THE LAWLESS LAWYER CLASS - PIG LAWYER DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALVIN BRAGG - Would Alvin Bragg be wrecking Manhattan if the voters had known about this before the election?

BLOG EDITOR

THE LAWYER CLASS: IS IT THE GREATEST THREAT AMERICA FACES?

Our definition of a lawyer is one who is institutionally trained in law school to LIE, CHEAT, COMMIT PERJURY, ORCHESTRATE PERJURY and ultimately GAME THE LEGAL SYSTEM. While they perpetrate these actions the lawyer will be sucking the blood out of their clients or the Nation itself. We only have to look at the political lives of lawyer Joe Biden, his lawyer son, Hunter Biden, and his lawyer brother, James Biden as well as bribes sucking sociopath lawyer Kamala Harris and her parasite lawyer  husband, Douglas Emhoff.

We are all familiar with the staggering lawless regime of Barack Obama, describes as a sociopath by Ben Carson, M.D., and then there is the crime dual of Bill Clinton (impeached and disbarred),  and his partner in crime Hillary Clinton described by Julian Assange as a “sadistic sociopath”.

This blog has dedicated a substantial amount of time to exposing the crimes of these gamer lawyers and the institutions that enable, protect and abet their criminality.

Lawyers are substantially nothing but parasites feeding on America and, as a class, constitute this Nation’s greatest threat to democracy and the American middle class.

The LAWYER CLASS is comprised of the entire Judicial, from servants of Wall Street on the Supreme Court, the bribes sucking lawyer-politicians who exist to serve primarily banksters, and billionaires and all the way down to the lowest sociopath lawyer-judges who exist to protect the special interests, primarily the business interests and to game the laws, which for lawyer do not really exist, for that judge’s particular special interests. That said, there is no special interest more important to the LAWYER CLASS than lawyers themselves.

 

Soros Group Knew of "Serious Allegation" by Woman Against Pro-Crime Manhattan DA. Did Nothing.

Thu Feb 10, 2022 

Daniel Greenfield

 2 comments

Would Alvin Bragg be wrecking Manhattan if the voters had known about this before the election?

A disturbing allegation against Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg during the primary led a George Soros-backed political action committee, Color Of Change, to pull a half-million dollars in funding from his campaign last spring, DailyMail.com can now reveal.

The fact that any allegation led them to do that is unexpected. Joe Biden had a serious sexual assault allegation lodged against him and everyone just kept on going. It took multiple allegations to derail Franken and Cuomo. Keith Ellison survived two allegations.

(Soros personally made a point of bemoaning Franken's resignation and attacking Democrats who urged him to step down.)

Did Color of Change have an attack of conscience or were they assuming that the story would come out and sink Bragg anyway?

The group was just ramping up its efforts in May, reaching out to New York City voters, when a woman on the list made a serious allegation against Bragg, 48, multiple sources told DailyMail.com.

'It threw a wrench into the PAC that was just gearing up,' one source said.

The woman shared her allegation via text message, according to a source inside Color Of Change.

'Color Of Change PAC responded to her initial message, but did not receive any further communications, so had no basis to evaluate the credibility of her allegation,' that source said.

That's strange and implausible.

I don't see COC pulling a big push for Bragg because of a one-time text message that wasn't even backed up. Unless the woman's name along invested the allegation with a whole lot of credibility. In other words this wasn't just "someone" on the list. But "Someone".

DA Bragg told DailyMail.com, responding the claim, 'I have held myself to the highest standards my entire life and the suggestion that I did something disturbing is patently false.'

Something "disturbing". That's a vague thing to deny unless you know exactly what it is you're denying.

A source familiar with the allegation told DailyMail.com that he finds it hard to believe the political action committee would cut its funding to Bragg without vetting the allegation, at least a little bit.

'I think they made a really ugly decision to semi-absolve themselves by dropping him without making any sort of announcement.' 

And made sure to keep it quiet, protecting themselves instead of protecting New Yorkers. But isn't that what pro-crime policies are all about?