ISLAM IN GERMANY
Young Children in Critical Condition After Mass Stabbing in France Syrian Asylum Seeker Arrested
Syrian asylum seeker arrested by French police after a man entered children’s playground with a knife, the attack leaving three in critical condition in Annecy, France.
Update 1330 BST: Youngest victim is 22 months old
More details emerging from local media in France citing police and investigation sources. The young victims, reports outlets including France’s CNews are a German citizen who is a 22-month-old boy who was flown to hospital in Geneva for emergency care, a two-year-old boy, a three-year-old girl, and a three-year-old girl with UK citizenship. A 70-year-old man was also stabbed in the neck.
A French police officer (L) and French elite mountain infantry force ‘Chasseurs Alpins’ stand guard near the lake in Annecy, central-eastern France on June 8, 2023, following a mass stabbing in the French Alpine town. Seven people, including six children, have been injured in a mass stabbing in the town of Annecy in the French Alps, security sources told AFP. A man armed with a knife attacked a group of children aged around three years old as they played in a park near the lake in the town at around 9:45 am (0745 GMT), a security source who asked not to be named and a local official told AFP. (Photo by OLIVIER CHASSIGNOLE / AFP) (Photo by OLIVIER CHASSIGNOLE/AFP via Getty Images)
As for the alleged perpetrator, Abdalmasih H. has residency as an asylum seeker in Sweden and is married to a Swedish citizen, but for reasons unknown also applied for asylum status in France in 2022. It is reported this application was rejected just last week because he was already awarded refugee status in Sweden. Liberation reports when the Syrian migrant filled out his application for asylum status, he claimed to be a Christian.
According to a report of Le Dauphine, the attacker is known to a park employee in Annecy, as he has been seen hanging around the area for the past two months. The local told the paper: “the guy comes to sit on a bench every day for two months, dressed in black, black backpack, dark glasses, bearded… He didn’t speak”.
Another said he hung around the park every day “from morning to night”.
Warning: distressing content
The original story continues below
At least six people including four very children were injured in an apparent knife attack in Annecy, a picturesque mountainside town popular with tourists for its proximity to Alpine ski resorts, on Thursday morning.
Early reports indicated one adult and four children were injured, but that figure later rose. According to France’s Le Figaro, two children and one adult are in critical condition, but all the children involved are in a state of “absolute emergency”, so says a police source.
It is reported the children impacted in the attack are just three years old.
Footage of the arrest of a suspected perpetrator was filmed by bystanders and broadcast on national television. Images of the scene show a bearded man wearing a black t-shirt and what is described as a “turban”, carrying a knife.
Reports state the suspect is 32-year-old a Syrian man named Abdalmasih who has an asylum application lodged in France in 2022, and refugee status in Sweden as well. He is not said to be known to police.
French police personnel maintain a secure cordon in Annecy, south-eastern France on June 8, 2023, following a mass stabbing in the French Alpine town. Seven people, including six children, have been injured in a mass stabbing in the town of Annecy in the French Alps, security sources told AFP. A man armed with a knife attacked a group of children aged around three years old as they played in a park near the lake in the town at around 9:45 am (0745 GMT), a security source who asked not to be named and a local official told AFP. (Photo by OLIVIER CHASSIGNOLE / AFP) (Photo by OLIVIER CHASSIGNOLE/AFP via Getty Images)
Security personnel gather in Annecy, south-eastern France on June 8, 2023, following a mass stabbing in the French Alpine town. Seven people, including six children, have been injured in a mass stabbing in the town of Annecy in the French Alps, security sources told AFP. A man armed with a knife attacked a group of children aged around three years old as they played in a park near the lake in the town at around 9:45 am (0745 GMT), a security source who asked not to be named and a local official told AFP. (Photo by OLIVIER CHASSIGNOLE / AFP) (Photo by OLIVIER CHASSIGNOLE/AFP via Getty Images)
This story is developing, more follows.
Supreme Court-Bashing Kamala Harris Says Israel Needs 'Independent Judiciary'
Vice President Kamala Harris, who for years has bashed the U.S. Supreme Court when it disagrees with her politics, on Tuesday lectured Israelis about the need for "an independent judiciary."
Harris's comments, which came at the Israeli embassy's reception for the anniversary of the country's founding, were a reference to Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu's judicial reforms, which the Biden administration opposes.
While Harris spoke about the sanctity of the Israeli judiciary, she does not appear to feel the same about the U.S. Supreme Court. As a senator, she said that constitutionally above-board confirmation hearings for Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett were a "sham" and "an illegitimate process," respectively.
Following the Supreme Court's decision last year to overturn Roe v. Wade, Harris blasted the body as "an activist Court" that took away a "constitutional right." She went on to cast doubt on the ruling's legitimacy, saying she had "great concern about the integrity of the Court."
Israeli foreign minister Eli Cohen said that Harris in her Tuesday remarks didn't know what she was talking about, Reuters reported.
"If you ask her what troubles her about the reform, she may not be able to cite even one clause that bothers her," Cohen told Israel's public broadcaster. "I don't know whether she read the bill. My estimation is that she has not."
Netanyahu has suspended the reforms to negotiate a consensus with opposition parties.
Update 1:43 p.m.: This piece has been updated for clarity since publication.
Published under: Benjamin Netanyahu , Hypocrisy , Israel , Kamala Harris , Supreme Court
Abbas’ Sour Stemwinder at the UN General Assembly
Why 45 member states boycotted his speech.
In his sour stemwinder at the UN General Assembly, as part of its observance of Nakba Day on May 15, Mahmoud Abbas likened Israel to Nazi propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels, in its use of the big lie which, if repeated often enough, begins to be believed. What were those “ big lies” told by Israel that reminded him of Goebbels? Abbas didn’t say. Nor did Abbas refer to his own monstrous lie, contained in his doctoral thesis — that first denied the Holocaust ever happened and then, in the slightly revised published version of his thesis, he engaged in Holocaust minimization, by insisting there could not have been more than a few hundred thousand Jews, or — at the very most – 800,000, who died in Nazi camps, and that of those, many were not killed but succumbed to typhus and other diseases. A serial liar, Abbas was last year widely criticized for a speech accusing Israel of perpetrating “50 Holocausts” — a charge for which he offered not the slightest evidence. “The UN Must Not Repeat Its ‘Nakba Day’ Farce,” by Colin Rubenstein, Algemeiner, May 30, 2023:
He also blamed the US and Britain for the “Nakba,” saying that Israel was created for their own “colonial goals” and “these countries wanted to get rid of their Jews.”…
Israel was not created by anyone except the Jews themselves. The British did not fulfill their solemn commitment, as holders of the Palestine Mandate, either to “facilitate Jewish immigration” or to “encourage close Jewish settlement on the land,” both of which were required of it by Article 6 of the Mandate for Palestine. In fact, in the British government’s White Paper of 1939, at a time of maximum peril for the Jews of Europe, Great Britain limited immigration to Palestine to 15,000 Jews a year for each of the next five years, after which all Jewish immigration would be subject to an Arab veto. More than a million Jews might have been saved had they been allowed into Palestine in the late 1930s, and during the first years of the war. But the British didn’t allow them to come, despite being required to “facilitate Jewish immigration” into Mandatory Palestine.
After the war, the British continued to prevent Jewish refugees, survivors of the Nazi camps, from entering Palestine. Instead, the Royal Navy turned back a total of 142 vessels of varying sizes, carrying desperate Jewish refugees who wanted to go to Palestine after spending time in DP camps in Europe. The Exodus was the most famous of these ships. It carried 4,500 Jewish men, women, and children from DP camps in Europe to Palestine, but the British navy intercepted it on its voyage. Eager to make an example of it, the British forced the ship to land at Haifa, but instead of letting the passengers disembark, they were forcibly loaded onto three British navy transports which returned them to Europe. The ships first tried to unload their passengers at Port-de-Bouc, France, but they refused. And then those passengers. including many orphaned children, forced the issue by declaring a hunger strike which lasted 24 days, hoping they would be brought back to Palestine. The British government instead transported the passengers to Hamburg, where they were again interned in German camps like those they had fled. The British record as holder of the Mandate for Palestine was shameful; instead of encouraging Jewish immigration, they tried – beginning in the late 1930s – to prevent Jews from arriving. When Arabs attacked Jews in Mandatory Palestine, the British were largely indifferent, or in some cases, arrested Jews, such as Vladimir Jabotinsky, whose only crime was to help organize a Jewish defense force. When Arab mobs began to systematically murder Jewish men, women, and children in Hebron in 1929, the British police never arrived to stop the slaughter of 67 Jews, and the expulsion of the rest. Only during the Arab Revolt (1936-1939), when the Arabs attacked British soldiers as well as Jews, did the British suppress – arrest or kill – Arab attackers. Otherwise the Jews of Mandatory Palestine were on their own, without British protection. The one British officer who sympathized with the Jews, and helped them form self-defense groups, the “Special Night Squads,” that could take the fight to the Arab enemy, was Captain Orde Wingate. For having sided with the Jews, Wingate was sent back to London. Yet Abbas claims that Great Britain helped, with the US, to “create” Israel “for their own colonial goals.”
As for the US, as a nation it did very little to help create the Jewish state. Individual Americans, both Jews and non-Jews, did help, contributing money, and smuggling small arms into Israel which helped during the 1948 war, when a universal embargo on arms was imposed, supposedly on both sides. But in reality, the British continued to send weapons to Jordan’s Arab Legion, which was led by British officer Lt.-General John Bagot Glubb, “Glubb Pasha.”And the Arab Legion was the only Arab fighting force that was not roundly defeated by the Haganah, but managed to hold onto the West Bank. The Arab armies of Egypt and Iraq had been well-supplied with British arms; the Jews were desperate for weapons. Fortunately, one country, Czechoslovakia, was willing to ignore the embargo and sell arms to the Jews of Palestine.
The first deal between the Jews of Israel (the Yishuv) and Czechoslovakia was signed in January 1948 and it was not cheap. The Israelis obtained some 400 tons of mortars and other heavy machinery, aerial bombs, rifles, ammunition, machine guns, flamethrowers, explosives, tanks, and combat vehicles from the Czechs. In subsequent deals, the Israelis bought twenty-four Czech-built Avia S-199 fighters, a lesser version of the German Messerschmitt, that helped stop an Egyptian attack on Tel Aviv. In the fall of 1948, .the Israelis bought another 61 surplus Spitfires from the Czechs. Without those Czech arms, in the opinion of David Ben Gurion, Israel would have lost the war.
Abbas claimed that Israel’s membership in the UN was conditioned on its acceptance of a Palestinian right of return, but this is complete nonsense. Israel became a member of the UN in May 1949. No Arabs then spoke of a “right of return.” They spoke only of their desire to destroy the Jews of Israel, who had just humiliated the defeated Arabs. Nor, in 1949, was there any mention of the acceptance by Israel of a Palestinian state being one of the conditions for Israel’s admission into the UN. Let’s remember that after the 1948 war, Egypt held Gaza, and Jordan held the entire West Bank, but there was not a peep from either country, or from any other Arabs, about creating a “Palestinian” state from those two territories. Egypt and Jordan were not about to yield the territories they had managed to seize in the 1948 war in order to create a Palestinian Arab state. Mahmoud Abbas knows this perfectly well, but was counting on his UN audience to be both ignorant, and confused, about such critically important facts.
More attention is given to Israel at the UN Human Rights Council than is devoted to the entire rest of the world. Two permanent UN committees are “devoted to demonizing” Israel. That is their only task. In addition, within the Secretary-General’s office there is now a “Division of Palestinian Rights.” And at the UN there will now be two “special days” concerning the Palestinians. First, there is the newly-created “Nakba Day,” that was first celebrated this past May 15; second, there is an annual Day of International Solidarity with the Palestinian People, that is held on November 29, the same day, in 1947, when the UN Partition Plan was put up for a vote, and unanimously rejected by the Arabs.
One good bit of news is that Abbas’ speech at the UN was widely boycotted. Forty-five countries – including, as one Israeli journalist put it, almost all of the “countries that count,” boycotted Abbas’ speech. The U.S., Canada, the U.K., Australia, and 10 members of the EU joined Israel and 30 other countries in that boycott. That must have stung Abbas and his fellows: where was that “international solidarity with the Palestinian people” that they had assumed would be displayed?
The Palestinians received generous peace offers from Israel in 2000, 2001, and 2008. In the 2008 offer, made by Ehud Olmert to Mahmoud Abbas, Israel offered to give the Palestinians 93.7% of the West Bank, 100% of Gaza, and to compensate for the 6.3% of the West Bank that Israel would retain, territory where all of its major settlements were located, Olmert offered as compensation to give the Palestinians Israeli land that was equivalent to 5.8% of the West Bank. In addition Olmert offered to withdraw from Arab neighborhoods of east Jerusalem and, most important of all, he agreed to surrender the Old City to rule by an international body. Yet this offer, like the two previous ones made to Arafat, was turned down. And ever since, when Israel has tried to restart bilateral peace talks, Mahmoud Abbas has not responded. He spends his time not trying to make a deal with Israel, but in whipping up international hostility toward the Jewish state, sometimes with ridiculous alarums about how “Al-Aqsa is in danger,” in the hope that other countries will be able to pressure Jerusalem into yielding all of the West Bank, and eastern Jerusalem, including the Old City, as well.
It would be pleasant to think that the Biden Administration will spend some of its political capital during the next year to try to persuade enough members of the General Assembly to refuse to renew the “Nakba Day” observance that Abbas wants to be made permanent. Or if that turns out to be impossible to achieve, then at least the American government should be persuading or pressuring more countries to join the 45 member states of the UN that this year refused to listen to Abbas’ rant. But is the Biden Administration capable of exerting such pressure? We’ll see, next May, how well the Bidenites have done in minimizing the attention paid to “Nakba day.” Don’t get your hopes up.
Horowitz Video: The Moral Depravity of the Democrat Party
Freedom Center founder condemns Democrat treason.
[Order your copy of David’s new best-seller, Final Battle: HERE!]
Freedom Center founder David Horowitz recently spoke at The Brown Palace in Denver, Colorado on May 2, 2023 about the moral depravity of the Democrat Party — including the Marxist takeover of our schools, the corruption of the 2020 election, and much more.
Don’t miss this inspiring speech below — but first, read David’s personal letter to all FrontPage Mag readers:
Dear FrontPage Reader,
My new book has been a runaway bestseller.
But it’s being censored.
Almost a total ban.
Even though my book sales far, far surpassed other bestsellers — The New York Times won’t include me on their bestseller list.
All the major networks — including Fox News — won’t even mention “Final Battle: The Next Election Could Be the Last.”
Frankly, I was stunned by Fox’s reaction.
That was until Tucker Carlson was fired.
You should know my book reveals the Left’s end game: creating a one-party, authoritarian socialist state in this country.
Soon after Tucker was fired, he released a video saying a “one-party state” had arrived.
As I discuss in “Final Battle” — the left believes conservative and dissenting voices must be shut down.
Consider that Tucker was the #1 cable news host in America.
And he was shut down.
Consider President Trump was “president” and the leader of the Republican Party today.
And he has been shut down by major media.
I was told President Trump was shocked when he first read “Final Battle.”
A friend told me that he said this book “explains it all.”
I was grateful for President Trump’s strong endorsement for “Final Battle.”
He even posted an urgent message to Truth Social, telling Americans everywhere “Get David Horowitz’s book ‘Final Battle’.”
Dennis Prager, one of the nation’s leading conservative thinkers who heads PragerU, said he agrees with Trump, writing:
“‘Final Battle’ may be the most devastating book-length indictment of the Democratic Party yet written.
This is nothing less than a handbook for the salvation of the United States of America.”
All the major media — even Fox News — is banning any mention of “Final Battle” as it soars to the top of the bestseller lists . . .
To order a copy today, please CLICK HERE ……………….. Thank you for all of your support!
Sincerely,
David Horowitz
David Horowitz – “The Moral Depravity of the Democrat Party” from DHFC on Vimeo.
Transcript below:
Thank you all for coming.
About this time twenty years ago I was sitting in the dining room at this very hotel, meeting with the Republican leadership of the state legislature headed by my friend John Andrews who would have been here tonight except that it’s his birthday and he had a prior engagement with his family.
In those days Colorado was still a red state. Bill Owens whom I had already met with was governor and John was leader of the Senate. Chairing the meeting was my dear friend Steve Schuck who is here with us tonight.
Steve is the most generous and dedicated man I know. Over the past twenty and more years he has been a great friend and supporter of mine and of the Freedom Center, and of this event.
I also want to thank Shari Williams head of the Leadership Program of the Rockies, who couldn’t be here herself but encouraged her members to come.
The title of my new book – Final Battle: The Next Election Could be the Last – may seem like hyperventilation, but in fact it is a sober and disturbing portrait of where we are as a nation. Which is why Donald Trump has not only endorsed my book but has used its title Final Battle to describe his presidential campaign. It is also why for four straight months it has been the #1 best-selling book on elections and politics on Amazon.
“Woke” has become a term to describe the enemies of our country who have colonized our schools and taught our next generations to hate America, hate white people and trash our history and national pride. How to explain this travesty? It began fifty years ago when the anti-American, Marxist left set its sights on taking over our schools.
In fact the purpose of my meeting at the Brown Palace twenty years ago was to launch a national campaign for an Academic Bill of Rights that would protect students from indoctrination by these leftwing ideologues who were busy transforming our schools into indoctrination and recruitment centers for Marxist causes and the Democrat Party. The key agenda of my Academic Bill of Rights was that students should be presented in a fair and dispassionate manner with both sides of controversial questions, and should be assigned readings representing both sides as well.
Knowing that the previous decades had witnessed a large-scale purge of conservatives from university faculties, the very first principle of my Academic Bill of Rights was that no faculty member could be hired, fired, promoted or demoted for their political views. The next day the Denver Post’s lead editorial was an attack on me and my proposal warning that a conservative right-winger from California had come to Colorado for the purpose of getting liberal teachers fired. The Brazen Lie culture of the left was already firmly entrenched …. And very effective at intimidating conservatives and Republicans.
Many of you may have thought that the takeover of our educational system by anti-American Marxists happened overnight. It didn’t. It was five decades in the making. But conservatives and Republicans chose not to notice it. And when they did notice it, they were reluctant to fight.
If you want to understand the disasters that have befallen our country, you have to begin with the failure of Republicans and conservatives to aggressively wage the political war necessary to defend it.
The anti-American left attacks patriotic Americans as “white supremacists,” “racists” “domestic terrorists” and “insurrectionists.” And we respond by calling them “liberals.” There is nothing about them that is liberal. They are vindictive bigots, determined to demonize and destroy us.
Their intimidation has been working like a charm. While Senator Andrews was able to get Republicans to support the principles of my Academic Bill of Rights they were only prepared to support a “Resolution” not a law. So it lacked any teeth to enforce it. The Democrats were happy with this result, and John was able to put together a Joint Resolution supported by both parties which passed both Colorado chambers unanimously.
But the cynical Democrats, as usual, were acting in bad faith, and nothing happened as a result. The Democrats had achieved their goal of supporting the transformation of the educational system into an indoctrination and recruitment Center for the anti-American political left.
I wrote 5 books documenting the Marxist takeover of the schools They sold about 100,000 copies and I had high level contacts with Republican leaders like Newt Gingrich and Speaker John Boehner. I also created a national organization called Students for Academic Freedom. However, nothing came of our efforts but toothless resolutions like the one in Colorado.
Boehner even inserted a Resolution endorsing the Academic Bill of Rights into the Education Authorization Act, which meant that federal funds would be withdrawn from any institution that didn’t implement its principles. That’s if it was formulated as a law. But it wasn’t.
The result of these failures was the destruction of our educational system and the atrocities committed against our youth today from gender transitioning behind parental backs to teaching that America was created in 1619 as a white supremacist slave state.
The Democrat Party is no longer controlled by a liberal left but by Marxist zealots who willfully disregard the Marxist atrocities and failures of the past. Democrats no longer respect the sovereign individual, the rule of law, or the primary values of the Constitution –the equality of races, the spirit of compromise or the decentralization of power.
Instead, Democrats regard the Constitution as a white supremacist document written by rich white slaveowners, designed to oppress all other genders and races. Its mentality is that of European fascism and Soviet communism, and its immediate goal is a one-party state.
This is actually a bad news/good news story. The bad news is that the tremendous damage to our country was made possible because Republicans and patriots failed to address the threat when it could have been nipped in the bud. The good news is that we can take our country back if we’re willing to fight now.
2. The 2020 Election
I came tonight ready to talk about some of the themes of Final Battle: The Next Election Could Be The Last. The public debate about the 2020 election like all public debates has been framed by Democrats’ readiness to demonize their opponents and make brazenly false accusations about their actions and motives. According to Democrats the 2020 election was the fairest, most just election ever. Anyone who questions this preposterous conclusion, moreover, is committing an unthinkable act of treason – and constitutes an existential threat to our democracy.
In the real world, as opposed to this fiction, Democrats themselves have questioned the legitimacy of every single presidential election that Republicans have won since 1980. They have done so by going to the well of the House to call for the de-certification of Republican electors.
The reality is that Democrats have been stealing elections since the days of Tammany Hall, and their alliances with big city mafias. It is a widely accepted fact that John F. Kennedy was elected by the narrowest of margins with the help of Sam Giancana and the Chicago mob who stuffed the ballot boxes and voted the cemeteries in Cook County.
Here’s the reality of the 2020 election, which Biden officially won by .027% of the vote or 43,000 votes out of 159 million. In other words roughly 20,000 out of 159 million votes could have changed the result.
It is often overlooked that in this election President Trump became the only sitting president in the history of the country to increase his vote total in seeking a second term, which he did by increasing it 11 million votes to 74 million. Biden, who campaigned from his basement got 80 million votes if you can believe the official tally, or roughly 16 million more than Obama at his peak.
These results didn’t happen by normal campaigning. In July 2020, six months before the presidential election, the Democrats sent out a task force of 600 lawyers and 10,000 volunteers, whose mission was to change the election rules and tip the scales in Biden’s favor.
According to the U.S. Constitution, the election rules are set by the state legislatures. But in key battleground states like Georgia and Pennsylvania, as a result of Democrat lobbying the election rules were not set by the legislatures that Republicans controlled. In Georgia they were set by a backroom deal between a Trump-hating Republican Secretary of State and Hillary Clinton’s fixer law firm, Perkins Coie.
In Pennsylvania, where Republicans also controlled the state legislature, the election rules were set by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court which had a 5-2 Democrat majority. Eleven days before the election they removed the signature verification requirement. Now why would they do that, except to cheat? And in fact one ballot dump of 570,000 votes in the middle of the night in Pennsylvania assigned 99.4% of the votes to Biden and only .6% to Trump.
To protest travesties like this, the Trump team submitted 61 lawsuits with massive documentation of irregularities. None of this evidence was ever examined.
Trump felt abandoned by the Republican legislatures that allowed the Democrats to ignore the Constitution and deliver election authority to Democrat-controlled entities that would tilt the scales in their favor.
In changing the election rules, the Democrat task force did not pursue random agendas but followed a strategic plan, based on how their changes would make it easier to cheat.
Their model was provided by the Carter-Baker Commission on Election Reform. The 2000 Bush-Gore election had irregularities that eventually had to be resolved by the Supreme Court which decided the election in favor of Bush. The problems with election integrity were so severe that in 2005, Jimmy Carter and Bush’s former chief of staff formed the bi-partisan Carter-Baker Commission. The Commission issued a report listing the chief reforms necessary to ensure election integrity and make cheating more difficult.
In 2020, the strategy adopted by the Democrat task force was to reverse every recommendation of the Carter-Baker Commission and make cheating easier.
Number one of the Carter-Baker recommendations was to avoid the use of unsolicited paper ballots. It described these as “the main source of potential voter fraud.” In the 2020 presidential election, Democrat secretaries of state sent out 44 million unsolicited paper ballots dramatically increasing the opportunities for voter fraud.
The second key recommendation of the Commission was to increase the number of laws requiring voter I.D.’s to cast a ballot. The Democrats launched an endless smear campaign against voter I.D.s calling them Jim Crow 2.0 – a racist attempt to suppress minority votes. There was zero evidence to back up this claim since minorities were voting in record numbers in states with voter-I.D. laws. Other reforms recommended by the Commission were to ban third party ballot harvesting opaerations and unguarded ballot boxes. In other words to prevent voting by proxy. All of these voting methods were required by the new rules the Democrats put in place.
January 6th was the date set to certify the electors. On that day Trump gave his famous “Stop the Steal” speech, which has been maliciously described by Democrats as a criminal “incitement to insurrection.” This was absurd on its face, since Trump had offered the Capitol Police and Nancy Pelosi 10,000 national guardsmen to control the crowds. Trump’s offer was duly noted by the Inspector General who attended the meeting. Pelosi and the Democrat-controlled Capitol Police rejected the offer.
In his Stop the Steal speech, Trump described some of the more egregious ballot-fixing actions of the Democrats, blamed the looming loss of the election on “weak Republicans” who allowed these changes in the law to happen. He urged his followers to march “peacefully” and “patriotically” to the Capitol to stiffen weak Republican spines.
If you fail to do so, Trump added, you must go home and primary the weak Republicans so we can win the next election.
You could not imagine a speech less insurrectionary or more respectful of the democratic process than that.
Later that day, a relatively peaceful protest took place inside the Capitol that was immediately attacked by the Democrats as an “armed insurrection” and the most heinous crime in American history comparable to 9/11 and the burning of the White House in 1812.
More likely, this was the biggest lie in American history. No arms were found among the 800 or so people arrested. This forced the Democrats to revise their smear and call it just an insurrection. But you can’t overthrow the government without arms. That didn’t deter Democrats from ritualistically describing January 6th as an “insurrection” driven by white supremacy and Islamophobia as though that was reality instead of a hoax. The Democrats also claimed that 5 Capitol police officers were killed by the demonstrators. The correct number is zero. Four of the deaths were suicides months after the 6th and one was by a Trump supporting Capitol Police officer who died of a stroke in his bed at home on January 7. But shameless Democrat leaders like Joe Biden and Hakeem Jeffries were still repeating this lie as late as last fall.
Only one person was shot and killed on January 6th in the Capitol. Ashli Babbitt was a five-foot tall air force veteran who was unarmed and threatening no one when she was murdered by a Capitol police officer. The murder was captured on video. Nancy Pelosi hid the identity of the shooter for months while she quashed any investigation, then publicly exonerated him, and gave him a medal.
A real investigation – if it would have been allowed to happen could have led to the conclusion that Pelosi was an accomplice to murder. This is a measure of how criminal the Democrat Party has become.
3. The Biden Regime
Biden’s inauguration was January 20. He began with a brazen lie that he would unify the country and represent both those who voted for him and those who did not.
Then he issued a series of executive orders that illegally and unconstitutionally nullified our immigration laws, and welcomed a flood of unvetted illegals from 200 countries to invade our country. This was the greatest crime ever committed by our government against its own people.
Here’s a glimpse of its impact: In 2018 the Government Accounting Office issued a report on the number of illegal migrants in American prisons and jails in the five years between 2011 and 2016. Keep in mind that during Joe Biden’s first two years in office more illegals entered the country than in all twelve years of the Obama and Trump presidencies combined. So you can probably multiply the following figures by a factor of 3.
According to the Government Accounting Office, in the five years between 2011 and 2016, there were 730,000 illegals in U.S. prisons and jails. They accounted for 4.9 million arrests thanks to the revolving door that Democrats have provided criminals with and 7.5 million crimes. These crimes included 1 million drug arrests, 500,000 assaults, 134,000 sexual assaults, 24,000 kidnappings, 33,000 homicides and 1500 terrorist-related events.
Even worse in measuring the moral depths to which the Democrat Party has sunk is to consider the fate of unaccompanied minors under their rule. Recall Democrats’ outrage when Trump arrested the illegal parents of 4000 minors who were not allowed under American law to accompany their parents to prison while they were being processed for deportation.
They remained in the facilities that Obama had built, cared for by Border Patrol. Democrat outrage knew no bounds. Biden personally accused Trump of “ripping babies from the arms of their mothers” and put in cages reminiscent of Auschwitz. This slander was hammered home by Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and every other leading Democrat. “It’s criminal” Biden said in disgust. Responding to the faux outrage, Trump ended the policy within two months.
But when Biden took charge f the Oval Office, he made it a point to welcome unaccompanied minors to come to the United States, assuring them they would not be deported.
So instead of 4,000 parentless kids temporarily separated, the number exploded to 250,000 with 100,000 of those “lost” – that is, somewhere in the United States unknown to our government and in the tender care of ruthless drug cartels, sex traffickers and other criminals ready to rape and exploit them as child laborers in jobs that adults won’t do.
This unconscionable treatment of migrant children is a horrifying stain on our country, inflicted by the morally depraved leadership of the Democrat Party.
What is the goal of this radicalized party that leads to such atrocities? It is the dismantling of the American system and its replacement by a totalitarian state.
In addition to his illegal destruction of America’s borders, Biden announced at his inaugural that the main theme of his domestic policy would be “Equity” – by which he meant a government redistribution of resources, wealth and privileges by skin color. To justify this policy Biden claimed that America was and had always been a systemically racist society, and that systemic racism touched every aspect of American life.
These were monstrous lies, worthy of our most dedicated enemies, which, thanks to the radical takeover of the schools have become the dominant view of America’s record on race relations. It is an attitude designed to destroy our country and its political system by making Americans ashamed of their national heritage, and actual achievements in providing opportunity to all.
For the record, there is no systemic racism in American institutions. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 specifically outlawed systemic racism. If any institution was systemically racist there would be a tsunami of lawsuits filed by racial ambulance chasers like Benjamin Crump, extracting million-dollar penalties for violations of the Civil Rights law and the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. There is no such tsunami because there is no systemic racism.
The war on white people is really a war on America, its creation, and its future. It is a weapon selectively used to demonize Republican politicians who belong to the party of Lincoln and support Martin Luther King’s vision of a color-blind society. This was also the vision of the founders, which is why the words “white” and “black” do not appear in the Constitution.
The anti-white racism that pervades the outlook of the Democrat Party and informs its policies is no more subtle than the anti-black racism of the Ku Klux Klan. But it doesn’t emanate from the fever swamps of America’s backwater regions. It has been manufactured and promoted in the editorial rooms of the New York Times and the boardrooms of the Pulitzer Foundation, the offices of the teacher unions and the faculties of our universities and schools, which makes it far more dangerous.
Here’s two ominous results. We now have a serious problem of recruitment in our military because the Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Mark Milley, are anti-white racists who have made the demonization of white America a core element of military training.
Our system of justice is also imperiled by this anti-white racism. We have just appointed an anti-white racist to the U.S. Supreme Court who is such an ideologue that she can’t tell you what a woman is. She has been appointed to a position whose only job is to defend the Constitution but she is a believer in Critical Race Theory which maintains that the Constitution, a document that does not contain the word “white” is a white supremacist contract that should not be respected.
America is not now and never was a racist country. It is true that in the effort to defend slavery, southerners developed a poisonous anti-black ideology that flooded the region with racism.
But American slavery itself was not a racist institution. If it were – and America is a white supremacist country – how can you explain the existence of 500,000 black citizens who were free on the eve of the Civil War? You can’t.
Slavery existed in Africa for a thousand years before a white man ever set foot on the continent. Slavery in America was an imported institution. Virtually every black slave shipped to America was enslaved by black Africans and sold to Americans at slave auctions in Ghana and Benin. They were, in turn, freed by historic sacrifices made by mainly white Americans, 360,000 of whom made the ultimate sacrifice to set blacks free.
In all history there is not another case of one race making such sacrifices to free another.
Every nation needs to be proud of its history in order to defend itself. Americans can be proud of ours.
4. Gospel of the Fuhrer
How do I justify the subtitle of my book: The Last Election Could Be the Last? In fact, I finished it too soon to capture the Democrats’latest attempt to cancel our democracy. Mobilize corrupt Soros district attorneys like Alvin Bragg, to smother your political opponent with bogus indictments that could land him in jail or tied up in so many court proceedings that he couldn’t reach his constituents.
But the real threat can only be assessed by gauging the mentality of one’s opponents. For example, how committed are Democrats to the legal system under which we live? Here’s an incident you may be unaware of.
January 2, 2021 happened to be the one-year anniversary of the death of General Qasim Soleimani, whose assassination Trump had ordered. Soleimani was the leading terrorist in the world. He was responsible for thousands of American deaths including every wounded warrior blown up by an I.E.D. that you see on television. The Democrats condemned Trump’s decision to kill Soleimani because he was a “government official.” They said to kill this terrorist-mastermind was “provocative.”
The Iranian regime took a grimmer view. Its dictator Rouhani said that Trump would not only be removed from office – he had already lost the rigged election – but “he would be removed from life. We cannot forgive the killing of Soleimani.”
As you can imagine this threat led to a scrambling of White House security officials, led by the president’s military adviser General Milley. Details of how Milley led these security meetings were provided by two Washington Post reporters who were present.
According to the Post reporters, Milley’s “chief concern” was not the Iranian threat to the American president but remarks Trump had made in tweets that night regarding the 2020 election. Milley described Trump’s Stop the Steal speech as “the Gospel of the Fuhrer.” He told close aides that listening to President Trump was “like reading George Orwell’s 1984. “Lies are truth. Division is unity. Evil is good.” “This is a Reichstag moment” he said.
Milley went on to call Trump’s supporters “the guys we fought in World War II.” “They’re Nazis.” He proposed ringing the Capitol with barbed wire and 25,000 troops – not to keep out the Iranian terrorists, but to keep out the Maga Republicans and their alleged domestic terrorist threat. “We’re going to put a ring of steel around the Capitol,” he said, “and these Nazis aren’t going to get in.” Of course, no threat ever materialized.
Even more disturbing than these ravings by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was their endorsement by American elites. “You know what Milley was doing,” said CNN’s Anderson Cooper, “which you know was obeying the Constitution…. That’s what a patriot does.”
Actually, it would be hard to imagine a clearer form of treason.
In America’s constitutional order, the military is under civilian control, and the president is the commander-in-chief.
Yet Republicans failed to notice or mention this betrayal, and expose the extent of Democrat malice in the process.
Our country is in deep trouble. It can only be saved if actual patriots will step up and answer the call.
No comments:
Post a Comment