Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Does Obama Hate Americans As Much As His Actions Suggest?

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com




NEW TEXAS GOV, RICK PERRY MOVES AGAINST MEX INVASION AND OCCUPATION!



“SANCTUARY CITIES” IN TEXAS, WHERE ILLEGALS ARE ABOVE THE LAW AN “EMERGENCY ITEM”. Perhaps Perry knows what Mexifornia has turned into as a “sanctuary state” where the laws against hiring illegals, illegals voting, illegals climbing the CA border for “free” anchor baby birthing, education, and AMERICAN JOBS has done!!!



*

CALIFORNIA IS IN MELTDOWN with little hope for resolution as that state’s new gov, JERRY BROWN, and it’s lifer senator BARBARA BOXER were both elected by LA RAZA, the MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY for MEX SUPREMACY!



Lou Dobbs Tonight

Monday, February 11, 2008

In California, League of United Latin American Citizens has adopted a resolution to declare "California Del Norte" a sanctuary zone for immigrants. The declaration urges the Mexican government to invoke its rights under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo "to seek third nation neutral arbitration of disputes concerning immigration laws and their enforcement." We’ll have the story.

*

Lou Dobbs Tonight

Wednesday, June 10, 2009



Gov. Schwarzenegger said California is facing “financial Armageddon”. He is making drastic cuts in the budget for education, health care and services. But there is one place he isn’t making cuts… services for illegal immigrants. These services are estimated to cost the state four to five billion dollars a year. Schwarzenegger said he is “happy” to offer these services. We will have a full report tonight.

*

CA OPERATES IN DEFICIT OF $28 BILLION, AND STILL PAYS OUT IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS $20 BILLION. LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE PAYS OUT $600 MILLION TO ILLEGALS ON WELFARE… You wondered why the illegals head to CA first, before spreading out, along with Mex gangs and their crime wave, all over the nation???



PERRY MOVES ON ILLEGALS ABOVE THE LAW! WHERE DOES ANYONE GO THAT THEY ARE NOT ASKED FOR AN I.D.? MEXICO, LA RAZA, THE LA RAZA DEMS IN CONGRESS ALL SAY NO TO THAT SO THAT MEX SUPREMACY PREVAILS IN SANCTUARY CITIES WHERE JOBS GO FIRST TO ILLEGALS!



*



OBAMA’S HISPANDERING AGENDA IS ENDLESS AMNESTY DEVICES, THE CURRENT BE INTRODUCED BY REP. JOE BACA, OF CA, A KNOWN RABIDLY RACIST MEX SUPREMACIST WHOSE DISTRICT HAS A SOARING NUMBER OF MEX GANGS, AND MEXICANS ON WELFARE (SEE BACA’S COMMENTS AT A LA RAZA CONVENTION BELOW)





While Mr. Perry doesn’t want to copy Arizona’s immigration law, he said during the campaign that he understood the sentiment that led to it, and that Texas should step in and protect its borders if the federal government won’t.



HISPANDERING OBAMA WINS NO MATTER. HE WILL PERPETRATE A BUNDLE OF AMNESTIES, LIKE HE DID HIS OBAMACARE, WHICH HE LIED ON THE SENATE FLOOR THAT IT DID NOT INCLUDE ILLEGALS, WHEN IN FACT IT SURE ENOUGH DOES, OR HE WILL CONTINUE HIS PROGRAM OF OPEN-BORDERS, NON-ENFORCEMENT, LIES TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO IMPRESS HIS HISPANIC ILLEGAL CONSTITUENTS, AND…. ASSAULT LEGALS, AS OBAMA HAS DONE TO ARIZONA!

“The Obama administration will sue Arizona for trying to help Washington enforce federal immigration laws, but flatly rejects the notion of suing sanctuary cities that blatantly defy those same laws. That announcement two weeks ago revealed the hypocrisy and utter contempt for the rule of law rampant in Eric Holder’s Justice Department.”





*

TEXAS LEGISLATURE TO MOVE AGAINST MEX OCCUPATION… you won’t find this happening in MEXIFORNIA! WHERE EVERY DEM IS BEHOLDING TO THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES, AND THE MEX FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA IS AS POWERFUL AS THE VARIOUS SPECIAL INTERESTS CA LEGISLATORS ALSO REPRESENT.



SEN. FEINSTEIN and BOXER, HAVE LONG BEEN LA RAZA DEMS, AND PUSH FOR ANY AND ALL DEVICES TO ADD MORE ILLEGALS EVEN AS CA’s UNEMPLOYMENT SOARS FOR LEGALS! THEY RECENTLY PUSHED TO ADD ILLEGALS TO SOCIAL SECURITY AND THEN THE FOLLOWING WEEK MOVED TO CUT BENEFITS TO HELP PAY FOR THE STAGGERING LOSES THEIR BANKSTERS HAVE CAUSED. FEINSTEIN HAS LONG TAKEN BIG MONEY FROM LA RAZA DONORS, BANKSTERS WELLS FARGO and BANK of AMERICA, BOTH OF WHICH OPEN BANK ACCOUNTS FOR ILLEGALS, SERVE THE MEX DRUG CARTELS AS BANKSTERS, AND MADE MILLIONS OFF MORTGAGES THEY CREATED FOR ILLEGALS WITH STOLE, OR FRAUDULENT DOCUMENTATION….! CONNECTING THE DOTS IS NOT HARD WHEN IT COMES TO THESE CORRUPT WOMEN, AND THEIR ENDLESS PUSH FOR OPEN BORDERS, AMNESTY, NO E-VERIFY AND…. NO I.D. TO VOTE!



*

*



January 15, 2011

Perry Puts Immigration Atop Session’s Agenda

By ROSS RAMSEY

Ross Ramsey, the managing editor of The Texas Tribune, writes a regular column.

Three reasons Gov. Rick Perry declared sanctuary cities an “emergency item” for the Texas Legislature: A nativist electorate, a reluctance to mimic Arizona on immigration law and the closing commercial in his campaign for re-election last year.

Here’s one more: The first 60 days of a legislative session offer the governor a moment of control over the agenda, and he has decided to point the spotlight, for now, on immigration and property rights, the second issue he declared to be an emergency. He hasn’t done it yet, but passing voter photo ID is a good bet for the next act in the center ring.

The governor is, in effect, alone on the stage. Lawmakers can’t deliberate on bills for the first 60 days of the 140-day session unless he says so, by declaring emergencies. They don’t have to be emergencies, necessarily, but the process allows lawmakers to handle pressing business, while letting the governor drive the agenda during the session’s first weeks. For Mr. Perry, it’s a chance to deal with immigration matters before the budget, redistricting and other issues claim the limelight.

Mr. Perry’s focus on sanctuary cities — those that do not allow their police officers to enforce federal immigration laws — could offer him safe passage through the contentious immigration debate. Arizona wants its police to question the immigration status of anyone they suspect is in the country illegally. Mr. Perry wouldn’t require police to ask, but would allow it.

It’s a fine distinction for a Republican Party trying to win favor with Hispanics while quelling a rebellion from nativist conservatives. Mr. Perry wants to answer the anger of the second group without stoking it in the first.

In the governor’s race, he and Bill White battled over whether Houston was a sanctuary city while Mr. White was mayor. Houston never had an official edict from its City Council or mayor, but the police followed a general order against asking about the citizenship of people who hadn’t been arrested (they did run immigration checks after arrests).

Some, including many police chiefs, argue that asking for papers all the time gets in the way of regular police work and makes it harder for officers to win the trust of citizens whose help is needed to fight crime. Mr. Perry hit that note in a statement last April, rejecting the Arizona standard because “some aspects of the law turn law enforcement officers into immigration officials by requiring them to determine immigration status during any lawful contact with a suspected alien, taking them away from their existing law enforcement duties, which are critical to keeping citizens safe.” The Texas Department of Public Safety’s policy under Mr. Perry is remarkably similar to Houston’s and other big cities in the state.

The argument stopped there, for a while. Then Mr. Perry closed his campaign with a television ad featuring Sgt. Joslyn Johnson, a Houston police officer whose husband, Rodney, also a police officer, was killed by an illegal immigrant during a traffic stop. This being a political ad, it blamed Mr. White’s policies as mayor for that death.

While Mr. Perry doesn’t want to copy Arizona’s immigration law, he said during the campaign that he understood the sentiment that led to it, and that Texas should step in and protect its borders if the federal government won’t. So the policy and the politics don’t exactly match up. He has got to do something — he campaigned on it — but doesn’t want to do what Arizona did.

If he doesn’t jump in, the Legislature surely will. By the end of the week, lawmakers had already filed 30 bills with the word “immigration” in them, including legislation that would require police officers to inquire into the immigration status of people they’ve arrested. That’s before you get to the goodies like anchor babies, state services for non-citizens, immigration records of public school students and sanctuary cities; this, along with the budget and redistricting, is front and center this session.

Mr. Perry and his aides can’t or won’t name any sanctuary cities, but the governor said he was going to make it illegal to be one. He said last week that there were cities that had “made decisions to be havens for those who are either in conflict with federal immigration laws, or state laws, and we’re going to prohibit that.

“We’ll have a good and open discussion about what we’re going to prohibit,” he said, “and if the shoe is fitting you, then you might not want to be wearing it.”

It’s a potentially treacherous issue, and for now, that’s as specific as he’s going to get.

*

WHERE LA RAZA MEX SUPREMACY IS SPREADING FASTEST



Hans A. von Spakovsky

Law-Enforcement-Free Sanctuaries



The Obama administration will sue Arizona for trying to help Washington enforce federal immigration laws, but flatly rejects the notion of suing sanctuary cities that blatantly defy those same laws. That announcement two weeks ago revealed the hypocrisy and utter contempt for the rule of law rampant in Eric Holder’s Justice Department.

It was the latest example of the Department letting partisan politics, rather than the interests of justice and the impartial enforcement of the law, drive its legal decisions. In this instance, it both threatens national security and undermines public confidence in our legal system.

The very weakness of the Department’s legal arguments in the Arizona suit betrays its political genesis. As the brief filed on behalf of Arizona by nine other states persuasively argues, Arizona is not interfering with federal authority: it has neither created new categories of aliens nor attempted to independently determine the immigration status of aliens. Arizona’s law simply requires local law enforcement officers to check the immigration status of individuals arrested for other reasons. This is exactly the regulatory scheme of concurrent enforcement envisioned by federal immigration law.

The Justice Department’s suit directly contradicts the 2005 Supreme Court decision in Muehler v. Mena. In that case, all nine justices upheld the right of local police officers to question a detained individual’s immigration status while a search warrant was being executed. The suit also flies in the face of Estrada v. Rhode Island, in which the First Circuit Court of Appeals this February upheld a state trooper’s questioning of immigration status during a traffic stop. This is the exact policy being implemented in Arizona.

Federal courts have long upheld the power of state law enforcement officers to arrest those who violate federal law, as long as it is also a violation of state law, includingimmigration laws. The inherent authority of local police to arrest immigration violators was outlined in 2002 in a legal memorandum issued by the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel. Yet Attorney General Holder has filed a lawsuit making claims completely at odds with an opinion issued by his own department.

Holder’s suit also conflicts directly with federal immigration law. The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. §1373) specifically mandates that no federal, state, or local government can “prohibit, or in any way restrict, any government entity or official from sending to, or receiving from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service [now Immigration and Customs Enforcement or ICE], information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual,” a provision upheld by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in 1999. Congress wanted local governments to get information on immigration status from the federal government – and that is exactly what the Arizona law requires for anyone arrested in the state. Yet Holder is trying to prevent Arizona officials from checking “the citizenship or immigration status” of “any individual.”

Now we’re awaiting a ruling by a federal judge on the Justice Department’s request for a temporary injunction to stop the law from going into effect on Thursday. It’s clear, though, that the only way that judge could possibly rule in the Department’s favor is by ignoring the law and this precedent.

Justice Department spokesman Tracy Schmaler asserts that Arizona is “actively” interfering with federal law while sanctuary cities are just not using their resources to enforce federal law. This bogus claim displays fundamental ignorance of these federal legal requirements. Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the ranking Republican on the House Judiciary committee and the chief author of the 1996 immigration law, rightly calls it “absurd.” Cities like San Francisco not only do not enforce federal immigration laws, some violate it by protecting aliens from deportation and refusing to cooperate with or provide information to immigration officials.

As the nine states note in their brief, the Justice Department is trying to negate the “preexisting power of the States to verify a person’s immigration status and similarly seeks to reject the assistance that the States can lawfully provide to the Federal government.” Holder’s claim that Arizona is interfering with federal power to regulate immigration is near frivolous.

Arizona simply requires that law enforcement personnel (1) ascertain the immigration status of people they have lawfully detained for some other reason and (2) report to the federal government the presence of any detainee determined to be here illegally. If the Obama administration wants to ignore that information and reject that assistance, it has that option. The only possible “interference” with federal power is the risk that the feds might be publicly embarrassed by a policy of non-enforcement. Apparently the White House and DOJ consider embarrassment a federal offense.

Holder makes one further -- yet equally absurd -- claim: that by trying to deter the movement of illegal aliens into Arizona, the state is restricting interstate commerce and thus violates the Commerce Clause. How can deterring the entry of people who have no legal right to enter possibly violate interstate commerce? It is the same as saying that -- notwithstanding federal laws that bar importation of heroin -- a state that busts heroin traffickers is flouting the Commerce Clause.

Federal law stipulates that any person who “conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection,” an illegal alien is committing a crime. It is also criminal just to “encourage” residence by illegal aliens. Yet sanctuary cities like San Francisco have enacted formal policies that embrace all these illegal acts. Such policies lead directly to further crimes, such as the vicious murder of a father and his two sons on a San Francisco street. The killer was an illegal alien with two prior felony convictions -- yet on neither occasion did San Francisco authorities notify the feds of his presence. Had they done so, he would not have been able to gun down Tony Bologna, 48, and his sons Michael, 20, and Matthew, 16, as they sat in their car on June 16, 2008.

Holder’s refusal to sue sanctuary cities is an abrogation of his responsibility as the nation’s chief federal law enforcement officer. Unlike Arizona, many of these cities have policies that violate federal law.

The Obama administration claims Arizona’s law will “disrupt federal immigration enforcement.” But the only thing it could possibly disrupt is federal non-enforcement. As the elections approach, Holder’s suit may help gin up enthusiasm among the president’s more radical political allies, such as La Raza. But using the law enforcement powers of the federal government to achieve political ends is a dangerous abuse of power.

*

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

FAIRUS.org

JUDICIALWATCH.org

ALIPAC.us

*

FROM JUDICIAL WATCH ON REP. JOE BACA, MEX FASCIST



“Not surprisingly, Baca has a long history of opposing measures to curb illegal immigration. He voted against the U.S.-Mexico border fence, a bill requiring hospitals to report illegal immigrants before getting reimbursed by the government to treat them and a law that extends illegal immigrants’ stay in the U.S. while pursuing residency.”



*

“THE LATINOS ARE COMING... THE LATINOS ARE COMING!!! AND THEY’RE GOING TO VOTE!” JOE BACA (MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA)

THE LONG HISTORY OF BACA’S LA RAZA RACISM





8. Joe Baca, former CA Assemblymember, currently member of Congress at Latino Summit Response to Prop 187 UC Riverside 1/1995 and Southwest Voter Registration Project annual conference in Los Angeles, 6/1996 "We need more Latinos out there. We must stand up and be counted. We must be together, We must be united. Because if we're not united you know what's going to happen? We're like sticks - we're broken to pieces. Divided we're not together. But as a unit they can't break us. So we've got to come together, and if we're united, si se puede (it can be done) and we will make the changes that are necessary. But we've got to do it. We've got to stand together, and dammit, don't let them divide us because that's what they want to do, is to divide us. And once we're divided we're conquered. But when we look out at the audience and we see, you know, la familia, La Raza (the family, our race), you know, it's a great feeling, isn't it a good feeling? And you know, I started to think about that and it reminded me of a book that we all read and we all heard about, you know, Paul Revere, and when he was saying, 'The British are coming, the British are coming!' Well, the Latinos are coming, the Latinos are coming! And the Latinos are going to vote. So our voices will be heard. So that's what this agenda is about. It's about insuring that we increase our numbers. That we increase our numbers at every level. We talk about the Congressional, we talk about the Senate, we talk about board of supervisors, board of education, city councils, commissions, we have got to increase out numbers because the Latinos are coming. Because what's going on right now, with 187, the CCRI (CA Civil Rights Initiative against affirmative action), and let me tell you, we can't go back, you know, we're in a civil war. But we need to be solidified, we need to come together, we must be strong, because united we form a strong body. United we become solidified, united we make a difference, united we make the changes, united Latinos will win throughout California, let's stick together, que si se puede, que no? (it can be done, right?)



FROM JUDICIAL WATCH:

“California Democrat Joe Baca actually wants to amend the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act so that underage illegal immigrants can become U.S. citizens.”



*

Bill To Let “Exemplary” Illegal Immigrants Become U.S. Citizens

Last Updated: Mon, 01/10/2011 - 5:22pm



A United States congressman dedicated to fighting harmful anti-immigrant legislation has introduced a bill to change a decades-old federal law so that “exemplary” illegal aliens can obtain American citizenship.

California Democrat Joe Baca actually wants to amend the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act so that underage illegal immigrants can become U.S. citizens. To qualify they must somehow prove that they are “exemplary” by providing academic transcripts, demonstrating an understanding of United States history, government and civics and proving that they are of good moral character.

*

Lou Dobbs Tonight

Monday, February 11, 2008

In California, League of United Latin American Citizens has adopted a resolution to declare "California Del Norte" a sanctuary zone for immigrants. The declaration urges the Mexican government to invoke its rights under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo "to seek third nation neutral arbitration of disputes concerning immigration laws and their enforcement." We’ll have the story.

*

SANCTUARY CITIES OF CALIFORNIA, WHERE THE ILLEGALS HAVE GREATER RIGHTS ABOVE LEGALS, AND ARE ABOVE THE LAW:



California wants you! NO LEGAL NEED APPLY IN THESE SANCTUARY CITIES!

HOW MANY ILLEGALS ARE VOTING IN THESE CITIES? IT’S COMMON KNOWLEDGE THAT REPS. LINDA & LORETTA SANCHEZ (LA RAZA SUPREMACIST) WERE ELECTED WITH THE VOTES OF ILLEGALS!



Bell Gardens, CA * City of Industry, CA * City of Commerce, CA * Cypress, CA * Davis CA

Downey, CA * Fresno, CA * Los Angeles, CA * Long Beach, CA * Lynwood, CA * Maywood, CA

Montebello, CA * National City, CA * Norwalk, CA * Oakland, CA * Paramount, CA * Pico Rivera, CA

Richmond, CA * So. Gate, CA * San Diego, CA * Santa Cruz, CA * San Francisco, CA * San Jose, CA

Sonoma County, CA * Vernon, CA * Watsonville, CA * West Hollywood, CA * Wilmington, CA

*

8 New American Gateways For Immigrants

By Neema P. Roshania, Kiplinger.com

Jun 29th, 2010

The economic recovery may be slow and uncertain. Immigration remains a hot button political issue. But there's one positive trend that will keep benefiting smaller cities in the years ahead: Their growing appeal to immigrant poppulations.



Though New York, Los Angeles, Miami, Chicago and other large U.S. cities remain hubs for immigrants, newcomers from abroad are increasingly settling in smaller communities across the U.S., lured by a lower cost of living, more job opportunities, and a support structure of fellow immigrants. In return, these communities get a rejuvenated work force and a consumer base.

Here are eight rapidly emerging gateway communities for immigrants. All are likely to remain popular with foreign newcomers, despite stepped-up enforcement of federal immigration laws. Some may surprise you.

Benton/Washington Counties, Ark.



Home to large employers such as Wal-Mart in Bentonville and Tyson Foods in nearby Springdale, these northwest Arkansas counties have seen enormous growth in their immigrant populations over the past decade.

Foreign born residents now make up more than 20% of Springdale's population. The area's chicken farms, construction industry, corporate headquarters, and low cost of housing remain a strong magnet.

With Hispanics accounting for most of the increase, the region is seeing more ethnic bakeries, restaurants, media outlets, and other businesses. The once nearly homogeneous local school districts have added English as a second language to their curricula in addition to special programs to help involve parents in their children's education.

Portland and Salem, Ore. (Marion/Multnomah counties)



The growth of the area's technology industry draws highly skilled immigrant workers to northwest Oregon, where they're joining earlier arrivals -- refugees from Southeast Asia, Africa, eastern Europe and Russia.

Fairfax County, Va.

In this large suburban county bordering Washington, D.C., immigrants make up almost 30% of the population. The recession hasn't been felt here as much as it has in other parts of the country and construction, and service jobs are still plentiful. Fairfax County is across the Potomac River from the nation's capital, which, along with other large cities, has long been a draw for immigrants.

There's also a strong immigrant presence among service workers, especially in health care, restaurants, and cleaning services. Nearly 40% of the region's immigrant population arrived within the past decade. Many own their own businesses. And they are encouraging more family members and friends from the old country to join them.

Shelbyville, Tenn. (Bedford County)

Though the foreign born population in Shelbyville hovers around the national average, the small city and its environs have become a mecca for refugees from Egypt, Myanmar (formerly known as Burma), and Somalia. There are jobs in Shelbyville's food processing plants and other factories.

Cape Coral, Fla. (Lee County)

Southwest Florida's Gulf Coast has strong agriculture and service sectors. In 2000, Cape Coral's foreign born population was 8.7%, relatively low compared with national average of 11.1%. In the past decade it has increased by about 250% -- putting it above the national average.

Boise, Id. (Ada County)

Attracted to the area by job opportunities in agriculture and an affordable cost of living, Boise's immigrant population has climbed by more than 50% over the past decade.

Gwinnett County, Ga.

The foreign born population in Gwinnett County has more than doubled since 2000, and now represents about 25% of the county's total population. Drawn to the area by an abundance of jobs in the service sector and the low cost of housing, the immigrants are mostly Hispanic. They are carving out a livelihood in a region where blacks have traditionally been the most visible minority. Gwinnett also has one of the highest rates of illegal immigration in the U.S. -- authorities estimate that half of all foreign born residents of the county are unauthorized.

Raleigh-Durham-Cary, N.C. (Wake/Durham/Chatham Cos.)



North Carolina's 394% immigrant growth rate in the 1990s was the fastest among Southern states, and the trend has continued in the 21st century. The Raleigh-Durham area has been hub to much of this growth.

The draw? Affordable housing and jobs at Research Triangle Park -- one of the country's largest technology development centers -- as well as in the construction and service sectors. The recession and stricter enforcement of immigration laws in the Tar Heel State are slowing immigration growth -- at least for now. But many experts think migration could pick up again as the economy recovers.

Sources: Census Bureau, University of Southern California, Moody's Economy.com

*

The Obama administration will sue Arizona for trying to help Washington enforce federal immigration laws, but flatly rejects the notion of suing sanctuary cities that blatantly defy those same laws.”

No comments: