OBOMB HAS ALWAYS BEEN GOOD TO THE MUSLIM DICTATORS BUT THEN THEY'VE RENTED HIM FROM DAY ONE.
OBAMA’S WAR ON THE JEWS
The Democrats are now officially the party of Jew-hatred. This is largely due to the disastrous presidency of Barack Hussein Obama. PAMELA GELLER
https://globalistbarackobama.blogspot.com/2019/03/the-disaster-of-barack-obama-democrats.html
Abunimah’s piece -- and Obama’s numerous anti-Semitic associations -- got little attention. Throughout his life Barack Obama has been close friends with numerous virulent anti-Semites: Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, Khalid al-Mansour, Rashid Khalidi and others. PAMELA GELLER
“Of course, one of the main reasons the nation is now “divided, resentful and angry” is because race-baiting, Islamist, class warrior Barack Hussein Obama was president for eight long years." MATTHEW VADUM
joe biden and his muslim terrorist
everyone will be WIPED out in 48 hours
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jdB81SuwEQ
Barack Obama’s Puppet Appeases Iran
In 2012, then-president Barack Obama announced new U.S. sanctions against foreign banks that helped Iran sell its oil. He said the sanctions would increase pressure on Iran for failing to meet its international nuclear obligations. “If the Iranian government continues its defiance, there should be no doubt that the United States and our partners will continue to impose increasing consequences.”
Sanctions on Iran played well in the MSM.
In 2013 in Jerusalem, Obama spoke about Israel’s security. He told Israelis, “Strong and principled diplomacy is the best way to ensure that the Iranian government forsakes nuclear weapons. ... And I have made the position of the United States of America clear: Iran must not get a nuclear weapon. ... America will do what we must to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran.” Obama had said in 2012 that the U.S. will “always have Israel’s back” and called Israel one of America’s “greatest allies,” saying the bond between the two nations was “unbreakable.”
However, Obama spewed empty words. Disregarding what he said about Israeli security and having its back, Obama “implemented” (he circumvented the U.S. Constitution to do so) in 2015 the Iran nuclear agreement, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Under it, the U.S. suspended sanctions on the sale of oil and trade, and other financial sanctions, which had crippled Iran’s economy. In return, Iran agreed to scale back its nuclear program (it did not). The JCPOA’s critics said it was flawed because it didn’t halt all Iranian nuclear activity. Iran also got relief from E.U. and U.N. sanctions and was granted access to frozen assets. The JCPOA infused Iran with cash. By lifting oil and financial sanctions on Iran, billions of dollars’ worth of Iranian assets, mostly revenues from oil sales, were unfrozen. Its central bank gained control over more than $120 billion in foreign exchange reserves. Besides, Iran never fully complied with the JCPOA and repeatedly reneged on nuclear nonproliferation obligations it agreed upon.
The JCPOA was Obama’s primary foreign policy initiative.
In what has to be two of Obama’s most severe slaps in Israel’s face, he refused in December 2016 to sign a renewal of sanctions against Iran. Perhaps he knew that the sanctions would become law anyway, but the symbolism of what he didn’t do was unforgivable.
Then, with his 2012 election behind him, with a month to go as president, no longer needing to fool Jews or Gentiles again, despite what he had said about always having Israel’s back, Obama slipped a knife into Israel’s back. He abstained (via his ambassador) from voting and thus allowed a U.N. Security Council resolution that condemned Israel over settlements to pass. He pretended the resolution was simply a restatement of longstanding U.S. opposition to Israeli settlements.
These are only two of a string of insults Obama foisted on one of America’s closest allies.
As if Obama’s insults weren’t bad enough, the U.S. government, in 2018, traced some of the $1.7 billion Iran had gained access to, courtesy of the Obama administration, to Iranian-backed terrorists. Iran used the cash to pay its primary proxies, the Lebanon-based terrorist group Hezb’allah and the Quds Force, Iran’s main foreign intelligence and covert action arm and part of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps.
Alex Titus wrote in 2018 about Obama’s Iran policy: “America’s failed policy of appeasing the Iranian regime is over.” It seems Titus was incorrect. Obama’s keen iterest in achieving an understanding with Iran wasn’t over. The bumbling idiot who currently occupies the Bully Pulpit has seized Obama’s Iran baton. What Joe Biden has essentially done is created Obama’s “third term,” extending Obama’s appeasement of Iran.
Under Trump’s sanctions, Iran’s funds had fallen to below $8 billion. The nation could barely keep its economy afloat. Iran was essentially broke and couldn’t finance terrorist groups. Once Joe Biden took office, Iran’s funds increased to at least $80 billion. Most of the money came from selling oil to China. Larry Kudlow wrote, “In 2020 Iran sold China roughly $6.5 billion worth of oil. Next year in 2021, that mysteriously jumped to $23 billion. Then last year, in 2022, that oil sale mysteriously leaped to $30 billion. ... If we didn’t lift the sanctions, how come they’re producing and selling all that oil?”
Talks to salvage the JCPOA convened in Vienna in 2022. Biden’s negotiating team, led by Robert Malley, U.S. special envoy for Iran, had negotiated an even weaker nuclear agreement with Iran than the one that Obama’s team achieved. Has the agreement been effective? No! Despite appeasement from Biden designed to get the Iranians to behave, Iran has continued to test missiles, manufacture drones, pursue near-weapons-grade uranium, and pump money and weapons to its “Axis of Resistance,” which includes Hamas, Hezb’allah, and Islamic Jihad. Three other U.S. negotiators resigned in protest at those talks over concessions made by Malley. The resignations should have triggered a recall of Malley by Biden or secretary of state Antony Blinken. But they didn’t. They gave Malley freedom to negotiate whatever he wanted as long as he got Iran to sign. They let Malley concede issue after issue to the detriment of U.S. national security. Russian negotiator Mikhail Ulyanov said Iran got much more than it could have expected and bragged about how Russia, China, and Iran got dozens of wins over the United States.
Those talks were suspended because they had “reached a phase that requires ‘political decisions’ to be made quickly.” That caused the Biden administration to restore sanctions waivers for Iran. Biden pledged to try to bring the U.S. back to the talks. Blinken told Congress that restoring the waivers would help the talks. The State Department assured us that the sanctions waivers “is not a concession to Iran.” However, JCPOA revival talks are all but dead despite sanction waivers. The net result is that sanction waivers are funding terrorists.
Can anyone say, “Iran is taking advantage of Joe Biden”? John Bolton has. And since Biden is an extension of Obama, Iran’s taking advantage of Obama as well.
Obama continues to appease. He wrote on his Medium page a pseudo-intellectual, equivocating statement about Hamas’s attacks on Israel and its response. The statement was saturated with his characteristic condescending miasma of narcissism, egoism, and self-congratulating. Within the statement was his prescription for peace: “while the prospects of future peace may seem more distant than ever, we should call on all of the key actors in the region to engage [spelled n-e-g-o-t-i-a-t-e] with those Palestinian leaders ... because that is the best and perhaps only way to achieve the lasting peace and security most Israeli and Palestinian families yearn for.”
Bottom line: The Mideast has been a tangled mess for decades, but things got much worse under Obama. One reason is that the JCPOA didn’t make anyone in the Mideast, Europe, or the U.S. safer. But it did empower the mullahs in Tehran, who funded terrorism on Israel’s borders. They patiently bided their time until they got another anti-Israel president in the White House. They got one!
Image: Chickenonline via Pixabay, Pixabay License.
BIDEN AND OBOMB: TWO PIG PARASITE LYING LAWYERS ON THE TAKE
Biden and Islamophobia
I was hoping against hope that Joe Biden would totally and irrevocably expose the evil of radical Islam in speaking of the dastardly Hamas attacks.
But once he asserted that “we must also, without equivocation, denounce Islamophobia” in bis October 2020 speech to the nation, it was patently clear that he had fallen into the clutches of those who would demand utter capitulation to Islamists and thus destroy free speech, and independent thinking.
Islamists would assert that "Islamophobia is “an allegedly irrational fear of losing life or liberty to Islamic rule merely because the laws, sacred texts, and traditional practices of Islam demand the submission of culture, politics, religion and social expression. But, in the real world, it is a product of rational observation.”
After all “[a]n ideology that has as its stated goal to put the entire world under its eternal rule, by force if necessary, and to kill those who stand in its way, criticize it or leave it, is genuinely dangerous. Having some healthy doses of fear and skepticism of such a force is perfectly rational.”
As thereligionofpeace.com explains that:
To obscure the fact that the same problems and reactions follow Islam into every country, no matter how tolerant, a word has been invented to suppress any assessment or criticism of Islam.
Consider that Hinduism is different in almost every way from every other major world religion, but no one is accused of having Hinduphobia.
In fact, Islam is the only religion that requires a pretend word to protect against critical inquiry. The sole purpose of ‘Islamophobia’ is to conflate ideological truth with anti-Muslim bigotry. The irony is that of all religions, the tenets of Islam are the least tolerant and most hostile toward the others.
Sadly, “[i]t appears that the inventors and purveyors of ‘Islamophobia’ have succeeded beyond their dreams in silencing criticism of Islam. In fact, those who would criticize Islam include such Islamophobes as
Christians, Sikhs and Jews who don’t want to be forced into a political system that treats them as third-class citizens (Islamic teaching).
Atheists who want the freedom to live openly and challenge religious orthodoxy in the public sphere (Islamic teaching).
Women who don’t want to be draped in black bags (Islamic teaching).
Heterosexual males who prefer not to see women draped in black bags (Islamic teaching).
Wives who don't want to be beaten (Islamic teaching).
Drinkers (Islamic teaching).
Artists and art lovers (Islamic teaching).
Historians who don’t want to see priceless manuscripts and books burned just because they disagree with the Quran.
Homosexuals who don’t want to be beaten to death or thrown from a building (Islamic teaching).
Anyone else who believes that consenting adults should not be killed or tortured over sexual practices (Islamic teaching).
Dog lovers (Islamic teaching).
Animal Rights activists and anyone else who is opposed to the cruel and unethical treatment of animals (Islamic teaching).
Mothers who don’t want their daughters killed over a man’s ‘honor’ (Islamic teaching).
Intellectuals who value freedom of conscience and public dissent (Islamic teaching).
Anyone believing that the value of a person's life is not determined by their religious beliefs (Islamic teaching).
Feminists who believe that women should not be made subordinate to men by a religion which openly insists that females are the intellectual and legal inferior of males (Islamic teaching).
Anyone else who objects to a religion in which a woman’s identity is defined by her relationship to a man (Islamic teaching).
Secularists who believe in the separation of government and religion (Islamic teaching)
The left-handed (Islamic teaching).
Liberals who don’t believe that culture and moral values should be established by a state-sponsored religion (Get past The Religion Barrier).
Conservatives who believe in preserving the Western heritage responsible for the civil freedom, political liberty and economic success which has attracted the flood of immigrants from Muslim nations, where such values are conspicuously lacking (Islamic teaching).
Muslims who would like the freedom to leave Islam (Islamic teaching).
Consequently, it truly isn’t Islamophobia when they really are trying to kill you. Why didn’t Biden just recite Hamas’ beliefs in their own words?
So when Biden equates Islamophobia with anti-Semitisim, he is aiding the very enemy which despises Jews and wants to exterminate them. He is acting as the agent for those who loathe freedom. Antisemitism is a calculated ideology of hatred for the Jews. Islamophobia is an artificial term created to hide the genuine fear of a brutal social system.
In 2017, Ed Brodow explained
The effort to defend against Islamic terrorism has been cut off at the knees by a thought crime known as Islamophobia: a dislike of, criticism of, or prejudice against Islam or Muslims.
Author and activist Pamela Geller, explains that Islamists ‘consider any critical examination of Islam to be blasphemous and subject to the death penalty.’ The term Islamophobia was invented in the 1990s by a front group of the Muslim Brotherhood in order to export Islamic blasphemy laws to the West.
In fact, Muslim writer Abdur-Rahman Muhammad reveals the original intent behind the concept: ‘This loathsome term is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliché conceived in the bowels of Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.’
Islamophobia is classic political correctness. You don’t have to deal with the substance of arguments against Islamic extremism. All you have to do is label critics a cluster of ‘Islamophobes.’ If this lie prevails, we become infinitely more vulnerable to terrorism and the negative impact of Islam because we are afraid to talk about them. As a manipulation, it has been highly effective.
In the US, the thrust of the Islamophobia strategy is to (a) accuse Americans of harboring a deep prejudice against Muslims, (b) convince the public that, as a result, Muslims are disproportionately targeted by perpetrators of hate crimes and acts of discrimination, and (c) suppress any and all criticism of Islam and Muslims.
In 2011 Martin Peretz explained that “[a]t the end of the 1970s, Iranian fundamentalists invented the term ‘Islamophobia’ formed in analogy to ‘xenophobia.’ The aim of this word was to declare Islam inviolate. Whoever crosses this border is deemed a racist.
...The term ‘Islamophobia’ serves a number of functions: it denies the reality of an Islamic offensive in Europe all the better to justify it; it attacks secularism by equating it with fundamentalism. Above all, however, it wants to silence all those Muslims who question the Koran, who demand equality of the sexes, who claim the right to renounce religion, and who want to practice their faith freely and without submitting to the dictates of the bearded and doctrinaire.
Islamophobia—that is, the word itself—is meant to silence you.
At Focus on Western Islamism, author Soeren Kern reveals that Islamists are deliberately exaggerating discrimination against Muslims in the West to silence critics. In essence, “[t]he main objective is to smash any criticism of Islamism [.]” Here are some examples of what is considered Islamophobic. See Report.
In Finland, the European Islamophobia Report (EIR) claims it is ‘Islamophobic’ for students to be required ‘to speak only Finnish at school.’
The country report for France was authored by a UK-based specialist on ‘spatialized Islamophobia’ who ‘focuses on the omnipresence of Islamophobia across spatial scales.’ She asserts’that it was ‘Islamophobic’ for President Emmanuel Macron — whom the EIR brands as ‘the world leader of Islamophobia’ — to initiate a crackdown on political Islam, which seeks to replace the liberal democratic order with a new political system based on Islam and the Qur’an.
In Greece, the European Islamophobia Report [EIR] contends that it was ‘Islamophobic’ for the government to publicly state that ‘slaughtering animals without anaesthetizing them is unconstitutional and should be forbidden.’
Consequently, “[l]ike the previous seven annual editions of the EIR, the 2022 edition does not provide a precise definition of ‘Islamophobia.’ Instead, it promotes a highly subjective and expansive notion of ‘Islamophobia’ — a notion that falsely views any perceived slight as proof positive of pervasive Muslim persecution and victimhood in Europe.”
The “EIR is replete with pseudo-scientific terminology such as ‘subliminal Islamophobia,’ ‘internalized Islamophobia,’ ‘contemporary Islamophobia,’ ‘institutionalized Islamophobia,’ ‘state Islamophobia,’ and ‘undirect [sic] Islamophobia.’ It warns of ‘systematic signaling of Islamophobia,’ ‘systemic Islamophobic practices,’ and “potentially Islamophobic situations.”
How can we defeat the enemy when we so easily fall prey to their word salads, lies, and deceptive manipulations?
Eileen can be contacted at middlemarch18@gmail.com
Image: Screen shot from ABC News via YouTube
Joe Biden touted as a ‘key’ figure and a ‘wartime’ leader?
Yesterday, The Hill ran an article labeling Joe Biden as a “wartime leader” and it opened with this:
President Biden is emerging as the key leader in Israel’s war against Hamas, with a grief-stricken Israeli society deeply distrustful of its government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Biden’s solidarity with the Israeli public has earned him enough political capital to delay Israel’s anticipated ground offensive, even as the country is fully mobilized for war and anxious for revenge.
A “key leader” in Israel’s operations against Hamas? What?!
Ever since Joe Biden took office, he has idiotically said climate change is the greatest existential threat to the U.S. and the world. Not Iran with its “death to America” pledges… not China with its dystopian communism, American farmland grabs, and land acquisitions near military bases… not North Korea with its nuclear bombs under the control of an unstable leader… not the Mexican cartels and their human butchery….
Nope, the greatest threat is a hypothetical and miniscule temperature increase in the next hundred years or so. The Biden administration then pretends they can prevent this from happening if they could just stop Americans from using crude oil and gas-powered vehicles and equipment… which greatly rewards China.
Iran and Russia also love this abject ignorance and arrogance, and appreciate Biden’s generosity as he has greatly increased the demand for their oil, thus driving up their revenue, which they use to wage war against their enemies.
While China, Iran, Russia, and others build their military, we fire healthy people who make the choice to decline participation in experimental pharmaceutical trials.
These enemies of the U.S also know how we left Afghanistan, creating a vacuum for the Taliban to take charge and seize all the military equipment we abandoned.
We repeatedly appease Iran by saying we can’t tell if they had any involvement in the October 7th attack on Israel. They fund and train terrorists, but somehow we have no idea if they were directly involved. Can we all yell B.S. already?
But, according to writers at The Hill, Biden’s speeches have made him a great wartime leader. So Biden essentially funds the terrorists, and somehow has the trust of the Israelis?
A large number of terrorists have been apprehended at the border, but somehow we don’t know their names. How many people on the terrorist watch list have successfully evaded capture and lie in wait? We have no idea, because Biden’s DHS routinely withholds details on “terror suspects” nabbed at the southern border. We do know many Chinese are coming in though, and I am sure it is not for our benefit….
No matter how much Biden and his team have appeased (not blamed) and funded Iran, the regime doesn’t seem to appreciate our help very much.
It doesn’t seem to worry when Biden finger-wagged its leaders with the stern words “Don’t. Don’t. Don’t.” on 60 Minutes. I wonder why those firm words didn’t change the nation’s mission of death to Israel?
And, Iran just warned the U.S. that we are in the crosshairs too, if Israel’s retaliation in Gaza continues. From Reuters yesterday:
Iran’s Foreign Minster [sic] Hossein Amirabdollahian warned at the United Nations on Thursday that if Israel's retaliation against Palestinian militants Hamas in the Gaza Strip doesn't end then the United States will ‘not be spared from this fire.’
It appears to me that Biden and his team are much more similar to Neville Chamberlain than they are to FDR or Winston Churchill. They appear to believe we can negotiate with terrorists and evil leaders, like the tyrants in Iran, instead of the reality that they must be forcefully put in their place. Japan and Germany were obliterated. World War II did not end because of appeasement, and firm but gentle words.
Hitler would not have stopped killing Jews if FDR had simply said “Don’t. Don’t. Don’t.”
From Townhall:
In the 1930s, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain took one look at the Nazis and decided it was best to just give Hitler what he wanted, lest he draw the ire of his fighting forces. ‘Appeasement,’ to Chamberlain, was apparently preferable to standing up against Hitler’s evil aspirations.
The Biden administration is also more focused on Trump supporters than actual terrorists. Maybe that is why they had no idea that Hamas had been training and preparing for the attack, for years, and why they seem to be incapable of blaming Iran.
None of this self-inflicting damage will be over until the government starts treating our real enemies like enemies, and abandons boogeyman villains.
Image: Free image, Pixabay license, no attribution required.
Iran’s Top Diplomat: U.S. ‘Will Not Be Spared from This Fire’ if It Continues to Support Israel
Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian threatened further attacks against the United States and its interests at the U.N. General Assembly meeting in New York on Thursday.
Iran is already launching rocket and drone attacks against bases housing American personnel in Iraq and Syria, using Shiite militia groups controlled by the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). U.S. forces have been able to intercept most of these attacks, but dozens of minor injuries have been reported.
“I say frankly to the American statesmen, who are now managing the genocide in Palestine, that we do not welcome expansion of the war in the region. But if the genocide in Gaza continues, they will not be spared from this fire,” Amirabdollahian told the U.N. General Assembly.
Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian speaks at the General Assembly during the 10th Emergency Special Session at the 39th plenary meeting at United Nations headquarters on October 26, 2023 in New York City. The U.N. continues to meet to discuss the status of the Palestinians and the conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza (Eduardo Munoz Alvarez/Getty Images).
The Iranian foreign minister was referring to Israel’s carefully targeted bombing campaign against Hamas terrorists hiding behind human shields in Gaza, an operation that does not meet any legal or common-sense definition of “genocide.”
Hamas has made several debunked claims about civilian casualties, all of which the Iranian government insists on treating as credible. Hamas operatives have also sought to maximize civilian casualties by preventing Palestinian non-combatants from evacuating after advance warnings from the Israeli military.
Amirabdollahian nevertheless insisted on accusing Israel of “war crimes and genocide” at the United Nations, and he referred to Israel as an “occupying regime” even though it withdrew from Gaza in 2005, leaving it entirely at the mercy of the murderous government Iran supports.
The Iranian foreign minister turned reality on its head by claiming Hamas is a lawful “liberation” movement, even after it raped, murdered, tortured, and kidnapped more than 1,400 Israeli civilians in a hideous surprise attack on October 7. He cited Hamas propaganda to claim the United States and Europe have supported “the killing of about 6,000 civilians in less than three weeks by the Israeli regime in Gaza and West Bank of Palestine.”
“We recommend the US and the West to work for peace and security, not war against people, children and women. Actually, instead of sending rockets, tanks, and bombs to be used against Gaza, they should stop supporting genocide,” he huffed, saying nothing about Hamas’s callous murder of Israeli women and children.
Amirabdollahian claimed Gaza is part of Iran’s “home” and claimed West Asia is part of its “region,” so it feels justified in launching terror attacks to protect “our home’s security.”
“According to international law, the Palestinian liberation movement Hamas is fighting the occupation and has a legitimate right,” he said, without citing the international law that supposedly justifies tossing grenades into civilian shelters, beheading children, or raping women with such force that their bones crack.
The Iranian foreign minister claimed Hamas is “ready to release civilian prisoners,” without naming the Hamas officials who supposedly offered to do so.
Tal Shlomo, 29, reaches out to touch one of the posters showing the names and photographs of the hostages in Gaza on October 21, 2023 (Heidi Levine for The Washington Post via Getty Images).
“At the same time, the world should support the release of 6,000 Palestinians held in Israeli prisons,” he said.
Amirabdollahian switched to “the sweet Persian language” to offer a lengthy justification for Palestinian terrorism and war crimes. He claimed the grievances of the Palestinians justify every crime Palestinian terror groups commit, the October 7 horror must be viewed in the context of “about 80 years” of Palestinian complaints, and Hamas is merely fighting for “the Palestinian right of self-determination.”
Amirabdollahian demanded the U.N. enforce the demands of Hamas against Israel and claimed the only reason it hesitates to comply is interference from “the unwavering and permanent supporter of the occupying regime,” the United States. He said the U.S. was “irresponsible” for vetoing “cease-fire” proposals that would protect Hamas from Israeli retaliation.
US President Joe Biden joins Israel’s Prime Minister for the start of the Israeli war cabinet meeting, in Tel Aviv on October 18, 2023, amid the ongoing battles between Israel and the Palestinian group Hamas (MIRIAM ALSTER/POOL/AFP via Getty Images).
Amirabdollahian then called for Israeli genocide, using the preferred code language of the Palestinian terrorist groups and their sympathizers, by demanding a Palestinian state that would replace Israel “from the sea to the river”:
The entire land of Palestine, from the sea to the river, belongs only to the original Palestinians, including Christians, Jews and the Muslims and no institution or country has the right or can give any part of it to another person or group. This is a false illusion, a crude fantasy that may only come true in a dream. The Islamic Republic Iran believes in the right of the Palestinian nation to resist against occupation and has offered a political and democratic initiative which includes the holding of a referendum for self-determination amongst the original residents of Palestine which has been registered by the U.N.
The Iranian diplomat kept the terrorist jargon coming, accusing Israel of “genocide” a dozen times during his speech, claiming its “brutal occupation” has “transformed into brutal apartheid” or “deep apartheid,” and railing against the “Zionist regime.”
“The recent action of the Palestinian nation as well as the action of the liberation organization of Hamas against the occupiers, according to applicable rules of international law, is completely legitimate and is their inherent right, and attributing any other title to it is absolutely illegal and unacceptable,” he stated, dismissing arguments to the contrary as a “very ridiculous joke.”
Amirabdollahian treated the savage Hamas atrocity as a legitimate military operation called the “Al-Aqsa Storm,” which he described as “the volcanic eruption of the concentrated anger of the entire Palestinian nation against 75 years of continuous and widespread crimes by the Zionist regime.”
Palestinian Hamas militants (Chris McGrath/Getty Images)
“If the crimes of the Zionist regime continue, no one can stop the Muslims and the resistance forces. Therefore, those who constantly talk about the need to prevent the spread of the conflict must put pressure on the Zionist regime to immediately and completely stop their crimes,” he threatened.
Amirabdollahian even mentioned the utterly debunked Hamas hoax of the Israeli “bombing” of the Al-Mu’amdani Hospital in Gaza, which, in reality, was a relatively small explosion caused by a Palestinian Islamic Jihad rocket. The Iranian regime is apparently willing to stake what remains of its credibility on believing the Hamas account despite a mountain of evidence to the contrary, as Amirabdollahian claimed the attack was another example of “genocide” perpetrated by the “Zionist regime.”
Since the hospital explosion was actually caused by Islamic Jihad, this passage of the speech would stand as the only time Amirabdollahian mentioned a Palestinian crime in his entire lengthy diatribe.
Amirabdollahian concluded by threatening the United States again, warning against “the uncontrollable consequences of the unlimited financial, arms and operational supports by the White House to the Tel Aviv regime which have led to the expansion and added to the severity of the bombardments of the civilians and the Palestinian women and children in Gaza and the West Bank.”
No comments:
Post a Comment