Saturday, May 15, 2010

RASMUSSEN POLLS: 70% of Massachusetts Favor Ban On Benefits Illegals AS CALIFORNIA PAYS OUT $20 BILLION PER YEAR!

70% IN MASSACHUSETTS FAVOR BAN ON PUBLIC BENEFITS FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


WOULD THE PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA BE MORE LIKELY TO SUPPORT ARIZONA IF THEY KNEW HOW MUCH THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE of CALIFORNIA COSTS? OR IF THEY KNEW OF THE STAGGERING MEXICAN CRIME TIDAL WAVE GANGS COST? OR IF THEY KNEW OF THE NUMBER OF ILLEGALS OUT VOTING FOR HISPANDERING LA RAZA “THE RACE” POLITICIANS AND THE EVER GROWING POWER OF THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of AMERICA – LA RAZA “THE RACE”????

*
THIS IS CALIFORNIA UNDER MEXICAN OCCUPATION. ALL THAT “CHEAP” LABOR THE LA RAZA DEMS INVITE IN IS STAGGERINGLY EXPENSIVE!

*

California is nearly destroyed by the Mexican OCCUPATION, AND EVER EXPANDING MEXICAN WELFARE AND PRISON SYSTEMS!

Even though more than 2000 Californians have been MURDERED BY ILLEGALS THAT FLED BACK TO MEXICO TO AVOID PROSECUTION, the LA RAZA DEMS, Feinstein, Boxer, Pelosi, Lofgren, Eshoo, Waxman, and Farr, along with the LA RAZA FASCIST Reps. Becerra, Baca, Sanchez sisters, have all worked tirelessly to sabotage EXISTING LAWS and expand MEXICAN SUPREMACY.

*
California is now a state overrun by illegals, and many of them are voting LA RAZA FASCIST PARTY.

The State of California pays out $20 billion a year to illegals in social services!
There are only eight (8) states with a larger population than LOS ANGELES COUNTY, which under Mexican occupation pays out $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS!
*
Other counties, such as Mexican occupied San Bernardino, home of LA RAZA PARTY and MEXICAN RACIST, Rep. Joe Baca, also has soaring WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS, AS WELL AS STAGGERING MEXICAN GANG VIOLENCE.

*
The same county as a tax-free Mexican economy calculated to be over $2 billion per year!
The county pays out hundreds of millions to keep some of the Mexican criminals in jails, while Mexican gangs murder 500 – 1,000 people yearly! These cost the county nearly one million each to prosecute!

*
Just Mexican graffiti abatement in Los Angeles cost $10 million per year.
Los Angeles is a “sanctuary” city, which means LAWS DON’T APPLY TO ILLEGALS, OR THE EMPLOYERS OF ILLEGALS! Here, 47% of those employed are ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS. It is not atypical to go into any major chain store, fast food, or service business and not find an employee that can speak ANY ENGLISH!
The State of California now has the WORST EDUCATION system in the country due to cuts in education programs to pay for the MEXICAN WELFARE STATE, as well as the Mexicans loathing for English and literacy.

*
WHILE NANCY PELOSI doesn’t have a word to say about CALIFORNIA’S STAGGERING UNEMPLOYMENT, FORECLOSURES, MEXICAN GANG VIOLENCE, she hispanders endlessly. Pelosi has vowed the WALL WITH NARCOMEX will not ever be built. Obama has stopped the wall, taken hundreds of border guards off the borders even as he has repeatedly lied that “border security” is the hallmark of his AMNESTY! But then he and Pelosi LIED about illegals not being in their OBAMACARE!

*
NANCY PELOSI HAS LONG ILLEGALLY HIRED ILLEGALS AT HER NAPA WINERY.
DIANNE FEINSTEIN HAS LONG ILLEGALLY HIRED ILLEGALS AT HER S.F. HOTEL.
Feinstein and Boxer have twice attempted a “special amnesty” for 1.5 MILLION ILLEGAL FARM WORKERS, despite CA staggering unemployment, and the fact that one-third of all “cheap” labor exploited farm workers end up on welfare. FEINSTEIN BOXER HAVE LONG TAKEN BIG BRIBES FROM BIG AG BIZ DONORS THAT

*
PERHAPS THE REASON WHY ONLY 44% OF CALIFORNIANS FAVOR A LAW LIKE ARIZONA, IS BECAUSE 60% OF THE STATE IS NOW ILLEGAL! AND THE VAST NUMBER OF EMPLOYERS HIRE ILLEGALS!

*


44% in California Favor Law Like Arizona’s, 48% Oppose
Saturday, May 15, 2010
Forty-four percent (44%) of Likely Voters in California favor a law like the one just adopted in Arizona that requires police to check the immigration status of those they stop if they suspect them of being illegal immigrants.
But a new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey in the state finds that slightly more (48%) oppose such a law.
Nationally, 59% support a law like Arizona’s.
Sixty-four percent (64%) of voters in California are at least somewhat concerned that a law like this will violate the civil rights of some U.S. citizens. This includes 44% who are Very Concerned. Thirty-four percent (34%) are not very or not at all concerned about this.
Critics of Arizona’s law, like the Los Angeles City Council which has voted to boycott the state, complain that it is racial profiling. Supporters in Arizona say the law is needed because the federal government is not enforcing immigration law.
(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.
This statewide telephone survey of 500 Likely Voters in California was conducted on May 12, 2010 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/-4.5 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.
Most California voters (54%) favor a welcoming immigration policy that excludes only national security threats, criminals and those who are coming to live off the welfare system. This compares to 58% nationally.
Twenty-six percent (26%) in California disagree with a policy that has that goal, and 20% more are not sure.
Fifty-one percent (51%) of male voters in California favor a law like Arizona’s, but 52% of female voters are opposed.
Seventy-six percent (76%) of Republicans like the law that cracks down on illegal immigration. Sixty-seven percent (67%) of Democrats and 55% of voters not affiliated with either party oppose it.
Democrats and unaffiliateds are also much more concerned about possible civil rights violations against U.S. citizens.
Republicans are more strongly in favor of an immigration policy with the goal of excluding only national security threats, criminals and those who come to live off welfare.
Embattled Democratic incumbent Barbara Boxer remains in a virtual tie with Republican challenger Tom Campbell, but two other GOP hopefuls are still failing to gain traction in California’s race for the U.S. Senate.
Please sign up for the Rasmussen

*
Importance of Issues
Immigration Jumps In Importance, But Economy, Corruption Still Top Voter Issues
Thursday, May 13, 2010
Email to a Friend ShareThis
Advertisement

The number of U.S. Voters who view the issue of Immigration as Very Important has jumped 16 points from last month to its highest level ever, although it still ranks fifth on a list of 10 issues regularly tracked by Rasmussen Reports.
The latest national telephone survey of Likely Voters finds that 63% view immigration as Very Important in the wake of the national debate that has erupted over Arizona's new law requiring local police to check the immigration status of those they stop who they suspect of being illegal immigrants. Critics say the law is racial profiling; Arizona officials say the law is needed because the federal government does not enforce existing immigration law.
Still, 83% place government ethics and corruption at the top of the list, while just as many (83%) feel that way about the economy. Last month, government ethics and corruption edged the economy for only the second time in two years of regular tracking. The first time was in September of last year.
Although voters trust Republicans more than Democrats on eight out of the 10 key issues, most are not sure which party to trust when it comes to government ethics and corruption. On the economy, voters trust Republicans over Democrats, 43% to 39%. As for immigration, the GOP holds a slight 41% to 38% edge.
Republican candidates now have a six-point lead over Democrats in the latest edition of the Generic Congressional Ballot, matching the narrowest gap between the two parties this year.
(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.
The survey of 1,000 Likely U.S. Voters was conducted on May 6-7 & 11, 2010 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.
Sixty-eight percent (68%) of voters view national security and the War on Terror as Very Important, up 10 points from last month.
Nearly as important is the issue of health care, viewed as Very Important by 66% of voters. Following passage of the health care reform bill in March, the number of voters who felt this way also jumped 10 points - to 72%. It now appears to be returning to levels found before the passage of the bill.
The number of voters who expect the health care bill to increase the federal deficit is at its highest level yet, and most voters continue to favor its repeal.
Sixty-four percent (64%) of voters view Social Security as Very Important. This finding has remained relatively steady since late December 2009. Only 39% of voters are even somewhat confident that the Social Security system will pay them all of their promised benefits.
After Social Security is education, deemed very important by 63% of voters, showing little change from early April.
Thirty-eight percent (38%) of Americans believe aiding low income students is a more important role for the federal government in education than helping the best and brightest students. Twenty-nine percent (29%) disagree. Meanwhile, most Americans still consider being a teacher one of the most important jobs in the country today, but only one-out-of-four consider teaching a desirable profession to go into.
Fifty-eight percent (58%) feel that the issue of taxes is very important, a finding that has shown little fluctuation since the end of February 2009.
Sixty-six percent (66%) think America is overtaxed, and only 18% are willing to pay higher taxes to lower the federal budget deficit.
Abortion and the war in Iraq are essentially tied for last place. Forty-two percent (42%) rate abortion as Very Important, and 45% feel this way about the Iraqi war. While the number of voters who feel this way about abortion shows no change from last month, the war in Iraq is up eight points, in terms of importance from a month ago.

*
70% IN MASSACHUSETTS FAVOR BAN ON PUBLIC BENEFITS FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
70% in Massachusetts Favor Ban on Public Benefits For Illegal Immigrants
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Email to a Friend ShareThis
Advertisement

Seventy percent (70%) of Massachusetts voters favor a proposal recently rejected by the state legislature that would stop illegal immigrants from receiving public benefits.
A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey shows that just 17% oppose the proposal to prevent illegal immigrants from gaining access to public housing, unemployment benefits, welfare or workers compensation. Thirteen percent (13%) more are not sure.
The proposal failed to pass in the Democratically-controlled State House last month by a 75 to 82 vote.
Fifty percent (50%) of voters in Massachusetts oppose a boycott of Arizona like the one just passed by Boston City Council to protest that state’s new law cracking down on illegal immigration. Thirty-four percent (34%) favor such a boycott, while another 16% are undecided.
But just 41% favor a law like Arizona’s that empowers local police to stop anyone they suspect of being an illegal immigrant. Forty-eight percent (48%) oppose such a law. Eleven percent (11%) are not sure.
Nationally, 58% support a law like the one recently adopted in Arizona.
(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.
The survey of 500 Likely Voters in Massachusetts was conducted on May 10, 2010 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 4.5 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.
Sixty-seven percent (67%) of Bay State voters are at least somewhat concerned that a law like Arizona’s might violate the civil rights of some U.S. citizens while 30% don’t share that concern. Those figures include 40% who are Very Concerned and 11% who are Not At All Concerned.
Fifty-eight percent (58%) favor a welcoming immigration policy that only excludes “national security threats, criminals and those who would come here to live off our welfare system.” Just 23% disagree with such a policy. This is comparable to findings among voters nationwide.
Governor Deval Patrick yesterday criticized the public benefits proposal and denounced the Arizona bill, saying he would veto a similar law if passed by the state legislature. However, he also said the state would not follow Boston’s example and divest state funds from Arizona as a protest.
His two chief opponents for governor, Republican Charlie Banker and Democrat-turned-independent Tim Cahill, both favor the legislation barring illegal immigrants from public benefits. Cahill has defended the Arizona law; Baker has not commented in detail on it.
Patrick now earns 45% of the vote in his bid for reelection to Baker’s 31% and Cahill’s 14%.
Republicans and voters not affiliated with either party overwhelmingly support the proposal that would stop illegal immigrants from getting public benefits, as do 53% of Democrats.
But 52% of Democratic voters favor a boycott of Arizona, while 74% of Republicans and 66% of unaffiliateds oppose it.
When it comes to having a law like Arizona’s, however, 64% of GOP voters are in favor of it, but 68%of Democrats are opposed. Among unaffiliated voters in Massachusetts, 46% favor such a law, while 39% oppose it.

No comments: