THE REASON AMERICA ENDED UP WITH THE LIFE-LONG WHITE-COLLAR CRIMINAL DONALD TRUMP IS BECAUSE THEY KNEW HILLARY CLINTON WOULD BE EVEN A GRATER THREAT.
History will thank Trump (and Obama) for keeping Hillary Clinton out of office
by Noemie
Emery, Contributor |
Win or may lose in
November, there is one thing for which people will forever praise President
Trump: Just when it counted, at the moment of crisis with all on the line, he
threw his body into the line of incoming fire — and prevented Hillary Clinton from
becoming president.
Deserving of thanks also is President Barack Obama, who in
the 2008 primary defeated Clinton and kept her out of office through his two
terms until Trump could step up to the job. The importance of what these people
did becomes more impressive when one recalls that the plot to make Clinton
president, whether she had earned it or not, had been decades in the making.
Some say it stemmed from the 1980s in Arkansas, or even before that, when she
and her husband met at Yale.
BLOG EDITOR: HILLARY
FAILED IN ANY ENDEAVOR SHE ATTEMPTED OTHER THAN PAY-TO-PLA BRIBES SUCKING.
“Two for the price of one!" the pair chirped while
campaigning in 1992, (happily described as the "Year of the Woman"),
while Hillary was sold as a "New Kind of First Lady," seemingly
meaning a sort of co-president, until healthcare blew up in her face. With
that, she retired into more traditional duties.
Until, of course, she was called on again during the Monica
Lewinsky scandal, which made her sympathetic at once to "traditional
women," whom she at the beginning appeared to despise. And then at the
end, she became "the wronged woman," (as opposed to the wrong one),
sold as the victim-survivor deserving of everyone’s praise.
Because she had been forced to listen in excruciating
detail to every last fact of her husband’s betrayal, she was given a seat in
the Senate representing New York (which she never had lived in) and a fast
track to her party’s nomination for president in 2008. With a record of failure
on healthcare and no big bills or notable stands or speeches in the Senate, she
was considered a shoo-in for president in 2008 — until derailed by the freight
train called Obama, a uniquely gifted aspirational speaker whose life story and
talents surpassed Clinton's own.
Setting her sights at once on 2016, she put in her time as
a member of his Cabinet to gain more experience and made sure, with the help of
her husband, that she would not be blindsided again. People who
"deserted" her in 2008 for the dashing young stranger faced primary
challenges where they didn’t expect them, or didn’t get funded, or saw promised
funds not appear. Protected for too long by too many people, she was allowed
once to try in 2008, failed, and then was encouraged to run all over again,
this time with no legitimate competition running against her, and the winds of
the world at her back.
Someday, historians will look back and try to explain just
how and why the Republican field of 2016, with its young, diverse field of
brilliant young people, managed to end up with Trump after much deep confusion.
At the same time, the Democrats of 2020 had much the same field of comers but
ended up with Rep. James Clyburn blowing the whistle and telling them to calm
down and settle on Joe Biden before they ended up with any one of a large,
noisy number of Biden's competitors.
Perhaps starting out with a large, diverse field of young
people who haven’t been tested is not the best model. Now we just have to find
one that is.
The Most Egregious Series of 'Corrupt Acts' Ever
By Jack Cashill
“The evidence points in the direction of the
president inviting Ukraine to engage in the corrupt acts of investigating a US
political opponent,” House manager Adam Schiff told the U.S. Senate about a
thousand times last week.
A master dissembler, Schiff said whatever he had
to in his effort to remove President Trump from office. However shameful, that
was his job. The media had no excuse for enabling him. Those old enough to
remember the Clinton years know what “corrupt acts” by a sitting president
really smell like.
In 1997, the Senate Committee on Governmental
Affairs chaired by Sen. Fred Thompson laid out in broad terms the scope of
corruption that President Bill Clinton orchestrated:
The president and his
aides demeaned the offices of the president and vice president, took advantage of minority
groups, pulled down all the barriers that would normally be in place to keep
out illegal contributions, pressured policy makers, and left themselves open to
strong suspicion that they were selling not only access to high-ranking
officials, but policy as well. Millions of dollars were raised in illegal
contributions, much of it from foreign sources.
Johnny Chung described the state of affairs a bit
more colorfully. “The White House is like a subway,” he told the Thompson
committee. “You have to put in coins to open the gates.” Chung admitted to
funneling $100,000 from the Chinese Military to the Democratic National
Committee.
In the runup to the 1996 election, the Clintons
needed every dollar they could extort to rebound from their own scandalous
missteps and the Democratic Party’s drubbing in the 1994 midterms.
I could cite a score of specific outrages during
that campaign, but I will concentrate on one that, as Schiff was fond of
saying, “endangered U.S. national security.” By comparison, anything the U.S.
or the Ukraine suffered as a result of the celebrated funding “pause” was a
trifling inconvenience.
Here are a few of the other, lesser outrages during that
election cycle:
- In February 1996, Clinton met
with with Chinese arms dealer Wang Jun, a meeting greased by a $50,000
donation, a meeting even Clinton would admit was “clearly inappropriate”
but only after Wang Jun’s company was caught flooding California’s inner
cities with illegal semi-automatic weapons.
- In April 1996 Clinton sent
embattled Commerce Secretary Ron Brown to Croatia to broker a sweetheart
deal between the neo-Fascists who ran that country and the Enron Corporation.
- In April 1996, the Clinton White
House sabotaged the investigation into the inexplicable USAF plane crash
that killed Brown and 34 others.
- In July 1996, the White House
orchestrated a cover-up of the accidental missile strike on TWA Flight 800
that killed 230.
- In September 1996 Clinton
“unilaterally” declared a new 1.7 million-acre national monument in
southern Utah, in the process handing his patrons, the Riady family of
Indonesia, a monopoly on the world’s supply of low-sulfur coal.
The Pentagon welcomed the news. Just a few months
earlier, a Chinese military officer had warned American ambassador Chas
Freeman, “If you hit us now, we can hit back. So you will not make those
threats [about Taiwan].”
American technical advice was making Chinese
missile rattling more than an empty threat. And yet in their relentless drive
to raise money, the Clintons were fully prepared to broker that advice.
A month after the Long March’s failure, Clinton
signed off on a “decision memorandum” that countered the State Department
recommendations, voided Pentagon veto power, and awarded authority over
satellite-export licensing to the deeply compromised Ron Brown at Commerce.
Said an attached memo, ‘‘Industry should like the fact that they will deal with
the more ‘user friendly’ Commerce system.’’
Soon after the Long March failure Loral CEO
Bernard Schwartz dispatched a review team to China to assess the damage and
suggest refinements. Schwartz paid for the privilege. In the 1996 cycle he gave
$632,000 to the president’s reelection effort and emerged as the single largest
donor to the Democratic Party.
A House Select Committee on National Security
would later describe Schwartz’s actions as “an unlicensed defense service for
the PRC that resulted in the improvement of the reliability of the PRC’s
military rockets and ballistic missiles.”
So serious was the offense that in 1998 the
Criminal Division of the Justice Department launched an investigation.
Incredibly, while the investigation was in process, Sandy Berger, Clinton fixer
and national security advisor, sent a memo to the president urging him to
“waive the legislative restriction on the export to China of the communications
satellites and related equipment for the Space Systems/Loral (SS/L) Chinasat 8
project.”
This waiver would present a huge problem for the
prosecution. Berger admitted as much: “Justice believes that a jury would not
convict once it learned that the president had found SS/L’s Chinasat 8 project
to be in the national interest.”
But Berger was not about to let that stop him:
“We will take the firm position that this waiver does not exonerate or in any
way prejudge SS/L with respect to its prior unauthorized transfers to China.”
Berger was blowing smoke, and he knew it. A waiver would make prosecution all
but impossible.
The president could only issue a waiver, however,
if it served America’s “national interest.” Berger made a comically specious
case that it did, arguing satellite technology would give remote Chinese villagers
access “to people and ideas in democratic societies.”
For its part, Loral had no greater cause than its
own bottom line. “If a decision is not forthcoming in the next day or so, we
stand to lose the contract,” Loral lobbyist Thomas Ross wrote Berger. “In fact,
even if the decision is favorable, we will lose substantial amounts of money
with each passing day.”
So much for the national interest. Ross then
added the kicker, sure to win the president’s heart. “Bernard Schwartz had
intended to raise this issue with you at the Blair dinner, but missed you in
the crowd.” Schwartz knew he had a friend in the White House. The president
approved the waiver, and the prosecution came to naught.
Democrats like Jerry Nadler and Nancy Pelosi were
in Congress for all of this. Schiff was there for the tail end. If they were
really concerned about acts that “endangered U.S. national security” they would
have moved to impeach the traitor themselves.
Jack Cashill’s new novel, The Hunt, a political thriller
co-authored with Mike McMullen, is widely available. Signed first editions can
be had at www.TheHuntBook.com.
Clinton Foundation Put On Watch List Of Suspicious
‘Charities’
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/04/charity-navigator-clinton-foundation.html
"But what the
Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the
American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it
to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal.
Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to
every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia
McCarthy
HILLARY &
BILLARY: The Evita and Juan Peron of Wall Street
The Clinton Looting of the Poor of Haiti
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/10/the-clinton-mafia-loots-poor-of-haiti.html
“The couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in
“public service”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in
the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes. The basic
components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall Street and
Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and donations to the
ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”
IT WAS BILL
CLINTON WHO UNLEASHED WALL STREET’S BIGGEST CRIMINAL BANKSTERS…. And haven’t
they sucked up the banksters’ gratuities since?
Only Barack
Obama has serviced banksters more than Hillary and Billary!
“Clinton also failed to mention how
he and Hillary cashed in after his presidential tenure to
make themselves multimillionaires, in part by taking tens of
millions in speaking fees from Wall Street bankers.”
FROM DAY ONE THE CLINTONS HAVE BEEN A CRIME TIDAL WAVE!
Anatomy of a
Clinton Scam
“The bigger
the lie, the more likely the buy-in” -- that must be the theory underlying a
plan relentlessly executed by Bill and Hillary Clinton to suck money from the
public in support of a supposed “charity” currently known as “Bill, Hillary
& Chelsea Clinton Foundation.”
Unlike the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation that was originally funded primarily by the
Gates family, the Clinton Foundation was meant to take money from the general
public, and from governments.
So,
affairs of the Clinton Foundation were never supposed to be directed by the
Clinton family. But public records apparently prove that strict rules governing
the conduct of public charities are not applied when it comes to long-time
“public servants” such as the Clintons.
Incorporated
but not Organized
Incorporated
on Oct. 23, 1997, just as word started to leak of Bill Clinton’s dalliance with
Monica Lewinsky and while doubts crested concerning foreign funding for the
Clinton legal defense effort, the main Clinton charity was originally named
“The William J. Clinton Presidential Foundation” in papers filed with the
Arkansas Secretary of State by three lawyers.
However, to
qualify for federal tax-exemption, a charity must be formally organized not
simply by lawyers but by, at least three truly independent directors, who
needed to adopt articles of incorporation and bylaws in a formal organizational
meeting before the entity conducted official operations. Bylaws for this entity
may not have been formally adopted by initial directors (referred to as
“Trustees”) until Dec. 23, 1997 as you can see for yourself by reviewing these
materials available through the main Clinton
Foundation website.
A
reasonable question to ask is: what did “The William J. Clinton Presidential
Foundation” do, if anything, prior to adopting bylaws, and how did they
accomplish these actions before becoming formally ''organized ``?
“Formless
aggregations of individuals” are not “organizations”
Well before
Dec. 23, 1997, Clinton allies laid groundwork required to erect the Clinton Foundation
in a portion of Little Rock that had long been run-down, depressing local
property values.
However,
the IRS
explains that only “organizations” are
eligible for exemption from taxes, not “formless aggregations of individuals”:
“An individual, partnership, or formless aggregation of
individuals, however, cannot qualify for exemption under IRC 501(c)(3). If it
is determined that no organization exists, the applicant will be advised that no
ruling or determination letter can be issued [emphasis added].”
Newspaper
accounts, court records and other publicly available information show that
early efforts on behalf of the “Clinton Foundation” were not conducted in
corporate form, but instead loosely and informally, chiefly by Clinton
political supporters.
For
example, on Nov. 7, 1997, City of Little Rock public
meeting notes state:
“[Little Rock] Mayor Dailey said he received word from Skip
Rutherford, local coordinator for the Presidential Library at 7:00 AM, that
President and Mrs. Clinton has selected the site along the Arkansas River in
Little Rock as the location for the proposed William Jefferson Clinton
Presidential Library [emphasis added].”
In this
C-SPAN clip, Rutherford is clearly seen explaining widespread activities
carried out through Nov. 7, 1997:
In 1997,
and for years afterward, Bill and Hillary Clinton were not lawfully designated
directors, trustees, officers, or agents of the purported legal entity that was
supposed to operate the presidential library and research center only in Little
Rock.
How did
Bill and Hillary Clinton have lawful authority to pick the site for Bill’s
presidential library?
Moreover,
did The William J. Clinton Presidential Foundation even exist as a lawfully
organized corporate entity in 1997?
Admissions
Against Interest
Under siege
late in 1997, in 1998, and then safely through the Impeachment trial by early
1999, the Clinton team must have been sure that loyal elements within the
Arkansas Attorney General’s office, the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S.
Attorney General’s office would never prosecute those responsible for operating
the Clinton Foundation illegally so long as the Clintons remained resident
inside the White House.
Though
required to do so, the Clinton Foundation never filed an informational return
(on Form 990, or 990EZ) for the “short period” from Oct. 23, 1997 through Dec.
31, 1997. This is important because, somehow, the Clinton Foundation acquired
financial resources sufficient to pay lawyers and fund operations starting late
in October. And a key unanswered question remains: “who advanced them the
money?”
In a report
to Michigan government authorities, filed in July 1998, Rutherford explained
why the Clinton Foundation did not file an IRS Form 990 or 990EZ for 1997
because:
“The organization [was] not in existence last fiscal year--[Not Applicable]
[emphasis added].”
In the
second informational return the Clinton Foundation ultimately did file with the
IRS for 1999, on Nov. 20, 2000, an officer of the entity admitted, under penalties of perjury:
“The Foundation began operations in 1998 [emphasis added] and is
in the early stages of raising funds to meet the exempt purposes. Program
development is in the very early planning stage and no significant program
service expenses have been incurred.”
So, The
William J. Clinton Presidential Foundation did not exist in 1997, even as
elements within the IRS rushed to grant federal tax-exemption to the entity
back to Oct. 23, 1997 as this “Determination
Letter,” found on the Clinton Foundation
website clearly states.
Times were
certainly different from 1997 through 2000, but we remember when the IRS
rigorously and ruthlessly
enforced key charity laws and regulations
under President Obama.
Are former
Presidents above the law?
Stillborn
in 1997, the Clinton Foundation has managed to grow into a network of entities,
none of which has ever lawfully been organized or operated. This allegation is
now supported by some 200
podcasts, averaging two hours in length each,
most of which are accompanied by pull-down slide presentations that readily
take viewers and should take investigators into details of what seems to be the
largest set of unprosecuted charity frauds in history:
Bob
Mueller, James Comey and Rod Rosenstein may have “missed” the early development
of this scam, from 2001 through 2005 when the FBI
and DOJ “investigated” the Clinton
Foundation as these redacted records reveal.
And, on the
10th anniversary of devastating disasters that flattened portions of Haiti,
Hillary Clinton actually crowed about US Attorney John Huber’s unconfirmed
decision to wind down the latest “investigation” of potential Clinton
Foundation crimes:
This week, the Justice Department
determined that the lies that were peddled about me, my family, & @ClintonFdn are without merit.
I couldn’t be more grateful to everyone that stuck with us while we continued
to focus on the work. Let’s keep going.
https://bbis.clintonfoundation.org/2020/annual-fund-m …
TOGETHER, WE CONTINUE PUTTING PEOPLE FIRST
39.9K people are talking about this
The Clinton
Foundation’s record of exploiting natural disasters to source funds for which
they never account is as long as it is shameless.
Americans
across the political spectrum must push our government authorities to hold
operators of the Clinton charity scam network to account.
“Bleachbit”
notwithstanding, overwhelming evidence of unprosecuted charity frauds dating to
Oct. 23, 1997 hides in plain sight
Check
applicable laws, then check facts for yourselves and remember these words from
John Adams:
“Facts are stubborn things [emphasis
added]; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of
our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
During
the 2016 election cycle, the mainstream media failed to probe the heart of
the more
recent Clinton Foundation scandal --
how the Clinton family may have exploited Hillary’s position as Secretary of
State and her standing as presidential frontrunner through November 2016.
Building
fortunes through operating charities is a monstrous affront to decent,
law-abiding people of all political persuasions, so it is not a partisan thing,
here, to attack the Clintons for their known public record of transgressions.
In fact, a
better question might be to wonder why Democrats, including Bernie Sanders, are
not much more insistent that ongoing Clinton charity scams be fully exposed,
and aggressively prosecuted by state, federal and foreign governments.
Our Russia Collusion Nightmare: All Hillary's Fault?
By J.B. Shurk
The biggest
political scandal in the history of the United States. Three years
of constant lies told by government agents, political operatives, and deceitful
news personalities. Thousands of hours of criminal investigative
interviews; thousands of written stories and television segments; thousands of
leaks and insinuations and threats. All to take down the
legitimately elected American president, Donald J. Trump.
Now that
some light is finally revealing just how rotten this whole nonsense has been
from the very beginning, the most maddening aspect of all is the one thing not
said nearly enough: every bit of this frame-up job to hang the American
president for being a Russian agent and traitor to his nation began as a way to
inoculate Hillary Clinton from her largest political vulnerabilities going into
the 2016 campaign.
Aside from
her questionable health and a lifetime of scandal, Hillary had two sizable
liabilities (of her own creation) that threatened her ability to win the
general election: (1) her use of the Clinton Foundation as a vehicle for
laundering bribes from foreign governments and moneyed interests and (2) her
decision to conduct the business of the State Department (as well as to discuss
our nation's most guarded secrets) on an unsecured private email server that
had been hacked by known and unknown foreign governments and adverse
entities. Peter Schweizer's Clinton
Cash did a remarkable job exposing the
Clinton Foundation as a spectacular pay-to-play operation that had allowed
Hillary to trade the powers of her office for personal aggrandizement
(including the sale of 20% of America's uranium to Russia for, among other
things, $145 million transferred to her foundation). And even though
the Obama Justice Department was doing its best to minimize the revelation of
Hillary's gross breach of national security and slow-walk any repercussions,
the American people were discovering that life-and-death secrets had been
entrusted to a person with such disregard for our well-being that she stored
them on a personal server in a downstairs bathroom.
For a
normal person with a modicum of ethical concern, sense of shame, or patriotic
duty, these crimes would have been more than sufficient to prompt withdrawal
from an election for the country's highest office. This type of
honest self-reflection and private admission of guilt is alien to the Clintons,
though, so what would have represented immovable obstacles to anyone else
became just another set of political variables that had to be neutralized in
her favor.
I can just
imagine the conversation Hillary had with her most trusted advisers — not the
ones with the official titles like Robby Mook and Brian Fallon, whose chief
value lay in their expendable nature and the ease with which Hillary could roll
them up into any unexpected scandal to be disposed with the trash at a future
time of her convenience. I mean the real group of confidants, the
ones who have "the ends justify the means" tattooed on their souls
and have gotten away with more crimes than we'll ever know. If
you're Sid Blumenthal or John Podesta or Cheryl Mills or Marc Elias or Lanny
Davis and you know where some of the bodies are buried along the spectacular
trail of Clinton corruption through the years, then the prospect of a massive
pay-to-play scandal or criminal indictment for mishandling top-secret
intelligence or engaging wittingly or unwittingly in espionage is just another
bump on the long road of progressive relativism and Clinton
nihilism. If Clinton
Cash and FBI investigators come
knocking, you simply accuse all your political opponents of being the real
grifters and foreign agents.
That's
exactly what Team Hillary did. They leveled allegations of criminal
bribery at Jeb Bush; they questioned Marco Rubio's loyalty to the United
States; but Donald Trump was the prize. A man who had spent a
lifetime in the exotic world of luxury real estate around the globe while
mixing it up with all kinds of powerful figures in that often shady world was
the ideal mark, and he also happened to be a political novice who the Democrats
universally believed would lose in a landslide of historical dimensions for
political lore long to come. When Paul Manafort joined his team just
before the kickoff to the general election and brought with him a lifetime of
political baggage that included skullduggery around Russia's zone of interest,
it must have seemed as if Christmas had come early for the Clinton
team. (Kind of makes you wonder how coincidental this unforced error
really was.)
And so,
after a lifetime in the public eye, starring in a popular television show, and
rubbing elbows with celebrities and politicians of all stripes, Donald Trump
woke up one day to find himself being generally slandered (and libeled) as a
Russian spy by the information merchants who control America's airwaves and
print media. That had to have made him laugh, considering that the
press had spent most of his foray into politics demeaning him as a greedy capitalist
playboy nationalist who selfishly placed America's interests before those of
our common world.
Yes, before
John Brennan devised a global espionage ring to frame President Trump as a
national security risk and enable the FBI to open up counterintelligence
investigations into his political associates; before Jim Comey and Andrew
McCabe attested to false information with the FISA Court; before Robert Mueller
put the screws to General Flynn in order to sink a lifetime defender of America
for political purposes; before President Obama initiated changes to security
classification that opened up scurrilous investigative records on
President-Elect Trump to an exponentially greater number of bureaucrats with
partisan motivations; before Susan Rice left an electronic CYA memorandum at
12:15 P.M. on Inauguration Day of 2017 noting that Sally Yates and James
Clapper and John Brennan and Joe Biden and Jim Comey had all agreed in the Oval
Office with President Obama to continue any investigations "by the book";
before Samantha Power unmasked hundreds of names picked up during the course of
electronic surveillance that were deemed to somehow implicate the new president
in wrongdoing; even before the Clinton operatives and Fusion GPS and
Christopher Steele first started composing the fan fiction now known as
"the Dossier" — before all of this and everything else we have been
forced to endure for three long years, there was Hillary Clinton, doing what
she and her people know best: accusing her political opponent of the very
crimes she had committed herself.
As awful as
this orchestrated campaign against President Trump has been, it is absolutely
maddening to realize that none of it would have happened had Hillary Clinton
not engaged in one of the greatest pay-for-play operations in American history
while placing our most guarded secrets (as well as the very lives of our
soldiers and civilians) on a silver platter for those governments and
adversaries who wish us the most harm in this world. Three years of
Russian hysteria happened only because of the deep corruption of Hillary
Clinton.
This scheme
of political projection and wicked treachery should go down as a final reminder
that America survives today only because President Trump managed to prevail
against the nearly insurmountable wave of our government's intelligence
agencies, the justice system, media propagandists, and the combined wills of
the Democrats and NeverTrump Republicans intending to swamp him.
Only six
percent of the billions of dollars the "Foundation" takes in goes to
charity. The rest subsidizes the lavish lifestyles of the Clintons
and their sycophants; those people who have sold their souls to rub shoulders
with unadulterated power.
Clinton
Foundation Put On Watch List Of Suspicious
‘Charities’
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/04/charity-navigator-clinton-foundation.html
"But what the Clintons do is criminal
because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel
thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their
friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs
beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by
now." ---- Patricia McCarthy
Clinton
Foundation bleeding money with no Clintons in high office
The Bill, Hillary
and Chelsea Clinton Foundation can no longer raise enough money to cover its
expenses, ever since Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign failed to propel
her into an office from which she could dispense political favors. Clinton
Foundation reports to the IRS for the last two tax years have demonstrated that
without anyone to grant boons, fewer donors are interested in supporting it.
Andrew Stiles
reports for the Free
Beacon:
The Clinton Foundation reported a loss of more than $16 million in
2018, according to newly released tax
records, marking the second consecutive
year of losses since Hillary Clinton's humiliating defeat to President Donald
J. Trump in 2016.
The foundation reported total revenue of just $30.7 million,
including $24.2 million worth of grants and contributions, a record low for the
alleged "charity." That figure was well short of the foundation's
total expenses for the year—$47.5 million— resulting in a net loss of $16.8
million.
The previous year, the Clinton Foundation reported a net loss of
$16.1 million. In total, the organization has lost a staggering $32.9 million
since Hillary Clinton's lifelong quest for the presidency crumbled to dust in
November 2016.
The contrast with
previous years when political favors were a lure is striking:
The Clinton Foundation posted its highest revenue haul ($249
million) in 2009, the year Hillary was sworn in as President Barack Obama's
secretary of state. By 2013, the foundation had reported an additional $392.2
million in revenue, and went on to raise $344.4 million between 2014 and 2016.
Between 2008 and 2016, the Clinton Foundation reported total
revenue in excess of $1.1 billion, or an annual average of $130.4 million.
Needless to say, Clinton's stunning failure to defeat Donald Trump in the 2016
election appears to have had a significant impact on the foundation's ability
to raise money.
US Attorney for
Utah, John Huber, has been tasked with investigating the Clinton Foundation. So
far there has not been a single leak out of his office over its work. That
could mean either that they have turned up nothing, or that the investigation
and grand jury are proceeding with the secrecy that the law demands.
VIDEO:
THE
FRAUDULENT CLINTON FOUNDATION EXPOSED.
PAY-TO-PLAY
FROM THE FIRST DAY!
Is it a
signal that she's back in the game because she's selling her president-ability
to the world's global billionaire crowd and laying the groundwork for more
funds? There are all kinds of ways for foreign billionaires to get
money to the U.S. without consequences, after all. What's more, it's
pretty much the biggest base of support she has, which is at least one reason
why she lost the 2016 election.
“The
couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public service” into admission
into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1
percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political machine
that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of a
seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for
the Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes.
The
basic components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall Street
and Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and donations
to the ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”
HILLARY &
BILLARY AND RED CHINA!
“Facilitating
strategic technology transfer in return for money is an old Clinton game.
The Chinese bought their way to access of considerable space technology
when Bill Clinton was president. Remember Charlie Trie, Loral, and the
rest of the crew?”
THE CLINTONS AND RED CHINA:
A MONEY MAKING TRAITORSHIP!
"Ask Jeff
Sessions about the charges. Money was flowing into the Clinton
Foundation from all over the world, disguised, rerouted through a Canadian
charity, all to obscure its origins."
AMERICAN
PREDATORS:
THE BRIBES SUCKING
LIVES OF HILLARY & BILLARY
The
Clintons have been a criminal enterprise since they came to power in
Arkansas. The list of scandals they have generated is long and
tawdry. Their principal goal then and now has always been to enrich
themselves. They never once had a moral compunction about lying,
cheating, selling, and stealing their way to wealth. They are the Perons
of America. They eventually set up a "foundation" and the
money kept rolling in.
Only
six percent of the billions of dollars the "Foundation" takes in goes
to charity. The rest subsidizes the lavish lifestyles of the
Clintons and their sycophants; those people who have sold their souls to rub
shoulders with unadulterated power.
THE
SHADY POLITICS OF HILLARY CLINTON and her PAY-TO-PLAY MAFIA
The left cared nothing about that bit of collusion.
Hillary and
her campaign aides have long been involved with Russia for reasons of personal
gain. Clinton herself got $145
million in donations to the Clinton
Foundation for allowing Russia to take over twenty percent of all uranium
production in the U.S. Her campaign
chairman, John Podesta, is reaping the financial benefits of being on the board
of a Russian company, Joule, which he did
not disclose. PATRICIA McCARTHY
Had Hillary
been elected, the Clinton Foundation would be raking in even more millions than
it did before. She would be happily selling access, favors and our
remaining freedoms out from under us. PATRICIA McCARTHY
THE PHONY
CLINTON FOUNDATION CHARITY slush fund
“There
is no controlling Bill Clinton. He does whatever he wants and runs up incredible expenses with
foundation funds,” states a separate interview memo attached to the submission.
“Bill
Clinton mixes and matches his personal
business
with that of the foundation. Many
people
within the foundation have tried to
caution
him about this but he does not listen,
and
there really is no talking to him,” the
memo
added.
The list of predicate crimes is extensive
and includes bribery, embezzlement, fraud, theft, money laundering, and
obstruction of justice.
Secretary Hillary Clinton and the Deep State: A RICO Criminal
Conspiracy
By Ron Wright
We who
elected President Trump understood our elected officials and the Deep State were sandbagging Trump and self-dealing public funds. It was
no secret that President Trump is no angel, unpresidential, blunt, and crude,
and a disruptor. Trump was hired to drain the swamp.
I watched
this kabuki
theater unfold over the last several
years. Through my eyes as a shopworn gumshoe, I will explain what is happening.
My investigative curiosity was first piqued by the ATF Fast and Furious scandal
and continues through the recent House impeachment show trial. There is a
common element running through all of these cons — the actions of an
organized crime conspiracy. A group of people either acting alone
or in concert with others committed crimes with a common purpose - a criminal
enterprise as described in "CRIMINAL
RICO: 18 USC. §§1961-1968 A Manual For Federal Prosecutors."
The players
acted together – in the usurpation of power, the abuse of power by public officials,
bribery, thefts by fraud including federal funds, money laundering, perjury and
the obstruction of justice, the violations of fundamental of civil rights,
aided and abetted in the commission of these crimes and or to conceal these
crimes. Criminals will lie and can't keep their lies straight. Their methods
and behaviors are the same, whether engaging in street crimes or elaborate
white-collar financial schemes. The only difference is when more money is
involved, the perps are more adept in concealing, covering up their sins, and
hiding where the money went. Many of these scandals are well known to the American Thinker readers.
I will focus my comments on Hillary's home brew sever and the Clinton
Foundation as an example of how RICO can be used to prosecute the players.
FBI
Director James Comey indicted Hillary Clinton for her home brew server at his
press conference. Comey then egregiously concluded that there was no evidence
of criminal intent purportedly “required” to prosecute. Comey bastardized
the Federal
Espionage Act in absolving Hillary
Clinton. FBI's investigation of Clinton's emails was low-balled. There was
never a real search for the truth. The outcome was preordained. My jaw dropped
wide open. I knew the fix was in. FBI Director Comey lied to the people with a
straight face. Why?
The chance
meeting of Bill Clinton and AG Loretta Lynch on the airport tarmac was no mere
coincidence. This chat was not about the grandkids. Bill Clinton was there to
convey a specific message to Lynch that there would be no indictment of
Hillary. Hillary Clinton's email case must tank. This would have constituted bribery, if AG Lynch was assured
she would continue as AG in Clinton Administration. This meeting took
place only weeks before Comey's press conference dumping Hillary Clinton's
email case.
The Deep
State needed Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 presidential election, or the dike
holding back the truth would burst. Trump, the disruptor, was an immediate
threat to both the Republicans, Democrats, and the Deep State. If the truth were laid bare, it would expose the Obama
Administration, Hillary Clinton, the Senate and House, and many executive
departments for these abuses of power, corruption, bribery, frauds, and thefts
of public funds.
High-level
government officials and the Deep State committed many serious felonies either
in furtherance of or to conceal the crimes committed in the pay to play scam. In exchange
for favorable consideration by Secretary Clinton, those who benefited
would donate to the Clinton Foundation. The FBI started and stopped
investigations into the Clinton Foundation at least twice as reported by
the Washington
Post. Peter Schweizer's book, Clinton
Cash, is the most damning. Dinesh D'Souza
slammed the Foundation in the National
Review, as did The
Federalist.
The
status of
the investigation of the Foundation by
US Attorney John Huber's is unknown. Rudy Giuliani said there was enough to
pursue "Clinton
Inc" as racketeering under RICO. The
Foundation and its affiliated nonprofits require a real investigation with an
in-depth forensic audit to determine where the money went. In financial crimes
investigation, the prime rule is "follow the money, honey." Illicit
nonprofits have many ways to divert funds by inflating salaries, expenses, and
money laundering.
Illegal
nonprofit schemes are difficult to prosecute without hard evidence and the testimony
of insiders. The motive of Hillary Clinton's use of the home brew server was to
conceal emails from FOIA requests that would provide the hard evidence. Hillary
Clinton destroyed the data on her server and cell phones with the knowledge of
the FBI. It took years for Judicial
Watch and others to pry and recover some
of these damning emails from the foot-dragging executive departments that were
complicit and knew what was going on.
RICO
initially was used to target mob families. RICO is also a useful tool to fight
white collar conspiracies. They both have the same hierarchy of low-level
crooks led by the top players, linked together with a common purpose. RICO has
tools to squeeze the low-level operatives to gather evidence to prosecute,
jail, and seize assets of the conspirators. The critical element required is
a pattern of criminal or racketeering activity. This pattern is proved by showing two predicate crimes were
committed within ten years. The list
of predicate crimes is extensive and
includes bribery, embezzlement, fraud, theft, money laundering, and obstruction
of justice. The typical five-year statute of limitations for most federal
felonies is extended to ten years from the last criminal act or acts committed
to conceal the conspiracy, i.e., lying under oath and similar actions to
obstruct justice. The prison sentences are steep. The effect is to cut off the
head of the organization and not just the low-level players.
The
criminal activity extends back to the ATF's Fast and Furious program through
the House impeachment show trial to cover up the illegal acts of the Obama
Administration, Hillary Clinton, the Department of State, the DOJ, the FBI, and
the CIA. A telltale sign that the DOJ under US Attorney General Barr is
willing to play hardball and may use RICO, came when he spoke to the Federalist Society: "Barr
accuses liberal 'resistance' of trying to 'sabotage' Trump." AG Barr said this, "shows
FBI launched Trump campaign investigation on the 'thinnest of suspicions." AG Barr is the new sheriff in town, he wears a badge, has
guns and will travel, can impanel grand juries, indict and arrest people, and
is not limited in his jurisdiction, like DOJ IG Horowitz.
The
collective actions of the Deep State are and were a silent coup to delegitimize
a Presidential candidate. Once elected to impede and resist the duly elected
President. The President's law enforcement and intel agencies were corrupted at
the highest level and went rogue.
Organized
crime can't exist without corrupt law enforcement. As I wrote in a letter to
President Trump earlier this year:
. . . I believe you understand the gravity of the situation and of
its importance to the very survival of our Country as we know it. If the people
involved are not held accountable for their actions, we will be no different
than some Third World Banana Republic.
Failure to act will destroy our founding principle of the Rule of
Law as stated by President John Adams, "We Are a Nation of Laws, Not of
Men" and we cannot allow a two-tiered justice system to prevail.
Ron Wright
is a retired detective from Riverside PD, CA. BA in political science CSUF, M.
Adm. University of Cal, Riverside. Facebook at Ron T. Cop.
No comments:
Post a Comment