Friday, May 7, 2010

MEX BILLIONAIRE & NEW YORK TIMES Now Mouthpiece For LA RAZA MEXICAN SUPREMACY

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

FAIRUS.org

JUDICIALWATCH.org


FORMER RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD, LA RAZA DONOR, AND OPEN BORDERS ADVOCATE BILL GATES IS NO LONGER THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD.

THAT SPOT GOES TO MEXICAN BILLIONAIRE CARLOS SLIM WHO OWNS MEXICO’S PHONE MONOPOLY, AND IS QUICKLY BUYING LA RAZA MOUTHPIECE, THE NEW YORK TIMES. NOW YOU CAN CONNECT THE DOTS AS TO WHY THE NEW YORK TIMES SELDOM PUBLISHES ANYTHING ABOUT THE MEXICAN INVASION, OCCUPATION, CRIME TIDAL WAVE, OR EVER EXPANDING MEX WELFARE AND PRISON SYSTEMS!

THE NEW YORK TIMES IS MOUTHPIECE FOR LA RAZA “THE RACE” AND THE FOR MEXICAN SUPREMACY.

SEE ARTICLE AT BOTTOM FROM CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR ON HOW MEXICO EXPORTS THEIR POOR, ILLITERATE, CRIMINAL AND TYPICALLY PREGNANT. WE ARE MEXICO’S WELFARE, PRISON AND EMPLOYMENT SYSTEM!


*

Slim has his pickings

By KEITH J. KELLY

Last Updated: 4:08 AM, May 7, 2010
Posted: 12:36 AM, May 7, 2010


MEXICAN billionaire Carlos Slim is wheeling and dealing his way through the media world.
According to people familiar with the matter, Slim is sinking more money into The New York Times Co., doubling his current 7 percent stake, while also visiting the offices of Newsweek, the Washington Post-owned newsweekly that was put up for sale earlier this week.
The expanded investment in the Times makes Slim its largest independent shareholder, after the previous biggest shareholder, Phil Falcone's hedge fund Harbinger Capital, sold 4.75 million shares last month.
Slim already has deep ties to the Times as a result of his $250 million, high-interest loan to the company in January 2009 and the warrants he holds that enable him to buy up to 18 percent of the company's common stock.
The Times declined to comment. Slim did not respond to a request for comment.
At the same time that he's getting in deeper with the Times, sources said Slim also met with Newsweek executives on Wednesday.
Slim's visit adds to the intrigue surrounding a comment made earlier this week by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham, who said that once word began to circulate that the magazine he runs was for sale, he received phone calls from two billionaires interested in buying the title.
According to people familiar with the matter, Slim was not one of those billionaires.
Slim's apparent interest in Newsweek would represent a reversal of fortune for a magazine that some watchers predicted would be difficult to sell.
The title has struggled, losing $28.1 million last year, after slashing by more than 1 million the number of copies it promises advertisers it will sell, known as the rate base.
Compounding matters has been a redesign that moved the magazine away from covering breaking news to mimic The Economist in style, but failed to connect with readers.
The Washington Post said it would not comment on the sale until the process was complete.

* MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

EXPORTING POVERTY... we take MEXICO'S 38 million poor, illiterate, criminal and frequently pregnant

........ where can we send AMERICA'S poor?


The Mexican Invasion................................................
Mexico prefers to export its poor, not uplift them

March 30, 2006 edition

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0330/p09s02-coop.html

Mexico prefers to export its poor, not uplift them
At this week's summit, failed reforms under Fox should be the issue, not US actions.

By George W. Grayson WILLIAMSBURG, VA.

At the parleys this week with his US and Canadian counterparts in Cancún, Mexican President Vicente Fox will press for more opportunities for his countrymen north of the Rio Grande. Specifically, he will argue for additional visas for Mexicans to enter the United States and Canada, the expansion of guest-worker schemes, and the "regularization" of illegal immigrants who reside throughout the continent. In a recent interview with CNN, the Mexican chief executive excoriated as "undemocratic" the extension of a wall on the US-Mexico border and called for the "orderly, safe, and legal" northbound flow of Mexicans, many of whom come from his home state of Guanajuato. Mexican legislators share Mr. Fox's goals. Silvia Hernández Enriquez, head of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations for North America, recently emphasized that the solution to the "structural phenomenon" of unlawful migration lies not with "walls or militarization" but with "understanding, cooperation, and joint responsibility." Such rhetoric would be more convincing if Mexican officials were making a good faith effort to uplift the 50 percent of their 106 million people who live in poverty. To his credit, Fox's "Opportunities" initiative has improved slightly the plight of the poorest of the poor. Still, neither he nor Mexico's lawmakers have advanced measures that would spur sustained growth, improve the quality of the workforce, curb unemployment, and obviate the flight of Mexicans abroad. Indeed, Mexico's leaders have turned hypocrisy from an art form into an exact science as they shirk their obligations to fellow citizens, while decrying efforts by the US senators and representatives to crack down on illegal immigration at the border and the workplace. What are some examples of this failure of responsibility? • When oil revenues are excluded, Mexico raises the equivalent of only 9 percent of its gross domestic product in taxes - a figure roughly equivalent to that of Haiti and far below the level of major Latin American nations. Not only is Mexico's collection rate ridiculously low, its fiscal regime is riddled with loopholes and exemptions, giving rise to widespread evasion. Congress has rebuffed efforts to reform the system. Insufficient revenues mean that Mexico spends relatively little on two key elements of social mobility: Education commands just 5.3 percent of its GDP and healthcare only 6.10 percent, according to the World Bank's last comparative study. • A venal, "come-back-tomorrow" bureaucracy explains the 58 days it takes to open a business in Mexico compared with three days in Canada, five days in the US, nine days in Jamaica, and 27 days in Chile. Mexico's private sector estimates that 34 percent of the firms in the country made "extra official" payments to functionaries and legislators in 2004. These bribes totaled $11.2 billion and equaled 12 percent of GDP. • Transparency International, a nongovernmental organization, placed Mexico in a tie with Ghana, Panama, Peru, and Turkey for 65th among 158 countries surveyed for corruption. • Economic competition is constrained by the presence of inefficient, overstaffed state oil and electricity monopolies, as well as a small number of private corporations - closely linked to government big shots - that control telecommunications, television, food processing, transportation, construction, and cement. Politicians who talk about, much less propose, trust-busting measures are as rare as a snowfall in the Sonoran Desert. Geography, self-interests, and humanitarian concerns require North America's neighbors to cooperate on myriad issues, not the least of which is immigration. However, Mexico's power brokers have failed to make the difficult decisions necessary to use their nation's bountiful wealth to benefit the masses. Washington and Ottawa have every right to insist that Mexico's pampered elite act responsibly, rather than expecting US and Canadian taxpayers to shoulder burdens Mexico should assume.

No comments: