HAVEN’T
WE YET LEARNED ABOUT LAWYERS? THAT THEY ARE AMORAL SOCIOPATHS? LOOK AT HILLARY
BILLARY CLINTON AND THE OBOMBS!
The Real Kamala Harris
So
Joe Biden has picked the runt of the litter, an also-ran loser in the
Democratic primaries who never one a primary, barely escaped sitting at the
kiddies table, whom the voters didn’t think was qualified to be president, yet
whom Biden wanted to be a heartbeat away. Or maybe his puppet masters,
the voices in his earpiece, and the voices in his head picked her from a list
loaded with more baggage than an airport carousel.
BLOG EDITOR: NAME EVEN ON THING OBAMA-BIDEN DID FOR BLACK AMERICA AS THEY SABOTAGED U.S.
BORDERS AND JOBS FOR LA RAZA!
Biden
picked a running mate who labeled him a racist opponent of school busing who
cavorted and collaborated with segregationist Democrat colleagues in the Senate
where Biden supported legislation leading to the incarceration of young black
males.
Of course, Harris did her part in incarcerating young black males with a
vengeance as states attorney in San Francisco and attorney general of
California.
Kamala
Harris also believes Biden is a sexual predator, saying we should believe his
accusers, even staffer Tara Reade, who has credibly accused him of sexual
assault. Reade certainly brings more evidence to the table than Brett
Kavanaugh’s accuser, whom Harris viciously attacked in one of the most unhinged
attempts at character assassination we have ever seen.
Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) said Tuesday that
she believes women who say they felt uncomfortable after receiving unwanted
touching from former Vice President Joe Biden.
“I believe them and I respect them being able to
tell their story and having the courage to do it,” Harris said during a
presidential campaign event in Nevada in April 2019 before Biden had officially entered
the race.
As PJ Media reports:
And then there’s Tara Reade, in 2019, she said
that Biden used to touch her inappropriately while she was a staffer in his
Senate office in 1993. “He used to put his hand on my shoulder and run his
finger up my neck,” Reade said. “I would just kind of freeze and wait for him
to stop doing that.” She later expanded on those allegations, claiming in March
2020 that Biden sexually assaulted her by pushing her up against the wall,
kissing her and sliding his hand up her shirt and up her skirt. Reade says
attempted to file a claim, but Biden was ultimately protected by loyalists on
his staff. The credibility of her claims was boosted by the release of a clip
of the Larry King Live show during which her mother called in anonymously
asking the panel for advice on how to handle a situation with her daughter and
a prominent U.S. senator. Kamala Harris may have believed Tara Reade before Joe
Biden jumped in the race, but when Biden was the frontrunner and then
presumptive nominee, she ignored Reade’s sexual assault allegations when they
resurfaced in 2020.
All
Trump has to do is take clips from their debate exchanges and attacks on
Biden from Kamala’s interviews and append the tag line, “I’m Donald J. Trump
and I approve her message.”
Harris’
well-rehearsed attack on Joe Biden that nearly derailed his candidacy during
the clown-car Democratic presidential debates should have come as no surprise
to those who have watched her rise to political prominence. Never mind its
relevance or accuracy. For Harris, the ends always justify the means.
For
a time it looked as if Harris wasn’t even on the short list, consistently
failing to make the top tier in the Democratic presidential primary debates,
after being ignored in either another Biden brain cramp or deliberate snub in
which he called former Illinois Sen. Carol Moseley Braun the only
African-American woman to serve in the Senate, and after a heated attack from Harris during a
debate regarding Biden’s record on school busing:
The debate-stage skirmish was one of the seminal
moments of the Democratic primary. Harris, who is Black, said Biden made “very
hurtful” comments about his past work with segregationist senators before she
slammed his opposition to busing as schools began to integrate.
“There was a little girl in California who was a
part of the second class to integrate her public schools, and she was bused to
school every day,” she said. “And that little girl was me.”
At the time, Biden called her comments “a
mischaracterization of my position.”
Biden’s
pick of Harris fulfills Biden’s identity-politics decision to pick a “woman of
color” although Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the fake Cherokee Indian, could have
qualified. Harris is glib, if not articulate, a stark contrast to a Biden who
can’t complete a sentence or remember where he is. It comes as Biden steadily slips among
minority voters.
More great news for the Trump campaign.
Blacks and Minority voters are at record highs for President Trump.
Rasmussen Reports released their latest polling
of likely black voters of President Trump’s job approval is now over 40%:
If
Trump gets just 20% of the African-American, vote it is curtains for the
Democrats and a landslide for Trump. Biden’s patronizing of
African-Americans is typified by his arguably racist and demeaning remark that
if blacks do not vote for him, they are not in fact black.
For
eight years Obama-Biden did nothing while Kamala Harris, as a former California
state attorney general and San Francisco district attorney, did measurable harm to the community
she claims to be a leader of.
She is counting on strong support from African
Americans. But many black voters are wary of her 27 years as a prosecutor
enforcing laws that sent African Americans to prison…
Still, her home state’s high rate of
incarcerating people of color goes a long way in explaining the trouble she has
had selling her candidacy to black voters nationwide. In California and many
other states, racial disparities in imprisonment have intensified resentments
of what many see as deeply ingrained discrimination in America’s criminal
justice system…
But the prisons remain emblematic of chronic
racial inequities in the justice system. African Americans make up less than 6%
of California’s population but 29% of its inmates, according to the state
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Latinos are 39% of the population
but 43% of the inmates.
Tucker
Carlson of Fox News calls Harris a corrupt and dangerous fraud who sees laws
and powers only as means to punish her enemies, pursue her agenda, and get
elected. As Carlson noted:
"The wrap on Harris in exit polls is that
she’s a fraud," Carlson said. "She doesn’t really believe in
anything, she'll say whatever it takes. Of course, that is also Harris’s
primary strength."
Kamala
Harris, like Biden, support Planned Parenthood’s crimes against the unborn and
takes money and endorsements from the abortion industry. One remembers her
resorting to lies, falsehoods and innuendo in the Supreme Court confirmation
hearing for Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Biden is dangerous because he will let
others control him and run the show. Harris is worse. She will know what she’s
doing and will do it with astounding relish and ruthlessness,
As
Sen. Cory Booker’s “Spartacus moment” fizzled, Harris knew an “Elmer Gantry
moment” when she saw one. As Jonathan S. Tobin noted in National Review:
She first earned notoriety in the Senate last
year by demonstrating open incivility bordering on bullying when she
interrogated Attorney General Jeff Sessions and the national-intelligence
chiefs. Bullying witnesses and cutting them off before they have a chance to
answer is her modus operandi during hearings…
The same qualities were on display during her
questioning of Kavanaugh. But while, like the other Democrats, she never
succeeding in outsmarting the judge, she was the only one to momentarily
flummox him by bringing up the Mueller investigation.
She started with an impossibly general and
specious query about whether he had ever discussed the Mueller probe with
“anyone.”…by asserting, even by implication, that Kavanaugh might somehow be
part of the Russia-collusion discussion, Harris gave liberal Democrats exactly
the kind of red meat they crave.
Along with her snide and disrespectful
prosecutorial tone, that made her the winner of the first day of the Kavanaugh
primary.
But
Harris did more than badger, mislead, and imply in her attempt to slander
Kavanaugh. Harris circulated a deceptively edited video designed to further her
narrative that far from being an originalist that would apply the law fairly on
any case, including those involving abortion, Kavanaugh was an active
participant in the campaign to repeal Roe V. Wade. As Ashe Schow noted in the Daily Wire:
Harris’ Twitter account put out a clip that
appeared to show Kavanaugh referring to birth control blanketly as
“abortion-inducing drugs.”
This is clearly deceptive, as it’s obvious this
was not the beginning of one of Kavanaugh’s answers. Kavanaugh’s full sentence,
which would have only required one or two extra seconds had Harris’ team
started at the beginning, made it clear he was summarizing what a party in a
Supreme Court case said.
Kavanaugh said, "In that case, they said filling
out the form would make them complicit in the provision of the
abortion-inducing drugs that they were, as a religious matter, objected
to." (Emphasis added.)
Harris
was willing to falsify evidence to slander Kavanaugh and push the false
narrative that Kavanaugh was just another pro-lifer waging a war on women.
As she tweeted:
Kavanaugh chooses his words very carefully, and
this is a dog whistle for going after birth control. He was nominated for the
purpose of taking away a woman’s constitutionally protected right to make her
own health care decisions. Make no mistake - this is about punishing women.
Make
no mistake -- her abuse of Kavanaugh and Biden was about advancing the career
of Kamala Harris. Ironically, she owes her advancement to her
association with former Democratic Speaker of the California Assembly Willie
Brown. As the Washington Examiner noted:
Kamala Harris’ first significant political role
was an appointment by her powerful then-boyfriend Willie Brown, three decades
her senior, to a California medical board that has been criticized as a landing
spot for patronage jobs and kickbacks.
Then 30, Harris was dating 60-year-old Willie
Brown, at the time the Democratic speaker of the California State Assembly,
when he placed her on the California Medical Assistance Commission in 1994. The
position paid over $70,000 per year, $120,700 in current money, and Harris
served on the board until 1998.
The medical commission met twice a month, and
Harris, a United States senator for California since 2017 and now a 2020
Democratic presidential candidate, missed about 20% of the meetings each year…
Hey,
politics makes strange bedfellows, as they say. Can we count her as a hardcore
feminist then? Conservative Twitter icon James Wood has dubbed her
#HeelsUpHarris, Kamala Harris is a dangerous and malevolent political
opportunist who doesn’t belong in the same zip code as the White House -- and
the Lincoln Bedroom.
Photo credit: YouTube screen grab
(cropped).
Daniel John Sobieski is a former
editorial writer for Investor’s Business Daily and
freelance writer whose pieces have appeared in Human Events, Reason Magazine,
and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.
12 Aug 2020603
6:31
Joe Biden announced Tuesday he has
chosen Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) as his running mate, a person the presumptive Democrat
nominee described as a
“fearless fighter for the little guy, and one of the country’s finest public
servants.”
During Harris’s tenure as San Francisco’s chief prosecutor,
however, she showed no signs of fighting for “the little guy” when she failed
to prosecute any of the sexual abuse claims brought against Catholic priests in
the city, despite outcries from victim groups.
In fact, as Breitbart News senior contributor Peter Schweizer,
president of the Government Accountability Institute, observed in his book
titled Profiles
in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite, during her 13-year tenure as
district attorney and then attorney general, Harris failed to prosecute even
one case of priest sexual abuse, though during that same period at least 50
major cities had brought charges against priests.
At the same time Harris failed to pursue prosecution of cases of
priest sexual abuse, her office “would strangely hide vital records on abuses
that had occurred,” Schweizer revealed.
The bombshell details show that while Harris’s predecessor,
former San Francisco District Attorney Terence Hallinan, had launched an
aggressive investigation into priests of the Archdiocese of San Francisco
accused of sexual abuse, Harris’s campaign to unseat Hallinan showed an unusual
influx of unparalleled donations from high-level officials of the Catholic
Church.
Schweizer wrote:
Harris had no particular ties to the Catholic Church or Catholic
organizations, but the money still came in large, unprecedented sums. Lawyer
Joseph Russoniello represented the church on a wide variety of issues,
including the handling of the church abuse scandal. He served on the Catholic
Church’s National Review Board (NRB) of the U.S. Conference of Catholic
Bishops. The purpose of the NRB was to review Catholic Church abuse cases.
Russoniello was also a partner in the San Francisco law firm Cooley Godward.
Russoniello donated the maximum amount by law to her campaign, $1,250, and his
law firm added another $2,250. He also sat on Harris’s advisory council when
she was San Francisco district attorney. Another law firm, Bingham McCutcheon,
which handled legal matters for the archdiocese concerning Catholic Charities,
donated $2,825, the maximum allowed. Curiously, Bingham McCutcheon had only
donated to two other candidates running for office in San Francisco before, for
a total of $650. As with Russoniello, their support was unusual.
In addition to campaign donations from multiple law firms
defending San Francisco priests against abuse claims, Schweizer observed that
“board members of San Francisco Catholic archdiocese-related organizations and
their family members donated another $50,950 to Harris’s campaign.”
As Schweizer noted, Harris’s ties to those working to block
exposure of the archdiocese’s secret documents containing information about
priests accused of sexual abuse were extensive.
The author explained that attorney Paul Renne of Cooley Godward
was the husband of former San Francisco city attorney Louise Renne, a mentor to
Harris. Paul Renne worked with lawyer Joseph Russoniello, who, as Schweizer
wrote, “negotiated the agreement to bury the abuse records from public view.”
Though Harris has touted her early career as a sexual crimes
prosecutor, after she won her run-off campaign against Hallinan, her office
actually worked to cover up the records of claims of sexual abuse by priests of
the San Francisco archdiocese.
According to Schweizer:
Hallinan’s office had used the archdiocese files to guide its
investigations and talked publicly about releasing the documents after removing
victims’ names and identifiers. Harris, on the other hand, abruptly decided to
bury the records. For some reason, she did not want the documents released in
any form. Harris’s office claimed that the cover-up was about protecting the
victims of abuse. “District Attorney Harris focuses her efforts on putting
child molesters in prison,” her office claimed. “We’re not interested in
selling out our victims to look good in the paper.”
Victims’ groups, however, were quite eager for the documents to
be released.
“They were outraged by her actions,” Schweizer noted. “Far from
protecting victims, they argued, the cover-up was actually protecting the
abusers by keeping their alleged crimes secret.”
“They’re full of shit,” Joey Piscitelli, the northwest regional
director of Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests (SNAP), said, reported
Schweizer. “You can quote me on that. They’re not protecting the victims.”
Similarly, attorney Rick Simons, who represented victims of
clergy sexual abuse, said Harris’s action of covering up the documents “shows a
pattern and practice and policy of ignoring the rights of children by one of
the largest institutions of the city and county of San Francisco, and in the
Bay Area.”
When Harris attempted to shift the blame for hiding the records
to Hallinan, her predecessor responded that she engaged in “the kinds of deals
that have allowed the church sex scandal to go on as long as it has.”
As a result of Harris’s efforts to cover up the documents,
Schweizer wrote that psychologist James Jenkins, who founded the archdiocese’s
Independent Review Board – which oversaw the methods to handle abuse claims –
“abruptly resigned from the board”:
He accused the church of “deception, manipulation and control”
for blocking the release of the board’s findings. Jenkins argued that Harris’s
deal with the archdiocese not only denied the rights of known victims, it also
prevented other possible cases from coming forward.
In April 2010, Schweizer reported Harris’s office denied a
request from a San Francisco
Weekly journalist who sought the archdiocese’s abuse records.
Similarly, Schweizer wrote he requested the same documents in 2019, through an
attorney in California.
“The San Francisco district attorney’s office responded they no
longer had them in their possession,” he noted.
“Were they destroyed? Were they moved somewhere else?” Schweizer
asked. “It remains a disturbing mystery.”
Schweizer: Harris
Engaged in ‘a Massive Cover-Up’ of Alleged Clergy Sex Abuse
1,056
1:56
On Wednesday’s
broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” Breitbart News
senior contributor and Government Accountability Institute President Peter
Schweizer stated that 2020 Democratic vice presidential candidate Sen. Kamala
Harris (D-CA) engaged in a “massive cover-up” of alleged sexual abuse against
Catholic priests.
He explained that many “law
firms and lawyers and people connected to the church hierarchy” financed the
Harris campaign.
Schweizer said Harris did “not
well at all, particularly on very sensitive, explosive cases, including child
sexual abuse.”
“Tucker, from 2004 to 2011, she
was San Francisco attorney general,” he continued. “She did not prosecute a
single case of sexual abuse involving Catholic Church priests. To put that in
context, of the 50 largest cities in America, all 50 of them prosecuted at
least one case during that time period, except for Kamala Harris. And in
addition to that, she inherited, from her predecessor, Terence Hallinan,
hundreds of pages of internal Catholic documents that included the names of 40
current or recent priests who had been charged by parishioners with
molestation.”
“Hallinan was using those
documents to build criminal cases, and he was also planning to release them
after redacting the names of victims,” Schweizer added. “Kamala Harris actually
deep-sixed that document and froze those documents, and those documents
disappeared, much to the chagrin of victims’ groups. So, it’s a massive
cover-up. And a lot of the people that financed her campaign to beat Hallinan
were law firms and lawyers and people connected to the church hierarchy, who
did not want that — those documents to come out.”
Follow Ian Hanchett
on Twitter @IanHanchett
No comments:
Post a Comment