Thursday, January 7, 2021

HOW MUCH IS SENATOR DIANNE FEINSTEIN MAKING SERVING HER PAYMASTERS IN RED CHINA? MORE THAN HUNTER BIDEN?

To this day, those same paragons of virtue see nothing strange about Joe Biden using his office to collect checks from China and Ukraine, when a less esteemed onlooker might say Biden's family is severely compromised by foreign powers.  Is democracy threatened if the future president is paid directly by communist China?  Apparently not.  Biden's financial quid pro quo with our nation's adversaries didn't bother democracy-lovers in D.C. in the slightest; what bothered them was the possibility that President Trump might effectively expose it before the 2020 election. 

Chinese Communist Party Bans Members from Opinions ‘Inconsistent’ with the Party

Chinese President Xi Jinping stands by national flags at the Schloss Bellevue presidential residency in Berlin on March 28, 2014. Chinese President Xi Jinping begins a landmark visit to fellow export powerhouse Germany Friday, the third leg of his European tour, expected to cement flourishing trade ties and focus on …
JOHANNES EISELE/AFP/Getty Images
3:01

The Communist Party of China (CPC) revised restrictions on what its members are allowed to say in public in a set of regulations published on Monday, the South China Morning Post (SCMPreported.

“A member of the party must not publicly express opinions that are inconsistent with decisions made by the central leadership,” reads Article 16 of the revised regulations, which concerns safeguarding the rights of the CPC’s 92 million members.

The regulation’s wording was altered from a similar clause banning the public expression of opinions that are the “opposite of” the party leadership’s decisions.

“Article 11 of the new rules stipulates that while party members are entitled to report misconduct by other members, including those who hold a higher rank, they must not disseminate such information at will and must not do so on the internet,” according to the Hong Kong-based newspaper.

The original version of the article contained similar wording but did not single out “the internet” as a prohibited means of dissemination.

“Party members are encouraged to report misconduct to the party’s circuit inspection teams,” according to the SCMP.

The inspection teams ostensibly investigate allegations of corruption within the party and have brought down several senior CPC officials in recent years.

Additional CPC rule revisions published on Monday “stipulate that work-related mistakes will no longer be treated as discipline violations,” according to the report, indicating that party members were previously punished for their work blunders.

Monday’s revisions to the CPC’s regulations officially incorporate references to “Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era,” the name for Chinese dictator and CPC General Secretary Xi Jinping’s socialist ideology. Known simply as “Xi Jinping Thought,” the philosophy’s precepts are included in the CPC constitution and were written into the Chinese state constitution in 2018.

Chinese state media praised the CPC’s revised regulations on Monday, according to the SCMP, “saying they represented progress in protecting the political rights of party members.”

“The amended party rules, which include new guidelines on access to information and how to handle internal complaints, were described by state media as ‘boosting democracy within the party,'” according to the report.

People’s Daily, the official newspaper of the CPC’s central committee, published an op-ed by Wang Qishan in 2014 in which the then-leader of the party’s anti-corruption body argued that joining the CPC meant sacrificing certain rights and freedoms.

“Senior Party officials need to waive more as they shoulder greater responsibilities,” the politician said in the November 2014 article. Wang is now vice president of the People’s Republic of China.



In DC, Oligarchy Beats Democracy Every Time

A much higher share of the American public believes that the U.S. government is lying about its knowledge of UFOs than telling the truth about the 2020 presidential election.  How's that for credibility?  

The Big Government–Big Tech–Big Media machine that is invested in removing Donald Trump from office is so confident in its position that it keeps shouting, "There's nothing to see here," and every day, there's more and more to see.  Data scientists with weighty reputations allege that over forty thousand votes for Trump were likely deleted or switched to Biden in Georgia, and they allege that over four hundred thousand votes were removed from Trump in Pennsylvania in addition to the commonwealth's inexplicable reporting of two hundred thousand more ballots cast than people who voted.  In Wisconsin, the state Supreme Court has ruled that two hundred thousand votes were likely illegal but insists that none be purged until each ballot is individually investigated — a remedy that makes it easy to cast a fraudulent vote but quite difficult for Wisconsin to remove it.  These are just a few of the latest examples of 2020's election catastrophe.  

The number of fraudulent votes in play here is huge.  A political class that devotes itself to the religion of science should be overwhelmed by the mathematical evidence for fraud in the 2020 election.  Yet it turns out that even science can be discarded when it proves that Donald Trump won re-election.  Americans are supposed to pretend none of this is real, forget everything they've seen, and accept a Biden presidency as legitimate.  

Meanwhile, former secretaries of defense have begun threatening Trump administration officials for contesting election fraud.  Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan have eagerly joined Democrats to condemn Republican lawmakers for having the temerity to acknowledge increasingly clear proof of widespread vote manipulation in battleground states.  And still no courtroom in the country has permitted any election dispute to be heard on the merits (despite the media narrative claiming otherwise).

If truth were on the side of the government cabal "installing" Biden in the White House, wouldn't the installers welcome debate over the election irregularities for the whole country to see?  Wouldn't rigorous examination of data anomalies dispel doubts about 2020?  Why must the same people who insist that Biden won also work so hard to conceal the evidence that he did not?  And if sunlight is still the best disinfectant for corruption, then why are judges, governors, and former defense secretaries all demanding darkness?

Romney, Ryan, and other pro-Biden Republicans are so upset that anybody would dare challenge suspicious election results that they've deemed legislative debate "dangerous for democracy."  If by "democracy" they mean "rule by the people," then it is quite peculiar that we must silence the objections of a hundred million or more American citizens in order to preserve the people's power.  If half the country believes that the 2020 election was filled with so many voting irregularities and so much provable ballot fraud that nothing about it should stand, does respect for democracy demand that millions of Americans keep their mouths shut?  Silencing the American public in order to preserve democracy sounds a lot like amputating a man's head so that his body stays healthy.  Can it really be true that democracy requires elected representatives to ignore the voices of their constituents and to cease representing them?  If so, defending democracy sure is a tricky business!

Likewise, where were all these former secretaries of defense who now insist that fighting election fraud is a threat to democracy when our country was under attack from within these last four years?  They never sounded worried for democracy when it was established that the Intelligence Community and FBI leadership spied on Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign.  They never expressed a belief that democracy was at risk when the former director of the CIA lied to the world for years about a Russia collusion hoax and accused President Trump of being a compromised asset of a foreign enemy.  The FBI, the CIA, and politically biased special prosecutors nearly took down a sitting president, and the illustrious defenders of democracy said nary a word.  

To this day, those same paragons of virtue see nothing strange about Joe Biden using his office to collect checks from China and Ukraine, when a less esteemed onlooker might say Biden's family is severely compromised by foreign powers.  Is democracy threatened if the future president is paid directly by communist China?  Apparently not.  Biden's financial quid pro quo with our nation's adversaries didn't bother democracy-lovers in D.C. in the slightest; what bothered them was the possibility that President Trump might effectively expose it before the 2020 election.  They were so concerned about that possibility that fifty of them signed their names to the lie that the Biden family corruption was nothing but Russian disinformation.  For former intelligence and defense officials concerned that the truth about Biden would ruin his presidential bid, the only way to protect democracy was to engage in a campaign of propaganda meant to influence the outcome of America's "free" election.  When foreign nations meddle in our elections with disinformation, we call it an "attack," but when former intelligence chiefs and generals deliberately do so themselves, they are celebrated by the media as heroes.  Protecting democracy sure does require a lot of anti-democratic fixes!

When all these "democracy-defenders" demand that Americans smother their own common sense in the interests of preserving democracy, it sure seems that it is actually democracy they most fear.  If millions of Americans reject the 2020 presidential election as the product of massive fraud, then how could the American people's demand for free and fair elections constitute anything but "democracy in action"?  On the other hand, if a few hundred officials in D.C. insist on rejecting the concerns of the people, then aren't they abandoning any pretense of "government by the people" in favor of rule by an elite few?  Of course they are.

Democracy's biggest defenders in D.C. would be called oligarchs in any other country.

When our D.C. oligarchs claim that something in the United States is a "threat to democracy," what they mean is that the institutions providing the oligarchy legal immunity and power over the people are in danger.  Exposing and eradicating documented electoral vote fraud sustains healthy, democratic institutions, but exposing how corrupt the 2020 election was threatens the oligarchy's hold on those same institutions.  

Just as Marxist Democrats must enslave the people in order to set them free, the oligarchs ruling from D.C. must ignore the public's grievances in order to strengthen the "democratic system."  It's an arrangement that can last only until enough Americans recognize it as the lie it is.  It's also why fewer and fewer Americans believe anything our government has to say. 

The China Threat is Real - and Upon Us

The Communist regime believes victory is within its grasp.

  

So what’s all this concern about Communist China?

Well, let’s start with a little history lesson. From 1966 until 1976 the great ‘Cultural Revolution’ took place in Communist China. Led by the Communist Party leader Mao Zedong, the end result was that upwards of twenty million Chinese citizens simply ceased to exist.

Killed by their masters in the Communist Chinese Party for such crimes as ‘independent thought’. Of course, there were many other crimes against the people for which Chinese citizens were accused, tortured, and executed, but primarily they were killed at the whims of the local party officials in their small community or region. The blood flowed freely in China, all of it the blood of innocent Chinese citizens.

In 1978, two years after Mao died the new Chinese Communist Party leader Deng Xiaoping began to dismantle the Maoist policies that had led to so much bloodshed. He began to implement reforms that helped China recover somewhat from the damage inflicted by the Communist government during the Cultural Revolution.

Today the Chinese economy is one of the strongest in the world, and China’s military is one of the worlds’ largest, and is also well equipped. China has gone full speed ahead to try to gain any economic and military advantage that it could by stealing Western technology at an unprecedented rate. If it has some value to the Chinese government and it isn’t bolted to the floor, there’s a good chance the Chinese Intelligence service will steal it. They’ve even been known to bring a pair of bolt cutters along with them to steal what’s bolted to the floor.

China’s Intelligence service has infiltrated every corner of American life. Politics, academia, the news media.  They are very active on college campuses, and not only involved in academic pursuits but are also involved in stirring up dissent and recruiting impressionable young minds.

We already now know how Communist China has made an effort to recruit American politicians, starting at the local level and supporting candidates who appear to exhibit promise and the potential for higher office, and those who also exhibit vulnerability and character defects that can be exploited later. Democratic Senator Diane Feinstein and Congressman Eric Swalwell are just two of the most recent examples.  Who knows how many more have yet to come to light.

Many colleges and universities are involved in government research work which the Chinese have been successful at gaining access to, through willing participants from the research and academic community involved in these government projects.

Many have been recruited by and are cooperating with and providing information and program access to the Chinese Intelligence service. The research which costs the U.S. government billions of dollars in funding is quickly stolen by the Chinese Intelligence for a negligible cost.

A few thousand dollars into someone’s pocket, some sexual payoffs to someone else. A mere pittance compared to what it would cost the Chinese to fund the research and development out of their own pockets. Not to mention the years spent doing the hard work that China can just skip right over and steal the finished product. It’s happened regularly in the past and is ongoing.

When considering the threat Communist China poses to our nation all one has to do is look on the streets of America in recent years. Much of the civil strife and unrest that we have been and continue to experience has the fingerprints of Communist China all over it.

ANTIFA, BLM, and any other leftist organizations are most certainly quietly influenced - if not outright infiltrated and getting their marching orders from Communist China. China’s participation may be hidden, using third parties - some very high profile, maybe even well-known former political figures - but China’s hand is there nonetheless. And China will continue their efforts to destroy our country from within, based on the success they have experienced thus far.

Make no mistake about it, Communist China is ‘all in’ on this effort. They have crossed a line and there’s no turning back for them. To do so would be to admit defeat and lose face. China believes that they are getting close, and that victory is within their grasp.

With a Biden Administration, they may well be correct.  And one day not long after, America may also experience its own ‘cultural revolution’.

Ossoff Promoted Chinese Propaganda Outlet After Stint as ‘National Security Aide’

CCP outlet has rebuffed Justice Dept order to register as foreign agent

  •  
  •  
  •  
Jon Ossoff (Photo by Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images)

Georgia Democratic Senate hopeful Jon Ossoff promoted a Chinese state-run media outlet that has rebuffed U.S. lawmakers' demands to register as a foreign agent.

Months after leaving Rep. Hank Johnson's (D., Ga.) office—where he spent five months serving as a "national security aide" with top-secret clearance—in August 2012, Ossoff urged his Twitter followers to read Xinhua News Agency, a Chinese Communist Party-run propaganda organ.

"Esp. during 18th Party Congress, #follow @XHNews (Xinhua – Chinese state media)," Ossoff wrote.

The Democrat has struggled to fend off GOP senator David Perdue's criticism of his ties to China. In July, Ossoff quietly disclosed receiving a payment from a Chinese-backed media giant, but has since refused to release private financial information from his foreign film company, Insight TWI. In addition, Ossoff's father—who has bankrolled the Democrat's political career—met with Chinese "dignitaries" after commissioning a 60-foot yacht from a China-based shipbuilder tied to Communist Party Officials.

The Ossoff campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

Founded in 1931, Xinhua News Agency is the largest media outlet in China and serves as the communist nation's primary state-run mouthpiece, though it boasts that it will never "yield to the pressure of ideological stigmatization and political bias" in its Twitter bio. The outlet was chastised by U.S. lawmakers in January after paying the social media giant to promote posts that attacked pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong.

"Two months on, the escalating violence in Hong Kong has taken a heavy toll on the social order," one such post read. "Hong Kong residents have called for order to be restored."

Rep. Jim Banks (R., Ind.) responded by asking then-Attorney General William Barr to investigate Xinhua News Agency, noting that the outlet rebuffed a 2018 Justice Department order to register as a foreign agent. The Trump administration's order followed a bipartisan appeal from senators Marco Rubio (R., Fla.) and Patrick Leahy (D., Vt.).

While another Chinese state-run outlet—China Global Television Network—went on to register as a foreign agent in February 2019, Xinhua News Agency has thus far refused. A Washington Free Beacon review of U.S. Foreign Agents Registration Act filings shows that the outlet has yet to register as a foreign agent.

Ossoff came under fire for misrepresenting his time working in Johnson's office during his failed 2017 congressional campaign. While the Democrat claimed that he spent five years as a "national security aide with top-secret clearance," Ossoff later admitted that he worked full-time for Johnson for just two years and held top-secret clearance for only five months.

Ossoff will face Perdue in Georgia's January 5 run-off election.

No comments: