Hillary Clinton Congratulates Kamala Harris for ‘Masterful Debate Performance’
Hillary Clinton, President Donald Trump’s former challenger, congratulated Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) for what she described as a “masterful” performance at Wednesday evening’s vice presidential debate, adding that the vice presidential hopeful “swatted away the lies with ease.”
“Congratulations to @kamalaharris for a masterful debate performance,” Clinton said on Thursday.
“She swatted away the lies with ease,” she continued, a likely play on words referencing the fly that distracted many during a portion of the debate.
Clinton then urged Americans to “join this winning team.” She did not divulge which “lies” she believes Harris beat back:
Congratulations to @kamalaharris for a masterful debate performance.
She swatted away the lies with ease.
Join this winning team. https://t.co/mxkpLIOEux pic.twitter.com/Lb1KdeudQZ
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) October 8, 2020
The failed Trump challenger spoke to Harris days before the debate, warning her that Pence would likely try to “diminish” her “as a woman.”
“And I think you should also be prepared for, you know, the slights, the efforts to diminish you, you personally, you as a woman who’s about to be our next vice president,” Clinton said during a bonus episode of the podcast You and Me Both with Hillary Clinton.
“So I do think that there will be a lot of maneuvering on the other side to try to put you in a box,” she added.
Indeed, many leftists accused Pence of “mansplaining” throughout the debate, despite the fact that both candidates had roughly the same speaking time.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) also appealed to Harris’s status as a woman, claiming that it was “gross” to see “Pence demanding that Harris answer *his* own personal questions when he won’t even answer the moderator’s.”
It was “exemplary of the gender dynamics so many women have to deal with at work,” she added:
Pence demanding that Harris answer *his* own personal questions when he won’t even answer the moderator’s is gross, and exemplary of the gender dynamics so many women have to deal with at work.
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) October 8, 2020
While Harris received sterling accolades from several political pundits following the debate, a report from the Federalist revealed that only 2 out of 26 post-debate analysts on broadcast and cable were Trump supporters.
Bated
Breath for Barr's Big Break
By Erik Gregory and Todd Gregory
With
the reported guilty plea of Federal Bureau
of Investigation (FBI) lawyer Kevin Clinesmith to a false statement charge as
part of John Durham's Russia Hoax investigation, true conservatives are
celebrating the much heralded arrival of Attorney General (A.G.) William (Bill)
Barr, who, we are being promised, will round up the coup-plotters with dispatch
and bring a rain ruin to the anti-Trump cabal that engaged in the illegal
spying and sting operations against the president and his associates.
And
yet...and yet..Kevin Clinesmith? Not exactly a ringleader in the
anti-Trump cabal. And what of the instigators of this audacious plot
against the president (i.e., John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey, Joe
Biden, or Barack Obama to name but a few)? Thus far, Barr has
indicated no intention of prosecuting anyone beyond the low-hanging fruit of
Kevin Clinesmith and even publicly issued assurances to Barack Obama and Joe Biden that they have no
criminal culpability (to say nothing of Barr's exoneration of Andrew McCabe on
Valentine's Day). Former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) chief
John Brennan was reportedly told by Durham that he was not a target (or even a subject) of
the Russia Hoax investigation. And it appears that Durham has not
even interviewed most of the principal figures central to the Russia
Hoax. While Barr and Durham should be applauded for finally taking
some judicial action, however limited, if Kevin "little fish" Clinesmith
is their biggest catch and the true ringleaders escape unscathed, we can be
assured these serial abuses of power will escalate under a Joe en
administration.
Consequence #1 — The DOJ Will Ensure a Two-Tiered Politicized
Justice System (Exclusively Targeting Conservatives and Protecting
Progressives): The DOJ began visibly putting its thumb on the scales of justice
in favor of fellow progressives and against conservatives during Obama's
reign. Examples are extensive, but to recap a few highlights, recall
the persecution of conservatives by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the
Sharyl Attkisson/James Rosen spy scandals and the shameless protection of
Hillary Clinton, who (along with several members of her staff) committed
multiple and flagrant felonies including lying to Congress and felony
dissemination of material classified at the highest security
levels. Out of these scandals, and more, how many progressive
Democrats were indicted and prosecuted? None. Under
Obama, the progressive DOJ was the quintessential "hometown referee"
for the Democrats. They blew the whistle on everything Republican
(including false allegations, like the Russia Hoax) and looked the other way,
every time, when Democrats committed real crimes (just ask Hillary Clinton
or Barack Obama). By some estimates, 97% of DOJ political donations went
to the Democratic Party. Republicans and conservatives, and soon even
moderates, are, or will shortly be, subject to a nearly impossible standard of
justice. With Biden's 2020 victory, the progressive Democrats will
cement their stranglehold on the DOJ, and the political persecution and
censorship of all future generations of Republicans (and, indeed, moderates) is
assured.
Consequence #2 — Escalating Federal Government Attacks against
Republicans and Conservatives: Progressive-dominated federal government
agencies will renew and escalate attacks against conservative organizations and
individuals in the confident knowledge that the politically aligned DOJ will
not hold them to account. The IRS (dominated by left-wing ideologues), among other
like-minded agencies (such as the CIA), under a Biden presidency, will be
emboldened to renew their attacks on Republicans and conservatives with
impunity (just as they did during the Obama years).
Consequence #3 — The Russia Hoax Investigation Will Be Dissolved
Immediately by President Biden.
BLOG EDITOR: HILLARY CLINTON SALTED INTO HER PHONY CLINTON
FOUNDATION FAMILY SLUSH FUND $165
MILLION IN DIRTY RUSSIAN BRIBES FOR SERVICES PROVIDED.
Consequence #4 — The DOJ Will Disenfranchise United States
Citizens by Enforcing Open Borders: Under Biden, the DOJ (and
the John Roberts–led Supreme Court) will use the awesome power of the law to
enforce open borders and grant amnesty to millions of illegal migrants, which
will ensure many millions of new voters for the progressive Democrats (to say
nothing of breaking the social welfare state at U.S. taxpayer
expense). This will result in the widespread disenfranchisement of
United States citizens, whose votes will be essentially
nullified. The DOJ and Supreme Court will be all too happy to ensure
Democratic hegemony for the foreseeable future, but along with the new voters
will come criminals, gangs, smuggling, disease, and an endless supply of
illegal drugs (effectively making the United States an open toilet for the rest
of the world). The rich and happy public "self"-servants
of the DOJ and Supreme Court will not suffer the consequences of their
disastrous policies from behind their gated and secure
communities. We will.
Consequence #5 — A One-Party United States: Owing to Consequence
#4, we will live in a one-party (Democrat) country. Diversity of
thought and policy will no longer be tolerated. Those that stray
from progressive orthodoxy will be targeted for destruction by the awesome and
unchecked powers of the DOJ.
Consequence #6 — Persecution of Christians (and Rigorous
Protection of Non-Christian Faiths): If you burn a Koran, the DOJ will arrest you
and charge you with a hate crime. If you burn a Bible, you won't
be. It's that simple, and it helps explain why the DOJ has taken no
steps to protect churches even while they are being actively targeted for
desecration during the riots. If mosques were being burned down, be
assured that the DOJ would arrive in force with guns drawn. If
churches are being burned down, the DOJ is cool with that.
Consequence #7 — Election Interference and Election Rigging Will
Be Assured in a Manner Favoring Progressive Democrats: Mail-in voting,
already so rife with fraud, along with so-called ballot-harvesting, will be
enthusiastically supported (and enforced) by the progressive-friendly
DOJ. Progressive judges called to adjudicate these matters will invariably
side with their political allies over the rule of law. It's an open
joke that Republican voters who die often keep right on voting — as Democrats.
Conclusion: This is a pivotal moment for the A.G.'s office,
and Bill Barr needs to consider the legacy that he will be leaving future
generations. The seven consequences listed merely scratch the
surface in terms of how a progressive Democrat administration will wield the
awesome powers of the DOJ as a transformative agent to terrorize and extinguish
(conservative) political opponents and ensure permanent progressive Democrat
hegemony. Conservatives like Bill Barr, among many others, still
naïvely believe in the equal and transparent application of the rule of law, a
belief that is in no way reciprocated by their progressive Democrat colleagues
at the DOJ. To the progressive Democrat, using the awesome power of
the law to target morally inferior conservatives is a solemn obligation and
duty. Expecting a progressive Democrat to adhere to the law and
engage in fair play is a fool's errand, a fallacy, wishful thinking, hopes and
prayers. We are dealing not with reasonable liberals from several decades
ago, but instead with power-crazed progressives who believe they have a mission
and mandate to destroy the political opposition.
If
Barr hoists the white flag in abject abeyance to the Deep State (as Jeff
Sessions did), then the dirty cops will have won. Conservatives like
Bill Barr will then deserve what's coming to them, but our children and
grandchildren don't, and they will be the ones who pay the
price. They will live forever in a political prison, under the boot
of the progressive Democrat DOJ, which stands ready to strike against
law-abiding conservatives — for being conservative, or being Caucasian, or
attending a Christian church, or whatever pretext the progressive left can
think of — while simultaneously protecting progressive Democrats who abuse
conservatives. Our grandchildren will curse our memory for the
government and nation we bequeath to them and the vulnerable, weakened position
in which we have left them.
It
has been said that fortune favors the bold, and the progressive Democrats at
the DOJ, and other federal agencies, have been oh, so bold in recent years,
wielding their awesome powers of terror against the political
opposition. If Barr's "answer" to this vast progressive
offensive is Kevin Clinesmith, then the progressive Democrats will have won the
final victory. Conservatives had better begin thinking in terms of
bending knee and tending sheep in servitude to the victorious progressive
Democrats.
The
Clinton Foundation’s record of exploiting natural disasters to source funds for
which they never account is as long as it is shameless.
As awful as this
orchestrated campaign against President Trump has been, it is absolutely
maddening to realize that none of it would have happened had Hillary Clinton
not engaged in one of the greatest pay-for-play operations in American history
while placing our most guarded secrets (as well as the very lives of our
soldiers and civilians) on a silver platter for those governments and
adversaries who wish us the most harm in this world. Three years of
Russian hysteria happened only because of the deep corruption of Hillary
Clinton. J B SHURK
Clinton Foundation Put On Watch List Of Suspicious ‘Charities’
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/04/charity-navigator-clinton-foundation.html
"But what the Clintons do is criminal
because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel
thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their
friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs
beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by
now." ---- Patricia McCarthy
HILLARY &
BILLARY: The Evita and Juan Peron of Wall Street
The Clinton Looting of the Poor of Haiti
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/10/the-clinton-mafia-loots-poor-of-haiti.html
“The couple parlayed lives
supposedly spent in “public service”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in
the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes. The basic
components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall Street and
Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and donations to the
ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”
IT WAS BILL
CLINTON WHO UNLEASHED WALL STREET’S BIGGEST CRIMINAL BANKSTERS…. And haven’t
they sucked up the banksters’ gratuities since?
Only Barack
Obama has serviced banksters more than Hillary and Billary!
“Clinton also failed to mention how he and Hillary
cashed in after his presidential tenure to
make themselves multimillionaires, in part by taking tens of
millions in speaking fees from Wall Street bankers.”
FROM DAY ONE THE CLINTONS HAVE BEEN A CRIME TIDAL WAVE!
Anatomy of a Clinton Scam
“The
bigger the lie, the more likely the buy-in” -- that must be the theory
underlying a plan relentlessly executed by Bill and Hillary Clinton to suck
money from the public in support of a supposed “charity” currently known as
“Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation.”
Unlike
the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation that was originally funded primarily by
the Gates family, the Clinton Foundation was meant to take money from the
general public, and from governments.
So,
affairs of the Clinton Foundation were never supposed to be directed by the
Clinton family. But public records apparently prove that strict rules governing
the conduct of public charities are not applied when it comes to long-time
“public servants” such as the Clintons.
Incorporated
but not Organized
However,
to qualify for federal tax-exemption, a charity must be formally organized not
simply by lawyers but by, at least three truly independent directors, who
needed to adopt articles of incorporation and bylaws in a formal organizational
meeting before the entity conducted official operations. Bylaws for this entity
may not have been formally adopted by initial directors (referred to as
“Trustees”) until Dec. 23, 1997 as you can see for yourself by reviewing these
materials available through the main Clinton Foundation website.
A
reasonable question to ask is: what did “The William J. Clinton Presidential
Foundation” do, if anything, prior to adopting bylaws, and how did they
accomplish these actions before becoming formally ''organized ``?
“Formless
aggregations of individuals” are not “organizations”
Well
before Dec. 23, 1997, Clinton allies laid groundwork required to erect the Clinton
Foundation in a portion of Little Rock that had long been run-down, depressing
local property values.
However,
the IRS explains that only
“organizations” are eligible for exemption from taxes, not “formless
aggregations of individuals”:
“An individual, partnership, or formless
aggregation of individuals, however, cannot qualify for exemption under IRC
501(c)(3). If it is determined that no organization exists, the applicant will
be advised that no ruling or determination letter can be issued [emphasis
added].”
Newspaper
accounts, court records and other publicly available information show that
early efforts on behalf of the “Clinton Foundation” were not conducted in
corporate form, but instead loosely and informally, chiefly by Clinton
political supporters.
For
example, on Nov. 7, 1997, City of Little Rock public meeting notes state:
“[Little Rock] Mayor Dailey said he received word
from Skip Rutherford, local coordinator for the Presidential Library at 7:00
AM, that President and Mrs. Clinton has selected the site along the Arkansas
River in Little Rock as the location for the proposed William Jefferson Clinton
Presidential Library [emphasis added].”
In
this C-SPAN clip, Rutherford is clearly seen explaining widespread activities
carried out through Nov. 7, 1997:
In
1997, and for years afterward, Bill and Hillary Clinton were not lawfully
designated directors, trustees, officers, or agents of the purported legal
entity that was supposed to operate the presidential library and research
center only in Little Rock.
How
did Bill and Hillary Clinton have lawful authority to pick the site for Bill’s
presidential library?
Moreover,
did The William J. Clinton Presidential Foundation even exist as a lawfully
organized corporate entity in 1997?
Admissions
Against Interest
Under
siege late in 1997, in 1998, and then safely through the Impeachment trial by
early 1999, the Clinton team must have been sure that loyal elements within the
Arkansas Attorney General’s office, the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S.
Attorney General’s office would never prosecute those responsible for operating
the Clinton Foundation illegally so long as the Clintons remained resident
inside the White House.
Though
required to do so, the Clinton Foundation never filed an informational return
(on Form 990, or 990EZ) for the “short period” from Oct. 23, 1997 through Dec.
31, 1997. This is important because, somehow, the Clinton Foundation acquired
financial resources sufficient to pay lawyers and fund operations starting late
in October. And a key unanswered question remains: “who advanced them the
money?”
In
a report to Michigan government authorities, filed in July 1998, Rutherford
explained why the Clinton Foundation did not file an IRS Form 990 or 990EZ for
1997 because:
“The organization [was] not in existence last
fiscal year--[Not Applicable] [emphasis added].”
In
the second informational return the Clinton Foundation ultimately did file with
the IRS for 1999, on Nov. 20, 2000, an officer of the entity admitted, under penalties of
perjury:
“The Foundation began operations in 1998
[emphasis added] and is in the early stages of raising funds to meet the exempt
purposes. Program development is in the very early planning stage and no
significant program service expenses have been incurred.”
So,
The William J. Clinton Presidential Foundation did not exist in 1997, even as
elements within the IRS rushed to grant federal tax-exemption to the entity
back to Oct. 23, 1997 as this “Determination Letter,” found on the Clinton
Foundation website clearly states.
Times
were certainly different from 1997 through 2000, but we remember when the IRS
rigorously and ruthlessly enforced key charity laws
and regulations under President Obama.
Are
former Presidents above the law?
Stillborn
in 1997, the Clinton Foundation has managed to grow into a network of entities,
none of which has ever lawfully been organized or operated. This allegation is
now supported by some 200 podcasts, averaging two hours in
length each, most of which are accompanied by pull-down slide presentations
that readily take viewers and should take investigators into details of what
seems to be the largest set of unprosecuted charity frauds in history:
Bob
Mueller, James Comey and Rod Rosenstein may have “missed” the early development
of this scam, from 2001 through 2005 when the FBI and DOJ “investigated” the Clinton
Foundation as these redacted records reveal.
And,
on the 10th anniversary of devastating disasters that flattened portions of
Haiti, Hillary Clinton actually crowed about US Attorney John Huber’s
unconfirmed decision to wind down the latest “investigation” of potential
Clinton Foundation crimes:
The
Clinton Foundation’s record of exploiting natural disasters to source funds for
which they never account is as long as it is shameless.
Americans
across the political spectrum must push our government authorities to hold
operators of the Clinton charity scam network to account.
“Bleachbit”
notwithstanding, overwhelming evidence of unprosecuted charity frauds dating to
Oct. 23, 1997 hides in plain sight
Check
applicable laws, then check facts for yourselves and remember these words from
John Adams:
“Facts are stubborn things [emphasis added];
and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our
passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
During
the 2016 election cycle, the mainstream media failed to probe the heart of
the more recent Clinton Foundation
scandal --
how the Clinton family may have exploited Hillary’s position as Secretary of
State and her standing as presidential frontrunner through November 2016.
Building
fortunes through operating charities is a monstrous affront to decent,
law-abiding people of all political persuasions, so it is not a partisan thing,
here, to attack the Clintons for their known public record of transgressions.
In
fact, a better question might be to wonder why Democrats, including Bernie
Sanders, are not much more insistent that ongoing Clinton charity scams be
fully exposed, and aggressively prosecuted by state, federal and
foreign governments.
Our
Russia Collusion Nightmare: All Hillary's Fault?
By J.B. Shurk
The
biggest political scandal in the history of the United States. Three
years of constant lies told by government agents, political operatives, and
deceitful news personalities. Thousands of hours of criminal
investigative interviews; thousands of written stories and television segments;
thousands of leaks and insinuations and threats. All to take down
the legitimately elected American president, Donald J. Trump.
Now
that some light is finally revealing just how rotten this whole nonsense has
been from the very beginning, the most maddening aspect of all is the one thing
not said nearly enough: every bit of this frame-up job to hang the American
president for being a Russian agent and traitor to his nation began as a way to
inoculate Hillary Clinton from her largest political vulnerabilities going into
the 2016 campaign.
Aside
from her questionable health and a lifetime of scandal, Hillary had two sizable
liabilities (of her own creation) that threatened her ability to win the
general election: (1) her use of the Clinton Foundation as a vehicle for
laundering bribes from foreign governments and moneyed interests and (2) her
decision to conduct the business of the State Department (as well as to discuss
our nation's most guarded secrets) on an unsecured private email server that
had been hacked by known and unknown foreign governments and adverse
entities. Peter Schweizer's Clinton Cash did a remarkable job exposing the Clinton
Foundation as a spectacular pay-to-play operation that had allowed Hillary to
trade the powers of her office for personal aggrandizement (including the sale
of 20% of America's uranium to Russia for, among other things, $145 million
transferred to her foundation). And even though the Obama Justice
Department was doing its best to minimize the revelation of Hillary's gross
breach of national security and slow-walk any repercussions, the American
people were discovering that life-and-death secrets had been entrusted to a
person with such disregard for our well-being that she stored them on a
personal server in a downstairs bathroom.
For
a normal person with a modicum of ethical concern, sense of shame, or patriotic
duty, these crimes would have been more than sufficient to prompt withdrawal
from an election for the country's highest office. This type of
honest self-reflection and private admission of guilt is alien to the Clintons,
though, so what would have represented immovable obstacles to anyone else
became just another set of political variables that had to be neutralized in
her favor.
I
can just imagine the conversation Hillary had with her most trusted advisers —
not the ones with the official titles like Robby Mook and Brian Fallon, whose
chief value lay in their expendable nature and the ease with which Hillary
could roll them up into any unexpected scandal to be disposed with the trash at
a future time of her convenience. I mean the real group of
confidants, the ones who have "the ends justify the means" tattooed
on their souls and have gotten away with more crimes than we'll ever
know. If you're Sid Blumenthal or John Podesta or Cheryl Mills or
Marc Elias or Lanny Davis and you know where some of the bodies are buried
along the spectacular trail of Clinton corruption through the years, then the
prospect of a massive pay-to-play scandal or criminal indictment for
mishandling top-secret intelligence or engaging wittingly or unwittingly in
espionage is just another bump on the long road of progressive relativism and
Clinton nihilism. If Clinton Cash and FBI investigators come knocking, you
simply accuse all your political opponents of being the real grifters and
foreign agents.
That's
exactly what Team Hillary did. They leveled allegations of criminal
bribery at Jeb Bush; they questioned Marco Rubio's loyalty to the United
States; but Donald Trump was the prize. A man who had spent a
lifetime in the exotic world of luxury real estate around the globe while
mixing it up with all kinds of powerful figures in that often shady world was
the ideal mark, and he also happened to be a political novice who the Democrats
universally believed would lose in a landslide of historical dimensions for
political lore long to come. When Paul Manafort joined his team just
before the kickoff to the general election and brought with him a lifetime of
political baggage that included skullduggery around Russia's zone of interest,
it must have seemed as if Christmas had come early for the Clinton
team. (Kind of makes you wonder how coincidental this unforced error
really was.)
And
so, after a lifetime in the public eye, starring in a popular television show,
and rubbing elbows with celebrities and politicians of all stripes, Donald
Trump woke up one day to find himself being generally slandered (and libeled)
as a Russian spy by the information merchants who control America's airwaves
and print media. That had to have made him laugh, considering that
the press had spent most of his foray into politics demeaning him as a greedy
capitalist playboy nationalist who selfishly placed America's interests before
those of our common world.
Yes,
before John Brennan devised a global espionage ring to frame President Trump as
a national security risk and enable the FBI to open up counterintelligence
investigations into his political associates; before Jim Comey and Andrew
McCabe attested to false information with the FISA Court; before Robert Mueller
put the screws to General Flynn in order to sink a lifetime defender of America
for political purposes; before President Obama initiated changes to security
classification that opened up scurrilous investigative records on
President-Elect Trump to an exponentially greater number of bureaucrats with
partisan motivations; before Susan Rice left an electronic CYA memorandum at
12:15 P.M. on Inauguration Day of 2017 noting that Sally Yates and James
Clapper and John Brennan and Joe Biden and Jim Comey had all agreed in the Oval
Office with President Obama to continue any investigations "by the book";
before Samantha Power unmasked hundreds of names picked up during the course of
electronic surveillance that were deemed to somehow implicate the new president
in wrongdoing; even before the Clinton operatives and Fusion GPS and
Christopher Steele first started composing the fan fiction now known as
"the Dossier" — before all of this and everything else we have been
forced to endure for three long years, there was Hillary Clinton, doing what
she and her people know best: accusing her political opponent of the very
crimes she had committed herself.
As
awful as this orchestrated campaign against President Trump has been, it is
absolutely maddening to realize that none of it would have happened had Hillary
Clinton not engaged in one of the greatest pay-for-play operations in American
history while placing our most guarded secrets (as well as the very lives of
our soldiers and civilians) on a silver platter for those governments and
adversaries who wish us the most harm in this world. Three years of
Russian hysteria happened only because of the deep corruption of Hillary
Clinton.
This
scheme of political projection and wicked treachery should go down as a final
reminder that America survives today only because President Trump managed to
prevail against the nearly insurmountable wave of our government's intelligence
agencies, the justice system, media propagandists, and the combined wills of
the Democrats and NeverTrump Republicans intending to swamp him.
Only six
percent of the billions of dollars the "Foundation" takes in goes to
charity. The rest subsidizes the lavish lifestyles of the Clintons
and their sycophants; those people who have sold their souls to rub shoulders
with unadulterated power.
Clinton Foundation Put On Watch
List Of Suspicious ‘Charities’
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/04/charity-navigator-clinton-foundation.html
"But what the
Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the
American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it
to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal.
Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to
every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy
Clinton
Foundation bleeding money with no Clintons in high office
The Bill,
Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation can no longer raise enough money to
cover its expenses, ever since Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign failed
to propel her into an office from which she could dispense political favors.
Clinton Foundation reports to the IRS for the last two tax years have
demonstrated that without anyone to grant boons, fewer donors are interested in
supporting it.
Andrew
Stiles reports for the Free
Beacon:
The Clinton Foundation reported a loss of more than $16 million in
2018, according to newly released tax
records, marking the second
consecutive year of losses since Hillary Clinton's humiliating defeat to
President Donald J. Trump in 2016.
The foundation reported total revenue of just $30.7 million,
including $24.2 million worth of grants and contributions, a record low for the
alleged "charity." That figure was well short of the foundation's
total expenses for the year—$47.5 million— resulting in a net loss of $16.8
million.
The previous year, the Clinton Foundation reported a net loss of
$16.1 million. In total, the organization has lost a staggering $32.9 million
since Hillary Clinton's lifelong quest for the presidency crumbled to dust in
November 2016.
The
contrast with previous years when political favors were a lure is striking:
The Clinton Foundation posted its highest revenue haul ($249 million)
in 2009, the year Hillary was sworn in as President Barack Obama's secretary of
state. By 2013, the foundation had reported an additional $392.2 million in
revenue, and went on to raise $344.4 million between 2014 and 2016.
Between 2008 and 2016, the Clinton Foundation reported total
revenue in excess of $1.1 billion, or an annual average of $130.4 million.
Needless to say, Clinton's stunning failure to defeat Donald Trump in the 2016
election appears to have had a significant impact on the foundation's ability
to raise money.
US Attorney
for Utah, John Huber, has been tasked with investigating the Clinton
Foundation. So far there has not been a single leak out of his office over its
work. That could mean either that they have turned up nothing, or that the
investigation and grand jury are proceeding with the secrecy that the law
demands.
VIDEO:
THE
FRAUDULENT CLINTON FOUNDATION EXPOSED.
PAY-TO-PLAY
FROM THE FIRST DAY!
Is it a signal that she's back in the game because she's
selling her president-ability to the world's global billionaire crowd and
laying the groundwork for more funds? There are all kinds of ways
for foreign billionaires to get money to the U.S. without consequences, after
all. What's more, it's pretty much the biggest base of support she
has, which is at least one reason why she lost the 2016 election.
“The couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public
service” into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth,
with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was
a political machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This
consists essentially of a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big
business support for the Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their
personal fortunes.
The basic components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall
Street and Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and
donations to the ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”
HILLARY &
BILLARY AND RED CHINA!
“Facilitating
strategic technology transfer in return for money is an old Clinton game.
The Chinese bought their way to access of considerable space technology
when Bill Clinton was president. Remember Charlie Trie, Loral, and the rest
of the crew?”
THE
CLINTONS AND RED CHINA:
A
MONEY MAKING TRAITORSHIP!
"Ask
Jeff Sessions about the charges. Money was flowing into the Clinton
Foundation from all over the world, disguised, rerouted through a Canadian
charity, all to obscure its origins."
AMERICAN
PREDATORS:
THE BRIBES
SUCKING LIVES OF HILLARY & BILLARY
The Clintons have been a criminal enterprise since they came to power in
Arkansas. The list of scandals they have generated is long and
tawdry. Their principal goal then and now has always been to enrich
themselves. They never once had a moral compunction about lying,
cheating, selling, and stealing their way to wealth. They are the Perons
of America. They eventually set up a "foundation" and the
money kept rolling in.
Only six percent of the billions of dollars the
"Foundation" takes in goes to charity. The rest subsidizes
the lavish lifestyles of the Clintons and their sycophants; those people who
have sold their souls to rub shoulders with unadulterated power.
THE
SHADY POLITICS OF HILLARY CLINTON and her PAY-TO-PLAY MAFIA
The left cared nothing about that bit of collusion.
Hillary and her campaign aides have long been involved with Russia
for reasons of personal gain. Clinton herself got $145
million in donations to the
Clinton Foundation for allowing Russia to take over twenty percent of all uranium
production in the U.S. Her
campaign chairman, John Podesta, is reaping the financial benefits of being on
the board of a Russian company, Joule, which he did
not disclose. PATRICIA
McCARTHY
Had Hillary been elected, the Clinton Foundation would be raking
in even more millions than it did before. She would be happily selling
access, favors and our remaining freedoms out from under us. PATRICIA McCARTHY
THE
PHONY CLINTON FOUNDATION CHARITY slush fund
“There
is no controlling Bill Clinton. He does whatever he wants and runs up incredible expenses with
foundation funds,” states a separate interview memo attached to the submission.
“Bill
Clinton mixes and matches his personal
business
with that of the foundation. Many
people
within the foundation have tried to
caution
him about this but he does not listen,
and
there really is no talking to him,” the
memo
added.
Peter Schweizer, author of “Secret Empires: How the American Political Class
Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends,”
It’s About Corruption – Replacing a Failed and Corrupt Political
Establishment
American
presidents have their famous speeches, remembered long after they leave office.
JFK said: “Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do
for your country.” Ronald Reagan stood at the Brandenburg Gate and told Mikhail
Gorbachev to: “Tear down this wall.”
Some
speeches are memorable in other ways. George W. Bush, days after 9/11,
ironically announced that: “Islam is peace.” Barack Obama proclaimed
himself the messiah: “This was the moment when the rise of the oceans
began to slow, and our planet began to heal.”
President
Trump has certainly given strong speeches, such as at the recent March for
Life. But he may be remembered more for his raucous rallies and hilarious
tweets. Yet one speech has flown under the radar.
On
Oct. 13, 2016, just weeks before the election, Trump spoke at a campaign rally in Florida.
Leading up to the election, he was holding several rallies each day, giving
numerous speeches, but this seemingly random speech stands out.
The
enigmatic Q group refers to it as the speech that got Donald Trump elected. As
it was one of many pre-election speeches he gave and at a Florida rally, it may
have only been heard by a fraction of Trump voters before the election, but it
certainly encapsulates his philosophy, both before and after the election, toward
government corruption.
The
speech explains the resistance by the Washington, D.C. ruling class to Trump’s
candidacy, election, and presidency. Trump attacked the foundation of deep
state power, wealth, and corruption. Trump was indeed an “existential threat”
to the cabal.
Before
even being elected, and years before Joe Biden decided to run for president,
Donald Trump was focused on corruption. Not to influence his reelection, as
House Democrats accuse, since he wasn’t even president yet. But because rooting
out corruption was part of his plan to make America great again.
Everything
that followed his election, from the Russian collusion accusations, White House
leaks, special counsel investigation, and now impeachment, is a reaction to the
ideas Trump explains in this 6-minute speech. Watch it here or read the transcript.
The
opening lines are prescient, becoming painfully obvious now almost four years
after he laid out the scale of corruption.
Our movement is about replacing a failed
and corrupt political establishment with a new government controlled by you,
the American People. There is nothing the political
establishment will not do, and no lie they will
not tell, to hold on to their prestige and power at your expense.
The Washington establishment, and the financial
and media corporations that fund it, exists for only one reason: to protect and
enrich itself.
The establishment has trillions of dollars at
stake in this election. As an example, just one single trade deal they’d like
to pass, involves trillions of dollars controlled by many countries,
corporations and lobbyists.
For those who control the levers of power in
Washington, and for the global special interests they partner with, our
campaign represents an existential threat.
“Protect
and enrich.” This is a perfect encapsulation of the Clinton Foundation and
the Obama book and television deals. Then there is the Biden family corruption,
followed closely behind by similar abuses of power and office by the Warren and
Sanders families, as Peter Schweizer described in his recent book “Profiles in
Corruption.” These names just scratch the surface of government
corruption.
Candidate
Trump then went on to say:
It’s a global power structure that is responsible
for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our
country of its wealth, and put that money into the pockets of a handful of
large corporations and political entities.
This
is money given to corrupt foreign countries, disguised as aid, only to be
returned to the political elite by hiring their unqualified family members for
do-nothing jobs, as in Hunter Biden, or funneling these U.S. taxpayer dollars
back into political foundations, consultancies, or campaign contributions.
Once
upon a time, journalists investigated such corruption. Now they ignore it,
aiding and abetting the deception. As Trump said in his speech:
The corporate media in our country is no longer
involved in journalism. They are a political special interest, no different
than any lobbyist or other financial entity with an agenda.
Speak
up against the cabal and you will be destroyed, or even commit suicide. Trump
went on:
The establishment and their media enablers wield
control over this nation through means that are well known. Anyone who
challenges their control is deemed a sexist, a racist, a xenophobe and morally
deformed. They will attack you, they will slander you, they will seek to
destroy your career and reputation. And they will lie, lie and lie even more.
It’s
amazing that Trump predicted exactly what happened a few days ago when
“Republican political strategist” Rick Wilson called the group of “you” mentioned above,
“credulous boomer rubes” with CNN hack Don Lemon laughing so hard he almost
fell off his chair.
President
Trump has been impeached for drawing back the curtain on deep state
malfeasance. Before handing over millions of hard earned U.S. taxpayer dollars
to Ukraine, the most corrupt country in Europe,
he wanted to know the money was necessary and going where promised, rather than
into the pockets of oligarchs and U.S. politician grifters.
He
acted as he was required to under the “Treaty with
Ukraine on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters,” ratified in 2000,
15 years before Trump announced his run for president. He was doing his job,
fulfilling his Constitutional oath of office. His reward for pouring roach
killer in the nest of Democrat crooks and knaves was impeachment and a
concerted effort by Democrats, the media, and nasty NeverTrump Republicans, all
heads on the same toxic hydra, to overturn the last election and rig the next
one.
It’s
not about Trump enriching himself, despite what Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler
say, it’s for the country. Again, from the famous speech:
I didn’t need to do this. I built a great
company, and I had wonderful life. I could have enjoyed the benefits of years
of successful business for myself and my family, instead of going through this
absolute horror show of lies, deceptions and malicious attacks. I’m doing it
because this country has given me so much, and I feel strongly it was my turn
to give back.
It’s
all about corruption, exposing it, rooting it out, and destroying it. Those who
are the most threatened are those who scream the loudest. Given the Democrat
and media apoplexy, Trump must be getting closer to the truth.
He
ended his speech by throwing down the gauntlet:
We will vote to put this corrupt government
cartel out of business. We will remove from our politics the special interests
who have betrayed our workers, our borders, our freedoms, and our sovereign
rights as a nation. We will end the politics of profit, we will end the rule of
special interests, we will put a stop to the raiding of our country – and the
disenfranchisement of our people.
It’s
not about abuse of power or obstruction of Congress. It’s not about quid
pro quo or bribery. It’s simply a new sheriff in town, bringing law
and order to drain a swamp of greed and corruption. It’s President Trump doing
exactly what he said he would do if elected, making America great again.
He
is doing what past presidents have talked about and promised, but then either
looked the other way or became active participants in the graft. And those
milking the system are petrified over exposure and their long overdue
reckoning.
Brian C. Joondeph, M.D., is
a Denver-based physician and freelance writer whose pieces have appeared in
American Thinker, Daily Caller, and other publications. Follow him on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and QuodVerum.
September
26, 2020
Donald Trump Should Not Bother with A Presidential Library
Win or lose on Nov. 3, 2020, Donald Trump can set
an excellent example by letting the National Archives retain and later provide
access to all records created or received during his tenure as president of the
United States. Thereafter, citizens and scholars can study these
presidential records. After all, they are our property, and not that of any
single president.
Unlike all presidents in office from 1955 onwards
(when the Presidential Libraries Act was signed into law), Donald Trump entered
the White House with a vast fortune, and a track record promoting and
developing business ventures inside and outside the United States. Given his
accomplishments as president, he and his family will only have more substantial
profit-making opportunities when he leaves the White House.
The Trump family will later only be hurt,
possibly grievously from a financial point of view, if they simultaneously get
involved with a presidential library. Loved by many, but hated by denizens
of the still lubricated deep state swamp, he will be relentlessly pursued by
the very people who have let the Clinton family exploit their purported charity
for personal and political gain since Oct. 23,1997.
Why?
Though the Clintons and other dynastic political
families including the Bush and Obama clans profess otherwise, presidential
libraries are public charities -- these are supposed to be governed by
directors or trustees who are broadly representative of the public at large,
and certainly not blind supporters of a president. These entities may not push
or oppose a political candidate, nor may they promote or block
legislation. Moreover, public charities may not, during their entire life
create more than an insubstantial amount of "private gain" in total
through their operation.
The Bill Clinton
Presidential Library in Little Rock, Arkansas
Photo credit: Thomas
R Machnitzki, under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2
In financial terms, insubstantial has been held
to be amounts of $1,000 or less. Here, private gain does not merely mean
financial gain (unfairly and generously priced speech, book and film deals, or
sweetheart investment terms) but any kind of advantage or edge created for
insiders at the supposed charity. Most of all, public charities must actually
exist. If they are nonprofit corporations, they must incorporate, then organize
by adopting articles of incorporation and bylaws, and scrupulously follow all
applicable laws, everywhere they operate or solicit donations.
In recent years, attorneys general in New York
State have persecuted the Trump family for operating charities outside local
law, even though no Clinton charities, and there are too many of these, have
ever registered truthfully to operate and to solicit inside the Empire State.
Meanwhile many different lawyers and law firms
have "studied" public filings of "The Clinton Foundation,"
identified glaring defects, but chosen to either look the other way, or in the
name of DLA Piper in November 2015, to make manifestly false claims suggesting
that the filings complied with applicable laws and regulations. Since Mar. 16,
2015, a number of concerned persons have documented massive, ongoing, illegal activities
carried out in the name of "The Clinton Foundation" and others
involving a supposed organization using Federal Employer Identification Number
31-1580204. Google searches, www.charlesortel.com,
and @CharlesOrtel are good places to find perspectives on these apparent
charity frauds.
After trying to stimulate interest in
investigating and bringing to justice those responsible for directing the
largest criminal fraud and corruption exercise ever attempted using charities
in traditional media, I started cohosting podcasts with Hollywood veteran Jason
Goodman in various formats under the www.crowdsourcethetruth.com umbrella.
Our latest podcast is linked here. These
cumulative efforts have triggered interest in many places inside and
outside the United States. And now we wait to see whether authorities will do
the right thing and demonstrate, via prosecutions and plea agreements that
even, and especially, dynastic political families are subject to our laws.
Since November 1992, publicly available evidence
shows that the Clintons have schemed with their supporters to monetize their
"public service" using leaky charities that fail, lawfully, to
account for their activities as is required. This abominable record is emulated
by others in both parties and in many foreign nations.
America's founders did not throw off the yoke of
monarchy to replace it with a new form of intolerant rule by unregulated,
self-selected cultists in thrall to gauzy themes like "globalism,"
and unvetted schemes to address "inequality" and "climate
change" chiefly by seizing wealth and income of the meek.
Intended to serve as archives and research facilities
into the histories of presidents, presidential libraries in modern times have
become vanity exercises through which corrupt interests can pay tribute to
families seeking to rule, we the people using monuments to themselves. Given
existing technology alone, libraries are becoming expensive anachronisms, that
need to be heated, cooled, and maintained.
The 45th president should set another
cutting-edge marker letting his records remain at the main National Archives
complex. Then, after he leaves the White House he and his family can
profit to their hearts' content, unfettered by the real conflicts of interest
that come and should be prosecuted when merchants in misery like the Clintons
(and others) milk public charities. illegally.
Charles Ortel is host of the YouTube
series, Sunday with Charles. An archive of 263 episodes since June 2017 is
found here.
No comments:
Post a Comment