Saturday, October 2, 2021

JOE BIDEN'S LITTLE SHIT MARK ZUCKERBERG - Report: Instagram Continues to Promote Eating Disorders and Diet Pills to Teens

 

Report: Instagram Continues to Promote Eating Disorders and Diet Pills to Teens

Mark Zuckerberg swallows a giggle. Drew Angerer /Getty
Drew Angerer /Getty
3:15

According to a recent report from VICE News, despite recent backlash over the effect of Instagram on the mental health of teen users, the Facebook-owned platform continues to promote eating disorders and diet pills to its users.

VICE News reports that as Facebook faces increased scrutiny following the release of a number of internal documents showing that the company is aware its products can have a negative effect on the mental health of younger users, new research shows that the company is continuing to promote products and content that could be damaging to the mental health of teens.

Sad teen with a phone in her bedroom - stock photo Single sad teen holding a mobile phone lamenting sitting on the bed in her bedroom with a dark light in the background

Sad teen with a phone in her bedroom – stock photo (Getty Images)

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg arrives for the 8th annual Breakthrough Prize awards ceremony at NASA Ames Research Center in Mountain View, California on November 3, 2019. (Photo by JOSH EDELSON / AFP) (Photo by JOSH EDELSON/AFP via Getty Images)

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg arrives for the 8th annual Breakthrough Prize awards ceremony at NASA Ames Research Center in Mountain View, California on November 3, 2019. (Photo by JOSH EDELSON / AFP)

In a report titled “Facebook Knows Instagram Is Toxic for Teen Girls, Company Documents Show,” the WSJ claimed that Facebook was aware that its photo-sharing app Instagram can have a negative effect on the body image of young women.

The WSJ wrote:

“Thirty-two percent of teen girls said that when they felt bad about their bodies, Instagram made them feel worse,” the researchers said in a March 2020 slide presentation posted to Facebook’s internal message board, reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. “Comparisons on Instagram can change how young women view and describe themselves.”

“We make body image issues worse for one in three teen girls,” said one slide from 2019, summarizing research about teen girls who experience the issues.

“Teens blame Instagram for increases in the rate of anxiety and depression,” said another slide. “This reaction was unprompted and consistent across all groups.”

Now new research by the activist group SumOfUs appears to show that Instagram still displays posts promoting eating disorders, diet pills, and skin whitening products to teenagers. Instagram has banned some hashtags relating to eating disorders but researchers found that users can get around these restrictions by using creative hashtags that have racked up over tens of millions of posts.

Researchers examined 240 sample posts linked to eating disorder hashtags and discovered that over half of them promoted eating disorders while 90 percent of them promoted unproven appetite suppressants. The report authors wrote: “The posts demonstrate how Instagram enables and encourages users to engage in negative talk, self-harm, and extreme dieting.”


“This research confirms that, despite Facebook’s promises to curb such content, Instagram remains flooded with toxic content that poses an immediate danger to the lives of its users, and particularly to teenagers and young people,” the report’s authors wrote.

“The platform tracks and targets some of the most vulnerable in society—young teens and people of color—with content that heavily promotes unrealistic and unattainable Western beauty standards, and offers false solutions like plastic surgery, skin whitening, and extreme dieting to trigger body image issues and lower self-esteem.”

Read more at VICE News here.

Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship. Follow him on Twitter @LucasNolan or contact via secure email at the address lucasnolan@protonmail.com

BLOG BEST READS

SHE CONQUERED HERSELF AND THEN CONQUERED HER TIMES TO BECOME ONE OF AMERICA'S GREATEST DAUGHTERS.

CLICK ON IMAGE TO READ SAMPLE PAGES ON AMAZON EBOOK IMAGE

          

READ PAGES

 JUST CLICK ON EBOOK IMAGE ON AMAZON



Big Tech and Big Law dominate Biden transition teams, tempering progressive hopes

https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2020/12/how-many-parasite-lawyers-will-lawyer.html

"Along with Obama (LAWYER) Biden (LAWYER), Pelosi and Schumer (LAWYER) are responsible for incalculable damage done to this country over the eight years of that administration."       PATRICIA McCARTHY 

Add the Banksters’ rent boy Eric Holder (LAWYER) and the up and coming Swamp Empress Kamala Harris (LAWYER, SO IS HER SHADY HUSBAND)…but keep counting….(LAWYER) Brian Deese, Obama-Biden’s loot-for-Wall Street guy.

Hauser also didn’t like the prevalence of Big Law talent on the Department of Justice team, which signaled to him that the Biden administration could go soft on corporate malefactors. 

///

BIDEN’S WALL STREET CABINET: EXPECT BOTTOMLESS BAILOUTS NEXT!

Biden administration will be committed to austerity and back-to-work campaign aimed at forcing workers to pay for the corporate bailout no matter how many lives are needlessly lost to the pandemic.

https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2020/12/joe-bidens-wall-street-cabinet-biden.html

The selection of Deese and Adeyemo—who both previously served in the Obama administration—exemplifies the revolving door between Wall Street and Washington, DC, which operates constantly, regardless of which party controls the White House.

Big Tech Succeeds Due to Innovation, Imagination, and Lots of Taxpayer Handouts

 By Drew Johnson | October 1, 2021 | 5:17pm EDT

 
 
Elon Musk, founder of SpaceX, speaks during the Satellite 2020 at the Washington Convention CenterMarch 9, 2020, in Washington, D.C. (Photo credit: BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)
Elon Musk, founder of SpaceX, speaks during the Satellite 2020 at the Washington Convention CenterMarch 9, 2020, in Washington, D.C. (Photo credit: BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)

Renowned inventors and entrepreneurs such as Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, Walt Disney, and others were part of the tradition of American free-market revolutionaries who relied on independent determination, rather than taxpayer handouts, to overcome obstacles.

Oh, how times have changed.

Our American way of life has certainly – albeit incrementally and often quietly – crept toward socialism. The COVID-19 government handouts have catapulted us even further in that direction. Many Americans are losing sight of what it really means to be self-made and self-sufficient.

A generation of Americans are now being raised to believe that, when times are tough, Uncle Sam will be there to bail them out. Unfortunately, this includes some of today’s most notable entrepreneurs – particularly in the tech industry.

Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, and many other modern billionaires achieved much of their success by reaching into the pockets of American taxpayers.

In September, Musk’s new SpaceX project was applauded in some circles for launching the first space flight without government funding. That’s really stretching the truth. SpaceX wouldn’t even exist if not for billions of taxpayers’ dollars.

According to a 2019 report by The Verge, “During its first decade of operation, SpaceX operated off of $1 billion, and about half of that money came from government contracts from NASA.” “Musk,” the article pointed out, “notably thanked NASA for the agency’s support after SpaceX launched its very first Dragon cargo capsule to the International Space Station in 2012.”

A 2015 Los Angeles Times investigation found that Musk’s companies – Tesla, SolarCity and SpaceX – all benefited from a total of “$4.9 billion in government support.” CNBC reported at the end of 2020 that SpaceX’s Starlink won nearly $900 million in Federal Communications Commission subsidies to bring Internet service to rural areas. And, although Musk's the world’s second richest man, Tesla received COVID-19 corporate bailout money, even as he tweeted against aid for individuals.

Musk is hardly alone. Other Big Tech leaders have long relied on taxpayer largesse to fuel their success.

In 2019, the Mises Institute compiled a list of government handouts and tax breaks pocketed by Big Tech companies. The authors found Amazon received $3.5 billion, Google devoured $766 million, and Apple snagged $693 million. Even Facebook managed to grab $333 million from taxpayers. Those amounts have doubtlessly skyrocketed in the years since.

In addition to enjoying handouts and tax breaks at the expense of the American taxpayer, tech giants have learned that success isn’t always dependent on being the best or the brightest. It can also come as the result of mastering the art of manipulating the government. Carefully spent lobbying dollars and well-placed friends in Congress have allowed some tech companies to operate as virtual monopolies in some cases and avoid paying for pilfering other companies’ copyrights in others.

The former instance was exhibited during testimony before Congress last year when the leaders of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google faced questions from Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI), who chaired the House Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law.

When Cicilline asked about anti-competitive practices, The Atlantic wrote, he “reduced Google’s Sundar Pichai to mumbling incoherently about kettlebells; using specific examples, the subcommittee members Pramila Jayapal and Joe Neguse prodded Amazon’s Jeff Bezos into admitting instances of his company’s anticompetitive behavior.”

Yet, even with such admissions, no meaningful action has been taken to rein in Big Tech. Why? Fear apparently plays a big part. Bureaucrats and lawmakers certainly took notice when an executive branch appointee got in the way of Google’s attempt to sidestep copyright protections.

The search engine giant was reportedly behind the Obama Administration’s firing of Registrar of Copyrights Maria Pallante last October. It was the first time the Registrar had been dismissed in 119 years. Pallante apparently opposed Google’s efforts to weaken copyright laws responsible for protecting authors, artists, and musicians.

When Henry Ford started out, one of his first companies was one of around 60 up-and-coming automakers in America. It struggled to keep pace with competitors.

After two failed attempts, his third company, The Ford Motor Company, found success while most competitors fell by the wayside. Ford first produced the Model A, and then the famous Model T. Rather than depending on taxpayer bailouts or the use of nefarious means to eliminate government oversight, Ford simply worked hard to make better cars.

Let’s set the record straight: Musk, Zuckerberg, and Bezos don’t belong in the same breath as Ford and other self-made entrepreneurs. These Big Tech tycoons may be rich and famous, but unlike many of the moguls from previous generations, they’ve gained much of their wealth and success by manipulating government officials and ripping off American taxpayers.

Drew Johnson is a government watchdog columnist and technology policy analyst who serves as a senior fellow at the National Center for Public Policy Research.


Big Tech Succeeds Due to Innovation, Imagination, and Lots of Taxpayer Handouts



These tech companies are calling the tune, and Joe Biden is going to do whatever they tell him to.”

 

 

 

Hawley: ‘Big Tech Is Going to Run’ Biden Administration

 

IAN HANCHETT

15 Dec 2020696

1:10

On Tuesday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “The Story,” Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) stated that “big tech is going to run this administration,” and “tech companies are calling the tune, and Joe Biden is going to do whatever they tell him to.”

Hawley said, “We saw…these companies shoveling money at Joe Biden and Kamala Harris back during the campaign. Now you look at this Facebook executive is running the Biden transition, you look at big tech executives ending up in key positions all over the place, and make no mistake about it, Martha, if Joe Biden is sworn in as president in January, big tech is going to run this administration, just like they did in the Obama-Biden administration. Let’s not forget, Google was on the line for an antitrust lawsuit back during the Obama administration, and the Obama team shut it down after Google met with them, where else, in the White House. These tech companies are calling the tune, and Joe Biden is going to do whatever they tell him to.”

 

Big Tech and Big Law dominate Biden transition teams, tempering progressive hopes

https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2020/12/how-many-parasite-lawyers-will-lawyer.html

"Along with Obama (LAWYER) Biden (LAWYER), Pelosi and Schumer (LAWYER) are responsible for incalculable damage done to this country over the eight years of that administration."       PATRICIA McCARTHY 

Add the Banksters’ rent boy Eric Holder (LAWYER) and the up and coming Swamp Empress Kamala Harris (LAWYER, SO IS HER SHADY HUSBAND)…but keep counting….(LAWYER) Brian Deese, Obama-Biden’s loot-for-Wall Street guy.

Hauser also didn’t like the prevalence of Big Law talent on the Department of Justice team, which signaled to him that the Biden administration could go soft on corporate malefactors. 

///

BIDEN’S WALL STREET CABINET: EXPECT BOTTOMLESS BAILOUTS NEXT!

Biden administration will be committed to austerity and back-to-work campaign aimed at forcing workers to pay for the corporate bailout no matter how many lives are needlessly lost to the pandemic.

https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2020/12/joe-bidens-wall-street-cabinet-biden.html

The selection of Deese and Adeyemo—who both previously served in the Obama administration—exemplifies the revolving door between Wall Street and Washington, DC, which operates constantly, regardless of which party controls the White House.

It is a further signal to the financial oligarchy that a Biden administration will dispense with its rhetoric about raising taxes on the wealthy and continue funneling trillions into the stock markets. “By picking folks with deep ties to large asset managers,” Tyler Gellasch, executive director of investor trade group Healthy Markets Association, told the Journal, “the administration can help assuage financial executives’ concerns. It sends a clear signal to the industry to breathe easier: They can plan for stability without likely facing massive new regulatory or tax risks.”

No comments: