KAMALA HARRIS PREPARES FOR HER PRESIDENCY - GEORGE SOROS IS RIGHT BEHIND HER DIRECTING TRAFFIC - JOE WILL BE IN PRISON OR A HOME FOR DISABLED BRIBES SUCKERS

 

Kamala Harris Taps Ageist Biden Critic as Campaign Communications Director

Brian Fallon (Paul Morigi/Getty Images)

Chuck Ross

December 12, 2023

Vice President Kamala Harris's latest hire has called for elderly public officials to step down and once mocked President Joe Biden for "trying to complete an answer" during a political debate.

Veteran Democratic operative Brian Fallon will serve as Harris's communications director on the campaign trail, according to the Washington Post. Fallon's résumé includes stints as spokesman for Hillary Clinton's ill-fated 2016 presidential bid and as head of Demand Justice, an activist group behind the movement to expand the Supreme Court.

Fallon has a history of comments that could prove awkward for his boss's boss. At Demand Justice, he spearheaded a campaign to pressure then-Supreme Court justice Stephen Breyer to retire because of Breyer's advanced age. A longtime Harris cheerleader, Fallon slammed Biden during a 2019 Democratic debate, writing on X, formerly Twitter, that "Biden trying to complete an answer is a tender moment," and criticizing Biden for his past collaboration with segregationists.

Biden, who was already the oldest president in history at the time of his inauguration, has rebuffed calls to end his 2024 campaign over concerns about his age. The president is known for his verbal gaffes and "strayed into a couple of hazy monologues" at the White House holiday party, Semafor's Ben Smith reported Monday.

The president's age isn't the only thing that could put him at loggerheads with Fallon. As the head of Demand Justice, Fallon claimed that failure to expand the Supreme Court would "let Donald Trump's justices make our mass shooting epidemic even worse." During the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020, Fallon stated, "Defund the police."

Biden has said he opposes the movements to defund police and to expand the Court.

Fallon has a much friendlier history with Harris, whom he praised for having "guts" during her questioning at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing of then-judge Brett Kavanaugh.

Fallon's group pushed numerous unfounded claims about Kavanaugh, expressing support for discredited Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick a day after the committee referred her to the FBI for investigation over her false claims of rape.

In defending Harris, Fallon offered one of his strongest criticisms of Biden as the future running mates duked it out for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination.

"​​White politicians and white commentators dont [sic] get to tell the two black candidates in the 2020 race they are wrong to take offense at Joe Biden's comments. Just stop," Fallon tweeted in June 2019. At a Democratic debate the day before, Harris and Sen. Cory Booker (D., N.J.) condemned Biden's praise for segregationists with whom he worked in the 1970s.

"A lot of people seem to be giving Biden a pass for that answer on slavery," Fallon tweeted during a September 2019 Democratic primary debate.

Fallon may have a harder time defending Harris now that he's on her payroll. Former staffers have described the vice president's office as toxic and expressed concerns at the prospect of Harris becoming president. Just 29 percent of Americans have a favorable view of Harris, according to a recent NBC News poll.

Update 4:15 p.m.: An earlier version of this piece incorrectly stated that Fallon mocked President Joe Biden for "trying to make a coherent answer." The words that Fallon actually used were "trying to complete an answer."

Published under: 2020 Election , 2024 Election , Biden Administration , Brian Fallon , Campaign , Court-Packing , Defund the Police , Demand Justice , Democratic Primary , Joe Biden , Kamala Harris , Vice President

DO YOU EVER GET SICK OF THEIR SHIT?

THIS CRAP IS PARTICULARLY INTERESTING AS KAMALA HAS COME OUT FOR PALESITINE AS HAS EMOFF'S DAUGHTER!

Kamala's husband gets Hanukkah embarrassingly (but usefully) wrong

By Andrea Widburg

Doug Emhoff is America’s “Second Gentleman” because he is married to Kamala Harris, America’s vice president. The Biden administration likes him because he’s amiable, leftist, and ostensibly Jewish. However, as his misbegotten Hanukkah tweet shows, he’s as Jewish as Joe Biden or Nancy Pelosi are Catholic (or Kamala Harris is black)…which is to say, not at all. It’s a garment they pull on only when they need it politically.

Hanukkah celebrates two things: First, it celebrates a huge victory in the 2nd century B.C. when the small Jewish colony of Judea dealt a stunning military defeat to their Seleucid Greek overlords. Second, it celebrates the great miracle of the oil.

When the Jews regained access to and control over their Temple, they discovered that the Greeks had desecrated it. The purification ritual (or “re-dedification”) required eight days of holy oil, but the Jews had only one day’s worth. However, thanks to God’s hand, that one day of oil lasted for eight days, with the eight Hanukkah candles commemorating that eight-day miracle.

Put another way, Hanukkah is a story of triumph, both military and spiritual. However, the “Jewish” Doug Emhoff didn’t quite see it that way. To honor the holiday, he offered a very different narrative in a now-deleted tweet:

The story of Hanukkah and the story of the Jewish people has [sic] always been one [sic] of hope and resilience. In the Hanukkah story, the Jewish people were forced into hiding. No one thought they would survive or that the few drops of oil they had would last.

But they survived and the oil kept burning.

During those eight days in hiding, they recited their prayers and continued their traditions. That’s why Hanukkah means dedication. It was during those dark nights that the Maccabees dedicated themselves to maintaining hope and faith in the oil, each other, and their Judaism.

In these dark times, I think of that story.

The X community’s response was swift, merciless, and very amusing:

There’s another thing wrong with the post, and that’s the picture. You can see that a vast chasm separates the two candles in the menorah. That’s all wrong. The candles are supposed to be lit in regimental order, one immediately after the other, with another added each night. Also, the fact that one is burned down while the other is just lit shows that this was a completely staged event, with Emhoff himself ignorant of how to proceed.

Image: Doug Emhoff and Kamala Harris (edited). X screen grab.

Emhoff, of course, deserves all the mockery he’s receiving. Having said that, I’m actually quite pleased about his ludicrous Hanukkah post because it perfectly illustrates a point I’ve been trying to make for a very long time, and one that becomes more important in a time of rising antisemitism: Leftist Jews are “Jews In Name Only” (aka JINOS).

JINOS are engaged in a form of Kabuki theater that sees them claiming the trappings of Judaism while being ignorant about the Jewish faith and entirely dismissive of Jewish values. Their Judaism is a fashion and lifestyle statement rather than a set of values. Their holy book isn’t the Torah (the first five books of the Bible), nor is their understanding of those books further illuminated by the Talmud or the Midrash (the ancient and determinative collected works of rabbinical teachings).

For JINOS, the holy book is Das Kapital (even if they haven’t read it), the exegesis is in the Democrat party platform, and the Temple is leftist academia. Those are the teachings and institutions that guide them, all of which are grounded in Marxist thought, not Judaism. They are the equivalent of Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi, two loud and proud “Catholics” who embrace and foist on America the same DNC, Marxist, statist values as the JINOS.

Just as you cannot judge a book by its cover, it’s an error to take on faith a person’s statement that he is “Jewish,” “Catholic,” “Muslim,” or “Protestant Christian.” If that person is a leftist, that person’s real faith is the Gospel of Marx.

Update: Below is an excellent segment from Caroline Glick, the pertinent point being her discussion about Hellenization.

KAMALA HARRIS   -  ONE MORE GAMER LYING LAWYER JUST LIKE JOE!

19. Why did your office  decline to investigate the health supplement fraud cases involving companies your husband’s law firm represented? Did you, as California’s attorney general, ever purposefully decline investigating or prosecuting clients of your husband’s law firm?

 The best-case scenario is that she’s a progressive who repeatedly violated her own principles so that she could promote her career. In the worst-case scenario, she’s just another corrupt, rotten, regressive prosecutor.                                        JESSER HOROWITZ

Kamala Harris poses for Thanksgiving photo in front of a gas stove

By Monica Showalter

What is it about kitchens that brings out Kamala Harris's inner phony?

Here's her latest, from a Thanksgiving photo released to the public:

 

 

 

 

She posed in front of a gas stove.

Here's the Biden-Harris administration's stance on gas stoves:

 

 

 

Gas stoves for me, but not for thee, is that how it goes? Only the nomenklatura get them?

Based on this picture, that sounds about right. And as for an additional phony factor -- why is she cooking so much food for a two-person Thanksgiving dinner? Maybe there are other people, but why are they not in the photo?

Harris, recall, is fond of very fancy cookware, which is how she spent her first visit to France, presumbly on the down time. She spoke English loudly in a Paris shop before plinking down $562 for some fancy cookware. That cookware goes nice on a gas stove, doesn't it?

Harris also posed in this kitchen before, when she donned an apron with factory folds, presumbly to make her famous jerk chicken. Nobody believed that.

Notice, though, that the kitchen is the same one in Brentwood, California that she posed in for her later kitchen pictures.

That's her gas stove all right and she's not giving it up to save the planet. Maybe the Bidenites ought to wise up to the fact that people are noticing.

Image: Twitter screen shot

 

19. Why did your office decline to investigate the health supplement fraud cases involving companies your husband’s law firm represented? Did you, as California’s attorney general, ever purposefully decline investigating or prosecuting clients of your husband’s law firm?

45 Questions the Media Should Ask Joe Biden and Kamala Harris

REBECCA MANSOUR

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden and his running mate Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) will appear in their first joint media interview on Sunday after accepting their party’s nominations this week.

However, unlike President Trump, Biden and Harris have thus far declined to take questions from the media in an open joint press conference where no questions or topics are off-limits.

In the event that such a press availability arises, here are 45 questions the media should ask them. This list is by no means exhaustive.

QUESTIONS FOR JOE BIDEN:

1. Why did members of your family keep getting lucrative business opportunities overseas while you were vice president?

2. How did your brother, Frank, secure $45,000,000 in taxpayer loans from the Obama administration for his Caribbean projects?

3. How did a newly-minted firm employing your other brother, James, receive a $1.5 billion contract to build homes in Iraq despite having no experience in construction or international development?

4. Why did your son Hunter accompany you on your official trip to Beijing in December 2013? What did he do on that trip? Who did he meet with? What should the American public make of the fact that just 10 days after this trip, your son’s boutique private equity firm secured a $1 billion investment deal from the state-owned bank of China (later expanded to $1.5 billion) despite having no prior experience in China, and with this deal, the Chinese government granted your son’s firm a first-of-its-kind arrangement to operate in the the recently formed Shanghai Free-Trade Zone—a perk not granted to any of the large established financial institutions?

5. Should the American public be concerned that your son’s private equity firm partnered with a Chinese government-owned aerospace and defense conglomerate to facilitate the purchase of an American company that produced strategically sensitive dual-use military technology that the Chinese government wanted?

6. Does your “Build Back Better” proposal contain any provisions to ensure that American taxpayer-funded technology is not bought off by Chinese state-backed enterprises working with private equity firms like your son’s?

7. Back in 2000, you voted in favor of giving permanent Normal Trade Relations (NTR) to China. At the time, you said that this would not lead to “the collapse of the American manufacturing economy” because China is “about the size of the Netherlands” and could not possibly become “our major economic competitor.” Furthermore, you predicted that free trade with China would establish “a path toward ever greater political and economic freedom” for the people of China. Do you still stand by these statements today after 3.4 million American jobs have been lost to China and millions of China’s citizens have been imprisoned, surveilled, disappeared, and used as slave labor by an increasingly authoritarian regime enriched by 20 years of record trade imbalances from flagrant trade violations?

8. The People’s Republic of China has a bold plan called “Made in China 2025” to dominate the key technologies of the future in order to overtake the United States militarily and economically. Do you still contend that China is “not competition for us”?

9. Why did you promote the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) to financial special interest groups when research was clear that the deal would make it easier for corporations to move U.S. jobs overseas?

10. Do you believe Xi Jinping kept his promise to Barack Obama to end cyber-espionage against the United States? If not, what are you prepared to do about it?

11. Do you accept that the coronavirus originated in China? Do you think China was honest with the world in its handling of the coronavirus? Are you satisfied with China’s explanations for how it spread? Do you believe their claims about the number of cases and fatalities in China?

12. Do you think China should be held responsible in any way for its handling of the coronavirus? If not, why not? What, if any, repercussions should there be for China in its handling of the coronavirus?

13. Did you suggest investigating Michael Flynn under the Logan Act, as Peter Strzok’s notes suggest?

14. You said in your DNC acceptance speech that America is ready to “do the hard work of rooting out our systemic racism.” What did you do in your 36 years as a U.S. senator and 8 years as vice president to root out systemic racism? Why didn’t it work?

15. You have called for “revolutionary institutional changes.” What does that mean in practice?

16. You have vowed to rescind the Trump tax cuts. Can you think of a single example of a country that recovered from a recession by raising taxes?

QUESTIONS FOR KAMALA HARRIS:

17. Why did you refuse to prosecute even one sexual abuse case involving the Catholic Church in San Francisco when you were attorney general, despite the pleas of victims’ groups?

18. Also, why did your attorney general’s office refuse to release the documents obtained from the San Francisco archdiocese with all the information about priests accused of sexual abuse? Victims’ rights groups have criticized your office for deliberately burying these documents and thereby covering up the crimes and leaving the public unprotected. Why did you do this? The San Francisco district attorney’s office claimed in 2019 that they no longer have these documents in their possession. What happened to them? How can you claim to be a defender of children when you declined to prosecute the abusers of children?

19. Why did your office decline to investigate the health supplement fraud cases involving companies your husband’s law firm represented? Did you, as California’s attorney general, ever purposefully decline investigating or prosecuting clients of your husband’s law firm?

20. You said you believed the women accusing Joe Biden of inappropriate touching. Do you believe Tara Reade? If not, why not? If so, how do you justify supporting him now?

21. You once attacked a judicial nominee on the basis of his membership in the Catholic fraternal organization the Knights of Columbus, which is the largest fraternal organization in the world and includes among its past and present members many prominent Americans like President John F. Kennedy, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), Gov. John Bel Edwards (D-LA), and Vince Lombardi. Do you believe that being a member of the Knights of Columbus disqualifies a person from holding public office? Would you refuse to hire someone on the basis of their membership in the Knights of Columbus or any other Catholic organization? In your questioning of this Catholic judicial nominee, you singled out the issue of the Catholic teaching on the sanctity of life. Would you disqualify a job applicant on the basis of their Catholic beliefs, including their beliefs about abortion? Do you believe that being pro-life disqualifies someone from employment?

22. Why did you single out journalist David Daleiden for prosecution for undercover journalism that others do without penalty?

23. Your chief-of-staff, Karine Jean-Pierre, wrote an op-ed last year attacking the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and Americans who associate with it, stating “You cannot call yourself a progressive while continuing to associate yourself with an organization like AIPAC that has often been the antithesis of what it means to be progressive.” Do you believe that pro-Israel activism is incompatible with progressive values?

24. The Biden campaign has adopted a version of the Green New Deal that calls for 100 percent renewable electricity generation by 2035. California has adopted similar “green” goals, but now it can’t keep the lights on due to the state’s reliance on wind and solar energy. California’s Democratic Gov. Gavin Newson admitted this week that the Golden State needs a “backup” plan for energy because the current blackouts caused by lack of wind and overcast skies have shown the danger of relying solely on “green” energy. Why would the nation fare any better than sunny breezy California in keeping the lights on if we adopt 100 percent renewable energy?

25. You said in the past that we “need to hold China accountable” for trade violations, but you are against the use of tariffs. How do you intend to hold China accountable? You also said that “we need to export American products, not American jobs.” How do you intend to make sure we don’t export more American jobs to China? How would your policy differ significantly from the same policies that led to the loss of 3.4 million jobs to China?

QUESTIONS FOR BIDEN OR HARRIS:

26. You both supported the George Floyd protests, which you claimed were peaceful. Have you spoken to any victims of the riots — people who lost loved ones or businesses?

27. Do you believe that the looting of the Magnificent Mile in Chicago was a “form of reparations,” as one Chicago Black Lives Matter organizer claimed? Is looting an appropriate form of protest as a means of reparations?

28. Seattle Black Lives Matter protesters stormed a neighborhood last week, demanding that residents “get the f*** out” and “give black people back their homes” as reparations. Do you support that style of protest?

29. If elected, would you object if protesters decided to tear down the statue of Andrew Jackson in Lafayette Square across from the White House? What about statues to Thomas Jefferson and George Washington? Would you be willing to sign a written pledge to protect our national monuments and statues?

30. What is the maximum number of illegal immigrants you would allow into the country before securing the border to stop more from entering?

31. The Obama administration deported an estimated 3 million illegal aliens. Was that a bad thing?

32. With 30 million Americans unemployed due to the coronavirus, would you support a halt on work visas for foreign workers competing with Americans for jobs?

33. Do you still support a ban on fracking? If so, what do you say to the estimated 7.5 million American jobs that will be lost due to such a ban, which includes an estimated 550,000 jobs lost in Pennsylvania, 500,000 jobs lost in Ohio, 363,000 jobs lost in North Carolina, 353,000 jobs lost in Colorado, and 233,000 jobs lost in Michigan?

34. Wall Street has praised the choice of Kamala Harris as VP. Why do you think financial special interests support her so much?

35. Will you be following the advice of your Wall Street and Silicon Valley donors in negotiating with China? If not, whose advice would you seek out in negotiating with China?

36. Do you support China’s actions in Hong Kong?

37. Do you support China’s actions in Xinjiang province where an estimated 3 million predominantly Uyghur Muslims are imprisoned in what the Pentagon has described as “concentration camps”? Are you concerned about the fact that Hunter Biden’s China-backed private equity firm invested heavily in the surveillance technology used to spy on the Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang province?

38. Do you disagree with how the Trump administration is handling Huawei? Do you think Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou should be extradited to the United States for trial?

39. Do you believe China’s Belt and Road Initiative is a form of colonialism or is it a good program that Third World nations should sign up for?

40. What are you prepared to do if China invades Taiwan or uses military force to assert its claims in the South China Sea?

41. Do you believe the U.S. should return to the Iran nuclear deal? Would you make further concessions to Iran to secure that? Do you believe the Iranian regime should be allowed to buy weapons again?

42. Are you pleased with the results of the Obama administration’s intervention in Libya?

43. Why did the Islamic State fold up so much more quickly under Trump than the Obama administration predicted?

44. Would you advise Arab nations to follow the UAE’s lead and make peace with Israel, or should they hold out for big concessions to the Palestinians?

45. Should the United States apologize for demanding NATO partners meet their financial commitments? If not, why didn’t the Obama administration ever do that?

Rebecca Mansour is a Senior Editor-at-Large for Breitbart News. Follow her on Twitter at @RAMansour.

 

Kamala Harris Failed to Investigate Client of Husband’s Law Firm as California Attorney General

HARIS ALIC

Democratic vice-presidential nominee Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) failed as California’s attorney general declined to investigate faulty advertising claims against one of the nation’s leading nutritional supplement companies, which also happened to be a client of her husband’s law firm.

As California’s chief law enforcement officer between 2011 and 2017, Harris racked up a record as a tough on crime prosecutor. From cracking down on school truancy to opposing marijuana legalization—with more than 1900 people being prosecuted for possession of the drug under her tenure—Harris was California’s self-acknowledged “top cop.”

That record, however, did not extend to clients of Venable LLP, the law firm where Harris’s husband, Douglas Emhoff, was a high-profile partner. Harris, in particular, failed on numerous occasions to investigate the nutritional supplement giant Herbalife. At the time, Herbalife was a high-profile client of Venable, paying the firm hundreds of thousands of dollars for its legal services every year.

One such instance occurred in 2015 when prosecutors from the San Diego-branch of Harris’s attorney general’s office sent her a “lengthy memorandum” expressing the need for an investigation to be opened into Herbalife for fraudulent marketing practices, according to Yahoo News. Even before the memorandum was sent, Herbalife had a long and complicated history in California, at one point even generating nearly one thousand complaints about its marketing practices.

It is unclear if Harris ever saw the memorandum in question as no investigation was ever opened by her office. More notably, shortly after the memorandum was sent by the San Diego prosecutors, Harris appeared at a $1,000-dollar-a-had fundraiser in Washington, D.C. hosted by the Podest Group, which then represented Herbalife as a lobbying client. Later that same year, Emhoff would be promoted to managing director of Venable’s West Coast operations.

This was not the only time that Harris declined to take action against Herbalife. In April 2015, Harris refused to join 14 other state attorneys general in asking Congress to open an investigation into the herbal supplements industry for not appropriately disclosing ingredients in their products. At the time, Herbalife was explicitly mentioned by the attorneys general as one of the companies that warranted further scrutiny.

The revelations are detailed more fully in Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite—a book released earlier this year by Peter Schweizer, a senior contributor at Breitbart News and president of the Government Accountability Institute.

Harris and her husband’s ties to Herbalife come back into view as the California lawmaker has catapulted onto the national scene after being chosen as Joe Biden’s running mate.

The best-case scenario is that she’s a progressive who repeatedly violated her own principles so that she could promote her career. In the worst-case scenario, she’s just another corrupt, rotten, regressive prosecutor.

                                                           JESSER HOROWITZ

Unethical conduct plagues legal career of Kamala Harris

By JESSER HOROWITZ

Posted on February 27, 2019 in Opinions

On Jan. 2019, U.S. Senator Kamala Harris declared her candidacy for President of the United States of America to great fanfare.

She earned quick praise and frequent comparison to former President Barack Obama. A recent Democratic Party straw poll by the Daily Kos ranked her in the top tier of Presidential candidates, with 27 percent of respondents voicing their support for her candidacy. So far, she has pitched herself to the American people as a strong progressive with a particular passion for criminal justice reform.

Harris has a reasonable chance at winning the Democratic Party nomination. She’s charismatic, smart and very likely to bridge the growing divide within the party between the progressive left and the centrists. If she wins the nomination, she might even defeat Donald Trump in the general election. I understand why some voters in the party have decided to rally around her: She’s a promising alternative for Democrats who want someone progressive like Bernie Sanders but better than he is at speaking to identity politics.

However, I would like to encourage my fellow Democrats to approach Senator Harris with a healthy dose of skepticism. As a prosecutor and California State Attorney General, Harris has engaged in blatantly unethical behavior for her profession and embraced positions that actively hurt her constituents. While this does not necessarily have to be a red line for everyone—and it certainly will not prevent me from voting for her should she win the Democratic nomination—our party should hold Harris’ feet to the fire here. Even more concerning than her past positions is that she refuses to own up to them, portraying herself as a long-time, progressive criminal justice reform activist.

I want to clarify that I have no inherent issues with a prosecutor being elected to the presidency. We need prosecutors; we need people who serve the public good rather than represent the interests of paying clients. However, if your job requires you to make decisions that could potentially ruin people’s lives, the ethical standards should be higher, not lower. If you, like Kamala Harris, decide you want to run for President of the United States, it becomes imperative that the public thoroughly and mercilessly scrutinizes every facet of your political career.

In 2015, law enforcement caught Robert Murray, a prosecutor in Kern County, committing one of the most egregious offenses a prosecutor could perpetrate. Specifically, he falsified a confession transcript that connected the defendant with a far worse crime than that with what he had actually been charged. When the defense demanded a copy of the original tape recording, Murray admitted to his crime but said that it was merely a harmless joke. The judge disagreed. He stated that the court refuses to tolerate such outrageous conduct and dismissed the indictment on the grounds of prosecutorial misconduct (Observer, “California Prosecutor Falsified Transcript of Confession,” 03.04.2015).

How does this incident involve Senator Harris? At the time, she was the Attorney General of California. In that capacity, she appealed the indictment. According to Sidney Powell of The Observer, this was the third time she had appealed a prosecutorial misconduct dismissal in less than three months. As of March 2015, Murray was still allowed to work as a prosecutor (Observer, “California Prosecutor Falsified Transcript of Confession,” 03.04.2015).

As Attorney General, Harris has a history of fighting to keep men she knew were innocent in prison and of hiding cases of significant illegal activity conducted by law enforcement. In 1999, Daniel Larsen was sentenced to 27 years to life in prison for possession of a concealed weapon. There had been nine witnesses who could testify that Larsen was not guilty, but the court called none of them at the trial because of his incompetent and now disbarred attorney. With the help of the Innocence Project, he was able to prove his innocence, and the court overturned his conviction in 2009.

How does this involve Senator Harris? She challenged his release not because she believed he was guilty—she did not dispute his innocence—but because he hadn’t presented proof of his innocence quickly enough. And so, she fought to keep a man she definitely knew was innocent behind bars for life (NBCLosAngeles, “After 13 Years in Prison, Man Found Innocent of Crime Freed,” 3.20.2013).

In another incident, law enforcement discovered that Deborah Madden had purposely sabotaged the drug results of multiple cases as a technician at a San Francisco crime lab. But even though the highest levels of the district attorney’s office knew about Madden’s unreliability as a drug expert, Kamala Harris and her office hid this information from defense attorneys. Superior Court Judge Anne-Christine Massullo ultimately ruled that Harris’ office had violated defendants’ rights through this act of prosecutorial misconduct, calling into question the convictions of nearly 40 defendants (SFGate, “Judge rips Harris’ office for hiding problems,” 05.21.2010).

However, perhaps Harris’ most egregious example of immoral conduct happened in 2014. A federal judge ordered that all non-violent second-strike offenders be eligible for parole in California in an action against constitutional prison crowding. Kamala Harris, then the Attorney General of California, disagreed with the decision. She argued in court that by releasing these inmates early, prisons would lose “an important labor pool” (Los Angeles Times, “Federal judges order California to expand prison releases,” 11.14.2014). Despite pitching herself as a lifelong champion for criminal justice reform, Harris had advocated that the need to keep nonviolent offenders as slaves outweighs their constitutional rights. How would the Democratic Party call itself progressive if members threw their support behind someone with such an atrocious record on civil rights issues?

Even worse, Harris has yet to apologize for her actions and in fact has refused to even acknowledge them (Reason.com, “Kamala Harris Hopes You’ll Forget Her Record as a Drug Warrior and Draconian Prosecutor,” 01.31.2019). At a town hall, she responded to a question calling her out on her past actions by answering “I’ve been consistent my whole career,” and then explained how the record supports her claim that she has been progressive on prison reform (CNN Twitter, “I’ve been consistent my whole career,” 01.28.2019).

I won’t delve into her argument because, in my view, it’s irrelevant. When you actively cover up police misconduct, try to keep a man who you know is innocent in prison and refuse to release nonviolent offenders because you need their involuntary labor, you don’t get to reframe your narrative.

Kamala Harris is not owed an audience. She is not entitled to one simply because she wants to be president. We should not give her the benefit of the doubt, because she refuses to even acknowledge her wrongdoings. We don’t have the right to forgive her; that right belongs to all the people she’s wronged over the course of her long career.

For that reason, I ask you not to vote for Kamala Harris in the primary, no matter how attractive a candidate she is or how well she explains away her inconsistent career. It’s possible that her past really won’t have much of an impact on how she’ll be as president, but why should we wait and see? The best-case scenario is that she’s a progressive who repeatedly violated her own principles so that she could promote her career. In the worst-case scenario, she’s just another corrupt, rotten, regressive prosecutor.

Nolte: Hunter Biden Spent $872K on Hookers, Porn, Sex Clubs over 4 Years

953

Breitbart News

JOHN NOLTE

8 Dec 20231,585

4:10

Federal prosecutors claim that between 2016 and 2019, Hunter Biden spent a breathtaking $872,000 on whores, porn, and sex clubs.

Over those same four years, he withdrew $1.6 million from cash machines.

His expenses for “various women” totaled $683,000.

You know, I really should’ve gotten my “various women” certification when I had the chance.

Hunter spent another $397,000 on “clothing and accessories,” which is pretty impressive considering he never wore them.

This news comes part and parcel with the nine tax-related charges Hunter was hit with Thursday, including three felonies.

Even though he had enough money to squander $872,000 to get laid, Hunter is still charged with “willfully fail[ing] to pay his 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 taxes on time, despite having access to funds to pay some or all of these taxes.”

Hunter faces 17 years in prison, which will never happen.

In 2018, this guy was so hard up for female companionship that he dropped $11,500 for only two nights with some hooker. I wouldn’t pay $11,500 to spend two nights with Rita Hayworth while she was filming Gilda (1946). Don’t get me wrong, I’m not blaming the hooker. If Hunter Biden offered me $11,500 for two nights, I’m not saying I’d take it, but that’s not the kind of money you flippantly walk away from.

You know what Hunter Biden is…?

A slave.

A slave to his depravities.

Hunter Biden is the silver spoon version of the loser sitting in his efficiency apartment glued to internet porn between Home Depot shifts.

What a terrible way to live.

Think of all the good he could have done with that money, all the security he could have ensured for himself and his family, all the people he could’ve helped, all the Blu-rays he could’ve purchased…

And yet, we are told by the corporate media and other elites to sneer at former President Donald Trump’s family, where the children not only adore their parents but have grown into successes in their own right. Yes, of course, they were born on third base. That’s not their fault. But each has forged their own path without scandalizing or embarrassing the family.

Hunter was also born on third base, and instead of sliding into home, he drank 11 beers and ran pants-less through the bleachers singing China’s national anthem.

But how is Hunter supposed to learn when there are never any consequences for his actions? What chance does anyone have being raised by a corrupt liar and racist credibly accused of serial sexual misconduct?

Hunter never had a chance with a father like His Fraudulency.

And let us never forget that Hunter almost got away with all of this because President Joe Biden’s corrupt federal government attempted to slip these alleged felonies into a plea deal that would’ve seen Hunter skate with a wrist slap. It was only due to a no-nonsense judge that corrupt federal prosecutors failed to get away with that.

Meanwhile, this same federal government is attempting to put Joe Biden’s top political challenger in prison for decades over a seemingly endless list of questionable charges, hoping something will stick.

Get a FREE FREE FREE autographed bookplate if you purchase John Nolte’s debut novel, Borrowed Time (Bombardier Books) in December. 

“Though this book cannot fairly be categorized as Christian fiction, it expresses Christian themes as surely as if it were, and more effectively. I marvel at Nolte’s creative imagination and his facility for storytelling.” — David Limbaugh

After your purchase, email JJMNOLTE at HOTMAIL dot COM with your address and any personalization requests. Borrowed Time is winning five-star raves from everyday readers and is the perfect Christmas gift. You can read an excerpt here and an in-depth review here. Also available on Kindle and Audiobook. 

Speaker Mike Johnson: 6 Points of Evidence Support Joe Biden Impeachment Inquiry Vote

Drew Angerer/Getty Images

WENDELL HUSEBØ

12 Dec 2023474

3:12

The House will vote on formally opening an impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden on Wednesday to enable the enforcement of subpoenas and empower the gathering of evidence about whether the president is compromised and “traded official acts for foreign dollars,” House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) wrote in a Tuesday USA Today op-ed.

Johnson’s op-ed sets the stage for the full House vote after the White House refused to comply with House investigators’ request for relevant documentation and records. The vote will be a test for House Republicans, who hold a slight majority over House Democrats. The measure will need nearly all Republican support.

• Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) opened an “impeachment inquiry” on September 12, but lawmakers did not vote to approve the measure.
• If the impeachment inquiry receives majority support on the House floor, the inquiry will be formally adopted, a status that Johnson says will help the House’s inquiry obtain information blocked by the White House.

Johnson, a constitutional lawyer and former member of the House Judiciary Committee, cited six cases of mounting evidence against Joe Biden that “cannot be ignored”:

1. Biden family members and Biden business-linked entities received more than $15 million from individuals in Ukraine, Russia, Kazakhstan, Romania, and China.
2. Joe Biden spoke with Hunter Biden’s business associates at least 22 times.
3. Joe Biden lied about his involvement in the business.
4. Joe Biden received “direct monthly payments” from Hunter Biden’s “Owasco PC” business account, which received “payments from Chinese-state linked companies and other foreign nationals and companies.”
5. Investigators flagged the Justice Department’s “deviations” in the five-year investigation into Hunter Biden.
6. An FBI FD-1023 form alleges Joe Biden accepted a $5 million bribe while vice president.

“The House will likely need to go to court to enforce its subpoenas, and opening a formal inquiry – backed by a vote of the full body – puts us in the strongest legal position to gather the evidence and provide transparency to the American people,” Johnson wrote:

The American people have a right to know whether the president − through his family − traded official acts for foreign dollars, whether the president is compromised and whether Joe Biden abused his power as president to impede or obstruct the investigation into Hunter Biden. As we have done all along, House Republicans will continue to follow the facts where they lead.

House investigators opened a probe into the Biden family in November 2022. They revealed Joe Biden received money from James and Hunter Biden. They also showed that nine additional Biden family members received payments from the family’s foreign business ventures, including two of Joe Biden’s grandchildren.

More evidence against Joe Biden can be found here.

Follow Wendell Husebø on “X” @WendellHusebø. He is the author of Politics of Slave Morality

THE FACT THAT JOE, HUNTER, JAMES AND FRANK ARE NOT IN PRISON SHOWS YOU HOW CORRUPT AMERICA'S RULING CLASS OF PARASITE GAMER LAWYERS IS!

  VIDEO

CUT AND PASTE YOUTUBE LINK

Watters: I guarantee you Satan went to law school

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6Ln2aXLqWw

THE BIDEN KLEPTOCRACY

American people deserve to know what China was up to with Joe Biden, especially when Beijing had already shelled out millions of dollars to Biden family members — including millions in set-asides for “the big guy.” What else is on that infamous Hunter Biden laptop? The conflicted Biden Justice Department cannot be trusted to engage in any meaningful oversight on this issue. We need a special counsel now.   

                               TOM FITTON - JUDICIAL WATCH

MOST CORRUPT VII: Joe Biden - Part II - Forgotten History

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35SD91ywghw

Video: Comer Reveals MONTHLY Payments From Hunter’s Firm Directly to Joe Biden

More Biden family lies and schemes exposed.

December 11, 2023 by Frontpagemag.com 2 Comments

Newsletter

Joe Biden has stated there was a “wall” between his official duties as president and his family’s “influence peddling schemes”.  James Comer has now released subpoenaed bank records that show Hunter Biden’s business entity, Owasco PC, made “direct monthly payments to Joe Biden.” 

Don’t miss it!

Reader Interactions