The Russian Origins of
Black Neo-Marxism
By Gary Gindler
“White” does not mean white. “White” in radical
parlance means anyone of any race, creed, nationality, color, sex, or sexual
preference who embraces capitalism, free markets, limited government, and
American traditional culture and values.”
This
philosophical concept belongs to Noel Ignatiev,
a white American of Russian origin, who is the ideological founding father of
numerous radical black movements in America. The author of this concept
was even lucky enough to see his best students -- Black Lives Matter (BLM) --
in action.
Research
into the work of this former Harvard professor finally answered the question of
why BLM proponents are so negative about the perfectly rational slogan “All
Lives Matter.” The fact is that the “black” in the interpretation of Ignatiev
is a revolutionary Marxist. All those who do not agree with the Left
ideology should, according to Ignatiev, be eliminated.
The
slogan “All Lives Matter” blurs the concept of the enemy and brings confusion
to the minds of revolutionaries. That is why any mention of “All Lives
Matter” (or its version in support of the police -- “Blue Lives Matter”)
provokes such an acute reaction of the Left.
According
to Ignatiev, “black” is not the level of pigment in the skin, but the level of
adherence to the Marxist doctrine.
According
to this definition, the great American free-market economist Thomas Sowell,
although he has quite enough black pigment, is not “black.” The conservative
justice of the U.S. Supreme Court Clarence Thomas is not “black” either.
According to Ignatiev, many black Americans are not “black” just because they
do not want to follow the Marxist dogma.
Noel
Ignatiev (1940-2019) was born in America in a family of Jewish immigrants from
Russia and was a third-generation communist. Moreover, he was not just a
member of the Communist Party of the USA from the age of 17 but belonged to its
most radical, ultra-left Marxist-Leninist wing. What was his most
outstanding contribution to American philosophy? Here it is:
“Eventually white women can breed out, but my feeling is
that if you are a white male, you should kill yourself now. If you are a
thoughtful person, with a social consciousness who considers himself white, you
will consider suicide.”
It was
he, a convinced, uncompromising, and resolute communist, who in 1967 proposed
the doctrine of “white privilege.” Not
as a racial term, but as a somewhat modified Marxist term of the class
struggle. The notorious “eradication of white privileges” is simply the
standard Marxist wealth redistribution, expressed in newspeak.
Of
course, the primary task for Ignatiev was never the physical extermination of
whites. He was talking about the ideological purification of the “whites”
from the principles of private property, individualism, and freedom -- all
concepts profoundly alien to the Marxists. Supporters of Ignatiev, aiming
for socialism in America, have chosen a very peculiar way -- the mass
transformation of whites and squeezing out of them of all their “whiteness.” He
sees a happy future as an all-American Gulag, where the re-education of
“whites” into “blacks” takes place.
In
this case, Ignatiev has no doubts about
his righteousness:
“The goal of destroying the white race is simply so
desirable, it boggles the mind trying to understand how anyone could possibly
object to it.”
The
showcase kitsch concentration camp CHAZ/Antifastan in Seattle, with its
intolerance of dissent, is the pinnacle of the realization of Ignatieff’s ideas.
The
kneeling of some American police offices, military personnel, and politicians
in front of a crowd of “blacks” (“blacks” from a Marxist point of view, of
course) is an acknowledgment of the supremacy of left-wing ideology over the
law. This is a recognition of the supremacy of the leftist dogma over the
Constitution and the oath.
Kneeling
is a confirmation that America is not suffering from systemic racism but from
systemic neo-Marxism.
Before
citing another statement of Ignatiev, let’s consider its antithesis:
“Make no mistake about it: we intend to keep bashing the
dead black males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social
construct known as ‘the black race’ is destroyed.”
No,
this is not black racism. This is a systematic, canonical, and
“ideologically correct” approach to the class struggle, designed to accomplish
a dogmatic Marxist wealth redistribution. Why? Because since the
60s, all leftists have known the maxim: “The issue is never the issue.
The issue is always the revolution.”
BLOG EDITOR: BARACK OBAMA HAS OPENLY ADMITTED HE WOULD ACCEPT A
THIRD TERM. HIS DIVISIONIST PLATFORM SEEKS TO ACHIEVE THAT.
That
is why the two paramilitary wings of the Democrat party -- the “white” Antifa
and the “black” BLM -- perfectly understand each other. After all, the
race is not a problem. The main goal is the revolution. (By the way, the
“white” wing of the stormtroopers was also created by the communist: Soviet
agent Ernst Thalmann established Antifa in Germany in 1932.)
BLM
stormtroopers are trying to provoke a racial war in America in the hope that it
will develop into a civil war -- simply because it is much easier to make a
revolution during a war. One of the founders of BLM, Patrisse Cullors, does not hide the
fact that BLM members are “trained Marxists” who “read Marx, Lenin, and Mao.”
Of
course, the entire Ignatiev’s clink clank is hardly perceived by an unprepared
audience. Therefore, for brevity, we formulate the quintessence of
Ignatieff’s philosophy in a simplified form: racism
is a form of anti-communism (meaning the “white racism,” of course).
Actually,
many readers are familiar with such definitions. For example, “Zionism is
a form of racism” has been an official UN slogan for many years.
Therefore, the militant anti-Semitism of paleocommunist Ignatiev should not
surprise anyone. Indeed, according to Ignatiev, it follows that “Zionism is a
form of anti-communism.” Moreover, Ignatiev hated Christianity as much as
Judaism (he especially hated Christmas and, oddly enough, Christmas trees).
The Race Traitor magazine
published a policy article by Ignatiev in 1997 entitled “The Point Is Not To
Interpret Whiteness But To Abolish It”:
"When it comes to abolishing the white race, the task
is not to win over more whites to oppose “racism”; there are “anti-racists”
enough already to do the job. The task is to gather together a minority
determined to make it impossible for anyone to be white. It is a strategy
of creative provocation.”
Of course, by
“minority” here Ignatiev means a group of fiery revolutionaries, and “creative
provocation” means riots and vandalism. The analogy with the Russian Bolsheviks
here is direct – the lumpenproletariat was used in the communist coup in
Russia; in America, Ignatiev proposes to use the lumpenblacks as cannon fodder.
No,
not all immigrants from Russia became great Americans, such as Sergei
Rachmaninov, Igor Sikorsky, Vladimir Nabokov, Joseph Brodsky, and Ayn
Rand. Unfortunately, Russia also offered the arch-communist Noel Ignatiev
and the founder of Russian fascism Ivan Ilyin.
That’s
where the Democrats, who are looking everywhere for the Russian fingerprints,
can come unrolled -- after all, if one believes Democrats, even President Trump
is the puppet of the Kremlin. Where is the noble indignation of the
leftist press about the “Russian interference in the United States internal
affairs”? After all, it was Ignatiev who made titanic efforts to turn American
youth into brainless, self-righteous fanatics of a Marxist utopia.
The
question, of course, is rhetorical.
Leftists
in America -- despite intraspecific ideological competition and the amount of
skin pigment -- are not on the American side of the barricades..
Gary Gindler, Ph.D., is a conservative columnist at Gary Gindler Chronicles and the founder of a new science:
Politiphysics. Follow him on Twitter and Quodverum
“Professor Paul Kengor has
extensively researched the Chicago communists whose progeny include David Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett, and Barack Hussein Obama. Add the openly
Marxist, pro-communist Ayers, and you have many of the key players who put Obama into power.”
Black
Lives Matter Founder Mentored by Ex-Domestic Terrorist Who Worked with Bill
Ayers
CNN
The co-founder of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement,
Patrisse Cullors, was the protégé of a communist-supporting domestic terrorist
for over a decade, spending years training in political organizing and
absorbing the radical Marxist-Leninist ideology which shaped her worldview.
Eric Mann, who mentored Cullors for
over a decade in community organizing, was a member of radical-left
militant groups: Students for a Democratic Society and the Weather Underground,
which bombed government
buildings and police stations in the 1960s and 1970s.
In a newly resurfaced video from 2015, Black Lives
Matter co-founder Patrisse Cullors reveals that she and her fellow BLM founders
are “trained Marxists.”
In the video, Cullors is interviewed by Jared Ball of the Real News Network and discusses the
direction of the BLM movement.
“The first thing, I think, is that we actually do have an ideological
frame. Myself and Alicia in particular are trained organizers,” she said. “We
are trained Marxists. We are super-versed on, sort of, ideological theories.
And I think that what we really tried to do is build a movement that could be
utilized by many, many black folk.”
In previous interviews in 2018, while promoting her then-new
book titled, “When They Call You a Terrorist: A Black Lives Matter Memoir,”
Cullors describes her introduction to and affinity for Marxist ideology.
In an interview with Democracy Now!, Cullors describes how she became a
trained organizer with the Labor/Community Strategy Center, calling it her
“first political home” and the center’s director, Eric Mann, her personal
mentor.
The Labor/Community Strategy
Center describes it’s philosophy as “an urban experiment,” utilizing
grassroots organizing to “focus on Black and Latino communities with deep
historical ties to the long history of anti-colonial, anti-imperialist,
pro-communist resistance to the U.S. empire.”
The center teaches and
studies the history of the “Indigenous rebellions against the initial European
genocidal invasions,” the “Great Slave Haitian Revolution of the 1790s,” and
the “Great Slave Rebellions that won the U.S. civil war for the racist north.”
The center also expresses its appreciation for the work of the
U.S. Communist Party, “especially Black communists,” as well as its support for
“the great work of the Black Panther Party, the American Indian Movement, Young
Lords, Brown Berets, and the great revolutionary rainbow experiments of the
1970s,” while flaunting its roots in the new communist movement.
Speaking with ACLU’s At Liberty
weekly podcast, Cullors
described the center as her “foundation,” claiming it was there that she
developed the skills which helped her found the Black Lives Matter movement,
after having been recruited by its director, Eric Mann.
Mann, an avowed communist
revolutionary, was the New England coordinator for Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) in 1968. The
following year, a more radical wing splintered from the SDS, led by Bill Ayers
and Bernadine Dohrn, calling for violent “direct action” over civil
disobedience.
The splintered faction became known
as the Weather Underground, with the stated goal of overthrowing the U.S.
government. As a result, the FBI classified the organization as a domestic terrorist group in 1969.
Mann led a group of fellow Weathermen who launched their own
violent direct action at the Harvard University Center for International
Affairs.
In an article titled: “Band Invades,
Violently Disrupts Center for International Affairs,” the Harvard Crimson reported that a band of 20 to 30 activists invaded the Center for
International Affairs, “roughing up” several staff members and employees before
fleeing.
Several slogans, including “Pig,” “Fuck U.S. Imperialism,” and
“Imperialists Screw All Women,” were sprayed on the building’s walls. Rocks
thrown by the group broke several windows and a telephone was damaged to
prevent police from being notified.
Undergraduates who saw the group leaving the building and
chanting “Ho, Ho, Ho Chi Minh; NLF is going to win,” said they recognized some
of them as members of Weathermen, a militant spin-off of the older New Left
Caucus of SDS.
Mann was later charged with
five counts of assault and battery, disturbing the peace, damaging property,
defacing a building, and disturbing a public assembly, for which he spent 18
months in prison.
At the 2010 United States
Social Forum in
Detroit, under the slogan “Another World Is Possible. Another U.S. Is
Necessary,” the Labor/Community Strategy Center sponsored a session titled:
“Transformative Organizing Theory: Conscious Organizers Seek to Build
Anti-racist, Anti-imperialist Politics Rooted in Working Class Communities of
Color.” In it, Cullors––rising to prominence––was chosen by Mann to be a panelist along with him.
There, Cullors spoke about growing up as a
working class, queer, Black woman, in a single-parent household, with a father
who was in and out of prison.
Cullors stated that “positionality in this country is supposed
to devastate us” and had done so somewhat successfully, while stressing the
need to “fight this thing.”
Both Cullors and Mann strongly
endorsed Bernie Sanders. Cullors was a primary speaker at a Sanders
campaign event the day before Super Tuesday, which Mann attended.
Cullors, viewing Biden as far too
moderate, pushed for the
latter to end his campaign, accusing him of having an “old guard mentality” and
coming from an “old establishment.”
Now with Biden leading as the Democratic presidential nominee,
Cullors and Mann are finding a sympathetic ear for their radical agenda.
As Breitbart news reported, a group of 50
leading national progressive groups representing millions of active members
across the country, are pressuring Biden to adopt the radical platform of the Movement for
Black Lives which was co-written by BLM.
The group is calling for Biden to immediately incorporate their
radical policies, including putting forward a transformative and comprehensive
policing and criminal justice reform laid out by the Movement for Black Lives
(M4BL).
Citing his “moral responsibility in this moment” to make amends
for past harms he had caused, the groups demanded that Biden make commitments
such as advance reparations and defund police, prisons, and weaponry in order
to fully fund healthcare, housing, education, and environmental justice.
“We ask that you revise your
platform to ensure that the federal government permanently ends and ceases any
further appropriation of funding to local law enforcement in any form and
redirect those and additional resources towards much needed community-led and
community-controlled public safety efforts,” the letter reads.
There is Nothing ‘Loony’ About Bill Ayers as Obama’s Muse
This past week several
people called my attention to a post by Scott Johnson on his
influential PowerLine blog that addressed the literary
relationship between Barack Obama and his radical friend, Bill
Ayers.
In the post Johnson spoke
of his high regard for David Garrow’s “staggeringly researched” 2017 Obama
biography, Rising Star. “Without resolving all mysteries,”
Johnson writes, “[Garrow’s] scholarship belies the notion that [Dreams from
My Father] was ghostwritten by Bill Ayers or other such collaborator.”
Johnson emailed Garrow to
follow up on the authorship question, and Garrow responded, “I don’t recall
exactly where the Bill Ayers [stuff] got started, but it, like the
Frank-Davis-as-father notion, is just beyond loony, ’cause Dreams is
already *in galleys* when Barack and Bill first get to know each other.”
I did not advance this
theory casually. I understood then what Obama biographer David Remnick would
later affirm, namely that my theory, “if ever proved true, or believed to be
true among enough voters, could have been the end of [Obama’s]
candidacy.”
My research on this
topic, aided by several helpful literary detectives, culminated in my 2011
book, published by Simon & Schuster, Deconstructing Obama. I
think I can safely assume Garrow has never read it. I would invite those
curious about the evidence to read the book or even to read the preliminary
article cited above.
That Garrow does not know
the source of a theory he dismisses offhand as “beyond loony” is,
unfortunately, altogether typical of establishment political writers. His
airy dismissal, in fact, reinforces the theme of my forthcoming book Unmasking
Obama: The Fight to Tell the True Story of a Failed Presidency.
In the book, I use the
phrase “samizdat” -- Russian for underground press -- to describe the loose
coalition of conservative blogs, online publications, talk radio shows, and
legal monitors such as Judicial Watch that challenged the Left -- and,
occasionally, the “responsible” right -- for control of the Obama narrative.
For eight-plus years, the
samizdat broke virtually every major unflattering story about Obama and his
presidency, some of which the major media grudgingly confirmed, some of which
they continue to suppress. In the book I tell how the individuals in question managed
to break these stories out. In every case, as you might imagine, the samizdat
journalists were met with condescension, if not outright contempt, from the
major media.
Obama’s biographers were
among the more contemptuous. Curiously, the four major biographers are all
named David -- Mendell, Remnick, Maraniss, and Garrow. The last three are
Pulitzer Prize winners. To his credit, Garrow was the only one of the four who
refused to prop up what Remnick called Obama’s “signature appeal: the use of
the details of his own life as a reflection of a kind of multicultural ideal.”
The story Obama told
about his happy multicultural family at the conventions was pure fiction.
According to Garrow, Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, and Barack Obama Sr. “never
chose to live together at any time following the onset of Ann’s
pregnancy.” Garrow quotes approvingly one unnamed scholar to the effect
that Obama Sr. was no more than “a sperm donor in his son’s life.” All
of this was common knowledge in the samizdat as early as 2008, but it came as
news to many of Garrow’s readers in 2017.
Like his fellow Davids,
however, Garrow has no use for information gleaned from the samizdat,
especially information I introduced. On the subject of the Obama poem “Pop,”
for instance, Garrow notes, “Most commentators presumed that Obama had written
about his grandfather, Stan Dunham, not Frank Marshall Davis.”
This much was true, but
“hostile critics,” Garrow continues, insisted the poem was about Obama’s
bi-sexual Communist mentor, Davis. The “hostile critics” Garrow cites in the
footnotes are historian Paul Kengor and me.
Instead of giving me
credit for being the first to decode “Pop,” Garrow describes me in the footnote
as “someone who is cited with the greatest reluctance.” What I did to deserve
this slight is left unsaid, especially since Garrow knows I nailed the identity
of “Pop” two years before anyone in the mainstream media did, including the
other Davids.
As to Bill Ayers’s
involvement in the writing of Dreams, Garrow does not even deign to
dismiss the possibility. He has a discovery of his own, namely that outside literary
help came from a law school buddy of Obama’s named Rob Fisher. This is an
important find if for no other reason than it undercuts Obama’s 2008 boast to a
crowd of schoolteachers, "I've written two books. I actually wrote them
myself."
An established economist
before starting law school, Fisher became good friends with Obama at
Harvard. There, they co-authored a manuscript that perhaps prophetically
was never finished. One completed chapter dealt with the always sexy topic of
plant closings.
“The quest is to develop
guidelines,” they wrote, “on how politically progressive movements can use the
market mechanism to promote social goals.” Garrow quotes the unfinished
manuscript extensively. Its style is wonkish and ungainly throughout.
Sentences like the
following suggest that one author wrote as awkwardly as the other: “While
Yuppies can afford the expensive frivolities provided by The Sharper Image,
others receive insufficient nutrition to allow their minds to develop
properly.”
I do not question Fisher’s
involvement. Obama needed all the help he could get. What I do question is
Fisher’s ability to provide the poetry, the rage, the postmodern rhetoric, and
the Homeric structure that inspired Oona King of the London Times to
overpraise Dreams as “a beautifully written
personal memoir steeped in honesty.”
Garrow seems to dismiss
my thesis for no more substantial reason than his belief that Dreams was
already in galley form when “Barack and Bill first get to know each other.”
Garrow traces the first meeting of these two gentlemen to a breakfast some time
in early 1995. He bases this timing on the suspiciously well-remembered account
of a common friend who claims to have introduced them.
Garrow, however, has a
problem with chronology. He writes that Obama took six weeks off from his law
firm job “in late spring 1994” to finish Dreams. He needed time to
complete the book’s third section, the one on Africa. Garrow claims Obama
worked largely from letters he sent in 1988 while in Kenya and retrieved from
his girlfriend at the time, Sheila Jager.
David Maraniss told a
different story in his 2012 bio. According to Maraniss’s source, Crown editor
Henry Ferris, Obama made an additional trip to Kenya for further research.
Obama confirmed this trip when interviewed by Marannis. Garrow makes no mention
of this mysterious trip, which would have taken place in 1994. No one else does
either. Like much in his life, Obama appears to have made it up.
A more likely possibility
is that Obama lied to Ferris about the trip. Instead of going to Kenya, Obama
may have contented himself with going to the local library and pillaging the
memoirs of longtime Kenya resident Kuki Gallmann.
This is the theory proposed by
tireless researcher Shawn Glasco. He was intrigued by the many words and
phrases in Dreams that also appeared in Gallmann’s book, African
Nights, which was published in 1994. These include Baobab [a tree], bhang
[cannabis], boma [an enclosure], samosa [a fried snack], shamba [a farm field],
liana [a vine], tilapia [a fish], kanga [a sheet of fabric], shuka [decorative
sashes], and many, many more.
Based on Garrow’s
imprecise timeline, Obama flew to New York to hand the completed book off to
Ferris no later than early June 1994. In other words, he spent six weeks to
finish the last third of the 400-page book between “late spring” 1994 and early
June 1994, which is, in fact, late spring.
In his 2009 book, Barack
and Michelle: Portrait of an American Marriage, celebrity biographer
Christopher Andersen offers a much more credible account of how Obama managed
to finish a project that hung over his head ever since he finished law school.
According to Andersen’s
two sources in Chicago’s Hyde Park, Obama found himself deeply in debt and
“hopelessly blocked.” At “Michelle’s urging,” Obama “sought advice from his
friend and Hyde Park neighbor Bill Ayers.” Noting that Obama had already taped
interviews with many of his relatives, both African and American, Andersen
elaborated, “These oral histories, along with his partial manuscript and a
trunkload of notes were given to Ayers.” Andersen’s six-page account makes
sense, logically and chronologically, but Garrow fully ignores it.
Andersen is a
best-selling, mainstream author. He even appeared on MSNBC’s Hardball to
discuss the book. Said Chris Matthews at the end of the interview, “You‘re
amazing, successful guy. You have a winning streak here.” Matthews likely
did not read the book. Garrow did read it and cites the book in the footnotes
but, oddly, not on the subject of authorship.
Garrow nonetheless offers
some valuable insights into the Ayers-Obama relationship, insights that I
believe strengthen my thesis. Once Ayers helped launch Obama’s political career
in 1995, Garrow writes, “Barack and Michelle began to see a great deal more of
not only Bill and Bernardine [Dohrn] but also their three closest friends,
Rashid and Mona Khalidi and Carole Travis."
According to Garrow, the
three couples attended "almost nightly dinners” together up until the time
Obama ran for the U.S. Senate in 2004. This information, of course, makes
complete hash out of Obama’s infamous claim during a 2008 debate that Ayers was
“just a guy who lives in my neighborhood.”
Khalidi, a radical
Palestinian, begins his 2004 book, Resurrecting Empire, with a
tribute to his own literary muse. “First, chronologically and in other ways,”
writes Khalidi, “comes Bill Ayers.” Unlike the calculating Obama, Khalidi had
no reason to be coy about this relationship. He elaborates, “Bill was
particularly generous in letting me use his family’s dining room table to do
some writing for the project.” Khalidi did not need the table. He
had one of his own. He needed help from the skilled neighborhood editor and
writer who obviously could and would provide it.
There is nothing “loony”
about Bill Ayers helping a good friend finish his book. That is what Ayers did.
He was grooming Obama for higher office and was savvy enough to keep his
writing relationship with Obama under wraps. Being a friend of a terrorist,
Ayers knew, would not exactly help Obama’s career.
Jack Cashill’s most
recent book, a political thriller called “The Hunt” co-authored with Mike
McMullen, is available wherever you buy books. For a signed collector’s
edition, see www.TheHuntBook.com.
Democrats Allow Communists to Infiltrate Their
Party Across the Nation
*
“Professor Paul Kengor has
extensively researched the Chicago communists whose progeny include David
Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett, and Barack Hussein Obama. Add the openly Marxist, pro-communist
Ayers, and you have many of the key players who put Obama into power.”
*
We are all victims of the Obama cabal’s collusion with Russia –
President Trump’s voters and all Americans who believe in our free and fair
election process.
BARACK
OBAMA: Was he America’s first closet Communist president?
Obama choose Communists and Marxists
for the highest, most powerful positions in our land, including his closest
political advisors, and his head of the CIA. These facts are not in
dispute. Most are openly admitted by the people in question, as necessary
damage control. Our press chooses not to report them.
Professor
Paul Kengor has extensively researched the Chicago communists whose progeny
include David Axelrod,
Valerie Jarrett,
and Barack Hussein Obama. Add the openly Marxist, pro-communist Ayers,
and you have many of the key players who put Obama into power.
OBAMA’S WAR ON THE JEWS
The Democrats
are now officially the party of Jew-hatred. This is largely due to the
disastrous presidency of Barack Hussein Obama. PAMELA GELLER
*
*
Abunimah’s piece -- and
Obama’s numerous anti-Semitic associations -- got little attention. Throughout
his life Barack Obama has been close friends with numerous virulent
anti-Semites: Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, Khalid al-Mansour, Rashid Khalidi
and others. PAMELA GELLER
THE
OBOMBS AND HARVARD
OBAMA
AND HIS SAUDIS PAYMASTERS… Did he serve them well?
Malia, Michelle, Barack and the College Admissions Scandal https://globalistbarackobama.blogspot.com/2019/03/malia-michelle-barack-and-college.html
Michelle was the next to attend Harvard, in her
case Harvard Law School. “Told by counselors that her SAT scores and her grades
weren’t good enough for an Ivy League school,” writes Christopher Andersen in
Barack and Michelle, “Michelle applied to Princeton and Harvard anyway.”
GOOGLE WHAT THE OBOMB
DID FOR HIS SAUDIS PAYMASTERS
Barack Obama’s back door, however, was unique
to him. Before prosecutors send some of the dimmer Hollywood stars to the
slammer for their dimness, they might want to ask just how much influence a
Saudi billionaire peddled to get Obama into Harvard.
“Of course, one of the main reasons the nation is now
“divided, resentful and angry” is because race-baiting, Islamist,
class warrior Barack Hussein Obama was president for eight
long years." MATTHEW VADUM
THE OBAMA MARXIST-MUSLIM
BANKSTER-FUNDED THIRD TERM for life:
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/03/obamas-marxism-still-hankering-for.html
"Cold War historian Paul Kengor
goes deeply into Obama's communist background in an article in
American Spectator, "Our First Red Diaper Baby President," and in an
excellent Mark Levin interview. Another Kengor article describes the Chicago communists whose
younger generation include David Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett, and
Barack Hussein Obama. Add the openly Marxist, pro-communist Ayers, and you have many of the key players who put Obama into
power." Karin
McQuillan
*
"We
know that Obama and his inner circle have set up a war room in his D.C. home
to plan and execute resistance to the Trump administration and his
legislative agenda. None of these people care about the American people,
or the fact that
WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF THE DEMOCRAT PART’S SURRENDER OF OUR JOBS
AND BORDERS TO MEXICO IMPACT BLACK AMERICA?
CAN’T REMEMBER WHAT BARACK OBAMA DID FOR BLACK AMERICA EVEN AS
HE FUNDED LA RAZA ‘The Race’ AND OPERATED THIS MEX FASCIST PARTY FROM THE WHITE
HOUSE?
Levin: BLM’s
‘Marxist, Anarchist Movement…Is a Piece of the Base of the Democratic Party
Now’
Mark Levin
When politicians support the Black Lives Matter organization,
“They are embracing a Marxist, anarchist organization that is extremely
well-funded, heavily-funded and extremely well-organized all over the country,”
conservative commentator Mark Levin says.
“It’s almost like the Weather Underground except, smartly,
they’re using race as the issue through which to push their Marxism,” because
Marxists advocate using any means necessary to achieve success, Levin said in a
Tuesday interview with BlazeTV.
Levin commented on video of Black Lives Matter Co-founder
Patrisse Cullors saying the organization’s leaders are “trained Marxists” who
want to remove President Donald Trump from office.
“So, it’s a Marxist, anarchist movement that has as its goal to
overthrow the country and to get Trump out. Think about that,” Levin said.
What’s more, liberal politicians aren’t denouncing the anarchist
movement because “This is a piece of the base of the Democratic Party, now,”
Levin said.
Black Lives Matter: Democrats Can’t Live With Them, and Can’t
Live Without Them
The
folks at Black Lives Matter are really worried about black deaths. Not most
black deaths, not even very many black deaths, mind you, but only that tiny
fraction of a percent of blacks who have died at the hands of (presumably)
white cops. Those are the only deaths that boil the blood of the folks at
Black Lives Matter and spark the riotous mobs that loot and burn our
Democrat-run cities.
Why
Democrat cities? Because in 2015, Black Lives Matter activists tested
Democrats’ resolve and found none. At a Netroots Nation Conference in Phoenix
on July 18, presidential candidate Martin O’Malley uttered the unforgiveable words: “Black
lives matter. White lives matter. All lives matter.” Shouted off the stage, he
was heard by a Guardian reporter muttering to himself: “Black lives matter,
black lives matter, black lives matter.” At a Bernie Sanders event in Seattle on August 8, activists
took over the stage. Sanders waved goodbye and rescheduled the event. From that
point forward, the moral authority of Black Lives Matter would remain
unchallenged by any Democrat politician.
“Black
lives matter” sounds good, but it provides cover for a lot of bad behavior.
It’s like the tuxedo that enables a thug to work his way into your party. If
you’re a Democrat mayor and you notice the well-dressed thug robbing your
guests, you might say "Here, take my watch and go away and I won't call
the cops." He’ll happily take your watch, but he'll also grab your rings
and your billfold, and then he’ll demand "Where's the safe?" and
you’ll tell him and give him the combination too, right after he breaks your
Ming Dynasty vase and tears up your Picasso. Finally, he'll set fire to your
house, because he despises you for your presumption in thinking that you could
negotiate how much loot he should take.
There's
nothing you can say or do anymore. You applauded him when he burned Ferguson
and Baltimore, and you made excuses for him when he screamed: "What do we
want? Dead cops. When do we want them? Now!" He owns you and you know it.
You can’t criticize him. Best to take a knee and mutter vague homilies about
racial injustice.
Your
buddies in the newspapers and television can't help you either. They championed
the thugs every step of the way. All they can do now is report that your home
is "mostly standing" and that your thug was “mostly peaceable.”
The
leaders of the Black Lives Matter movement want political power. They’ve
already acquired quite a lot of it thanks to their violent groupies, but power
is addictive and they may want even more. Right now, their knee is on the
Democrat throat. They can do whatever they want.
For
their nominal political pals in the Democrat party, these are the worst of
times. They’ve got a tiger by the tail, and they know it. Their political
survival depends upon getting an overwhelming majority of the black vote, and
if that majority should shrink to 85 percent or so, they’re politically dead.
Black Lives Matter, or revulsion to it, could make that happen.
Black
Lives Matter brings in a lot of money for the Democrats. Corporations are
donating millions of dollars to the cause (just as they paid tribute to Jessie
Jackson’s Rainbow Coalition years ago) and BLM sends much of it to the leftwing
political action committee ActBlue. Democrats love the cash and so are loath to
say a discouraging word about the mayhem.
But
if the riots continue and bleed into November, Democrats will probably lose
anyway. They surely wish that Black Lives Matter would just quiet things
down, but they mustn’t say so. For now, all they can do is wear a happy
face and some Kente cloth and talk about police reforms.
What
Democrats really need is somebody who’s tougher than the rioters and who has
the resolve to stop them. But he's running against them in November
BLM at War with America
Outrageously,
cowardly and traitorous politicians are allowing Black Lives Matter, a racist
hate group to engage in an “Everything Must Go” fire-sale against America. BLM is literally
pulling down monuments and demanding that large portions of our history be
removed from the records. They are burning down homes which dare fly the U.S.
flag. They are taking control of portions of cities, absurdly claiming it as
their new country. Why is BLM behaving like spoiled-brat bullies on America's
playground? The answer: Because they are allowed to do it.
My
stomach turned watching Tucker Carlson on Fox News cite a Rasmussen poll which
says Black Lives Matter has 62% popularity, more than President
Trump. I remembered a bit of wisdom my brother gave me years ago. He
said whenever something shocking happens, before you respond, stabilize your
emotions. Despite the depressing poll, over a million people sought tickets to
attend Trump's rally in Tulsa. Also, a Rasmussen poll says 40%
of likely black voters approve of Trump's job performance.
Fake
news media is so despicable and obviously agenda driven. Here's a NYT headline,
“Trump's Rally in Tulsa Could Spread Virus.” Meanwhile, the NYT and the rest of
fake news media are encouraging anarchists to flood our streets with protesters
with zero concern about spreading the virus.
What
is so frustrating is that BLM is an extreme racist and anti-American hate
group. Years ago, BLM declared war on cops and white people. They marched
down a NY street chanting, “What do we want? Dead
cops! When do we want it? Now!”
Folks,
how can any American in their right mind support these haters, paid to
assassinate cops and whites and destroy our country? Long before the George
Floyd incident, BLM was paid $150 million by George Soros and various
anti-American liberal corporations and foundations.
“Accessory
before the fact” is a legal term referring to a person who incites or assists
someone to commit a crime. BLM is physically destroying businesses, assaulting,
and murdering people. Can victims of BLM file lawsuits against major
corporations who are eagerly donating millions to the domestic terrorist hate
group?
Given
that blacks are only 13% of the population, Christians and decent whites had to
play major roles in ending slavery and empowering blacks. And yet, leftists'
get away with pretending that every achievement made by blacks throughout
American history was made despite white America.
Historian David Barton has done tremendous research exposing how
Christian whites and blacks fought side-by-side to liberate black
Americans.
Leftists
do not give a rat's derriere about black empowerment or black lives. They view
blacks as useful idiots towards transforming America into their
socialist/communist utopia in which anything goes sexually.
A
huge elephant in the room is how long will the white majority tolerate being
repeatedly poked in the eye with a hot poker of racial hate by BLM; demanded to
kneel in worship to blacks? While claiming to be against racial hate, leftists
are intentionally generating such hate. They believe voters will blame Trump
and vote against him in November.
Evidence
that leftists are lying about America being eternally racist is everywhere for
anyone willing to see it. Eager to heal our nation from the wounds of slavery
and racial discrimination, white America excitedly allowed a black man to
bypass the usual vetting process for a presidential candidate. They gifted
Obama two terms in the White House. Naive whites believed electing a black
president would usher in a new era in which they could never be called “racist”
again. Democrats and fake news media used Obama's skin-color as a bludgeon to
beat Republicans into submission, giving Obama free rein to implement their
agenda to transform America into a socialist nation.
Here's
another example of the good-hearted nature and generosity of the American
people. Fake news media and Democrats promoted the lie that Republicans and
white America did not care about the victims of hurricane Katrina because they
were mostly black. The truth is U.S. donors opened their hearts, giving $4.2
billion to victims of Katrina which is believed to be the highest amount ever.
Formerly
of the CIA, Buck Sexton has been ranting in his articles and tweets that we
need to rally around the concept of “wartime conservatism.” Buck says the left
is kicking our butts. He also called out conservative billionaires. Why aren't
they purchasing media platforms and funding our cause?
The GOP is asking people to donate at https://takethehouse.com/, which is a good thing. However, everywhere I turn, I see people afraid, angry and frustrated because they feel like the GOP is doing nothing to push back against ANTIFA and BLM running wild in our streets.
The GOP is asking people to donate at https://takethehouse.com/, which is a good thing. However, everywhere I turn, I see people afraid, angry and frustrated because they feel like the GOP is doing nothing to push back against ANTIFA and BLM running wild in our streets.
I
would love for the Tea Party buses to roll again. Frankly, thus far, the
funding is simply not there. Yes, I have been contacted by concerned Americans
who are eager to donate. However, a tour needs a major donor to get the ball
rounding.
While
we struggle to find funding for a bus tour to inspire and encourage Trump's
base, BLM has a war-chest of mega-millions to destroy America and block Trump's
reelection. There is something terribly wrong with this picture.
Another
thing causing my head to explode is all of the pandering to BLM, an evil and
demonic hate group. In compliance to BLM, pastors are telling their white
congregations to own up to their white privilege. My response is, “Stop it!
Stop falling for leftists' bogus guilt-trip.”
For
crying out loud! America is the greatest land of opportunity on the planet for
all who choose to purse their dreams. Anything else is a lie!
Lloyd Marcus, The Unhyphenated American
No comments:
Post a Comment