Wednesday, July 15, 2020

TRUMP CONCEDES HIS 'NEW' IMMIGRATION POLICY WAS WRITTEN BY LA RAZA NANCY PELOSI



Donald Trump Promises More ‘Merit’ Immigration and DACA Plan

President Donald Trump talks with reporters as he tours a section of the southern border wall, Wednesday, Sept. 18, 2019, in Otay Mesa, Calif. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci) ORG XMIT: CAEV426 (Photo: Evan Vucci, AP)
AP Photo/Evan Vucci
9:36

President Donald Trump slammed Joe Biden’s promise to flood the blue-collar labor market with new migrants and refugees in a Rose Garden speech on July 14.
But then Trump used his speech to promise he would expand white-collar “merit” migration into the jobs needed by unemployed, swing-voting college graduates.
Joe Biden would “vastly expand low-skilled immigration to the United States,” Trump said, adding:
So they want a lot of people come in with low skills … Think of that: Vastly expand low-skilled immigration to the United States.  These are the things that are in the plan. This is Biden. Biden has gone radical left. Increase refugee admissions by 700 percent. Huh. That’s a lot.
“Every person from South America is going to pour in and every person from other countries, they’re going to be pouring in,” he said.
But Trump then said he would shift immigration rules to favor the inflow of higher-skilled, white-collar migrants, despite the massive unemployment numbers in the American middle-class. He said:
In the not-too-distant future, pretty soon I’m going to be signing a new immigration action — very, very big merit-based immigration action … it’s going to be based on merit. It’s going to be very strong.
As he repeatedly slammed Biden’s endorsement of low-skilled, blue-collar migration, Trump also said he would endorse some form of benefit for the 700,000-plus younger DACA migrants who were brought into the country by their illegal-immigrant parents:
I’m going to take care of DACA much better than the Democrats did. The Democrats had their chance, and they blew it. But we’re going to take care of DACA because I’m going to be doing, in the not-too-distant future, pretty soon, I’m going to be signing a new immigration action — very, very big merit-based immigration action that, based on the DACA decision, I’ll be able to do.
Trump, however, suggested he would demand a swap from Democrats in exchange for any DACA benefits. Democrats “used it as politics.  I’m using it to get something done,” he said, adding:
We’ll be taking care of people from DACA in a very Republican way … I’ve spoken to many Republicans, and some would like to leave it out, but, really, they understand that it’s the right thing to do.
Trump’s 2020 strategy of promising more white-collar migration is puzzling, in part, because Trump has changed public attitudes about migration since he was elected in 2016.
For example, Trump has largely blocked new illegal immigration, chiefly by changing laws and regulations governing the asylum claims by migrants crossing from Mexico. A Pew Research Center survey taken in June shows that only 43 percent of Republicans and Republican leaders now consider illegal immigration to be a “very big problem.”
That 43 percent is a huge drop from the 67 percent level recorded in 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019.
In contrast, his promise of more “merit-based immigration” is a direct shot at a new bloc of swing-voters — the college-educated, suburban professionals who worry they will soon lose their jobs and careers to “merit” immigrants.
Especially since 2016, when Trump promised to end the H-1B program, this bloc has viscerally opposed the “merit-based” immigration that has pushed their husbands, wives, sons, and daughters out of college-grad, white-collar jobs.
For example, a June-July Rasmusen poll showed that 67 percent of all voters said, “no,” to more foreign workers while Americans need jobs. So did 66 percent of people with college degrees, 80 percent of conservative suburban women, 71 percent of moderate suburban women, and 62 percent of liberal suburban women.
Just 12 percent of swing-voting “moderate” suburban women and just 19 percent of all likely voters agreed with business groups and Democrats that the government should “allow employers to import foreign workers to fill job openings instead of recruiting among these unemployed Americans,” said the poll of 1,810 likely voters.
The Rasmussen poll echoed the result of several recent polls, including a survey of 1,008 adults taken from April 21-26 by the Washington Post. The poll was taken just after Trump announced April 22 that he would trim migration to help Americans gain jobs in the coronavirus recovery.
An immigration shutdown is backed by 65 percent of all adults, 67 percent of independents, 83 percent of Republicans, 76 percent of conservatives, 64 percent of moderates, and by 63 percent of younger people aged 18 to 39, said the Washington Post.
A shutdown is also backed by 61 percent of non-whites, 60 percent of people with college degrees, 68 percent of people with income below $50,000, and 62 percent of people with income above $100.000, said the Post.
However, Trump is under pressure from advisers and business groups to expand “merit-based” immigration that allows investors and CEOs to boost their stock prices by cutting white-collar payroll costs. These advisers are betting Trump’s campaign on the hope they can build an alliance of billionaires and blue-collars, leaving white-collars to be targeted by migration programs.
For example, campaign adviser Mercedes Schlapp told Fox News July 12:
 What the President has also been talking about is a merit-based immigration system, meaning that you protect American workers while at the same time bringing in the brightest and the best into our country.
That is a fundamental shift from Trump’s 2016 campaign, when he promised white-collar voters in March 2016: “I will end forever the use of the H-1B as a cheap labor program, and institute an absolute requirement to hire American workers first for every visa and immigration program. No exceptions.”
On June 22, 2020, Trump followed through by announcing a temporary ban on new H-1Bs and a directive to his staff to rewrite the H-1B regulations to favor the hiring of young American graduates.
Trump recognized the importance of jobs and wages in his 2017 inauguration speech when he promised jobs for blue-collar and white-collar Americans, not migrants:
We will get our people off of welfare and back to work, rebuilding our country with American hands and American labor. We will follow two simple rules; buy American and hire American.
The June-July Rasmussen poll also asked voters about the universities’ Optional Practical Training  (OPT) visa worker inflow.
The OPT workers are described by migration advocates as “high-skilled,” but they are a mixed bag of skilled and unskilled white-collar workers who are recruited by the Fortune 500 companies into the white-collar jobs needed by American graduates.
Rasmussen’s poll showed that 52 percent of likely voters who are neither Republicans nor Democrats oppose the skilled program, while just 28 percent endorse the visa worker program.
Sixty-four percent of Republicans oppose the merit-based OPT program and only 25 percent support the giveaway, according to Rasmussen.
The jobs skilled-migration program got its strongest support from pro-migration liberals and Democrats. Liberals split 47 percent for versus 28 percent against, while Democrats split 44 percent for versus 34 percent against. Yet 25 percent of liberals and 21 percent of Democrats dodged the question by saying, “Not sure.”
College voters oppose the program 47 percent to 35 percent, giving Trump an opportunity to improve his lagging support among college graduates. Blacks with college degrees oppose the program 52 percent to 30 percent. Suburban voters oppose the program 61 percent to 33 percent, while urban voters support the program by 42 percent to 40 percent.
The strongest opposition comes from conservative women in suburbia who oppose the program by 75 percent to 18 percent. Self-described “moderate” women in suburbia oppose the program by 48 percent to 29 percent.
These and other polls show that the public strongly objects to companies hiring foreign workers before American employees. For example, an August 2017 poll reported that 68 percent of Americans oppose companies’ use of H-1B visa workers to outsource U.S.-based jobs that could be held by Americans.
The polls predict grassroots opposition to Trump’s draft plans.
“There is a strong sense of betrayal among many Trump voters upon learning of the President’s recent admission … that he is planning a bill or executive order to give a ‘road to citizenship’ Amnesty to Obama’s DACA illegal aliens,” said a July 14 statement from American for Legal Immigration PAC. The statement added:
ALIPAC surveyed the national organization’s social media pages and 50k email subscribers and found more than 90% oppose Trump’s shocking reversal on DACA, and more than 80% say such a move will decrease their support for President Trump.
Follow Neil Munro on Twitter @NeilMunroDC, or email the author at NMunro@Breitbart.com.



TRUMP HAS FINALLY COME CLEAN ON HIS KUSHNER AMNESTY: HE’S ALWAYS BEEN FOR OPEN BORDERS TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED!

EACH ILLEGAL HANDED AMNESTY IS ENTITLED TO BRING UP THE REST OF THEIR FAMILY. THEN WHAT ABOUT THE JOBS, HOUSING AND HOMELESS CRISIS???

Last week, President Trump told Telemundo his administration is working on a plan to give a “road to citizenship” for nearly 800,000 illegal aliens enrolled in former President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

THERE IS A REASON WHY TRUMP HATES SESSIONS! JEFF SESSIONS HAS ALWAYS INTERFERED WITH TRUMP’S SECRET KUSHNER-MEXICO WRITTEN AMNESTY TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED FOR HIS OPEN BORDERS WALL STREET CRONIES!

“Unlike Tuberville, Jeff Sessions has a long record which voters can analyze. As attorney general, Sessions did more than any previous officeholder to enforce our immigration laws. He cracked down on sanctuary cities that protect criminal aliens from deportation by ICE, worked to end asylum fraud, and implemented a zero-tolerance policy on illegal border crossings.” CHRIS CHMIELENSKI


A DACA amnesty would put more citizen children of illegal aliens — known as “anchor babies” — on federal welfare, as Breitbart News reported, while American taxpayers would be left potentially with a $26 billion bill.


Additionally, about one-in-five DACA illegal aliens, after an amnesty, would end up on food stamps, while at least one-in-seven would go on Medicaid. JOHN BINDER



Conservative columnist Ann Coulter, once an immigration-centric supporter of the president and author of the book In Trump We Trust, has called Trump a “blithering idiot,” “complete moron,” “lout,” and the “most disloyal actual retard that has ever set foot in the Oval Office” for attacking Sessions, the “ONE PERSON in Trump administration who did anything about immigration.” 



Alabama Voters Should Consider Immigration in Sessions vs. Tuberville

 By Chris Chmielenski | July 13, 2020 | 4:56pm EDT








U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions adjusts his glasses as he testifies before the Senate Intelligence Committee. (Photo credit: Mark Reinstein/Corbis Via Getty Images)
Republicans in Alabama will vote Tuesday in a primary runoff between former Sen. Jeff Sessions and former football coach Tommy Tuberville, with the winner facing incumbent Sen. Doug Jones in November. But before voting, Alabamans should know how the candidates stand on immigration issues, including ending illegal immigration and giving American workers the first shot at jobs.
President Donald Trump won in 2016 by promising an immigration system that serves the national interest. The White House recently reiterated this commitment: "President Donald J. Trump is continuing to safeguard America's borders from uncontrolled migration, dangerous criminals, and lethal drugs....President Trump wants a merit-based immigration system that protects American workers and serves the national interest."
Examining each candidate’s record on immigration shows a different approach, giving voters valuable information on who is putting the interests of American workers first.
Tuberville supports securing the border, but he’s been quiet on other details that would further discourage future illegal immigration. For example, it is unclear if he supports requiring businesses to use E-Verify to ensure illegal aliens can't get jobs, and Tuberville hasn’t expressed support for a biometric entry/exit system to prevent visa overstays.  He also advocates for additional guest worker visas, which undermine American workers by giving jobs to foreign workers that would otherwise go to American workers and place downward pressure on wages.
It’s not easy to fully analyze Tuberville’s positions because, unlike both Sessions and Jones, he doesn’t have a voting history. He says he promises to support President Trump’s immigration policies, but electing someone with a non-existent record can be risky.
Tuberville raised additional questions about his commitment to an America First policy when he said last August: "There are people coming across the border that need jobs…and we want them to come over here….Let 'em come in and become citizens like we all became citizens."
Tuberville has backed away from those remarks. Still, voters are left wondering how he would vote if elected to the Senate.
Unlike Tuberville, Jeff Sessions has a long record which voters can analyze. As attorney general, Sessions did more than any previous officeholder to enforce our immigration laws. He cracked down on sanctuary cities that protect criminal aliens from deportation by ICE, worked to end asylum fraud, and implemented a zero-tolerance policy on illegal border crossings.
His work as attorney general and in the Senate led the ICE union that represents immigration officers to endorse him.
“As a U.S. Senator, Jeff Sessions was the strongest supporter in the U.S. Congress of ICE, its mission, and its employees," the union's president, Chris Crane, said. "We have no doubt that Senator Sessions will pick up right where he left off – standing up for law enforcement and the enforcement of our laws.”
Throughout his career, Sessions has never wavered in his support of American workers. Without his vocal opposition in 2013, it is likely Congress would have granted amnesty to most illegal aliens and massively increased legal immigration. He has consistently fought for and introduced legislation that would end illegal immigration and put American workers first.
Comparing either Sessions or Tuberville to incumbent Sen. Doug Jones exposes vast differences. Sen. Jones opposes President Trump's America First agenda and believes constructing a border wall is a waste of money. 
Sen. Jones supports granting amnesty to illegal aliens and expanding legal immigration. Instead of boldly fighting for change, Sen. Jones rejects commonsense reforms and has received a failing grade from NumbersUSA.
As voters decide whom to vote for in the upcoming primary and general election, they should evaluate the candidates' records on immigration. Sessions has been a consistent advocate for President Trump's immigration policies, while Tuberville is on the right track but is unproven, and Sen. Jones has steadfastly opposed stopping illegal immigration and protecting American workers.
Chris Chmielenski is the deputy director for immigration nonprofit NumbersUSA.


HAVE YOU EVEN ONCE HEARD 

SOMETHING OUT OF THE MOUTHS OF 

THESE CORRUPT POLITICIANS ON 

AMERICA'S HOMELESS, THE HOUSING 

CRISIS OR THE JOBS CRISIS?

The immigration controls would be a boon for American taxpayers in the form of an annual $57.4 billion tax cut — the amount taxpayers spend every year on paying for the welfare, crime, and schooling costs of the country’s mass importation of 1.5 million new, mostly low-skilled legal immigrants.
As Breitbart News reported, the majority of the more than 1.5 million foreign nationals entering the country every year use about 57 percent more food stamps than the average native-born American household. Overall, immigrant households consume 33 percent more cash welfare than American citizen households and 44 percent more in Medicaid dollars. This straining of public services by a booming 44 million foreign-born population translates to the average immigrant household costing American taxpayers $6,234 in federal welfare.
The immigration controls would be a boon for American taxpayers in the form of an annual $57.4 billion tax cut — the amount taxpayers spend every year on paying for the welfare, crime, and schooling costs of the country’s mass importation of 1.5 million new, mostly low-skilled legal immigrants.
As Breitbart News reported, the majority of the more than 1.5 million foreign nationals entering the country every year use about 57 percent more food stamps than the average native-born American household. Overall, immigrant households consume 33 percent more cash welfare than American citizen households and 44 percent more in Medicaid dollars. This straining of public services by a booming 44 million foreign-born population translates to the average immigrant household costing American taxpayers $6,234 in federal welfare.


Expert: Road to American Citizenship for DACA Illegal Aliens Is Amnesty

(SANDY HUFFAKER/AFP via Getty Images)
13 Jul 2020552
4:04

Any legal pathway allowing illegal aliens to permanently remain in the United States, and eventually obtain American citizenship, is amnesty, Center for Immigration Studies Policy Director Jessica Vaughan says.
Last week, President Trump told Telemundo his administration is working on a plan to give a “road to citizenship” for nearly 800,000 illegal aliens enrolled in former President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.
“I’m going to be doing an immigration bill,” Trump said. “One of the aspects of the bill that you will be very happy with, and that a lot of people will be, including me and a lot of Republicans, by the way, will be DACA. It gives them a road to citizenship.”
White House Deputy Press Secretary Judd Deere told Breitbart News that Trump “is willing” to work with Congress to provide citizenship for DACA illegal aliens but claimed the plan would “not include amnesty.”
Over the weekend, Trump campaign adviser Mercedes Schlapp said the president would “provide support” to DACA illegal aliens. Schlapp confirmed her work on a number of “legalization” plans for DACA illegal aliens while working in the administration.
“When I was at the White House, we worked on several immigration proposals trying to get Democrats to come on board that would have included legalization for DACA recipients,” Schlapp said.
In an exclusive interview with SiriusXM Patriot’s Breitbart News Tonight, Vaughan said any plan providing legal status, including citizenship, to illegal aliens is amnesty.
LISTEN: 
Vaughn said:
I do take issue with the White House spokesperson saying ‘It’s not an amnesty.’ Vaughan said. “Of course it’s an amnesty. Everybody knows it’s an amnesty. That’s the only way out of this for people with DACA. I don’t know why they feel like they have to keep pretending that it is not.”
“Any form of legal status for people who are here illegally, if they get a green card and are on the path to citizenship, that’s an amnesty,” Vaughan said. “Let’s just call it what it is if you’re going to do it.”
As Breitbart News has reported, a DACA amnesty would likely drive a flow of what is known as “chain migration” whereby newly naturalized citizens can bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the U.S.
Newly naturalized citizens from Mexico, according to Princeton University researchers Stacie Carr and Marta Tienda, bring on average about six foreign relatives each to the U.S.
Should all 800,000 DACA illegal aliens sponsor six foreign relatives to come to the country, that would equate to a chain migration flow of nearly five million foreign nationals — a foreign population twice the size of Chicago, Illinois.
“A lot of the DACA family members are already here,” Vaughan said. “I think that with an amnesty, a lot of them will get status through chain migration if our system isn’t changed, specifically the unlimited category of parents.”
A DACA amnesty would put more citizen children of illegal aliens — commonly referred to as “anchor babies” — on federal welfare, as Breitbart News reported, while American taxpayers would be left potentially with a $26 billion bill.
Additionally, about one-in-five DACA illegal aliens, after an amnesty, would end up on food stamps, while at least one-in-seven would go on Medicaid.
At the southern border, a DACA amnesty has the potential to trigger a border surge that could triple the number of illegal aliens pouring through the border. Since DACA’s inception, more than 2,100 recipients of the program have been kicked off because they were found to either be criminals or gang members.
“There are more people with DACA who have criminal records than there are who are doctors,” Vaughan said.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.





Report: Trump’s Former DHS Chief Helped Weaken Rescission of Obama’s DACA that Led to SCOTUS Ruling

13 Jul 2020997
2:47
The former Acting Secretary for President Trump’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) admits that she helped weaken the legal case for the administration’s rescission of former President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.
In September 2017, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions rescinded Obama’s DACA program that has allowed nearly 800,000 illegal aliens to remain in the U.S.
At the time, then-Acting DHS Secretary Elaine Duke — a former DHS official under former President George W. Bush — signed the inter-agency memo to end DACA but now admits she purposefully helped weaken its legal standing by not putting any policy reasons for the program’s rescission.
Duke said she wanted Congress to pass a DACA amnesty to make sure the hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens enrolled in the program could permanently remain in the U.S.
The New York Times reported in Duke’s first interview since leaving DHS:
Ms. Duke said she did not include policy reasons in the memo because she did not agree with the ideas being pushed by Mr. Miller and Mr. Sessions: that DACA amounted to an undeserved amnesty and that it would encourage new waves of illegal immigration. [Emphasis added]
She said she still agreed that DACA “isn’t a legal program,” but hoped that Republicans and Democrats in Congress would eventually find a way to allow the undocumented immigrants covered by the program to live and work permanently in the United States. [Emphasis added]
Duke’s refusal to include specific policy reasons for ending DACA was vital to the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision that demanded the Trump administration refile paperwork to end the program, as Breitbart News’s Joel Pollack reported at the time:
In a complex, 5-4 opinion, in which Chief Justice John Roberts joined the Court’s four liberal justices, the majority held that the administration had failed to offer sufficient reasons for rescinding the policy, and had failed to provide enough consideration about what would happen to the 700,000 people who had registered for the DACA program. [Emphasis added]
Likewise, Duke revealed in the Times interview that she will not yet commit to voting for Trump for a second term against Democrat Joe Biden.
“That’s a really hard question,” Duke told the Times when asked if she would vote for Trump in November. “But given the choices, I don’t know yet.”
Duke became Acting DHS Secretary after General John Kelly left the agency as chief to join Trump in the White House as the president’s chief of staff.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.


Trump's Illegal Caravans and Catch and Release Directives

More and 
larger illegal alien caravans are forming because President Donald J. Trump is letting them into America while attempting to mislead his followers on the issues.

Trump falsely told America he was ordering DHS to repel the caravans.. He later claimed they had stopped the caravans, and while this is true, the caravans were only stopped at the Mexican border so they could take them into America in groups of 60-100 at a time.

I believe this was done because cameras catching a large group of illegals proudly breaking through the gates into America, as they did on Mexico's southern border, could be enough to finally ignite a political revolt against Trump and the globalist agenda he serves.

These illegal caravans are Trump Caravans coming to America for Trump's Catch and Release Amnesty policies.

If you listen to Trump carefully or read his numerous Tweets, you will see Trump blaming Mexico, Democrats, judges, anyone and everyone but himself for these outrages at our border. Trump wants us to believe it is everyone else's fault and responsibility but his own, when in truth the illegal immigration buck stops with Trump!

The President of the United States is commanded by Article IV of the US Constitution to protect all states from invasion, and President Donald J. Trump is obviously not doing that!


Top 10 List of Trump's Broken Campaign Promises

1. Trump reversed his campaign position of reducing legal immigration levels and now supports raising legal immigration levels according to his State of the Union Speech of Feb 5, 2019. Trump also signed a legal immigration increase of unskilled H2B visas in the Amnesty containing secret budget billH.J.Res. 31. New reports indicate his son-in-law Jared Kushner's new immigration legislation will contain more legal immigration increases that will harm American workers.

2. Trump promised caravan illegals could not come into the USA. (
Caravan illegals allowed to enter the US under Trump's Catch and Release directives.)

3. Trump promised to end Obama's unconstitutional DACA Amnesty on his first day in office. (Trump continues DACA Amnesty giving deportation protection and jobs to more than 700,000 illegal aliens in violation of existing federal laws!)

4. Amnesty Don: Trump promised to oppose Amnesty. (Trump endorsed Amnesty legislation HR 4760, signed Amnesty for illegal immigrant minors in the secret budget bill 
H.J.Res. 31Tweeted he is open to larger Amnesty on Jan 20, 2019, and has deployed his son-in-law Jared Kushner to cut a deal with Democrats to give Amnesty to millions of illegals.)

5. Trump promised an Executive Order to end birthright citizenship for illegals to rally his base just before the 2018 elections. (No Order Issued.)

6. Trump promised all illegals, including DACA recipients, would go home. (Trump now supports Amnesty via HR 4760 and HJ Res 31 which allows most illegals to stay.)

7. Trump promised DHS would clean up elections fraud when he canceled the Kris Kobach led Commission On Elections Integrity. (No DHS Action.)

8. Trump promised to end Sanctuary Cities. (No Action on that and now Trump delivers more illegal aliens to Democrat strongholds where they receive maximum taxpayer benefits and protection from deportation.)

9. Trump promised to end catch and release of illegals. (Catch and release continues.)

10.
 (UPDATE FEB 18, 2019 TRUMP SIGNED EMERGENCY ORDER)-- Trump said he would declare an emergency and have the military build the wall. (No action till Feb 18, 2019) Trump's border wall promise remains 90% broken because a wall will not work as long as Border Patrol catches and releases illegals and escorts them into the USA.


As you can see from these ten painful facts above, President Donald J. Trump is conducting the largest fraud ever committed upon the American public.

We thought we were electing another President Dwight D. Eisenhower, but we got another GW Bush because Trump's immigration policies and legislative agenda are very similar to the Bush administration.

We need all Americans to come to terms with these betrayals and begin to organize rapidly to defend against these policies and the new legislative Amnesty push coming from the White House.

We are going to need Laura Ingraham, Tucker Carlson, Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, Kris Kobach, Rush Limbaugh, and Michael Savage to fight harder than ever before.

We need NumbersUSA, Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), and the Federation of Americans for Immigration Reform (FAIR) and their surrogates Roy Beck, Dan Stein, Rosemary Jenks, Mark Krikorian, and Stephen Camarota to stop conducting "listening sessions" with Jared Kushner in the White House to aid his efforts to cut a deal on Amnesty for millions of illegals.

We all need to fight illegal immigration, Amnesty, and the 
North American Union, harder than ever before and inform as many remaining Trump supporters as possible about how they have been used and lied to by a Republican once again.

With lifelong Democrats like Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump running the show in the White House and espousing plans to run for President as Democrats one day it makes many of us wonder... Was Trump ever really a Republican at all or merely an actor playing the role of a Judas Goat leading conservatives to our doom?

No comments: