Friday, May 25, 2012

JOBS? NOT IN MELTDOWN NEVADA OCCUPIED BY LA RAZA




THE REALITY OF HARRY REID AND BARACK OBAMA’S OBAMANOMICS: no legal need apply! WE JUST GET THE TAX BILLS FOR THE LA RAZA MEXICAN WELFARE STATE AND CRIME TIDAL WAVE!



What happens to the economy in Vegas, doesn't stay in Vegas


Published May 25, 2012

FoxNews.com

The Obama apologists and mainstream media (sorry for repeating myself) claim the economy is improving and unemployment declining.

Really?

You mean like in Las Vegas?

April’s numbers show joblessness fell in Nevada below 12% for the first time in 3 years. Hip Hip Hooray! Break out the champagne. Obama has pulled off a miracle.

Right?

Well, not exactly. You see in Obama’s world, down is up, while misleading statistics and outright lies are “facts.” The truth is the shrinking unemployment number proves the job picture is getting worse, not better.

Newsweek just named Obama “The First Gay President.” Based on the numbers above, Newsweek should do a new cover story on “The Food Stamps and Disability President.”

-

Let me explain:

The only reason Obama can claim unemployment is shrinking is because people are leaving the workforce in droves.

Here are the Las Vegas numbers -- read ‘em and weep. The facts are that during the past 12 months 2,000 Las Vegans found jobs, while 20,000 gave up looking for work.

According to Obamanomics and the president's crack statisticians that means the unemployment rate went down. Does that make sense to you?

Under Obama, the worse things get, and the more desperate and discouraged people get, the more the unemployment rate improves…simply because they have given up on the idea of ever working for a living again.

But, of course, that is exactly his goal. In Obama's world, more unemployed people needing government handouts means more Democrat voters.

As the facts in Las Vegas show, there is little or no job growth in America.

Nothing.

This supposed “good news” about unemployment is due to people giving up hope of finding a job. People in Nevada, and the rest of this country, are so discouraged they are dropping out of the workforce and no longer looking for a job.

“How are they surviving?” you might ask.

Many are milking unemployment benefits until the last possible day, then switching to welfare, food stamps, and other government handouts. Some are 62 or older and stayed on unemployment just long enough to retire and seamlessly move on to Social Security after their jobless benefits are done.

(THERE ARE ONLY EIGHT (8) STATES WITH A POPULATION GREATER THAN LOS ANGELS COUNTY WHERE 90% OF ALL SERVICE SECTOR AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS. THIS SAME COUNTY PAYS OUT $600 MILLION IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, PRIMARILY ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS = 18 YEARS OF WELFARE. THIS COUNTY ALSO HAS A TAX-FREE MEX UNDERGROUND ECONOMY CALCULATED TO BE IN EXCESS OF $2 BILLION PER YEAR! VIVA LA RAZA?)

Many are moving to the underground economy. They realize it just doesn’t pay to work a real 40-hour job for low wages and then pay an obscene portion of it in taxes to Uncle Sam. So, they are choosing to enter the cash economy where taxes are zero.

The worst news is that as their unemployment checks run out, many Americans are joining the disability rolls.

Disability payments are at an all-time high, with almost 11 million Americans claiming to be too disabled to work. The shocking part of this is that almost 6 million of them joined the disability rolls in just the 3 short years since Obama became president. Under Obama the disability rolls have increased far faster than the job rolls.

Why haven’t we seen the national media report on that fact?

Newsweek just named Obama “The First Gay President.” Based on the numbers above, Newsweek should do a new cover story on “The Food Stamps and Disability President.”

Or better yet, how about an investigative report on "Gays under Obama: Married But Unemployed."

Nancy Pelosi was right -- under Obama economic growth is measured by unemployment benefits, welfare, disability and food stamps. Liberals count those as "growth," simply because there’s not much other economic activity to count.

But let's get back to Nevada’s statistics because they are eye-opening and show a pattern happening all across America.

The Las Vegas labor force participation rate is down to 64.9%. That means only 64.9% of Adults actually working…35.1% are not working. Nationally it’s even worse -- with only 63.6% of adults working, 36.4% are not. America is fast becoming...Greece.

The mainstream media and other Obama apologists should be ashamed of the fraudulent propaganda they are spreading about a shrinking unemployment rate.

As the facts prove, it is only shrinking because more and more Americans no longer think it’s worth the effort to look for work. Why work when you can collect government benefits for 99 weeks of unemployment then start collecting welfare, food stamps, disability, or Social Security?

The brutal reality is that while he is using sham statistics to support his lies about creating jobs and reducing unemployment, Obama is succeeding beyond his wildest dreams in forcing millions of Americans to seek government support -- thereby creating a dependent population he and his liberal cronies can manipulate.

It’s been said that liberalism is a disease. When it comes to our president and the facts about job creation and unemployment, it is clearly a disease that leaves those afflicted blind, deaf, and dumb.

There is no "recovery." There is only an unemployment, food stamps, and disability economy.

This is the brutal reality of the America we live in today.

Once again, Las Vegas is the trend-setter that shows us the truth about pop culture.

Unfortunately, what happens to the economy in Vegas, doesn’t stay in Vegas. This nightmare is happening all over Obama's America.

Wayne Allyn Root is a Capitalist Evangelist and serial entrepreneur. He is a former Libertarian vice presidential nominee. He now serves as Chairman of the Libertarian National Campaign Committee. He is the best-selling author of "The Conscience of a Libertarian: Empowering the Citizen Revolution with God, Guns, Gold & Tax Cuts." For more, visit his website: www


*

Illegal immigrants drain the tax dollars


Congressional study shows illegal immigrants sap tax dollars

The Business Journal of Phoenix - by Ty Young Phoenix Business Journal



A study by the U.S. Congressional Budget Office released Tuesday backs up the view that undocumented immigrants sap more tax dollars than they provide, especially in education, health care and law enforcement.

The study pulled together reports from the past five years, using data from sources including the Pew Hispanic Center, the Rand Corp., the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and various universities. The Congressional study also incorporated facts from states, including Arizona, but its authors acknowledged there was no aggregate estimate that could be applied to the entire country.

The report says that in 1990, 90 percent of undocumented immigrants primarily were in six states: California, Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, New York and Texas.

By 2004, undocumented immigrants had increased tenfold in other states, most notably Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina and Tennessee, according to statistics from the Pew Hispanic Center.

The report estimates there are 12 million undocumented immigrants nationwide. Of those, 60 percent are uninsured and 50 percent of the children are uninsured. Again using 2004 statistics from the Pew Hispanic Center the average income of undocumented immigrants was $27,400 while Americans earned $47,800. The difference puts undocumented immigrants in a lower tax bracket, thus reducing the amount of federal and state income taxes generated.

The study also showed that while undocumented workers represented just 5 percent of state and federal service costs, their tax revenue did not offset the amount spent by government. The authors of the study stated that, "the general consensus is that unauthorized immigrants impose a net cost on state and local budgets. However, no agreement exists as to the size of, or even the best way of measuring, that cost at a national level."

In education, which the study notes is the largest single expenditure in state and local budgets, multiple states reported 20 to 40 percent higher costs educating non-English speaking students, many of whom come from the homes of undocumented immigrant parents. Using New Mexico statistics from 2004 as a model, education spending on undocumented immigrants comprised $67 million of the state's $3 billion education budget.

The study estimates there are 53.3 million school-age children in the U.S., 2 million of whom are undocumented immigrants and another 3 million who are legal citizens, but whose parents are not.

Undocumented immigrants are more likely to access emergency rooms and urgent care facilities because most do not have health care, the study said. In Arizona and other border areas, states paid nearly $190 million in health care costs for undocumented immigrants in 2000, the study reported. The amount, which the study says likely has risen since then, represented one-quarter of all uncompensated health care costs in those states that year.

While the report found that undocumented immigrants are less likely to be incarcerated than American natives, it said states still bear a large cost for the legal process. Based on a report from the U.S./Mexico Border Counties Coalition from 2001, counties from the four states that border Mexico spent more than $108 million on law enforcement activities involving undocumented immigrants. San Diego County in California spent nearly half of that, with more than $50 million going into law enforcement activities involving undocumented immigrants.


*

THE MEXICAN INVASION AND EVER EXPANDING WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS:


By  Robert Rector   .............Heritage.org | May 16, 2006 (DOUBLE THE FIGURES NOW)

(dated figures THE LA RAZA DEMS HAVE EXPANDED THE MEXICAN OCCUPATION FOR CHEAP LABOR IN CALIFORNIA ENOUGH TO ALONE DOUBLE THESE FIGURES!

VISIT HERITAGE.org for more info on Mexican invasion and occupation

This paper focuses on the net fiscal effects of immigration with particular emphasis on the fiscal effects of low skill immigration. The fiscal effects of immigration are only one aspect of the impact of immigration. Immigration also has social, political, and economic effects. In particular, the economic effects of immigration have been heavily researched with differing results. These economic effects lie beyond the scope of this paper. Overall, immigration is a net fiscal positive to the government’s budget in the long run: the taxes immigrants pay exceed the costs of the services they receive. However, the fiscal impact of immigrants varies strongly according to immigrants’ education level. College-educated immigrants are likely to be strong contributors to the government’s finances, with their taxes exceeding the government’s costs. By contrast, immigrants with low education levels are likely to be a fiscal drain on other taxpayers. This is important because half of all adult illegal immigrants in the U.S. have less than a high school education. In addition, recent immigrants have high levels of out-of-wedlock childbearing, which increases welfare costs and poverty. An immigration plan proposed by Senators Mel Martinez (R-FL) and Chuck Hagel (R-NE) would provide amnesty to 9 to 10 million illegal immigrants and put them on a path to citizenship (THERE ARE PROBABLY NEARLY 40 MILLION ILLEGALS HERE NOW). Once these individuals become citizens, the net additional cost to the federal government of benefits for these individuals will be around $16 billion per year. Further, once an illegal immigrant becomes a citizen, he has the right to bring his parents to live in the U.S. The parents, in turn, may become citizens. The long-term cost of government benefits to the parents of 10 million recipients of amnesty could be $30 billion per year or more (CALIFORNIA PUTS OUT $20 BILLION A YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLEGALS).



In the long run, the Hagel/Martinez bill, if enacted, would be the largest expansion of the welfare state in 35 years.






No comments: