AMERICA'S FOOL - IS KAMALA HARRIS MERELY A CLONE OF BRIBES SUCKER GAMER LAWYER JOE BIDEN?

 

KAMALA HARRIS AND BLACK SUPREMACY... you didn't know she's black or when she became black???

https://kamala-harris-sociopath.blogspot.com/2020/10/will-corrupt-lawyer-kamala-harris.html

Kamala Harris tweeted out a link to a group raising bail money for Minnesota rioters. Biden campaign workers contributed themselves. Biden described Antifa as “an idea.” Try to imagine Churchill calling the brown shirts “an idea.”

Senate Democrats like Kamala Harris and Cory Booker worked to prevent the FBI from even having a Black Supremacist category before two terrorist attacks that murdered four people. 

the best-case scenario is that she’s a progressive who repeatedly violated her own principles so that she could promote her career. In the worst-case scenario, she’s just another corrupt, rotten, regressive prosecutor.                          JESSER HOROWITZ

Joe Biden, the corrupt, unaccomplished 47-year career politician, with a reputation of having been a proud segregationist, an unabashed plagiarist and liar, a resolute tale-teller, and a serial flip-flopper, is pretending to head up a radical social-democratic ticket for President of the United States that includes as his running mate the ambitious, disagreeable junior senator from California: Kamala Harris. 

 

Duplicity aside, perhaps the only details of Harris’s speech more cringeworthy than her insincerity was her inability to tell the truth about virtually anything. DAVID KELTZ

Kamala Saves The Day...... well maybe not!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_VX7in8_tc'

 

VIDEOS

The voices inside his Earpiece

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuxAmLM5Bxw

  

Back To The Basement

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmlQP8QS9VI

  

OBAMA-STYLE DIVISIONIST KAMALA HARRIS: RACIST

Kamala Harris is clearly in 'over her head': Concha

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gguu3DN08Yo

 

Kamala Harris struggles to overcome wave of blunders

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQJQmyPRcIQ

 

 US Vice President Kamala Harris 'is such a hoax'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRg6KxiOr3Q

 

 

How Kamala Harris Made Her Millions

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIipQxGdjYs

 

The Shady Side Of Kamala Harris

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flz5k8RPQGk

 

The United States is 'literally leaderless'

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJf-XRgzcjs

 

Newt Gingrich calls Joe Biden a 'sickness'

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVlPJcgRCj8

 

Clyburn: If Biden Chooses Not to Run in 2024, VP Harris ‘First on My List’

1

0 seconds of 2 minutes, 42 secondsVolume 90%

TRENT BAKER

20 Jun 20220

1:49

Monday on CNN’s “New Day,” House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-SC) reacted to a Wall Street Journal report that Democrats were expecting President Joe Biden to run again in 2024 but were not sure if he should.

Host John Berman asked Clyburn to expound on his remarks in the report that he supported Biden first and then Vice President Kamala Harris if not.

The South Carolina Democrat said there was “no question” Biden was “doing exactly what needs to be done” for the United States. He added that if the president didn’t run, the next on his list would be Harris.

“[Y]ou know, there’s no question in my mind that Joe Biden is doing exactly what needs to be done for this great country of ours,” Clyburn replied. “We all know that our democracy is teetering on edge. We need a Joe Biden to get us through this rough patch, and I think he’s doing great with that. We know that his forecast includes Vice President Harris. I support her. And I’m just saying that if he chooses not to run again, first on my list after him would be Kamala Harris.”

Clyburn was asked what should determine whether or not Biden runs in 2024.

“I think a lot depends upon what the issues are after the midterm elections, what kind of impact his policies will have on the outcome of that election, and I think that he will make a decision based upon that,” he explained. “And I think that Democratic voters will be doing that as well. And so, everybody knows that none of us are getting any younger. And we all tend to adjust our activities based upon what time it is at any given juncture. And he’ll do the same.”

Follow Trent Baker on Twitter @MagnifiTrent

Kamala Harris's verbal gaffe during a Juneteenth history lesson

By Rajan Laad

It was an elementary assignment for Vice President Kamala Harris during yesterday’s Juneteenth holiday.

Her mission was to address elementary school children at the National Museum of African American History & Culture in Washington about the significance of the day. Following her address, she was to exchange pleasantries with the children as well as school and museum staff and pose for photos. 

A high school student could accomplish this task effortlessly.

But this is the Biden administration where unchartered territories of colossal ineptitude are breached every day. Harris has been the flagbearer of this incompetence. Just when you thought she touched the abyss, she surprised everybody by going down deeper.

YouTube screengrab (cropped)

During her Juneteenth talk before the school children, Kamala Harris seemed uncomfortable from the very beginning. There were excessive hand gestures, there was hesitation, repetition, long pauses, ill-timed outbursts of laugher, and the occasional inappropriate colloquialism. Her eyes darted across the room listlessly as if she was desperately looking for approval.

This occurs when a speaker is unprepared and has no command of the subject.

A key excerpt from her speech is as follows:

I think that we all know today is a day to celebrate the principle of freedom. And think about it in terms of the context of history, knowing that black people in America were not free for 400 years of slavery.

Let this be a day that is a day to celebrate the principle of freedom, but to speak about it honestly and accurately, both in the context of history and current application

Any student of elementary history knows that the first African slaves in the American colonies arrived in 1619 in Virginia. They also know slavery was abolished in 1865 when the 13th Amendment was ratified.

1865 – 1619 = 246.

Yet Kamala Harris said it was 400 years of slavery.

Is she poor at math or poor at history or both?

The fact is it has been 157 years since slavery ended in America.

We can rule out the possibility that she purposefully overstated the duration of slavery to push any Democrat narrative. It requires adroitness in addition to malice to invent during an impromptu speech. Kamala struggles to even string a coherent sentence, hence purposeful fabrications seem far-fetched.

We, therefore, have to conclude that she really may be ignorant about the history of slavery in the country where she is the second-highest officer holder. 

This is the most recent in a series of ignominious verbal mishaps.

Last month she was at the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Summit when she talked about the importance of working together as a team.

 

 

Also last month, Harris committed a catastrophic verbal mess during a meeting with the Jamaican Prime Minister.

 

 

In March, at the Munich Security Conference, Harris seemed to be at loss for words as she attempted to explain the crisis in Ukraine.

 

 

Also in March, during a joint presser in Warsaw alongside Polish President Andrzej Duda, Harris erupted into laughter when asked about the US’s plans to accept Ukrainian refugees.

Back in January, during an interview on NBC News, when asked Harris about Biden’s failing strategy against Covid-19, Harris rambled incoherently.

 

 

Last October, Harris botched an appearance in a pre-recorded NASA video aimed at promoting science among young children.

 

 

Last June during a TV interview, Harris struggled to answer why she hasn’t visited the US-Mexico border despite being tasked to ‘resolve the border crisis’

 

 

What explains these frequent gaffes?

Harris obviously must have access to the best subject matter experts and speech coaches who would gladly help her prior to her public appearances. She is educated and has decades of experience in politics. 

In addition to lacking in talent, Harris appears to be lacking in effort. She also appears apathetic toward her job, her legacy, and her country. This is a disastrous combination in any field, especially for high political office. 

Why then did Biden’s handlers choose Kamala Harris as his running mate?

It was for the same reason that Obama chose Biden as his running mate.

Biden’s handlers didn’t want any threat to his Presidency from the Vice President. Somebody among Biden’s handlers knew of the astounding incompetence and inarticulateness of Kamala Harris long before it became common knowledge.

The fact that she is female and has pigment under her skin makes her the perfect ‘diversity’ hire that delights liberals. But beyond the superficial attributes, there is a total hollowness within.

Matters have deteriorated to such an extent that she commits elementary mistakes even while addressing elementary school children. Even Biden’s handlers who choose her for her inability must be surprised as to how fast she collapsed.

Biden's handlers have accomplished what they intended to, the inarticulate and ineffectual Kamala has made senile and bungling Biden unimpeachable.

This may be astute political skullduggery but a vile affront to the United States of America.

Kamala's Threat to American Democracy

Who, exactly, is a vice-president supposed to be?

Barry Nussbaum

 

The arrival of Joe Biden’s decision on a running mate is a true turning point in the history of American politics.

There has never before been a presidential candidate who, prior to entering the White House, has shown such undeniable signs of age-related neurological decay. All political disagreements disregarded, the sight of an elderly person succumbing to the demons of those dreaded cognitive ailments -- which all too often rob us of the older people we love -- is truly excruciating to behold.

The political outcome of Biden's mental state is, if possible, even more unsettling. The role of the president is meant to be powerful. All constitutional checks and balances considered, the sheer power of the chief executive, in that one single person invested with authority to counter-balance the power of the legislative and judicial branches, is truly awesome.

In our situation today, we see a man who is clearly not in full command of his mental faculties, who is allowing himself to be considered for that office of chief executive; an office which, unlike a prime minister in a parliamentary system, is intended to be stable and not prone to regular changes in leadership.

The expectation of a normal four-year presidential tenure on Biden’s part if he is elected must, at the very least, be subjected to serious doubt. If pronouncing basic words -- let alone quoting the most famous phrase of our Declaration of Independence -- is such a confusing  ordeal for him, then it is our urgent duty to question whether this individual is fit to be the man who must accept the ultimate responsibility for this country’s national security and well-being.

These facts squarely cast the Democrat side of the current election as not a presidential election at all, but a vice-presidential election.

Should Biden win, the chances are very probable that his vice president will become the 47th president to finish out his first four-year term. As the vice president automatically succeeds to the Oval Office if the president dies or is rendered permanently incapacitated, the profoundly anti-democratic repercussions of this situation is worsened by whom Biden has actually chosen.

The traditional custom for presidential hopefuls is to either choose the second-highest-polling candidate in a primary race, as Ronald Reagan did with George H. W. Bush in 1980, or to choose a highly capable politician who is well-respected by most of the party, as Donald Trump did with Governor Mike Pence in 2016. In both of those cases, the aforementioned running mates reflected the Republican Party and its voters quite respectably while promoting unity.

It is highly questionable, meanwhile, whether Kamala Harris -- aside from all of the establishment media’s expected giddy cheerleading -- really represents her party all that well. She was polling at 2% nationally by the time she ended her own presidential bid on December 3, 2019. Her more radical positions, such as support for the Obama administration’s Iran deal, prosecuting a journalist who exposed Planned Parenthood’s collection and sale of aborted babies’ body parts (while receiving campaign donations from them), and defending Ilhan Omar’s anti-Semitism, may indeed sit well with a great many leftists, but her actions as Attorney General of California may not. While in that position, Harris jailed hundreds on marijuana charges and authorized anti-prostitution sting operations which, according to SF Weekly, disproportionately targeted Latino men (a crucial Democrat demographic). In addition to this -- though she later admitted it was a mistake -- she prosecuted and jailed the parents of truant teens. She even refused to release the names of Catholic priests accused of sexually molesting children, abnegating law enforcement’s most basic and humane duty -- regardless of anyone’s opinion of the Catholic Church.

it is highly debatable if these are positions that a high number of progressives who voted for the Democrat primary runner-up, Bernie Sanders, would approve of. Especially today, being tough on minority and drug crime -- to the exclusion of “white patriarchal” clergy sex abuse -- is not en vogue among the Democratic Party’s truly energized base, which is largely college-educated millennials taught to have contempt for not only aggressive inner city policing, but inner city policing overall.

It also remains a question as to how many black American voters Kamala really represents. Without doubt, she completely failed to gain these voters' support during the primary. Many black Americans responded to Barack and Michelle Obama due to their image as people who empathized authentically with the black experience of living in inner city America. Harris’s flip-flopping on criminal justice issues has clearly deprived her of the Obama touch.

What should highly concern all Americans of whatever political persuasion is the fact that, given Joe Biden’s medical condition, a Democrat victory in 2020 could very likely result in a person for whom only 2% of Democrats and Democrat-leaning Independents supported to become president.

The reasons for Biden’s choice of Kamala Harris as his running mate are as yet not entirely clear. What is very clear, however, is that a new president of the United States in the near future could be a person whom a weak and faltering man chose by fiat, and not someone whom the majority of the country elected by the ballot.

That's a problem.

It's a problem for America -- and it's a serious and profound problem for American democracy.

Barry Nussbaum is an exceptional American businessman and real estate mogul, whose distinguished career extends more than 38 years. He is an experienced news commentator on international affairs, who has been featured on major television networks, web-based and in print media. Visit his site: AmericanTruthProject.org.