Sunday, October 3, 2021

JOE BIDEN MENTAL - FOLKS, YOU NEED TO COME UP WITH HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS FOR MY OPEN BORDERS TECH CRONIES - BUT DON'T CALL IT SOCIALISM FOR WALL STREET - YOU KNOW HOW WE HATE THAT AWFUL TERM 'SOCIALISM' - PUTS BAD IDEAS IN THE HEADS OF WORKING FOLKS

World witnessing 'the death of 2020 Joe Biden'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0IKPep82pI

Big Tech and Big Law dominate Biden transition teams, tempering progressive hopes

https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2020/12/how-many-parasite-lawyers-will-lawyer.html

"Along with Obama (LAWYER) Biden (LAWYER), Pelosi and Schumer (LAWYER) are responsible for incalculable damage done to this country over the eight years of that administration."       PATRICIA McCARTHY 

Add the Banksters’ rent boy Eric Holder (LAWYER) and the up and coming Swamp Empress Kamala Harris (LAWYER, SO IS HER SHADY HUSBAND)…but keep counting….(LAWYER) Brian Deese, Obama-Biden’s loot-for-Wall Street guy.

Hauser also didn’t like the prevalence of Big Law talent on the Department of Justice team, which signaled to him that the Biden administration could go soft on corporate malefactors (i.e., bribsters). 


BIDEN’S WALL STREET CABINET: EXPECT BOTTOMLESS BAILOUTS NEXT!

Biden administration will be committed to austerity and back-to-work campaign aimed at forcing workers to pay for the corporate bailout no matter how many lives are needlessly lost to the pandemic.

https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2020/12/joe-bidens-wall-street-cabinet-biden.html

The selection of Deese and Adeyemo—who both previously served in the Obama administration—exemplifies the revolving door between Wall Street and Washington, DC, which operates constantly, regardless of which party controls the White House.

Big Tech Succeeds Due to Innovation, Imagination, and Lots of Taxpayer Handouts

 By Drew Johnson | October 1, 2021 | 5:17pm EDT

 
 
Elon Musk, founder of SpaceX, speaks during the Satellite 2020 at the Washington Convention CenterMarch 9, 2020, in Washington, D.C. (Photo credit: BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)
Elon Musk, founder of SpaceX, speaks during the Satellite 2020 at the Washington Convention CenterMarch 9, 2020, in Washington, D.C. (Photo credit: BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)

Renowned inventors and entrepreneurs such as Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, Walt Disney, and others were part of the tradition of American free-market revolutionaries who relied on independent determination, rather than taxpayer handouts, to overcome obstacles.

Oh, how times have changed.

Our American way of life has certainly – albeit incrementally and often quietly – crept toward socialism. The COVID-19 government handouts have catapulted us even further in that direction. Many Americans are losing sight of what it really means to be self-made and self-sufficient.

A generation of Americans are now being raised to believe that, when times are tough, Uncle Sam will be there to bail them out. Unfortunately, this includes some of today’s most notable entrepreneurs – particularly in the tech industry.

Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, and many other modern billionaires achieved much of their success by reaching into the pockets of American taxpayers.

In September, Musk’s new SpaceX project was applauded in some circles for launching the first space flight without government funding. That’s really stretching the truth. SpaceX wouldn’t even exist if not for billions of taxpayers’ dollars.

According to a 2019 report by The Verge, “During its first decade of operation, SpaceX operated off of $1 billion, and about half of that money came from government contracts from NASA.” “Musk,” the article pointed out, “notably thanked NASA for the agency’s support after SpaceX launched its very first Dragon cargo capsule to the International Space Station in 2012.”

A 2015 Los Angeles Times investigation found that Musk’s companies – Tesla, SolarCity and SpaceX – all benefited from a total of “$4.9 billion in government support.” CNBC reported at the end of 2020 that SpaceX’s Starlink won nearly $900 million in Federal Communications Commission subsidies to bring Internet service to rural areas. And, although Musk's the world’s second richest man, Tesla received COVID-19 corporate bailout money, even as he tweeted against aid for individuals.

Musk is hardly alone. Other Big Tech leaders have long relied on taxpayer largesse to fuel their success.

In 2019, the Mises Institute compiled a list of government handouts and tax breaks pocketed by Big Tech companies. The authors found Amazon received $3.5 billion, Google devoured $766 million, and Apple snagged $693 million. Even Facebook managed to grab $333 million from taxpayers. Those amounts have doubtlessly skyrocketed in the years since.

In addition to enjoying handouts and tax breaks at the expense of the American taxpayer, tech giants have learned that success isn’t always dependent on being the best or the brightest. It can also come as the result of mastering the art of manipulating the government. Carefully spent lobbying dollars and well-placed friends in Congress have allowed some tech companies to operate as virtual monopolies in some cases and avoid paying for pilfering other companies’ copyrights in others.

The former instance was exhibited during testimony before Congress last year when the leaders of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google faced questions from Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI), who chaired the House Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law.

When Cicilline asked about anti-competitive practices, The Atlantic wrote, he “reduced Google’s Sundar Pichai to mumbling incoherently about kettlebells; using specific examples, the subcommittee members Pramila Jayapal and Joe Neguse prodded Amazon’s Jeff Bezos into admitting instances of his company’s anticompetitive behavior.”

Yet, even with such admissions, no meaningful action has been taken to rein in Big Tech. Why? Fear apparently plays a big part. Bureaucrats and lawmakers certainly took notice when an executive branch appointee got in the way of Google’s attempt to sidestep copyright protections.

The search engine giant was reportedly behind the Obama Administration’s firing of Registrar of Copyrights Maria Pallante last October. It was the first time the Registrar had been dismissed in 119 years. Pallante apparently opposed Google’s efforts to weaken copyright laws responsible for protecting authors, artists, and musicians.

When Henry Ford started out, one of his first companies was one of around 60 up-and-coming automakers in America. It struggled to keep pace with competitors.

After two failed attempts, his third company, The Ford Motor Company, found success while most competitors fell by the wayside. Ford first produced the Model A, and then the famous Model T. Rather than depending on taxpayer bailouts or the use of nefarious means to eliminate government oversight, Ford simply worked hard to make better cars.

Let’s set the record straight: Musk, Zuckerberg, and Bezos don’t belong in the same breath as Ford and other self-made entrepreneurs. These Big Tech tycoons may be rich and famous, but unlike many of the moguls from previous generations, they’ve gained much of their wealth and success by manipulating government officials and ripping off American taxpayers.


BLOG BEST READS

THE INSPIRING EPIC STORY

She conquered herself and then conquered her times to become one of America's greatest Daughters!

         


READ PAGES

 JUST CLICK ON EBOOK IMAGE ON AMAZON



Sen. Kennedy: Dem Real Estate Tax Will Slam 'Millions and Millions of Middle-Class Americans'

 By Megan Williams | October 1, 2021 | 1:57pm EDT

 
 
Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) questions Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget Shalanda Young a hearing to discuss President Biden's budget request for FY 2022. (Photo credit: SHAWN THEW/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)
Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) questions Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget Shalanda Young a hearing to discuss President Biden's budget request for FY 2022. (Photo credit: SHAWN THEW/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

Sen. John Neely Kennedy (R-LA) said a proposed unrealized capital gains tax will “affect millions and millions of middle-class Americans" and "maul the real-estate market and the market for other long-term assets" while appearing on "Tucker Carlson Tonight" Thursday.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen proposed such a tax on the increase in value of people’s assets. Kennedy elaborated:

“The moral of the story is this is what happens, this is what happens when you have a president and a treasury secretary who are on a mission from God to please pink-haired wokers who carry around Ziploc bags of kale."

Below is a transcript of this segment of "Tucker Carlson Tonight": 

Tucker Carlson: “Senator, thanks so much for coming on. So, first to Secretary Janet Yellen’s suggestion that we tax the increase in value in assets that people own, and I think for average people, literally average people, this means real estate. So, what would that mean for people who make $300,000 a year, but whose house has doubled in value? That’s a lot of people. Where would they be if this became law?”

Sen. John Kennedy: “Tucker, it’s really pretty extraordinary. For the first time in the history of ever, President Biden and Secretary Yellen want to tax unrealized gains on inherited property. And let me explain what that means. Let’s suppose you’ve got a young widow with three children; she never remarries. She goes and buys a $150,000 home to raise her kids and she raises her kids in the home. She’s not rich, she works, but her main asset, her only asset, is her home. Fifty years later, she dies. As a result of inflation and appreciation over 50 years, her $150,000 home is now worth $1.75 million. 

“She leaves her home to her kids. Under current law, her kids would not have to pay any income tax on that home if they didn’t sell the property; they wouldn’t have to pay any inheritance tax either, but that’s a separate issue. But under the Biden-Yellen rule, those kids would automatically be taxed on the full value of the home, whether they sold it or not. 

“Now, it’s a little more complex than that, but the point is those kids are not going to have the money to pay the taxes, so they’re going to be forced to do a fire sale on the home their mom worked for, just to pay the taxes. 

“And the United States has never done this. Never. This is going to affect millions and millions of middle-class Americans, it’s going to maul the real-estate market and the market for other long term assets. And I guess the moral of the story is this is what happens, this is what happens when you have a president and a treasury secretary who are on a mission from God to please pink-haired wokers who carry around Ziploc bags of kale.  This is what happens when you have a president and a secretary who want to tax, spend, and regulate America into neo-socialism.”

Carlson: “Yeah. Well, especially since we’re not funding the government with tax revenue anyway because thanks to Janet Yellen, we’ve been funding the whole thing with fake money printed by the Federal Reserve. 

“So, why tax anybody anything at this point? The whole thing is punitive.” 

Megan Williams is a CNSNews intern and junior at Hillsdale College. She is majoring in Rhetoric and Public Address with a Journalism minor. She is the assistant opinions editor for the Hillsdale Collegian and enjoys covering local events, from concerts to conventions. Born and raised in Southern California, Megan is excited to experience D.C. and grow as a journalist with CNSNews.

No comments: