America Faces No Greater Threat Than Joe Biden and the Democrat Party. Their Assault to Our Borders Is As Great As Their Assault to Free Speech and Free Elections
Friday, July 15, 2022
HOW MUCH DAMAGE HAS BEEN PERPETRATED ON AMERICA BY DEMOCRAT LAWYER-POLITICIANS? - But they also empowered the corrupt Clinton dynasty, which still plagues American politics 30 years later.
President Biden blamed congressional Republicans for record-high inflation while addressing the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) in a recent speech in Philadelphia. Biden pathetically argued that his economic agenda, which relies on massive government spending, would help tame inflation. He also lamely — and falsely — blamed Republican obstruction of that agenda for the country's current economic woes. (It seems Biden is an alumnus of the Hillary Clinton Institute for Excellence in Blame-Shifting and Denouncement.)
DICK MORRIS:
On America’s First Family of Crime….. NO! Not the Bushes again!
Clinton global hucksterism – Selling out America like they sold out the Lincoln Bedroom.
The left cared nothing about that bit of collusion.
Hillary and her campaign aides have long been involved with Russia for reasons of personal gain. Clinton herself got $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation for allowing Russia to take over twenty percent of all uranium production in the U.S. Her campaign chairman, John Podesta, is reaping the financial benefits of being on the board of a Russian company, Joule, which he did not disclose. PATRICIA McCARTHY
Had Hillary been elected, the Clinton Foundation would be raking in even more millions than it did before. She would be happily selling access, favors and our remaining freedoms out from under us. PATRICIA McCARTHY
RUNNING THE COUNTRY INTO THE GROUND: Here they are!
HOW MANY OF THESE PIGS ARE GAMER LAWYERS?
“Protect and enrich.” This is a perfect encapsulation of the Clinton (LAWYERS-2) Foundation and the (LAWYERS-2) Obama book and television deals. Then there is the Biden (LAWYERS-3) family corruption, followed closely behind by similar abuses of power and office by the (LAWYER) Warren and Sanders families, as Peter Schweizer described in his recent book “Profiles in Corruption.” These names just scratch the surface of government corruption(YOU CAN ADD LAWYER KAMALA HARRIS AND LAWYER CHUCK SCHUMER TO THE PATHEION OF DEMOCRAT BRIBES SUCKING CORRUPT LAWYER POLITICIANS!). BRIAN C JOONDEPH
Qatar's longstanding efforts to buy influence in the United States have, quite unsurprisingly, included substantial donations to the Clinton Foundation. In 2011, for example, the foundation accepted a $1 million gift from Qatar in honor of former president Bill Clinton's 65th birthday. Hillary was serving as secretary of state at the time, but failed to disclose the massive donation to the State Department despite her pledge to keep the agency apprised of the foundation's foreign donors. (CORRECTION: THE CLINTONS WORKED OUT A DEAL WITH THE OTHER GAMER LAWYER, BARACK OBAMA, SO THAT THEY WOULD NOT HAVE TO REVEAL THE BRIBES THEY GOT FROM MUSLIM DICTATORS - OBAMA HAS LONG BEEN ON THE TAKE FROM THE SAUDI DICTATORS WHOM HE HAS LONG SERVED WELL).... IT'S NOW BEEN REVEALED THAT THE BIDEN CRIME FAMILY OF PARASITIC LAWYERS HAS BEEN INFLUENCE PEDDLING IN THE MIDDLE EAST VIA GAMER PARASITE LAWYER JAMES BIDEN - More here:
THE BIDEN CRIME FAMILY OF PARASITE LAWYERS IN THE MIDDLE EAST
I’ve been writing a lot about how the Dems have painted themselves into a corner. It is beyond fun to contemplate how badly they’ve cooked their own gooses for the next two election cycles. It’s also a reason for us conservatives to have some optimism. We’ve been yearning for an American reset for some time and the Dems have been working unwittingly to provide it (is there any kind of Dem but a witless one?). Maybe conservatives actually have an opportunity to make it happen – if we don’t pass on this rare chance. Which brings me to some interesting email I’ve been receiving.
I’ve gotten a fair amount of negative email from readers. They aren’t bothered by my assessment of how badly the Dems have screwed everything up. They’re bothered by my level of optimism. A composite of these emails would read something like this:
The Democrats are evil geniuses. They have corrupted everything and there will never be another fair election. Even if we do get Republicans elected, they’re all a bunch of Vichy cowards and will do nothing to stop our march towards socialism. America is finished.
For everyone that feels that way, I have a couple of questions. What’s your plan, Sparky? Do you care enough to do something besides whine about it? The pessimists in the conservative camp need to make a choice, and I only see four options.
Option 1 would be to cast a protest vote. I get it – a choice between a RINO and a Democrat feels like no choice at all. I don’t think it will happen, but my worst nightmare is going into the voting booth in 2024 and seeing a choice between Romney and Obama (Michelle this time). Thanks, Utah.
Unfortunately, some conservatives will go the protest route. They will vote for a third-party candidate that has no chance of actually winning. The Democrats would love for a large number of conservatives to take that option – which should convince those same conservatives that it would be a huge mistake.
In 1992, faced with a choice between Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush, 19,743,821 principled protesters voted for Ross Perot, and delivered the presidency to Bill Clinton. They certainly made their dissatisfaction with the choices known. But they also empowered the corrupt Clinton dynasty, which still plagues American politics 30 years later. SomeDemocrats are even talking about another Hillary run in 2024. Others want Chelsea to get into politics. It gives me night terrors just thinking about it. So, how did that protest vote from 30 years ago work out for America? Wasn’t so harmless, was it?
The “we’re doomed” crowd could take non-electoral action – and no, I don’t mean revolution. Option 2 would be to amend the Constitution to redirect America’s course. Article V of the Constitution provides the states with a means to do it without the help of our RINOs in Washington, DC. It’s a powerful tool that was endorsed by the late Justice Scalia. One group, Convention of States Action, is pursuing this option and they’re more than half way to making it happen. However, it would be naïve to think that an amendment, without good leadership, could fix what ails the country. Just think about the damage a few Supreme Court appointments from President Ocasio-Cortez could do.
My impression is that the default plan of the doomsayers is option 3 – surrender. Stop voting or supporting the Republicans and just give up. One of my business mentors, a retired Army Colonel, told me that in any conflict, the winner is selected by the loser. When one party stops fighting, they award the win to the other party. Those that think America isn’t worth the effort anymore, can go back to their Big Bang Theory reruns and wait to get the daily government talking points on the 10:00 nightly Tass broadcast. But when they’re saddened at the sight of their children growing up in an America without freedom, they’ll have nobody to blame but themselves. They will never know if their votes could have made the difference.
Option 4 is to soldier on. Show up at the polls every election day (including primary elections) and vote smartly. As for the argument that we’ll never have another fair election – we don’t need fair elections, we need conservatives elected. There will always be cheating, but if our margin of victory is big enough the cheating will not be able to steal the election.
I recommend that we follow the guidance of William F. Buckley Jr. – vote for the most conservative candidate that can win. That means that we have to accept that some candidates from the west coast or the northeast will need to be somewhat more moderate than candidates from Texas or Idaho. But, the Democrats have bolixed things up so badly, that I suspect some very conservative candidates can, and will, win in the next two elections.
Those of us choosing option 4 need to get out to the primaries and vote for the most conservative candidates available. Then we need to show up for the general election and do it all over again.
As you have probably guessed, I’ve chosen option 4 for myself. The next two election cycles are going to be HUUGE for conservatives. There is no way I’m going to miss out on being a part of that.
And as long as we’ve decided to soldier on, let’s do it with enthusiasm and optimism. The more confidence we project, the more likely it will be that the leftists will become dispirited and take their own option 3. Given the news lately, they’re getting pretty dispirited already – thanks to President Gremlin. As an added bonus, if we’re joyous while beating them, it will drive them absolutely bonkers. We all need to stop whining, put on a happy face, and engage!
The Republican National Committee on Wednesday released a video exclusively to Breitbart News detailing President Joe Biden’s involvement in Hunter Biden’s family business scheme.
While Joe Biden has claimed at least seven times to have no knowledge of his family’s corrupt dealings, the president has evidently played a role in the Biden family business at least 12 times over six years.
Text messages from 2019 on Hunter’s “laptop from hell” reveal the Biden family’s payout mechanism, which indicates a collection of 50 percent of familial salaries for 30 years. The mechanism could be legal “predicates” for racketeering charges, according to former Utah U.S. attorney Brett Tolman.
“I hope you all can do what I did and pay for everything for this entire family for 30 years,” Hunter texted to his daughter describing the family’s payment system. “It’s really hard. But don’t worry, unlike Pop [Joe], I won’t make you give me half your salary.”
Hunter Biden is currently under investigation by Joe Biden’s Justice Department for tax fraud, money laundering, and violation of lobbying laws, according to the New York Times. Hunter is reportedly trying to settle the case out of court and has paid $1 million to the IRS to evade conviction or a long sentence.
According to an April Harris poll, 58 percent of Americans believe Joe Biden has played a role in his family’s business. Sixty percent say Hunter Biden, a key member of the family enterprise, has sold “influence and access” to Joe Biden. The poll also found that 67 percent believe Joe Biden should be impeached if he “secretly participated and facilitated” in the family’s business.
The RNC’s video script depicting Biden’s involvement with the family business follows:
His son, Hunter, joining the then-vice president on the official visit to Beijing. Unknown to the press back then, Hunter Biden was forming a Chinese private equity fund, planning to raise money, including from Chinese investors. Ten days after the Bidens’ trip, Shanghai authorities issued the fund’s business license.
Then-Vice President Joe Biden had dinner with his son, Hunter, along with Hunter’s business associates from Ukraine, Russia, and Kazakhstan. And the day after the dinner, a Burisma executive sent a note to Hunter, quoting, “Dear Hunter, thank you for inviting me to D.C. and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spend some time together.”
Hunter’s lucrative business dealings often included giving as much as 50% of his earnings to his dad. The texts read, quote, “I hope you all can do what I did and pay for everything for this entire family for 30 years. It’s really hard, but don’t worry. Unlike Pop, I won’t make you give me half your salary.”
“And Hunter introduced me as, ‘This is Tony, Dad, the individual I told you about that’s helping us with the business that we’re working on and the Chinese.'”
The email reads this way, quote, “At the moment, there’s a provisional agreement that the equity will be distributed as follows: ten held by Hunter for the big guy.”
“I a thousand percent sit here and know that the big guy is referencing Joe Biden. I met with the former vice president in person multiple times.”
A newly revealed text message shows Bobulinski was apparently warned by business partner James Gilliar, “Don’t mention Joe being involved. It’s only when you are face to face. I know you know that, but they are paranoid.”
Chinese executives admitted to reporters that they were actually introduced to the vice president by Hunter Biden.
Hunter and the then-vice president seen with a pair of Mexican billionaires. At the same time, Hunter had been working on energy deals in Mexico.
Joe Biden also had Hunter and his business partner fly on Air Force Two to Mexico.
The president agreed to pay Hunter Biden’s legal fees for his business dealings with a Chinese controlled company. Hunter’s assistant reportedly telling a pair of Biden aides, quote, “I spoke with Hunter today regarding his bills. It is my understanding that Hunter dad will cover these bills in the short term.”
There is photographic evidence of Biden on a golf outing with both his son, Hunter, and a man called Devon Archer, who was another member of the Burisma board.
We also know that Devon Archer in that picture had a meeting in the White House, a one-on-one meeting with Joe Biden about a week before they joined the Burisma board.
His closest business partner, Hunter’s, has made at least 19 visits to the White House and other official locations, including a sit down with then-Vice President Joe Biden in the West Wing.
“I have never discussed with my son or my brother or anyone else anything having to do with their businesses. Period.”
RNC Research commented on Biden’s corrupt business dealings on Twitter:
Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton attended Yale Law School. But they must have skipped class for the lesson in honesty related in Sir Walter Scott's epic poem, "Marmion: A Tale of Flodden Field": "Oh what a tangled web we weave /When first we practice to deceive."
Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton have struggled with the truth for their entire lives. Remember Hillary's imaginary landing in Bosnia under sniper fire. Or her invented right-wing conspiracy against Bill to smuggle his DNA onto Monica Lewinsky's blue dress. Or her hallucinogenic proclamation that turning Libya into a terrorist-filled wilderness constituted "smart power at its best."
A leopard cannot change its spots. So, it is unsurprising to encounter a new Hillary Clinton fib of which I have personal knowledge. It may seem minor, but it speaks volumes about her unfitness for leadership.
At an early age, I was privileged to serve as a confidential assistant to Clarence Thomas, the chairman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Thomas was later elevated by President George H.W. Bush to the United States Supreme Court after a short stint on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The Supreme Court is the most prestigious and powerful court in the world.
As his confidential assistant, I was privy daily to many details of his private life. We forged a bond that has endured to the present day and will continue until the expiration of our natural lives. I am hesitant to discuss private matters, but an exception in this case is justified to keep the record straight and to defend Justice Thomas.
Hillary Clinton recently appeared on "CBS Mornings." To fortify the credibility of her polemic, she alleged personal encounters with Thomas during their attendance at Yale Law. As any attendee of a prestigious law school knows, the students are characteristically hermetically sealed from one another by assignments to distinct sections based on year of admission or expected graduation. It is not unusual for two students attending the same law school during the same or overlapping years to never have spoken to each other. Students typically form small study groups and seldom venture sustained interactions with outsiders.
On CBS, Hillary Clinton claimed to have discerned the inner workings of Thomas' mind during their joint attendance at Yale Law, although she was not in his graduating class. She declared that she "knew" Thomas and perceived him as a "person of grievance."
Think of that coming from Hillary Clinton. "A person of grievance"? Is she projecting her own vengeful personality? According to the book "HRC" by Jonathan Allen and Arnie Parnes, Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton compiled an "enemies" list of people who declined to support Hillary in the 2008 presidential primaries. The book declares the two created "a special circle of Clinton hell ... for people who had endorsed (Barack) Obama."
In any event, Thomas was one of only 10 black students in his Yale Law class. He grew up on a farm during the depths of Jim Crow. Is it easy to forget childhood humiliations and denigrations? Did Frederick Douglass forget his enslavement?
But let's return to Hillary Clinton's allegation that she knew Thomas at Yale Law. It is false. He did not know her. She was a classmate with who he seldom, if ever, interacted. My conversations with the justice lead me to conclude the two never spoke with each other. Her "person of grievance" speculation must be based on unreliable hearsay or eavesdropping.
Hillary Clinton is a worn-out politician who craves relevance. She has nothing of substance to say, so she traffics in gossip and a politics of revenge.
Her lie about her Yale connection with Thomas was strategically timed to coincide with Supreme Court decisions she opposed. Instead of addressing the merits of the decisions, she resorted to ad hominem attacks to excite her crowd of deplorables blaming every evil in the world on gender discrimination -- especially her 2016 presidential election defeat by Donald Trump. Who is the true person of grievance? Hillary Clinton or Clarence Thomas? You decide.
Hillary Clinton will ultimately pass from the scene. But her daughter, Chelsea, seems prepared to pick up her grievance torch with fresh energy. All of this goes to verify the wisdom of Henry Adams: "Politics, as a practice, whatever its professions, has always been the systematic organization of hatreds."
Have you ever wondered why nothing dries faster than a politician's tears?
Hillary Clinton joins the pile-on against Clarence Thomas, getting her 'congenital liar' on
Six Supreme Court justices voted to overturn Roe v. Wade as a faulty legal ruling. But the left being the left, they are going after the black guy.
Which explains the near insanity of the left's reaction against distinguished Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who is black and ruled with the majority. That's an unforgiveable thing to leftists who continue to view black people as their "property."
There's been some grotesque stuff going on, leftists zeroing in on Thomas with a special rage in a special pile-on unseen anywhere else. That's led to strange specters such as white Karen-types openly employing the use of the "n word" against him, and other barbarians openly calling for the assassination of the justice, with no sanctions whatsoever while "Uncle Clarence" trended on the Twitter platform.
It's a leftist thing. So in comes Hillary Clinton, to add to the pile-on:
Which can't be anything but a full-blown buck-naked lie of the kind she's famous for, the kind that got the late Bill Safire to sum her up as a "congenital liar" several decades ago.
Resentment? Grievance? Anger? Nobody's ever heard those terms used to describe Thomas, who has had to put up with indignity after indignity from the rabid left, including sleazy Sen. Joe Biden himself during Thomas's confirmation hearing.
Here's what normal people who know Thomas say:
There are many stories of his kindnesses to low guys on the totem pole, and speaking of that, even Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the dumbest person on the court, has spoken of his kindness.
Bitterness and resentment are a Hillary thing. The wretched failed presidential candidate is projecting.
Philip Klein at the Washington Examiner notes in a tweet that the rest of Hillary Clinton's claims are problematic, too:
The two of them likely didn't even know each other.
Even if they did, why would Hillary not have brought this smear up earlier, say, during his confirmation hearings? It just goes to show the claim is virtually certainly a lie.
Claiming Thomas is resentful is pretty much the same as calling him "an angry black man," which should enrage the left
Why aren't they enraged? Well, because they are the perpretators of the lie. Hillary Clinton is just glomming on in a pathetic bid to join the most racist leftist bandwagon within memory. It's pathetic.
HILLARY'S LIFE OF LAWYER CRIMES GOES WAY, WAY, WAY BACK. SHE'S NOT IN PRISON BECAUSE LAWYERS ARE PROTECTED CRIMINAL CLASS!
Hillary Clinton joins the pile-on against Clarence Thomas, getting her 'congenital liar' on
Six Supreme Court justices voted to overturn Roe v. Wade as a faulty legal ruling. But the left being the left, they are going after the black guy.
Which explains the near insanity of the left's reaction against distinguished Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who is black and ruled with the majority. That's an unforgiveable thing to leftists who continue to view black people as their "property."
There's been some grotesque stuff going on, leftists zeroing in on Thomas with a special rage in a special pile-on unseen anywhere else. That's led to strange specters such as white Karen-types openly employing the use of the "n word" against him, and other barbarians openly calling for the assassination of the justice, with no sanctions whatsoever while "Uncle Clarence" trended on the Twitter platform.
It's a leftist thing. So in comes Hillary Clinton, to add to the pile-on:
Which can't be anything but a full-blown buck-naked lie of the kind she's famous for, the kind that got the late Bill Safire to sum her up as a "congenital liar" several decades ago.
Resentment? Grievance? Anger? Nobody's ever heard those terms used to describe Thomas, who has had to put up with indignity after indignity from the rabid left, including sleazy Sen. Joe Biden himself during Thomas's confirmation hearing.
Here's what normal people who know Thomas say:
There are many stories of his kindnesses to low guys on the totem pole, and speaking of that, even Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the dumbest person on the court, has spoken of his kindness.
Bitterness and resentment are a Hillary thing. The wretched failed presidential candidate is projecting.
Philip Klein at the Washington Examiner notes in a tweet that the rest of Hillary Clinton's claims are problematic, too:
The two of them likely didn't even know each other.
Even if they did, why would Hillary not have brought this smear up earlier, say, during his confirmation hearings? It just goes to show the claim is virtually certainly a lie.
Claiming Thomas is resentful is pretty much the same as calling him "an angry black man," which should enrage the left
Why aren't they enraged? Well, because they are the perpretators of the lie. Hillary Clinton is just glomming on in a pathetic bid to join the most racist leftist bandwagon within memory. It's pathetic.
HOW MANY OF THESE PIGS ARE GAMER LAWYERS?
“Protect and enrich.” This is a perfect encapsulation of the Clinton (LAWYERS-2) Foundation and the (LAWYERS-2) Obama book and television deals. Then there is the Biden (LAWYERS-3) family corruption, followed closely behind by similar abuses of power and office by the (LAWYER) Warren and Sanders families, as Peter Schweizer described in his recent book “Profiles in Corruption.” These names just scratch the surface of government corruption (YOU CAN ADD LAWYER KAMALA HARRIS AND LAWYER CHUCK SCHUMER TO THE PATHEION OF DEMOCRAT BRIBES SUCKING CORRUPT LAWYER POLITICIANS!). BRIAN C JOONDEPH
Qatar's longstanding efforts to buy influence in the United States have, quite unsurprisingly, included substantial donations to the Clinton Foundation. In 2011, for example, the foundation accepted a $1 million gift from Qatar in honor of former president Bill Clinton's 65th birthday. Hillary was serving as secretary of state at the time, but failed to disclose the massive donation to the State Department despite her pledge to keep the agency apprised of the foundation's foreign donors.
Turns Out a Foreign Agent Really Did Infiltrate a 2016 Presidential Campaign
Retired general allegedly lobbied for terrorism sponsor
How do you say "kompromat" in Arabic? Asking for Hillary Clinton.
John R. Allen, the Brookings Institute director under FBI investigation for secretly lobbying on behalf of the Qatari government, was a prominent backer of Hillary's failed presidential campaign. The retired four-star general delivered a "rousing endorsement" of Clinton during his widely celebrated address at the Democratic National Convention in 2016.
Allen received a hero's welcome on the final night of the convention when Clinton formally accepted the party's nomination. After being introduced by Rep. Ted Lieu (D., Calif.) as the "general who knows more about ISIS than anyone," Allen marched on stage to the sound of a military drum cadence as if he was Gen. George S. Patton celebrating the Allied victory in Europe.
"My fellow Americans, I tell you without any hesitation or reservation that Hillary Clinton will be exactly the kind of commander in chief America needs today," Allen said as a boisterous contingent of convention-goers chanted "No more war!" Following his speech, Allen told NPR he considered it his "duty" to support Hillary—a line reminiscent of failed candidate John Kerry's infamous proclamation at the 2004 Democratic convention.
Brookings placed Allen on administrative leave Wednesday amid revelations that investigators have obtained "substantial evidence" that Allen knowingly violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act by failing to disclose his work for the government of Qatar, a notorious sponsor of terrorism and anti-Semitic propaganda. The influential think tank has been criticized for its close ties to the controversial regime, which has donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to Brookings over the years and in 2014 pledged nearly $15 million to build a satellite campus in Doha. Allen was named president of Brookings in October 2017.
Qatar's longstanding efforts to buy influence in the United States have, quite unsurprisingly, included substantial donations to the Clinton Foundation. In 2011, for example, the foundation accepted a $1 million gift from Qatar in honor of former president Bill Clinton's 65th birthday. Hillary was serving as secretary of state at the time, but failed to disclose the massive donation to the State Department despite her pledge to keep the agency apprised of the foundation's foreign donors.
Investigators say Allen was secretly lobbying on behalf of Qatar alongside Imaad Zuberi, a Pakistani-American businessman who donated $250,000 to the Clinton Foundation. In February 2021, Zuberi was sentenced to 12 years in prison for falsifying records related to his foreign lobbying. They were joined by Richard Olson, who served as U.S. ambassador to Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates under former president Barack Obama and recently pleaded guilty to illegally lobbying on behalf of Qatar.
Hillary Clinton and her allies continue to insist that Donald Trump's presidential campaign was infiltrated by foreign agents. They have also repeatedly peddled the false notion that Clinton was the legitimate winner of the 2016 election because Russian operatives with ties to Trump hacked voting machines to manipulate the outcome.
Qatari efforts to exert influence over Democratic politicians have shown no sign of slowing in recent years. Rep. Eric Swalwell (D., Calif.), the failed presidential candidate best known for farting on live television, was photographed while enjoying a shirtless camel ride in Qatar during a 2021 trip financed by the U.S.-Qatar Business Council.
Clinton pulled the 'dirtiest, dirtiest' tricks in American politics: Goodwin
Victorious Democrats would also end congressional investigations into the Hillary-Deep State-DNC-Russian-Clinton Foundation collusion and corruption. All the players in these massive, sordid affairs will be deemed “too big to jail” – and too closely tied to the Democratic Party to be investigated further.
George Soros Donates $125 Million to Democrats Before November Midterms
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S OPEN BORDERS FOR CHEAP LABOR
Those are the subliterate, low-skill, non-English-speaking indigents whose own societies are unable or unwilling to usefully educate and employ them. Bring these people here and they not only need a lot of services, they are putty in the hands of leftist demogogues as Hugo Chavez demonstrated - and they are very useful as leftist voters who will support the Soros agenda.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WywjHtIzNVU
No comments:
Post a Comment