Thursday, June 9, 2022

OAKLAND, A CITY OF STAGGERING BLACK VIOLENCE AND CRIME ANNOUNCES THAT 'RACISM IS A PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS' - BUT NOT BLACK DRUG DEALERS AND MURDERERS???

ONLY 8% OF THE POPULATION OF SAN FRANCISCO IS BLACK, YET THEY PERPETRATE 40% OF THE CRIMES. THESE ARE PRE-COVID NUMBERS BEFORE CAR JACKING AND STORE LOOTING BECAME COMMONPLACE IN S.F., ALL PERPERTRATED BY BLACKS. THE STORE  LOOTING BY BLACKS IS SO BAD WALGREENS HAD TO CLOSE DOWN SEVERAL STORES.


Last year, Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf announced a special program to provide a $500-per-month grant to 600 poor “BIPOC” (black, indigenous and people of color) families, discriminating against white families in violation of the U.S. Constitution and the state constitution.

In April, a black nationalist terrorist named Frank James opened fire on the downtown N subway train in Manhattan. While the racist gunman had a large stockpile of weapons, he happened to use a Glock pistol that he had bought over ten years ago. Now Glock is being sued.

Oakland neighborhood plagued by brazen crimes




I drove into Oakland, California's Most DANGEROUS Hoods. It was nuts.





Oakland Declares Racism a ‘Public Health Crisis’

Demonstrators burn garbage in Oakland, Calif., on Friday, May 29, 2020, while protesting the Monday death of George Floyd, a handcuffed black man in police custody in Minneapolis. (AP Photo/Noah Berger)
AP Photo/Noah Berger
2:55

The City of Oakland, California, declared racism to be a “public health crisis” in a unanimous vote of the city council on Tuesday, allocating $350,000 to hire a consultant and data analyst in the Department of Race and Equity.

The San Francisco Chronicle reported:

The ordinance was introduced by the city attorney, Barbara Parker, City Administrator Ed Reiskin,and Darlene Flynn, the director of the department of race and equity. It was also cosponsored by Council Members Sheng ThaoLoren Taylor and Treva Reid — all of whom are running for mayor.

“The link between racism and disparate health outcomes is well-established and indisputable, and the City of Oakland wishes to join the growing number of jurisdictions across the country that have formally declared racism a public health crisis,” Parker, Flynn and Reiskin wrote in a staff report.

Parker said the two new staff members will help identify inequities in the city, and Flynn will then “develop the means, steps and procedures to advance equity.”

The Department of Racial Equity exists to “to create a city where our diversity is maintained, racial disparities have been eliminated and racial equity has been achieved.”

Last year, Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf announced a special program to provide a $500-per-month grant to 600 poor “BIPOC” (black, indigenous and people of color) families, discriminating against white families in violation of the U.S. Constitution and the state constitution.

Newsweek, fact-checking the claim that Oakland was discriminating against white households, found the claim to be “true,” adding: “The targeted nature of the grants also has a historical relevance. A form of basic income is a legacy of the Black Panther Party, which was founded in Oakland in 1966.”

The city was later forced to clarify that all residents of the city were eligible to “apply” for the grant, though “BIPOC” residents remain the focus.

In 2020, the mayor said that “nooses” found hanging from a tree were a possible hate crime, until the person who put them there, a local black resident, spoke out to say that they were exercise aids that he had placed in the tree for recreational use.

 

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). He is the author of the recent e-book, Neither Free nor Fair: The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. His recent book, RED NOVEMBER, tells the story of the 2020 Democratic presidential primary from a conservative perspective. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

Mass Shooting by Racist Criminal Leads to Lawsuit Against Gunmaker

Glocks don’t shoot people. Racist criminals do.

27 comments

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

In April, a black nationalist terrorist named Frank James opened fire on the downtown N subway train in Manhattan. While the racist gunman had a large stockpile of weapons, he happened to use a Glock pistol that he had bought over ten years ago. Now Glock is being sued.

James bought the gun in Columbus, Ohio in 2011. So he quite clearly didn’t purchase it, intending to shoot up a New York City subway train. Nevertheless the lawsuit blames the gunmaker for having "contributed to creating and maintaining a public nuisance in the State of New York" even though the gun wasn't even sold in New York.

A month later, Andrew Abdullah, a career criminal, shot and killed Daniel Enriquez, a Goldman Sachs employee, on the Q train using a Luger. It’s not the brand of gun that’s the problem.

Lugers and Glocks don’t shoot people. Racist criminals do.

And yet the lawsuit against Glock, unintentionally, lays out a much more legitimate case. The lawsuit correctly notes that James is a "black nationalist" and that "crime in the subway has increased 68% from 2022 compared to the same time in 2021".

Glock didn’t do that. Pro-crime policies by Democrats and support for black nationalism did.

The Black Lives Matter movement helped lead to the decriminalization of crime and ushered in a massive wave of violence. Criminals were freed from prison, others were no longer tried.

But the problem predates 2020.

Take James, who had a long criminal record and had done everything but take out an ad in the paper warning that he would carry out a mass shooting. In the 90s, James got a job at Curtiss-Wright, a defense contractor, where he repeatedly botched his work, refused to fix it, and blamed racism. After his racial discrimination lawsuit failed, he made violent threats against the company, but got off with a harassment charge and only one year of probation.

The court sent him to counseling: a typical "diversion" program favored by pro-crime advocates of defunding the police and abolishing the criminal justice system. The counseling program gave him a job and then fired him after "making threatening comments toward staff members."

One of his YouTube videos included "a thumbnail photo" of Anthony Ferrill. Ferrill, also a black man of around James' age, opened fire at a Coors plant, killing five white employees, after allegedly blaming racism. Instead of condemning Ferril's murderous racism, the media tried to justify it by investigating reports of a noose at the brewery.

Or, as the Washington Post put it, “Milwaukee Molson Coors Shooting Came Years After Noose" and blamed a "long-held culture of racism" by the white people whom Ferrill shot.

It’s easy to see why James might have thought his subway shooting would be similarly justified.

Beyond the racist workplace issues, James had a packed criminal record, investigated for arson, arrested four times for posession of burglary tools, and for an unstated "sex offense".

The issue isn’t whether James should have been able to buy a gun, but whether he should have been running around on the loose. This was not a case where no one saw it coming.

Everyone saw it coming.

James had spent forty years engaging in violent, threatening, and illegal behavior. It’s not Glock’s fault that New York and New Jersey failed to do anything about him. Or the legion of other violent thugs roaming major cities and occasionally opening fire with varied guns.

It’s not Glock’s fault that Democrat cities have empty prisons and streets full of criminal thugs.

After the shooting authorities found rifle magazines and ammunition. Had James not used the Glock, then instead of 10 people being wounded, they might have been killed instead.

James also had a file labeled, “By-Any-Means-Necessary-Malcolm-X” referring to the black nationalist's call for violence. The racist black Muslim leader had threatened to "strike also at whatever and whoever gets in the way."

A bunch of people on the N train got in James' way.

James took Malcolm X's advice to heart, "Too many of you don’t know what they did to you, and this is what makes you so quick to want to forget and forgive. No, brothers, when you see what has happened to you, you will never forget and you’ll never forgive. And, as I say, all of them might not be guilty. But most of them are. Most of them are."

Ilene Steur, who is suing Glock, is, like most of James' victims, white. James' bullet is still lodged in her body and because of the damage, she has trouble standing or sitting, and has been forced to use a colostomy bag. Her pain is real, but the gun that a racist bought in a pawn shop during the first term of the Obama administration didn’t cause it.

Federal, state, and city governments created a dangerous environment in which criminals like James faced few consequences and in which black nationalist hate, like the kind embraced by the racist subway gunman, was taught in schools and promoted by government agencies.

Around the time that James was getting into trouble in the 90s, the Post Office put out a Malcolm X stamp to honor the former KKK ally. And that’s without delving into the political support for more contemporary black supremacist movements like Black Lives Matter.

Glock didn’t create “a public nuisance in the State of New York" No more than Luger did. Ms. Steur would be in just as much pain if the racist shooter had used any other brand of firearm. And Daniel Enriquez would be just as dead. As her lawsuit admits, there has been a massive increase in subway crime. And urban crime in general. That’s not the doing of Luger and Glock.

If Ms. Steur wants to sue someone over her condition; she can start with the government officials who let James slide over the years and with the Democrats who wrecked the criminal justice system and embraced the black supremacist ideology that was behind James’ attack.

The Glock lawsuit is flawed in almost painfully obvious ways. It relies on a 2021 law aimed at gun manufacturers in a case where the gun in question had been purchased a decade earlier. Even if Glock had complied with the law, it would have had no impact on James’ gun. But, more importantly, it blames the gun manufacturer for a domestic terrorist attack by a violent racist criminal whose criminal past, racism, and violent nature the lawsuit carefully documents.

Racists don’t pick up guns and starting shooting people because of Gaston Glock, Samuel Colt, Eliphalet Remington, or any designer, company, or brand of firearms. Inanimate objects don’t kill people, racist ideas and a lawless society that doesn’t lock up criminals leads to mass death.

There were 105 shootings in New York City the month of the black supremacist subway attack. A multitude of different firearms were no doubt used in those attacks. There were also numerous stabbings, including on the subway, without regard to the brand of knife. And over 1,800 assaults in general, along with 1,300 robberies, 255 rapes, and 42 murders.

This is not a gun problem. This is a crime problem. It won’t stop until the criminals and their political enablers are held accountable for unleashing a wave of violence and hate.

DEMOCRAT-CONTROLLED SANCTUARY CITIES IN MELTDOWN

Oakland neighborhood plagued by brazen crimes





San Francisco jeweler closes shop after multiple burglaries






Violence and Drug-Related Gang Killings in Philadelphia

How long before the entire city becomes a "bad neighborhood"?

18 comments

Philadelphia’s South Street used to be the place where all the "hippies met." It was largely a conglomerate of French-themed restaurants, New Age bookstores, art theaters, cafes and boutique leather and craft shops. That has changed over time.

The street’s bohemian accents slowly died out, replaced by a crass commercialism—the news media now calls South Street “an entertainment zone”-- that began to attract wilder groups of people. "Real" Philadelphians learned to avoid the area, leaving it to “Let’s Party Like it’s 1776” T-shirt wearing tourists, and to rough crowds who saw it as the place “to be” on the weekends.

But South Street was not the place to be on Saturday, June 5th at around 11:30 PM. That’s when a trio of young hooligans got into a fight not far from a Rita’s Water ice stand. According to (the liberal publication) Billy Penn, a person sitting at a nearby outdoor restaurant screamed, “They about to shoot!”

Shoot they did. Three people were shot to death -- two men and a woman -- and nearly 14 injured, some of them bleeding in the streets. At this writing, police have yet to identify the victims but they believe that one of the shooters may be among the dead. The city declared the South Street shooting to be the deadliest in 2022 and the largest recorded in the city for nearly a decade.

When I first heard about the shooting, I was sure it was not like those creepy loner, mentally ill mass murders in other parts of the country, but that it fit right in with Philadelphia’s street crime drug culture and drug turf wars and everything that goes along with that.    

Mayor Jim Kenney, who has been conspicuously silent on the issue of gun violence in the city for quite some time, called the South Street incident “beyond devastating” and “yet another horrendous, brazen and despicable act of gun violence” that “has shaken many people in our community.”

D.A. Larry Krasner, the culprit responsible for letting huge numbers of violent criminals out of prison on early parole, tweeted:

The terrible crimes last night on South Street tell our Pennsylvania legislators it’s time for real action. Boycott NRA lobbyists, boycott NRA donations, and bring real common sense gun regulation to Pennsylvania. Now

Krasner’s tweet was met with a counter proposal: “May I also recommend that your office start prosecuting unlicensed firearm possession and felons in possession as serious crimes."

A few days before the June 5th incident, the big talk in Philadelphia was about the violence that happened over the Memorial Day weekend.

Krasner stated that the violence that the city experienced over Memorial Day typified what the city has seen since the start of the pandemic in March 2020 – about one-and-a-half homicides a day.

“So sadly it is about average for that terrible period of time in this gun violence crisis,” Krasner said, while arguing that making arrests for gun possession without a permit “will not dramatically lower gun violence.”

"The notion that the way you're going to solve shootings is arresting people for guns is missing the point,” he went on. “The way you solve shootings is arrest people for shootings. The way you solve homicides by gun is by solving homicides by gun.”

 If our George Soros-knighted D.A. really believes what he is saying, then why is he talking about the National Rifle Association? “The way you solve shootings is arrest people for shootings,” not stopping donations to the NRA, et ceteraet cetera.  

The City of Philadelphia experienced record-breaking gun violence deaths in 2021. During that year alone 562 people were killed and 2,000 injured. The fatalities were not due to assault weapons or to invasions of schools by mentally ill adolescents but by crazed criminals with (mostly) illegal handguns seeking revenge for drug deals gone wrong, drug thefts or drug turf war issues that tend to occur and reoccur in the same Philadelphia neighborhoods.

When the average tourist visits Philadelphia he or she is advised to keep out of certain neighborhoods. Online sites like Trip Advisor will tout the loveliness of Old City, Society Hill and the Rittenhouse Square area, where most of the city’s historic sites are located, while warning against areas like Tioga-Nicetown, North Central, Strawberry Mansion, Harrowgate and Frankford.

South Street was never included in the mix of neighborhoods to stay away from, although mention has been made over the years of the boisterous weekend crowds there who aren’t there for the crystals in the New Age bookstores. Even on a good night, there’s something about these South Street crowds that teeters on the edge of violence.

Then there’s the neighborhood of Kensington, known throughout the world as the largest drug market in the United States. Kensington attracts drug addicts from every part of the country. They come alone or in small groups, camp out in the streets under canvas or cardboard tents, or sleep alone alongside dumpsters or in store entrances along Kensington Avenue.

They come for the cheap fentanyl, which sells for $3-5 a dose. Or they come for the new meth, P2P, which turns users into sociopaths prone to hallucinations and irrational, violent behavior.

Memorial Day weekend in Philadelphia saw 12 fatalities, including a 4-year-old child and a nine-year-old. A 30-year-old man was shot multiple times in West Philadelphia while another fatality occurred in Germantown. Some of these deaths and injuries were the result of crossfire; all of them--with the exception of the 4-year-old’s death (the boy shot himself with his father’s handgun while the latter visited a barbershop)—are drug- and/or gang-related.

Not only are these "gripe killings" becoming more common, they are counting among their victims more innocent bystanders, as the heretofore boundaries between safe and unsafe neighborhoods slowly become blurred. 

Some Philadelphians wonder how long will it be before the entire city falls under the "bad neighborhood" category?

While Krasner has banned so-called "ghost guns" (the weapon of choice for criminals because they lack serial numbers and can be purchased without a background check), his reasoning for not arresting people who have handguns without permits seems to contradict President Biden’s tendency to blame The Gun rather than the criminal who commits an act of violence.

“Once in office, progressives don’t seem to know how to run anything more serious than a street protest,” an opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal declared recently.

This is certainly true in Philadelphia, where blaming criminals doesn’t seem to carry as much weight as blaming The Gun.  

The problem in Philadelphia and elsewhere goes much deeper than guns. Chicago’s lefty mayor, Lori Lightfoot, blames inner-city violence and shootings in her city on “racism.”

“Racism is a public health crisis that continues to rob residents of the opportunity to live and lead full, healthy and happy lives,” Lightfoot has stated, while neglecting the very sensitive (and potentially “racist”) subject of fatherlessness and the dissolution of the family structure that continues to “rob residents of the opportunity to live and lead full, healthy and happy lives.”

In 2020, Philadelphia saw 449 homicides, up 40% from 1990 when there were 500 homicides, according to the Philadelphia Police Department database. Children accounted for 195 of the shooting victims in 2020, with women numbering 229. 2020, of course, was a year plagued with lockdowns and fears related to COVID.

The COVID scare was merely the beginning of a citywide downward spiral that saw the freezing of programs created to help thwart gun violence. It also became an excuse to close courts and release many criminals

Conservative pundit Ann Coulter got it right when she wrote that while America “has more privately owned guns than most other countries, we also make it a lot more difficult than any other country to involuntarily commit crazy people."

“The result of our laissez-faire approach to dangerous psychotics,” she added, “is visible in the swarms of homeless people on our streets, crazy people in our prison populations and the prevalence of mass shootings.”

For the longest time Philadelphia fit Coulter’s first two categories, but after June 5th it can claim all three. 

Thom Nickels is a Philadelphia-based journalist/columnist and the 2005 recipient of the AIA Lewis Mumford Award for Architectural Journalism. He writes for City Journal, New York, Frontpage Magazine and the Philadelphia Irish Edition. He is the author of fifteen books, including ”Literary Philadelphia” and ”From Mother Divine to the Corner Swami: Religious Cults in Philadelphia.” “Death at Dawn: The Murder of Kimberly Ernest” will be published later this year.



SOROS HAS BEEN IMPLICATED WITH LAWYER BARACK OBAMA AND LAWYER HILLARY CLINTON, TWO OF THE MOST CORRUPT POLITICIANS IN AMERICAN HISTORY PRIOR TO GAMER LAWYER JOE BIDEN'S STAGGERING ADMINISTRATION OF CORRUPTION.

His ambition is without borders -- “The Soviet Empire is now the Soros Empire.” “I’m the Pope’s boss now.” And so on, ad nauseum. Yet, like other tyrants, he is untouchable. Those he has made richer and more powerful protect him.

“The Lawlessness of the Obama Administration: A never-ending story.” Michael Barone – American Historian – Washington Examiner

“Obama would declare himself president for life with Soros really running the show, as he did for the entire Obama presidency.”

The pro-migration progressives are eager to lash the U.S. border officers, Law said, even as they also cover up the deaths, rapes, and harms caused to the migrants during their long treks to the side-doors that leftists are opening at the U.S. border:

Report: Soros Prosecutors Run Half of America’s Largest Jurisdictions

Democratic megadonor funneled more than $40 million to elect 75 prosecutors in the last decade

Police investigate a double-homicide in New York City, May 2022. (Getty Images)
 • 

George Soros spent more than $40 million in the past decade to elect scores of liberal prosecutors in half of America's largest jurisdictions, many of which are now roiled by crime.

The Democratic megadonor has backed 75 so-called justice reform prosecutors through direct contributions, PACs, and other third-party entities, the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund revealed in a June report. Though many had little prosecutorial experience when elected, they represent 72 million Americans in some of the nation's most populous municipalities. Ten Soros prosecutors, including Philadelphia district attorney Larry Krasner (D.) and Los Angeles district attorney George Gascon (D.), received $13 million in just the last four years, going on to win races where they had vastly outraised their competition—sometimes by as much as 90 percent. In each race, Soros was the single greatest donor to the campaign.

"Our study shows for the first time, Soros's funding and installation of these district attorneys is fundamentally dismantling the criminal justice system as we know it," Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund president Jason Johnson told the Washington Free Beacon.

The report discloses the power progressive criminal prosecutors wield in the American justice system—and the potential effects of that influence on crime. The FBI in 2020 reported its highest single-year increase in homicides—a 30 percent jump from the previous year. A year later, 12 cities, including Krasner's Philadelphia and Soros-backed district attorney José Garza's Austin, Texas, broke their all-time homicide records. According to the report, more than 40 percent of homicides and a third of all violent and property crimes in 2021 occurred in jurisdictions run by Soros prosecutors.

From cities like Seattle and Los Angeles, to wealthy suburbs near Washington, D.C., to provincial counties in Mississippi and Wisconsin, the prosecutors have radically overhauled bail laws and pursued lightened sentencing in an effort to reduce incarceration. Soros began his quiet effort to remake America's criminal justice system in 2014, donating $50 million to the ACLU for justice reform activism. He followed up in 2016 by funneling more than $3 million into seven local campaigns, including to Cook County district attorney Kim Foxx (D.), the controversial Chicago prosecutor known for dropping charges against Jussie Smollett, who committed a hate crime hoax.

Johnson told the Free Beacon career prosecutors are becoming a thing of the past as former tax attorneys and ACLU lawyers have ascended to top prosecutorial positions on Soros's dime.

Soros's network of justice reform groups includes more than 500 PACs, dark money groups, and nonprofits, the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund report notes. Some, such as the Drug Policy Alliance, where Soros serves as chairman, are open about their affiliation. Others, like the Tides Center, are "donor pass-through organization[s]," which launder donations from Soros's philanthropic juggernauts, including the Open Society Foundations, to subentities and political PACs.

Through a cluster of statewide public safety PACs, Soros donated more than a million dollars each to Krasner, Gascon, Foxx, and Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg (D.). He also donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to Virginia prosecutors Buta Biberaj (D.) and Steve Descano (D.), both of whom have received scrutiny in office for failing to prosecute violent criminals and allowing repeat offenders to victimize others. In a New York Times op-ed last week, Descano also pledged not to prosecute illegal abortions if the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade this month.

Virginia attorney general Jason Miyares (R.) told the Free Beacon the ascent of Soros prosecutors has changed criminal law in many jurisdictions overnight and made communities less safe.

"Instead of trying to change the law through elected officials, these groups are electing prosecutors who simply ignore it," Miyares said. "They've replaced DAs that follow the law with radical extremists with an agenda that makes our communities less safe and emboldens criminals."

The Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund cited Free Beacon report in March that revealed Descano's office had dropped felony charges against a man who attempted to abduct and rape a hotel maid in 2020. One year later, the same man was charged for killing two homeless men and wounding three others during a nine-day shooting spree in New York City and Washington, D.C.

The looming threat to public safety has inspired recall efforts against Descano, Biberaj, and Soros-funded Arlington County commonwealth's attorney Parisa Dehghani-Tafti (D.) in Virginia.

"Soros prosecutors now preside over 20 percent of Americans with the same disastrous results we have seen in Virginia—violent criminals and sexual predators roam the streets victimizing innocents," Sean Kennedy, the president of Virginians for Safe Communities, which fielded a recall effort against the prosecutors, told the Free Beacon. "As San Francisco’s Chesa Boudin faces his fate in a recall today, VSC knows that Northern Virginia’s Soros prosecutors will face the same public reckoning soon as the American people want safety first."

Other prosecutors have participated in junkets, symposiums, and even lavish retreats put on by Soros-funded entities. More than 20 Soros prosecutors, including Gascon, Baltimore state's attorney Marilyn Mosby (D.), and St. Louis circuit attorney Kim Gardner (D.), traveled with Fair and Just Prosecution, a Tides Center subentity, in 2019 to Germany and Portugal, where they learned about "drug decriminalization and harm reduction approaches." The Vera Institute of Justice, a think tank that receives some government grants, treated Mosby and Foxx the same year to an all-expenses-paid spa retreat during work days.

The Vera Institute and other think tanks funded by Soros also promote these progressive prosecutors' tactics while shielding them from bad press. New York University's Brennan Center for Justice has the PR firm BerlinRosen on retainer for district attorneys it works with, according to the report.

The Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund anticipates Soros will spend millions more to reelect Gascon and to install other candidates in Raleigh, N.C., and Alameda County and Orange County, Calif., this year.

Voters in San Francisco issued the first check against Soros prosecutors during a recall election Tuesday, with 60 percent ousting San Francisco district attorney Chesa Boudin (D.) after a little more than two years in office.

In San Francisco, voters give Chesa Boudin, a Soros DA, the boot

In 2019, Chesa Boudin openly campaigned on a hard-left, soft-on-crime platform — and got elected as San Francisco's chief prosecutor.  On Tuesday, San Francisco voters gave him the boot, having discovered that the reality of hard-left governance is much less appealing than the theory and promises.

Boudin comes by his leftism honestly, being descended from a long line of leftist academics and activists.  His parents, Kathy Boudin and David Gilbert, were members of the Weather Underground, a Marxist terrorist group during the 1960s, and were the getaway drivers of the cars used in the 1981 Brink's robbery in New York that left three men dead (a Brinks guard and two police officers).  When Boudin was a toddler, his parents were arrested and convicted, with his mother getting 20 years to life and his father getting 75 years to life.

His parents handed Chesa over to Obama's mentors, Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, both of whom had also been members of the Weather Underground, and they became his surrogate parents.  Boudin attended Yale for both his undergraduate and law degrees.  So, again, he was marinated in leftism.

Once he passed the bar, Boudin worked as a public defender.  He then realized that he could reform the criminal justice system better from the inside than the outside, and in 2019, with $620,000 from various George Soros entities, he ran for the San Francisco district attorney's office.

While Mr. Boudin did not receive money directly from one of Mr. Soros' multiple state PACs, a network of left-wing donors connected to the Hungarian-born billionaire helped Mr. Boudin raise more than $620,000.

Boudin was open about his reforming zeal.  He promised to eliminate cash bail, establish a special unit to re-evaluate wrongful convictions, oppose any requests for assistance from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and work on decarceration (that is, getting criminals out of prison, not into it).  In other words, these are the typical pie-in-in-the sky promises that, if the government is nice to criminals, they will stop committing crimes.  A slim majority of 50.8% of the city's voters got him into office.


Image: Chesa Boudin. YouTube screen grab.

The moment he entered office, Boudin began to make good on his promises.  He started by firing seven senior prosecutors, instantly handicapping his office's ability to prosecute anybody and angering both the fired attorneys and the ones who remained behind.  From there, he embarked on what can only be called a campaign of lawlessness as San Francisco's top lawman.

In his first month, Boudin's office immediately refused to prosecute Jamaica Hampton, a man who attacked a police officer with a liquor bottle, alienating the police.

In his second month, Boudin announced that his office would no longer prosecute contraband claims (i.e., drugs and weapons) if his office determined that a police traffic stop finding that contraband was "pretextual."  He also said he would no longer seek enhanced jail sentences for people with criminal histories because doing so was racist.  Oh, and he eliminated cash bail.

In his third month in office, Boudin used the pretext of COVID to reduce San Francisco's jail population by 25%.  By his fourth month, he increased to 40% the total number of people released from jail.

Beginning in his sixth month in office, which coincided with George Floyd's drug death and the resulting riots, Boudin was all over the anti-policing movement.  He made it almost impossible for people who resisted arrest to be prosecuted and put into place a whole raft of policies that emboldened criminals and disheartened police.  He also consistently released repeat offenders.

Thanks to all these new policies, crime in San Francisco soared.  In addition, homeless encampments and open-air drug use began to smother city streets.  Boudin also turned out to be a poor manager — so much so that, 22 months into the job, a San Francisco Superior Court judge criticized his management for being chaotic and marred by high employee turnover.

Even the leftist San Franciscans who put Chesa Boudin into office couldn't tolerate the crime ravaging the city.  Two recall campaigns were born, with one making it onto the ballot.  The campaign, surprisingly, came from the left.  (Well, it couldn't come from the right because there aren't enough conservatives left in San Francisco to put together a soccer team.)

And yesterday, Tuesday, June 7, Chesa finally had to face the music for the damage he's done to the quality of life in San Francisco: 61% of San Francisco voters said "yes" to the recall measure.

Sadly, it's doubtful that any San Franciscans, having literally been mugged by leftist reality, will change their political views.  Rather than seeing the problem as leftism, they'll almost certainly chalk it up solely to Chesa's mismanagement — and place someone very similar in an office that, before Chesa came along, was held by both Kamala Harris and L.A.'s George Gascon.


How the Left Learned To Stop Worrying and Love Domestic Terrorism 

Biden DOJ asks judge to go easy on Ivy League firebombers

Colinford Mattis and Urooj Rahman / Reuters
 • June 7, 2022 5:00 am

e cusp of nonstop, around-the-clock (primetime!) coverage of the Jan. 6 committee hearings, a couple of domestic terrorists are actually getting their day in court, and it is informative to see how Merrick Garland's Justice Department is handling their prosecution.

Recall Garland's breathless declaration, during his confirmation hearings, that "150 years after the Department's founding, battling extremist attacks on our democratic institutions also remains central to its mission."

Colinford Mattis and Urooj Rahman were arrested in the "mostly peaceful" protests following George Floyd's murder. The two lawyers handed out Molotov cocktails to the crowd, and Rahman tossed one into a police car before fleeing the scene in Mattis's van. They reached a plea deal with federal prosecutors in October 2020 that wiped out six of the seven charges against them. Those prosecutors, nonetheless, sought a maximum 10-year sentence and argued that the incident qualified for a so-called terrorism enhancement that would turbocharge sentencing—a determination with which the U.S. Probation Office concurred.

Ginning herself up to distribute explosives to the crowd, Rahman gave a video interview in which she declared, "This shit won't ever stop until we fuckin' take it all down," adding that "the only way [the police] hear us is through violence."

Then, Garland and the U.S. attorney for New York's Eastern District, Breon Peace, who's handling the prosecution, took office, and you won't believe what happened next!

In mid-May, the same career DOJ prosecutors who argued for that 10-year sentence were back in court withdrawing their plea deal and entering a new one that allowed the defendants to cop to the lesser charge of conspiracy. It tosses out the terrorism enhancement entirely.

The new charge carries a five-year maximum sentence, but the prosecutors are urging the judge to go below that, asking for just 18 to 24 months on account of the "history and personal characteristics of the defendants" and the "aberrational nature of the defendants' conduct." Because, you know, Mattis graduated from Princeton and New York University Law School and was an attorney at the white-shoe law firm Pryor Cashman, and Rahman was a public-interest lawyer whose "best friend," Obama administration intelligence official Salmah Rizvi, guaranteed the $250,000 required to release her on bail.

Law360, which reported on the events, calls the new deal an "unusual step." James Trusty, a former prosecutor in the Department of Justice's criminal division, broke it down for us this way: "Swapping in a softer plea agreement after having gone through the plea hearing is an exceedingly rare event in federal court." It can happen, he said, if there is "truly some new development or understanding about the defendants that merits a fresh look."

In this case, the new development is the political persuasion of the folks running the Justice Department, and for them, Mattis and Rahman are the right kind of domestic terrorists—the ones whose cases and conduct will never be the subject of a congressional hearing or plastered from wall to wall on cable television.

Remember their names, and the special treatment they received at the hands of the Biden Justice Department, when the broadcasts begin on Thursday and when Garland next has the gall to feign concern about political violence directed at our democratic institutions.

Mattis and Rahman Change of Plea Hearing by Washington Free Beacon on Scribd


No comments: