And the Mexicans, having reached the bottom of the hole they have dug for themselves, just chose to keep digging by electing a new leftist presidente who wants to surrender to the cartels and who thinks that Mexicans have some sort of hitherto unknown “human right” to sneak into the United States and demographically reconquer it.
One in every eleven persons born in Mexico has gone to the U.S. The National Review reported that in 2014 $1.87 billion was spent on incarcerating illegal immigrant criminals….Now add hundreds of billions for welfare and remittances! MICHAEL BARGO, Jr…… for the AMERICAN THINKER.COM
One new
Mexican president. Dozens of new reasons to build the wall.
By Colin Flaherty
In
Mexico, it is often impolite to tell someone "No." If you
want to spare someone's feelings, many people say "Maybe."
Everyone
knows that means "No."
Mexico
stopped worrying about American feelings long ago. Among the
fashionable public officials and academics, scorn has been the ruling emotion
for decades. We see that more recently in the last week's elections.
Pretending
otherwise is just too much work in Mexico today. The new president
declares he is a socialist, but he will be hard pressed to show how his new
socialist policies are at all different from the old socialist policies that
govern so many parts of Mexican life. That's what we said about
Venezuela, come to think of it.
Those
who predict that their "Fill in Blank" Latin American country has
finally bottomed out and is now turning around are often, even invariably,
wrong.
But
at least admitting they are socialists has the added benefit of sticking a
finger in the eye of their terrible neighbors to the north – who everyone knows
ruined Mexico by stealing a good chunk of the country in 1848.
Anyone
who reads the daily papers in Mexico is reminded of that 157-year-old treaty
every day: for most of the country, the national slogan and curse remains
"Mexico, so far from God, so close to the United States." We can even hear it
today from Mexican nationals and their descendants in the U.S. who glorify La
Raza at the expense of their adopted country.
Oh,
and by the way, Americans are still waiting for any kind of public display of
support for those who died on 9-11. Mexicans largely ignored it,
when they were not supporting it behind closed doors at their local universities.
The
truly troubling pronouncements out of Mexico City are even easier to
find. The newly elected president, Andrés López-Obrador, was gleeful
during the election when he told his compadres they should all move
to America, illegally. His encouragement along with his pro-poverty
policies will set the stage for another tsunami of illegal immigration.
Then
members of López-Obrador's Cabinet-in-waiting started talking about the war on
drug cartels, and why should Mexico do America's dirty work?
The
first statement does not need much interpretation, other than the obvious but
often ignored: the new president of Mexico is encouraging his countrymen to
invade the United States. Not with guns and soldiers, but with campesinos and huaraches.
It's
a bitter and hostile act that we should treat as such.
The
new talk about amnesty for drug-dealers is even crazier. This is
just an admission of what anyone who cares to already knows: Mexico is run by a
collection of drug cartels and other violent outlaws. This
collection of criminals has killed thousands of public officials, policemen,
and reporters – all in the name of preserving a criminal status quo that no one
even feels like pretending does not exist anymore. They even write
songs glorifying them.
They
get what they want when they want it.
That
is why we cannot build the Coulter-Trump Border Wall fast enough, tall enough,
and proudly enough.
In addition to writing scintillating bestsellers about black
violence in America, good ol' Colin Flaherty also covered Mexico for several
newspapers and radio stations in San Diego, back in the day.
THE NARCOMEX INVASION OF AMERICA…. By
invitation of the Democrat Party
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/11/trump-seeks-deal-with-narcomex-as.html
There are many reasons
why, for the first time, the government of Mexico would agree to work
cooperatively with the United States over an extremely serious
immigration-related issue. It is likely, of course that President Trump was not
just posturing when he said he would cut off aid to Mexico and other countries
who permit the United States to be invaded by illegal aliens.
Under Guzman’s leadership, the Sinaloa Cartel became the largest
drug trafficking organization in the world with influence in every major U.S.
city.
The allegations against Pena Nieto are
not new. In 2016, Breitbart
News reported on an investigation by Mexican journalists
which revealed how Juarez Cartel operators funneled money into the
2012 presidential campaign. The investigation was carried out by Mexican
award-winning journalist Carmen
Aristegui and
her team….The subsequent scandal became known as “Monexgate” for the cash
cards that were given out during Peña Nieto’s campaign. The allegations
against Pena Nieto went largely unreported by U.S. news outlets.
MEXICO DECLARES WAR ON THE
UNITED STATES
THE
INVASION:
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/10/narcomex-orchestrates-foreign-invasion.html
“The radicals seek nothing less than secession from
the United States whether to form their own sovereign state or to reunify with
Mexico. Those who desire reunification with Mexico are irredentists who seek to
reclaim Mexico's "lost" territories in the American Southwest.” Maria
Hsia Chang Professor of Political Science, University of Nevada Reno
"Mexican president
candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador called for mass immigration to the United
States, declaring it a "human right". We will defend all the
(Mexican) invaders in the American," Obrador said, adding that immigrants
"must leave their towns and find a life, job, welfare, and free medical in
the United States."
"Fox’s
Tucker Carlson noted Thursday that Obrador has previously proposed ranting
AMNESTY TO MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS. “America is now Mexico’s social safety net,
and that’s a very good deal for the Mexican ruling class,” Carlson added."
COST to AMERICANS
of the LA RAZA MEXICAN OCCUPATION in CALIFORNIA ALONE: $2,370 per legal.
All that “cheap”
labor is staggeringly expensive!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2014/06/cost-to-americans-of-la-raza-mexican.html
"Most
Californians, who have seen their taxes increase while public services
deteriorate, already know the impact that mass illegal immigration is having on
their communities, but even they may be shocked when they learn just how much
of a drain illegal immigration has become." FAIR President Dan Stein.
Californians
bear an enormous fiscal burden as a
result of an illegal alien population
estimated at
almost 3 million residents. The annual expenditure
of state and
local tax dollars on services for that
population is $25.3 billion. That total
amounts to a
yearly burden of about $2,370 for a household
headed by a U.S.
citizen.
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S WAR ON
AMERICA’S LEGAL WORKERS, BORDERS AND LAWS as they build the LA RAZA welfare
state on our backs.
One in every eleven persons born
in Mexico has gone to the U.S. The National Review reported
that in 2014 $1.87
billion was spent on incarcerating illegal immigrant criminals….Now add hundreds
of billions for welfare and remittances! MICHAEL BARGO, Jr…… for
the AMERICAN THINKER.COM
"Chairman of the DNC Keith
Ellison was even spotted wearing a
shirt stating, "I don't believe in borders" written in Spanish.
According to a new CBS
news poll, 63
percent of Americans in competitive congressional districts think those
crossing illegally should be immediately deported or arrested. This
is undoubtedly contrary to the views expressed by the Democratic Party.
Their endgame is open borders,
which has become evident over the last eight years. Don't for one
second let them convince you otherwise." Evan Berryhill Twitter @EvBerryhill.
Mexican
Presidents Deny They Took Bribes
from
El Chapo
https://www.breitbart.com/border/2018/11/14/mexican-presidents-deny-they-took-bribes-from-el-chapo/
Two former Mexican presidents publicly denied taking bribes
from the Sinaloa Cartel. The statements came after the legal defense for
Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán Loera made contrary claims this week.
The drug lord is facing
several money laundering and drug trafficking charges at a federal trial in New
York. In his opening statement, defense attorney Jeffrey Lichtman spoke of
bribes “including the very top, the current president of Mexico and the
former.”
Soon after the
statements became public, Mexico’s government issued a statement denying the
allegations. Eduardo Sanchez, the spokesman for current Mexican President
Enrique Pena Nieto said the statements were false and “defamatory.”
El
gobierno de @EPN persiguió, capturó y extraditó al criminal Joaquín Guzmán Loera. Las
afirmaciones atribuidas a su abogado son completamente falsas y difamatorias
— Eduardo Sánchez H.
(@ESanchezHdz) November 13, 2018
Former Mexican
President Felipe Calderon took to social media to personally deny the
allegations, claiming that neither El Chapo or the Sinaloa Cartel paid him
bribes.
Son
absolutamente falsas y temerarias las afirmaciones que se dice realizó el
abogado de Joaquín “el Chapo” Guzmán. Ni él, ni el cártel de Sinaloa ni ningún
otro realizó pagos a mi persona.
— Felipe Calderón
(@FelipeCalderon) November 13, 2018
Under Guzman’s
leadership, the Sinaloa Cartel became the largest drug trafficking organization
in the world with influence in every major U.S. city.
The allegations against
Pena Nieto are not new. In 2016, Breitbart News reported on an
investigation by Mexican journalists which revealed how Juarez Cartel
operators funneled money into the 2012 presidential campaign. The investigation
was carried out by Mexican award-winning journalist Carmen Aristegui and her team. The
subsequent scandal became known as “Monexgate” for the cash cards that were given
out during Peña Nieto’s campaign. The allegations against Pena Nieto went
largely unreported by U.S. news outlets.
Ildefonso Ortiz is an award-winning journalist with Breitbart
Texas. He co-founded the Cartel Chronicles project with Brandon Darby and
Stephen K. Bannon. You can follow him on Twitter and on Facebook. He can be contacted at Iortiz@breitbart.com.
Brandon Darby is the managing director and editor-in-chief of
Breitbart Texas. He co-founded the Cartel Chronicles project with Ildefonso
Ortiz and Stephen K. Bannon. Follow him on Twitter and Facebook. He can be contacted at bdarby@breitbart.com.
Kurt Schlichter
One fact a lot of Americans forget is
that our country is located right up against a socialist failed state that is
promising to descend even further into chaos – not California, the other one. And
the Mexicans, having reached the bottom of the hole they have dug for
themselves, just chose to keep digging by electing a new leftist presidente who wants to surrender to the cartels and who thinks that Mexicans
have some sort of hitherto unknown “human right” to sneak into the United
States and demographically reconquer it. There’s a Spanish phrase that
describes his ideology, and one of the words is toro.
Mexico is already a failed state,
crippled by a poisoned, stratified culture and a corrupt government that have
somehow managed to turn a nation so blessed with resources and hardworking
people into such a basket case that millions of its citizens see their best
option as putting themselves in the hands of gangsters to cross a burning
desert to get cut-rate jobs in el Norte. It is a country dominated by bloody
drug/human trafficking cartels that like to circulate videos of their members
carving up living people. They hang mutilated corpses from overpasses and
hijack busloads of citizens to rape and slaughter for fun. Whole police
agencies are owned by the cartels. Political candidates live in fear of murder.
The people are scared. And this chaos will inevitably grow and spread north.
The gangs
are already here, importing the meth and fentanyl that are slaughtering tens of
thousands of Americans a year after coming across the border the Democrats
refuse to defend. Let’s not even think about the other foreigners, like Islamic
terrorists, who might exploit this vulnerability. “Abolish ICE,” the liberals
screech, yet what they really mean is “Erase that line on the map.” But that
line is all that is keeping the bloodshed in Mexico at bay for now. You can
stand on US soil, look south, and see places where the rates of killing dwarf
those of the Middle Eastern killing fields you see on TV.
The chaos
in Mexico will spill over the theoretical border. It is just a matter of time.
Normal Americans know it. As my book upcoming
book Militant Normals explains, the establishment willfully
ignoring their legitimate concerns about border security is a big part of why
Normals are getting militant. The Democrats, and the GOP donor class stooges,
have a vested interest in ignoring the issue, and they will insure that both
the political class and the hack media will continue to play ostrich. Already
there are Americans, on American soil, living near the border who cannot
venture outside at night on their own property for fear of being murdered
because of foreigners invading out territory. This is intolerable for any
sovereign country. Yet there is a huge liberal constituency, abetted by GOPe
fellow travelers, not merely willing to tolerate the invasion but who actively
want to increase the flow.
When the
125-million-man criminal conspiracy that is Mexico falls apart completely, as
it will, we are going to have to deal with the consequences. Watch the flood of
illegals become a tsunami, a real refugee crisis instead of today’s fake one.
Watch the criminal gangs and pathologies of the Third World socialist culture
they bring along turn our country into Mexico II: Gringo Boogaloo.
And importing a huge mass of foreigners,
loyal to a foreign country and potentially susceptible to the reconquista de Aztlan rhetoric of leftists, both among them and among our treacherous
liberal elite, would create a cauldron for brewing up violent civil upheaval
right here at home.
So, what
do we do? We defend ourselves, obviously. But how?
Should we
be reactive? Should we continue the fake defense of our border we’re pretending
to conduct today? Or should we seriously defend ourselves by building a wall
and truly guarding it, and by deporting all illegals we catch inside. But would
that even be enough when Mexico collapses?
It’s time
to ask: Should we be proactive?
Should we
invade Mexico? Should we send our military across the Rio Grande to secure the
unstable territory, annihilate the criminal infestation that suppurates there,
and impose something resembling order? One thing is certain. The border charade
we tolerate today can’t be an option – it’s an open door to the fallout from
the failing state next door.
Militarily,
there are three obvious courses of action (I had input on this by several
people familiar with the issue; none of this reflects any actual operational
planning that I or anyone I spoke to is aware of).
One is
the Buffer Zone option. We move in and secure a zone perhaps 50-100 miles
inside the country, aggressively targeting and annihilating criminal gangs – we
know where these bastards are – and thereby seal off the threat until Mexico is
secure again and then return the territory once we are assured America is safe.
This is
doable, but it would take a huge chunk of our military forces (we would need to
call up most of our reserves). The conventional Mexican forces that fought
would last for about un momento before being vaporized, but
it would spark at a minimum a low-intensity insurgency by cartel hardliners
and, at worst, a large one by Mexican patriots, probably using guns left over
from when the Obama cartel was shipping them south. Regardless, it would be
expensive. There is the “You break it, you buy it” rule. We would end up
administering a long strip of territory full of people living, largely, in what
Americans consider abject poverty. They would become our problem. Moreover,
there is the giving back part – millions of Mexicans might find they like being
nieces and nephews of Tio Sam.
The
second is Operation Mexican Freedom, a much more ambitious campaign that would
recognize what liberals already think – that Mexico and America are one
country. Our forces would conquer the nation by driving all the way south,
perhaps with an amphibious landing at Veracruz for old times sake and because
the Marines would insist, then seal the Mexican-Guatemalan border. We would
annex the whole country, making it a colony like Puerto Rico (A dozen new
senators from Old Mexico? Nogracias). We would kill every
terrorist drug gang member and take or torch everything they own, while
simultaneously deporting every illegal from the US-Canada border to the
Mexican-Guatemalan border.
Of
course, that would take up pretty much our entire military and certainly spark
some sort of endless guerilla conflict. We would be stuck in another bloody,
expensive fight to make a Third World country cease sucking despite itself. It
would make the Iraq War seem cheap. But, on the plus side, Bill Kristol and his
bombs away pals would probably be excited.
Oh, in
both cases the Europeans would be outraged, which is a powerful argument for
these options.
Still,
no. Invading Mexico is a bad idea. It would convert the problems of Mexico,
created and perpetuated by Mexicans, into our problems. We tried that in the
Middle East. It doesn’t work. Making Mexico better for Mexicans is not worth
the life of one First Infantry Division grenadier.
But the
consequences in America are our problem, and we must solve it. That brings us
to the third option – Forward Defense. Think Syria in Sinaloa. We secure the
border, with a wall of concrete and a wall of troops, perhaps imposing a
no-fly/no-sail zone (excepting our surveillance and attack aircraft), and then
conduct operations inside Mexico using special operations forces combined with
airpower to target and eliminate the cartels. We would also identify friendly
local Mexican police and military officials and support their counter-cartel
operations outside of our relationship with the central government – they would
be the face of the fight. We would channel Hernán Cortés and, in essence, we would allow
friendly Mexican allies, with our substantial direct and indirect support, to
create our buffer zone for us.
This
avoids the problem of buying Mexico’s problems and making them ours. It’s
somewhat deniable; everyone could save face by denying the Yankees have
intervened. But the cartels would not just sit there and take it. They would
target Americans and probably do so inside the United States. Yet that’s going
to happen anyway eventually. This course of action risks the lowest number of
US casualties, but perhaps the highest number of Mexican losses.
So no, we
should not invade Mexico. There are no good military options, and none are
necessary or wise today, but we may eventually have to choose between bad
options. Mexico is failing more and more every day. We are not yet at the point
of a military solution, but anyone who says that day can never come is lying to
himself and to you. We need a wall, but more than that, we need the commitment
to American security and sovereignty that a wall would physically represent.
The issue is very clear, and we need to be very, very clear about it when we
are campaigning in November. Border security. Period.
Are we
going to prioritize the interests of liberals who want to replace our militant Normal
voters with
pliable foreigners and establishment stooges who want to please rich donors by
importing countless cheap foreign laborers, or are we going to prioritize the
economic security and the physical safety of American citizens by securing our
border no matter what it takes?
Come on,
open borders mafia, let’s have that discussion. Bueno suerte with
that at the ballot box.
No comments:
Post a Comment