Friday, November 11, 2022

KAMALA HARRIS - AFTER JOE'S IMPEACHED, I WILL START RUNNING FOR THE WHITE HOUSE ON THE DEM PLATFORM OF ABORTION AND 18 YEARS OF ANCHOR BABY WELFARE FOR ALL JOE'S INVADING ILLEGALS

  

It is the handmaidens working for Planned Parenthood who have joked about selling aborted baby body parts.  And it was Kamala Harris, when she was A.G. of California, who viciously prosecuted the young man who exposed that scandal, after she had received a hefty donation from Planned Parenthood.

Planned Parenthood’s $80 Million Payday Sparks Call for Probe

Lawmakers accuse abortion giant of inappropriately taking small-business relief

 

ST LOUIS, MO - MAY 28: The exterior of a Planned Parenthood Reproductive Health Services Center is seen on May 28, 2019 in St Louis, Missouri. In the wake of Missouri recent controversial abortion legislation, the states' last abortion clinic is being forced to close by the end of the week. Planned Parenthood is expected to go to court to try and stop the closing. (Photo by Michael B. Thomas/Getty Images)Graham Piro • April 20, 2021 11:15 am

SHARE

Planned Parenthood improperly took tens of millions of dollars' worth of government loans intended to help businesses during the coronavirus, according to a group of Republicans who want to see the organization investigated.

House lawmakers accused Planned Parenthood of unlawfully using the Small Business Administration's COVID-response program, the Paycheck Protection Program, to obtain millions of dollars in taxpayer funds. Reps. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R., Mo.) and Byron Donalds (R., Fla.) wrote that the Committee on Small Business is calling for the Department of the Treasury and the Small Business Administration to investigate the organization's actions.

"We insist that the SBA and the Department of the Treasury investigate 1.) the distribution of these loans in violation of the relevant affiliation rules and 2.) whether Planned Parenthood violated the law," the lawmakers wrote in a Friday letter.

In May 2020, the multibillion-dollar organization came under fire for taking $80 million in small-business assistance loans. Planned Parenthood said that its local affiliates qualified for the assistance. The Small Business Administration, however, demanded the money be returned, saying local branches were too closely associated with the national organization to be considered independent. Now, GOP lawmakers are looking for answers as to whether or not the organization broke the law.

"At a time where small-business owners are working tirelessly to open their doors and contribute to their communities again, we must ensure the SBA is using relief funding for its intended purpose—assisting our nation’s hardest hit small businesses, not America’s most tragic abortion provider," Luetkemeyer told the Free Beacon. "The SBA must immediately investigate Planned Parenthood’s blatant violation of the rules to ensure guidelines are followed and American taxpayer dollars are protected."

The letter comes as President Joe Biden's Department of Health and Human Services threw open the door for taxpayer-funded abortion. The department unveiled new rules concerning Title X family planning funding that reversed Trump administration policies limiting taxpayer funding for abortion providers. Donalds said taxpayer dollars should not be used to subsidize abortion providers.

"Planned Parenthood—the nation's most notorious abortion provider that has an estimated $2 billion in assets and over 16,000 employees—receiving taxpayer dollars through the Paycheck Protection Program is extremely concerning," he said.

Planned Parenthood defended the loans and accused congressional Republicans of focusing on "baseless political attacks" and targeting centers that "provide essential health care."

"Like many other local nonprofits and health care providers, the independent Planned Parenthood 501(c)(3) organizations who were awarded PPP loans met the eligibility requirements established by both Congress and the Small Business Administration," said Jacqueline Ayers, vice president of government relations and public policy for Planned Parenthood for America.

The Trump administration made changes to the Title X family planning program designed to limit the amount of taxpayer funding for abortion providers. Planned Parenthood withdrew from the program rather than comply with limitations on abortion referrals, forgoing approximately $60 million in annual federal funding.

The HHS rules are expected to take months to implement but will effectively return Title X funding policy to its pre-Trump status. Senate Republicans ripped Biden for allowing the abortion industry to profit from his presidency.

"President Biden took millions from the abortion industry during his campaign," Sen. Steve Daines (R., Mont.) said. "Now, Planned Parenthood is cashing in."

 

we know what the bankster regime of lawyer barack obama, lawyer joe biden and lawyer eric holder did for black america. nada! they were to busy sabotaging america's borders with narcomex and knew blacks would  always  vote black no  matter what obomb's record really was.

BLM conspicuously quiet about massive numbers of Black deaths

By Andrea Widburg

Blacks make up slightly less than 13% of the American population – a percentage that’s diminishing daily as the Biden administration floods the country with illegal aliens from Latin America. However, Blacks are also doing their bit to keep their presence in American relatively small: They’re aborting their babies in extraordinary numbers. CNS News caught up with CDC statistics for 2018, based on data from only 31 reporting areas. They show that 117,626 Black children were aborted – or 33.6% of all reported 2018 abortions.

According to CNS News:

In the CDC report Abortion Surveillance -- United States, 2018, released in November 2020, Table 5 shows, “Reported abortions, by known race/ethnicity and reporting area of occurrence — selected reporting areas,* United States, 2018.”

As the Table explains, “* Data from 31 reporting areas; excludes 21 reporting areas (California, Colorado, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York City, New York State, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Wisconsin, and Wyoming) that did not report, did not report by race/ethnicity, or did not meet reporting standards.”

Nonetheless, the data show that from the 31 reporting areas, 117,626 of the surgical abortions in 2018 were of black children, which equals 33.6% of the total abortions. 

For white children, 135,328 were killed by abortion (38.7% of total); Hispanics, 70,195 (20% of total); and Other, 26,975 abortions (7.7% of total).

In other words, it’s a virtual certainty that more than 117,626 Black children were aborted, although it’s uncertain if they continued to represent a disproportionate number of total abortions. Nevertheless, it’s numbers such as these, combined with seeing my children’s ultrasounds, that turned me from being pro-Choice (I was raised a Democrat in the San Francisco Bay Area) to pro-Life. The Democrats’ relentless obsession with abortion has turned the Democrat party into a death cult and I want no part of it.

While Democrats once spoke about making abortion “safe, rare, and legal,” in the past two decades they’ve elevated abortion to a sort of Holy Grail status within the party. For most of the Democrat women I’ve known, abortion is the one issue on which they have no flexibility. They’re blind to the hypocrisy of weeping over illegal alien children in Trump’s cages (Biden’s cages don’t trouble them) while encouraging the annual death of hundreds of thousands of human lives.

Although the CDC information was released in November, CNS News only reported it now, which is why I’m getting to it now. Still, I think the timing is actually excellent. With the Derek Chauvin trial wrapping up in Minneapolis, BLM is again gearing up to use Black deaths as the cudgel by which they’ll beat American Blacks into a riotous, often murderous, frenzy that leftists hope will finally, once and for all, bring our country to its knees.

Even as leftists beat that drum, though, they’re unperturbed by the annual deaths of over a hundred thousand Black infants and are doing nothing to stop the slaughter of Black children in Democrat-run, gun-controlled, urban neighborhoods. Abortion on that scale has turned entire Black communities into self-perpetuating death cults.

The people who should care most about the welfare of children in the Black community are the mothers. Instead, though, the Democrat obsession with abortion encourages Black women to think nothing about disposing of their pregnancies. The message is clear to the children who manage to survive to birth: Whether they’re killed in utero or out of it, Black lives are indeed disposable.

No wonder 13-year-old boys run around Chicago with guns. If life has no value, what does it matter if you kill someone and it seemingly didn’t matter to those raising “Lil Homicide” that he might be killed.

The cleverest thing the Democrat party ever did was to convince Blacks to engage in what I call “auto-genocide.” Despite all the “Black Lives Matter” protests, the reality is that the very core of the Democrat party values holds that Black lives don’t matter at all.

 

10 Lowlights of Maxine Waters’ Political Career

J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo

WENDELL HUSEBO

20 Apr 202174

5:08

Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) is one of the most controversial members of Congress, with a history of scandalous and bizarre statements and stories throughout her thirty years as a representative.

Below are ten lowlights in Waters’ political career:

1. Waters is reprimanded by a judge for inciting unrest during an ongoing criminal trial

Waters has recently been in the news for encouraging protesters in Minnesota to “get more confrontational” if Derek Chauvin is acquitted of murder charges for the death of George Floyd.

Judge Peter Cahill, who is presiding over the trial, said on the day of counsel’s closing arguments that her remarks were “abhorrent” and “may result in the whole trial being overturned”:

C-SPAN

Volume 90%

I’m aware that Congresswoman Waters was talking specifically about this trial and about the unacceptability of anything less than a murder conviction, talked about being confrontational… I wish elected officials would stop talking about this case, especially in a manner that is disrespectful to the rule of law, and to the judicial branch and our function. I think if they want to give their opinions, they should do so in a respectful, and in a manner that is respectful to the Constitution, to respect the co-equal branch of government. Their failure to do so, I think, is abhorrent.

In addition, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy told Breitbart News Monday he will formally move to censure Waters “over her call to violence in Minnesota,” Breitbart News’ Matt Boyle reported. If just a handful of Democrats cross the aisle and the censure resolution passes, she will be stripped of her duties as the chairwoman of the House Financial Services Committee.

2. Waters lives outside her congressional district

Republican Joe Collins campaigned against Waters during the 2020 cycle and highlighted that Waters does not even live in the district she represents.

“Do you know where I am right now? Maxine Waters’ six million-dollar mansion,” Collins says in an ad. “Do you know where I’m not right now? Maxine Waters’ district.”

“She has a very nice community, she has a really big house – and that’s just one of three or four house that she has,” he also told Fox News. “And meanwhile, she comes to the inner city and preaches the message of hatred, and a message of us vs. them.”

Do you know where I am?
Maxine Waters’ $6 Million Mansion.

Do you know where I’m NOT?
Her District.

Mansion Maxine Waters doesn’t live in her District — I do.

My name is Joe Collins and I’m running for Congress against Maxine Waters.

Help Me WIN: https://t.co/K4OcfhUR0Epic.twitter.com/GgnmvSWSq9

— Joe E. Collins III (@joeecollins3) October 10, 2020

Waters’ home once was counted as part of her own district (CA-43), but it now lands in CA-37, represented by fellow Democrat Karen Bass.

3. Waters calls for public harassment of White House officials

In 2018, Waters suggested people should be harassing and protesting then-president Donald Trump’s Cabinet officials at stores, restaurants, and gas stations.

“I have no sympathy for these people that are in this administration who know it’s wrong for what they’re doing on so many fronts. They tend to not want to confront this president or even leave, but they know what they’re doing is wrong,” Waters said.

“I want to tell you, these members of his cabinet who remain and try to defend him, they won’t be able to go to a restaurant, they won’t be able to stop at a gas station, they’re not going to be able to shop at a department store,” she continued.

“The people are going to turn on them. They’re going to protest. They’re going to absolutely harass them until they decide that they’re going to tell the president, ‘No, I can’t hang with you.’ This is wrong. This is unconscionable. We can’t keep doing this to children,” she concluded.

 

4. Waters claims God sent her to stop Donald Trump

Later that same year, Waters addressed the First African Methodist Episcopal Church in Los Angeles, claiming she was sent to Washington by God to obstruct Trump.

“You’ve gotta know that I’m here to do the work that I was sent to do, and as pastor said to me when I came in this morning, when God sends you to do something, you just do it!” she said.

“So I have a message: I’m going back to Washington tomorrow morning, I’m going to tell them pastor told me to come here and just do it!” she proclaimed.

“I’m not about to sit quietly and allow the President of the United States, or anybody else, to undo all that has been done to make this a great country,” she concluded.

 

5. Waters gets pranked by Russian trolls posing as Greta Thunberg

Waters presumably spoke with two Russians impersonating Greta Thunberg and her father after her staff believed they have connected with the Swedish climate change activist, Breitbart News’ Kristina Wong reported.

A woman who identifies herself as Congresswoman Waters tells “Greta”: “Of course, I know all about you. You have made quite a big, big, big thunder on this issue. I am really, really very proud of you and the work that you’re doing.”

The prank callers trick Waters into making a statement in defense of the environment of an imaginary island named “Chunga Changa.”

The call gets more farcical when “Greta” tells Waters that she met Trump at the United Nations, where he privately insulted her and confessed to threatening Ukraine’s president.

“He came over, he leaned towards me, and said softly, ‘Listen to me very carefully, little girl, you will never achieve your goals,’” “Greta” says.

“He said you will never achieve your goals? Oh my goodness!” Waters exclaims, stunned. “Greta” then says that she cried. “Oh my God did you cry?” Waters exclaims.

 

6. Waters compares Trump to “Kim Jong-Oom” and “Validimore Putin”

Waters spoke in San Diego in February 2018 and compared Trump to North Korea and Russia’s dictators, botching the heads of state’s names along the way.

 

.@MaxineWaters to President Trump: “Why are you so compromised?” #CADEM18 pic.twitter.com/eU3XtT2JEb

— Javier Panzar (@jpanzar) February 24, 2018

7. Waters propagated “BlueAnon” conspiracy theories about Trump and Russia

In the clip immediately above, the congresswoman insinuated that Trump is “compromised” by Putin — a far-left conspiracy theory that has since been proven false. In January 2019, Waters speculated about a Trump-Russia scheme during the 2016 election, even admitting “I don’t have the proof” to substantiate any portion of the claims.

8. Waters says she has never seen police brutality against white Americans

During a new conference in 2002, Waters said of her social justice cause that there is a disparity between the policing of white and back people.

“I don’t see white police officers slamming the heads of little white boys into police cars,” Waters said.

“I haven’t seen them abusing white males. What I see is white police officers abusing black males, and young black males particularly. Yes, I believe it’s racially motivated,” she added.

9. Waters laments that her mother could not abort any of her 12 siblings

Waters, speaking of civil rights marches, alluded her mother could not have any of her children aborted. Waters is the fifth of 13 children.

“I have to march because my mother could not have an abortion,” she said.

10. Waters takes cheap shots at Melania Trump

Typically, a U.S. president’s family members are considered off-limits in political battles, but Waters did not let that stop her from making some low blows against First Lady Melania Trump, without any particular political angle. On one occasion in 2018, she made the non-sequitur remark: “[Trump] doesn’t even know how to spell his own wife’s name.” The year before, she wrote on social media: “Melania can’t trust Trump,” with no further context or explanation of what prompted the statement.

 

 

KAMALA HARRIS, THE GODLESS.

https://kamala-harris-sociopath.blogspot.com/2020/10/kamala-harris-godless-just-follow-money.html

Harris is no friend of religious liberty. Her recent decision to exclaim in the year of our Lord, which has been conveniently picked up by her staff, is a ploy designed to appeal to unassuming Christian voters impressed by "God talk." As the old adage says, actions speak louder than words, and on this score, Harris fails to convince.

It is the handmaidens working for Planned Parenthood who have joked about selling aborted baby body parts.  And it was Kamala Harris, when she was A.G. of California, who viciously prosecuted the young man who exposed that scandal, after she had received a hefty donation from Planned Parenthood.

THE SAN FRANCISCO CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE WAS VERY GENEROUS AFTER KAMAL HARRIS LET THEM AVOID PRISON…. JUST FOLLOW THE MONEY!

As most people know, prior to her being a Senator, she served as the chief prosecutor for the city of San Francisco.  Now, complaints are coming forward that she flat out refused to pursue criminal cases against Catholic priests who allegedly sexually battered children.

People who say they were victims of childhood sexual abuse call out Harris for not doing all that she could to prosecute their cases. 

 

 


Biden Cites God in Predicting Defeat of Pro-Lifers: ‘We’re Going to See What Happens All Over America, God Willing’ (MORE BELOW).


Biden Vows to Legalize Nationwide Killing of Unborn Babies

The deadly face of the Left.

Thirty-five years ago, Democratic Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware, who was then serving as chairman of the Judiciary Committee, gave a speech explaining why he was going to vote against confirming Judge Robert Bork to the Supreme Court.

Biden spoke as a self-proclaimed “child of God” and claimed his opposition to Bork was all about God-given rights.

“I believe that all Americans are born with certain inalienable rights, certain God-given rights that they have, not because the Constitution says they have them,” Biden said in the text of a speech preserved in the Congressional Record. “I have rights because I exist, in spite of my government, not because of my government.”

“As a child of God, my rights are not derived from the majority, the State or the Constitution,” said Biden. “Rather, they were given to me and to each of our fellow citizens by the creator and represent the essence of human dignity.

“It is with this spirit that the framers of our Constitution met in Philadelphia 200 years ago,” he said.

Twenty-five years after he expressed this point of view, as this column has noted before, Biden discussed his views on abortion in a vice presidential debate with Republican Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin.

Martha Raddatz of ABC News, who moderated that debate, insisted on inserting the candidates’ religion into the abortion issue. “We have two Catholic candidates, first time, on a stage such as this,” said Raddatz. “And I would like to ask you both to tell me what role your religion has played in your own personal views on abortion.”

Ryan, who is pro-life, said that “reason and science” informed his position.

“Now, you want to ask basically why I’m pro-life?” said Ryan. “It’s not simply because of my Catholic faith. That’s a factor, of course. But it’s also because of reason and science.”

“Now, I believe that life begins at conception,” he said. “That’s why — those are the reasons why I’m pro-life.”

Unlike Ryan, Biden did not cite “reason and science.” He spoke of abortion as if it were solely a religious issue and addressed the question of whether human life begins at conception as if it were something that was merely “the church’s judgment” rather than a scientific fact.

“My religion defines who I am, and I’ve been a practicing Catholic my whole life,” Biden said. “And it has particularly informed my social doctrine. The Catholic social doctrine talks about taking care of those who can’t take care of themselves, people who need help. With regard to abortion, I accept my church’s position on abortion as a — what we call de fide doctrine. Life begins at conception in the church’s judgment. I accept it in my personal life.

“But I refuse to impose it on equally devout Christians and Muslims and Jews, and I just refuse to impose that on others, unlike my friend here, the congressman. I do not believe that we have a right to tell other people that — women — they can’t control their body. It’s a decision between them and their doctor.”

It was false for Biden to suggest that whether life begins at conception is merely “the church’s judgment.” It is an inescapable fact, just as it is an inescapable fact that abortion ends a human life.

But last Sunday in New York, the man who cited his recognition of God-given rights in explaining his opposition to the confirmation of Judge Robert Bork to the Supreme Court declared once again that he intends to sign legislation declaring a nationwide right to abort unborn babies.

“Look, here’s the bottom line: If Republicans gain control of Congress and pass a nationwide ban on abortion, I will veto it,” said Biden. “And if we elect — they give me two more Democrats in the Senate and we keep control of the House, we’re going to codify Roe v. Wade in January and make it the law of the land.”

This is Biden’s commitment: to sign a law that legalizes the mass killing of innocent human beings.

Federal Judge Orders Michigan Public School to Read Student’s Pro-Life Message Over PA System

LAUREN SHANK| NOVEMBER 9, 2022 | 12:07PM EST
Text Audio
00:0000:00
Font Size
(Screenshot)
(Screenshot)

(CNS News) – A Michigan public high school that refused to allow a student’s pro-life message to be read over the school’s public address service during announcements has been ordered by a federal judge to read the message because, to not do so, is discriminatory and a violation of the First Amendment.

In his Nov. 4 order, U.S. District Court Judge Paul Borman said the Skyline High School in Ann Arbor, Mich., must read over its public address system on Nov. 7, the following statement,

“Attention Students

Are you interested in joining our efforts to protect the health of women and children?

If proposal 3 is passed it would eliminate health and safety regulations, legalize late term and partial birth abortion, no longer require physicians to perform abortions, and eliminate informed consent laws.

If so, email us at skylinerepublicanclub@gmail.com.”

Proposal 3 in Michigan reads, “A proposal to amend the state constitution to establish new individual right to reproductive freedom, including right to make all decisions about pregnancy and abortion; allow state to regulate abortion in some cases; and forbid prosecution of individuals exercising established right.”

(Screenshot)
(Screenshot)

The statement was written by a student at Skyline High School and the school had refused to read it over its PA system, claiming it was “political." Skyline, however,  had allowed similar messages from the left to be announced over the PA system. For instance, students were able to promote abortion, Roe v. Wade, Planned Parenthood, Black Lives Matter, the George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin trial, climate change, and the visit of a Democratic congresswoman seeking re-election.

In response to this apparent censorship and discrimination against a pro-life message, the Thomas More Law Center (TMLC), a nonprofit public interest law firm, sent a letter to the Ann Arbor Public Schools and requested for the announcement to be made.

Ann Arbor Public schools later responded but denied any wrongdoing and continued “to censor Plaintiffs’ speech,” reads a press release from the TMLC.

(Screenshot)
(Screenshot)

The law firm subsequently filed a federal lawsuit Nov. 1 in the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan against the Ann Arbor Public Schools and officials of Skyline High School.

The lawsuit claims “blatant discrimination,” and alleges that the school violated the First and Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the Equal Access Act. It was filed on behalf of David Nielsen and his minor son, who is identified as the “plaintiff,” after his announcement-request was denied by the school for its “political” nature.

“The Constitution protects a student’s right to have a different viewpoint from others and share it within the walls of a public school,” TMLC’s Chief of Supreme Court and Appellate Practice Erin Mersino said. “How else will students learn tolerance toward opinions to which they disagree or how to thrive in our pluralistic society?”

After the plaintiffs submitted their announcement request on Proposal 3, they were sent an email from the school that claimed the statement was political in nature, and therefore, would not be read or posted. The plaintiffs then met with the principal’s secretary, who confirmed the announcement was rejected and not made for that reason, because in his “opinion,” it was “political.”

(Getty Images)
(Getty Images)

“Public schools across our nation are stifling the free speech of conservative students and organizations,” TMLC President Richard Thompson said. “We are working to defend their constitutional rights – rights which the Supreme Court so famously said, they do not lose by merely entering the schoolhouse gate.”

A motion for a temporary restraining order was also filed Nov. 2, “asking the Court to require that the announcement be shared over the school’s public address system at the earliest possible time.” A hearing was held Nov. 4, to which Borman announced that the motion would be granted.

Borman’s ruling deemed that, “Plaintiffs have shown a likelihood of success on the merits of their First Amendment claim,” and that “Defendants seek to silence Plaintiffs’ appropriate speech by refusing to broadcast it with their morning announcements.”

California Enshrines Abortion Until Birth, Rejects Sports Gambling

California abortion (Sarah Morris / Getty)
Sarah Morris / Getty
2:28

California voters overwhelmingly voted for a state constitutional amendment that will enshrine the right to abortion until birth, though voters turned down many other ballot measures, including two that would expand sports gambling in the Golden State.

As of Wednesday morning, nearly two-thirds of voters had backed Proposition 1, which expands current abortion law, which guarantees abortion until viability. The language of the proposition also included a right to contraception, easing its passage.

California was one of several Democrat-governed states to approve such a resolution Tuesday, including Vermont and Michigan.

However, overwhelming majorities of California voters rejected Proposition 26 to allow sports betting on tribal lands, as well as Proposition 27 to allow online sports betting outside tribal lands. Voters approved Proposition 28 to expand arts funding in public schools, as well as Proposition 31 to restrict the sale of some flavored tobacco products. They rejected Proposition 29 to further regulate kidney dialysis clinics — the third time it has failed — and rejected Proposition 30, a tax hike to pay for electric vehicles.

Governor Gavin Newsom (D), who won reelection easily, mandated the purchase of electric vehicles after 2035 but campaigned against Proposition 30, portraying it as an effort by ride-sharing companies to pass the cost of new electric fleets to the taxpayers.

No Republican candidates were doing well in statewide races, though several were holding up well in early counts of congressional races. California takes weeks to finalize results because of its heavy reliance on mail-in ballots, including the use of ballot harvesting.

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News and the host of Breitbart News Sunday on Sirius XM Patriot on Sunday evenings from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET (4 p.m. to 7 p.m. PT). He is the author of the recent e-book, Neither Free nor Fair: The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. His recent book, RED NOVEMBER, tells the story of the 2020 Democratic presidential primary from a conservative perspective. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

THE OLD BRIBES SUCKER JOE IS SUCH A GOOD CATHOLIC!

KILLING THE UNBORN SEEMS TO BE BIDEN'S ONLY TRUE PLATFORM! 

Biden: ‘Give Me Two More Democrats in the Senate and…We’re Going to Codify Roe v. Wade’

CNSNEWS.COM STAFF| NOVEMBER 7, 2022 | 5:38PM EST
Text Audio
00:0000:00
Font Size
(Photo by Stephanie Keith/Getty Images)
(Photo by Stephanie Keith/Getty Images)

(CNSNews.com) - President Joe Biden spoke at a rally in support of New York Gov. Kathy Hochul on Sunday and said that if voters can give him two additional Democrats in the United States Senate, he will be able to move forward with codifying Roe v. Wade—the now-reversed Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion nationwide.

"And, look, here’s the bottom line: If Republicans gain control of Congress and pass a nationwide ban on abortion, I will veto it,” Biden said.

“And if we elect—they give me two more Democrats in the Senate and we keep control of the House, we’re going to codify Roe v. Wade in January and make it the law of the land,” said Biden.

Here is the transcript from the part of Biden’s speech where he said he that if the Democrats got two more seats in the Senate he would they would codify Roe v. Wade:

“Now, Governor Hochul is the first woman to serve as governor of New York. And on Tuesday night, with your help, she’ll be the first el- — woman elected governor of New York.

“And even before the Dobbs decision came down, your governor took action to protect patients and doctors to ensure that the right to choose for a woman in New York would be protected.  (Applause.)  And her opponent, meanwhile, believes that there should be no exceptions, even for rape or incest—none.

“His position is extreme. For example, he’s been down in Washington voting over and over again to defund Planned Parenthood. He’s in the—

“And, look, here’s the bottom line: If Republicans gain control of Congress and pass a nationwide ban on abortion, I will veto it. And if we elect—they give me two more Democrats in the Senate and we keep control of the House, we’re going to codify Roe v. Wade in January and make it the law of the land.”

Chuck Schumer: ‘Republicans Want to Ban Abortion’

CNSNEWS.COM STAFF| NOVEMBER 7, 2022 | 2:47PM EST
Text Audio
00:0000:00
Font Size
(Photo by Lev Radin/Pacific Press/LightRocket via Getty Images)
(Photo by Lev Radin/Pacific Press/LightRocket via Getty Images)

(CNSNews.com) - Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), who is running for reelection, sent out a couple of tweets over the last five days focusing on Republican opposition to abortion.

“MAGA Republicans want to ban abortion, slash Social Security and Medicare and give tax cuts to the rich,” Schumer said in a tweet he sent out on Nov. 2.

 

“The choice in this election is clear,” he said.

“Thank you, New York!” Schumer said in a tweet he sent on Sunday. “Two days to go and the choice is clear.

“Democrats are fighting to lower costs and protect our fundamental rights,” Schumer said. “MAGA Republicans want to ban abortion nationwide and cut Social Security & Medicare.

“VOTE on Tuesday!” Schumer said.

 

SBA Pro-Life America Denounces NPR Audio of Woman Undergoing an Abortion

LAUREN SHANK| NOVEMBER 7, 2022 | 4:36PM EST
Text Audio
00:0000:00
Font Size
A woman undergoes an abortion.  (Getty Images)
A woman undergoes an abortion. (Getty Images)

(CNS News) – The Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America organization called out the “brutal truth about abortion” after National Public Radio (NPR), funded by taxpayers, released a recording on-air of a woman undergoing an abortion.

“This heartbreaking audio exposes the brutal truth about abortion – the destruction of unborn children and exploitation of their mothers for profit,” SBA Pro-Life American President Marjorie Dannenfelser said in a news release.

“We can just imagine the last moments of the unborn child, who has a beating heart by six weeks, is forming unique fingerprints by 10 weeks, and can feel excruciating pain at least by 15 weeks,” she said. “And we may never know the fate of the unnamed mother, but we know abortion can result in life-threatening complications and long-term emotional and mental health impacts.”

The audio recording aired on NPR Nov. 3, and included in-depth detail and ambient sound of a mother getting an abortion around 11 weeks of the child’s development. Although the woman requested to remain anonymous, she gave permission for her procedure to be recorded.

The destruction of her unborn child, according to the audio recording, “feels a lot like a childbirth” with dimmed lights and “soothing music.” The audio continued with a loud machine (vacuum) used to abort the baby, and the sound of the woman in a state of distress.

The abortion was finished in “just a couple of minutes” and the woman was comforted with a “you did it” and “you did great,” the audio reveals.

“This is what Hell sounds like,” Lila Rose, founder and president of Live Action, tweeted in response to the recording. “NPR’S glorification of slaughtering TWIN babies. The sound of their deaths. Pure Hell.”

In addition to denouncing NPR, SBA Pro-life America brought attention to the midterm elections and how pro-abortions Democrats stray from answering specific abortion questions.

“Pro-abortion Democrats have avoided truths like these at all costs on the campaign trail as they dodge questions about their extreme record and whether there are any limits on abortion they would support,” Dannenfelser said. “Exposure to the harsh reality of abortion is important for voters as they consider their choices next Tuesday.”

Suggested Reading by CNSNews
Snuff Radio: NPR Airs Audio Of Woman Getting Abortion, Including Vacuuming, Moaning & Crying
Snuff Radio: NPR Airs Audio of Woman Getting Abortion With Vacuuming, Moaning & Crying
Late Night Hosts Sound The Literal Alarm In Final Election Pitches
Pro-Life Laws Save Thousands of Lives After Roe Overturn

Hundreds of little plastic foetuses are displayed on a square in Houten, August 12, 2013. The Dutch Christian organisation Schreeuw om Leven (Scream for Life) has set up the action to protest against the establishment of a Centre for Birth Control, Abortion and Sexuality Rotterdam (CASA) in Houten. AFP PHOTO …
ROBIN VAN LONKHUIJSEN/AFP via Getty Images
2:31

After the overturn of infamous abortion case Roe v. Wade, “at least 10,000” lives have been saved from abortion as a result of pro-life laws being enacted across the country.

According to analysis done by FiveThirtyEight, there were 10,670 fewer abortions since June’s decision on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization allowed states to regulate abortion.

Several states had trigger laws which automatically made abortion completely or almost entirely illegal, and many other states quickly passed abortion limitations in the aftermath.

While “medical tourism” for killing unborn babies has also increased, SBA Pro-Life America reported of the lives saved that “if these trends persist, there could be at least 60,000 fewer abortions in the next year as a result of the Dobbs decision.”

While FiveThirtyEight’s analysis appears more as a left-wing missive detailing a “pressure wave spreading out from a blast zone,” highlighting pro-abortion University of California – San Francisco professor Ushma Upadhyay’s complaint that the over 10,000 persons “felt they had no options,” others point out the leftist disinformation campaign on pregnancy centers and community clinics that provide life-oriented care.

Anti-abortion campaigners celebrate outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, DC, on June 24, 2022. (OLIVIER DOULIERY/AFP via Getty Images)

There is now a battle between pro-abortion and pro-life states, with the former advertising themselves as safe havens for abortion — even going as far as footing the bill for travel, hotel rooms, and the abortions themselves.

Democrats, too, have attempted to use the issue as a tool in the midterms, but have seen fairly little success.

As one Harris Poll made clear, while 40 percent of voters said the overturn of Roe makes them more likely to vote for Democrats, 37 percent said they were more likely to vote for Republicans — an increase of five points from September.

Harris Poll chairman Mark Penn said of the statistic that, “Democrats may have squandered their advantage by wasting time advocating for a controversial expansion of abortion rights, rather than for a bill that enshrined the rights allowed under Roe.”

One “controversial expansion” Democrats have pushed is the “Women’s Health Protection Act” which aimed at enshrining abortion on-demand and up-to-birth in federal law as well as voiding all state laws aimed at protecting the lives of the unborn.

Breccan F. Thies is a reporter for Breitbart News. You can follow him on Twitter @BreccanFThies.

Abortion on the Ballot in Five States

BILL DONOHUE| NOVEMBER 2, 2022 | 1:10PM EDT
Text Audio
00:0000:00
Font Size
(Getty Images)
(Getty Images)

In August, voters in Kansas turned back an effort to amend the state constitution: it would have declared there is no right to an abortion. Now voters in five other states will decide to expand or contract abortion rights.

Pro-life activists in Kentucky hope to do what the voters in Kansas decided against, making sure there is nothing in the state constitution that creates a right to abortion or requires government funding of abortions.

Voters in Montana will decide whether to legalize selective infanticide. To be specific, the ballot initiative states that infants born alive are legal persons and therefore cannot be denied medical care.

It matters not a whit if the baby survived as a result of induced labor, cesarean section, attempted abortion, or some other means.

Voters in California, Michigan, and Vermont will decide if they want to effectively ban all abortion restrictions.

California voters will decide if their state constitution should be amended to ensure that the state cannot restrict abortions for any reason. California bishops have spoken out against Proposition 1, saying it would provide for late-term abortions (which most Californians do not support).

Gov. Gavin Newsom, who says he is a Catholic, spent $2.5 million over two weeks on ads imploring Californians to vote for the pro-abortion measure.

If Proposition 3 in Michigan succeeds, it means the evisceration of parental rights; it would invalidate state law and allow minors to get an abortion without the consent of one of their parents. It would also allow for abortion at any time of pregnancy and do away with all abortion regulations.

Michigan bishops have branded it the “most extreme proposal” the nation has ever seen.

Vermont already has very liberal abortion laws. On the ballot is a provision, Proposal 5, that would ensure abortion-on-demand right up until the moment of birth. It wants to declare a state constitutional right to “personal reproductive autonomy.”

Do any of these laws matter? Absolutely. An analysis by the New York Times on October 31 found that there has been a 6% drop in abortions nationwide after Roe v. Wade was overturned. Thirteen states banned or severely restricted abortion; nine others added major restrictions. Some states witnessed an increase in abortion, as women seeking to terminate their pregnancy traveled from restrictive states to more liberal states.

Statistics can be cold. The 6% drop in abortions amounts to over 10,000 children who have been spared sudden death.

No state saw a more dramatic decline in abortions than Texas. Kudos to those men and women who stood up for the rights of the unborn. They are a role model for us all.

Suggested Reading by CNSNews
Sen. Lee Opposes National Abortion Ban: 'We Can't Suddenly Make It a Federal Issue'
CBS Morning News Celebrates Mobile Abortion Clinics, Barely Mentions Pro-Life Side
‘CBS Mornings’ Celebrates Mobile Abortion Clinics, Barely Mentions Pro-Life Side

JOE BIDEN SHOULD HAVE BEEN ABORTED! THE WORLD WOULD BE A BETTER PLACE FOR IT!


Joe Biden: I Support Abortion Because ‘No One Knows Precisely When Does Human Life Begin’

MIAMI GARDENS, FLORIDA - NOVEMBER 01: U.S. President Joe Biden during a rally at Florida Memorial University on November 01, 2022 in Miami Gardens, Florida. Biden was campaigning for U.S. Senate candidate, Rep. Val Demings (D-FL) and gubernatorial candidate Charlie Crist ahead of the November 8 general election. (Photo by …
Joe Raedle/Getty
2:01

President Joe Biden defended Roe v. Wade and the national right to abortion on Tuesday during a campaign rally in Florida arguing no one knows when life officially begins in the womb.

“I’m a practicing Catholic. I’ve supported Roe vs. Wade,” he said. “And the reason I support Roe vs. Wade is the most rational basis upon which confessional faiths can agree: No one knows precisely when does human life begin.”

Biden pointed out developing children in the womb were described in three trimesters

“It made sense,” he said referring about the right to abortion. “It made sense on who has what authority under what circumstances.”

The Catholic Church teaches, however, “human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception,” according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

Biden has repeatedly claimed to be a “practicing Catholic” even though he has directly countered Church teaching on abortion.

In September, he revealed he did not agree with the Church on abortion, a theme he has addressed many times before.

“I respect those who believe life begins at the moment of conception and all … I respect that. Don’t agree. But I respect that,” he said.

The president has tried to make abortion a key issue for the midterms, vowing to support federal funding for women trying to pay for an abortion and making nationwide laws to legalize abortion nationwide.

Biden’s midterm campaign for more abortions earned him a rebuke from Baltimore Archbishop William Lori of Baltimore, the chairman of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee on Pro-Life Activities.

President of the United States Joe Biden delivers remarks during a Democratic National Committee event in Miami Gardens, United States on November 1, 2022. (Kyle Mazza/Anadolu Agency via Getty)

In a statement, Lori said Biden’s position was “gravely wrong.”

“This single-minded extremism must end, and we implore President Biden to recognize the humanity in preborn children and the genuine life-giving care needed by women in this country,” he said.


Virginia's Bishop Burbidge: Biden's Pro-Abortion Policy 'Only Brings About Pain and Death'

MICHAEL W. CHAPMAN| NOVEMBER 2, 2022 | 11:23AM EDT
Font Size

Bishop Michael F. Burbidge, head of the Catholic Diocese of Arlington, Virginia.  (Screenshot)
Bishop Michael F. Burbidge, head of the Catholic Diocese of Arlington, Virginia. (Screenshot)

(CNS News.com) -- President Joe Biden said if Democrats retain control of Congress following the midterm elections, he would immediately send a bill to them to make Roe v. Wade the law of the land, a pledge that Catholic Bishop Michael Burbidge denounced and stressed would only bring about "pain and death."

"President Biden recently stated that if the Democratic Party has control of Congress following the November 2022 election, his top priority will be pro-abortion legislation," said the bishop, whose Arlington Diocese is just south of D.C. I condemn abortion and any political tactic that would codify abortion as national policy."

"Fundamentally, abortion ends the life of a precious child and deeply wounds the child's mother," said the bishop. "The role of Congress is to pass laws that serve the common good -- and yet this priority of the president only brings about pain and death."

In a speech on Oct. 18, President Biden said, “The court got Roe right nearly 50 years ago and I believe the Congress should codify Roe, once and for all.”

President Joe Biden at a fundraiser for the Planned Parenthood Action Fund.  (Getty Images)
President Joe Biden at a fundraiser for the Planned Parenthood Action Fund. (Getty Images)

He then said that if Democrats retain control of the House and Senate, "here’s the promise I make to you and the American people: The first bill I will send to the Congress will be to codify Roe v. Wade. And when Congress passes it, I’ll sign it in January, 50 years after Roe was first decided the law of the land."

Although Biden is Catholic, he strongly supports abortion and other issues contrary to Church teaching, such as gay marriage, gay adoption, and gender ideology.

Bishop Burbidge further commented, "Any attempt to codify abortion, rather than to enact policies that support unborn children and mothers, should be met with peaceful, active and staunch opposition from the Catholic faithful and all people of good will."

"While overturning Roe v. Wade was perhaps the most significant pro-life victory in the last century, there is much work to be done to make abortion unthinkable and support mothers in need," said the bishop.  "The Catholic Church has long offered hope, healing and material support to the vulnerable. We stand ready to continue serving all expectant families in need."

Illustration of a D and E abortion, dilation and evacuation. (Screenshot)
Illustration of a D and E abortion, dilation and evacuation. (Screenshot)

In addition to Burbidge, Archbishop William E. Lori of Baltimore, chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee on Pro-Life Activities, denounced Biden's promise to codify Roe v. Wade in federal law.

“The President is gravely wrong to continue to seek every possible avenue to facilitate abortion, instead of using his power to increase support and care to mothers in challenging situations," said the archbishop in an Oct. 25 statement. 

"This single-minded extremism must end, and we implore President Biden to recognize the humanity in preborn children and the genuine life-giving care needed by women in this country," he added.

"As pastors who deal daily with the tragic impacts of abortion, we know that abortion is a violent act which ends the life of preborn children and wounds untold numbers of women," said Archbishop Lori. "The Catholic Church wishes to continue in our work with our government and leaders to protect the right to life of every human being and to ensure that pregnant and parenting mothers are fully supported in the care of their children before and after birth.”  

In its June 24 ruling (6-3) that overturned Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court said, "We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled. The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the defenders of Roe and Casey now chiefly rely—the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment."

 According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, "From its conception, the child has the right to life. Direct abortion, that is, abortion willed as an end or as a means, is a "criminal" practice, gravely contrary to the moral law."


Bottom line here is that the Biden administration doesn't want us to know how it's investigating the baby formula crisis, probably because it played such a big role in making it happen. 

What's Biden hiding on the infant formula shortage?

The Biden administration made a mess with the infant formula shortage earlier this year, and the problem is still ongoing, remaining at crisis levels in some parts of the country.

But don't ask them how thing are going now. After launching a high-profile investigation on why it happened last May 24, the shortages are still there, and now there's a coverup.

According to the Washington Examiner:

EXCLUSIVE — President Joe Biden's Federal Trade Commission is being sued for allegedly blocking the release of records related to its investigation of the nationwide baby formula shortage.
 
The Functional Government Initiative, an ethics watchdog , sent a Freedom of Information Act request in August to the FTC for the records, noting their release is in the "public interest." But the watchdog has not received any records as of this writing and is now suing the FTC for "wrongfully withholding them," according to a Wednesday complaint obtained by the Washington Examiner.

"FGI anticipates that officials and staff at FTC discussed and participated in making and implementing decisions about the investigation into the infant formula crisis," read the watchdog's lawsuit. "The public does not have an ability to easily evaluate the decision-making surrounding FTC’s investigation."

 

The Functional Government Initiative smelled a rat on this probe, suspecting that the FTC was in bed with leftists in Congress, as well maybe taking orders from NGOs and Big Labor unions, and quite possibly making insulting remarks about all the moms with babies who were sending in the requested public comments to the agency as requested. There also was a legitimate question as to why it took the feds so long to investigate the baby formula shortage, given that it claimed a whistleblower complaint sent to it was "lost" in the mailroom for four months. Really? 

They made a request for the public records on this, and got stonewalled.

The formula is still in shortage, with the Washington Examiner citing data showing that it's just 87% in stock, compared to around 90% before the pandemic. The Examiner also cited a newly released household survey from the Census bureau stating that 30% of households say they still can't get the formula they need, meaning, some places may have a surplus, and others may have way less. That's how averages go, assuming the data are correct, and given that this is the Biden administration, it might not be.

Bottom line here is that the Biden administration doesn't want us to know how it's investigating the baby formula crisis, probably because it played such a big role in making it happen. Midterms are on, after all, so the records request can wait. The Bidenites along with the Obamatons, have a history of failing to release what are and should be public records, because they would show some kind of disaster.

One can only hope that the moms who were probably disparaged by these sneaky officials take that into account on election day -- and vote accordingly.

Image: John Crowley, via Wikimedia Commons // CC BY-SA 2.0


"Along with (LAWYER) Obama, Pelosi and (LAWYER) Schumer are responsible for incalculable damage done to this country over the eight years of that administration (JOE BIDEN (LAWYER) WAS OFF SUCKING OFF BANKSTERS AND BRIBES)." 

 PATRICIA McCARTHY


Capehart: National Dems Have Urged Focus on Abortion, Democracy over Economy

1:26

On Friday’s “PBS NewsHour,” Washington Post Associate Editor and MSNBC host Jonathan Capehart said national Democrats have told Democratic candidates to avoid talking about jobs, the economy, and inflation and focus on abortion and democracy as issues in the midterms, but despite this advice from national figures, “plenty of” individual candidates pushing back against that advice and telling the national party, “I’m listening to my constituents, and they care about the economy. They care about gas. They care about jobs” and running their campaigns accordingly.

After New York Times columnist David Brooks accused many Democrats of spending too much time telling people to care about abortion and democracy and not to care about things like crime, homelessness, and inflation, Capehart stated, “I think Democrats are running — national Democrats, sure, will say, run on this, run on that, and this is your — what your message should be. But, in individual races, there are plenty of Democrats who are saying, don’t tell me what to do. I’m out there campaigning. I’m listening to my constituents, and they care about the economy. They care about gas. They care about jobs. And they are running in that way.”

Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett

JOE BIDEN USES FBI AND DOJ TO HARASS CITIZENS!

'HE HAS BAD FATHER' Garland CHOKED UP after Rick Scott shows Biden's name in 'Hunter' email

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHZR5pOfvHo


 "This is how they will destroy America from within.  The leftist billionaires who orchestrate these plans are wealthy. Those tasked with representing us in Congress will never be exposed to the cost of the invasion of millions of migrants.  They have nothing but contempt for those of us who must endure the consequences of our communities being intruded upon by gang members, drug dealers and human traffickers.  These people have no intention of becoming Americans; like the Democrats who welcome them, they have contempt for us." PATRICIA McCARTHY

Biden Admin. Tramples on Peaceful Pro-Life Protesters’ Civil Liberties

Weaponizing the FBI to arrest pro-lifers in armed home raids

The FBI has targeted peaceful pro-life protesters for arrest, using heavy-handed tactics that should shock the conscience of every freedom-loving American.

In one such case, about twenty armed FBI agents conducted a dawn raid on September 23rd at the home of a pro-life advocate, Mark Houck, who is the father of seven children. Mr. Houck is being charged with violating the federal Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (the FACE Act) outside of a Pennsylvania abortion facility in October 2021. FACE Act violations carry a prison term of up to eleven years. The Thomas More Society is defending Mr. Houck in court.

Thomas More Society’s Vice President and Senior Counsel Peter Breen said that the Biden Department of Justice had rejected Mr. Houck’s offer to appear in court voluntarily to answer the charges. Instead, the Department of Justice dispatched the FBI’s storm agents to Mr. Houck’s home to arrest him at gunpoint.

“Rather than accepting Mark Houck’s offer to appear voluntarily, the Biden Department of Justice chose to make a show of potentially deadly force, sending twenty heavily armed federal agents to the Houck residence at dawn,” Mr. Breen said. “In threatening form, after nearly breaking down the family’s front door, at least five agents pointed guns at Mark and arrested him in front of his wife and seven young children, who were terrified that their husband and father would be shot dead before their eyes.”

The incident leading to Mr. Houck’s arrest occurred during the course of Mr. Houck’s presence outside of an abortion clinic to pray and offer pro-life counseling support to women considering an abortion. He was accompanied by his 12-year-old son. An overly aggressive pro-abortion activist, who was serving as an escort for women seeking to enter the abortion facility, targeted the boy repeatedly with “vulgar verbal attacks,” according to the Thomas More Society.

Mr. Houck did what any good dad would do. He defended his son. First, he repeatedly asked the pro-abortion activist to stop the abuse. Only after the pro-abortion activist ignored Mr. Houck’s calls to back off did the father shove the activist away from his son’s face. The pro-abortionist clearly instigated the altercation and refused to stop harassing Mr. Houck’s 12-year-old boy despite being repeatedly asked to do so.

The Biden Department of Justice never should have brought a federal case against Mr. Houck in the first place. Mr. Houck did not shove the pro-abortion activist away from his son for the purpose of interfering with the activist’s provision of reproductive health services. Mr. Houck’s shove occurred solely in defense of his son after his attempts to de-escalate the tense situation failed to stop the pro-abortionist’s harassment.

The Biden Department of Justice ignored a highly relevant 2019 decision by a federal district court in Pennsylvania that limited the scope of a legally defensible charge of a FACE Act violation. Federal District Court Judge Chad F. Kenney ruled that a peaceful pro-life advocate had a First Amendment right to provide witness and sidewalk counseling outside an abortion facility.

Judge Kenney also played down the significance, for FACE Act purposes, of the alleged use of force that arose out of “a mutual argument” regarding how the defendant was exercising what he believed to be his constitutional rights. The opinion stated that “the Court does not find that Plaintiff has shown a reasonable probability of eventual success in proving that Defendant Sulpizio violated FACE by using force to intentionally injure or intimidate or attempt to injure or intimidate a person because that person is providing reproductive health services.”

The same finding should apply to Mr. Houck. He did not shove the pro-abortion activist because the activist was providing reproductive health services. Mr. Houck acted solely in defense of his son who was being harassed by the pro-abortionist.

Moreover, the pro-abortion activist’s attempt to have Mr. Houck charged at the state level with assault and battery because Mr. Houck shoved the pro-abortionist away from his son went nowhere. The authorities did not press charges. When the pro-abortionist tried to bring the charges himself, his case was thrown out of court.

In short, the Biden Department of Justice ignored both the law and the facts in Mr. Houck’s case and ran roughshod over his civil liberties. The only reason for the FBI to haul Mr. Houck away at gunpoint in a dawn raid at his home was to send an intimidating message to other peaceful pro-life protesters to remain silent or else.

The Biden administration’s egregious abuse of power against Mr. Houck is not simply a one-off case. On October 5th, armed FBI agents arrested Paul Vaughn, President of Tennessee Personhood, at his home. The Thomas More Society is defending Mr. Vaughn against spurious charges of “conspiracy against rights secured by the FACE Act.” The charges are focused on an alleged blockade at an abortion clinic’s entry doors, including allegedly preventing a patient and an employee from entering.

According to the Thomas More Society, Mr. Vaughn was recording a protest by pro-life advocates “sitting in a hallway outside of the abortion clinic singing Christian hymns, reading scripture, and praying.” Mr. Vaughn was also “serving as a liaison between life advocates and the police to ensure the safety of all involved. No one was hurt, and no property was damaged during the pro-life witness.”

Even if there were acts of civil disobedience at the protest, since when does engaging peacefully in such acts, much less simply recording them, justify the punishment that is possible under the FACE Act – 11 years in prison and fines of up to $250,000?

The Biden administration is weaponizing the FBI to go after the administration’s opponents, including peaceful pro-life protesters. The Biden Department of Justice does not even make a pretense of applying the law in an even-handed fashion. We have yet to see them display a mere fraction of the zeal that it has shown in persecuting pro-life advocates when it comes to pursuing the pro-abortion militants who have firebombed and vandalized pro-life pregnancy resource centers.

Avatar photo

Joseph Klein

Joseph Klein is a Harvard-trained lawyer, and the author of Global Deception: The UN’s Stealth Assault on America’s Freedom and Lethal Engagement: Barack Hussein Obama, The United Nations & Radical Islam


U.S. Bishops Slam Joe Biden as ‘Gravely Wrong’ in Promoting Abortion
joe biden
Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images
2:50

ROME — The leader of the U.S. Bishops’ pro-life office has blasted President Joe Biden for his abortion “extremism,” urging him to radically change course.

Baltimore Archbishop William Lori of Baltimore, chairman of the Bishops’ Committee on Pro-Life Activities, responded publicly Tuesday to Mr. Biden’s declaration that his top legislative priority after the midterm elections will be to codify a national right to abortion.

“The President is gravely wrong to continue to seek every possible avenue to facilitate abortion, instead of using his power to increase support and care to mothers in challenging situations,” Archbishop Lori asserted in his statement.

“This single-minded extremism must end, and we implore President Biden to recognize the humanity in preborn children and the genuine life-giving care needed by women in this country,” he added.

President Biden, who self-identifies as Catholic despite flouting core Church teachings, has proven to be the most pro-abortion president in U.S. history, going far beyond the policies and  agitation of Bill Clinton and Barack Obama.

Last year, Kansas City Archbishop Joseph Naumann exhorted President Biden to act like the “devout Catholic” he says he is by opposing the evil of the procedure.

“He likes to call himself a devout Catholic. I would urge him to begin to act like one, especially on the life issues,” Archbishop Naumann said. “And to let his faith really inform his conscience and the decisions that he’s making, not the platform of his party.”

Right now, the Biden administration is “looking for every opportunity to expand abortion,” he added.

U.S. President Joe Biden speaks while meeting virtually with Kathy Hochul, governor of New York, left, and other governors in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in Washington, D.C., US, on Friday, July 1, 2022. Biden discussed his options for protecting women’s access to abortion with the group of Democratic governors. (Ting Shen/Bloomberg via Getty)

In 2021, Catholic League President Bill Donohue noted that Biden has a “rocky” relationship with the U.S. bishops, which is only getting worse.

“It’s time for President Biden to stop living a lie,” Dr. Donohue noted, in reference to Biden’s continued participation in Catholic sacraments while overtly promoting abortion on demand and other injustices.

In his essay, Donohue cited nine U.S. bishops who have been highly critical of Biden’s situation, several of whom have insisted the president should cease receiving Holy Communion at Mass until he repents of his abortion position.

In his statement Tuesday, Archbishop Lori said that the U.S. bishops “deal daily with the tragic impacts of abortion” and know that “abortion is a violent act which ends the life of preborn children and wounds untold numbers of women.”

“The Catholic Church wishes to continue in our work with our government and leaders to protect the right to life of every human being and to ensure that pregnant and parenting mothers are fully supported in the care of their children before and after birth,” he stated.

God, I Thank Thee That I Am Not Like Devout Catholics

FATHER JERRY POKORSKY| OCTOBER 26, 2022 | 8:52AM EDT
Text Audio
00:0000:00
Font Size
(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

The famous Gospel passage has many applications: “The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, ‘God, I thank thee that I am not like other men, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week, I give tithes of all that I get.’” (Lk. 18:9-14)

 

The Pharisees took sinful pride in abiding by visible religious observances disconnected from virtue, and/or ruined their goodness by taking pride in it. All of us can become Pharisees, especially when we claim “devout Catholic” status, and comply with the external practices of the faith, but pay no attention to authentic Christian virtue.

 

Here are some carefully assembled facts.

 

President Joe Biden

 

President Biden has announced that if Democrats win the House and Senate in the midterm elections this November (2022), the first bill he would send to Congress would codify the so-called abortion rights established by Roe v. Wade.

 

  • He promised he will be “appointing judges that respect foundational precedents like Roe.”
  • He rescinded the pro-life Mexico City Policy, which ensured that foreign aid would not go to organizations that perform or refer for abortions.
  • The Washington Post called Joe Biden a “president who has been called the most pro-transgender in history.”
  • Retired Archbishop Chaput said Biden “is not in communion with the Catholic faith.” The archbishop added that “any priest who now provides Communion to the president participates in his hypocrisy.” Biden attends Mass, receives Communion, has met with the Pope, and has received Communion at papal Masses.

 

Joe Biden identifies as a devout Catholic.

 

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi

 

Nancy Pelosi is pro-abortion, pro-transgender, and pro-gay agenda. Consequently, her archbishop denies her Communion because her politics manifest the scandal of grave unrepented sins. Pelosi ignores the decree. Cardinal Gregory and his two predecessors, Cardinal Wuerl and then-Cardinal McCarrick, have remained unmoved. Cardinal Wuerl said denying Communion according to canon law is not his “pastoral style.” Pelosi attends Mass, receives Communion, has met with the Pope, and has received Communion at papal Masses.

Nancy Pelosi identifies as a devout Catholic.

 

Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra

 

Biden’s Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services supports legislation that:

 

  • Permits partial-birth abortion—killing a baby up until its birthday;
  • Forces every healthcare plan to pay for abortions;
  • Requires pro-life pregnancy centers to advertise abortions;
  • Forces the Little Sisters of the Poor to pay for contraception and abortion drugs; and,
  • Allows assisted suicide.

 

Xavier Becerra identifies as a devout Catholic.

 

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin

 

An official website of the Defense Department reports: “Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III signed a memo today designed to ensure that service members and their families can access reproductive health care [abortion] and to support Department of Defense health care providers concerned about potential risks while providing federally authorized care.” Austin adds, “The Dobbs ruling ‘has impacted access to reproductive health care [abortion], with readiness, recruiting and retention implications for the force.”

NBC News summarizes the details: “The Defense Department [taxpayers] will pick up travel costs for service members and their dependents forced to cross state lines for reproductive healthcare [abortion] needs.”

Lloyd Austin identifies as a devout Catholic.

 

Mariana Mazzucato

 

Among the newest members of the Pontifical Academy for Life appointed by Pope Francis is an outspoken advocate of abortion rights, who shared her opposition to the overturning of Roe v. Wade on Twitter. Italian-American economist Mariana Mazzucato was among seven academics appointed by the Pope on October 15, 2022, to serve five-year terms with the academy.

 

Although Mariana Mazzucato identifies as an atheist, Pope Francis is a devout Catholic and the Vicar of Christ.

The preceding accounts merely report the facts. Now the Gospel application.

 

It’s dangerous to declare devout Catholic status.

 

Jesus indicts the Pharisees and—mutatis mutandis—devout Catholics who claim their devotion as they publicly deny by word and deed the teachings of Jesus through His Church. Let us count the ways (cf. Matthew 23:13–39):

 

  • “But woe to you, devout Catholics, hypocrites! because you shut the kingdom of heaven against men; for you neither enter yourselves nor allow those who would enter to go in.”
  • “Woe to you, devout Catholics, hypocrites! for you traverse sea and land to make a single proselyte, and when he becomes a proselyte, you make him twice as much a child of hell as yourselves.”
  • “Woe to you, devout Catholics, who say, ‘If any one swears by the Church, it is nothing; but if any one swears by friends in the hierarchy, he is bound by his oath.’”
  • “Woe to you, devout Catholics, hypocrites! for you tithe, and have neglected the weightier matters of the law, justice and mercy for the unborn… You blind guides, straining out a gnat and swallowing a camel!”
  • “Woe to you, devout Catholics, hypocrites! for you are like whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within they are full of dead men’s bones and all uncleanness.”
  • “You serpents, you brood of vipers, you devout Catholics, how are you to escape being sentenced to hell? Therefore I send you prophets, some of whom you will disparage as racist and homophobic, and some of you will arrest using FBI swat teams and persecute them from state to state….”

 

Yet, all of those people listed above are potential tax collectors. All they would have to do is say with sincerity, “O God be merciful to me, a sinner,” and make a good Confession. May an ordinary—not a “devout Catholic”—priest be at their bedsides before they cross the threshold to eternity.

 

In the meantime, we may do Pharisaical spiritual posturing of our own:

 

“God, I thank thee that I am not like devout Catholics, woke, inclusive, and advocates of LGBTQ, or even like pro-abortion so-called devout Catholics. I go to Mass on Sunday, say my prayers, and support the Church. I am not particularly devout, but I am a practical Catholic.” I also mind my business, keep my head down, avoid controversy, usually comply, and curse the madness—but only in private.

 

 

[This commentary was first published by Catholic Culture.]

 

--Fr. Jerry Pokorsky is a priest of the Diocese of Arlington who has also served as a financial administrator in the Diocese of Lincoln. Trained in business and accounting, he also holds a Master of Divinity and a Master’s in moral theology. Father Pokorsky co-founded both CREDO and Adoremus, two organizations deeply engaged in authentic liturgical renewal. He writes regularly for a number of Catholic websites and magazines.


Biden Cites God in Predicting Defeat of Pro-Lifers: ‘We’re Going to See What Happens All Over America, God Willing’

CNSNEWS.COM STAFF| OCTOBER 19, 2022 | 5:03PM EDT
Font Size

(Screen Capture)
(Screen Capture)

(CNSNews.com) - President Joe Biden cited God in a speech he delivered on Tuesday night at the Howard Theatre in Washington, D.C.. warning that because of the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v. Wade, Americans will turn out for the November election to defeat pro-life Republicans.

“The Dobbs decision—the Court practically dares women to go ahead and lead and be heard,” said Biden.

“One of the most extraordinary parts of that decision, in my view, was when the majority wrote, quote, ‘Women are not without electoral…’  ‘Are not…’—excuse me—“…are not without electoral or political power.”

“Let me tell you something — [laughs]— the Court and the extreme Republicans who have spent decades trying to overturn Roe are about to find out,” said Biden.

“As they say in one of the towns I grew up, ‘They ain’t seen nothin’ yet,’”  said Biden.

“Just take a look at what happened in Kansas,” he said.

“And come this November, we’re going to see what happens all over America, God willing,” said Biden.

Here is the full text of Biden’s speech:

Remarks by President Biden at a Political Event at the Howard Theatre

President Joe Biden: Well, folks, thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak to you.  Look, Doc, thanks for that introduction. 

And, you know, we’re only 22 days away from the most consequential election in our history, in my view — in recent history at least — elections where the choice and the stakes are crystal clear, especially when it comes to the right to choose.

And on January 22nd, 1973 — I hate to admit this, but I was a freshman — a 30-year-old freshman United States senator, and the Supreme Court issued its opinion on Roe v. Wade, establishing a fundamental constitutional right to choose.

Nearly 50 years later, on June 24th of this year, the Court issued the Dobbs decision.  A woman — and all — all across the country, starting in my house, lost the fundamental right.

I want to remind us all how we felt that day when 50 years of constitutional precedent was overturned —

I’m going to use this mic if it’s okay.

The anger, the worry, the disbelief, the unbelievable fact that for the first time in our history, the Supreme Court didn’t just fail to preserve a constitutional freedom, it actually took away the right that was so fundamental to Americans.  It took away a right.  And the fear that now that most personal decisions may not only be made by the woman and her doctor, but by politicians to make that decision.

The Dobbs decision — the Court practically dares women to go ahead and lead and be heard.

One of the most extraordinary parts of that decision, in my view, was when the majority wrote, quote, “Women are not without electoral…”  “Are not…” — excuse me — “…are not without electoral or political power.”

Let me tell you something — (laughs) — the Court and the extreme Republicans who have spent decades trying to overturn Roe are about to find out.  (Applause.)

As they say in one of the towns I grew up, “They ain’t seen nothin’ yet.”

Just take a look at what happened in Kansas.  (Applause.)  And come this November, we’re going to see what happens all over America, God willing.

You know, it’s only been four months since the Dobbs decision, but we’re no longer have to imagine the chaos and the heartache it’s causing.

In just four months, abortion bans have gone into effect in 16 states; 26.5 million women of reproductive age already live in states subject to these bans.

Today in America, there are women who have been turned away from emergency rooms while having miscarriages, losing wanted pregnancies, and told they need to wait until they’re sicker before they get the care they need.  And there are survivors of rape and incest who’ve been denied access to health services in their home states and been forced to travel to states that do provide that care.

And there’s so much confusion and uncertainty that doctors and nurses fear they could face criminal charges for just doing their job responsibly.

Patients are being denied prescriptions that they’ve been taking for years for conditions like rheumatoid arthritis and oste- — osteoporosis, you know, because pharmacies are concerned that those drugs could also be used to terminate a pregnancy, so they’re not giving them their prescriptions.

That’s not all.  I’ve warned about how this decision risks the broader right to privacy for everyone.  There’s a thing called the Ninth Amendment.  It says there’s a right to privacy.  That’s how it was interpreted back then.

Well, guess what, folks?  That’s because Roe recognized the fundamental right to privacy that has served as a basis for many more rights that are — were — were to come and to take — we’ve taken for granted of late.  And they’re ingrained in the fabric of this country: the right to make a decision — the best decision for your health; the right to birth control — the right that I pushed hard and it finally got changed — the married couples in the privacy of their bedroom.  Excuse me.  The mar- — I’m thinking about the Dobbs — the Dobbs decision.

Imagine — well, I’ll get to that in a second with Clarence Thomas.  (Laughter.)  But the right to marry who you love.  (Applause.)

Look, folks, Justice Thomas said as much in his concurring opinion in Dobbs, writing, quote, “In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold…” — we’re getting to the whole idea of contraception — “…Lawrence and Obergefell.”

Look, folks, meanwhile — and I just want to make clear — I know you all know, but I’ll make sure — they’re talking about the right to use contraception and the right to marry who you love.  I mean —

Anyway, I don’t want to get started.  (Laughter.)

Meanwhile, congressional Republicans are doubling down on their extreme positions.

Kevin McCarthy, the Republican Leader of the House, has said that if they take control of the House, our work is, quote, “far from done.”  He wants the United States Congress to pass a law that would ban abortion nationwide.

Senator —

Well —

Senator Lindsey Graham called for an abortion ban that criminalizes doctors and nurses who provide medical care for their patients in need.

If Republicans get their way with a national ban, it won’t matter where you live in America.  So let me be very clear: If such a bill were to pass in the next several years, I’ll veto it.  (Applause.)  But we can’t let it pass in the first instance. 

Immediately after the Dobbs decision came down, I signed an order and my administration took a number of actions to protect the access to reproductive healthcare, including emergency medical care; to protect a woman’s right to travel from a state that prohibits abortion to a state that allows it; and to protect the privacy of sensitive health information preserving — preventing states from tracking women who are seeking help, because that’s what some will do. 

But as I said when the Dobbs decision — we’re fighting a battle in the courts as well.  But as I’ve said in the Dobbs decision, when it was released, I want to repeat it again: The only sure way to stop these extremist laws that are — put in jeopardy women’s health and rights is for Congress to pass a law.  (Applause.)

And I’ve said before: The Court got Roe right nearly 50 years ago, and I believe Congress should codify Roe once and for all.  (Applause.)

Right now, we’re short a handful of votes.  If you care about the right to choose, then you got to vote.  That’s why, in these midterm elections, it’s so critical to elect more Democratic senators to the United States Senate and more Democrats to keep control of the House of Representatives.  (Applause.)

And, folks, if we do that, here is the promise I make to you and the American people: The first bill that I will send to the Congress will be to codify Roe v. Wade.  (Applause.)  And when Congress passes it, I’ll sign it in January, 50 years after Roe was first decided the law of the land.  (Applause.)

And together, we’ll restore the right to choose for every woman in every state in America.  So, vote.  You got to get out the vote.  We can do this if we vote.  (Applause.)

And, folks, I also have a message for the young people of this nation.  I’ve always believed that this generation is — the young generation represents the best educated, most talented, least prejudiced generation in American history —  (applause) — and that today we face an inflection point, one of those moments that only come around every several generations where there’s so much change happening — technologically, politically, and socially — that the decisions we make now are going to determine the future of our nation and the future of your generation for the next 30 or more years, and it only happens once every five, six generations. 

I know that you may feel like it’s an added burden on top of all you’ve already been through and this young generation, my grandchildren and children, have been through.

I’m not saying you have to shoulder the burden alone.  The task at hand and the task ahead is the work of all of us.  What I am saying is you represent the best of us.  Your generation will not be ignored, will not be shunned, and will not be silent.  Just look at what happens when you speak out. 

Two years ago, perhaps many of you voted for your first time in an election or volunteered for your — work in your first election.  You understood the choices and the stakes.  And because of your experience and power to vote, you elected me President and Kamala Vice President — the highest-ranking woman ever to be elected in American history.  (Applause.)

And since then, with your help, we’ve delivered enormous progress for the nation — the most significant gun safety law in 30 years.  (Applause.)  And, by the way, if you give me a Democratic Congress, we’re going to ban assault weapons again.   I did it once, I’ll do it again.  (Applause.)

And the most significant Infrastructure Law in seven years.  Have us — you know, we ranked up, like, in the 20s, in terms of infrastructure — the United States of America, for God’s sake.

We made the most significant commitment ever in all of history to protect our environment — ever, ever, ever — $360 billion.  (Applause.)

And with your help, we’re forgiving student debt.  (Applause.)  By the way, we really worked hard to get the system right as to how you apply.  Just since yesterday, 4 million more people applied.  (Applause.)

I’m keeping my promise that no one should be in jail merely for using or possessing marijuana.  You should not be in jail.  (Applause.)

Together, making sure our democracy delivers for people, but we know there’s much more progress that needs to be made.  And we know that there remains real options. 

In 2020, you voted and delivered the change you wanted to see in the world.  In 2022, you need to exercise your power to vote again for the future of our nation and the future of your generation. 

So let me close with this.  I’m asking the American people to remember how you felt — how you felt the day the extreme Dobbs decision came down and Roe was overturned after 50 years.  And I’m asking you — and, by the way, it’s not just affecting your gener- — young generation.  It’s affecting children, moms, grandmoms, grandpops, all — the entire generations all the way across the board. 

And I remember asking — I want you to remember that the final say does not rest in the court now; it does not rest with extremist Republicans in Congress — and finally say — finally say, about your right to choose, that it rests with you.  And if you do your part and vote for Democratic leaders in Congress, I promise you we’ll do our part.  I’ll do my part.

And with your support, I’ll sign a law codifying Roe in January.  (Applause.)  

Together, let’s remember who we are.  We are the United States of America, and there’s nothing beyond our capacity.  (Applause.)  So vote, vote, vote! 

God bless you all.  And may God protect our troops.  Thank you. 

I’m sorry — (music plays) —

I was apologizing for my back.  (Music stops playing.)  My mother would be very angry.  I was talking with people with my back to them.  I apologize.  (Laughter.) 

So, thank you all so very, very much.

Exclusive: Chip Roy Leads Letter to Pentagon Demanding Rescission of ‘Abortion Travel Slush Fund’

Chip Roy
Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images
4:01

Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) is leading a letter with 40 other Republicans demanding the Pentagon rescind its new policy to use American taxpayer money to pay for travel and transportation costs of troops seeking out-of-state abortions, Breitbart News has learned first.

“Among several policy changes, this memo directs the unprecedented use of American taxpayer dollars to facilitate abortions for service members and their families, against the wishes of the American people from all walks of life,” the letter to Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin says.

Roy said in a statement to Breitbart News:

The United States military is facing a historic recruiting crisis as a result of wokeness and its strategically foolish COVID shot mandate. The Biden administration’s response is to kill more unborn Americans.

By creating an abortion travel slush fund with hard-earned taxpayer dollars, the Biden Administration is outright mocking the majority of Americans who oppose their tax dollars being used to end life in the womb.

Secretary Austin must immediately rescind this directive; it’s as abhorrent as it is unconscionable. And any Republican who votes to fund or authorize this in December should be asked one simple question: why?”

The Pentagon announced last week that it would pay for the travel and transportation of a service member and their family members seeking abortion if they are stationed in an area where they do not have access to it.

The military healthcare system is prohibited from performing abortions other than in the cast of rape or if the mother’s life is at risk, and military health care does not cover abortions outside of those cases.

However, the Biden Pentagon is attempting to get around those prohibitions by funding the travel and transportation costs of troops and their family members seeking abortions instead of funding the actual abortion procedure.

“This move represents an unprecedented politicization of our Armed Forces, which has unfortunately been a hallmark of the Biden Administration from the start,” the letter says.

It adds:

Your decision to bypass Congress and establish a DoD abortion travel fund flies in the face of nearly a half-century of bipartisan consensus to respect the sincere beliefs of millions of pro-life Americans by restraining the federal government from using taxpayer dollars to fund most abortions. It is even more disgraceful that you are using our brave service members and their families – tasked with providing for our nation’s security – as the vehicle to push this extreme policy on the American public.

The Pentagon’s policy change came just three weeks ahead of the midterm elections, which the Biden administration and Democrats have been attempting to turn into a vote for abortion rights.

“This obvious political gamesmanship will only serve to further undermine Americans’ trust in the U.S. Armed Forces and further hamstring future military recruitment efforts,” the letter said. “We demand the immediate rescission of this unconscionable directive.”

The other Republican signatories of the letter include: Jeff Duncan, Dan Bishop, Michael Cloud, Tim Burchett, Bob Good, Mary E. Miller, Jake Ellzey, Randy K. Weber, Vicky Hartzler, Warren Davidson, Kevin Hern, Louie Gohmert, Lauren Boebert, Clay Higgins, Roger Williams, Diana Harshbarger, Doug Lamborn, Jim Banks, Mike Johnson, W. Gregrory Steube, Gus M. Bilirakis, Ben Cline, Elise M. Stefanik, Burgess Owens, Bruce Westerman, Andy Biggs, Michael Waltz, Brad Finstad, Ralph Norman, Barry Moore, Ann Wagner, Michael Guest, Debbie Lesko, Jack Bergman, John Moonelaar, Bill Posey, Brian Mast, Mark E. Green, Scott Franklin, and Ronny L. Jackson, M.D.

Follow Breitbart News’s Kristina Wong on TwitterTruth Social, or on Fac.


Federally Funded ‘Humanized Mouse Core’ at UCLA Transplanted Fetal Tissue into Mice

MICKY WOOTTEN| NOVEMBER 1, 2022 | 12:57PM EDT
Font Size

(Screenshot)
(Screenshot)

(CNS News) –  A federally funded “Humanized Mouse Core” at the University of California-Los Angeles created “humanized mice” by transplanting human fetal tissue into the mice.

Multiple journal articles published by federally funded researchers working at UCLA have described or summarized how these mice were constructed using tissue taken from human fetuses. Additional journal articles reference UCLA as the provider of humanized mice in studies funded by the National Institutes of Health.

For example, a 2016 article entitled “Propagating Humanized BLT Mice for the Study of Human Immunology and Immunotherapy,” published by Stem Cells and Development and co-authored by multiple UCLA researchers, provides a description of how “humanized BLT mice” are constructed.

“The humanized bone marrow-liver-thymus (BLT) mouse model harbors a nearly complete human immune system, therefore providing a powerful tool to study human immunology and immunotherapy,” says the article’s introduction. “However, its application is greatly limited by the restricted supply of Human CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells and fetal thymus tissues that are needed to generate these mice.”

(Screenshot)
(Screenshot)

The article includes a section carrying the subhead “Generation of humanized BLT Mice.” In explaining the generation of these mice, it says “1–2 fragments of human fetal thymus (~1mm3), as well as donor-matched fetal liver CD34- cells, when available (~4.5x106 ), were implanted under the kidney capsule of each recipient NSG mouse.”

In the “acknowledgements” section, the authors thank “the UCLA AIDS Institute/CFAR Virology Core/Gene and Cell Therapy Core/Humanized Mouse Core for providing human cells/tissues and humanized mice services.”

The authors note that their work “was supported by an UCLA Center for AIDS Research Grant (NIH/NIAID AI028697, to J.Z.),” as well as “a National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director’s New Innovator Award (DP2 CA196335, to L.Y.).”

Another article, published on Jan. 10, 2022 in the journal Nature Communications and entitled “Latency reversal plus natural killer cells diminish HIV reservoir in vivo,” was co-authored by multiple UCLA researchers, as well as researchers from the University of California, Irvine, Stanford University, and a researcher associated with both UCLA and the University of Hong Kong.

The article described research funded by the National Institutes of Health that used “humanized mice” constructed by “the UCLA humanized mouse core” using fetal tissue.

“All mice were maintained in the animal facility at UCLA,” said the article. “All experiments were performed in ethical compliance with the study protocol approved by the UCLA Animal Research Committee.”

“Humanized bone marrow liver thymus (BLT) mice were constructed by the UCLA humanized mouse core using techniques described previously,” it said.

“In brief, NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ or NSG mice or C57BL/6 Rag2−/−γc−/−CD47−/− or TKO mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories and bred at UCLA,” it said.

(Screenshot)
(Screenshot)

“Male and female mice were age-matched and between 6 and 8 weeks old were irradiated with 270 rads, and then pieces of fetal thymus and liver tissue were transplanted under the kidney capsule. Mice were then injected intravenously with 5 × 104 human fetal liver-derived CD34+ cells isolated by immunomagnetic separation.”

The journal article acknowledged the support of the NIH.

“We acknowledge support from the National Institutes of Health (AI155232 to J.T.K., K08CA235525 to C.S.S., AI131294 to J.A.Z. and M.D.M., AI124743 to J.A.Z. and P.A.W., and AI145038 to R.S.) […] and the UCLA Center for AIDS Research (AI28697).”

A page on the NIH Reporter website on the UCLA project, “Defining Factors Controlling HIV Rebound,” that did the research described in this journal article, says the project was funded by the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

The NIAID grant had a “Project Start Date” of Aug. 10, 2017 and a “Project End Date” of July 31, 2022. The NIAID’s “Total Funding’ for the project, according to the NIH Reporter, was $1,540,000.  

One of the sub-projects of “Defining Factors Controlling HIV Rebound,” is called “Mouse Core.”

page on the UCLA Health website briefly describes the division of the Center for AIDS Research that makes humanized mice. It is called “Core D: Humanized Mouse and Gene Therapy.” The brief description says the core “[p]rovides humanized mice, access to BSL2+ vivarium facilities, expertise in humanized mouse models, and further development of improved humanized mouse models.”

Another website maintained by the entire University of California system includes a brief description of what it calls the “UCLA CFAR Humanized Mouse Core.”

“The overall goal of this Core laboratory is to provide the infrastructure, materials, animals, technical expertise and support that will facilitate the use of humanized immunodeficient mice in studies examining the pathogenesis and treatment of HIV-induced disease,” it says.

(Screenshot, Washington Post)
(Screenshot, Washington Post)

“Recent advances have enabled the recapitulation of human immune cell development and function in immunodeficient mice,” it says. “Human hematopoietic tissue is placed in the mice where it undergoes multlineage hematopoiesis into multiple types of human immune cells.  The human tissue utilized in these studies is capable of a high degree of experimental manipulation prior to and subsequent to implantation in the mouse and is further susceptible to infection with HIV. This provides a powerful surrogate in vivo model to examine human hematopoiesis, the pathogenic effects of HIV infection, and ways to protect the human system from HIV.”

The final sentence in this description of the UCLA CFAR Humanized Mouse Core says: “Develop and supply mice and ‘humanized’ mouse models to facilitate progress in HIV/AIDS and oncology based research.” 

The NIH RePorter website lists multiple journal articles associated with the project “Mouse Core” that indicated the program used humanized mice in its federally funded research.

These include:

  1. Characterization of designed, synthetically accessible bryostatin analog HIV latency reversing agents. (July 2018)

“Characterization of designed, synthetically accessible bryostatin analog HIV latency reversing agents,” was published in July of 2018 and funded by multiple NIH grants. On page three, in the Introduction, there is a summary of the use of humanized mice in the study:

“We further established that one particularly efficacious bryolog (SUW133) could induce HIV from latency ex-vivo from CD4 + T cells derived from HIV-infected ART-treated patients and in vivo in humanized BLT mice (Marsden et al., 2017).”

Page 12 includes an additional reference to humanized mice, which also parenthetically cites the same Marsden et al study:

“Subsequently, one particularly potent bryolog termed SUW133 was further tested ex vivo in ART-treated patient-derived cells and in vivo in a humanized mouse model of HIV latency (Marsden et al., 2017), the outcome of which provided further support for this approach and its clinical potential.”

The 2017 Marsden et al. study cited here is called “In vivo activation of latent HIV with a synthetic bryostatin analog effects both latent cell ‘kick’ and ‘kill’ in strategy for virus eradication.” The first author listed in this 2017 study was a researcher at UCLA at the time the article was published.  Three other co-authors are listed as researchers at UCLA. 

(Screenshot)
(Screenshot)

“Humanized bone marrow liver thymus (BLT) mice were constructed by the UCLA humanized mouse core using techniques described previously,” said this article.

“In brief, NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid IL2rgtm1Wjl (Nod-SCID-common gamma chain knockout [NSG]) mice were first irradiated with 270 rads and then transplanted under the kidney capsule with pieces of fetal thymus and liver tissue. Mice were then infused intravenously by retro-orbital injection with 5x105 human fetal liver-derived CD34+ cells isolated by immunomagnetic separation as previously described.”

A footnote in this passage referred to a 2012 journal article, co-authored by the same UCLA researcher, entitled “HIV Latency in the Humanized BLT Mouse,” which explicitly states that BLT mice are made with fetal tissue.

It says,

“Several alternative murine models for HIV infection, including humanized Rag2-/- yc-/- mice (4, 40) and the recently developed BLT (bone marrow-liver-thymus) mouse, now exist. The BLT mouse represents a significant improvement over the SCID-hu (Thy/Liv) mouse by providing robust peripheral reconstitution with multiple human hematopoietic lineages. These BLT mice are produced by transplanting human fetal liver and thymus tissue under the kidney capsule of a nod-SCID-common gamma chain-knockout (NSG) mouse. Endogenous hematopoietic progenitors are then depleted by irradiation or chemical treatment, and new human CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells are introduced by intravenous injection. Human immune cells in BLT mice are present in multiple organs, including the Thy/Liv implant, peripheral blood, lymph nodes, gut, lungs, bone marrow, and liver. Moreover, the human CD4+ cells in these mice can also be infected with HIV.”

In a subsection, “Construction of BLT mice,” it states,

“Fetal tissue for these studies was obtained from either the UCLA CFAR Gene and Cellular Therapy Core or Advanced Biosciences Resources Inc.”

  1. Tracking HIV Rebound following Latency Reversal Using Barcoded HIV (Dec 22, 2020)

Another journal article co-authored by researchers from UCLA (along with researchers from UC Irvine, Stanford, and the School of Medicine at Zhejiang University in Hangzhou, China), also includes references to humanized mice. It is titled “Tracking HIV Rebound following Latency Reversal Using Barcoded HIV.” Published on Dec. 22, 2020, the research cited in this publication was funded by a series of NIH grants (including P01 AI131294 to J.A.Z., CA31845 to P.A.W., AI124763 to M.D., AI124743 to J.A.Z. and P.A.W.).

According to page two of the study:

“These mice were constructed by implanting fetal liver and thymus tissues under the kidney capsule of an immunodeficient (typically Nod-SCID-common gamma chain knockout) mouse, followed by irradiation and then transfusion of hematopoietic stem cells. This results in the generation of multilineage immune reconstitution with human cells including CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. We and others have shown that the BLT mouse model can be efficiently infected with HIV and forms authentic post-integration latency in resting CD4+ T cells.” 

  1. Robust CAR-T memory formation and function via hematopoietic stem cell delivery (Apr 17, 2021)

Another journal article published by UCLA researchers was “Robust CAR-T memory formation and function via hematopoietic stem cell delivery.” It was published on April 17, 2021 and funded by NIH grants (NIH U19AI117941, 1R21AI122390, R01CA239261 to SGK; CIRM DISC2-10748 to SGK; NIH U19AI149504 to SGK and IC, NIH 1R01AI140775 to OOY and SGK; CIRM TR4-06845, NIH P01AI131294 to JAZ; NIH P30AI28697 to UCLA CFAR Virology Core, Gene and Cell Therapy Core, and Humanized Mouse Core); (NIH IRACDA K12 GM106996 to MC; NIH 1R21AI140866 to AZ).

The publication includes an “ethics statement” that reads,

“For humanized mice, all surgeries were performed under ketamine/xylazine and isofluorane anesthesia and all efforts were made to minimize animal pain and discomfort.”

(Screenshot)
(Screenshot)

It also states, “To examine if D1D2CAR also suppresses endogenous TCR expression, we constructed humanized bone marrow-liver-thymus (BLT) mice with HSCs transduced with lentiviral vectors expressing either the CD4CAR or D1D2CAR as described above.”

“Humanized BLT mice,” it said, “were transplanted with donor matched fetal thymus and liver derived HSC (CD34+) transduced with either CD4CAR, D1D2CAR, CD4CAR-41BB, D1D2CAR-41BB, CD4CARCD28 or D1D2CAR-CD28” 

  1. Latency reversal plus natural killer cells diminish HIV reservoir in vivo (Jan 10, 2022)

Another journal article published by UCLA researchers along with researchers from UC Irvine, Stanford, and the University of Hong Kong, was entitled “Latency reversal plus natural killer cells diminish HIV reservoir in vivo.” It was published on Jan. 10, 2022 and funded by NIH grants (NIH AI155232 to J.T.K., K08CA235525 to C.S.S., AI131294 to J.A.Z. and M.D.M., AI124743 to J.A.Z. and P.A.W., and AI145038 to R.S).

A section of this journal article carried the headline, “Methods.” A subsection of this “Methods” section was headlined “Mice.” It states:

“All mice were maintained in the animal facility at UCLA. All experiments were performed in ethical compliance with the study protocol approved by the UCLA Animal Research Committee (ARC # 1996–058). Humanized bone marrow liver thymus (BLT) mice were constructed by the UCLA humanized mouse core using techniques described previously8,61. In brief, NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ or NSG mice or C57BL/6 Rag2−/−γc−/−CD47−/− or TKO mice58 were obtained from Jackson Laboratories and bred at UCLA. Male and female mice were age-matched and between 6 and 8 weeks old were irradiated with 270 rads, and then pieces of fetal thymus and liver tissue were transplanted under the kidney capsule. Mice were then injected intravenously with 5 × 104 human fetal liver-derived CD34+ cells isolated by immunomagnetic separation.”

Despite the multiple references in these journal articles to the use of fetal tissue in the construction of humanized mice, the articles do not indicate whether or not the fetal tissue used to create these mice came from elective abortions.

CNSNews.com repeatedly reached out to UCLA Medical School’s press spokesmen, NIAID spokesman, and the doctors involved with the UCLA humanized mice core and asked, among other things, if any of the fetal tissue used to create these humanized mice came from elective abortions.

Neither UCLA nor NIAID responded.

CNSNews.com specifically asked, “Does any of the fetal tissue used to create the humanized mice in the NIAID-funded UCLA Mouse Core come from elective abortions?”

In 2019, the Congressional Research Service published a report entitled, “Human Fetal Tissue Research: Frequently Asked Question.”  This report states:

“Fetal tissue used in research is mostly obtained from elective (induced) abortions. Though statute (PHISA Section 498A(g)) also permits the collection of human fetal tissue from spontaneous abortions (e.g., miscarriages) or stillbirths for subsequent use in federally funded research, these events often occur during unpredictable circumstances where it is difficult to preserve the tissue for research purposes. In addition, the tissue from spontaneous abortions or stillbirths is more likely to have genetic or other abnormalities that preclude its use for research purposes.”

“background paper” sent by Harvard to the House Energy and Commerce Committee on July 7, 2016 explained why “obtaining fetal material from elective pregnancy termination is far superior to obtaining whatever material might be recoverable following spontaneous miscarriage.” It stated:

“Mice that have human immune systems are an invaluable scientific resource, but these mice are engineered to this condition only by means of the use of human fetal material. … If human fetal tissue is needed, why can it not be obtained from miscarriages instead of abortion? Here, timing is very important.  Almost all miscarriages happen at home or in locations in which fetal material is not recovered and, importantly, preserved in a usable state. Just as obtaining tissue during a scheduled surgery or an in-hospital autopsy soon after death provides tissue that is untainted by decay relative to obtaining those same tissues from the morgue or a funeral home, obtaining fetal material from elective pregnancy termination is far superior to obtaining whatever material might be recoverable following spontaneous miscarriage, even assuming a mechanism existed for the collection of such material.”

(Screenshot)
(Screenshot)

“Fresh fetal tissue or tissue shipped overnight on ice from various organ procurement agencies can be used,” says a 2012 publication authored by a group of UCLA researchers that is titled “Using the BLT Humanized Mouse as a Stem Cell based Gene Therapy Tumor Model.”

The same publication includes a video showing the procedure by which these mice are humanized with fetal tissue.

The UCLA Medical School requires those requesting NIH funding to conduct research with the use of fetal tissue to go through a special approval process. On the UCLA Medical School website, a document called “NIH Proposals with Human Fetal Tissue (HFT)” states that “applications proposing HFT that do not address these requirements will be administratively withdrawn.”

The application form includes a required field that says “if the proposed project involves the use of human fetal tissue obtained from elective abortions (HFT), check ‘Yes’ and complete the rest of the ‘Human Fetal Tissue’ section.”

Applicants who check “Yes,” are then instructed to provide the medical school with the HFT Compliance Assurance, the HFT Sample IRB Consent Form, R & R Budget Form including a Budget Justification, as well as a Research Plan. 

In 2020, the director of UCLA’s Center for AIDS Research told the Washington Post that “work with humanized mice ‘was a flagship technique of ours.’” After the Trump administration issued stricter guidelines on the use of fetal tissue in NIH-funded projects, the same researcher told the Post that he was then reluctant to assign students to projects using humanized mice. “I might not put them on a humanized mouse project,” said the researcher. “Even if the mice were standing in front of you, you can’t do it if the grant says you can’t do it.”

“It is not a small thing,” he told the Post. “My career has been based on using these tissues.”

Under these guidelines, when the UCLA Center for AIDS Research applied to NIH to renew its grant in 2019, the director of the mouse core “made the wrenching decision to leave out the usual request to provide money for the humanized mice.”

Another researcher explained the reasoning behind this decision, saying: “We didn’t want to risk sinking the entire grant.”

 
 

According to the Washington Post, the UCLA Humanized Mouse Core Laboratory “was the first of its kind when it was created in the early 1990s and now provides such mice to 70 scientists on campus and around the country.” Citing one of the UCLA researchers, the Post said that “[a]bout three-fourths of the researchers who buy mice from the lab rely on NIH grants.” 

Under the Biden administration, federally funded fetal tissue research has resumed without the Ethics Advisory Board put into place by the 2019 HHS policy under the Trump administration, reported Forbes.

A new project at UCLA called “Core D-Humanized Mouse and Gene Therapy Core” began on April 8, 2022 and ends on March 31, 2027. The project is funded by NIAID and led by the same researcher who led the previous NIAID-funded mouse core at UCLA.

According to NIH RePorter, “The overall goal of the UCLA-CDU CFAR Humanized Mouse and Gene Therapy (HMGT) Core (Core D) is to provide support and expertise for HIV/AIDS-related research requiring stem cells, gene therapy, and humanized mice for in vitro and in vivo experimentation.” 


No comments: