Why is Biden protecting illegal alien drunk drivers?
The Biden administration has done a lot of damage to immigration enforcement in the U.S., but perhaps its most dangerous move has been its consistent refusal to deport criminal illegal aliens who commit crimes right here in the U.S.
The latest example of the Biden administration’s malfeasance came late last month when the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) canceled a deportation request for an illegal alien who allegedly killed a teenager in a hit-and-run incident. Heriberto Fuerte-Padilla, an illegal alien from Mexico, was arrested in November 2020 after he allegedly drunkenly rammed his car into the car of 19-year-old Texas woman Adrienne Sophia Exum, killing her. Fuerte-Padilla then allegedly fled the scene before police officers caught up and apprehended him. After initially putting out a detainer for Fuerte-Padilla’s deportation, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) rescinded the detainer after Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas dramatically reduced the pool of illegal aliens eligible for deportations.
“To be arrested or deported, a migrant now must be a national security risk, a recent border jumper or a public safety risk,” a report from the Washington Times stated.
While most law-abiding Americans would likely consider drunk driving a “public safety risk,” Mayorkas has made clear that he sees things differently. Shortly after taking office last year, Mayorkas announced that many criminal illegal aliens living in the country no longer had to worry about being deported. The guidelines adopted by DHS under Mayorkas’ leadership give free passes to illegal aliens who commit crimes such as drunk driving and assault. Other illegal aliens living in Texas with drunk driving offenses are also getting a pass, according to the Washington Times’s report.
Another illegal alien who is benefiting from the Biden administration’s relaxed rules is Jose Godoy Vasquez, an illegal alien from Guatemala who now lives in Texas. Vasquez has a lengthy criminal record, which includes convictions for drunk driving, drug possession, and domestic violence. Like Fuerte-Padilla, Vasquez initially had an ICE detainer on him, which was rescinded as a result of the policies implemented by Mayorkas after he took office. This means Vasquez will be able to continue to live in Texas once he’s released from prison in 2025, unless a new administration is elected and rescinds the White House’s current policies. The Washington Times’s report also noted Nay Thar, an illegal alien from Thailand who was previously convicted of drug possession and drunk driving. Thar was released from prison earlier this year, and will be allowed to continue to live in Texas because of the Biden administration’s guidelines.
Biden is doubling down on his radical anti-borders agenda even as polls make clear that the American people oppose these policies. Even some Americans who cast their ballots for Biden in the last presidential election now regret their votes, including Adrienne Sophia Exum’s mother, who recently expressed outrage over the administration’s refusal to deport her daughter’s alleged killer.
"By him not being deported, it’s like you telling me my daughter’s life didn’t mean anything,” she said in a recent Fox News interview.
It may sound harsh, but it’s certainly a reasonable conclusion to come to given the Biden administration’s stubborn refusal to hold criminal illegal aliens accountable. At the very least, it’s fair to say there is a startling lack of empathy from America’s leaders towards victims of illegal alien crime. We see this lack of empathy demonstrated not just in this administration’s refusal to deport illegal aliens convicted of drunk driving offenses, but in instances involving other crimes as well.
A recent investigation from the Immigration Reform Law Institute uncovered the story of Antonio Miranda-Cota, an illegal alien in Nevada who is currently serving a five year prison sentence for repeatedly bludgeoning his construction co-worker in the head with a claw-hammer, an act that nearly killed his victim. Miranda-Cota had previously been referred for deportation after two previous assaults, but was allowed to stay in the country, and was ultimately given a work visa by the Obama administration. Miranda-Cota’s victim survived the attack, but has lost his ability to work, and was not allowed to read a victim impact statement at Miranda-Cota’s sentencing.
These crimes evoke such outrage because of how preventable they are. The refusal of our political elites to enforce the law has led to a body count that continues to grow. The Biden administration’s radical moves to protect criminal illegal aliens will only create more victims and more suffering.
William J. Davis is a communications associate for the Immigration Reform Law Institute, a public interest law firm working to defend the rights and interests of the American people from the negative effects of mass migration.
Image: Pixnio / public domain
MORE VIVA LA RAZA SUPREMACY?
The confirmation process of Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court is an opportunity for the GOP
By Rajan Laad
Last month, Joe Biden pledged to nominate "the first Black woman ever to the United States Supreme Court."
This followed Justice Stephen Breyer’s announcement that he was retiring at the end of the current term, 28 years after being appointed by President Clinton.
This could be construed as an insult to the candidate because the implication is that she wasn’t necessarily the best choice, merely the best among a double-restricted group (Blacks, women) that amounts to a little over 9 percent of the entire population male and female population of all races, and half that number subtracting the under-18s component. In other words, 4.5%.
Ideally, any self-respecting candidate should have rejected the offer because of the inherent condescension of the criteria.
However, last week Joe Biden nominated Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson of the federal appeals court to replace Justice Breyer.
The Biden administration probably sees this as a win-win situation.
They think a confirmation may be an antidote to Biden’s rapidly declining popularity among blacks. If the nominee is rejected, for example, the Republicans can be branded as racist, which can rile up their base for the mid-terms. They can push the narrative of white supremacist Republicans preventing the first black woman from becoming a Supreme Court Justice. In their minds this would help them during the mid-terms, perhaps with their black voters.
With the Senate divided 50-50 between the parties, Democrats have just the votes to confirm Jackson, if they back her unanimously. Vice President Harris still has the deciding vote should there be a tie.
But the Republicans now have two very valid reasons to oppose Judge Jackson’s confirmation.
The first is that the selection criteria made the nomination was unconstitutional and the second is Jackson’s mixed record.
We plunge deeper.
The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws
The 19th Amendment to the Constitution states:
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
In 1978, in the Regents of University of California v. Bakke case, the Supreme Court ruled that the use of racial "quotas" for its selection process is unconstitutional.
Biden’s public declaration to restrict his nomination to a specific demographic group only, i.e. women of color, violates above the tenets of the Constitution, and it is also an act of discrimination against all those who are not women of color, hence it is immoral.
They can assert that a constitutional appointment cannot occur by violating the Constitution.
One could argue that this alone should be enough to disqualify Jackson.
Now for Jackson’s record.
Breitbart reported Jackson has a mixed record on immigration — twice striking down President Donald Trump’s border controls but also upholding that federal agencies have broad authority to build a wall along the United States-Mexico border and ruling in favor of regulations to tighten up asylum rules.
Vox reported that Jackson supported a left-wing judicial activist organization Demand Justice and issued several narrow rulings against the Trump administration, including its immigration policies.
Jackson also ruled in 2019 that former Trump White House counsel Don McGahn had to testify as part of the House’s inquiry into Russian election interference, declaring in her ruling that: “Presidents are not kings.”
Jackson may be part of the woke cults while handling immigration-related cases. Jackson in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, used the term “noncitizen” or “undocumented non-citizens” rather than the terms “alien” or “illegal aliens” that are regularly used in court and in federal statutes.
Jackson served as vice chairperson of the United States Sentencing Commission, where she was involved in reducing sentences for drug offenders.
The commission retroactively reduced sentences for crack cocaine offenses back in 2011 causing reduced sentences for 12,000 incarcerated individuals and making an estimated 1,800 inmates eligible for immediate release. The commission also cut sentences for most federal drug offenders during her last year as a commissioner.
Should Jackson be first questioned about her acceptance of the nomination as a diversity hire and asked to condemn Biden's act of discrimination? The risk is she may flip it over and use it to lecture the questioner about the history of racism and make it defining moment.
Based on her past record, the GOP must, while asking questions, cite the perils of illegal immigrationm particularly to Black Americans on the lowest rungs of the job ladder, and the crimes that are committed by unvetted illegal border crossers. She must be asked about Biden secretly transporting illegals to various parts of the country in the dead of night. It would be a real triumph to find victims who suffered due to crimes of illegal immigrants. Many, of course, are Black.
Also, based on her record, the GOP must cite the opioid epidemic and expound in detail the catastrophic consequences that drug intake has had on families and especially the very young. She must then be asked about her work on the Sentencing Commission that led to the sentence reduction and release of drug offenders. Perhap they should find victims who suffered due to this release program and interview them or present a video of them during the hearings.
The real opportunity for the GOP is grilling Jackson on her position on key issues such as guns, immigration, drug offenses, vaccine mandates, lockdowns, abortion, BLM, censorship, Big Tech and many more burning issues.
We all remember the sub-human disgraceful display of the Democrats during the confirmation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh. But the Republicans will never stoop to those levels, and some see that as their weakness, i.e., their lacking of the killer instinct to give it as much as they get. Others see this morality as the only thing that distinguishes them from the Democrats.
Jackson, if confirmed will not alter the Supreme Court’s general trajectory. Her political and ideological proclivities seem identical to those of outgoing Justice Stephen Breyer.
Unless something out of the ordinary occurs, Jackson’s confirmation seems certain. Even if Sens. Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin or any other Democrat do not vote for her, Republican Senators such as Mitt Romney along with Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, and Lindsey Graham, who previously broke Republican ranks to vote for Jackson’s confirmation to the D.C. Circuit, are most likely to vote for her.
If nothing else, the GOP should see this as a great campaign opportunity for the midterms. They will have the national stage to demonstrate their commitment to issues such as border security, immigration control, freedom of expression, protecting the vulnerable from drug abuse, freedom of choice and expression, anti-wokeness, anti-vax mandates, and so much more.
Let's hope the opportunity is seized.
Addendum: Here's a fun fact: Ketan happens to be a male Indian name, and the word 'ji' is added as a matter of respect. Hence Ketanji is what a shop owner who hails from the same state as India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi may be affectionately called.
Joe Biden SCOTUS Nominee Refuses to Use ‘Illegal Alien,’ Opts for ‘Noncitizen’
Drew Angerer/Getty Images
28 Feb 20220
2:22
President Joe Biden’s nominee to replace Justice Stephen Breyer on the Supreme Court, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, apparently refuses to use the term “illegal alien” in her court opinions, opting instead for “noncitizen.”
In a handful of immigration-related cases that Jackson has ruled on U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, she has made a note to employ the term “noncitizen” or “undocumented non-citizens” rather than the terms “alien” or “illegal aliens” that are regularly used in court and in federal statutes.
For instance, in Make the Road New York v. McAleenan, Jackson wrote a footnote in her ruling stating:
The Court uses the term “undocumented non-citizens” throughout this Memorandum Opinion to refer to persons born abroad—the federal immigration statutes call them “aliens”—who are deemed “inadmissible” under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1182(a)(6)(C) or 1182(a)(7) because they have not received authorization to come into, or remain, in the United States. [Emphasis added]
Likewise, in Kiakombua v. Wolf, Jackson notes that “this Memorandum Opinion employs the term ‘noncitizen’ in lieu of the term ‘alien’ to refer to ‘any person who is not a citizen or national of the United States.'”
Ketanji Brown Jackson, nominated to be a U.S. Circuit Judge for the District of Columbia Circuit, is sworn in before a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on pending judicial nominations, Wednesday, April 28, 2021, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (Kevin Lamarque/Pool via AP)
Dan Stein, head of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), said in a statement that Jackson’s “refusal at times to use the term ‘alien’ in the context of interpreting immigration law — a term of longstanding and legally correct usage — indicates a willingness to allow politics and political pressure to influence her judgment.”
“This is of concern to us, as we believe it is up to courts to use the language of the statutory law in decisions interpreting that law,” Stein said.
As Breitbart News reported, Jackson has a mixed record on immigration — twice striking down former President Donald Trump’s border controls but also upholding that federal agencies have broad authority to build a wall along the United States-Mexico border and ruling in favor of regulations to tighten up asylum rules.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.
Biden’s Supreme Court Pick Faces Array of Ethics Questions
A conflict of interest could trigger recusal from landmark affirmative action case
President Joe Biden and Ketanji Brown Jackson. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)Kevin Daley • February 26, 2022 5:00 am
SHARE
Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson will face ethics questions about her ties to left-wing public relations professionals, and a conflict of interest that could trigger her recusal from a landmark affirmative action case.
Jackson, whom President Joe Biden nominated Friday, has come under fire following a report that she retained PR gurus with deep ties in Democratic politics to assist with her prospective nomination. And Jackson's service on one of Harvard University's governing boards will prompt questions as to recusing herself from a lawsuit accusing the university of bias against Asians in admissions, which the High Court will hear this fall.
Republicans are still fine-tuning a response to Jackson's nomination. Beyond the ethics items, the nationwide spike in violent crime could play a major role in Republican maneuvering around her nomination. Jackson has deep experience in the criminal justice system as a former trial court judge and commissioner on the U.S. Sentencing Commission, a panel that offers guidance on criminal penalties.
Just hours before Biden officially nominated Jackson, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa) sent a letter to Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan pressing for details about Jackson's work with PR operatives Robert Raben and TJ Ducklo. Raben and Ducklo are Democratic loyalists who, according to a Feb. 16 Politico Report, helped ward off attacks on Jackson and connected reporters with the judge's allies during the selection process.
"It would be unusual, if not unique, for a candidate to enlist political communicators to assume this role," Grassley's letter reads.
Grassley is the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee and Srinivasan is chief judge of Jackson's court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
It's typical for judges jockeying for the Supreme Court to mobilize a volunteer network of ex-colleagues and former clerks to background reporters, lobby decision makers, and assist with nomination logistics. Those personnel, given their working relationship with the judge, are best positioned to speak to the judge's body of work, their personal characteristics, and their likely profile as a justice.
PR professionals from partisan Washington, D.C., outfits lack that kind of subject matter expertise and knowledge about the prospective nominee. As such, Republicans want to better understand what Raben and Ducklo were doing on Jackson's behalf, particularly if they seeded negative stories about her rivals in the press. One of Jackson's ex-law clerks edited Wikipedia entries for the judge's two main rivals early in the selection process, according to Politico. The edits meant to paint both contenders as more moderate than Jackson, seen as a progressive stalwart.
Grassley's letter also asks whether Raben and Ducklo coordinated with the D.C. Circuit's media relations office. Ducklo, a former White House press aide, resigned in February 2021 following reports that he threatened a female reporter.
Apart from the messaging dust up, Jackson will also face ethics and recusal questions related to a lawsuit that alleges that Harvard discriminates against Asian students in admissions. The High Court will hear that case later this year, and the plaintiffs are urging the justices to ban consideration of race in college admissions altogether.
Jackson serves on Harvard's Board of Overseers, one of the university's two governing boards. The board plays "an integral role in the governance of the university," through quality control, strategic advice, and external assessments of various departments, according to Harvard's website.
Recusal decisions are ultimately up to the justices themselves, who are not formally bound by an ethics code. Jackson may be able to distance herself from the controversy, such that she could participate, if she played no role in crafting or advising on admissions practices as an overseer. Recusal is also appropriate where there is reason to question a justice's partiality, but such arguments are often entangled with partisan agendas.
Solicitor general Elizabeth Prelogar, the Biden administration's top Supreme Court lawyer, obtained special authorization from the White House counsel and a senior Justice Department official to participate in the Harvard case despite a conflict of interest. Prelogar is a former university employee, having taught a class at Harvard Law School on appellate advocacy. Ethics rules required Prelogar to recuse from the case absent a waiver, and an oversight group is pressing for more information about the administration's decision to grant one.
The Harvard lawsuit will also supply Republican lawmakers with ample questions for the judge. The plaintiffs, an anti-affirmative action group called Students for Fair Admissions, used Harvard's own internal data to show Asian applicants inexplicably score lower than all other racial groups on the university's subjective personal evaluation. The personal score is one of four domains the university weighs in the admissions process.
The plaintiffs say the scoring outcomes reveal a pervasive "model minority" bias against Asians at Harvard. They also note Harvard's office of institutional research flagged the personal scoring disparity almost a decade ago, but the admissions office made no changes to its policy.
Those facts and many others offer Republican senators numerous avenues to pursue, given Jackson's leadership role at Harvard.
Meth disguised as onions in California drug bust
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKoLpXYdk_E&list=WL&index=14
Donald Trump: Democrats Claim Ukraine’s Borders ‘Sacred’ While Destroying Our Own
26 Feb 20220
2:38
Democrats have rushed to declare Ukraine’s borders sacred while destroying our own borders, former President Donald Trump said Saturday.
“What has happened in Ukraine is a catastrophic disaster. But it isn’t really that interesting that so many Democrat politicians in Washington, they seem to be rushing to microphones to declare that Ukraine’s borders are sacred,” he told the audience during remarks given at CPAC in Orlando, Florida.
Trump continued:
They want to say their borders are sacred, and we feel for Ukraine in so many ways, but Ukraine’s sovereignty must be defended at all costs, they say, even while they’re destroying our own borders and surrendering our own sovereignty. We have a border that’s a catastrophe. We have people coming into our country that we don’t want. They will not be good for our country.
Meanwhile, House Democrats have joined with several open borders organizations, some of which are financially tied to billionaire George Soros, in working to stop the surveilling of illegal aliens who crossed the border into the United States, Breitbart News exclusively reported Wednesday.
Per the article:
In a letter drafted by Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), Chuy Garcia (D-IL), and Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), the House Democrats go after the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency’s Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP) that monitors and tracks nearly 151,000 border crossers and illegal aliens released into the U.S. interior while awaiting their immigration court hearings.
However, Trump noted on Saturday, “The most important duty of every elected lawmaker is to protect and defend America, and that begins with protecting and defending America’s borders.”
He said under Joe Biden’s leadership, “we’re losing our country,” adding the Biden administration “spent months obsessing over how to stop an invasion of a foreign country, thousands of miles away.”
“You can’t defend western civilization if you would not be able to defend your own civilization. And that means we need borders that work, elections that are fair and free and not rigged, and crime that must be immediately stopped in our cities,” he commented.
Meanwhile, Ukraine’s Defense Minister, Oleksii Reznikov, recently said officials gave 18,000 submachine guns and ammunition to civilians and militia members after Russian leader Vladimir Putin ordered the invasion of country on Thursday.
HIGHLY GRAPHIC!
IMAGES OF AMERICA UNDER LA RAZA MEX OCCUPATION… gruesome!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/10/america-la-raza-mexicos-wide-open.html
BEHEADINGS LONG U.S. OPEN BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX: The La Raza Heroin Cartels Take the Border and Leave Heads
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/05/highly-graphic-la-raza-heroin-cartels.html
HIGHLY GRAPHIC VIDEO!
LA RAZA DRUG CARTELS CUT OUT HEART OF LIVING MAN.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/01/highly-graphic-la-raza-herion-cartel.html
EXCLUSIVE: Mexican Cartel Terrorizes Border City After Cops Arrest, Surrender Fugitive to U.S. Authorities
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
ILDEFONSO ORTIZ and BRANDON DARBY
26 Feb 20220
4:08
The arrest in Mexico and repatriation of a U.S.-born Gulf Cartel member who had pending warrants in Texas on murder charges triggered a violent response by the criminal organization.
The case began last week when U.S. authorities received information that Obed Pena, who was wanted in Texas on murder charges, was living in Tamaulipas, U.S. Customs and Border Protection revealed in a statement.
On Thursday Tamaulipas state authorities captured Pena in the town of Diaz Ordaz. Mexican officials coordinated with CBP for his repatriation to the United States.
Information shared with Breitbart Texas by Tamaulipas state authorities revealed that during the arrest, they seized three vehicles, three radios, and several makeshift road spikes.
Pena is wanted in connection with a 2021 Hidalgo County murder. Breitbart Texas confirmed with various U.S. and Mexican law enforcement agencies that Pena was a local leader with the Gulf Cartel in the areas west of the border city of Reynosa.
By Thursday afternoon, Gulf Cartel gunmen began a series of attacks throughout Reynosa. The cartel focused on shooting out police surveillance cameras and used large trucks in an attempt to knock down the concrete poles used to hold the cameras, information provided to Breitbart Texas by the Tamaulipas government revealed.
Gunmen also carried out similar attacks in the cities of Diaz Ordaz, Miguel Aleman, and Camargo. The attacks continued into Friday night and early Saturday morning. Various videos on social media showed cartel members using stolen buses and trucks to ram the poles used to hold the police cameras.
While local residents reported hearing numerous shots being fired throughout the city, authorities claim that on Thursday night, no clashes took place between Gulf Cartel gunmen and authorities. They also claimed there have been no reports of injuries in Reynosa during the attacks.
By Friday morning, Mexican soldiers clashed with cartel gunmen in the city of Miguel Aleman whre they tried to remove blockades set up by the cartel.
Gulf Cartel gunmen also placed several banners throughout the region addressed to Mexican President Lopez Obrador, where they claim Tamaulipas Governor Francisco Cabeza de Vaca and his state police forces have been terrorizing the region.
Cabeza de Vaca called the Gulf Cartel actions a series of vandalism attacks in response to operations against criminal activity.
“We are not going to give up a single space to the criminal groups we are going to move forward firmly and with determination” Cabeza de Vaca responded in a prepared statement shared with news outlets. “In other parts of the country, they act differently, not here in Tamaulipas.”
Ildefonso Ortiz is an award-winning journalist with Breitbart Texas. He co-founded Breitbart Texas’ Cartel Chronicles project with Brandon Darby and senior Breitbart management. You can follow him on Twitter and on Facebook. He can be contacted at Iortiz@breitbart.com.
Brandon Darby is the managing director and editor-in-chief of Breitbart Texas. He co-founded Breitbart Texas’ Cartel Chronicles project with Ildefonso Ortiz and senior Breitbart management. Follow him on Twitter and Facebook. He can be contacted at bdarby@breitbart.com.
“J.C. Sanchez” from Breitbart Texas’ Cartel Chronicles project contributed to this report.
Report: Biden to Divert Agents from U.S. Southern Border, Send Them to ‘Assist’ with Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Brandon Bell/BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images
24 Feb 20220
2:30
President Joe Biden’s administration is looking to divert United States Border Patrol agents from their mission at the U.S.-Mexico border to send them overseas “to assist” those fleeing from Ukraine amidst Russia’s invasion, a new report states.
Even as illegal immigration continues pouring through the nation’s southern border at record levels, Biden hopes to entice Border Patrol agents to sign up voluntarily to aid American citizens, green card-holders, and their immediate relatives fleeing Ukraine into Eastern Europe.
John Solomon at Just The News, who exclusively obtained the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) memo, detailed the effort dubbed “Operation Support Ukraine:”
“The Office of Field Operations is seeking volunteers to assist with the possible evacuation of U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, and their immediate family members from Ukraine.,” the memo sent to field operations executives said. [Emphasis added]
“Eligible employees who volunteer for this situation may be selected to serve a temporary duty assignment in Poland to facilitate travelers for entry into the U.S., to include providing guidance and problems resolution to other government agencies.” [Emphasis added]
…
The memo said volunteers need to be ready to deploy “within 2-3 days” of selection and should plan for about a month’s work overseas. It also offered a plan for COVID-19 mitigation that said workers need to either have the vaccine or natural immunity from a recent infection. [Emphasis added]
Last month, Border Patrol agents apprehended nearly 154,000 border crossers. Roughly 2.1 million border crossers and illegal aliens are expected to arrive at the southern border this year.
Since October, according to Fox News’s Adam Shaw, about 220,000 border crossers successfully crossed into the U.S. via the southern border, undetected by Border Patrol.
In January, alone, the Biden administration released more than 62,500 border crossers and illegal aliens into the U.S. interior. Border Patrol agents have blasted Biden’s policies, which they say have made illegal immigration close to unmanageable.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.
No comments:
Post a Comment