Thursday, March 24, 2022

JOE BIDEN BEGS - PLEASE DON'T IMPEACH AND TRY ME FOR BRIBES SUCKING JUST BECAUSE I DESTROYED AMERICA'S BORDERS AND ECONOMY - WE CAN'T STILL PRINT MONEY IN THE WHITE HOUSE BASEMENT!

  Joe Biden didn’t do anything wrong? A time-honored method of taking bribes is having them paid to a family member, usually in exchange for nominal or nonexistent services. It is comical to watch “reporters” pretend not to understand this. MONICA SHOWALTER


Democrats Propose Cash, Rebates to Counter Biden’s Soaring Gas Prices 

The gasoline price board is shown at a gas station in Menlo Park, Calif., on March 21, 2022. On Wednesday, March 23, 2022, Californians who own cars could get up to $800 from the state to help offset record high gas prices under a proposal announced Wednesday, March 23, 2022, …
AP Photo/Jeff Chiu, Thomas COEX/AFP
3:53

Democrats are proposing to offer drivers cash and rebate schemes to counter President Biden’s record-high gas prices.

Reps. Mike Thompson (D-CA), John Larson (D-CT), and Lauren Underwood (D-IL) last week proposed the Gas Rebate Act of 2022 where American drivers would receive a $100 energy rebate per month for the remainder of 2022.

The rebate would only be awarded if the national average gas price exceeds $4.00 per gallon. The national average price of gas on Thursday was $4.23, according to AAA.

Additional constraints would apply to “those who earn less than $75,000 and $100 for joint tax filers who earn less than $150,000,” CBS WCSC reported.

House Homeland Security Committee member Rep. Lauren Underwood, D-Ill., looks to Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Kevin McAleenan as he testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, May 22, 2019, during the House Homeland Security Committee on budget. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

Rep. Lauren Underwood (D-IL) on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, May 22, 2019. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

Upon introducing the bill, Thompson blamed the high gas prices on Russian President Vladimir Putin instead of Biden’s war on American energy independence. Increasing about a dollar throughout Biden’s first year, gas prices have risen about an additional 70 cents since the invasion began.

Rep. Mike Thompson, D-Calif., speaks on the House floor as the House of Representatives debates the articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump at the Capitol in Washington, Wednesday, Dec. 18, 2019. (House Television via AP)

Rep. Mike Thompson, D-Calif., speaks on the House floor as the House of Representatives debates the articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump at the Capitol in Washington, Wednesday, Dec. 18, 2019. (House Television via AP)

“Americans are feeling the impact at the pump of Vladimir Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine, and right now we must work together on commonsense policy solutions to ease the financial burden that my constituents are feeling,” Thompson claimed.

Rep. John Larson, D-Conn., speaks during a news conference, Wednesday, March 18, 2015, on Capitol Hill in Washington. Larson will face Republican Mary Fay for Connecticut's 1st Congressional District in the 2020 elections. (AP Photo/Molly Riley, File)

Rep. John Larson (D-CT) speaks during a news conference, Wednesday, March 18, 2015, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Molly Riley)

Thompson is not the only Democrat trying to reduce the price of gas heading into the midterms. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) has proposed to counter Biden’s high gas prices by giving cash to drivers, according to the Wall Street Journal. “Mr. Newsom’s $11 billion relief package, unveiled Wednesday, includes $400 direct payments to Californians per vehicle they own, capped at two vehicles. The proposal doesn’t have an income cap.”

The Associated Press

California Gov. Gavin Newsom delivers his annual State of the State address in Sacramento, Calif., Tuesday, March 8, 2022. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli)

Back on the east coast, Governor of Main, Janet Mills (D), has proposed a budget gimmick that she says would hand out $850 in relief checks due to Biden’s 40-year-high inflation.

“Inflation and increased oil and gas prices resulting from Putin’s invasion of Ukraine are hitting Maine people hard,” Mills claimed, not mentioning the roughly $1.00 increase in the price of gas cost before the invasion. “This proposal will help Maine people grapple with these increased costs by putting money directly back into their pockets.”

Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR) has taken a different tact. He has proposed a tax increase on the oil industry, which would be given to Americans in the form of a tax rebate. The name of his legislation is the Stop Gas Price Gouging Tax and Rebate Act.

“It’s no time for profiteering or price-gouging,” DeFazio claimed. “This is why I’ve introduced the Stop Gas Price Gouging Tax and Rebate Act. My legislation would tax big oil’s excess profits in 2022 and return the revenue back to Americans.”

DeFazio blaming the oil companies for Biden’s high gas price comes as the industry is struggling with red tape that Biden has imposed. Specifically, Biden has made it increasingly more difficult for oil companies to gain financing to drill on private lands. Biden has also halted new drilling on public lands. Moreover, Biden has terminated the Keystone pipeline project that would have transported vast amounts of oil to American refiners.

Overall, Democrats have refused to take responsibility for the high gas prices, which has fueled inflation. For instance, what was once called “transitory” inflation is now “Putin’s price hike.” Before that shift, CNN labeled inflation “good,” which the Washington Post quickly reframed as “corporate greed.”

Follow Wendell Husebø on Twitter and Gettr @WendellHusebø

LAWYER JOE BIDEN, LAWYER HUNTER BIDEN, LAWYER JAMES BIDEN.... REMINDERS OF THE DANGERS OF LETTING PARASITIC LYING GAMER LAWYERS RUN THE COUNTRY.

ALL THESE CRIMES OCCURRED WHEN BIDEN WAS V.P. SERVING THE BANKSTER REGIME OF LAWYER BARACK OBAMA.

Bidens' money trail to Russia, China, and Ukraine exposed





Big Tech 'colluded with Democrats to censor' the Hunter Biden laptop story





US media acted ‘disgracefully’ by denying Hunter Biden laptop story







McCarthy: Inflation Continues to Get Worse Because of Democrat Policy

1:38

On Wednesday, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) reacted to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell saying inflation was going on in the United States prior to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression toward Ukraine.

McCarthy, on Fox News Channel’s “The Faulkner Focus,” argued inflation “continues to get worse because of the Democratic policy” in which “they attacked” energy independence.

“It continues to get worse because of the Democratic policy. You had the Fed chair just now admit it is not about Putin. It started when the Democrats had one-party rule in Washington,” McCarthy emphasized. “The first thing they did was spend $2 trillion. They … had the government pay people not to work, raising the price of what it costs for small businesses to survive. Then you watched their action about crime and others building within the streets. You watched what they did when we were energy independent. They attacked. You know, the strength of the country is not just your military — it is whether you have an economy that’s strong. And going after energy actually made us weaker in the process around the world but added to inflation because the thing people don’t quite understand — oil doesn’t just go into your car. It goes into your clothing, into the purchasing of your phone, it goes into the print on a box. So, it raises the prices on everyone.”

“It is every single day the price goes up while these Democrats are in power,” he concluded.

Follow Trent Baker on Twitter @MagnifiTrent

Poll: Overwhelming Majority Support Suspending Federal, State Gas Tax

MILL VALLEY, CA - MARCH 03: A customer pumps gasoline into his car at an Arco gas station on March 3, 2015 in Mill Valley, California. U.S. gas prices have surged an average of 39 cents in the past 35 days as a result of the price of crude oil …
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
3:09

An overwhelming majority of voters in the United States support a temporary break from paying federal and state taxes on gasoline as one method of reducing the skyrocketing price of gas, according to a Morning Consult/Politico poll.

Seventy-three percent of registered voters in the United States support allowing a temporary break on having to pay federal gas tax when pumping gas as one method of reducing gas prices. Of those respondents, 44 percent of the respondents strongly support this method.

Only 14 percent oppose having a temporary break from paying the federal gas tax. While an overwhelming majority support a break, only 13 percent have no opinion.

When asked about a temporary break from paying state taxes when at the pump as another way to reduce the price of gas, 72 percent support this method. Of those respondents, 42 percent strongly support it.

Only 15 percent oppose having a temporary break from paying the state tax on gas. Again, while an overwhelming majority support such a break, only 13 percent have no opinion.

While not as high a percentage, a majority of the respondents also said they support the federal government releasing some of the oil from the country’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR). Sixty-four percent said they support this, while 33 percent of those respondents strongly support this method to reduce the cost.

There is slightly higher opposition to this method than the others. Nineteen percent oppose it, while 18 percent have no opinion.

As oil and gas prices have skyrocketed over the last year under President Joe Biden’s leadership, oil companies have had many problems domestically as the administration has taken aim at American energy independence. As the Biden administration pushes for a world that doesn’t use oil, it makes oil investment scarcer and the country more reliant on foreign oil.

This is due to the Biden administration canceling the Keystone XL Pipeline, suspending oil and gas leasing on public lands and waters, halting federal support for oil and gas projects overseas, and suspending oil drilling leases in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).

In fact, though Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm once said the administration would not impose a ban on crude oil exports, Biden waived the sanctions on Russia’s Nord Stream 2 pipeline, a move that would reduce American energy exports. The Ukrainians have even claimed that lifting the sanctions on Nord Stream 2 is one of the reasons the Russians invaded their country.

This is all while Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg suggested that Americans struggling with high gas prices switch to electric vehicles to save money.

The recent poll from Morning Consult/Politico was conducted from March 18 to 20, with the participation of 2,005 registered voters. The margin of error was plus or minus two percent.

Jacob Bliss is a reporter for Breitbart News. You can follow him on Twitter.

Poll: Majority Support the Federal Government Opening Up Public Lands for Oil Drilling

In this Jan. 16, 2015, file photo, a person walks past pump jacks operating at the Kern River Oil Field in Bakersfield, Calif. California's oil rich Kern County is voting on a revised plan that could permit tens of thousands of oil and gas wells in the next two decades. …
Jae C. Hong, File/AP
2:32

A majority of voters in the United States support the federal government opening up public lands for oil drilling as one method of reducing the skyrocketing price of gas, according to a Morning Consult/Politico poll.

Fifty-six percent of the respondents said they support the federal government opening up public lands for oil drilling to hopefully reduce the price of gas. Of those respondents, 32 percent of the respondents strongly support this move.

Only 30 percent oppose the federal government opening up public lands for oil drilling as a way to reduce the price of gas, and 14 percent have no opinion on the topic.

Oil and gas prices have skyrocketed over the last year under President Joe Biden’s leadership, and oil companies have had many problems domestically as the administration has taken aim at American energy independence. As the Biden administration pushes a world that doesn’t use oil, it makes oil investment scarcer and the country more reliant on foreign oil.

This is due to the Biden administration canceling the Keystone XL Pipeline, suspending oil and gas leasing on public lands and waters, halting federal support for oil and gas projects overseas, and suspending oil drilling leases in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).

In fact, the Biden administration has tried to blame everyone but themselves, such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, and has even coined the term “Putin’s price hikes.”

The poll also found that a majority (64 percent) of the respondents said they support the federal government releasing some of the oil from the country’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), compared to the 19 percent who oppose it.

But an overwhelming majority of respondents support a temporary break from paying federal and state gas tax as a method of reducing the skyrocketing prices. Seventy-three percent support allowing a temporary break from having to pay the federal gas tax, while only 14 percent oppose it. And 72 percent support a temporary break in the state gas tax, while only 15 percent oppose.

The recent poll from Morning Consult/Politico was conducted from March 18 to 20 and surveyed 2,005 registered voters. The margin of error was plus or minus two percent.

Jacob Bliss is a reporter for Breitbart News. You can follow him on Twitter.

Two-Thirds of Voters Say Hunter Biden’s Laptop Scandal Is Important News

 By Craig Bannister | March 24, 2022 | 2:55pm EDT

  
Pres. Joe Biden (R) and son Hunter
(Getty Images/Teresa Kroeger)

The closer U.S. voters follow the news of First Son Hunter Biden’s laptop scandal, the more likely they are to believe it’s an important story that President Joe Biden knew about and may have profited from – and that it would’ve costed him the 2020 election if media had covered it fully, a new Rasmussen survey reveals.

According to the survey of 1,000 U.S. likely voters, conducted March 21-22, two-thirds (66%) called the story either very important (48%) or somewhat important (18%) – in light of the The New Times’ verification of the authenticity of the Biden laptop – when asked the following question:

“The New York Times has recently admitted that emails about Hunter Biden’s business dealings in foreign countries found on a laptop computer the president’s son abandoned in a Delaware computer repair shop were authentic. How important is the story about Hunter Biden’s laptop?”

The closer voters follow the Hunter Biden news, the more likely they are to consider the Biden laptop story at least somewhat important, with the percentage rising steadily from just 26% of those who follow the news “not at all” to 86% of those who follow it “very closely.” Fully, 82% of those who follow very closely rate the story a “very important” one.

Likewise, the closer voters follow the Hunter Biden news, the more prone they are to believe it’s likely that President Joe Biden “was consulted about and perhaps profited from his son Hunter's overseas business deals including at least one involving a company in mainland China.”

Again, while two-thirds (65%) of voters say it’s at least somewhat likely Joe Biden had been consulted and may have profited, that percentage rises from 32% of the least informed voters to 85% of those who have followed Hunter Biden news most closely. Among those who’ve followed very closely, 81% say it’s “very likely” that Joe Biden was consulted and may have profited from the deals.

Media bias-by-omission may have swung the 2020 presidential election in Joe Biden’s favor, the survey results suggest, based on the following question:

“If the media had fully reported the story about Hunter Biden’s laptop before the 2020 election, how likely is it that Joe Biden would have been elected president?”

Among those who most closely track the Hunter Biden news, two-thirds (65%) say it’s either “not very likely” (23%) or “not at all likely” (42%) Biden would’ve won, if media had fully reported the scandal. Just 34% of voters who follow the news either “not very closely” or “not at all” think Biden would’ve lost.

About half (48%) of the 1,000 voters polled say it’s unlikely Biden would’ve won, while 45% think it’s at least somewhat likely he would’ve come out on top, even if the media had covered the news properly

No comments: