FEINSTEIN HAS SPENT HER POLITICAL LIFE STALKING THE HALLS OF
CONGRESS SNIFFING OUT DEALS THAT PUT HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS IN HER POCKETS.
SHE HAS AVOIDED PROSECUTION BY VOTING AGAINST ANY ETHICS BILLS
AND HER HUSBAND, RICHARD BLUM'S HANDING OUT "CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION"
BRIBES TO EVERY DEMOCRAT OUT THERE!
IN THE November 2006 election, the voters demanded congressional
ethics reform. And so, the newly appointed chairman of the Senate Rules
Committee, Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., is now duly in charge of regulating the
ethical behavior of her colleagues. But for many years, Feinstein has been
beset by her own ethical conflict of interest, say congressional ethics
experts.
“All
in all, it was an incredible victory for the Chinese government. Feinstein has
done more for Red China than other any serving U.S. politician. “ Trevor Loudon
“Our entire crony capitalist system, Democrat and
Republican alike, has become a kleptocracy approaching par with
third-world hell-holes. This is the way a great country is raided by
its elite.” ---- Karen McQuillan AMERICAN THINKER.com
Everything we know about Hunter Biden's business connections in
China
·
President Donald Trump this week suggested that Hunter Biden had
used his position as then-Vice President Joe Biden's son to secure a $1.5
billion deal with the Chinese state bank for a Chinese private equity company
where he is a board member.
·
There is no evidence to this claim.
·
But Biden's lawyer said Biden has never profited from his work
at BHR.
·
Here's what we know about Hunter Biden's business dealings in
China.
The global business dealings of Hunter Biden, the son of former
Vice President Joe Biden, have been thrust into the spotlight after President
Donald Trump suggested without evidence that the father and son had engaged in
corruption in Ukraine and China.
Trump on Thursday openly called on
China to
investigate the Bidens, suggesting — without evidence — that
China had given $1.5 billion to a Chinese private equity firm where Hunter
Biden was a board member to secure favorable deals with the US while Joe Biden
was Vice President.
President Trump: "China should start an investigation into
the Bidens because what happened in China is just about as bad as what happened
with Ukraine. So, I would say that President Zelensky, if it were me, I would
recommend that they start an investigation into the Bidens." pic.twitter.com/Xia8vLUVT2
Here's what we know about the background of this allegation.
·
In
2017, Biden bought 10% of the company for about $420,000, The Times reported.
·
The
$1.5 billion Trump cited on Thursday appears to refer to a sum that BHR was
trying to raise in 2014 to invest outside China, as The Wall Street
Journal reported at the
time.
·
That
sum appeared in "Secret Empires," a book published last year that
criticized Biden's business activities, The Journal
reported.
·
Peter
Schweizer, the author, said BHR "would seal a highly unusual $1.5 billion
deal with funding from the Chinese government" after Biden flew to Beijing
aboard Air Force Two at the time.
·
Trump
has praised the book in the past, The Journal reported.
·
Trump
on Thursday suggested that Biden used his position as the vice president's
son to secure the money from China's state-owned bank, and made millions in the
process, the South China
Morning Post reported.
·
But
Biden's lawyer George Mesires said earlier this week that Biden had never been
paid for sitting on BHR's board, and has not received any payouts from his
investment, according to The Times and The Washington
Post.
·
BHR
has removed all photos of Hunter Biden from its website, the South China
Morning Post reported on Saturday. BBHR has not yet responded to Business
Insider's request for confirmation and comment on the date of the photo's
removal.
Mesires has not yet responded to Business Insider's request for
comment on Biden's current role and responsibility at BHR Partners.
BHR has not yet responded to Business Insider's request for comment
on Biden's role and responsibility at the firm.
Is Dianne Feinstein out to kill off Kamala Harris's presidential
bid?
Kamala Harris has always
been known for her lean and hungry, pushy, grabby, ambition, which
includes a willingness to sleep her way to the top to
get what she wants. Her political start began as a social mountaineer
with San Francisco's old-money Pacific Heights set dating from her 20s and then just moved
onward and upward.
That's not sitting well
with California's lizardy old-money senior Senator, Dianne Feinstein, who
knows that establishment well.
And so, she's taking some
action, as Fox News reports:
BLOG:
BIDEN AND FEINSTEIN GO WAY BACK WITH THEIR RED CHINA FOR RAW CASH DEALS
SIPHONED THROUGH HER HUSBAND AND HIS SON.
According to reports,
Feinstein, the senior senator from the Golden State, will throw a
fundraiser next month for Democratic 2020 presidential frontrunner Joe Biden -- and not for
Harris, another White House contender whose poll numbers suggest she could
probably use some high-profile help.
BLOG: WHAT FEINSTEIN MEANS IS THAT OL' BIDEN IS AS CORRUPT AS
SHE IS ANY DAY!
“My candidate would be
Joe Biden,” Feinstein told CNBC back then. “I watched him as vice president.
I’ve seen him operate. I’ve seen him perform and I think he brings a level of
experience and seniority, which I think is really important.”
The early evening
reception will be the first that Feinstein hosts for Biden in the 2020
election, CNBC reported. Her husband has already participated in several
fundraising events for Biden, who campaigned for Feinstein in 2018, when she was
re-elected by a landslide.
Oh, spare us. Feinstein
knows as well as anyone that old Joe is addled and gaffe-tastic. This is more
likely about putting Kamala back in her place.
Fox News speculated that
this fundraiser among the fatcat donors might just have been payback for
Harris's nasty first-debate attack all but accusing Biden of being a Bull
Conner racist. Remember Harris's phony earnestness in: "That little
girl was me"?
Sure, it's possible.
But it's also been known for close to a year that Feinstein considers
Harris a wretched parvenu who hasn't paid her dues.
Remember this?
“I’m a big fan of Sen.
Harris, and I work with her. But she’s brand-new here, so it takes a little bit
of time to get to know somebody,” Feinstein said of the junior senator, according
to the Los Angeles Times.
Her press secretary told
CNN that Feinstein later added that she certainly likes her California
colleague, saying, “Oh, I love Kamala.”
Translation in a plummy
accent: Do we know her?
Hard to get a better
old-money passive-aggressive remark than that one. People are either known or
unknown in Feinstein's rich circles and it's pretty obvious to Feinstein
that Kamala doesn't cut it.
What's more, Feinstein is
a 'get off my lawn, whippersnappers' non-ideological sort of small-c
conservative, or, as Fox News put it, she pulls rank. Remember this?
Democratic Sen. Dianne
Feinstein pulled rank Friday when a group of kids tried to school her on
climate change.
After the group sought
her support for the Green New Deal, the 85-year-old senior
senator from California let them know she wasn't about to be bossed around by a
bunch of youngsters.
BLOG: THE OLD WHORE FEINSTEIN MADE A VAST FORTUNE SERVING
CRIMINAL OPERATIONS LIKE PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC, CRIMINAL BANKSTERS WELLS
FARGO AND BANK OF AMERICA AND THE FREAKING PARASITE TRIAL LAWYERS!
“You come in here, and
you say it has to be my way or the highway. I don’t respond to that,” Feinstein
continued. “I’ve gotten elected, I just ran. I was elected by almost a
million-vote plurality. And I know what I’m doing. So you know, maybe people
should listen a little bit.
So just the fundraiser in
Harris's home state of California was a shiv in the side to Kamala.
Why is that?
Well, for one thing, the
Democratic political set widely believes that to win the presidency, one must
win California. Harris is from California, so that stacks things in her
favor.
Now Feinstein is
marshalling money from California Biden's way? So that they give their money to
him and feel 'donor fatigue' when Kamala comes calling?
The matter is compounded
by the fact that the California Democratic campaign fatcats weren't impressed
with Harris's performance in the third debate, as this CNBC report here indicates. Feinstein
knows those people and may very well be egging them toward Biden, or at least
piling on.
Here's another thing:
Money from fatcats over
little-people donations is Kamala's vulnerable spot. The queen of fake Twitter followers is also
highly reliant on big dollar donors over the little
guys, even as the New York Times tries to claim she's changing
that. Well, maybe she is, but if she is, it would be in the infant stage and in
any case, they're taking her word for it. More likely, she still relies on the
big boys, because that's what she knows.
Which would mean that
Feinstein's bid to separate Harris from that cash lifeline is like that of
General Grant at Vicksburg, targeting Confederate supply lines. The California
dinosaur strategizes.
The Feinstein fundraiser,
which will channel and suction big money toward Biden, can't help but come
at a cost to Harris. And Feinstein, right in the middle of the Pacific Heights
crowd, is lobbing her cannon ball where the funds are richest and Kamala's ties
are tightest.
It almost looks like a
concerted chess move to checkmate the upstart. And given the evidence of
Feinstein's antipathy toward Harris, one can't help but think it's all
intentional.
What
to Do About China
And Its American
Lackeys
|
Posted: Apr 27, 2020 12:01 AM
America’s
China problem is a two-part problem – one part is dealing with those
pangolin-kebabing commie bastards and the other is dealing with their fellow
travelers among our garbage globalist elite here at home. But the Chinese
coronavirus – aptly named the “Chinese coronavirus” because this pandemic is
the result of either Chinese incompetence and/or bizarre bat soup gulping, plus
a lot of standard ChiCom deception – has at least made clear that we better
deal with them before they deal with us. It’s a wake-up call we better heed by
getting woke.
Red China
must be dealt with as what it is – an enemy. If the country’s Maoist mullahs
had decided that they wanted China to spin-up into a first world power and
responsibly assume a place at the world’s head-table by trading fairly,
respecting human rights, not stealing our inventions, and not sending weird
bugs across the globe, cool. But Red China wants to dominate the world.
It can’t
and won’t do it militarily, at least outside its immediate geographic zone of
control. Inside that zone, it wants to be the big bully on the block and it is
only a matter of time before it decides to flex its muscles against Taiwan,
then Vietnam, then Japan, and sometime in the not too distant future, against
us. The fact is that China is building up combat power designed to take on the
U.S., to defeat our strengths (like by building hypersonic missile systems to
take out our carriers), to steal our tech (weird how all their jets look just
like ours), and to dominate in space and cyber. Still, this is a naval conflict
primarily, and we still have some advantages, including good ships (but not
enough) and a longer, stronger naval tradition. You can’t just build massive,
integrated blue water fleets and suddenly be able to employ them effectively.
We have been doing that for a century, but let’s not get cocky. Our naval
traditions today may not be the “rum, sodomy and the lash” that still built a
winning Royal Navy, but they are hardly those of ruthless competence either.
Our ships run into other ships too often, and there’s way too much “social
justice” and not enough “warrior” in the mix. The indiscipline of the captain
of the Roosevelt was appalling and if the bozos with stars
give him back his gig cuz the Twitter blue checks whined, that’s worse. Virtue signaling
one’s feelz isn’t going to win wars.
But even
if our naval traditions were up to snuff, we can’t rely on them to counter the
Chinese quantitative advantage and growing competence and confidence. Remember,
the Japanese Imperial Navy the Westerners pooh-poohed wiped out the Russian
fleet at Tsushima in 1905. Sadly, I would not be
surprised to see an initial battle with Xi the Pooh’s sailors end up in a
“shocking” victory for the ChiComs that should not shock anyone paying
attention.
But the
Chinese main effort is not military. It is economic, supported with information
operations and diplomatic initiatives. The massive, pervasive theft of our
intellectual property has saved China trillions. The unfair trade deals we
still accept have destroyed our manufacturing capability. And the ChiComs are
aided and abetted by the globalist Fifth Columnists here at home who have been
bought off by the opportunity to get rich selling us out to the Reds. Far too
many people at the heights of power in our country, including but not limited
to Grandpa Badfinger’s stoner son Hoover, are getting rich doing China’s
bidding. If you point out that we are educating a generation of Chinese
students and inviting in “scholars” and “workers” who are active agents of
Chinese intelligence and who are stealing us blind, our garbage elite will
provide cover against the necessary steps to stop this looting by labeling it
as “racist.” China is using our idiotic political correctness fixation as a
propaganda weapon, and diplomatically it is going to the rest of the world and
inviting them to sign up with the winning team.
What do
we do?
We need a
massive build-up of conventional military power at sea, in the air, in space, both
outer and cyber. And we need to return to having a serious military that
focuses on killing our enemies and not on pronoun policing and stress card
sissification. Without both, our first day of war with China – which our
fecklessness makes certain to come – will make Pearl Harbor look like a group
hug.
We need
to take this moment to understand that Red China is a hostile power seeking to
defeat us economically. We need to aggressively repatriate critical industries
home from China. We need our own drug industry back, our own rare-earth mining
capacity, our own steel sector. We need to waive the frivolous regulatory
nonsense that made China attractive to businesses in the first place. If the
EPA keeps us from mining rare earth elements, it’s the EPA that needs to go,
not our capacity to obtain these critical resources.
We need
to do what China does without hesitation: bar Chinese companies or
Chinese-controlled companies from participating in critical infrastructure like
5G.
We also
need to stop pretending China is a developing nation and demand it fund all
international organizations at America’s level. That it owns the WHO, yet pays
a fraction of what we do is ridiculous. In too many ways – including in the
idiotic climate hoax arena – China gets an edge by pretending it is not a First
World nation and getting breaks we do not.
We need
to clamp down on espionage, both strategic and economic. We need to openly tell
the truth: China targets the Chinese diaspora to use as spies. That’s not
racist. That’s a fact. But let’s not let the traitors who are not of Chinese
descent off the hook. There are too many people who will sell out their country
for a few renminbi. We need to get the FBI out of domestic politics and
massively focused on uprooting these foreign agents. All spies should be
subject to lengthy prison sentences. This nonsense about just a year or two in
jail needs to end. And we need to clear out academia of Chinese nationals, both
students and faculty. Why are we training our enemy? Plus, we must ruthlessly
expose just who China has bought in our universities, the corporations, and the
media.
China is
largely to blame for the Wuhan Flu pandemic, but the idea of suing it for
compensation is as useless as it is politically attractive. Here’s the way to
kill two bats with one stone: impose a penalty tariff on all Chinese goods to
create a huge pot of money to compensate the victims of ChiCom lies as well as
give our industries a chance to recover.
Most of
all, we need to get serious about this conflict, and it is a conflict. We tend
to see other people from our own perspective. We are reasonable, fair, and
just. But communists are none of those things. These red bastards exploit the
patriotism of the Chinese people – who have every right to seek prosperity and
freedom – to consolidate power and turn the spotlight off their own manifest
failures and tyrannies. We need to get woke, as the hep kids say, woke to the
fact that the Mao pals are bad people and we better understand that before one
morning we wake up with their boot on our neck forever.
Editor's Note: Want to support Townhall so we
can keep telling the truth about China and the virus they unleashed on the
world? Join Townhall VIP and use the promo code WUHAN to get 25% off VIP membership!
You'll get an additional weekly VIP-exclusive Kurt
column
AND his VIP podcast Unredacted.
I am not
saying that I am a visionary, but I am a visionary because my latest
conservative action novel Collapse features ChiComs and their
fellow travelers in a dystopian blue state future. Check out the whole series,
including People's
Republic, Indian
Country, and Wildfire! Also, join up with Townhall VIP for
near-daily chats with your favorite VIP rascals, get my podcast, “Unredacted” every Monday, and also get my free
Hugh Hewitt-affiliated Salem podcast, “Fighting Words” on Wednesdays!
China is an
existential threat to the
United States. Joe Biden and the
Democrat Party
would abet the Chinese
in their quest for global hegemony and
in essence
surrender American
sovereignty.
Silicon Valley, and the Chinese Connection
to Coronavirus Infection
By James Fulford
After Feinstein
was elected to the Senate in 1992, Blum continued profiting off their ties to
China. A the same time, the freshman lawmaker was pitching herself as a “China
hand” to colleagues, even once claiming “that in
my last life maybe I was Chinese.” HARIS ALIC
FEINSTEIN HAS SPENT HER POLITICAL LIFE STALKING THE
HALLS OF CONGRESS SNIFFING OUT DEALS THAT PUT HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS IN HER
POCKETS.
SHE HAS AVOIDED PROSECUTION BY VOTING AGAINST ANY
ETHICS BILLS AND HER HUSBAND, RICHARD BLUM'S HANDING OUT "CAMPAIGN
CONTRIBUTION" BRIBES TO EVERY DEMOCRAT OUT THERE!
IN THE November 2006 election, the voters demanded
congressional ethics reform. And so, the newly appointed chairman of the Senate
Rules Committee, Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., is now duly in charge of
regulating the ethical behavior of her colleagues. But for many years,
Feinstein has been beset by her own ethical conflict of interest, say
congressional ethics experts.
“All
in all, it was an incredible victory for the Chinese government. Feinstein has
done more for Red China than other any serving U.S. politician. “ Trevor
Loudon
“Our entire crony capitalist system, Democrat and Republican alike,
has become a kleptocracy approaching par with third-world hell-holes.
This is the way a great country is raided by its elite.” ---- Karen
McQuillan AMERICAN THINKER.com
Senator Who Employed
Chinese Spy Endorses Joe
Biden for President
HARIS ALIC
A high-profile U.S.
senator with professional and personal ties to China — including once employing
one of its spies — is backing former Vice President Joe Biden amid mounting
questions over his son’s business dealings with the communist regime.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), a former
chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, announced her endorsement of
the former vice president on Tuesday, claiming to have witnessed Biden’s
“fortitude” and leadership during their overlapping tenures in Congress.
Feinstein said in a
statement:
I’ve worked closely with Vice President
Biden and I’ve seen firsthand his legislative ability, his statesmanship, and
most importantly his moral fortitude (NO, IT’S NOT A JOKE, BUT THEN FEINSTEIN
IS THE MOST SELF-SERVING CORRUPT POL IN U.S. HISTORY). During his time in
Congress and in the White House, Joe Biden has been a tireless fighter for hard
working (ILLEGALS) MEXICAN families.
BLOG: FEINSTEIN LOVES BIDEN
BECAUSE SHE WALLOWS IN CORRUPTION. BIDEN HAD SPENT HIS ENTIRE POLITICAL LIFE
SUCKING OFF BRIBES.
“He’s
a totally corrupt swamp thing, and here’s the worst part of his manifest
corruption – he doesn’t seem to realize that he’s corrupt, if not personally
than in terms of allowing his bum kid to leverage his position. He thinks it’s A-OK for his
boy Hoover to cash in all over the globe. After all, that’s what you do, right?
That’s part of the benefits package for being in the liberal elite. And all
these people fussing and fighting about the paternity test-failing dirtbag
getting rich are totally out of line. How dare they? HOW DARE THEY!”
He
wants to raise taxes, open the borders, let you pay for illegal aliens’ sex
changes, and spark a civil war by taking guns from the people who don’t commit
crimes.
The deal would impose no review
of human rights and impose no conditions for democratic reforms, supervised
multi-party elections and such. All that, and more, is already a done deal with
China, like the USSR a one-party Communist dictatorship that never produced a
single product the United States needs. This has come about, in large part, due
to U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein, San Francisco Democrat.
LLOYD BILLINGSLEY
America’s China Dependency
Syndrome
Lessons from the USSR.
April 28, 2020
Lloyd
Billingsley
“Made in China” has been a
familiar label on products for years but it wasn’t until March of 2020 that Americans
learned of the perils that might entail. China threatened to impose export
controls on pharmaceuticals that would plunge America into “the mighty sea of coronavirus.”
Sen. Marco Rubio told reporters
the United States was “dangerously reliant” on China for critical goods,
including parts for technologies needed to fight COVID-19. Since 2004, Chinese
pharmaceutical companies have been supplying 80-90 percent of U.S. antibiotics.
Americans might wonder how they landed in such a dependent position, and that
invites a comparison with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
The world’s first socialist
state, established in the world’s largest nation, never produced a single product
the West wanted or needed. For all its vast natural resources, the USSR was an
economic basket case, and by the mid-1980s in serious trouble.
Suppose that some U.S. senator
had then offered a trade deal that ignored the regime’s human rights violations
and allowed state-owned Soviet companies to manufacture goods for the American
market, all marked “Made In the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.” These
would include vital pharmaceuticals and the deal would allow the use of Soviet
steel, and Soviet labor, in major infrastructure projects in the United States.
The deal would impose no review
of human rights and impose no conditions for democratic reforms, supervised
multi-party elections and such. All that, and more, is already a done deal with
China, like the USSR a one-party Communist dictatorship that never produced a
single product the United States needs. This has come about, in large part, due
to U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein, San Francisco Democrat.
On a visit to Shanghai in 2006
Feinstein told James Areddy of the Wall
Street Journal, “I’ve been coming to
China for 31 years, so I’m not a newcomer.” That would put her first visit in
1975, one year before the death of the Great Helmsman Mao Zedong his own self.
Feinstein was then a San Francisco supervisor, and as mayor struck up a
sister-city relationship with Shanghai. On the 2006 trip Feinstein spent time
with former Shanghai mayor Zhu Rongji, “a good friend.”
Areddy asked about the
Tiananmen Square massacre then turning 21. Feinstein said it was a “a great
setback for China in the view of the world,” a public-relations problem for
China, not a human rights issue. “It was just the PLA (People’s Liberation
Army)” and China “learned lessons from it.” Still, Feinstein admitted, “we did
not discuss it.”
As Ben Weingarten noted in
the Federalist in 2018, Sen.
Feinstein’s ties to China are “way deeper” than any Chinese spy in her office.
Feinstein maintained a “strictly apologist line” on China’s human rights
atrocities, and Feinstein’s husband has “profited handsomely” during her career
in the Senate. Sen. Feinstein “served as a key intermediary between China and
the U.S. government, while serving on committees whose work would be of keen
interest to the PRC.” For two decades and three election cycles, Feinstein
harbored a Chinese spy who fed “political intelligence” to Beijing’s Communist
regime. Since that article, the dossier has grown longer.
Ben Weingarten wondered how a
motivated and empowered prosecutor would operate if tasked to explore “any
links and/or coordination” between the Chinese government, Feinstein and individuals
associated with her office. Such an investigation never took place with Sen.
Dianne Feinstein, the most servile apologist of Communist China since Anna Louise Strong, and
certainly the most influential. On the other hand, Donald Trump was thoroughly
investigated for “collusion” with Russia, which turned out to be a hoax.
It was the president’s tweet
that brought Feinstein’s Chinese spy to public attention. President Trump has
access to all U.S. intelligence, a major reason domestic and foreign foes alike
are desperately trying to remove him from office. In his April 19 press
conference, the president called the upper reaches of the DOJ and FBI “human
scum,” and their inattention to Feinstein, Hillary Clinton and other
high-profile Democrats confirms that the rot continues.
President Trump is now throwing
down with the invisible enemy of coronavirus and making progress despite opposition
from Democrats and their media allies. As they parrot Chinese propaganda, the
president has already started the decoupling process.
“We cannot outsource our
independence,” the president said last Monday. “We
cannot be reliant on foreign nations. I’ve been saying this for a long time. If
we’ve learned one thing it’s let's do it here, let’s build it here, let’s make
it here.”
As with the USSR, we don’t need
China for anything. And as Chuck Berry said, anything you want they got right
here in the USA.
No comments:
Post a Comment