“Why nepotism beneficiaries First Lady Michelle Obama and Vice President Joe Biden are Team Obama's biggest liberal hypocrites--bashing the corporate world and influence-peddling industries from which they and their relatives have benefited mightily. MICHELLE MALKIN
The moral decay of the US comes in part from the media
By Jack
Hellner
When President Obama was elected, he pledged
to remake America. It is a shame he did
so
much damage to the fabric of America in eight
short years.
The Obama/Biden was the most corrupt, criminal
administration any of us has
ever seen, yet the
media cheered or covered up
all the abuse of
power, obstruction of
Justice and other crimes.
Michelle Deserves Pity, but the
Rest of Us Deserve More
By Mark DeVine
The
equation "racial disparities = systemic racism" has achieved axiom
status in the science of social justice. Recently, Michelle Obama
upped the ante of racism's reach by lowering the bar for its detection even
farther. Her recent podcast interview detailing the many racist
blows and jabs she's absorbed and the pain inflicted thereby should evoke pity
for her — and also for all who must contend with the societal fallout
Michelle's particular brand of "suffering" portends.
Consider
the white racist attacks Michelle recounts. "Daily
slights. People talk over you." Buckle
up. There's more. "People will come up and pet my
dogs but will not look me in the eye." Then this: While waiting
in line for ice cream with her daughters, Michelle O. tells us, "a white
woman cut right in front of us." She reports that white
students assigned to room with her in college changed their dorm assignments
because they did not want to room with a black person.
With
eloquence and feeling, Michelle describes the devastating impact of the
"daily slights" received from white people — they "change the
shape of your soul." In the parlance of social justice ideology
and Critical Race Theory, the "soul change" Michelle undergoes is
called "inheriting the wound"
of America's systemic racism. Its effects are real in the sense that
they may be sincerely felt.
Michelle's
recounting of her experience of being a black woman in America is disturbing
and even moving. "When I'm just a black woman, white people
don't even see us. That is so telling of how white America views
people who are not like them. We don't exist. And when we
do exist, we exist as a threat. And that's
exhausting." Departing the White House for the last time, she
admits to Oprah, "when I got on the plane, I think I sobbed for like
thirty minutes."
Both
as FLOTUS and after settling into an 11-plus-million-dollar Martha's Vineyard
mansion, Michelle found neither final escape nor permanent relief from racism
and the pain it inflicts. How could she? She still
resides in permanently and systemically racist America. But she did
find strategies to help her cope. "It has been so important for
me to have black women in my crew, throughout my life, because there is such a
relief when you don't have to walk into your group and explain yourself."
Infantilization of a First Lady
Michelle
is a product of the "infantilization" of black Americans John McWhorter so
incisively warns of. The
upshot of McWhorter's contention is that a victimhood culture flourishes among
blacks that inhibits the maturity of blacks or people of any color who
internalize a debilitating "blame others" and "depend upon others"
ethos. "White people don't even see us!" What
power over herself Michelle cedes to whites. And what bitterness and
blame she harbors and feeds within her soul.
According
to McWhorter and other un-woke blacks, this infantilization was nurtured by the
post-MLK civil rights leadership in cahoots with a Democrat Party anxious to
win black votes by posing as their protectors and providers and by a nation of
whites desperate to dissociate from racism. Infantilization inhibits
the cultivation of that one adult psychic instinct Shelby Steele insists is
uniquely necessary to human flourishing in America — taking responsibility for
oneself.
Fueled
by Marxist Critical Race Theory, the rapid development of modern social justice
ideology since 2012 has expanded the scope and deepened the debilitating
consequences of post-MLK infantilization, giving rise to the concept of
micro-aggressions and the need for white-free safe spaces.
Experience + Sincerity =/= Truth
The
sincerity of Michelle's confessions of hurt over many years bears witness to
the tragic, soul-shaping power of the infantilization lamented by McWhorter and
Steele. Her pain also demonstrates that the reach of social justice
infantilization respects no socio-economic boundaries, penetrating and punishing
the heart and mind of one of the most beloved, wealthy, and powerful women on
the planet.
The
pity-evoking power of the former first lady's plight emerges not because the
slights and discourtesies identified warrant the level of suffering and
exhaustion experienced, but precisely because they do not. Michelle is a victim
indeed — but not so much of the racism, real or imagined, she
experiences. She suffers, rather, from the catastrophizing effect of
the heightened race-consciousness produced by infantilization. The
changed shape of Michelle's soul includes thin and ever thinning
outrage-triggering tripwires.
Much
of her suffering is unnecessary because its source resides far less in her
experiences than in the meanings the social justice movement has trained her
reflexively to draw from those experiences. The terror of the child
fresh from taking in a horror movie who truly believes that a monster lurks
under his bed is real even though the monster is not. Love pities
and comforts the child. But it does not validate child's unwarranted
fear; it debunks it.
Numerous
alternative, non-race-related interpretations of Michelle's reported averted
white eyes, the white queue-cutters, and even the white dorm room–changers are
readily available, but not to the infantilized Michelle. For her
non-racist readings are ruled out by social justice insistence that race
poisons every interracial encounter in America. For adults, even
where race plays a role in such encounters, the experience of micro-aggressions
does not trigger outrage or much of anything, because they are adults, not
children.
A National Pity Party
Pity
for Michelle? Absolutely. But pity a-plenty also for any
family, community, or nation increasingly populated by Michelle-like,
race-obsessed, infantilized sufferers.
Widespread
societal infantilization produces more like Michelle who seek shelter from the
racist storm and succor for their racist-inflicted wounds in little enclaves
inhabited by those similarly wounded who look and think like them.
Others,
however, seek release in collective tantrums bent on rock-throwing and
building-burning. They spit into the
black and brown faces of police, screaming, "You're a racist"; kick
in the skull of a white
man attempting to rescue a man from the mob; and assassinate a black American
life-long Democrat who decided he would vote
Trump come November. Michelle has no corner on pity these
days. Where infantilization takes hold, occasions for pity abound
indeed. But unlike Michelle and her husband, no island mansion
hideaway beckons to which the rest of us might repair.
Mark DeVine teaches at the Beeson Divinity
School in Birmingham, Alabama and is the author of Bonhoeffer Speaks
Today and Shalom Yesterday,
Today, and Forever.
THE
GREATEST TRANSFER OF WEALTH TO THE BANKSTER CLASS AND THE RICH PRIOR TO TRUMP
OCCURRED DURING THE OBAMA-BIDEN BANKSTER REGIME. THEY SERVED THE 1% WELL AND
THEY HAVE BEEN RICHLY REWARDED WITH FRAUDULENT DERIVED BOOK DEALS AND BANISTER
SPEECH FEE BRIBES.
But soon enough, the reality of Barack Obama’s unpopularity, the reality
of the criminal abuse by his administration in trying to frame and otherwise
take down President Trump, and the reality of a booming economy helping all Americans, would
take the air out of her balloon. Eric Georgatos
The
Obamas quickly became super rich. Vanity Fair celebrated these
"Obamoguls" and hailed Michelle Obama for her "saintly
popularity." This so-called saint doesn't spurn the finer things. Last
August, TMZ reported the Obamas were buying a $15 million mansion on the coast
of Martha's Vineyard to match their $8 million Washington, D.C., mansion.
TO BUILD
AN OBAMA MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP THIRD TERM, FIRST OBOMB WOULD HAVE TO FINISH
OFF THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS. HIS BANKSTERS HAVE DONE THAT. NEXT, SABOTAGE
AMERICAN BORDERS, VOTING AND JOBS FOR MEXICAN FLAG WAVERS. OBOMB, BIDEN AND HOLDER
HAVE ACHIEVED THAT WITH THE HELP OF GLOBALIST NANCY PELOSI.
“Why nepotism beneficiaries First Lady Michelle
Obama and Vice President Joe Biden are Team Obama's biggest liberal
hypocrites--bashing the corporate world and influence-peddling industries from
which they and their relatives have benefited mightily. MICHELLE MALKIN
The
cheers are always presumed to be unanimous. Dissent from this party line is
ignored. And no one asks about the profits. For the Obamas, greed is cast as
just another inspiring voyage of self-discovery.
Michelle
Obama, Saintly Buckraker?
The
Hollywood Reporter recently broke a scoop about the latest Netflix documentary
from the Obamas, designed to offer us an oasis of joy as we suffer through the
coronavirus pandemic. It's called "Becoming," and it will be
available worldwide on May 6. As the title suggests, it promotes Michelle
Obama's memoir of the same name, which has sold more than 10 million copies. So
let's get this straight. The Obamas were awarded a book deal worth an estimated
$65 million for their memoirs, hers and then his. They also struck an estimated
$50 million production deal with Netflix. (We don't have actual numbers. Could
someone in the media ask for a tax return?)
With this
self-aggrandizing documentary, their second deal is being used to accentuate
the profits of their first. The buckraking here is intense. President Donald
Trump surely admires their self-promotional moxie. The Obamas quickly became
super rich. Vanity Fair celebrated these "Obamoguls" and hailed
Michelle Obama for her "saintly popularity." This so-called saint
doesn't spurn the finer things. Last August, TMZ reported the Obamas were
buying a $15 million mansion on the coast of Martha's Vineyard to match their
$8 million Washington, D.C., mansion. Non-Fox network coverage? Zero. In
December, they actually bought said Martha's Vineyard mansion for $11.75
million. Non-Fox network coverage? Again, zero. There would be no denting
haloes by asking how much they're giving to charity. The documentary celebrates
Michelle Obama's "Becoming" book tour events at stadiums that charged
Obama superfans $300 or more a ticket, often with celebrities like Oprah
Winfrey along for the ride.
Media
outlets repeated Obama's self-puffery without rebuttal. "Those months I
spent traveling -- meeting and connecting with people in cities across the
globe -- drove home the idea that what we have in common is deep and real and
can't be messed with," she said in a statement. She augmented her new
status as a self-help guru with a workbook of sorts: "Becoming: A Guided
Journal for Discovering Your Voice," complete with "an intimate and
inspiring introduction by the former First Lady and more than 150 inspiring
questions and quotes to help you discover -- and rediscover -- your
story."
Not
everyone famous is praised for self-help books for women. The current
president's daughter Ivanka Trump wrote one in 2017, and The New York Times was
brutal. "It reads more like the scrambled Tumblr feed of a demented
12-year-old who just checked out a copy of Bartlett's Familiar Quotations from
the library," it wrote.
There are
never Republican critics of Obama in the "news" these days. In a
Washington Post story on the documentary, writer Sonia Rao quoted Anita
McBride, chief of staff to former first lady Laura Bush, who said Obama was
"a reluctant first lady" but then formed lasting public connections
through her "extraordinary use of media and pop culture and
television."
Is that
Michelle's gift to the media? No, it's the media's gift to Michelle. The
infatuated titans of "news" and entertainment media appear to have
granted her every "extraordinary" wish in building this
"billion-dollar brand."
The
cheers are always presumed to be unanimous. Dissent from this party line is
ignored. And no one asks about the profits. For the Obamas, greed is cast as
just another inspiring voyage of self-discovery.
Tim Graham is director of media
analysis a
Culture of Corruption: Obama and His
Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks, and
Cronies
by Michelle Malkin
Editorial Reviews
In her shocking new book, Malkin digs deep into
the records of President Obama's staff, revealing corrupt dealings,
questionable pasts, and abuses of power throughout his administration.
From the Inside Flap
The era of hope and change is dead....and it only
took six months in office to kill it.
Never has an administration taken office with
more inflated expectations of turning Washington around. Never have a
media-anointed American Idol and his entourage fallen so fast and hard. In her
latest investigative tour de force, New York Times bestselling author Michelle
Malkin delivers a powerful, damning, and comprehensive indictment of the
culture of corruption that surrounds Team Obama's brazen tax evaders, Wall
Street cronies, petty crooks, slum lords, and business-as-usual influence
peddlers. In Culture of Corruption, Malkin reveals:
* Why nepotism beneficiaries First Lady Michelle
Obama and Vice President Joe Biden are Team Obama's biggest liberal
hypocrites--bashing the corporate world and influence-peddling industries from
which they and their relatives have benefited mightily
* What secrets the ethics-deficient members of
Obama's cabinet--including Hillary Clinton--are trying to hide
* Why the Obama White House has more
power-hungry, unaccountable "czars" than any other administration
* How Team Obama's first one hundred days of
appointments became a litany of embarrassments as would-be appointee after
would-be appointee was exposed as a tax cheat or had to withdraw for other
reasons
* How Obama's old ACORN and union cronies have
squandered millions of taxpayer dollars and dues money to enrich themselves and
expand their power
* How Obama's Wall Street money men and corporate
lobbyists are ruining the economy and helping their friends In Culture of
Corruption, Michelle Malkin lays bare the Obama administration's seamy
underside that the liberal media would rather keep hidden.
•
ISBN-10: 1596981091
•
ISBN-13: 978-1596981096
Michelle Malkin
No Shady Banking Buddy Left Behind
First Lady Michelle Obama's latest overseas jaunt
is getting all the headlines. But President Obama's money-grubbing junket to
Chicago may cost taxpayers far more in the long run. With his Gaultier-clad
wife sashaying around the Spanish seaside, the lonely fundraiser-in-chief
returned to Illinois to take care of some birthday-week business. Job One:
Filling the Senate campaign coffers of his corruption-tainted political protege
Alexi Giannoulias.
Mission accomplished. Obama's Thursday afternoon
campaign event for Giannoulias, the beleaguered state treasurer of Illinois,
reportedly raked in $1 million. Lagging behind his GOP opponent, liberal
Republican Rep. Mark Kirk, Giannoulias has coveted one-on-one, grip-and-grin
time with Obama for months. In addition to the cash, photo-ops and video of the
Obama fundraising event that Giannoulias will milk from now until Election Day,
the White House has dispatched Vice President Joe Biden, White House senior
adviser David Axelrod and White House campaign management guru David Plouffe to
boost Giannoulias' bid. Plouffe proclaimed Democrats "all in" for
Giannoulias, whom he described as "a great progressive champion."
Obama gave his own personal seal of ethical
approval,
telling deep-pocketed donors this week: "I
appreciate his
strong sense of advocacy for ordinary Americans.
You
can trust him -- you can count on him."
Uh-huh. And I've
got a bridge to Hope and Change to sell you.
What would Giannoulias know about "ordinary
Americans"? Giannoulias, 34, befriended Obama during pickup basketball
games with an elite group that also included Michelle Obama's brother, Craig;
Chicago edu-crat Arne Duncan (now Education Secretary); and hedge fund manager
John Rogers (the ex-husband of the Obamas' ex-White House social secretary,
Desiree Rogers). He spread his wealth and influence around early and often to
support Obama's fledgling political career. He pitched in $7,000 in 2003-2004
to Obama's Illinois State Senate bids. He hosted fundraisers for Obama's U.S.
Senate campaign in 2004 and for his presidential campaign in 2007.
Where'd the cash come from? Giannoulias' Greek
immigrant family founded Chicago-based Broadway Bank, a now-defunct financial
institution that loaned tens of millions of dollars to convicted mafia felons
and faced bankruptcy after decades of engaging in risky, high-flying behavior.
It's the place where Obama parked his 2004 U.S. Senate campaign funds. And
it's the same place where a mutual friend of Obama and Giannoulias -- convicted
Obama fundraiser/slum lord Tony Rezko -- used to bounce nearly $500,000 in bad
checks written to Las Vegas casinos. This week, the Chicago Sun-Times
revealed an additional $22.75 million Broadway Bank loan to a Rezko-owned
business in 2006. Giannoulias held an ownership stake in the bank at the time.
Giannoulias served as Broadway Bank vice
president and senior loan officer for four years. According to the Chicago
Tribune, during Giannoulias' tenure, some $27 million of Broadway Bank's funny
money went to mob crooks Michael "Jaws" Giorango and Demitri
Stavropoulos. Giorango is a hustler who fronted a nationwide prostitution ring
and was sentenced to six months in prison; Stavropoulos is behind bars for
operating a multistate bookmaking ring. Giorango ran the $400-an-hour call girl
operation out of high-rise luxury apartments in Chicago with the infamous
"Gold Coast Madam," Rose Laws. Giorango and Stavropoulos used their
Broadway Bank loans to start their own risky lending business for nontraditional
borrowers unable to secure traditional bank financing.
Despite Giorango's criminal record exposed by the
Tribune in 2004, Broadway Bank approved massive mortgages for him. Giannoulias'
brother, Demetris, explained that as a "relationship bank," Broadway
wouldn't just throw someone under the bus because of a "bad article."
Instead, the bank went ahead and rubber-stamped a September 2005 loan for $3.4
million to buy a 32-unit Los Angeles apartment complex. The application falsely
stated that the borrower, Giorango, had "not been convicted of a
felony." Giannoulias oversaw the servicing of such shady loans totaling
$11 million. Remember: He was no low-level staffer. He was, as he reminded
supporters when he needed to deflect attention away from his youth, top
management at Broadway Bank.
In January 2010, the bank entered a consent
decree with federal and Illinois state regulators. It required Broadway Bank
"to raise tens of millions in capital, stop paying dividends to the family
without regulatory approval, and hire an outside party to evaluate the bank's
senior management." The city's former inspector general blasted
Giannoulias and his family for tapping $70 million worth of dividends in 2007
and 2008 as the real estate crash loomed. Broadway Bank was sitting on an estimated
$250 million in bad loans. In late April, federal regulators shut it down. Cost
to taxpayers: an estimated $390 million. Giannoulias refused to drop out of the
race -- and instead used the company failure to argue that it made him (SET
ITAL) more (END ITAL) qualified to serve in office: "I have a renewed
vigor and a new perspective on just how horrible it is out there for so many
people."
Forget
‘Michelle for President’
Our
betters in the MSM, and related ruling-class mouthpieces, have set the
narrative: the lackluster, too-crazy pack of Democrat presidential
candidates, even with a few token billionaires, will ultimately give way to the
entry of Michelle Obama into the race. The former First Lady, author of
an apparently best-selling memoir, will inject palpable blue energy throughout
the nation, return black America to a 95+% Democrat voting bloc, consolidate
the Obama voting coalitions that won two presidential elections, and the evil
interloper Trump will be sent packing.
Don’t
buy this narrative.
In
a country of 320+ million people, there is always a sizable segment who will
not be willing or able to discern or question anything beyond what they are
told by the MSM, and will follow the narrative. That segment is actually
becoming smaller every year; the reality of fake news has diluted the MSM’s
influence to a far greater degree than they understand. But that’s not
why I’m not buying the narrative.
Here’s
why:
‘Obama’ is how we got Trump. For all the
gigabytes devoted to explaining how Donald Trump was elected President of the
United States, the simplest two-word explanation has always been: Barack
Obama.
Most
Americans never agreed with the radical left-wing policies that President Obama
instituted, nor did they appreciate his subtle, persistent denigration of
America’s character, identity and place in the world. But Americans did salute
to the notion that we should be especially careful not to criticize America’s
first black President.
In
short, the absence of strong criticism of President Obama and his policies was
not due to their popularity, but rather due to a surrender to the political
reality enforced in great degree by the MSM that any such criticism would be
labeled as racist. His policies and view of America were in fact alarming
to many Americans, who silently bided their time until he was out of office.
The
truth is that Barack Obama was and is a radical leftist ideologue who in his
own words sought to fundamentally transform America. A few
observers saw this agenda from the beginning of Obama’s appearance on the
national scene, but they were voices in a wilderness dominated by a sycophantic
media. The American people never supported a fundamental transformation
of their country -- in leftist terms, a shredding of America’s Judeo-Christian
heritage in favor of a godless, George Soros-vision of an Open Society,
directed and controlled by almighty secular government -- and the more they
understood the truth of who Obama was and what he was trying to do, the angrier and more resentful they
became.
Donald
Trump was the anti-Obama for one simple reason: he loves America.
And
so…the “Michelle Obama riding on the residual goodwill of the Obama name!”
campaign narrative, doesn’t resonate.
Three-plus
years later, with black unemployment the lowest in recorded history, polls that
show roughly a third of likely voting black Americans supporting President
Trump are not an accident or a fluke. (And they may just mark the floor of his support in
2020.) They reflect conscious recognition among black Americans of simple
truths: black lives generally did not get better under eight years of Obama;
black lives generally have gotten much better under less than three years of
President Trump.
And
so…the “Michelle Obama will bring back the good old days of black prosperity!”
campaign narrative falls flat.
Barack Obama is the elephant in the room re Barr/Durham. Of all the names that
engaged Americans associate with the Russia Collusion hoax -- Brennan, Clapper,
Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Ohr, Rosenstein, Simpson, Steele, etc. --
there is one that is going to loom larger and larger in public thought as the
Horowitz IG report and Barr/Durham followup becomes public: Barack
Obama.
Our
own guess is that when the truth finally comes out, Americans across the
political spectrum will be stunned at the level of criminality and corruption in
the Obama administration. It will shock the collective conscience
of the nation that all of this was directed to brazenly and arrogantly
overturning the will of the American people for the ugly but simple reason that
Donald Trump was an outsider who threatened the Obama/leftist/globalist hold on
power.
If
the Horowitz report and Barr/Durham follow-up reveals, as seems increasingly
likely, the deliberate and nefarious concoction of the Russia Collusion Hoax by
leaders in the CIA, FBI, and DoJ, the vast majority of Americans, including
millions who have historically identified themselves politically as Democrats,
will be fiercely offended at this historic, unconscionable abuse. And who
is at the top of all the plotting and scheming and lying and weaponization of
government against the will of the people? Barack Obama.
And
so…the ”Michelle Obama will bring back the days of the scandal-free Obama
administration!” campaign narrative reeks.
Michelle’s heart isn’t in it… and may not be a happy heart anyway. Mrs. Obama is on record
saying she has no interest in running, and of course, those words by themselves
mean nothing as to whether she will enter the race. But we think they do
signal that at her core, her heart is not in it. And ‘it’ refers to the
pressure, the nastiness, the unrelenting spotlight, the
every-word-and-every-smirk-on-video scrutiny of an American presidential race.
Michelle
Obama’s eight years in a soft, adulatory spotlight as First Lady are not the
same as the brass tacks rough-and-tumble of a presidential campaign. And
even if the MSM did everything in its power to shield her (and it surely
would), the MSM is not the gatekeeper it once was. Plus, winners
tend to be happy warriors. There has always seemed to be an undercurrent
of anger in Michelle Obama’s countenance, and if it ever flared on the campaign
trail, she could quickly find herself in a big hole. Anger doesn’t win
elections.
Michelle
Obama may or may not get into the race; it’s probably a 50/50 proposition at
this point. And if she does get in, she’ll have access to the best
messaging talent the left can buy. So she’d make waves for a
while. But soon enough, the reality of Barack Obama’s unpopularity, the reality
of the criminal abuse by his administration in trying to frame and otherwise
take down President Trump, and the reality of a booming economy helping all Americans, would
take the air out of her balloon. “Bring Back Barack” is not a winning campaign
theme. And if a tweet or two happened to get under her skin, the result
could be ugly.
“Michelle
Obama for President” is not inevitable or invincible.
Eric Georgatos is a former corporate lawyer who operated the
Brushfires of Freedom blog from 2008-2016 (a book of top postings from the blog
is available at America, Can We Talk?).
The moral decay of the US comes in part from the media
When President Obama was elected, he pledged
to remake America. It is a shame he did so
much damage to the fabric of America in eight
short years. Here is a sample of recent events that show how far morality has declined in the U.S.:
The Netflix movie Cuties sexualizes very young girls. Somehow that abuse of children didn't make the nightly news.
Maybe the Obamas and Prince Harry and Meghan should be asked what they think of Netflix since they make so much money from them, despite having no experience producing films.
'Cancel Netflix' backlash grows over 'Cuties' film's sexualization of young girls
But this wasn't the half of it. How about this?
New California bill would lower penalties for adults who have sexual relations with a minor
A new bill headed to Governor Gavin Newsom's desk would lower penalties for adults who have consensual sex with a minor if the offender is within 10 years of age with the victim.
"If signed into law, a 24-year-old could have sexual relations with a 15-year-old child without being required to register as a sex offender[.]"
While California politicians are focused like a laser beam on keeping people from gathering at businesses, going to church, wearing masks, or gathering on beaches, now's the time they decide to lessen the penalties on pedophiles who abuse and groom children? Somehow, children who can't legally do much have the ability to consent to sex with adults. Isn't it nice that these children are disposable? It is no wonder most of the media buried the Epstein story for years to protect the Clintons. The abused young girls were disposable.
The media, entertainers, athletes, and other Democrats will boycott states that limit abortion or have people use facilities that match their desired body parts, but they won't boycott Iran, Cuba, or China. Can anyone spot the hypocrisy?
We see lots of pro athletes and entertainers who will gladly trash the U.S. and disrespect the flag and national anthem, but never do we see them criticize China, which abuses so many. The greed overcomes their morality. Like this:
Disney criticized for filming 'Mulan' in China's Xinjiang
Disney is under fire for filming part of its live-action reboot "Mulan" in Xinjiang, the region in China where the government has been accused of human rights abuses against Uighurs and other predominantly Muslim minorities.
It was immoral and deadly for Gov. Andrew Cuomo of New York and other governors to force nursing homes to take in sick people to kill vulnerable residents but the media cheers Cuomo and lies when they blame Trump for the deaths.
It is immoral for politicians to keep so many businesses and schools closed long after the curve has been flattened and then blame Trump for the job losses and their intentional destruction of the economy. The mental, physical, and financial health of tens of millions are intentionally being destroyed because of the coming election.
It is immoral for supposed journalists, mayors, and governors to watch radical leftists, Marxists, and anarchists harm people and destroy businesses and cities while claiming they are mostly peaceful protests. Then, when it is clear that the violent protests are harming Biden, they lie and proclaim that Trump is causing the violence.
It is immoral that government officials are waiting until after the election to open the schools, but that is what an L.A. County health official admitted. That shows how little they care about the children and how much they care about power. Shouldn't it make the nightly news when health officials are basing their decisions on an election date instead of science?
Audio: LA County Health Director Says Schools Won't Reopen Until After November Election
The Obama/Biden was the most corrupt, criminal
administration any of us has ever seen, yet the
media cheered or covered up all the abuse of
power, obstruction of Justice and other crimes.
The media and other Democrats spend a lot of time rewriting history to intentionally mislead the public, but the truth should matter.
I realize that this is repetitious, but Trump and his supporters are attacked every day, and we must stay on offense or America will be permanently destroyed:
Obama and his minions continually lied to the American people to take away choices on health care.
Obama used the IRS to target political opponents. (Isn't this a violation of the Hatch Act?)
Obama illegally spied on thousands of Americans, including some journalists.
The Obama administration shook down corporations at Justice, the EPA, and the CFPB and established slush funds which were used for political purposes and to give kickbacks to political supporters. (Aren't these clear violations of the Hatch Act?)
The Obama administration continually lied through the media to get the deal done with Iran which pledges death to America and death to Israel. Massive amounts of money were given to the Iranians, which allowed them to sponsor terrorism.
Obama dictatorially stopped a long investigation into a billion-dollar a year drug-running investigation into Hezbollah to appease Iran.
On 9-11-12, Obama and Hillary didn't lift a finger to save Americans under attack in Benghazi. Instead they concocted a lie about a video to protect their political power.
Obama/Biden blocked vouchers for poor kids to have school choice.
Obama dictatorially and unconstitutionally implemented DACA. Instead of the media and other Democrats caring about this clear abuse of power, they cheered.
Obama dictatorially allowed boys and men to go to womens' restrooms and threatened to cut off funds if schools didn't comply.
The Democrats went from saying they believed in limited abortion to unlimited abortion and even allowing children to die after birth without health care.
Obama/Biden refused to give Ukraine defensive weapons to appease Vladimir Putin.
No one cared about all the women Bill and Hillary physically and mentally abused and sought to destroy as they craved political power. The women were disposable.
The Obama/Biden saved their most criminal, corrupt acts until 2016 when they used massive amounts of government personnel and money (isn't this a violation of the Hatch Act?) as they sought to destroy Trump and elect the criminal Hillary as President. Woodward, Bernstein and other supposed journalists not only didn't care about the crimes, they have participated in perpetuating the lie of Russian collusion to the public for years and supported endless investigations by the lying Schiff and Nadler.
But according to Woodward, Bernstein and most of the media, it is Trump who is unfit to be president and Trump's supporters are immoral, along with every other name they can think of.
Never Trumpers, most of the media and other Democrats say we need to elect Biden to get back to normalcy and for unity. What pure B.S. There was nothing normal about the Obama/Biden years. They were corrupt and set out to destroy the private sector and make the government more powerful. They continually abused their power and sought to destroy political opponents. Exactly which of the socialist policies would the Republicans feel unified with? Why would Republicans ever unify with helping the tyrants in Iran or destroying the U.S. economy with some version of the green new deal?
No comments:
Post a Comment