The critical element required
is a pattern of criminal or racketeering activity . This pattern
is proved by showing two predicate crimes were committed within ten
years. The list of predicate
crimes is extensive and includes bribery, embezzlement,
fraud, theft, money laundering, and obstruction of justice.
The list of predicate crimes is extensive and includes bribery, embezzlement,
fraud, theft, money laundering, and obstruction of justice.
Secretary
Hillary Clinton and the Deep State: A RICO Criminal Conspiracy
By Ron
Wright
We who elected President Trump understood our
elected officials and the Deep State were sandbagging Trump and self-dealing
public funds. It was no secret that President Trump is no angel,
unpresidential, blunt, and crude, and a disruptor. Trump was hired to drain the
swamp.
I watched this kabuki theater unfold over the
last several years. Through my eyes as a shopworn gumshoe, I will explain what
is happening. My investigative curiosity was first piqued by the ATF Fast and
Furious scandal and continues through the recent House impeachment show trial.
There is a common element running through all of these cons —
the actions of an organized crime conspiracy. A group of people
either acting alone or in concert with others committed crimes with a common
purpose - a criminal enterprise as described in
" CRIMINAL RICO: 18 USC. §§1961-1968 A
Manual For Federal Prosecutors ."
The players acted together – in the usurpation of
power, the abuse of power by public officials, bribery, thefts by fraud
including federal funds, money laundering, perjury and the obstruction of
justice, the violations of fundamental of civil rights, aided and abetted in
the commission of these crimes and or to conceal these crimes. Criminals will
lie and can't keep their lies straight. Their methods and behaviors are the
same, whether engaging in street crimes or elaborate white-collar financial
schemes. The only difference is when more money is involved, the perps are more
adept in concealing, covering up their sins, and hiding where the money went.
Many of these scandals are well known to the American Thinker readers.
I will focus my comments on Hillary's home brew sever and the Clinton
Foundation as an example of how RICO can be used to prosecute the players.
FBI Director James Comey indicted Hillary Clinton
for her home brew server at his press conference. Comey then egregiously
concluded that there was no evidence of criminal intent purportedly “required”
to prosecute. Comey bastardized the Federal Espionage Act in absolving
Hillary Clinton. FBI's investigation of Clinton's emails was low-balled. There
was never a real search for the truth. The outcome was preordained. My jaw
dropped wide open. I knew the fix was in. FBI Director Comey lied to the people
with a straight face. Why?
The chance meeting of Bill Clinton and AG Loretta
Lynch on the airport tarmac was no mere coincidence. This chat was not about
the grandkids. Bill Clinton was there to convey a specific message to Lynch
that there would be no indictment of Hillary. Hillary Clinton's email case must
tank. This
would have constituted bribery, if AG Lynch was assured she would continue as
AG in Clinton Administration. This meeting took place only weeks before
Comey's press conference dumping Hillary Clinton's email case.
The Deep State needed Hillary Clinton to win the
2016 presidential election, or the dike holding back the truth would burst.
Trump, the disruptor, was an immediate threat to both the Republicans,
Democrats, and the Deep State. If the truth were laid bare, it would expose
the Obama Administration, Hillary Clinton, the Senate and House, and many
executive departments for these abuses of power, corruption, bribery, frauds,
and thefts of public funds.
High-level government officials and the Deep
State committed many serious felonies either in furtherance of or to conceal
the crimes committed in the pay to play scam. In exchange
for favorable consideration by Secretary Clinton, those who benefited
would donate to the Clinton Foundation. The FBI started and
stopped investigations into the Clinton Foundation at least twice as reported
by the Washington Post . Peter Schweizer's book, Clinton Cash , is the most damning. Dinesh D'Souza slammed the
Foundation in the National Review , as did The Federalist.
The status of the investigation of the Foundation
by US Attorney John Huber's is unknown. Rudy Giuliani said there was enough to
pursue "Clinton Inc" as
racketeering under RICO . The Foundation and its affiliated nonprofits require a real
investigation with an in-depth forensic audit to determine where the money
went. In financial crimes investigation, the prime rule is "follow the
money, honey." Illicit nonprofits have many ways to divert funds by
inflating salaries, expenses, and money laundering.
Illegal nonprofit schemes are difficult to
prosecute without hard evidence and the testimony of insiders. The motive of
Hillary Clinton's use of the home brew server was to conceal emails from FOIA
requests that would provide the hard evidence. Hillary Clinton destroyed the
data on her server and cell phones with the knowledge of the FBI. It took years
for Judicial Watch and others to pry
and recover some of these damning emails from the foot-dragging executive
departments that were complicit and knew what was going on.
RICO initially was used to target mob families.
RICO is also a useful tool to fight white collar conspiracies. They both have
the same hierarchy of low-level crooks led by the top players, linked together
with a common purpose. RICO has tools to squeeze the low-level operatives to
gather evidence to prosecute, jail, and seize assets of the conspirators. The
critical element required is a pattern of criminal or racketeering
activity . This pattern is proved by showing two predicate crimes were
committed within ten years. The list of predicate crimes is extensive and
includes bribery, embezzlement, fraud, theft, money laundering, and obstruction
of justice. The typical five-year statute of limitations for most federal
felonies is extended to ten years from the last criminal act or acts committed
to conceal the conspiracy, i.e., lying under oath and similar actions to
obstruct justice. The prison sentences are steep. The effect is to cut off the
head of the organization and not just the low-level players.
The criminal activity extends back to the ATF's
Fast and Furious program through the House impeachment show trial to cover up
the illegal acts of the Obama Administration, Hillary Clinton, the Department
of State, the DOJ, the FBI, and the CIA. A telltale sign that the DOJ
under US Attorney General Barr is willing to play hardball and may use RICO,
came when he spoke to the Federalist Society: " Barr accuses liberal 'resistance' of
trying to 'sabotage' Trump ." AG Barr said this, " shows FBI launched Trump campaign
investigation on the 'thinnest of suspicions. " AG Barr is the new sheriff in town,
he wears a badge, has guns and will travel, can impanel grand juries, indict
and arrest people, and is not limited in his jurisdiction, like DOJ IG
Horowitz.
The collective actions of the Deep State are and
were a silent coup to delegitimize a Presidential candidate. Once elected to
impede and resist the duly elected President. The President's law enforcement
and intel agencies were corrupted at the highest level and went rogue.
Organized crime can't exist without corrupt law
enforcement. As I wrote in a letter to President Trump earlier this year:
. . . I believe you
understand the gravity of the situation and of its importance to the very
survival of our Country as we know it. If the people involved are not held
accountable for their actions, we will be no different than some Third World
Banana Republic.
Failure to act will
destroy our founding principle of the Rule of Law as stated by President John
Adams, "We Are a Nation of Laws, Not of Men" and we cannot allow a
two-tiered justice system to prevail.
Ron
Wright is a retired detective from Riverside PD, CA. BA in political science
CSUF, M. Adm. University of Cal, Riverside. Facebook at Ron T. Cop.
“Our entire crony capitalist system, Democrat
and Republican alike, has become a kleptocracy approaching par with
third-world hell-holes. This is the way a great country is raided by
its elite.” ---- Karen McQuillan AMERICAN THINKER.com
Peter Schweizer, author of
“ Secret Empires: How the
American Political Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends American
presidents have their famous speeches, remembered long after they leave office.
JFK said: “Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do
for your country.” Ronald Reagan stood at the Brandenburg Gate and told Mikhail
Gorbachev to: “Tear down this wall.”
Some
speeches are memorable in other ways. George W. Bush, days after 9/11, ironically
announced that: “Islam is peace.” Barack Obama proclaimed himself the
messiah: “This was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow,
and our planet began to heal.”
President
Trump has certainly given strong speeches, such as at the recent March for
Life. But he may be remembered more for his raucous rallies and hilarious
tweets. Yet one speech has flown under the radar.
On
Oct. 13, 2016, just weeks before the election, Trump spoke at a campaign rally in Florida. Leading up to the
election, he was holding several rallies each day, giving numerous speeches,
but this seemingly random speech stands out.
The
enigmatic Q group refers to it as the speech that got Donald Trump elected. As
it was one of many pre-election speeches he gave and at a Florida rally, it may
have only been heard by a fraction of Trump voters before the election, but it
certainly encapsulates his philosophy, both before and after the election,
toward government corruption.
The
speech explains the resistance by the Washington, D.C. ruling class to Trump’s
candidacy, election, and presidency. Trump attacked the foundation of deep
state power, wealth, and corruption. Trump was indeed an “existential threat”
to the cabal.
Before
even being elected, and years before Joe Biden decided to run for president,
Donald Trump was focused on corruption. Not to influence his reelection, as
House Democrats accuse, since he wasn’t even president yet. But because rooting
out corruption was part of his plan to make America great again.
Everything
that followed his election, from the Russian collusion accusations, White House
leaks, special counsel investigation, and now impeachment, is a reaction to the
ideas Trump explains in this 6-minute speech. Watch it here or read the transcript .
The
opening lines are prescient, becoming painfully obvious now almost four years
after he laid out the scale of corruption.
Our movement is about replacing a failed
and corrupt political establishment with a new government controlled by you,
the American People. There is nothing the political
establishment will not do, and no lie they will
not tell, to hold on to their prestige and power at your expense.
The Washington establishment, and the financial
and media corporations that fund it, exists for only one reason: to protect and
enrich itself.
The establishment has trillions of dollars at
stake in this election. As an example, just one single trade deal they’d like
to pass, involves trillions of dollars controlled by many countries,
corporations and lobbyists.
For those who control the levers of power in
Washington, and for the global special interests they partner with, our
campaign represents an existential threat.
“Protect
and enrich.” This is a perfect encapsulation of the Clinton Foundation and
the Obama book and television deals. Then there is the Biden family corruption,
followed closely behind by similar abuses of power and office by the Warren and
Sanders families, as Peter Schweizer described in his recent book “Profiles in
Corruption.” These names just scratch the surface of government
corruption.
Candidate
Trump then went on to say:
It’s a global power structure that is responsible
for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our
country of its wealth, and put that money into the pockets of a handful of
large corporations and political entities.
This
is money given to corrupt foreign countries, disguised as aid, only to be
returned to the political elite by hiring their unqualified family members for
do-nothing jobs, as in Hunter Biden, or funneling these U.S. taxpayer dollars
back into political foundations, consultancies, or campaign contributions.
Once
upon a time, journalists investigated such corruption. Now they ignore it,
aiding and abetting the deception. As Trump said in his speech:
The corporate media in our country is no longer
involved in journalism. They are a political special interest, no different
than any lobbyist or other financial entity with an agenda.
Speak
up against the cabal and you will be destroyed, or even commit suicide. Trump
went on:
The establishment and their media enablers wield
control over this nation through means that are well known. Anyone who challenges
their control is deemed a sexist, a racist, a xenophobe and morally deformed.
They will attack you, they will slander you, they will seek to destroy your
career and reputation. And they will lie, lie and lie even more.
It’s
amazing that Trump predicted exactly what happened a few days ago when
“Republican political strategist” Rick Wilson called the group of “you” mentioned above, “credulous boomer
rubes” with CNN hack Don Lemon laughing so hard he almost fell off his chair.
President
Trump has been impeached for drawing back the curtain on deep state
malfeasance. Before handing over millions of hard earned U.S. taxpayer dollars
to Ukraine, the most
corrupt country in Europe, he wanted to know
the money was necessary and going where promised, rather than into the pockets
of oligarchs and U.S. politician grifters.
He
acted as he was required to under
the “Treaty with Ukraine on mutual legal
assistance in criminal matters,” ratified in 2000, 15 years before Trump
announced his run for president. He was doing his job, fulfilling his
Constitutional oath of office. His reward for pouring roach killer in the nest of
Democrat crooks and knaves was impeachment and a concerted effort by Democrats,
the media, and nasty NeverTrump Republicans, all heads on the same toxic hydra,
to overturn the last election and rig the next one.
It’s
not about Trump enriching himself, despite what Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler
say, it’s for the country. Again, from the famous speech:
I didn’t need to do this. I built a great
company, and I had wonderful life. I could have enjoyed the benefits of years
of successful business for myself and my family, instead of going through this
absolute horror show of lies, deceptions and malicious attacks. I’m doing it
because this country has given me so much, and I feel strongly it was my turn
to give back.
It’s
all about corruption, exposing it, rooting it out, and destroying it. Those who
are the most threatened are those who scream the loudest. Given the Democrat
and media apoplexy, Trump must be getting closer to the truth.
He
ended his speech by throwing down the gauntlet:
We will vote to put this corrupt government
cartel out of business. We will remove from our politics the special interests
who have betrayed our workers, our borders, our freedoms, and our sovereign
rights as a nation. We will end the politics of profit, we will end the rule of
special interests, we will put a stop to the raiding of our country – and the
disenfranchisement of our people.
It’s
not about abuse of power or obstruction of Congress. It’s not about quid
pro quo or bribery. It’s simply a new sheriff in town, bringing law
and order to drain a swamp of greed and corruption. It’s President Trump doing
exactly what he said he would do if elected, making America great again.
He
is doing what past presidents have talked about and promised, but then either
looked the other way or became active participants in the graft. And those
milking the system are petrified over exposure and their long overdue
reckoning.
Brian C. Joondeph, M.D., is
a Denver-based physician and freelance writer whose pieces have appeared in
American Thinker, Daily Caller, and other publications. Follow him on Facebook , LinkedIn , Twitter , and QuodVerum .
Clinton Foundation Put On Watch List Of Suspicious ‘Charities’
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/04/charity-navigator-clinton-foundation.htm l
"But what the Clintons do is criminal
because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel
thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their
friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs
beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by
now." ---- Patricia McCarthy
HILLARY &
BILLARY: The Evita and Juan Peron of Wall Street
The Clinton Looting of the Poor of Haiti
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/10/the-clinton-mafia-loots-poor-of-haiti.html
“The couple parlayed lives
supposedly spent in “public service”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in
the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes. The basic
components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall Street and
Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and donations to the
ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”
IT WAS BILL
CLINTON WHO UNLEASHED WALL STREET’S BIGGEST CRIMINAL BANKSTERS…. And haven’t
they sucked up the banksters’ gratuities since?
Only Barack
Obama has serviced banksters more than Hillary and Billary!
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2016/07/the-bankster-funded-democrat-party-for.html
“Clinton also failed to mention how he and Hillary
cashed in after his presidential tenure to
make themselves multimillionaires, in part by taking tens of
millions in speaking fees from Wall Street bankers.”
FROM DAY ONE THE CLINTONS HAVE BEEN A CRIME TIDAL WAVE!
Anatomy of a Clinton Scam
By Charles Ortel
“The
bigger the lie, the more likely the buy-in” -- that must be the theory
underlying a plan relentlessly executed by Bill and Hillary Clinton to suck
money from the public in support of a supposed “charity” currently known as
“Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation.”
Unlike
the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation that was originally funded primarily by
the Gates family, the Clinton Foundation was meant to take money from the
general public, and from governments.
So,
affairs of the Clinton Foundation were never supposed to be directed by the
Clinton family. But public records apparently prove that strict rules governing
the conduct of public charities are not applied when it comes to long-time
“public servants” such as the Clintons.
Incorporated
but not Organized
Incorporated
on Oct. 23, 1997, just as word started to leak of Bill Clinton’s dalliance with
Monica Lewinsky and while doubts crested concerning foreign funding for the
Clinton legal defense effort, the main Clinton charity was originally named
“The William J. Clinton Presidential Foundation” in papers filed with the
Arkansas Secretary of State by three lawyers.
However,
to qualify for federal tax-exemption, a charity must be formally organized not
simply by lawyers but by, at least three truly independent directors, who
needed to adopt articles of incorporation and bylaws in a formal organizational
meeting before the entity conducted official operations. Bylaws for this entity
may not have been formally adopted by initial directors (referred to as
“Trustees”) until Dec. 23, 1997 as you can see for yourself by reviewing these
materials available through the main Clinton
Foundation website .
A
reasonable question to ask is: what did “The William J. Clinton Presidential
Foundation” do, if anything, prior to adopting bylaws, and how did they
accomplish these actions before becoming formally ''organized ``?
“Formless
aggregations of individuals” are not “organizations”
Well
before Dec. 23, 1997, Clinton allies laid groundwork required to erect the
Clinton Foundation in a portion of Little Rock that had long been run-down,
depressing local property values.
However,
the IRS explains that only “organizations” are eligible for exemption
from taxes, not “formless aggregations of individuals”:
“An individual, partnership, or formless
aggregation of individuals, however, cannot qualify for exemption under IRC
501(c)(3). If it is determined that no organization exists, the applicant will
be advised that no ruling or determination letter can be issued [emphasis
added].”
Newspaper
accounts, court records and other publicly available information show that
early efforts on behalf of the “Clinton Foundation” were not conducted in
corporate form, but instead loosely and informally, chiefly by Clinton
political supporters.
For
example, on Nov. 7, 1997, City of Little Rock public
meeting notes state:
“[Little Rock] Mayor Dailey said he received word
from Skip Rutherford, local coordinator for the Presidential Library at 7:00
AM, that President and Mrs. Clinton has selected the site along the Arkansas
River in Little Rock as the location for the proposed William Jefferson Clinton
Presidential Library [emphasis added].”
In
this C-SPAN clip, Rutherford is clearly seen explaining widespread activities
carried out through Nov. 7, 1997:
In
1997, and for years afterward, Bill and Hillary Clinton were not lawfully
designated directors, trustees, officers, or agents of the purported legal
entity that was supposed to operate the presidential library and research
center only in Little Rock.
How
did Bill and Hillary Clinton have lawful authority to pick the site for Bill’s
presidential library?
Moreover,
did The William J. Clinton Presidential Foundation even exist as a lawfully
organized corporate entity in 1997?
Admissions
Against Interest
Under
siege late in 1997, in 1998, and then safely through the Impeachment trial by
early 1999, the Clinton team must have been sure that loyal elements within the
Arkansas Attorney General’s office, the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S.
Attorney General’s office would never prosecute those responsible for operating
the Clinton Foundation illegally so long as the Clintons remained resident
inside the White House.
Though
required to do so, the Clinton Foundation never filed an informational return
(on Form 990, or 990EZ) for the “short period” from Oct. 23, 1997 through Dec.
31, 1997. This is important because, somehow, the Clinton Foundation acquired
financial resources sufficient to pay lawyers and fund operations starting late
in October. And a key unanswered question remains: “who advanced them the money?”
In
a report to Michigan government authorities, filed in July 1998, Rutherford
explained why the Clinton Foundation did not file an IRS Form 990 or 990EZ for
1997 because:
“The organization [was] not in existence last
fiscal year--[Not Applicable] [emphasis added].”
In
the second informational return the Clinton Foundation ultimately did file with
the IRS for 1999, on Nov. 20, 2000, an officer of the entity admitted , under penalties of perjury:
“The Foundation began operations in 1998
[emphasis added] and is in the early stages of raising funds to meet the exempt
purposes. Program development is in the very early planning stage and no significant
program service expenses have been incurred.”
So,
The William J. Clinton Presidential Foundation did not exist in 1997, even as
elements within the IRS rushed to grant federal tax-exemption to the entity
back to Oct. 23, 1997 as this “ Determination
Letter ,” found on the Clinton Foundation website
clearly states.
Times
were certainly different from 1997 through 2000, but we remember when the IRS
rigorously and ruthlessly
enforced key charity laws and regulations
under President Obama.
Are
former Presidents above the law?
Stillborn
in 1997, the Clinton Foundation has managed to grow into a network of entities,
none of which has ever lawfully been organized or operated. This allegation is
now supported by some 200
podcasts , averaging two hours in length each,
most of which are accompanied by pull-down slide presentations that readily
take viewers and should take investigators into details of what seems to be the
largest set of unprosecuted charity frauds in history:
Bob
Mueller, James Comey and Rod Rosenstein may have “missed” the early development
of this scam, from 2001 through 2005 when the FBI and DOJ
“investigated” the Clinton Foundation as
these redacted records reveal.
And,
on the 10th anniversary of devastating disasters that flattened portions of
Haiti, Hillary Clinton actually crowed about US Attorney John Huber’s
unconfirmed decision to wind down the latest “investigation” of potential
Clinton Foundation crimes:
✔
Donate today and
help us continue creating economic opportunity, improving public health, and
inspiring civic engagement and service.
bbis.clintonfoundation.org
9:30 AM
- Jan 12, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
39.9K
people are talking about this
The
Clinton Foundation’s record of exploiting natural disasters to source funds for
which they never account is as long as it is shameless.
Americans
across the political spectrum must push our government authorities to hold operators
of the Clinton charity scam network to account.
“Bleachbit”
notwithstanding, overwhelming evidence of unprosecuted charity frauds dating to
Oct. 23, 1997 hides in plain sight
Check
applicable laws, then check facts for yourselves and remember these words from
John Adams:
“Facts are stubborn things [emphasis added];
and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our
passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
During
the 2016 election cycle, the mainstream media failed to probe the heart of
the more recent Clinton Foundation
scandal -- how the Clinton family may have
exploited Hillary’s position as Secretary of State and her standing as
presidential frontrunner through November 2016.
Building
fortunes through operating charities is a monstrous affront to decent,
law-abiding people of all political persuasions, so it is not a partisan thing,
here, to attack the Clintons for their known public record of transgressions.
In
fact, a better question might be to wonder why Democrats, including Bernie
Sanders, are not much more insistent that ongoing Clinton charity scams be
fully exposed, and aggressively prosecuted by state, federal and foreign governments.
Our
Russia Collusion Nightmare: All Hillary's Fault?
By J.B. Shurk
The
biggest political scandal in the history of the United States. Three
years of constant lies told by government agents, political operatives, and
deceitful news personalities. Thousands of hours of criminal
investigative interviews; thousands of written stories and television segments;
thousands of leaks and insinuations and threats. All to take down the
legitimately elected American president, Donald J. Trump.
Now
that some light is finally revealing just how rotten this whole nonsense has
been from the very beginning, the most maddening aspect of all is the one thing
not said nearly enough: every bit of this frame-up job to hang the American
president for being a Russian agent and traitor to his nation began as a way to
inoculate Hillary Clinton from her largest political vulnerabilities going into
the 2016 campaign.
Aside
from her questionable health and a lifetime of scandal, Hillary had two sizable
liabilities (of her own creation) that threatened her ability to win the
general election: (1) her use of the Clinton Foundation as a vehicle for
laundering bribes from foreign governments and moneyed interests and (2) her
decision to conduct the business of the State Department (as well as to discuss
our nation's most guarded secrets) on an unsecured private email server that
had been hacked by known and unknown foreign governments and adverse entities. Peter
Schweizer's Clinton Cash did a remarkable job exposing the Clinton Foundation as
a spectacular pay-to-play operation that had allowed Hillary to trade the
powers of her office for personal aggrandizement (including the sale of 20% of
America's uranium to Russia for, among other things, $145 million transferred
to her foundation). And even though the Obama Justice Department was
doing its best to minimize the revelation of Hillary's gross breach of national
security and slow-walk any repercussions, the American people were discovering
that life-and-death secrets had been entrusted to a person with such disregard
for our well-being that she stored them on a personal server in a downstairs
bathroom.
For
a normal person with a modicum of ethical concern, sense of shame, or patriotic
duty, these crimes would have been more than sufficient to prompt withdrawal
from an election for the country's highest office. This type of
honest self-reflection and private admission of guilt is alien to the Clintons,
though, so what would have represented immovable obstacles to anyone else
became just another set of political variables that had to be neutralized in
her favor.
I
can just imagine the conversation Hillary had with her most trusted advisers —
not the ones with the official titles like Robby Mook and Brian Fallon, whose
chief value lay in their expendable nature and the ease with which Hillary
could roll them up into any unexpected scandal to be disposed with the trash at
a future time of her convenience. I mean the real group of
confidants, the ones who have "the ends justify the means" tattooed
on their souls and have gotten away with more crimes than we'll ever
know. If you're Sid Blumenthal or John Podesta or Cheryl Mills or
Marc Elias or Lanny Davis and you know where some of the bodies are buried
along the spectacular trail of Clinton corruption through the years, then the
prospect of a massive pay-to-play scandal or criminal indictment for
mishandling top-secret intelligence or engaging wittingly or unwittingly in
espionage is just another bump on the long road of progressive relativism and
Clinton nihilism. If Clinton Cash and FBI investigators come knocking, you
simply accuse all your political opponents of being the real grifters and
foreign agents.
That's
exactly what Team Hillary did. They leveled allegations of criminal
bribery at Jeb Bush; they questioned Marco Rubio's loyalty to the United
States; but Donald Trump was the prize. A man who had spent a
lifetime in the exotic world of luxury real estate around the globe while
mixing it up with all kinds of powerful figures in that often shady world was
the ideal mark, and he also happened to be a political novice who the Democrats
universally believed would lose in a landslide of historical dimensions for
political lore long to come. When Paul Manafort joined his team just
before the kickoff to the general election and brought with him a lifetime of
political baggage that included skullduggery around Russia's zone of interest,
it must have seemed as if Christmas had come early for the Clinton
team. (Kind of makes you wonder how coincidental this unforced error
really was.)
And
so, after a lifetime in the public eye, starring in a popular television show,
and rubbing elbows with celebrities and politicians of all stripes, Donald
Trump woke up one day to find himself being generally slandered (and libeled)
as a Russian spy by the information merchants who control America's airwaves
and print media. That had to have made him laugh, considering that
the press had spent most of his foray into politics demeaning him as a greedy
capitalist playboy nationalist who selfishly placed America's interests before
those of our common world.
Yes,
before John Brennan devised a global espionage ring to frame President Trump as
a national security risk and enable the FBI to open up counterintelligence
investigations into his political associates; before Jim Comey and Andrew
McCabe attested to false information with the FISA Court; before Robert Mueller
put the screws to General Flynn in order to sink a lifetime defender of America
for political purposes; before President Obama initiated changes to security
classification that opened up scurrilous investigative records on
President-Elect Trump to an exponentially greater number of bureaucrats with
partisan motivations; before Susan Rice left an electronic CYA memorandum at
12:15 P.M. on Inauguration Day of 2017 noting that Sally Yates and James
Clapper and John Brennan and Joe Biden and Jim Comey had all agreed in the Oval
Office with President Obama to continue any investigations "by the
book"; before Samantha Power unmasked hundreds of names picked up during
the course of electronic surveillance that were deemed to somehow implicate the
new president in wrongdoing; even before the Clinton operatives and Fusion GPS
and Christopher Steele first started composing the fan fiction now known as
"the Dossier" — before all of this and everything else we have been
forced to endure for three long years, there was Hillary Clinton, doing what
she and her people know best: accusing her political opponent of the very
crimes she had committed herself.
As
awful as this orchestrated campaign against President Trump has been, it is
absolutely maddening to realize that none of it would have happened had Hillary
Clinton not engaged in one of the greatest pay-for-play operations in American
history while placing our most guarded secrets (as well as the very lives of
our soldiers and civilians) on a silver platter for those governments and adversaries
who wish us the most harm in this world. Three years of Russian
hysteria happened only because of the deep corruption of Hillary Clinton.
This
scheme of political projection and wicked treachery should go down as a final
reminder that America survives today only because President Trump managed to
prevail against the nearly insurmountable wave of our government's intelligence
agencies, the justice system, media propagandists, and the combined wills of
the Democrats and NeverTrump Republicans intending to swamp him.
Only six
percent of the billions of dollars the "Foundation" takes in goes to
charity. The rest subsidizes the lavish lifestyles of the Clintons
and their sycophants; those people who have sold their souls to rub shoulders
with unadulterated power.
Clinton Foundation Put On Watch
List Of Suspicious ‘Charities’
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/04/charity-navigator-clinton-foundation.html
"But what the
Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the
American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it
to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal.
Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every
person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy
Clinton
Foundation bleeding money with no Clintons in high office
By Thomas Lifson
The Bill,
Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation can no longer raise enough money to
cover its expenses, ever since Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign failed
to propel her into an office from which she could dispense political favors.
Clinton Foundation reports to the IRS for the last two tax years have
demonstrated that without anyone to grant boons, fewer donors are interested in
supporting it.
Andrew
Stiles reports for the Free Beacon :
The Clinton Foundation reported a loss of more than $16 million in
2018, according to newly released tax records , marking the second consecutive year of losses since Hillary
Clinton's humiliating defeat to President Donald J. Trump in 2016.
The foundation reported total revenue of just $30.7 million,
including $24.2 million worth of grants and contributions, a record low for the
alleged "charity." That figure was well short of the foundation's
total expenses for the year—$47.5 million— resulting in a net loss of $16.8
million.
The previous year, the Clinton Foundation reported a net loss of
$16.1 million. In total, the organization has lost a staggering $32.9 million
since Hillary Clinton's lifelong quest for the presidency crumbled to dust in
November 2016.
The
contrast with previous years when political favors were a lure is striking:
The Clinton Foundation posted its highest revenue haul ($249
million) in 2009, the year Hillary was sworn in as President Barack Obama's
secretary of state. By 2013, the foundation had reported an additional $392.2
million in revenue, and went on to raise $344.4 million between 2014 and 2016.
Between 2008 and 2016, the Clinton Foundation reported total
revenue in excess of $1.1 billion, or an annual average of $130.4 million.
Needless to say, Clinton's stunning failure to defeat Donald Trump in the 2016
election appears to have had a significant impact on the foundation's ability
to raise money.
US Attorney
for Utah, John Huber, has been tasked with investigating the Clinton
Foundation. So far there has not been a single leak out of his office over its
work. That could mean either that they have turned up nothing, or that the
investigation and grand jury are proceeding with the secrecy that the law
demands.
VIDEO:
THE
FRAUDULENT CLINTON FOUNDATION EXPOSED.
PAY-TO-PLAY
FROM THE FIRST DAY!
https://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2019/01/sucking-in-bribes-dirty-story-of-two-of.html
Is it a signal that she's back in the game because she's
selling her president-ability to the world's global billionaire crowd and
laying the groundwork for more funds? There are all kinds of ways
for foreign billionaires to get money to the U.S. without consequences, after
all. What's more, it's pretty much the biggest base of support she
has, which is at least one reason why she lost the 2016 election.
“The couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public
service” into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth,
with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was
a political machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This
consists essentially of a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big
business support for the Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their
personal fortunes.
The basic components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall
Street and Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and
donations to the ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”
HILLARY &
BILLARY AND RED CHINA!
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2016/10/white-house-is-like-subway-you-have-to.html
“Facilitating
strategic technology transfer in return for money is an old Clinton game.
The Chinese bought their way to access of considerable space technology
when Bill Clinton was president. Remember Charlie Trie, Loral, and the
rest of the crew?”
THE
CLINTONS AND RED CHINA:
A
MONEY MAKING TRAITORSHIP!
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2018/08/who-are-bigger-servants-of-red-china.html
"Ask
Jeff Sessions about the charges. Money was flowing into the Clinton
Foundation from all over the world, disguised, rerouted through a Canadian
charity, all to obscure its origins."
AMERICAN
PREDATORS:
THE BRIBES
SUCKING LIVES OF HILLARY & BILLARY
The Clintons have been a criminal enterprise since they came to power in
Arkansas. The list of scandals they have generated is long and
tawdry. Their principal goal then and now has always been to enrich
themselves. They never once had a moral compunction about lying,
cheating, selling, and stealing their way to wealth. They are the Perons
of America. They eventually set up a "foundation" and the
money kept rolling in.
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2016/08/the-clinton-foundation-for-sucking-in.html
Only six percent of the billions of dollars the
"Foundation" takes in goes to charity. The rest subsidizes
the lavish lifestyles of the Clintons and their sycophants; those people who
have sold their souls to rub shoulders with unadulterated power.
THE
SHADY POLITICS OF HILLARY CLINTON and her PAY-TO-PLAY MAFIA
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2018/09/had-hillary-clinton-won-election-left.html
The left cared nothing about that bit of collusion.
Hillary and her campaign aides have long been involved with Russia
for reasons of personal gain. Clinton herself got $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation for allowing Russia
to take over twenty percent of all uranium production in the U.S . Her campaign chairman, John Podesta, is reaping the financial
benefits of being on the board of a Russian company, Joule, which he did not disclose . PATRICIA McCARTHY
Had Hillary been elected, the Clinton Foundation would be raking
in even more millions than it did before. She would be happily selling
access, favors and our remaining freedoms out from under us. PATRICIA McCARTHY
THE
PHONY CLINTON FOUNDATION CHARITY slush fund
https://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2018/12/global-grifters-clintons-phony-charity.html
“There
is no controlling Bill
Clinton . He does whatever he wants
and runs up incredible expenses with foundation funds,” states a separate
interview memo attached to the submission.
“Bill
Clinton mixes and matches his personal
business
with that of the foundation. Many
people
within the foundation have tried to
caution
him about this but he does not listen,
and
there really is no talking to him,” the
memo
added.
No comments:
Post a Comment