Friday, March 1, 2024

DEMOCRAT PARTY PIGS AT THE TROUGH PROVIDED BY RED CHINA - ‘Blood Money’: Gavin Newsom Partnered with Triad-Linked Businessman on Initiative That Brought Chinese Mafia-Linked Businesses to California

THERE IS NO GREATER THREAT TO AMERICA THAN THE LAWYER-INFESTED DEMOCRAT PARTY RULING CLASS OF PAY-TO-PLAY FUKERS, INSIDE TRADERS AND CHINESE BRIBES SUCKERS LIKE THE BIDEN CRIME FAMILY!




JOE BIDEN: GLOBAL BRIBES SUCKERS IN UKRAINE

Elon Musk: 'This SECRET will put Joe Biden & Obama in JAIL!'

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=438bNCaHwk4

The main objective of “political animals” like Obama and the Clintons is to get elected; it’s not to fix a broken America, nor to protect her. There are people who govern and there are people who campaign; Obama and the Clintons are the latter. Just look at the huge Republican electoral gains under Obama and the Clintons. It’s amazing that Democrats who still care about their party still support the very people who have brought it down.


Breitbart Editor-in-Chief and New York Times bestselling Breaking Biden author Alex Marlow told YouTuber Stephen Gardner the Bidens would be in “handcuffs” if the United States “had a responsible Department of Justice.”

 

“Protect and enrich.” This is a perfect encapsulation of the Clinton Foundation  (TWO GAMER LAWYERS - OWNED BY GEORGE SOROS) (WHAT ABOUT THE CHINA BIDEN PENN CENTER?)  and the Obama (TWO GAMER LAWYERS - OWNED BY GEORGE SOROS) book and television deals. Then there is the Biden family (FOUR GAMER LAWYERS - JOE, HUNTER, JAMES, FRANK - OWNED BY GEORGE SOROS AND LARRY FINK OF BLACKROCK)  corruption, followed closely behind by similar abuses of power and office by the Warren (GAMER LAWYER) and Sanders families, as Peter Schweizer described in his recent book “Profiles in Corruption.” These names just scratch the surface of government corruption (ADD GAMER LAWYER KAMALA HARRIS (WANTS TO BE OWNED BY GEORGE SOROS) AND HER LAWYER HUSBAND AND THE BANKSTERS’ RENT BOY, LAWYER CHUCK SCHUMER, OWNED BY LARRY FINK OF BLACKROCK WHO OWNS A BIG PIECE OF THE ‘BIG GUY’ JOE, AND GEORGE SOROS’ RENT BOY (GAMER LAWYER) TONY BLINKEN, AS WELL AS CON MAN (GAMER LAWYER) ADAM SHIFF) AND HIS CORRUPTNESS (GAMER LAWYER) BOB MENENDEZ STILL EVADING PRISON, AND NOT BE VERY LEAST, ERIC SWALWELL (GAMER LAWYER), THE CHINESE HO CHASING BRIBES SUCKER.

    BRIAN C JOONDEPH

 

‘Blood Money’: Gavin Newsom Partnered with Triad-Linked Businessman on Initiative That Brought Chinese Mafia-Linked Businesses to California




Chinese President Xi Jinping meets with Gavin Newsom, governor of the U.S. state of Califo
Huang Jingwen/Xinhua via Getty Images

Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) partnered with a Chinese Communist Party-tied businessman – allegedly connected to the triads – on an endeavor that brought Chinese mafia-linked businesses to California’s Bay Area when Newsom served as San Francisco’s mayor, Peter Schweizer reveals in his new book Blood Money: Why the Powerful Turn a Blind Eye While China Kills Americans.

Schweizer reveals in Blood Money that Newsom has had links to Chinese organized crime through his connections to known triad members and that these connections go beyond the ChinaSF initiative that Newsom launched in 2008 to bring Chinese businesses to San Francisco. Schweizer also argues that Newsom has skirted addressing China’s role in the fentanyl trade that has killed so many Californians.

Schweizer, a New York Times best-selling author whose investigative work has led to bombshell revelations of corruption among America’s elite, highlights Newsom’s relationship with Chinese businessman Vincent Lo, who served as the cochairman of ChinaSF and the president of the Council for the Promotion and Development of Yangtze.

Schweizer describes ChinaSF as “an ambitious effort to make the Bay Area the ‘premiere [sic] U.S. gateway for Chinese companies expanding into the North American market.’”

Schweizer writes in Blood Money:

ChinaSF was highly favorable to the Chinese entities involved: any investment they made in an American company would grant them intellectual property rights in China for the technology developed. It “would involve U.S. companies handing over their secret formulas.” But many of the Chinese companies and businessmen that were involved in ChinaSF and benefited from the program had ties to Chinese organized crime.

Newsom’s ChinaSF partner Vincent Lo has ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as well as alleged ties to the triads, according to Blood Money.

“In the 1990s, Lo’s company reportedly hired triad members to provide ‘canteen and security services’ on his building sites on construction projects around Hong Kong. His company first confirmed the practice, but then Lo denied it,” Schweizer writes. “Lo also backed a Hong Kong politician whose associates were accused of soliciting support from triad members. At the same time, a prominent businessman accused Lo’s companies of ‘sending armed thugs’ likely linked to Chinese triads to forcibly take over his luxury villa complex in suburban Beijing. Lo’s company denies the claim.”

Moreover, Lo is a Real Estate Developers of Association of Hong Kong board member along with his brother, and Schweizer notes that the association’s “leadership is populated with developers linked to the triads.”

“Why did Newsom partner with an individual with all these alleged triad connections?” Schweizer writes. “Lo and his family secured large deals in the Bay Area with help from Newsom’s ChinaSF. Lo and his business associates acquired the iconic Bank of America Center in San Francisco. ChinaSF championed development projects carried out by Lo’s family, including the 555 Howard Street project in the Bay Area, which is tied to the California High-Speed Rail project long championed by Governor Newsom.”

ChinaSF also benefited other businessmen who have ties to the triads, according to Schweizer:

In 2010, Newsom announced that he was bringing the headquarters of a Chinese energy company called GCL-Poly to San Francisco. The company was partly owned by a subsidiary of China Poly Group, a company with “intimate ties” to the Chinese military. In fact, in the 1990s, the company had been implicated in a plan to smuggle thousands of fully automatic machine guns into the United States and has been tied to “sketchy dealings with third-world dictators and arms traders” around the world. China Poly is also said to work “hand and glove” with Chinese organized crime figures: according to one report, triad-linked Stanley Ho once “spent millions” to acquire an object of tremendous propaganda value for the company. Why would Newsom’s ChinaSF green-light such a company’s moving into San Francisco?

Trina Solar Company was another energy company that Newsom announced would be coming to the Bay Area, and it would later be “embroiled in controversy” surrounding an American company’s intellectual property, according to Blood Money. A CEO for one of Trinar Solar Company’s American competitors levied allegations that “it was likely receiving support from the People’s Liberation Army via hackers who were stealing intellectual property from competitors and giving it to the company.”

A GCL-Poly Energy Holdings Ltd. facility in Changji, Xinjiang province, China, on March 2, 2021. Factories in Xinjiang produce nearly half the world’s polysilicon supply. (Colum Murphy/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

The Trina Solar Ltd. headquarters in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, China, on April 24, 2015. Trina Solar is the world’s biggest solar manufacturer. (Tomohiro Ohsumi/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Additionally, Newsom touted the arrival of offices for the Chinese-government-controlled newspaper China Daily in San Francisco through ChinaSF.

Notably, the ChinaSF initiative was being launched at the same time then-mayor Newsom ran a “fake-out” in San Francisco during the passing of the torch relay in the lead-up to the 2008 Beijing Olympics after protests in major European cities had “deeply embarrassed” China, Schweizer explains.

“Earlier torch relays in London and Paris had been met by human rights protestors, which had deeply embarrassed Beijing. So Newsom executed an intricate ‘fake-out,’ changing the torch relay route at the last minute, leaving thousands of protestors and supporters at one end of San Francisco while the torch passed through the other side of town,” Schweizer writes. “The protestors were furious, as were Bay Area leaders from Newsom’s own political party.”

Pro-China spectators who had been waiting since as early as 6 am along the intended route of the Olympic Torch relay watch as a phalanx of police walk to take up positions along the originally planned route on April 9, 2008, in San Francisco, California. The torch was diverted shortly after being lit and never took this route. (ROBYN BECK/AFP via Getty Images)

The first torch runner, Chinese Olympic swimmer Lin Li (left) holds the flame and waves at the start of the Olympic Torch relay on April 9, 2008, in San Francisco, California. Hundreds of baton-wielding police herded the Olympic torch through San Francisco as organizers switched the relay course to avoid people protesting the Chinese Communist regime’s human rights abuses, as happened during the Beijing Olympic’s torch relays through Paris and London earlier. (ROBYN BECK/AFP via Getty Images)

Protestors scaled the Golden Gate Bridge to hang “Free Tibet” banners on April 7, 2008, in San Francisco, California, in anticipation of the Beijing Olympic’s torch relay through San Francisco that day. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Two sailboats with pro-Tibet banners pass police and Coast Guard boats patrolling the harbor before the start of the Olympic Torch relay on April 9, 2008 in San Francisco, California. (ROBYN BECK/AFP via Getty Images)

Tibetan activists protest before before the 2008 Beijing Olympic torch relay in San Francisco, California, on April 9, 2008. Police on bicycles, in boats and in running shoes deployed along San Francisco’s waterfront as thousands of protesters gathered for a shortened and re-routed relay of the 2008 Olympic torch in San Francisco, which was the only North American stop for the Beijing Olympic’s torch relay. (Kimberly White/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Thousands of protestors march up San Francisco’s Embarcadero to the Ferry Building were they hoped to greet the Beijing Olympic Torch relay on April 9, 2008. But San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom re-routed the torch relay at the last minute to avoid embarrassing the Chinese Communist regime. (LANCE IVERSEN/San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images)

San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom’s police officer drag to the ground a pro-Tibetan demonstrator protesting China’s human rights abuses during the Beijing Olympic Torch relay in San Francisco, California, on April 9, 2008. (Ryan Anson/AFP via Getty Images)

San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom’s police officers tackle a pro-Tibetan demonstrator protesting China’s human rights abuses during the Beijing Olympic Torch relay in San Francisco, California, on April 9, 2008. (Ryan Anson/AFP via Getty Images)

Newsom’s links to triad members also went beyond the ChinaSF endeavor, Schweizer writes:

Mayor Newsom worked with a San Francisco businessman named Allen Leung and reappointed him as chairman of the Chinatown Economic Development Group. But Leung was no ordinary businessman; he was the dragonhead of the “ominous” Chee (variously “Ghee” or “Gee”) Kung Tong, “transpacific incarnations of criminal Triad gangs originating in China.” Members of his gang were involved in the drug trade. Leung was brutally murdered in 2006.

Then there is Raymond “Shrimp Boy” Chow, “Leung’s successor,” with whom “Newsom also had a fishy history,” according to Schweizer. The Blood Money author explains that Shrimp Boy was “an organized crime leader in San Francisco’s Chinatown” and served multiple prison sentences in the 1970s and 1980s for armed robbery and assault with a deadly weapon, respectively. After that, “he worked for leaders in the Wo Hop triad” and was incarcerated again in the 1990s on firearms charges, Schweizer reports. Shrimp Boy cooperated with the Department of Justice, leading to his early release.

FBI agents lock up the door of the Ghee Kung Tong Free Mason building in San Francisco, California, on March 26, 2014. This was one of many locations raided by the FBI as part of a widespread federal criminal complaint filed on March 24 involving State Sen. Leland Yee and 25 others including Raymond “Shrimp Boy” Chow, the leader of the Ghee Kung Tong organization. (Laura A. Oda/MediaNews Group/East Bay Times via Getty Images)

FBI agents raid the Ghee Kung Tong Free Mason building in San Francisco, California, on March 26, 2014, as part of a massive investigation of Raymond “Shrimp Boy” Chow’s Ghee Kung Tong organization. (Laura A. Oda/MediaNews Group/East Bay Times via Getty Images)

Tony Serra, right, former attorney for Raymond Chow, known as “Shrimp Boy,” pictured at left, listens to speakers at a news conference in San Francisco on April 10, 2014. A federal judge on Aug. 4, 2016, sentenced the San Francisco Chinatown gang leader known as “Shrimp Boy” to two life sentences, one for killing a rival, in a wide-ranging organized crime investigation that also brought down a state senator. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)

“Controversy ensued when Shrimp Boy took control of an organization that the mayor’s office was funding. Public outrage in the Asian community in San Francisco led Newsom to cancel the contract,” Schweizer writes. “The grant was withdrawn, but there seemed to be no animus with the mayor. Chow later posted a photo of himself with then lieutenant governor Gavin Newsom on his Facebook page.”

While Newsom was still lieutenant governor in 2016, Shrimp Boy, who was a “dragonhead” of the Chee Kung Tong himself, landed in severe legal trouble that lead to a murder conviction. Schweizer writes:

In 2016, Shrimp Boy was charged with a total of 162 counts of racketeering, aiding and abet- ting the laundering of drug money, and other offenses and was found guilty of murder. Among those crimes was his apparent involvement in the killing of Leung.

Shrimp Boy’s lawyers argued that the prosecutor in his case, who had been appointed by Newsom, culled “political figures out of the prosecution.” Those who skirted criminal charges, according to the lawyers, included individuals “appointed, connected, extremely closely associated with” Gavin Newsom and other political elites.

One of Shrimp Boy’s collaborators was a man named Keith Jackson, who would eventually face a murder-for-hire charge that was dropped when he took a plea deal, according to Blood Money.

Newsom appointed Jackson to his transition team in 2003, when Newsom was San Francisco’s mayor-elect. Jackson was described as “a fixture in the hallways of City Hall” when Newsom was mayor, Schweizer notes. Laurence Pelosi, Newsom’s cousin, even hired Jackson as a consultant for a large real estate project that was important to Newsom, according to Schweizer.

Shrimp Boy partnered with Jackson because he held “a lot of political influence and can do ‘inside deals’ with the City,” but Jackson also “had a very dark side,” according to Blood Money.

“While the FBI was investigating Shrimp Boy, its agents were introduced to Jackson, who claimed that his son ran a $50,000-a-week drug business,” Schweizer writes. “Jackson was later charged in a murder-for-hire scheme and a gunrunning deal involving Shrimp Boy and the Chinese triads. Those charges were dropped as part of a plea agreement.”

Blood Money also dives deeply into Newsom’s posture toward China as governor and his reluctance “to support even rudimentary initiatives designed to contain China’s activities in California.”

For example, Blood Money points to a bipartisan bill that Newsom ultimately vetoed in 2022, which would have halted the sales of the state’s agricultural land to foreign governments. China was the “primary focus” of the bill.

“Perhaps part of Newsom’s motive over the years has been financial,” Schweizer contends.

“He sells his wines in both mainland China and CCP-controlled Hong Kong,” Schweizer writes. “In recent years his wife has been a shareholder in several Chinese companies, to the tune of potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars.”

Meanwhile, Newsom does not appear “remotely interested” in holding China accountable for its role in the global fentanyl trade, Schweizer points out.

A homeless man is seen on a sidewalk as San Francisco fights with fentanyl problems in San Francisco, California, on February 26, 2024. (Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu via Getty Images)

A homeless man and his dog seen on a sidewalk as the city fighting with fentanyl problems in San Francisco, California, on February 26, 2024. (Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu via Getty Images)

A homeless man is seen on a sidewalk as the city fighting with fentanyl problems in San Francisco, California, on February 26, 2024. (Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Homeless people are seen as the city fights with fentanyl problems in San Francisco, California, on February 26, 2024. (Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu via Getty Images)

“A broad national conversation dealing with Chinese organized crime, which is intimately involved in the drug trade, would raise uncomfortable questions for Newsom. And politicians like to avoid discomfort,” he writes in Blood Money.

For instance, Newsom unveiled a vision to address the fentanyl crisis in March 2023 that failed to include measures to hold the CCP accountable for the drug trade it is so heavily involved in.

“The strategy included elements such as deploying the National Guard to seize fentanyl supplies, conducting overdose prevention efforts, raising awareness about the dangers of drugs, and holding the ‘opioid pharmaceutical industry accountable,’” Blood Money states. “Somehow Newsom’s comprehensive plan overlooked holding Beijing accountable for its involvement in every step of this scourge.”

Months later, in October 2023, Newsom trekked to China for an eight-day, six-city tour organized by the Chinese People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries rather than the United States because Newsom is only a state official, not a federal official. Schweizer highlights that the Chinese People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries is affiliated with Chinese intelligence.

Newsom received “superlative treatment” from Beijing during the trip, according to Blood Money, evidenced by his meeting with Chinese Communist Leader Xi Jinping in the Great Hall of the People, the optics of which were starkly different from Secretary of State Anthony Blinken’s visit months before.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom walks up a section of the Great Wall on the outskirts of Beijing, China, on Oct. 26, 2023. (AP Photo/Ng Han Guan, File)

California Gov. Gavin Newsom, left, meets with Chinese Communist Party Leader Xi Jinping at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on October 25, 2023. (Office of the Governor of California via AP)

“In an unusual move, Newsom was allowed to sit side-by-side with the Chinese leader, a sign of respect. When US Secretary of State Tony Blinken had visited earlier in the year, Blinken sat opposite Chinese officials while Xi was in the center—a position of superiority,” Schweizer writes.

A Chinese writer described the Newsom meeting as a well-intended gesture to the United States. However, it was also seen as China having a “long-term investment” in the governor, Schweizer notes, directly quoting the writer.

American media was shut out from the meeting, and Newsom completed his visit without publicly criticizing Beijing. He did, however, call on Americans “to tone down their criticisms of China,” Blood Money notes. However, Newsom’s office claimed that he did confronted Xi about precursor chemicals used in synthesizing fentanyl.

“Newsom’s office says that he brought up the subject of fentanyl with Xi in the context of ‘China’s role in combating the transnational shipping of precursor chemicals,’ implying the shipments were somehow occurring independent of the Chinese government,” Schweizer notes. “Hong Kong media wrote that Newsom ‘mentioned the fentanyl crisis in the United States’ to Xi but did not elaborate.”

Newsom would later state that his conversations with Xi around fentanyl were “honest,” but he caveating this by adding that “no fingers were being pointed.”

“For Newsom, it appears that honestly addressing the fentanyl crisis by dealing with China’s central role in the crisis might disrupt his political and financial security,” Schweizer concludes.

Blood Money, published by Harper-Collins, is available now. Schweizer, a senior contributor to Breitbart News and the president of the Government Accountability Institute (GAI), is the best-selling author of Profiles in Corruption, Clinton CashSecret Empires, and Red-Handed.


AND TO THINK, WE ALWAYS THOUGHT GETTY OWNED THEIR BOY GAVIN!

California Governor Under Fire for Bizarre Minimum Wage Carveout That Benefits Donor

Gavin Newsom (Jerod Harris/Getty Images for Vox Media)
February 28, 2024

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D.) has come under fire for allegedly pushing to exempt a chain of restaurant franchises owned by one of his most generous donors from the state’s new minimum wage law. 

The fast-food wage law, which will raise California’s minimum wage at fast-food chains from $16 to $20 an hour starting in April, comes with an exemption for restaurants that bake and sell bread, which would include the two dozen Panera Bread locations owned by Newsom’s billionaire donor Greg Flynn. 

Newsom advocated for the bread exemption, which legislators eventually included in the bill to win over the governor, due to his "longstanding relationship with a Panera franchisee," one person familiar with the law’s passing told Bloomberg

Flynn has been involved in several business deals with Newsom and made large donations to his campaigns, including $100,000 to quash a Republican-led recall effort against the governor and $64,800 to help him get reelected in 2022. The business magnate also said he knows Newsom well enough to be able to reach him via text, Bloomberg reported. 

Flynn denied he played a role in bringing about the exemption, although sources have told Bloomberg he privately urged the governor’s team to not classify Panera as a fast-food chain. According to Newsom, the wage law, known as the FAST Act, was the "result of countless hours of negotiations with dozens of stakeholders over two years." 

The exemption for bread-selling restaurants came as a surprise to many, including Michelle Korsmo, head of the National Restaurant Association, who said "everyone’s scratching their head" about the exemption. "You may be celebrating or you may be lamenting the bakery exemption. But remember, all of that comes through relationships," she told Bloomberg

Even the bill’s lead author, Assemblyman Chris Holden (D.), claimed to be unsure about the exemption’s origins, with his chief of staff Willie Armstrong telling Bloomberg, "We don’t know how that came about." 

The wage law faced immediate backlash from fast-food chains operating in California. McDonald’s described the increase in minimum wage as a "devastating financial blow" that will cost each of its locations in the state an estimated $250,000 a year. Other chains such as Chipotle are reportedly eyeing a price increase to counter the rise in wage costs. 

Published under: California Gavin Newsom Minimum Wage

New $20 minimum wage law in California set to take effect, but people notice an ‘obscure’ exemption

Talk about fortuitous! In a strange turn of events, one of Gavin Newsom’s biggest donors hits the jackpot, and when the state-mandated $20 minimum wage for certain fast-food workers takes effect in April, this lucky duck employer won’t be subject to complying with the increase, thanks to an “obscure” exemption in the statute.

Here’s the story, from Fox News yesterday:

A major donor to Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom is expected to reap the benefit of an obscure exemption to the state’s new $20 minimum wage regulations for the fast food industry that will allow some of his restaurants to continue paying lower wages.

Here’s how the report from Bloomberg framed the issue:

The governor pushed for a carve-out that’s perplexed industry observers and benefited a donor.

Greg Flynn is a billionaire, one of Newsom’s (and other Democrats’) most loyal and longtime benefactors, and according to Bloomberg, “the largest restaurant franchisee in the US, if not the world.” Flynn’s fast-food portfolio includes establishments like Taco Bell, Wendy’s, and Pizza Hut… but his California fast-food portfolio is limited to one brand: Panera Bread.

And, surprise surprise, the new law’s “obscure exemption” seems only applicable to… Panera Bread. As the Fox report states:

Newsom pushed for the exemption, which allows restaurants baking and selling bread as a standalone item to continue paying the current rate of $16 to its employees. That means billionaire Greg Flynn, a longtime donor to the governor, could save hundreds of thousands of dollars a year per each of his two-dozen Panera Bread franchise locations across California….

Interesting. What happened to all of Newsom’s “fair share” talk?

Flynn and Newsome go way back; from Bloomberg:

Flynn attended the same high school as Newsom in the suburbs outside San Francisco.

Over the years, Flynn’s donations to Newsom’s political campaigns have included $100,000 to fight off a conservative-led recall effort and $64,800 to support the governor’s reelection in 2022. Flynn has been known to tout his relationship with Newsom, according to people familiar with the matter, with one saying the fast-food entrepreneur has said he can reach the governor via text.

A business connection goes back to 2014, when Flynn acquired a Napa Valley resort managed by Newsom’s hospitality company. Newsom, who was then serving as California’s lieutenant governor, reported an undisclosed amount of income from Flynn’s company that year.

(Oh, and apparently all of Newsom’s assets were placed into a blind trust in 2018 when he won the gubernatorial race—so not a lot of financial transparency there either.)

The corrupt Democrat’s actions have “perplexed” the people who are supposedly experts? In other news, the hens are shocked—shocked I tell you—to learn that the fox never intended to guard the henhouse.

Image generated by AI.


Demo-rats

Yes, the “c” in Democrat today is either silent or should be dropped totally from the party name. 

Demolishing America is what they’re all about nowadays, and only anti-American traitors would do that. 

Thus, Demo/rats is a much more accurate descriptor for these destructive vermin. 

So, what are some of the most problematic examples to date? 

  1. Demo/rat demolition of national security:  When a country’s borders are permeable, national security is compromised.  United States’ borders today are nearly nonexistent, and that has been true since the current Demo/rat occupant of the White House moved in three years ago.

Obviously, this provides an open door for terrorists to come here.  As most will remember, the 9/11 fanatics -- pretending not to be fanatics -- came to the U.S. legally on temporary visas.  Today, radicals of all types can just walk into the country unimpeded … or marginally inconvenienced at best. 

Hundreds on the terrorist watchlists have been “encountered” at the Southern border, which means others made it through without being stumbled upon.  Plus, it’s likely the number of terrorists not on the watch list -- extremists unknown to the U.S., i.e., pretending not to be -- is orders of magnitude larger.  As a result, it’s almost certain that thousands of bad actors have come through America’s unsecured borders.

Should Americans be concerned that some might have brought weapons with them?  Automatic weapons?  Biological weapons?  Chemical weapons?  Cyber weapons?  Directed energy weapons?  Small nuclear weapons?  The possibilities are endless and with thousands of “got aways” how can anyone know?

Pathogens -- weaponized or unweaponized -- would be high on the list based on how easy it would be to bring them into the country.  Illegal aliens have brought innumerable diseases here that are not normally found in the U.S., but it’s unknown how many concealed bioweapons they might have transported.  We may find out sometime soon and the targets could include our food supply -- crops and livestock -- not just people. 

Regardless of the weapons utilized -- one type or many different types -- the consequences could be catastrophic, making 9/11 seem small-scale by comparison.  And if a coordinated assault occurs across the U.S., think what China, Russia, Iran, North Korea and other enemy nations might do while American national security assets are overwhelmed here.  Most are testing America’s resolve already. 

Hmmm!  Could that mean the recent influx of military-aged Chinese males at the southern border isn’t because they’re escaping persecution back home?  Surely, any card-carrying members of the Chinese Communist Party would have presented those credentials to officials at the U.S. border, right?  You bet!  

So, when attacks happen, who will have caused them?  The Demo/rat Commandless-in-Chief and those pulling his puppet strings!

  1. Demo/rat demolition of the U.S. economy, a.k.a., Bidenomics:  As noted in my Ayn Rand-prescience blog about Bidenomics last year, “‘You can avoid [the brain-dead] reality’ of destroying America’s energy independence, ‘but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding [that] reality.’ Clearly, increases in gas prices were going to accompany this executive duncemanship [cancelling oil and gas projects].  However, once that domino fell, a whole cascade of additional ones tumbled immediately thereafter. Higher gas costs led to supply chain problems which created product shortages that drove up consumer prices thereby providing a vessel for … what? Inflation!”  Thus, Bidenomics sent the country down the path where working Americans can’t afford food and other essentials. Who caused it?  The very same Demo/rat Commandless-in-Chief and his puppet masters! 

 

  1. Demo/rat demolition of law and order, a.k.a., Demo/rat facilitation of crime:  Moving to the local level, lawlessness is the norm in most cities led by Demo/rats and that has been true for a few years now.  Defund the police and similar moronic actions have plagued numerous cities, yet the Demo/rats in charge never fix the problems.  They just move to cashless bail or whatever is next on the stupid list. 

Who caused it?  Demo/rat mayors! 

Who else contributed?  Demo/rat city councils and public defenders (sic), today’s public adversaries!

  1. Demo/rat demolition of civility -- the woke acronyms:  Technically speaking, these were not a product of the Demo/rat party; the efforts were led by “socialist-loving “intellectuals’”  within America’s universities.  Nonetheless, they’re all registered Demo/rats.  Thus, it’s the same difference and the Demo/rat party has blessed each and every acronym along the way.   
  1. CRT:  Critical race theory is total B.S. and those who pushed it were and are, in fact, the racists.  Although CRT is no longer advocated publicly, Demo/rats are still closet supporters, i.e., closet racists.  They just change the terminology when the acronym of the day -- e.g., CRT --is proven to be totally bogus.  “White privilege” hasn’t been abandoned yet, but when it is, some other racist nomenclature will follow. 

Who are the champions?  Demo/rats nationwide!  

  1. ESG:  Environmental, social and governance “principles” (sic) have fallen out of favor among mainstream Demo/rats.  Of course, that only happened because of financial return problems on Wall Street.  Billions were pulled from money bleeding ESG funds.  Investors tend not to favor losing propositions. 

Obviously, that doesn’t mean anything has changed with the Demo/rat’s environmental, social and governance agendas; they just stopped using ESG as the acronym. 

Who are the champions?  Demo/rats nationwide!  

  1. DEI:  Diversity, equity and inclusion has been one of the biggest hiring boondoggles ever.  As noted in my American Thinker article a year ago (https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/02/is_it_dei_ied_or_die_yes_it_is.html), “When America’s woke progressives successfully snookered the nation into accepting equity (the impractical pursuits of equal outcomes) as a replacement for equality (equal opportunity) the ballgame changed, majorly.  The topline issue is no longer about hiring the applicant with the best credentials to do the work.  Today, training and experience for a job barely count with DEI employers.”

And what will equal outcomes do to any organization’s bottom line eventually?Turn profits into loses … the path to bankruptcy.

Who are the champions?  Demo/rats nationwide!  

  1. Demo/rat demolition of patriotism and Americanism:  Those two terms are nonexistent within today’s Demo/rat party.  Truthfully, though, they’ve been missing from the Demo/rat vocabulary since at least when I came home from Vietnam in 1969 proud of my combat service and that of my brothers-in-arms.  The socialist/communist Demo/rats openly disparaged anyone who was patriotic back then, and that condemnation has grown ever since. 

Who caused it?  Anti-America Demo/rats writ large nationwide! 

So, how do we fix these Demo/rat messes plus others, assuming they are fixable?

It won’t be easy, but 2024 may be America’s last chance to turn things around.  If that doesn’t happen in all critical political races nationwide, America’s world leadership will end prior to the nation’s 250th birthday in 2026.  Tragic, indeed! 

Closing warning, though, if the Demo/rats are defeated in the most crucial White House race in November.  You can be certain that world events -- here and abroad -- will spiral out of control prior to the changing of the guard in January 2025.  It will be hold-your-breath time for a couple months.  The national security concerns noted above could explode into a devastating reality. 

And who will have caused it?  Demo/rats!  

R.W. Trewyn earned a PhD after surviving Vietnam combat, and more treacherously, endured 53-years postwar slogging academe’s once hallowed halls.



Illegal Aliens Unleashed onto the Streets of San Diego by Border Patrol

CRAIG BANNISTER | FEBRUARY 23, 2024
DONATE
Text Audio
00:0000:00
Font Size

The Border Patrol released more illegal aliens onto the streets of an already-overwhelmed San Diego, California on Friday, at the same time that a “welcome center” for immigrants was forced to shut down because it ran out of funding, due to the surge.

“The Border Patrol bus released approximately 200 migrants onto the streets in San Ysidro, where they were then handed over to a non-governmental organization for help,” Fox News reported Friday.

The release of illegal immigrants on Friday is the latest instance of ongoing Border Patrol releases into San Diego.

In just one five-week period late last year, nearly twenty thousand migrants were dropped off in San Diego, local station CBS 8 reported on October 18, 2023:

“Border Patrol has dropped off more than 18,500 migrants into San Diego over the past five weeks. More than 1,400 migrants have been dropped off in Oceanside and local nonprofits and city governments are stepping up to help. 

Last week, CBS 8 reported that Border Patrol had dropped 13,000 in one month's time, meaning there has been at least a 5,500 increase in just seven days.”

Indeed, illegal immigrants are increasingly flooding into San Diego, between official ports of entry. And, if apprehended, they’re overwhelming detention facilities.

Border Patrol encounters between ports of entry in San Diego Sector are up 73.8% through the first four months of the current fiscal year (Oct. 2023-Jan. 2024), surging to 120,124 from 69,117 in the same period last year. In each month, the number of encounters was at least sixty percent higher than the same month year-ago.

censorship image mid

Similarly, encounters with illegal immigrants at the port of San Diego by U.S. Customs and Border Control’s Office of Field Operations are up 70%, from 36,834 in the first four months of FY2023 to 62,722 in FY2024 to-date.

Not all of the illegal immigrants released into San Diego stay there, or even remain in the state, however.

Since the Border Patrol drops them off at a bus station, they can simply hop onto another bus and head anywhere else in the U.S. Alternatively, local nonprofits are there to provide them with free transportation to airports and rail stations.

The illegal immigrants claiming to be asylum-seekers are on the honor system to report to a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement office once they settle in their new location. If they do, a court date will be set, where they can plead their case for asylum, if they show up.

What’s more, not all of San Diego’s illegal immigrants hail from Central or South America – some come from far-off, hostile regimes like China.

censorship image mid

The influx of immigrants from hostile countries, who mix in with migrants from more friendly nations, poses a serious national security threat, as MRCTV’s Nick Kangadis reports:

“While the top nationality represented isn’t a complete surprise, with 28,000 criminal invaders from Colombia being encountered, coming in second are invaders from China, with 21,000 encounters in that sector alone since October. The rest of the top 10 includes, in order, Mexico, Brazil, Ecuador, Turkey, Guinea, India, Guatemala and Peru.”

….

“While some Chinese might actually be trying to flee the oppression of their communist government, you better believe that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) would take advantage of such a situation and send in spies and other military-related individuals.”

Suggested Reading by MRCTV

No comments: