More evidence that blacks are maddest of all about Biden's open borders
As the press and its political allies dismiss opposition to open borders and its inherent 'replacement theory' as little more than 'white supremacy,' something different is happening out in America's inner cities.
Charlamagne Tha God (the name he goes by) hosts the nation's top radio program with black audiences, and far from hearing white supremacy talk regarding the border issue, is hearing black voices that have had it up to here with open borders.
According to Fox Digital:
During an interview with Fox News Digital, Charlamagne was asked whether he viewed the issue of immigration as a major factor ahead of November. He said he constantly hears from listeners complaining about the influx of migrants rocking their communities, something he didn't hear much about until this past year.
"I have the privilege of doing morning radio and speaking to working-class people every single day," Charlamagne told Fox News Digital. "I have the privilege of being involved in my community, from New York to New Jersey to South Carolina, where I get to look people in the eyes and have real conversations with them. And, you know, people are really concerned about this issue."
"Like, I honestly have never spoken to as many people who are concerned about the migrant issue as I have, you know, over the past year. And, I mean, I've heard everything from, you know, the gang MS13 overrunning neighborhoods . . . what we saw just happened in New York City, where the migrants—they took 2,000 migrants and put them in the school and made the school stay home—made the students stay home and do school via Zoom. And that was a big issue. Like, I mean, people were calling the radio station—that was just this week, you know, really, really, really complaining about that. So I've never seen working-class people who I interact with every day until this past year really, really, really expressed their frustration for the migrants," he continued.
And this, regarding the standing narrative that only Republicans oppose illegal immigration and it was for racist reasons. The radio host referred to the "stunt" of border state governors transferring illegal migrants to sanctuary cities as their mayors and governors screamed, which, he noted, was an "effective" tactic:
"Clearly it was effective because it made a lot of those Democrats start singing a different tune. And, I mean, the voters see that. The voters see that," Charlamagne said. "So what does that look like to the voter? Just on the surface, just on the surface, it looks like Republicans were right about the issue and Democrats got it wrong. And now a lot of Democrats are starting to sound like the Republicans sounded. So it makes a lot of people say, ‘Well, damn, Republicans were actually right on that issue.’ Just on the surface, just plain on the surface, that's how it looks, you know, to the average voter."
In doing this, he pointed out that black people aren't fooled by the leftist narrative that only whites oppose open borders.
The hard reality is that migrants with little education and few skills are most likely to move into neighborhoods of the poorest people, who are black, and bring crime and gangs with them. They also displace black citizens from jobs, by being willing to work for less, making the lot of black people that much harder. The black people see this from the sharp end much more so than the Martha's Vineyard crowd, and as Charlamagne reports, they want something done about it.
The radio host is hearing from black people -- and so is the black mayor of Chicago, because black residents there have demanded that he stop putting black residents last as every move is made to accommodate illegal border crossers while local people go without resources.
The mainstream press, though, doesn't. It likes the same dreary tropes about white supremacy being the motive behind opposition to open borders. In doing this, they're ignoring the voices and views of black people in a way that Charlamagne The God cannot. How's that for some racism from white news organizations -- ignoring black people as if they don't matter because they don't fill the narrative. Any questions as to why growing numbers of black voters are now moving towards Donald Trump?
Image: Twitter screen shot
Leftists emulating Nazis: Rivals, lunatics, and Klansmen
Since the authoritarian left keeps on violating its own little “rules” on ever mentioning the Nazis or Hitler while it projects on the issue all the time, we of the pro-freedom community must defend ourselves, correct the record, and continue to document the growing list of ways the Democrat party emulates the Nazi Party. The similarities between the Democratic National Committee and the National Socialist German Workers’ Party began 100 years ago in the 1910s and ’20s. Leftists have always been in rivalries with one another in how they can enslave the rest of humanity, while they pretend to foster “‘equality,” or their new BS buzzword, “equity.”
Rivals: Leftist conflicts over ideological minutia no one else cares about.
These rivalries are one of the first and foremost similarities between leftists and Nazis. Authoritarian collectivists have always exploited this fact as “proof” that somehow, some way, certain leftist factions are “far-right” when it proves the exact opposite. This rivalry issue was made clear in the academic paper “How and Why Fascism and Nazism Became the ‘Right.’”
[T]he convention of affiliating fascism and National Socialism with the right wing originated during the acute ideological war between Marxist and non-Marxist currents of socialism in the first half of the twentieth century. That war had several hot outbreaks where Fascists and Nazis eliminated evolutionary socialists and communists in their corresponding countries and abroad, whereas Bolsheviks did the same to other fellow socialists.
It’s important to understand that communism, socialism, Marxism, and fascism are all collectivist ideologies born of ancient concepts. Plato’s Republic from ancient Greece is one source of these discussions. Even leftists admit that the first “genuinely socialist position” was the book Utopia, published over 500 years ago, or more than three centuries before Marx showed up. Even the first documented use of the term “socialism” was in November of 1827, while Karl was still in training lederhosen.
Socialism isn’t the exactly the same as Marxism, and there is a rivalry between these collectivist ideologies, as exemplified by this quote from Adolf Hitler in the book Hitler and I, by Otto Strasser:
I am a socialist, and a very different kind of socialist from your rich friend Reventlow. I was once an ordinary working-man. I would not allow my chauffeur to eat worse than I eat myself. But your kind of socialism is nothing but Marxism.
These leftist ideological rivalries were widespread at the time, with reports from all over the world of “right-wing” and “left-wing” socialists due to ideological differences in collectivist parties. The New York Times reported on June 26, 1918 that the “French Socialist Party Is Split; Thomas Heads New Wing ‘Socialists of the Right.’” Then the “Newspaper of Record” reported on factions of a socialist party in NYC naming “Two Tickets Right and Left Wing” as a “serious split” in the party. Then, on September 2, 1919, the New York Times reported that “Left Wing Socialists Widen the Breach with the Right-Wing or Conservative Faction” at the National Socialist Party in Chicago, splitting the socialist congress, reporting a day later that the left-wing faction of the National Socialist Party withdrew from the parent body.
The New York Times then reported on March 2, 1920 that French Socialists spurn Bolshevism, relating that the National Socialist Congress voted against the adoption of Lenin’s program. A story in the New York Times on October 4, 1920, that in Italy the “Lenin Faction Wins Italian Socialism; Big Split Now Inevitable,” reported that, like other socialist parties around the world, it had a right wing, known as the Reformists and a left wing, known as the official Socialists, said to be their Maximalists and revolutionists. The Nazis also had these rivalries, with a report in the New York Times on November 28, 1925 of a Hitlerite riot in Berlin:
The National socialist-Labor Party, of which Adolf Hitler is patron and father, persists in believing Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted in a party meeting.
On the speaker’s assertion that Lain was the greatest man, second only to Hitler, and that the difference between communism ‘ and the Hitler faith was very slight, a faction war opened with whizzing beer glasses.
Another New York Times report confirms that the Bolsheviks persecuted and locked up their collectivist political rivals: “Socialists Fill Soviet Jails.” And there are plenty of other examples of rifts in the far-left ecosphere — here, here, here, and here.
All this proves that the Nazis were just like their fellow authoritarian leftists in persecuting their ideological rivals, as with the very first report in the New York Times on Herr Hitler, 100 years ago, that claimed they were “reactionary” (right-wing), supposedly because of this rivalry. We’ve proven this is the opposite and that this is the origin of the left’s biggest lie.
Lunatics: The constant in the universe that the Nazis and leftists have lost the plot.
It goes without saying that the far left has lost the plot, so it’s no surprise that Nazis were the same. But even in their early days, many noticed that they weren’t quite mentally stable — long before they plunged the world into another war and tried to erase whole groups of people from the planet.
All of this started with the first report on the Nazis in the Los Angeles Times, dated November 18, 1922, that also brought up ideological rivalry issues. This referred to talk of a coup, along with other reports in the New York Times of a Secret Reactionary Mobilization.
This build-up continued with reports in the New York Times and resulted in what was later called a “Comic Opera.” At the time, the New York Times headlines blared “Bavaria in revolt” and “Monarchist Forces Reported Marching on Berlin,” and a proclamation was issued referring to this being brought on by crazed persons, with it being a crazy mutiny.
Later on, the whole fiasco was termed a Bavarian Opera Bouffe, with the word that the proclamation of President Ebert was pretty close to calling the “revolution in Bavaria as the work of lunatics.”
With a story in the New York Times making that clear — “Beer Hall Scene Gave Comic Opera Touch to Hitler ‘Coup’; ‘Stay Here and Drink Beer’” — doesn’t this sound like the sheer insanity of the left?
Klansman: A first report on the Nazis ties them to the terrorist arm of the Democrat party.
On November 12, 1922, the Chicago Sunday Tribune had one of the first reports on the Nazis in the States, and while the paper got a few things wrong, such as the spelling of the name of the “Swashbuckling Little Politician” and the proper dye of Herr Hittler’s (sic) manure-colored mob, the article stated:
The Bavarian Grayshirts corresponding to the Italian Fascisti, and somewhat similar to the American Ku Klux Klan, are a third element in Bavaria’s Unrest.
This isn’t a surprise, considering that the KKK was an organization formed by Southern Democrats to keep African-Americans and Republicans out of political power. Even if we pretend the ridiculous “party switch” mythology is somehow, some way valid for the sake of argument, this was long after the rise of the Nazis. So how do leftists explain this contradiction?
That is why leftist lies always fall apart. And if they’re lying about all of this, what else are they lying about?
D Parker is an engineer, inventor, wordsmith, and student of history, the director of communications for a civil rights organization, and a long-time contributor to conservative websites. Find him on Substack.
Image: paul_houle via Flickr, CC BY-SA 2.0.
