering a
civilizational collapse created and orchestrated by
her own party. She revels in it. She has become a
near-billionairess by way of politics of the most
corrupt variety. She is indeed a cancer on the
body politic. PATRICIA McCARTHY
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY IS NOW THE LA RAZA SUPREMACY GLOBALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY FOR BILLIONAIRES, BANKSTERS AND WIDER OPEN BORDERS THE BILLIONAIRES DEMAND TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED!
The Democrat party is now becoming near
exclusive home of the ruling class, as can be borne out by recent Congressional
elections.
Ruling Class Held Hostage
by Trump’s Impeachment
Every year 3 million
visitors make the pilgrimage to Ellis Island. It is estimated nearly
forty percent of all Americans can trace their ancestors to the 20 million
immigrants that were processed through New York and Ellis Island from 1892 to
1954. These prospective citizens were determined to escape
authoritarianism, soul grinding poverty, war and its aftermath, immutable class
structures as well as religious and ethnic persecution.
Once here they would
immerse themselves in learning English and the nation’s founding documents in
preparation for the most gut wrenching (passing the oral citizenship test) and
emotional (the swearing in ceremony) day in their lives. Thanks to their
life experience and their determination to be citizens of the only nation in
the history of mankind to be founded on the principle that all men are created
equal, these newly minted Americans were among the most loyal and most
well-versed in the nation’s founding.
What would the vast
majority of those that willingly left everything behind to travel for up to
three weeks, oftentimes across a storm-tossed ocean and relegated to the
unsanitary and wretched conditions in steerage, think of the impeachment of
Donald Trump?
Nearly all of the nations
whence these immigrants came were governed by an immutable class
structure. At the apex of this rigid class pyramid was either a monarchy
and its attendant birthright nobility or a dictatorship and its coercive administrative
hierarchy or a communist oligarchy and its implacable bureaucracy.
Class mobility was at the whim and discretion of the autocrat or the oligarchy.
These nameless and
faceless masses had virtually no say in their nation’s governance and they were
at the mercy of the economic and foreign policy of the ruling elites.
They were viewed as being grossly inferior, uneducable and deplorable --
thus mere pawns to be sacrificed in the country’s wars and were little more
than indentured servants to the ruling class.
On the other hand, thanks
to a Constitution constructed to prevent the ascendancy of any one faction into
a position of permanent power and the evolution of a rigid ruling class
hierarchy, the United States possessed the framework and opportunity for anyone
to succeed and live in peace and economic security thus attracting millions to
its shores.
However, beginning in the
1960’s many of those that came through Ellis Island began to notice a change in
the relatively benign and Constitution-oriented governing class. With the
exponential growth of government, a new and potentially destructive class
structure began to evolve, one that was reminiscent of ruling class supremacy
in those nations they had escaped.
A mindset, alien to 170
years of American history, took root amid overwhelming peace and
prosperity. A growing faction in the country began to believe that
they were pre-ordained to govern as they were superior to the unwashed masses,
particularly racial and ethnic minorities as well as those steeped in religion
and morality. Over the years the proponents of this belief infiltrated
the universities and the media-entertainment complex creating an ever-growing
army of narcissists and authoritarians which mutated into today’s American Ruling
Class.
Angelo Codevilla writing
in the American Spectator identified the characteristics of
the American Ruling Class as follows:
Today’s ruling class,
from Boston to San Diego, was formed by an educational system that exposed them
to the same ideas and gave them remarkably uniform guidance, as well as taste
and habits. Regardless of what business or profession they are in, their
road up included government channels and government money because, as
government has grown, its boundary with the rest of American life has become
indistinct. Many began their careers in government and leveraged their
way into the private sector.
Its attitude is key to
understanding our bipartisan ruling class. Its first tenet is that “we”
are the best and brightest while the rest of Americans are retrograde, racist,
and dysfunctional unless properly constrained.
Our ruling class’s agenda
is power for itself. While it stakes its claims through
intellectual-moral pretense, it holds power by one of the oldest and most prosaic
of means: patronage and promises thereof. Like left-wing parties always
and everywhere, it is a “machine,” that is, based on providing tangible rewards
to its members. Hence our ruling class’s standard approach to any and all
matters, its solution to any and all problems, is to increase the power of the
government-- meaning of those who run it, meaning themselves.
By taxing and parceling
out more than a third of what Americans produce through regulations that reach
deep into American life, our ruling class is making itself the arbiter of
wealth and poverty.
The ruling class is
keener to reform the American people’s family and spiritual lives than their
economic and civic ones. It believes that the Christian family (and the
orthodox Jewish one too) is rooted in and perpetuates the ignorance commonly
called religion that is the greatest barrier to human progress. This
dismissal of the American people’s intellectual, spiritual, and moral substance
is the very heart of what our ruling class is about.
[Lastly,] America’s best
and brightest believe themselves qualified and duty bound to direct the lives
of not only Americans but of foreigners as well. Its default solution to
international threats has been to commit blood and treasure to long-term,
twilight efforts to reform the world’s Vietnams, Somalias, Iraqs and
Afghanistans.
Since the Reagan era, the
American Ruling Class has succeeded in electing George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton,
George W. Bush and Barack Obama, all of whom were members in good standing.
Thus, by 2016 the ruling elites were thoroughly entrenched and dominant
throughout the halls of power. They were prepared to govern this
nation for many years to come as one of the flaws in the magnificent governing
blueprint set up by the founding fathers was the reality that this government
can only function with just two major political parties. Both political
party hierarchies had and fully intended to continue nominating candidates for
the presidency and Congress who were either beholden to or members of the
ruling class. The rank and file voters were left with only superficial
differences in the choice of candidates.
The election of Donald
Trump in 2016 was an act of defiance and a rebellion by the deplorables and a
devastating blow to the ruling elites. With his election, President
Trump began the process of a Republican Party divorce from the establishment --
which is now well underway. Thus, the ruling class’s political
hegemony is severely threatened. They cannot achieve their endgame
without de facto control of both parties. Which is why Donald Trump may
well be the most influential President in modern American history.
The Democrat party is now
becoming near exclusive home of the ruling class, as can be borne out by recent
Congressional elections. Before the 2018 mid-term elections, the richest 66
House districts were split 38 Democrats and 28 Republican. After the
election the Democrats held 56 and the Republicans 10 In the 15 districts
where at least 50% of the population have a college degree, all are represented
by Democrats as of 2018, whereas the Democrats controlled 13 of 15 in
2016.
Nancy Pelosi: Cancer on the body politic
"Nancy Pelosi is a cancer on the body politic."
Those are the words of
Mark Levin and he is profoundly correct. It is actually an
understatement. This woman has dedicated her entire recent term to
impeaching President Trump over a phone call. She stupidly bought
into Adam Schiff’s lunacy that they had the evidence that the president
had threatened the president of Ukraine with a quid pro quo
-- either investigate the Clinton campaign’s meddling in
the 2016 election or else. None of that was true, any more than
the Russia collusion hoax, but Pelosi still gambled that she could take out
Trump with that phony ploy. It was Biden who threatened Ukraine with an
actual quid pro quo -- either fire the man
investigating my son or lose a billions dollars in U.S. aid.
Then came the Wuhan
virus. Oh my, were the Democrats thrilled. This would
be the crisis they could use, manipulate to their desired end. This
is how utterly stupid these Democrats are! This is how malicious
they are; they are ready and willing to destroy the United States
economy to take down a president they abhor. Why do the loathe him
so? Because he is effective and successful. The American
people, those not members of the political/academic class, love this
man. They love him for a myriad of good reasons. Chief among them is
that he recognizes and respects them, unlike the partisans of the left who view
most Americans as nothing more than flotsam and jetsam, inconveniences they
must tolerate. So superior to the worth of most citizens do the
likes of those who inhabit Pelosi’s circle of pals see themselves,
they suffer no unease over dismissing us as invalid. That so many of
us love and revere President Trump makes us all the more worthy of their
dripping disdain.
Nancy Pelosi is a blight
upon her district. San Francisco is a disaster about which she
cares nothing. It is a city ravaged by drug abuse, homelessness,
rampant crime and all the other scourges of leftism. She lives
extravagantly in her gated mansion. She lives a life of wealth
and privilege in city suffering a civilizational collapse created and
orchestrated by her own party. She revels in it. She has
become a near-billionairess by way of politics of the most corrupt
variety. She is indeed a cancer on the body politic.
How do sentient people
watch her on any of the many cable news programs on which she appears listen to
her blather and lies? She accuses the president of “fiddling while
people are dying.” What nonsense. He was on the case while she was
obsessed with impeaching him! He banned flights from China in
January, created a task force to address the virus but the left-media did not
notice. She was encouraging the people of San Francisco to join the
crowd in Chinatown to celebrate Chinese New Year in late
February! She and Schiff et al were so were obsessed with
impeaching him they ignored the Wuhan virus completely. It was as
though they actually thought they could remove him from office! That
is how deluded they are. Pelosi still is. She shows up
all over cable TV with her surgically-modified, botoxed face, her red
lipstick reminiscent of the RuPaul’s drag queen show and expects
that Americans will pay attention to anything she has to say. She has become a
joke, a punchline.
Anyone paying attention
to anything Pelosi has to say at this moment in time is mentally
challenged. That would be the same people who think Joe Biden is a
viable candidate for the presidency, a man so obviously in the throes of
dementia it is a mystery why no one, especially his wife, has not put a stop to
his campaign. Biden is pathetic, always a man of little or no
character -- and a racist. What he did to Clarence Thomas with
relish was obscene, a window into his inner depravity. At this point
in time, Biden is no more presidential material than Lenny of Mice and
Men. Joe Biden is as much a cancer on the body politic as
Nancy Pelosi. He is a shallow empty suit who has long enjoyed and
abused the power vested in him as a senator. He is also a creep. He
fondles and sniffs women and girls so chronically he should probably be on the
sex offender registry. And this is the man the Democrat party is
running as their candidate for the presidency!
What the Democrat party
has become is a tragedy for America. We need to be a two-party
nation, with each seeking adherence to the Constitution. But over
the eight years of the Obama administration and his commitment to transforming
America, the Democrat party was indeed transformed. It is now fully
socialist and authoritarian, anti-First Amendment, anti-Second Amendment,
anti-freedom and anti-Constitutional. The left has no tolerance for
persons who are pro-life, pro-Second Amendment, pro-capitalism,
pro-liberty. The economic system that has brought untold millions
out of poverty is their enemy. They want and lobby for the
dependency of the masses who they believe will be certified democrat
voters. Our left has been transformed into a vicious mob of
anti-American fascists. Elect or re-elect any of them to office and
we will get what we deserve, a nightmare of unimaginable
proportions. Pelosi and her ilk are not only certifiably insane, they are
well and truly evil. Their intentions for the wealth and sanctity of this
nation as founded are malicious. She and her fellow elitists could not
care less for the citizens they were elected to represent. This is
why they are unable to grasp why so many of us love this president; he
does care about all the folks they disregard – all those people who are
bringing food to our markets, stocking the shelves, still picking up our trash,
taking care of those who are sick across the nation. This pandemic
crisis has demonstrated for all to see that the American left is as
much an enemy of America as China.
Caricature by Donkey
Hotey // CC
BY-SA 2.0
Nancy Calls the Shots In
California
“Blessed to have her
leadership,” Gov. Newsom says of Nancy Pelosi, during coronavirus crackdown.
March 23, 2020
Lloyd Billingsley
“We believe the virus will
impact about 56 percent of California’s population,” California governor Gavin
Newsom said in a press conference last Thursday. So
the governor was ordering all residents of Californians to stay home, except
for essential services, and the order would remain in force until further
notice.
“In addition,” Newsom said, “I
want to thank Speaker Nancy Pelosi. We had a very long conversation today. Talk
about meeting the moment. We are so blessed to have her leadership in
California. She’s very familiar to northern Californians, certainly familiar to
me as a former mayor of San Francisco.” In reality, Newsom’s relationship with
Pelosi goes back a lot farther.
William Newsom, Gavin’s
grandfather, helped Pat Brown win the 1943 race for San Francisco district
attorney. In 1960, Governor Pat Brown awarded the concession for the Squaw
Valley Winter Olympics to William Newsom and John Pelosi. In 1963, John’s son
Paul married Nancy D’Alesandro, daughter of congressman and Baltimore mayor
Thomas D’Alesandro. In 1969 Paul and Nancy Pelosi moved to San Francisco, where
Paul’s brother Ron was a San Francisco supervisor. Ron married William Newsom’s
daughter Barbara, and until they divorced Nancy Pelosi was Gavin Newsom’s aunt
by marriage.
In 1975, governor Jerry Brown
appointed Gavin Newsom’s father to a judgeship in Placer County, and in 1978 to
the state Court of Appeal. Newsom admires Jerry Brown but for leadership now
looks to Nancy Pelosi, a woman on the far reaches of the left.
In 2001, long after Stalinist
thug Harry Bridges was exposed as a Soviet agent, Nancy Pelosi praised Bridges in
the Congressional
Record as “arguably the most significant labor leader of the
twentieth century.” Pelosi was also a big fan of Vincent Hallinan, Bridges’
lawyer and the 1952 candidate for president of the Progressive Party, a
Communist front. The progressive Democrat Pelosi is also a vicious partisan and
that trend emerges in Gavin Newsom.
In an interview with Politico last
year, Newsom said Republicans would go into “the waste bin of history.” He
referenced “the experience and temperament of Speaker Pelosi” a woman with
“better sense than a lot of folks.” Newsom also announced a commitment to
“universal health care,” and to make that happen, the governor is exploiting
the coronavirus crisis.
Newsom’s Executive Order N-25-20, issued on
March 12, “readies state to commandeer hotels and medical facilities to isolate
and treat COVID-19 patients,”
and also “readies the state to commandeer property for temporary residences and
medical facilities for quarantining, isolating or treating individuals.” As
Milton Friedman observed, temporary government measures have a tendency to
become permanent.
Newsom’s budget provides nearly $100 million for
the health care of foreign nationals illegally present in the United
States. Newsom has not announced
support for stepping up cooperation with federal border enforcement that would
prevent carriers of coronavirus and other contagions from entering the United
States. Likewise, it remains unclear whether the state’s sanctuary law would
allow carriers to defy quarantine measures.
Like Nancy Pelosi, who invokes
the “spark of divinity” in MS-13
gang members, Gavin Newsom has a soft spot for convicted murderers. Last year
he reprieved all 737 of them
on California’s death row. In similar style, his coronavirus crackdown cuts
criminals a huge break.
The state department of
corrections, headed by Newsom appointee Ralph Diaz, is barring family members of crime victims from attending parole hearings. The family members, and
prosecutors, must appear by phone or video conference but inmates’ attorneys
can appear in person. This ban, allegedly based on virus fears, will prevent
victims’ families from confronting murderers face to face.
Doris Tate, mother of slain
actress Sharon Tate, frequently appeared at parole hearings to keep Charles Manson and his followers in prison. The
department did not indicate when family members of crime victims would again be
allowed to appear in person at parole hearings.
Meanwhile, according to
California health officials, the day before Newsom’s “stay home” edict, there
were nearly 699 confirmed cases of
coronavirus in California. In a state of 40 million, that amounts to about
.0000175 percent of the population. Gov. Newsom, not a scientist, did not
explain how he knew 56 percent of the population, more than 22 million people,
would eventually come down with the virus.
Newsom did say he had been on
the phone with the House Speaker, so if Californians thought Nancy Pelosi was
calling the shots it would be hard to blame them. For her part, Speaker Pelosi
may have more in mind than, as they discussed, “what will be needed over the
course of the next few months.”
As Tad Friend noted in the New Yorker, Newsom is forward looking and like his hero Bobby Kennedy,
“Newsom seeks to embody Kennedy’s grainy glamour, to provide moral clarity in a
bewildering hour.” The governor wears Ermenegildo Zegna shirts and his hair is
“lacquered with Oribe gel,” but Nancy Pelosi may be grooming her boy for a run
at the White House in 2024.
In the meantime, as Newsom said
Thursday, “We are so blessed to have her leadership in California.”
Shouldn't Pelosi investigate how many deaths Obama/Biden
policies caused?
By Jack Hellner
For the past few years most of the media and other Democrats have
tried to take out Trump with intentional lies about Russian collusion and
endless investigations about Russia and other things.
Now, they are trying to take him out by saying that he is causing
many deaths because he purportedly reacted too slowly to the virus from China.
They are even calling him a racist because he truthfully calls it the Chinese
virus or Wuhan virus. They are clearly more respectful of China, where they
lied continuously about the virus, than they are of Trump. A significant number
of media outlets are even censuring the daily press conferences.
For the past few days, we have been treated to the media building
up the deplorable, despicable Pelosi, who hung out in San Francisco for a week
and delayed aid for days as she larded up the bailout bill with special
interest money, while trashing Trump. Why isn’t the media trashing Pelosi
instead of praising her for what she did? Now she says Trump should be
investigated for his slow response and blaming him for the deaths. Pelosi
will soon be larding up a new bill with more pork and radical leftist policies.
On Sunday, we were also treated to a Democrat campaign worker on
Meet the Press, posing as Chuck Todd, asking the brilliant Biden if Trump
had blood on his hands.
Biden and Pelosi should be asked how many more people would have
died if Trump listened to the experts at the World Health Organization in
mid-January when they repeated the Chinese propaganda that the virus wouldn’t
spread human to human. Why do so many claim Trump knewthe problem months ago
when WHO said they didn’t know in January? How many more people would have died
if Trump hadn’t clamped down on travel from China at the end of January, while
Pelosi, the media and other Democrats fiddled with impeachment?
Good reporters would ask Pelosi and Biden how many people would
have died if they were in charge, since they called the travel restrictions
racist and an overreaction? In February, Pelosi even encouraged people to go to
Chinatown and she claims Trump reacted too late!
How many more people would have die if Biden and Pelosi get their
way and we stop using oil? How would the medical supplies, equipment and drugs
move around the U.S. and the World without planes, ships, trucks and planes?
Maybe journalists should ask Governors Newsom and the brilliant
Cuomo, leftists who also want to stop using oil, how many more people would die
if they didn’t have hospital ships powered by oil?
How come the brilliant Cuomo had no idea that there were thousands
of idle ventilators sitting in a warehouse while he was trashing the federal
government for a shortage?
How many more people would die if we kept relying on China for so
much of our medical needs, as we have ever since Obama/Biden said manufacturing
was gone for good?
If Pelosi, the media or anyone else would like to investigate an
administration for causing deaths she should look at the Obama/Biden years.
There is a treasure trove of examples:
How many Worldwide deaths occurred because Obama pulled all troops
out of Iraq and allowed ISIS, who Obama called the JV team, to greatly expand
their power?
How many people died because Obama/Biden didn’t declare a national
emergency for six months after the swine flu pandemic hit? How many died
because they didn’t shut down the economy?
How many people are dying today because Obama/Biden didn’t
replenish the medical supply and equipment inventory after it was depleted by
the swine flu pandemic? Why didn’t they prepare? Why is Trump being blamed for
the shortfall.
How many extra people died because costs skyrocketed under
Obamacare mandates and life expectancy went down for four straight years?
How many lives were saved after Trump lifted the individual
mandate, costs stabilized, people again had freedom of choice and life
expectancy ticked back up in 2019?
How many deaths were caused in Ukraine because Obama/Biden refused
to give them defensive weapons because that would have made Putin mad?
How many deaths have been caused because Obama/Kerry allowed Putin
to monitor Assad and his chemical weapons?
How many countries and people are threatened because the Obama
administration allowed Russia to buy U.S. uranium assets after they gave
massive kickbacks to the Clintons?
How many excess deaths did we have because Obama/Biden did so
little to stop the opioid addiction?
How many deaths occurred worldwide because of terrorism when the
Obama Administration continually lied through the media to get the deal done
with Iran?
How many lives were lost from terrorism and drugs because
President Obama dictatorially stopped a year’s long investigation into a
billion dollar a year drug running operation by Hezbollah to appease the
tyrant dictators from Iran? Why don’t Pelosi and most journalists care?
How many lives has Trump saved because he has cut off the
lifeblood from Iran tyrants who spread death around the World and pledge death
to America and death to Israel?
How many lives are lost because Obama/Biden, almost all
journalists and other Democrats support killing fully developed children before
and after birth? As science has gotten better Democrats have become more
radical in their support of Planned Parenthood.
Caricature by Donkey
Hotey
Being relegated
exclusively to the Democrat party means that the ruling class must accommodate
and adopt the radical tenets of the much larger Marxist/socialist wing of the
Party if they wish to win the Party’s nominations for elective offices.
A self-defeating and ultimately destructive path as militant socialists
will, in due course, consume them. Alternatively, and in league with their
propaganda arm, the mainstream media, the ruling elites have pulled out all the
stops and abandoned any ethical, moral or legal restraints to get rid of Donald
Trump and recapture their previous hierarchical influence in the Republican
Party.
The abominably fabricated
and unconstitutional impeachment farce is the culmination of three years of
frustration and determination to rid the nation of the “threat” that is Donald
Trump’s takeover of a major political party and transformation of it into a
vehicle of populism. Which would allow the citizenry and not the elites
to determine the course of the nation’s future. In reality,
impeachment, endless investigations, fabrications and the constant vilification
of Donald Trump are aimed at intimidating the nameless and unwashed masses who
had the temerity and insolence to vote against the wishes of the ruling
class.
Out of 20 million
immigrants there are perhaps less than 100,000 of us living today that have any
memory of being processed through New York and Ellis Island during the 60+
years it was the gateway to America. The determination to invalidate an
election and destroy the Constitutional foundation of this country for the sake
of achieving unfettered political supremacy is not the United States we have
come to know and love. Despite their protestations to the contrary, the
ruling class and their public face, the Democratic Party, does not love this
country and its people and are, in fact, little different than the ruling
elites that caused so many to seek refuge in America.
FEINSTEIN
HAS SPENT HER POLITICAL LIFE STALKING THE HALLS OF CONGRESS SNIFFING OUT DEALS
THAT PUT HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS IN HER POCKETS.
SHE HAS
AVOIDED PROSECUTION BY VOTING AGAINST ANY ETHICS BILLS AND HER HUSBAND, RICHARD
BLUM'S HANDING OUT "CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION" BRIBES TO EVERY DEMOCRAT
OUT THERE!
IN THE
November 2006 election, the voters demanded congressional ethics reform. And
so, the newly appointed chairman of the Senate Rules Committee, Dianne
Feinstein, D-Calif., is now duly in charge of regulating the ethical behavior
of her colleagues. But for many years, Feinstein has been beset by her own
ethical conflict of interest, say congressional ethics experts.
“All in all, it was an
incredible victory for the Chinese government. Feinstein has done more for Red
China than other any serving U.S. politician. “ Trevor Loudon
“Our entire crony
capitalist system, Democrat and Republican alike, has become a kleptocracy
approaching par with third-world hell-holes. This is the way a great
country is raided by its elite.” ---- Karen McQuillan AMERICAN
THINKER.com
Democrats Have Become a
Disfigured Reflection of the Party They Once Were
In
an amazingly prophetic story by Isaac Bashevis Singer entitled "The Gentleman
from Cracow," about life in the village of Frampol, where "the food
was scarce and the water foul," one day, a young man, a doctor,
arrives in a carriage drawn by eight horses. He tells the villagers
that his wife and baby have just died in childbirth, and his rabbi had advised
him that his melancholy would disappear in Frampol. He begins to
spend a lot of money in the town, and the town prospers as never
before. He finally decides to marry one of the local
women. On the day of the wedding, "the gentleman from Cracow
revealed his true identity." Who is he? Singer
reveals him to us: "He was no longer the young man the villagers had
welcomed, but a creature covered with scales, with an eye in his chest, and on
his forehead a horn that rotated at great speed. His arms were
covered with hair, thorns, and elflocks, and his tail was a mass of live
serpents, for he was none other than Ketev Mriri, Chief of the Devils."
The
above story could be a parable about the Democratic Party, which can now
rightly be called the Leftocratic Party, as it has embraced extremist socialist
and communist views. Its members have morphed from being a voice of
hope as one of America's two great parties to being properly characterized as
unbelievable liars in their animus toward Pres. Donald J. Trump, voices of
perversion as they publicly condemn any reservations expressed about
"gender fluidity," and anti-prosperity as they wax indignant about
Trump's disengagement from various multilateral deals that drain our
economy. Practical and realistic concerns about Islamic terrorist
threats are dismissed with outraged, scowling faces as vicious, maniacal
racism. Further, the so-called impeachment hearings distorted or
discarded almost every time-honored legal norm under our rule of law.
The
Leftocrats are apologists for evil (not just disagreeable) foreign regimes and are against
fundamental Constitutional ideas and structures such as the Tenth Amendment as
they resist federal disengagement from setting nationwide education
priorities. Leftocrats have been vehemently calling for abolition of
the Electoral College. They are cursing the president from every
podium and venue that presents itself and thereby undermine the separation of
powers and demonstrate disrespect for the law of the land since our president
is head of the Executive Branch.
We
see in their contempt for federal marijuana laws, the institution of sanctuary
cities, and their hostility to border enforcement a deranged lack of
perspective regarding the health of our citizens, many of whom are struggling
with or dying from drug usage. The opioid epidemic we face is clearly
connected to the opioid supply, and that, in turn, is clearly a border
issue. Yet they put aside the well-being of so many poor souls
caught by the hook of addiction into ignoring border enforcement in order to
score political hate points against the president. Instead of
looking at border issues in terms of law and national health, they turn
enforcement into an ugly, defamatory argument about American and Trumpian
racism. Only 14 years ago, they were able to agree with Republicans
on the need for stronger border enforcement, whereas now they try to block
every Trump attempt — mandated by the American people — to bring order out of
chaos on our southern border.
Their
ideas of fairness, justice, family, morality, generosity, love, responsibility
are not American in any meaningful way. Instead of promoting
political ideals consistent with the U.S. history of Judeo-Christian ideas and
ideals (based upon a Protestant foundation derived from English speaking
Protestants, albeit with overlays of other Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish
traditions), they have derived most of their ideas from abstractions based
in cultural Marxism.
The
phrase "melting pot" had gained wide currency in 1908, during the
great wave of Slavic, Jewish, and Italian immigration, when Israel Zangwill's
play "The Melting Pot" was produced. In it, a character says with enthusiasm, "America is God's
crucible, the great melting-pot where all the races of Europe are melting and
re-forming!"
Beginning
in the 1960s, instead of the melting pot, the multiculturalists — rooted in the
cultural Marxism of Theodor Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, Eric
Fromm, Antonio Gramsci, and others — began
affirming the diversity "salad bowl" image. Our national
motto: E pluribus unum ("out of many one") has
been stood on its head, whereby the goal of the nation is purported as
fulfilled only by highlighting and praising the distinctions of every
sub-cultural group in the U.S. by age, ethnicity, immigrant status, sexual
deviancy (preference), and all "protected classes." The
cultural Marxists want us to believe that the melting pot ideal was a deception
imposed on society as a whole by white, male, straight Christians and that the
melting pot ideal lacked truth, democratic values, and social
vigor. The masses and certain groups in particular were shunted
aside, dispossessed, ignored, or brutalized. America, despite its
apparent successes, was sucking the hope and lifeblood out of the masses of
people.
For
those of us who have witnessed the progress of African-Americans since the days
of Jim Crow and have experienced the economic and social progress of
generations produced by the dirt-poor, non-English-speaking immigrants, the
harsh criticisms of America by the Leftocrats has morphed into an outrageous
and almost demonic defiance of reason. Where is the balance, the
display of reasonableness, the acceptance of others? Instead, we see
an unbridled, vulgar, destructive mindset on display everywhere in the party of
derangement. Just consider the language used about Trump by Robert De Niro or the mock bloody beheadings of our
president. Consider the evil assassin who tried to kill Republican congressmen in Florida.
The
Democrats now rightly can be renamed Leftocrats. Their hostility to
President Trump has reached pathological dimensions or worse. Their
mantras about the "top 1%" or "top 0.1%" have become the
tip of a spear of seemingly bottomless hatred for our president, our history,
our legal structures, our institutions, our religious heritage, our language,
and our achievements in every sphere of human endeavor. They have
left the realm of constructive criticism and have moved even beyond destructive
criticism into the pathological domain of hysterical dementia — or, as with
Singer's story, a level of unhingedness even beyond the ken of psychiatry.
Why the rich favor the Democrats
There's little doubt that
today's Democrat Party is the party of the rich. Actually, that's an
understatement. Far more than billionaires are involved. A better
expression of reality would be to say a fundamental core of Democrat coalition
is the managerial class, also known as the elite. These are the
people who run the media, Hollywood and the entertainment industry, the big
corporations, the universities and schools, the investment banks, and Wall
Street. They populate the upper levels of government
bureaucracies. These are the East and West Coasters.
The alliance of the
affluent with the Democrat Party can be seen in the widely disproportionate
share of hefty political donations from the well-to-do going to Democrats and a
bevy of left-wing causes. It's also why forty-one out of the fifty
wealthiest congressional districts are represented by Democrats.
BLOG: DEMS LOVE SOCIALISM
FOR ILLEGALS TO KEEP THEM COMING AND BREEDING ANCHOR BABIES FOR WELFARE AND
SOCIALISM FOR BANKS. TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF IT!
Bernie Sanders is
an exception. But he's an anomaly viewed as dangerous to the party,
which is why he's being crushed by the Democrat establishment.
Why do the wealthy align
with the Democrats? The answer may seem counter-intuitive, but it is
really quite simple. It's surely not ideals or high-minded
principles. Nor is it ignorance. Rather, it boils down to
raw self-interest.
In his book, The Age of
Entitlement: America Since the Sixties, Christopher Caldwell notes
that rich Americans think themselves to be as vulnerable as
blacks. They are a relatively small minority of the
population. They fear being resented for their wealth and power and
of having much of that taken from them. Accordingly, the wealthy
seek to protect what is theirs by preventing strong majorities from forming by
using the divide and conquer principle.
As R.R. Reno writes when reviewing
Caldwell's book: "Therefore, the richest and most
powerful people in America have strong incentives
to support an anti-majoritarian political system." He goes
on: "Wealthy individuals shovel donations into elite institutions that
incubate identity politics, which further fragments the nation and prevents the
formation of majorities."
Some of the rotten
fruit of the wealthy taking this approach include multiculturalism,
massive immigration of diverse people, resistance to encouraging
assimilation, racial strife, trying to turn white males into pariahs,
and the promotion of gender confusion. Through it all, society
is bombarded with the Orwellian mantra that "diversity is
strength," as if repeating it often enough can make it so. It
is also why patriotism and a common American culture are so disparaged
today. Those from the upper strata of society project the idea that
if you're a flag-waving American, you must be some kind of retrograde
mouth-breathing yokel.
The wealthy as a groups
are content to dissolve the glue that holds the U.S. together. And
it is all done to enhance and preserve their power, wealth, and influence. This
is why they so hate Donald Trump. He strives to unite people
and the country, although you'd never know that that is what the president is
doing if you live in the media bubble. Trump's MAGA agenda
is an anathema to the managerial class.
To quote Reno one final
time:
The next decade will not
be easy. But it will not be about what preoccupied us in the
sixties, and which Caldwell describes so well. Rather than the
perils of discrimination we are increasingly concerned with the problem of
disintegration — or in Charles Murray's terms, the problem of "coming
apart."
Trump and the GOP he is
molding are the vehicles to restore and strengthen national
solidarity. Trump said at the Daytona 500,
"No matter who wins, what matters most is God, family, and
country." That is not the Democrat agenda. As
seen in Democrat politicians, their policies, and the behavior of their major
contributors, the aim is to further weaken the social and national bonds in
America. There is a lot at stake here. If solidarity
wins, the Republic can survive and prosper. If the Democrats
and their wealthy cohorts do, then the middle class withers, the Republic
dies, and the rich and their managerial class get to rule the
roost. That is what it comes down to.
ALL BILLIONAIRES ARE DEMOCRATS. ALL BILLIONAIRES WANT WIDER OPEN
BORDERS, AMNESTY AND HELL NO TO E-VERIFY!
In addition, establishment Republicans are no better than
Democrats at stemming the flow of illegal immigration because big
businesses reap
the benefits of this cheap labor without
incurring any of the social costs.
This is why the SEIU supports blanket amnesty for illegal aliens.
Democrats: The Party of Big Labor, Big
Government...and Big Business
There
is a widespread perception that the Democrat Party is the party the working
class and the Republican Party is the party of big business. Even
though Republicans on average received slightly more from corporate employees
prior to 2002, the overall difference between both parties from 1990 to 2020 is
statistically insignificant (Table 1). In fact, Democrat
reliance on big labor gradually shifted toward big business following the
involvement of solidly Democrat corporate giants in 2002, and from 2014 to
2020, Democrats consistently surpassed Republicans in corporate donations
(Tables 1 & 2).
Based
on data compiled by Open Secrets, Soros Fund Management, Fahr LLC (Tom Steyer),
and Bloomberg LP ranked among the top ten for political contributions that gave
over 90% to Democrats. In sharp contrast, the right-leaning Koch
Industries made the top ten only in 2014. In nearly all other years,
Koch ranked well below the top twenty.
Whether
or not this trend is long-term, there is no denying that large corporations on
average no longer lean right. But what does it mean to be "the
party of big business"? Donations are not definitive
evidence. What ultimately matters is what politicians do once they
get elected.
Many
liberals believe that big government is needed to "rein in" big
business and that in the absence of federal intervention, corporations will
"run roughshod" over the average American. Many liberals
also believe that corporations are the main beneficiaries of laissez-faire
economics and that free-market conservatives who want to scale back regulations
are somehow "in the pocket" of big business.
In
reality, the opposite is true: big business and big government
go
hand in hand because government meddling in the economy
for
the lobbyists. This crony capitalism grew exponentially as
during
the 1930s. Establishment politicians and well
connected corporations
are beneficiaries of the myth that big
government
and big business are adversaries because it hides
their
unholy alliance.
In
all fairness, neither party has had a monopoly on the dispensation of corporate
welfare: the TARP funds that propped up financial institutions deemed "too
big to fail" during the Great Recession were released by the Bush
administration. In addition, establishment Republicans are no better than
Democrats at stemming the flow of illegal immigration because big
businesses reap the benefits of this cheap labor
without incurring any of the social costs.
If
both parties are playing this game, what is the basis for labeling the Democrat
party "the party of big business"? What policies from
Republicans support small business?
Free-market
conservatism benefits small businesses because the government does not pick the
winners and losers by means of subsidies, tax breaks, and cumbersome
regulations. You will not see policies like these coming from
Washington in a major way because proposals for shrinking the federal
government rarely see the light of day in Congress.
Based
on data collected by Gallup and Thumbtack, red states far outscore blue states
in small business friendliness (Table 3). This may be why less
affluent Americans are fleeing states that score abysmally like California, Illinois, New York, and Hawaii. This might
also be why small business–owners are more likely to vote Republican.
The
Trump administration has been good for businesses of all sizes mainly due to
the unprecedented rate at which it scaled back stifling regulations. This may be
why some of the president's highest approval ratings now come
from small businesses.
Donald
Trump set himself apart from the ruling class when he latched onto the
third-rail issue of illegal immigration and called out the corporate darling Jeb Bush (AKA
"Low Energy Jeb") for his lack of grassroots support. This
may explain in part why Bain Capital, the firm co-founded by Mitt Romney,
switched teams and contributed solidly Democrat in 2018. In 2012,
Democrats accused Bain Capital of destroying jobs by systematically dismantling
the companies it bought off. Times have changed...
Small
businesses generate well over half of all new jobs. Most
importantly, many are family-owned, have strong ties to their communities, and
provide upward mobility for millions of Americans who never attended
college. The Democrats' undermining of this quintessentially
American institution is shameful and disqualifies it as the "party of the
working class." Contributions from big labor do not count
toward "labor-friendliness" because mega-unions care more about
recruitment than about the welfare of working Americans. This is why the SEIU
supports blanket amnesty for illegal aliens.
Democrats
fed up with the corporate status quo are now choosing their own
anti-establishment candidate, not realizing that socialism is just a more
impoverished version of the crony capitalism they are
rejecting. Many Sanders-supporters are also morally shallow because
they want to harness the power of the state to muscle in on the wealth of
Americans who borrowed responsibly and worked hard to pay their bills.
After
the Constitutional Convention, Benjamin Franklin said, "This Constitution ... is
likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in
despotism ... when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic
government." If Democrats implement the dystopian policies of
California on a national level, their corporate allies will do
fine. It is small business–owners and working-class Americans with
nowhere to flee who have the most to lose. Be careful what you wish for.
To view the tables below, click the links.
*The red lettering highlights a funding
advantage for Republicans. The blue lettering highlights a funding
disadvantage for Republicans.
**Based on a T-test, the difference is
insignificant at P = 0.46
Table 2: Top ten contributors to Democrats and Republicans by category
(union, corporate, and ideological) as compiled by Open Secrets:
*In 2008 Goldman Sachs donated 74% to
Democrats. All other groups in this column donated between 40 and
69% to both parties. This column does not differentiate between
giving equally to both parties and giving 70–79% to Democrats or Republicans.
**This number includes the "City of
New York." Although it is officially listed as
"other" by Open Secrets (not corporate, union, or ideological), I was
personally informed by someone from the organization that Michael Bloomberg was
the main source of this funding.
Table 3: Small business scores states scored by Thumbtack ranked
according to their Democratic advantage by Gallup:
*GPA scores are based on the following
numerical equivalents: A = 4, B = 3, C = 2, D = 1, F = 0, A+ = 4.3, A- = 3.7,
etc.
** Not scored.
***Mean GPA ± standard error. Based on a
T-test, the difference is significant at P = 0.00001.
THE OBAMA –
BIDEN BANKSTERS CON JOB STARTED BEFORE HIS FIRST DAY IN OFFICE!
GET THIS
BOOK!
Obamanomics:
How Barack Obama Is Bankrupting You and Enriching His Wall Street Friends,
Corporate Lobbyists, and Union Bosses
BY TIMOTHY P
CARNEY
Editorial
Reviews
Obama Is
Making You Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?
Goldman Sachs, GE, Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same
“special interests” Barack Obama was supposed to chase from the temple—are
profiting handsomely from Obama’s Big Government policies that crush taxpayers,
small businesses, and consumers. In Obamanomics, investigative reporter Timothy
P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media ignores and the White House wishes
you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and Change, Obama is delivering corporate
socialism to America, all while claiming he’s battling corporate America. It’s
corporate welfare and regulatory robbery—it’s Obamanomics.
Congressman Ron Paul says, “Every libertarian and free-market
conservative needs to read Obamanomics.” And Johan Goldberg, columnist and
bestselling author says, “Obamanomics is conservative muckraking at its best
and an indispensable field guide to the Obama years.”
If you’ve wondered what’s happening to America, as the
federal government swallows up the financial sector, the auto industry, and
healthcare, and enacts deficit exploding “stimulus packages,” this book makes
it all clear—it’s a big scam. Ultimately, Obamanomics boils down to this: every
time government gets bigger, somebody’s getting rich, and those somebodies are
friends of Barack. This book names the names—and it will make your blood boil.
Investigative reporter Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the
mainstream media ignores and the White House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather
than Hope and Change, Obama is delivering corporate socialism to America, all
while claiming he’s battling corporate America. It’s corporate welfare and
regulatory robbery—it’s Obamanomics. In this explosive book, Carney reveals:
* The Great
Health Care Scam—Obama’s backroom deals with drug companies spell corporate
profits and more government control
* The Global
Warming Hoax—Obama has bought off industries with a pork-filled bill that will
drain your wallet for Al Gore’s agenda
* Obama and
Wall Street—“Change” means more bailouts and a heavy Goldman Sachs presence in
the West Wing (including Rahm Emanuel)
*
Stimulating K Street—The largest spending bill in history gave pork to the well-connected
and created a feeding frenzy for lobbyists
* How the
GOP needs to change its tune—drastically—to battle Obamanomics
Praise
for Obamanomics
“The notion that ‘big business’ is on the side of the free
market is one of progressivism’s most valuable myths. It allows them to
demonize corporations by day and get in bed with them by night. Obamanomics is
conservative muckraking at its best. It reveals how President Obama is
exploiting the big business mythology to undermine the free market and stick it
to entrepreneurs, taxpayers, and consumers. It’s an indispensable field guide
to the Obama years.”
—Jonha Goldberg, LA Times columnist and best-selling author
“‘Every time government gets bigger, somebody’s getting
rich.’ With this astute observation, Tim Carney begins his task of laying bare
the Obama administration’s corporatist governing strategy, hidden behind the
president’s populist veneer. This meticulously researched book is a must-read
for anyone who wants to understand how Washington really works.”
—David Freddoso, best-selling author of The Case Against
Barack Obama
“Every libertarian and free-market conservative who still
believes that large corporations are trusted allies in the battle for economic
liberty needs to read this book, as does every well-meaning liberal who
believes that expansions of the welfare-regulatory state are done to benefit
the common people.”
—Congressman Ron Paul
“It’s understandable for critics to condemn President Obama
for his ‘socialism.’ But as Tim Carney shows, the real situation is at once
more subtle and more sinister. Obamanomics favors big business while
disproportionately punishing everyone else. So-called progressives are too
clueless to notice, as usual, which is why we have Tim Carney and this book.”
—Thomas E. Woods, Jr., best-selling author of Meltdown and
The Politically Incorrect Guide™ to American History
*
• Hardcover: 256 pages
• Publisher: Regnery Press (November 30,
2009)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 1596986123
• ISBN-13: 978-1596986121
No comments:
Post a Comment