THE LA
RAZA SUPREMACY DEMOCRAT PARTY'S VISION OF AMERICA:
DEATH OF THE GOP
AND 49 MEXIFORNIAS!
California Attorney
General Xavier Becerra and Former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa…..
Members of the racist, violent, fascist M.E.Ch.A. separatist movement.
“Many
wonder why Xavier Becerra was chosen by Brown. But all anyone has to do is
peek into the radical California Legislature, and fanatical Gov.
Jerry Brown, to see the trend of militant Marxist, Socialist, Jesuit,
Liberation Theology, Latino activism on the increase.”
Literally, LA RAZA DEM Gov Jerry Brown headed
down to the open border with NARCOMEX to meet the dictator of Mexico and
proclaimed “California is Mexico’s second home!”
Gov. Faubus Would be Proud of Becerra’s Stand in “Sanctuary” California
https://townhall.com/columnists/jennifervanlaar/2018/01/25/gov-faubus-would-be-proud-of-becerras-sta
|
Posted: Jan 25, 2018 12:01 AM
CALIFORNIA: NOW THE MEXICAN CRIME COLONY
MEXICAN-OCCUPIED CA…. The La Raza Welfare State
Gov. Jerry Brown, on a trip to Mexico, seeks to
position California as a more welcoming place for immigrants... $35 BILLION PER
YEAR IN WELFARE NOT WELCOMING ENOUGH?!?
“This October, Governor
Jerry Brown signed SB 54, the California Values Act, which turns the entire
state into an immigration-enforcement-free haven for all but the most heinous
illegal-alien criminals.” Heather Mac Donald - CITY JOURNAL
We’ve got an even more ominous enemy within our
borders that promotes “Reconquista of Aztlan” or the reconquest of California,
Arizona, New Mexico and Texas into the country of Mexico…. AND IT IS THE
DEMOCRAT PARTY!
Adios, Sanctuary La Raza Welfare State of California
A fifth-generation Californian laments his state’s ongoing economic collapse.
By Steve Baldwin
American Spectator, October 19, 2017
What’s clear is that the producers are leaving the state and the takers are coming in. Many of the takers are illegal aliens, now estimated to number over 2.6 million. The Federation for American Immigration Reform estimates that California spends $22 billion on government services for illegal aliens, including welfare, education, Medicaid, and criminal justice system costs.
A fifth-generation Californian laments his state’s ongoing economic collapse.
By Steve Baldwin
American Spectator, October 19, 2017
What’s clear is that the producers are leaving the state and the takers are coming in. Many of the takers are illegal aliens, now estimated to number over 2.6 million. The Federation for American Immigration Reform estimates that California spends $22 billion on government services for illegal aliens, including welfare, education, Medicaid, and criminal justice system costs.
BLOG:
MANY DISPUTE CALIFORNIA’S EXPENDITURES FOR THE LA RAZA WELFARE STATE IN
MEXIFORNIA JUST AS THEY DISPUTE THE NUMBER OF ILLEGALS. APPROXIMATELY HALF THE
POPULATION OF CA IS NOW MEXICAN AND BREEDING ANCHOR BABIES FOR WELFARE LIKE
BUNNIES. THE $22 BILLION IS STATE EXPENDITURE ONLY. COUNTIES PAY OUT MORE WITH
LOS ANGELES COUNTY LEADING AT OVER A BILLION DOLLARS PAID OUT YEARLY TO MEXICO’S
ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS. NOW MULTIPLY THAT BY THE NUMBER OF COUNTIES IN CA AND YOU
START TO GET AN IDEA OF THE STAGGERING WELFARE STATE MEXICO AND THE DEMOCRAT
PARTY HAVE ERECTED SANS ANY LEGALS VOTES. ADD TO THIS THE FREE ENTERPRISE
HOSPITAL AND CLINIC COST FOR LA RAZA’S “FREE” MEDICAL WHICH IS ESTIMATED TO BE
ABOUT $1.5 BILLION PER YEAR.
Liberals
claim they more than make that up with taxes paid, but that’s simply not true.
It’s not even close. FAIR estimates illegal aliens in California contribute
only $1.21 billion in tax revenue, which means they cost California $20.6
billion, or at least $1,800 per household.
Nonetheless, open border advocates, such as Facebook Chairman Mark Zuckerberg, claim illegal aliens are a net benefit to California with little evidence to support such an assertion. As the Center for Immigration Studies has documented, the vast majority of illegals are poor, uneducated, and with few skills. How does accepting millions of illegal aliens and then granting them access to dozens of welfare programs benefit California’s economy? If illegal aliens were contributing to the economy in any meaningful way, California, with its 2.6 million illegal aliens, would be booming.
Furthermore, the complexion of illegal aliens has changed with far more on welfare and committing crimes than those who entered the country in the 1980s. Heather Mac Donald of the Manhattan Institute has testified before a Congressional committee that in 2004, 95% of all outstanding warrants for murder in Los Angeles were for illegal aliens; in 2000, 23% of all Los Angeles County jail inmates were illegal aliens and that in 1995, 60% of Los Angeles’s largest street gang, the 18th Street gang, were illegal aliens. Granted, those statistics are old, but if you talk to any California law enforcement officer, they will tell you it’s much worse today. The problem is that the Brown administration will not release any statewide data on illegal alien crimes. That would be insensitive. And now that California has declared itself a “sanctuary state,” there is little doubt this sends a message south of the border that will further escalate illegal immigration into the state.
Nonetheless, open border advocates, such as Facebook Chairman Mark Zuckerberg, claim illegal aliens are a net benefit to California with little evidence to support such an assertion. As the Center for Immigration Studies has documented, the vast majority of illegals are poor, uneducated, and with few skills. How does accepting millions of illegal aliens and then granting them access to dozens of welfare programs benefit California’s economy? If illegal aliens were contributing to the economy in any meaningful way, California, with its 2.6 million illegal aliens, would be booming.
Furthermore, the complexion of illegal aliens has changed with far more on welfare and committing crimes than those who entered the country in the 1980s. Heather Mac Donald of the Manhattan Institute has testified before a Congressional committee that in 2004, 95% of all outstanding warrants for murder in Los Angeles were for illegal aliens; in 2000, 23% of all Los Angeles County jail inmates were illegal aliens and that in 1995, 60% of Los Angeles’s largest street gang, the 18th Street gang, were illegal aliens. Granted, those statistics are old, but if you talk to any California law enforcement officer, they will tell you it’s much worse today. The problem is that the Brown administration will not release any statewide data on illegal alien crimes. That would be insensitive. And now that California has declared itself a “sanctuary state,” there is little doubt this sends a message south of the border that will further escalate illegal immigration into the state.
"If the racist "Sensenbrenner
Legislation" passes the US Senate, there is no doubt that a massive civil
disobedience movement will emerge. Eventually labor union power can merge with
the immigrant civil rights and "Immigrant
Sanctuary" movements to enable us to either form a new political
party or to do heavy duty reforming of the existing Democratic Party. The next
and final steps would follow and that is to elect our own governors of all the
states within Aztlan."
Indeed, California goes out of its way to attract illegal aliens. The state has even created government programs that cater exclusively to illegal aliens. For example, the State Department of Motor Vehicles has offices that only process driver licenses for illegal aliens. With over a million illegal aliens now driving in California, the state felt compelled to help them avoid the long lines the rest of us must endure at the DMV. And just recently, the state-funded University of California system announced it will spend $27 million on financial aid for illegal aliens. They’ve even taken out radio spots on stations all along the border, just to make sure other potential illegal border crossers hear about this program. I can’t afford college education for all my four sons, but my taxes will pay for illegals to get a college education.
Indeed, California goes out of its way to attract illegal aliens. The state has even created government programs that cater exclusively to illegal aliens. For example, the State Department of Motor Vehicles has offices that only process driver licenses for illegal aliens. With over a million illegal aliens now driving in California, the state felt compelled to help them avoid the long lines the rest of us must endure at the DMV. And just recently, the state-funded University of California system announced it will spend $27 million on financial aid for illegal aliens. They’ve even taken out radio spots on stations all along the border, just to make sure other potential illegal border crossers hear about this program. I can’t afford college education for all my four sons, but my taxes will pay for illegals to get a college education.
THE ONCE GOLDEN STATE of
CALIFORNA, NOW A LA RAZA MEX
WELFARE STATE, IS No. 48 OF 50
STATES IN LOWER EDUCATION!
MEXICANS LOATHE LITERACY AND
ENGLISH… SUCH APES THE
GRINGO WHOM THEY HATE!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/08/heres-reason-why-ca-schools-are-no.html
“Mexicans abhor
education. In their country, illiteracy dominates. As they arrive in our
country, only 9.6 percent of fourth generation Mexicans earn a high school
diploma. Mexico does not promote
educational values. This makes them the least educated of any Americans or
immigrants. The rate of illiteracy in Mexico stands at 63 percent." FROSTY
WOOLRIDGE
“Third-generation Latinos are more often disconnected — that is, they neither attend school nor find employment.” Kay S. Hymowitz
California—not Mississippi, New Mexico, or West Virginia—has the
highest poverty rate in the United States.
According to the Census Bureau’s Supplemental Poverty
Measure—which accounts for the cost of housing, food, utilities, and clothing,
and which includes non-cash government assistance as a form of
income—nearly one out of four Californians is poor. Given
robust job growth in the state and the prosperity generated by several
industries, especially the supercharged tech sector, the question arises as to
why California has so many poor people, especially when the state’s per-capita
GDP increased roughly twice as much as the U.S. average over the five years
ending in 2016 (12.5 percent, compared with 6.27 percent).
It’s not as if California policymakers have neglected to wage war
on poverty. Sacramento and local governments have spent massive amounts in the
cause, for decades now. Myriad state and municipal benefit programs overlap
with one another; in some cases, individuals with incomes 200 percent above the
poverty line receive benefits, according to the California Policy Center.
California state and local governments spent nearly $958 billion from 1992
through 2015 on public welfare programs, including cash-assistance payments,
vendor payments, and “other public welfare,” according to the U.S. Census
Bureau. Unfortunately, California, with 12 percent of the American population,
is home today to roughly one in three of the nation’s welfare recipients. The
generous spending, then, has not only failed to decrease poverty; it actually
seems to have made it worse.
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, some states—principally
Wisconsin, Michigan, and Virginia—initiated welfare reform, as did the federal
government under President Bill Clinton and the Republican Congress. The common
thread of the reformed welfare programs was strong work requirements placed on
aid recipients. These overhauls were widely recognized as a big success, as
welfare rolls plummeted and millions of former aid recipients entered the
workforce. The state and local bureaucracies that implement California’s
antipoverty programs, however, have resisted pro-work reforms. In fact,
California recipients of state aid receive a disproportionately large share of
it in no-strings-attached cash disbursements. It’s as if welfare reform passed
California by, leaving a dependency trap in place. Immigrants are falling into
it: 55 percent of immigrant families in the state get some kind of means-tested
benefits, compared with just 30 percent of natives, according to City Journal contributing
editor Kay S. Hymowitz.
Self-interest in the social-services community may be at work
here. If California’s poverty rate should ever be substantially reduced by
getting the typical welfare client back into the workforce, many bureaucrats
could lose their jobs. As economist William A. Niskanen explained back in 1971,
public agencies seek to maximize their budgets, through which they acquire
increased power, status, comfort, and job security. In order to keep growing
its budget, and hence its power, a welfare bureaucracy has an incentive to
expand its “customer” base—to ensure that the welfare rolls remain full and,
ideally, growing. With 883,000 full-time-equivalent state and local employees
in 2014, according to Governing, California has an enormous
bureaucracy—a unionized, public-sector workforce that exercises tremendous
power through voting and lobbying. Many work in social services.
Further contributing to the poverty problem is California’s
housing crisis. Californians spent more than one-third of their incomes on
housing in 2014, the third-highest rate in the country. A shortage of housing
has driven prices ever higher, far above income increases. And that shortage is
a direct outgrowth of misguided policies. “Counties and local governments have
imposed restrictive land-use regulations that drove up the price of land and
dwellings,” explains analyst Wendell Cox. “Middle income households have been
forced to accept lower standards of living while the less fortunate have been
driven into poverty by the high cost of housing.” The California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), passed in 1971, is one example; it can add $1 million to
the cost of completing a housing development, says Todd Williams, an Oakland
attorney who chairs the Wendel Rosen Black & Dean land-use group. CEQA
costs have been known to shut down entire home-building projects. CEQA reform
would help increase housing supply, but there’s no real movement to change the
law.
Extensive environmental regulations aimed at reducing
carbon-dioxide emissions make energy more expensive, also hurting the poor. On
some estimates, California energy costs are as much as 50 percent higher than
the national average. Jonathan A. Lesser of Continental Economics, author of a
2015 Manhattan Institute study, “Less Carbon, Higher Prices,” found that “in
2012, nearly 1 million California households faced ‘energy poverty’—defined as
energy expenditures exceeding 10 percent of household income. In certain
California counties, the rate of energy poverty was as high as 15 percent of
all households.” A Pacific Research Institute study by Wayne Winegarden found
that the rate could exceed 17 percent of median income in some areas. “The
impacts on the poorest households are not only the largest,” states Winegarden.
“They are clearly unaffordable.”
Looking to help poor and low-income residents, California
lawmakers recently passed a measure raising the minimum wage from $10 an hour
to $15 an hour by 2022—but a higher minimum wage will do nothing for the 60
percent of Californians who live in poverty and don’t have jobs, and studies
suggest that it will likely cause many who do have jobs to lose them. A Harvard
study found evidence that “higher minimum wages increase overall exit rates for
restaurants” in the Bay Area, where more than a dozen cities and counties,
including San Francisco, have changed their minimum-wage ordinances in the last
five years. “Estimates suggest that a one-dollar increase in the minimum wage
leads to a 14 percent increase in the likelihood of exit for a 3.5-star
restaurant (which is the median rating),” the report says. These restaurants
are a significant source of employment for low-skilled and entry-level workers.
Apparently content with futile poverty policies, Sacramento
lawmakers can turn their attention to what historian Victor Davis Hanson aptly
describes as a fixation on “remaking the world.” The political class wants to
build a costly and needless high-speed rail system; talks of secession from a
United States presided over by Donald Trump; hired former attorney general Eric
Holder to “resist” Trump’s agenda; enacted the first state-level cap-and-trade
regime; established California as a “sanctuary state” for illegal immigrants;
banned plastic bags, threatening the jobs of thousands of workers involved in
their manufacture; and is consumed by its dedication to “California values.”
All this only reinforces the rest of America’s perception of an out-of-touch
Left Coast, to the disservice of millions of Californians whose values are more
traditional, including many of the state’s poor residents.
California’s de facto status as a one-party state lies at the
heart of its poverty problem. With a permanent majority in the state senate and
the assembly, a prolonged dominance in the executive branch, and a weak
opposition, California Democrats have long been free to indulge blue-state
ideology while paying little or no political price. The state’s poverty problem
is unlikely to improve while policymakers remain unwilling to unleash the
engines of economic prosperity that drove California to its golden years.
ILLEGALS
& WELFARE
WE CAN’T
TAKE CARE OF OUR OWN, AND YET WE LET MEXICO BUILD THEIR BILLION DOLLAR WELFARE
STATE ON OUR BACKS!!!
70% OF
ILLEGALS GET WELFARE!
“According
to the Centers for Immigration Studies, April '11, at least 70% of Mexican
illegal alien families receive some type of welfare in the US!!! cis.org”
Violent Crime Up Twice
the National Average in Part of California
The
problem is that the Brown administration will not release any statewide data on
illegal alien crimes. That would be insensitive. And now that California has
declared itself a “sanctuary state,” there is little doubt this sends a message
south of the border that will further escalate illegal immigration into the
state.
http://www.breitbart.com/california/2017/09/27/violent-crime-up-double-the-national-average-in-part-of-california/
Photo: Twitter/@ArlingtonPD
Violent crime is up across the country, but in some pockets of
California, violent offenses — including murder, rape, robbery and assault
— are up twice the national average, according to an FBI report released Monday.
While property crimes were down both nationally and in
California, violent crimes spiked almost 4% in the Golden State, even though
some in academia made a point to downplay the dramatic increase, according to
the San Francisco Chronicle:
In California, 1,930 people were slain last year, an increase of
3.7 percent that came on the heels of a rise of 9.7 percent the previous year.
But the 2016 rate — 4.9 victims for every 100,000 population — is relatively
low compared with the rate 10 years earlier (6.9) and far lower than the rate
in 1980 (14.4).
“The overall picture is that homicide and violent crime rates
went up dramatically in the 1970s and ’80s and ’90s, and then underwent a
dramatic drop in the last 20 years, and leveled off,” said Robert Weisberg, a
Stanford University criminal law professor and co-director of the school’s
Criminal Justice Center.
The FBI’s 2016 numbers, he said, “are not inconsistent with
that.”
Still, Bay Area law enforcement officials have expressed concern
about the recent trend, opening up a debate over whether crime has gone up due
to several factors, including the effort to reduce jail and prison populations
and a struggle in some places to recruit and retain officers.
And Bay Area law enforcement officials are not the only ones
wondering if recent prison and sentencing reforms have led to the dramatic
increase.
[v]iolent crime rate — which includes the number of homicides,
rape, robbery and assault — was 716.3 per 100,000 people in 2016. Nationally,
the violent crime rate was 386.3.
With violent crime in Sacramento rising
at twice the national rate, there are additional questions about the
impact of Gov. Jerry Brown’s signature prison reform, known as “AB109
Realignment.” That measure transferred many dangerous and violent felons from
state to county supervision, and effectively commuted many sentences. It also
put violent felons back on the streets and ended state parole supervision
for those offenders altogether.
In February, California’s law enforcement community was rocked
when a Whittier police officer, Keith Boyer, 53, was murdered
by an unsupervised AB109 offender, who would have been behind bars
had he been subject to state parole supervision.
While Brown has not yet signed the “Sanctuary
State” bill, which would make California
a sanctuary for criminal
illegal aliens, it is unlikely that the latest alarming rise in violent crime
would stop him.
Tim Donnelly is a former California State
Assemblyman and Author, currently on a book tour for his new book: Patriot Not Politician: Win or
Go Homeless. He also ran for governor in 2014.
THE ONCE GOLDEN STATE of
CALIFORNA, NOW A LA RAZA MEX
WELFARE STATE, IS No. 48 OF 50
STATES IN LOWER EDUCATION!
MEXICANS LOATHE LITERACY AND
ENGLISH… SUCH APES THE
GRINGO WHOM THEY HATE!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/08/heres-reason-why-ca-schools-are-no.html
“Mexicans abhor
education. In their country, illiteracy dominates. As they arrive in our
country, only 9.6 percent of fourth generation Mexicans earn a high school
diploma. Mexico does not promote
educational values. This makes them the least educated of any Americans or
immigrants. The rate of illiteracy in Mexico stands at 63 percent." FROSTY
WOOLRIDGE
“Third-generation Latinos are more often
disconnected — that is, they neither attend school nor find employment.” Kay S. Hymowitz
WHAT WOULD HAPPEN TO AMERICA'S HOUSING CRISIS IF 40
MILLION LOOTING MEXICANS WERE SHIPPED BACK OVER THE
BORDER THEY INVADED?
We would also be
ending the TRILLION DOLLAR LA RAZA ANCHOR BABY WELFARE STATE!
No comments:
Post a Comment