To distract from the increase of price for household goods, Axios reported the White House is “more interested in touting the lowest level of jobless claims during the pandemic, with 376,000 people filing for first-time unemployment benefits last week.”....AS HE SABOTAGES HOMELAND SECURITY TO FLOOD AMERICA WITH ENDLESS HORDES OF 'CEAP' LABOR.
We're Not Going Back to a 1970s Economy. It's Worse than That.
Comparisons are being made of our current economy to that of the Jimmy Carter presidency of the 1970s. President Biden's policies appear to parallel those of the Carter administration. We haven't heard the term "stagflation" in the news for the past forty years. That's the term for high unemployment and high inflation. It's measured by what is called the Philips Curve. There certainly are similarities to our present economy and that of the 1970s.
Presently we are looking at inflation, slow job growth, shortages of materials, and even long lines for gasoline. While the gasoline shortage was only a temporary one affecting only a portion of the country, it was caused by a pipeline shutdown. This was exacerbated by the fact that President Biden shut down the Keystone Pipeline his first day in office. Prices, however, continue to rise due to the lessening of supply.
Did the poor economy of the 1970s begin under Jimmy Carter? Not really. Looking back, we know that as early as President Nixon's first term, he imposed a wage-price freeze on the United States. On the night of August 15, 1971, he made that announcement in a nationally televised address. We were also hit with the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) oil embargo of 1973. This led to long gasoline lines, gasoline rationing, and inflation caused by an increase in the cost of oil.
This inflation lasted throughout the 1970s. President Ford, who completed the last year and a half of the Nixon presidency, made attempts to deal with inflation. His means of dealing with it was to have people wear WIN buttons. WIN stood for "Whip Inflation Now." Some people might say it was as effective against inflation as a mask mandate is in stopping a pandemic.
Given these facts, should we conclude that the Carter administration's policies were the chief cause of the poor economy of the 1970s? His policies certainly did not help matters. But Nixon's wage-price freeze led only to further inflation. President Ford's feckless campaign was intended to induce a positive attitude which he hoped would propel the nation through the poor economy the same way the V for Victory Campaign kept people positive during World War Two. No, while all these attempts at defeating inflation, high unemployment, long gas lines, and an energy crisis, were basically unsuccessful, the real blame for the economy of the 1970s firmly belongs on the policies of the 36th president of the United States: Lyndon Baines Johnson.
In May 1964, President Johnson announced, in an address at the University of Michigan, his plan for the United States. He called it the Great Society. It's been called Johnson's version of Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal. Although he may have announced the plan in 1964, the many aspects of the plan and its effect on the economy did not take place until just before President Nixon's administration. Prior to that, the economy of the nation was growing steadily due to President Kennedy's implementation of tax reform.
President Kennedy lowered the tax rates. As he stated, "a rising tide raises all boats." The real key to Kennedy's tax plan was not just the tax cut, but the Investment Tax Credit. These changes, improvements, to the tax law are largely responsible for the great economy the United States had during the 1960s. This was true despite the escalation of the Vietnam War over the same period. All this came to an end when Johnson implemented his Great Society.
The cost of this continues today. In 2014, the Heritage Foundation published a report disclosing that 22 trillion dollars had been spent on the Great Society programs in an effort to eradicate poverty. That amount is three times the cost of all military wars in U.S. history. While there has been an improvement in that regard, there is hardly the benefit that was intended.
The poor economy of the 1970s can be traced not to Jimmy Carter, but to Lyndon Johnson. With the spending that the Biden administration is implementing and, even more, that it has proposed, a return to the stagflation of the 1970s may be mild in comparison to what we can expect to get from policies of the current Congress.
The same can be said of the shutting of the Keystone Pipeline and canceling of domestic drilling and oil production. These actions could have results that make the gas shortages of the 1970s pale in comparison.
There is another policy of the Biden administration that is similar to a law passed in 1965: the Hart-Celler Act. This was known as the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. This act changed dramatically the immigration policy of the United States. Our immigration policy went from one of bringing in immigrants who could contribute to the betterment of the country to one in which immigrants were chosen by where they came from.
It is similar to the fiasco that Biden created on our southern border with his reversal of President Trump's immigration policies. The three executive orders he signed to this effect place more financial strain on the nation. With jobs going to illegals and illegals receiving benefits at taxpayer expense, there is added cost placed on our economy.
The American philosopher George Santayana said, "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." This was stated in his work, The Life of Reason: Reason in Common Sense. The political left seems to do this all the time and is quick to give the same excuse when confronted with the truth: "It didn't work in the past because we didn't throw enough money at it."
We may be returning to the economy of the 1970s, but that poor economic period had its roots in the 1960s. If we are witnessing what has been compared to the 1970s, what does our future have in store for us? What roots are we planting now? The bill proposed at this time by the Biden administration and the Democrats in Congress is for six trillion dollars in spending. This alone is more than 25% of the amount the Great Society spent in its first fifty years. While that is unadjusted for inflation, the point remains. That doesn't include the trillions spent in the previous year due to the COVID pandemic. Are we witnessing the Great Society on steroids?
David Ennocenti is a retired accountant and graduate of the State University of N.Y. at Buffalo, School of Management, with a degree in accounting and finance. He passed the CPA examination in 1983. His writing has appeared in American Thinker, USA Today, The New York Times, and several other publications.
Image via Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain.
To comment, you can find the MeWe post for this article here.
Nolte: Failed Bidenomics Threatens to Return Us to Jimmy Carter’s 1970s
Writing in the New York Post, Charles Gasparino warns, “The Biden administration keeps insisting inflation is ‘transient,’ but there are now real signs that inflation is here and possibly for the long haul.”
“Thursday’s consumer price index increase of 5 percent year-on-year — its highest level in 13 years — is the latest and most visible piece of evidence that this scourge is making a comeback,” he adds.
The most important point he makes is this: “Inflation is a regressive tax that hits hardest at working-class and poor Americans.”
Inflation brutalizes the working class and poor, as do spiking energy prices, which are included in inflation measures, but also cause much of it. It’s not only the cost of electricity and topping your gas tank; it’s the cost of manufacturing and, most especially, transporting all the goods and services we purchase.
So it’s vital to focus on energy costs, not only for the reasons above, but also because His Fraudulency Joe Biden is waging war on oil, specifically America’s status as an energy-independent exporter.
The reasons for this crippling inflation are not difficult to discern. Because the federal government is paying millions of Americans not to work (even though the country’s reopening), an artificial labor shortage is artificially inflating wages, which increases the cost of everything else. On top of that, the federal government is pouring trillions and trillions of dollars into the economy, which is now totally unnecessary, as Gasparino points out. With the country finally reopening, the economy will grow just fine on its own without all this cheap money, which creates inflation.
Now, at this point, you might be thinking, Yeah, but wages are increasing. How is that a bad thing?
Well, what good are higher wages if inflation eats it all up. Earnings are actually down in this country and have been for five months.
What’s so fascinating about all of this is that as Biden barrels America’s economic train towards its inevitable wreck, none of the above is debatable. It not like we have experts who will argue massive government spending, artificially high wages, and zero percent interest rates won’t produce inflation. Of course, they will. And yet, out of one side of his racist mouth, Biden insists this inflation we’ve not seen since the 2008 crash (which was also caused by the government meddling in the economy by way of Fannie and Freddie) is “transient,” while out of the other side of his racist mouth, he continues to call for a trillion — with a “T” — government spending plans.
Inflation is sure not going to be “transient” if you keep the tidal waves of cheap money rolling in.
Inflation might actually be “transient” if the administration ceases the policies causing it, but it won’t. Even with our massive labor shortage, the boosted federal unemployment benefits will march on into September. This makes zero sense.
As someone who grew up in the 1970s, who turned 14 a few months after the decade ended, there were many fabulous things about that decade. Americans had finally had enough of the pompous, self-important 1960s and had themselves a blast. Of course, the civil rights movement (which I, of course, excluded from the category of “pompous, self-important”) brought a country closer together that was, at long last, ready just to have a good time. Goodbye Joan Baez, hello Led Zeppelin. Goodbye protest songs, hello rock n’ roll, and disco. Goodbye Woodstock, hello Studio 54.
It was one of the freest decades in American history, maybe the freest. I’d gladly pay six bucks for a gallon of gas and four bucks for a loaf of bread if it brought back All in the Family, Blazing Saddles, Saturday Night Fever, Blondie, Warhol, a proudly sexist James Bond, R-rated T&A, John Belushi, roller derby, George Carlin, and the great American ability to collectively laugh at ourselves and, most especially, our sacred cows. But that’s me… The cost of inflation on struggling Americans, those who live on the margins, is brutal and oftentimes crippling. It’s just not worth it, and it doesn’t have to happen — unless His Fraudulency wants it to.
Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC. Follow his Facebook Page here
After Inflation Earnings of Americans Have Declined in Every Month of the Biden Presidency
The real earnings of American workers fell for the fifth consecutive month in May as inflation erased all of the month’s wage gains and more.
Real average hourly earnings for working Americans fell 0.1 percent in May compared with April, data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics released Thursday show.
This decline in real earnings occurred even though average hourly earnings increased as employers scrambled to fill open positions. What happened was that these wage gains were more than offset by the increase of 0.6 percent in the Consumer Price Index. So Americans were paid more but those gains were swamped by inflation.
Average weekly real earnings fell as well, dropping to $334.09 from $335.60, even though there was no change in the average hours worked.
The wage decline was even more pronounced for workers the government describes as “production and nonsupervisory employees”—in other words, not the bosses. These workers saw a 0.2 percent decline in May because their 0.4 percent wage increase was overwhelmed by the rise in prices.
Real average weekly earnings for these employees fell 0.4 percent over the month due to the change in real average hourly earnings combined with a decrease of 0.3 percent in average weekly hours.
This was the fifth consecutive month in which inflation-adjusted hourly earnings fell and the fourth in which weekly earnings fell. As a result, after inflation earnings of Americans have declined in every month in which Joe Biden has been president. This is the longest consecutive string of monthly real earnings declines in records going back to 2007, matching the five month decline seen last year at height of pandemic lockdowns.
US cost of living surges while wages stagnate
An unprecedented rise in prices for necessities is making it increasingly difficult for workers in the United States and internationally to make ends meet.
The cost of basic commodities such as used vehicles, food, furniture, clothes, plane tickets, recreational goods, insurance and alcohol have all risen. The surge in prices drove the US inflation rate, as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), to a 13-year high of 5 percent in May, up from 4.2 percent the previous month.
The CPI jumped 0.6 percent last month, marking the fourth significant monthly increase in a row. Record prices for used vehicles, driven by a shortage of raw materials, accounted for approximately one-third of the overall increase in May. Prices climbed 7.3 percent after a 10 percent increase in April. The Manheim used car index hit 203 in May, which represents a 48.2 percent increase in used car prices over the last year.
Energy has also been a big driver of inflation, with prices soaring over 29 percent in the past year. For example, a gallon of regular gas currently costs an average of $3.10 nationwide, after the price fell under $2.00 per gallon after the pandemic hit.
Globally, housing prices have experienced the fastest growth rate since 2006, when home prices peaked amid the US housing bubble. According to the Knight Frank Global House Price Index, the average home price across 56 countries and territories rose 7.3 percent in the year to March 2021. Thirteen countries registered double-digit increases, with developing nations comprising most of the top-ten.
With a 32 percent year-over-year increase, Turkey saw the largest price increase. New Zealand and Luxembourg followed with 22.1 percent and 16.6 percent increases, respectively. The US experienced the fifth-largest increase as housing prices climbed 13.2 percent in the year to March.
Grocery prices rose by 0.4 percent in May and are expected to continue rising for some time. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization reported world food prices rose by 40 percent over the past year, including a rise of 4.8 percent since April. The United Nations World Food Program warned the increase in food prices is driving food insecurity, with 270 million people suffering from acute malnutrition or worse across 79 countries.
Rents in the US, which account for the single largest expense for most workers, rose 0.2 percent in May, the largest increase in over a year. Rents have gone up 1.8 percent in the last year. Economists state rent prices have risen slowly partly because of moratoriums on evictions. However, it is unclear what will happen to prices when the restrictions expire.
According to an American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) report, prescription drug prices increased at twice the US inflation rate in 2020. Although widely used brand-name prescription drugs saw their slowest annual price increase in 2020, the AARP reported the 2.9 percent increase in medication costs is still twice the country’s general inflation rate of 1.3 percent. The findings showed insurance-negotiated prices of 260 brand-name prescription drugs have increased, on average, faster than general inflation every year since 2006.
Workers are seeing their purchasing power decline at the same time essential goods are becoming more expensive.
Writing for The Hill, economic historian Dr. Tyler Goodspeed calculated real wages for US workers have declined every month in the last year, eroded by significant month-over-month increases in overall consumer prices.
The high rate of inflation completely erases the nominal increases in hourly earning within the last year. According to data provided by the United States Department of Labor, average hourly earnings rose from $29.74 to $30.33 from May 2020 to May 2021, a nominal increase of less than 2 percent. With a year-to-year inflation rate of 5 percent, this means workers have seen their real wages decline by more than 3 percent within the past year.
Last month’s jobs report and the broad surge in the cost of living indicate growing hardship among workers in the US, despite President Joe Biden’s claim that the report represented “great news” about the economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Labor Department reported US employers added 559,000 jobs in May, missing the 650,000 analysts predicted. May’s shortfall marked the second row in a month job gains missed expectations. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate declined 0.3 percentage points to 5.8 percent, the lowest since companies began mass layoffs in March 2020.
Even with these gains, the US economy has 7.6 million fewer workers compared to the February 2020 pre-pandemic level. So far, the US has only recovered 14.7 million, or 65 percent, of the 22.4 million jobs lost last spring.
The Biden Administration and corporate media claimed the distribution of vaccines would accelerate economic recovery, but 53,000 Americans dropped out of the labor force, ticking the participation rate down from 61.7 percent to 61.6 percent despite 48 of 50 states reopening or having completely reopened.
While everything is becoming more expensive for workers, those who own stock and other property are becoming ever wealthier.
The S&P 500 rose to an all-time high on Thursday, climbing nearly 0.5 percent to a record closing high of 4,239.18. The Dow Jones Industrial Average advanced 19.10 points, or less than 0.1 percent, to 34,466.24, while the Nasdaq Composite gained about 0.8 percent to 14,020.33.
Corporate lobbyists and the Republican Party have wailed vociferously that the federal supplemental unemployment benefits were encouraging workers to remain idle instead of taking jobs. The reality is workers are facing numerous challenges, including an ongoing pandemic which continues to sicken thousands and kill an average of 400 people every day in the US, concerns over child care and the need for higher-paying jobs. According to the Labor Department, about 4 million US workers quit their jobs in April to search for better pay.
The rapid rise in inflation will lead to an intensification of the class struggle as workers demand higher wages to ensure they can make ends meet. This is already being seen in the actions of nearly 3,000 Volvo workers in Dublin, Virginia, who have twice rejected sellout contracts pushed by the UAW and corporate management and are currently on their second strike in as many months, as well as the 1,100 coal miners on strike at Warrior Met in northwest Alabama who are demanding the restoration of wages lost over the last six years.
Worries About Big Ticket Item Inflation Hit Worse Level Since 1982
The last time Americans were this unhappy about prices of big-ticket purchases was 1982, when the Federal Reserve was fighting a war against double-digit inflation.
The University of Michigan’s survey of consumer sentiment showed U.S. consumers more concerned with higher prices of appliances, houses, and cars than anytime in 39 years, according to the survey’s chief economist Richard Curtin.
The survey records spontaneous mentions of prices of these major purchases and subtracts comments about higher prices from comments about lower prices. The difference has plummeted this year, indicating a huge imbalance in the comments due to a much larger volume of comments on higher prices.
“Spontaneous references to market prices for homes, vehicles, and household durables fell to their worst level since the all-time record in November 1974,” Curtin said. “These unfavorable perceptions of market prices reduced overall buying attitudes for vehicles and homes to their lowest point since 1982.”
Curtin said concern over prices of these categories was especially high among the top-third of earners. These consumers are responsible for more than half of retail sales.
The price of used cars rose by 7.3 percent in May, following a 10 percent gain in April. Home prices have hit record highs. Appliance prices are up 12.3 percent from a year ago, according to the most recent report on the Consumer Price Index.
Despite the worsening of this measure, overall consumer expectations moderated in the first weeks of June. The preliminary June survey showed expectations for inflation declining a bit from May, both in the one-year forecast and the five-year forecast. Even with the decline, however, expectations for the next year remain at their highest point in a decade.
Consumer sentiment improved in early June, the survey showed. The index rose to 86.4, up from 82.9 at the end of May. That was better than expected. But the gain was mostly due to increases in the experience and expectations of upper and middle income households, raising doubts about whether the Biden administration’s policies are benefiting lower-income households.
Both the current condition measure and the expectations gauge rose in early June.
“Consumer sentiment rose in early June, recouping two-thirds of May’s loss,” Curtin said. “The early June gain was mainly among middle and upper income households and for future economic prospects rather than current conditions.”
In early June, the government reported that businesses posted a record number of job openings in April, almost a million more than they had a month before. Not surprisingly, a record-high share of consumers anticipates unemployment to keep falling.
“Stronger growth in the national economy was anticipated, with an all-time record number of consumers anticipating a net decline in unemployment,” Curtin said.
Focus Group: Few Voters Believe U.S. Economy Is ‘Booming’ amid Rising Inflation
A focus group indicated Thursday only 3 of 13 voters said they felt the U.S. economy is “booming” amid rising inflation concerns.
The focus group by Engagious/Schlesinger and first reported by Axios suggested the other ten respondents “expressed fear of an impending crash following the injection of federal stimulus money during the pandemic.”
The focus group also found the following two results:
- Eight of the 13 voters said they are apprehensive about inflation in their area, citing costs going up in a number of sectors, including groceries, gas, oil and real estate.
- 10 of the 13 voters are worried about the national debt. They fear tax hikes and believe that Social Security is at stake.
The concern of inflation, which hurts the poorest Americans by making the few dollars they possess worthless in terms of purchasing power, comes as the Consumer Price Index jumped five percent in May from a year ago, the fastest rise since 2008.
The index is used to measure a basket of consumer goods and services purchased by households and is correlated with inflation.
Some economic analysts worry inflation could go on for longer than expected because of the combination of very low interest rates, pent up consumer demand for goods and services, a particularly large budget deficit, and the release of excess savings built up by stimulus payments.
To distract from the increase of price for household goods, Axios reported the White House is “more interested in touting the lowest level of jobless claims during the pandemic, with 376,000 people filing for first-time unemployment benefits last week.”
In consideration of the employment rate, some of the respondents in the focus group spoke to their decision to become employed instead of relying on government subsidies or unemployment benefits.
“It was really tempting to say ‘no,’ because I made more from unemployment than I do from my part-time job,” Kelli V. stated as respondent number one.
“I know a couple people who didn’t lose their jobs but were talking about how they wish they could. They were hoping they would get laid off (to collect unemployment),” Holly, respondent number two, said.
On May 14, Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy asked Republican governors to opt out of the federal programs in a letter to entice people back into the labor force and off the dole.
ang: ‘Return to the Obama Years’ Not Enough for Biden — They Were Left Behind in Those Years,’ ‘They’re Pissed Off’
Late Tuesday on CNN, former Democratic presidential hopeful Andrew Yang, now a CNN contributor, warned that his old opponent, former Vice President Joe Biden could not defeat Trump with just a pledge to return to the years of former President Barack Obama alone.
According to Yang, it needed to start with an understanding of what problems facing the country led to Trump’s presidency.
“Donald Trump needs to be defeated,” he explained. “Forty-two percent of my supporters said they would not support the Democratic nominee in the general, in large part because when I ran, I ran for the problems that predated Trump. Like, Donald Trump would never be our president today if things were going well for a lot of people around the country. Bernie Sanders would not have almost been the nominee last time if things were going well for people around the country. So even as Joe Biden saying, ‘Hey, we need to defeat Donald Trump,’ he also has to say, ‘Look, things have not been working for millions of Americans, and after we defeat Donald Trump,’ we need to get deep into these problems, get our hands dirty and solve them. This can’t be a, ‘Hey, I’m better than Trump’ race. It has to be, ‘Hey. I understand how Trump became our president.'”
Yang told a CNN panel people were left behind in the Obama-Biden years, and they were not happy about it. He called on Biden to recognize that situation and address it, which he said would better his chances in the 2020 general election.
“I think he’s been talking about restoring a culture, tone and a soul of the country,” Yang added. “I was talking about putting more money in Americans’ hands because I saw we decimated entire ways of life in Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin. And because I was talking in those terms about the real problems these people have experienced, again, 42% of my supporters were not going to support the Democratic nominee. I’m hoping that we can get some of those people to support Joe. But it would be helpful if Joe acknowledged it because one of the weaknesses of saying, ‘Hey, return to Obama years’ is that there are many Americans who were getting behind in those years, too, and they’re pissed off. And so, if you say, I’m going to revert, that loses to that group of people. There are so many Americans who just don’t think their institutions are working for him at all, and Joe Biden’s’s weakness is he represents those institutions. I’m endorsing Joe. We need Joe to beat Trump. But we’ll have a much better chance of that if Joe recognizes that our institutions have been failing many Americans for a long time.”
Obama’s State of Delusion ... OR JUST ANOTHER "Hope & Change" HOAX?
22 January 2015
”The delusional character of Obama’s State of the Union
address on Tuesday—presenting an America of rising living
standards and a booming economy, capped by his declaration
that the “shadow of crisis has passed”—is perhaps matched
only in its presentation by the media and supporters of the
Democratic Party.”
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/01/oxfam-richest-one-percent-set-to.html
“The general tone was set by the New York Times in its lead editorial on Wednesday, which described the speech as a “simple, dramatic message about economic fairness, about the fact that the well-off—the top earners, the big banks, Silicon Valley—have done just great, while middle and working classes remain dead in the water.”
OBAMANOMICS:
The report observes that while the wealth of the world’s 80 richest people doubled between 2009 and 2014, the wealth of the poorest half of the world’s population (3.5 billion people) was lower in 2014 than it was in 2009.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/01/oxfam-richest-one-percent-set-to.html
In 2010, it took 388 billionaires to match the wealth of the bottom half of the earth’s population; by 2013, the figure had fallen to just 92 billionaires. It fell to 80 in 2014.
THE OBAMA ASSAULT ON THE AMERICAN MIDDLE-CLASS
“The goal of the Obama administration, working with the Republicans and local governments, is to roll back the living conditions of the vast majority of the population to levels not seen since the 19th century, prior to the advent of the eight-hour day, child labor laws, comprehensive public education, pensions, health benefits, workplace health and safety regulations, etc.”
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/01/oxfam-richest-one-percent-set-to.html
“In response to the ruthless assault of the financial oligarchy, spearheaded by Obama, the working class must advance, no less ruthlessly, its own policy.”
No comments:
Post a Comment